J. Krauss, Reinventing Project-Based Learning. Eugene, OR: InternationalSociety for Technology in Education, 2007.[4] F. Gablenick, J. McGregor, R. S. Matthews, and B. L. Smith, Learning Communities:Creating, Connections Among Students, Faculty, and Disciplines. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc, 1990.[5] R. DeFour and R. Eaker, Professional Learning Communities at Work: Best Practices forEnhancing Student Achievement. Bloomington, IN: National Education Service, 1998.[6] National Academy of Engineering, Engineering Technology Education in the United States.Accessed: December 11, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/23402[7] R. Cooper, “Stage-Gate Systems: A New Tool for Managing New Products,” BusinessHorizons, pp. 44-54
Paper ID #30123Experiencing Ethical Engineering PracticeMs. Dayoung Kim, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dayoung Kim is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her current research interest centers on engineering ethics and social responsibility, and she is specifically interested in cultural influences on engineers’ moral formation. She earned her B.S. degree in Chemical Engineering at Yonsei University, South Korea in 2017.Dr. Justin L Hess, Purdue University at West Lafayette Dr. Justin L Hess is an assistant professor in the School of
] Johnson, M.J., & Sheppard, S. D. (2004). Relationships between engineering students and faculty demographicsand stakeholders working to affect change. Journal of Engineering Education, 93, 139-151.[2] Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., & Bogue, B. (2012). Leaving engineering: A multi-year singleinstitution study. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 225-246.[3] Besterfield-Sacre, M., Moreno, M., Shuman, L. J., & Atman, C. J. (2001). Gender and ethnicity differences infreshmen engineering student attitudes: A cross-institutional study. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(4), 477-489.[4] Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., & Bogue, B. (2009). Women engineering students and self-efficacy: Amulti-year, multi-institution
Passed* Mode 1 A 21 12 5 4 81% F2F 2 A 21 20 1 0 95% F2F 3 B 25 12 8 5 48% F2F 4 C 30 27 2 1 90% F2F 5 D 35 30 3 2 86% F2F 6 A 12 10 1 1 83% Online Overall 144 111 20 13 91% Actually moved on: 81%* Here “passed” means at a sufficient level to move on in the core. A D- or better passed all courses
., Muralidhar, B., Zambon, A. C., Hosangadi, A., & Calhoon Jr, W. H. (2018). CRUNCH CFD® Turbulent Combustion Modeling Capabilities for Rocket Engine Applications. 한국추진공학회 학술대회논문집, 131-142.12. Durand, J. E., Lestrade, J. Y., & Anthoine, J. (2019, July). Fuel Regression Modelling for Hybrid Rocket CFD Simulations. In EUCASS 2019.13. Máxima, K., Martins, P. G. C., & Carneiro, S. H. S. (2017). MODAL ANALYSIS OF GUARANI I EXPERIMENTAL ROCKET.
to $500,000 In 2019.” [Online]. Available: https://cybersecurityventures.com/career-news/. [Accessed: 18-Dec-2019].[11] “Cybersecurity is heading into a recruitment crisis: Here’s how we fix the problem | ZDNet.” [Online]. Available: https://www.zdnet.com/article/cybersecurity-is-heading-into- a-recruitment-crisis-heres-how-we-fix-the-problem/. [Accessed: 26-Nov-2019].[12] “State of Cybersecurity 2019 Part 1: Current Trends in Workforce Development,” 2019.[13] B. Nelson, “Computer science: Hacking into the cyberworld,” Nature, vol. 506, no. 7489, pp. 517–519, Feb. 2014.[14] “2018 State of Computer Science Education Policy and Implementation Advocacy Coalition.”[15] “Only 3 Percent Of U.S. Bachelor’s Degree Grads Have
195 causes and solutions. International Journal of Integrated Engineering, 10(1). [4] Karayaka, H. B., & Adams, R. (2015). The evaluation of a new VI. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK. hybrid flipped classroom approach to teaching power electronics. As academics we recognize we must wear three hats. The Global Journal of Engineering Education, 17(2), 61-69. [5] Power Quality Teaching Tool by Power Standards Lab
; Blackburn, K. (2015). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC 2015. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin.7. Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). The broaden–and–build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1367-1377.8. Conway, A. M., Tugade, M. M., Catalino, L. I., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions: Form, function and mechanisms. I Boniwell, S.A. David, and A.C. Ayers (Eds.) Oxford handbook of happiness, (pp. 17-34). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press9. Taraban, R., Pittman, J., Nalabandian, T., Yang, W. F. Z., Marcy, W. M., & Gunturu, S. M. (2019). Creating and testing
suggested but may be substituted for biology.Interestingly, ME/IE-majored students showed relatively high motivation (comparable to theBioE/BME group) both before and after the program (Figure 3B). When it comes to the CarterAcademy program exit survey, 69% (2019), 64 % (2018) and 62 % (2017) of the studentsindicated that they gained a good sense of what to expect during the academic year comparedwith 40 % of those in summer 2016.Figure 2. Student pre-course and exit motivation survey results with Q5 scores reversed.Error bars represent the standard deviations.Figure 3. Student pre-course and exit exam survey results based on their majors. Errorbars represent the standard deviations. A: average cores of Q4-11 with Q5 scores reversed;B: Q11 only.In
Simulation,” buildsim. [Online]. Available: https://www.buildsim.io/. [Accessed: 30-Jan-2020].[10]. “WINNERS ANNOUNCED Energy Modeling Olympiad 2019,” The Energy Simulation Academy. [Online]. Available: https://simulate.energy/blog/77352/olympiad2019. [Accessed: 30-Jan-2020].[11]. P. B. Cobbinah, E. Gaisie, N. Y. Oppong-Yeboah, and D. O. Anim, “Kumasi: Towards a sustainable and resilient cityscape,” Cities, vol. 97, p. 102567, 2020.[12]. F. Abdelfattah, “Sustainable development practices and its effect on green buildings,” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 410, p. 012065, 2020.[13]. N. Chalfoun, O. Youssef, E. Engy "Research, development, and optimization of schematic
. O. Obare and J. H. Hageman, “The power and promise of early research,” American Chemical Society, vol. 1231, 2016, ISBN13: 9780841231733, eISBN: 9780841231726, DOI: 10.1021/bk-2016-1231.[3] N. H. Hensel and B. D. Cejda, “Tapping the potential of all, undergraduate research at community colleges,” The Council on Undergraduate Research, 2014 ISBN: 0-941933-50-4.[4] J. Gentile, K. Brenner and A. Stephens, “Undergraduate research experiences for STEM students: Successes, challenges, and opportunities,” The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, The National Academies Press. 2017, doi: 10.17226/24622.[5] T. Landefeld, , “Community college students: An untapped source of future
individual StudentAccount through two options- (a) Paying USD 14.00 per month with no contract or (b)Purchasing a year’s access for USD 99.00. Alternatively, they can use the university’sEducational License Account at USD 25.00 per year. SkyCiv software provides resources suchas tutorials and featured projects. One of the main benefits of the software is that it also givesdetailed reporting of the calculations, similar to hand calculations, thus enabling students toverify their hand solutions. Additionally, many reinforced concrete, steel, and wood structuraldesign codes are fully integrated in the software and hence can be used in structural designcourses as well.Courses Selected for SkyCiv ApplicationACT 201 Structural Analysis: This course
serves on the Editorial Boards of Transportation Research Part B and Transportation Research Part C.Dr. Stephanie Cutler, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Stephanie Cutler has a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Her dissertation explored faculty adoption of research-based instructional strategies in the statics classroom. Currently, Dr. Cutler works as an assessment and instructional support specialist with the Leonhard Center for the Enhance- ment of Engineering Education at Penn State. She aids in the educational assessment of faculty-led projects while also supporting instructors to improve their teaching in the classroom. Previously, Dr. Cutler worked as the research specialist with the
. manufacturing: 2015 and beyond,” 2015.2. Spak, G.T., “US advanced manufacturing skills gap: Innovation education solutions,” 4th International Conference on New Horizons in Education, Elsevier, 2013.3. Kimmel, H., Carpinelli, J., Burr-Alexander, L., and Rockland, R., “Bringing Engineering into K-12 Schools: A Problem Looking for Solutions,” American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2006.4. Sharma, S., Siwach, B., Ghoshal, S.K. and Mohan, D., “Dye sensitized solar cells: From genesis to recent drifts,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 70, 2007, pp. 529- 537.5. Gonçalves, L.M., de Zea Bermudez, V., Ribeiro, H.A. and Mendes, A.M., “Dye-sensitized solar cells: A safe bet for the future
., Zou, Y., Anderson, G.J.,Han, J., Chang, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, C., Chen, L., Zhou, G., Nie, G., Yan, H., Ding, B., and Zhao,Y. (2018) A DNA nanorobot functions as a cancer therapeutic in response to a molecular triggerin vivo. Nature Biotechnol. 36:258–264.[13] S. Herrera, A. Serrano, D. Arroyo, A. Alvarez-Loya, M. Rasche, N. Robson, “Developmentof a DNA Nano-robot for Chemotherapeutic Drug Delivery”, Dimensions: The Journal ofUndergraduate Research in Natural Sciences and Mathematics, v. 21, 2019.
Paper ID #31465Outcomes and Assessment of Three Years of an REU Site in Multi-ScaleSystems BioengineeringDr. Timothy E. Allen, University of Virginia Dr. Timothy E. Allen is an Associate Professor in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Virginia. He received a B.S.E. in Biomedical Engineering at Duke University and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Bioengineering at the University of California, San Diego. Dr. Allen’s teaching activities include coordinating the core undergraduate teaching labs and the Capstone Design sequence in the BME department at the University of Virginia, and his research interests
Paper ID #29180Development and Teacher Perceptions of an Avatar-Based Performance Taskfor Elementary Teachers to Practice Post-Testing ArgumentationDiscussions in Engineering Design (RTP)Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue Ph.D., Towson University Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue, Ph.D., is Professor of Science and Engineering Education in the Department of Physics, Astronomy and Geosciences at Towson University. She has a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering, worked briefly as a process engineer, and taught high school physics and pre-engineering. She has taught engineering and science to children in multiple formal and informal settings
Freire’s main works [12], [29], anengineer capable of GE must be an educator engineer, someone with empathy and critical sense,capable of dialoguing, and opened (and able) to learn with non-schooled people and from non-academic knowledge.Why exactly does GE demand an educator engineer? This leads to the second unanimity amongGE teams: the non-neutrality of technology. To address this point, we must acknowledge that, aspresented elsewhere [1]: a) every technical challenge can usually be addressed through differenttechnical solutions; b) each technical solution necessarily favors or emulates some (set of)ethical-political values over others; c) because of “a” and “b,” society and technology shape oneanother in a way that d) technical development and
Paper ID #29065Incorporating Diversity and Inclusion in the Computing ClassroomDr. Bridget Benson, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Bridget Benson received a Bachelor’s degree in Computer Engineering at California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obipso in 2005, a Master’s degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of California Santa Barbara in 2007 and a PhD degree in the Computer Science and Engi- neering at the University of California San Diego in 2010. She is currently an Associate Professor in the Electrical Engineering Department at California Polytechnic State
WORKFORCE EMPLOYER NEEDS 2020 ASEE Engineering Deans Public Policy ColloquiumProprietary:The information contained herein is proprietary to The Boeing Company and shall not be reproduced or disclosed in whole or in part or used for any reason except when such user possesses direct, written authorization from The Boeing Company.The statements contained herein are based on good faith assumptions and provided for general information purposes only. These statements do not constitute an offer, promise, warranty or guarantee of performance. Actual results may varydepending on certain events or conditions. This document should not b e used or relied upon for any purpose other than that i ntended by Boeing
be directly measured. Except for Q2, the treatmentgroup took slightly longer than the control group. T-test results show that the difference between (a) Number of Submissions (b) Time (in minutes) between a student’s First and Last Attempt Figure 2: Submission Details per Questionthe groups was statistically significant for Q2(p=0.019), Q4(p=0.003), Q7(p=0.004) andQ8(p=0.04). So the treatment group had more submissions on the Apply and Analyze-typequestions and also took longer to complete.Code Quality (RQ2)We also inspected the quality of the students solutions. The solutions for Analyze and Apply typeexercises results in very similar solutions
.[7] A. Al-Bayati, M. Namian, and K. Alomari, “Construction Stakeholders’ Perception toward the Success Factors of Construction Projects.” Canadian Society for Civil Engineering (CSCE) 2019.[8] D. P. Gilkey, C. L. D. Puerto, T. Keefe, P. Bigelow, R. Herron, J. Rosecrance, and P. Chen, “Comparative Analysis of Safety Culture Perceptions among HomeSafe Managers and Workers in Residential Construction,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 138, no. 9, pp. 1044–1052, 2012.[9] E. Jazayeri, H. Liu and G. B. Dadi, “Perception differences between contractors and owners regarding drivers of construction safety.” Journal of Safety Engineering, 6(2): 29-39 DOI: 10.5923/j.safety.20170602.02, 2017.[10] J. Dawes
Week No. Topic 1 Study of extreme environments and planetary conditions (Earth, Moon and Mars) 2 Infrastructure planning and transportation 3 Potential sites and in-situ resources 4 Health, well-being, safety, and comfort 5 Energy efficiency of structures 6 Overview of outer space structures and habitat case studies (built and unbuilt) 7 - 12 Habitat Design A. Habitat types and program requirements B. Deployable structures i. Geometric design and connection detailing ii. Optimal structures: packaging
. This first year will serve as a pilot to gain insight and feedback into the survey andassignment.Below is the table containing KEEN framework category [3], KEEN related course outcomes[4], and the artifact(s) that will be used to assess each outcome. Appendix B provides theInstructor/Peer Video Rubric and Self-Reflection Rubric and appendix C contains the surveysgiven to the students. Category of KEEN KEEN Related Course Assessment Plan Related Course Outcome [4] Outcome [3] Related to Curiosity Take ownership of, and express Grade on Video interest in topic/expertise/project. Communication Present technical information Grade from rubric on these portions
engineering educator might be expected to possess. This has profoundimplications for the design of future courses for beginning teachers of engineering and alliedsubjects.(b) Findings related to becoming a professional engineering educatorOne of us (John) was much affected by the fact that much of the discussion seemed to focus onthe personal problems of the teacher, in particular the teaching versus research conflict. Itseemed there were no lines of accountability and that everything was governed by a strongmotivation to write papers to be published in internationally peer reviewed journals. He alsonoted a similarity with the problems faced by the beginning schoolteacher and considered thatthe workshop should have begun with a discussion of
." 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2019.[9] J. Love, et al. “No Lab? No Shop? No Problem: Intentional Design of a First year Engineering Learning Centerwith Enlightening Outcomes.” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, Washington. Vol. 10. 2015.[10] Terranova, B., L. Khuon, and A. Fontecchio. "Makerspaces First: A First-year Engineering Program in anAcademic Makerspace." Proceedings of 2017 International Symposium on Academic Makerspaces. 2017.[11] A. Borgaonkar, J. Sodhi, and L. Alkhoury. “Integrating Makerspace in First-Year Engineering Curriculum.”2019 FYEE Conference. 2019.Appendix
) Feeling of inclusion, (5) Coping self-efficacy, and (6) Math outcomes efficacy. The subscaletitled “Engineering self-efficacy 1” indicates a student’s perception of their ability to earn an Aor B in physics, math, and engineering courses and succeed in an engineering curriculum whilenot giving up participation in their outside interests. “Engineering self-efficacy 2” indicates thestudent’s perception of their ability to complete (but not necessarily obtain an A or B)engineering requirements such as math, physics, chemistry and also their general ability tosucceed in any engineering major.The MSLQ was created by researchers at the School of Education at the University of Michigan[6].The 1991 version of the MSLQ consists of 81 questions resulting
Knowledge Worker inthe Dual Space of Engineering Knowledge and Rhetorical Process” Writing in Knowledge Societies, pp.321-350, 2011[13] Devitt, Amy., Writing Genres, Carbondale: Southern Illinois Press, 2004, pp. 1-32[14] Swales, John M., Feak, Christine B., Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks andSkills, 3rd Edition, The University of Michigan, pp. 17-37, 2012[15] Kmiec, David and Longo, Bernadette, The IEEE Guide to Writing in the Engineering and TechnicalFields IEEE Press Wiley, 2017[16] Smit, David, The End of Composition Studies. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 2007[17] Bazerman, Charles, “‘Genre and Cognitive Development” Genre in a Changing World Fort Collins,CO: Parlor Press, pp. 279-294, 2011[18] Irish, Robert, Writing
Statistics," Statist. Sci., vol. 24, pp. 1-14, 2009/02 2009.[9] D. Moher, F. Naudet, I. A. Cristea, F. Miedema, J. P. Ioannidis, and S. N. Goodman, "Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure," PLoS biology, vol. 16, p. e2004089, 2018.[10] M. G. Siegel, J. C. Brand, M. J. Rossi, and J. H. Lubowitz, "“Publish or perish” promotes medical literature quantity over quality," ed: Elsevier, 2018.[11] B. Brembs, K. Button, and M. Munafò, "Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank," Frontiers in human Neuroscience, vol. 7, p. 291, 2013.[12] D. R. Grimes, C. T. Bauch, and J. P. Ioannidis, "Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure," Royal Society Open Science, vol. 5, p
students andtheir non-URM peers, which starts early on in lower-division math and science courses as thesecourses build the foundation for upper-division ECS courses. a) NATURAL SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS b) CIVIL & ENVIORONMENTAL ENGINEERING 50 50 URM STUDENTS URM STUDENTS