human-centered and context informed approach. As examples: studentsin a narrow frame may come up with the solution of installing self-checkout machines (solutiontype), use Target as an example (store context), voice concerns about security in a low incomeneighborhood (construction of people), and prioritize the store’s financial bottom line (values).Alternatively, students in an expansive frame may design a way to order groceries with digitaland analog options (solution type), refer to personal experiences working in retail or living indifferent communities (store context), attend to the needs of a variety of stakeholders(construction of people), and foreground public health or employee rights in the design (values).The four themes that define
, Gulf Coast Center for Addressing Microplastic Pollution (GC-CAM), and the founding faculty advisor for the Society of Sustainable Engineering. He teaches a mixture of undergraduate and graduate engineering courses. Dr. Wu is a committee member for Transportation Research Board (TRB) AJE35 and AKM 90, a member of American Society of Civil Engineer (ASCE), American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), and Academy of Pavement Science and Engineering (APSE), as well as an editorial member for Journal of Testing and Evaluation and International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology. He serves panel member for several NCHRP and ACRP projects. He is also a registered professional engineer in Alabama and LEED
supervising graduate students in dynamics and control systems. He was awarded the Early Career Teaching Excellence Award in 2007 from the Faculty of Engineering.© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Award in 2007 from the Faculty of Engineering. Page 14.736.2© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Innovation and Integration in an In-house First-Year Engineering Program: A fast track to Engineering EnculturationAbstractThe first-year of the four-year Bachelor of Engineering (Honours) program at the Universityof Auckland has been taught entirely in-house by the School of Engineering since 1996,when university-wide structural
in engineering shaped by concerns about financialsecurity. For Research Question # 2: “To what extent did the military influence the decision tomajor in engineering?” two themes emerged from our analysis. Theme 1: Military experiencesinfluenced the decision to major in engineering. Theme 2: Military experiences did not have adirect influence on the decision to major in engineering.Advisory Board meeting: A conference call was held in January 2016 and an in-personmeeting was held in San Diego, CA on the USD campus on June 17, 2016. We have workedextensively with our distinguished External Advisory Board (EAB) which includes a recentstudent veteran engineering graduate, an engineering faculty member who has done research onsupporting student
role of faculty, practitioners, and students in imparting the BOK by means of B+M/30 programs. Seek input from and support for the preceding from forward-looking academics and practitioners.The Committee defined the BOK as the knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary to become alicensed professional civil engineer. The BOK would be fulfilled by a carefully integratedcombination of pre-licensure formal education and pre-licensure experience. PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to present the recommendations of the BOK Committee and tointroduce the curricula design project, the current phase of BOK development. For
team. This structure, combined with long-term participation,enables an organizational structure to the teams. Students begin early in their academic programin a supportive, apprenticeship, mentor/mentee role in which they learn from more seniorstudents. Over time, students grow into leadership roles, sustaining peer-to-peer learningrelationships with newer members. Through long-term engagement, students have time to gaininsights and develop proficiency with the various yet interrelated activities of engineering designon a project that has real-world implications.The VIP team objectives range from faculty-embedded research and discovery efforts toentrepreneurial and service product development to industry-sponsored design competitions.Students
, universities have responded to thesechallenges by adding more design content and introducing more open-ended design problemsinto their engineering curricula. Articles discussing the guarded success of these initiatives haveappeared in nearly every issue of the Journal of Engineering Education and the InternationalJournal of Engineering Education over the last 10 years. Yet the need to increase the creativepotential of graduates still persists.11 In fact, our preliminary results confirm this.Recognizing that other factors play a role as well, studies have documented (1) that peoplewhose personality types indicate high levels of creative potential are leaving engineering athigher rates than the student body average and (2) faculty teaching methods lean
electrical power is critical. For an Instrumentation Control Systems EngineeringTechnology (ICET) Program at Louisiana Tech University, hands-on projects are consistentlythreaded throughout the curriculum resulting in graduates who can design, plan, research, evaluate,test and implement electrical and electromechanical systems that span multiple engineeringdisciplines.To push the curriculum and its graduates forward, ICET faculty members are empowered tocontinuously develop and improve activities and projects for core courses. In Spring of 2022, asystems-level project was integrated into the sophomore-level Applied Thermodynamics course.A thermoelectric cooling system (TeCS) was developed in-house to allow students to experienceand measure
paper describes the survey results.Engineering students and faculty members in the audience were asked about theirperceptions of the educational value of the competition for both the competitors and theaudience members. They were also asked about their perceptions of the personalcharacteristics of the competitors. As this research project was funded through anInstructional Enhancement Grant, the goal was to examine the perceived educationalvalue of Idol. This examination aims to help identify ways learning and teaching are –and can be further – enhanced through Idol.Overall, the results of the survey pointed to an overwhelmingly positive response to thepresentation competition and the educational value it provides. The engineering studentsand
identitybecause of her experiences and observations as a woman of color in engineering education. JoelAlejandro (Alex) Mejia identifies as Latino and is a tenure-track faculty member at apredominantly White institution with a religious affiliation in the Pacific West. He becameinterested in issues of race and social justice because of his transnational experiences, and hisjourney as an engineer working for the military and mining industries. As does everyone, weeach inhabit different additional intersections of social identity than those we have identifiedhere.MethodWe initiated this paper after participating in ASEE 2017 in Columbus, OH. One of us attendedsessions by the other two of us, and thought that we might share an interest in exploring the
(2022) Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education (2024)Student enrollment and graduation rates at the undergraduate level are critical in determining thedollar amounts provided when considering external funding, including state-based funding,federal funding, and private-sector investing. While the number of undergraduate studentsdoesn’t directly impact the index calculation, an institution's ability to recruit and retain studentswho can conduct year-round undergraduate research for faculty, for example, has broaderimplications for faculty members' ability to complete their research goals, apply for grants, off-set teaching requirements (typically higher at R2 and R3 teaching-centered institutions) and
universally accepted intercultural competence assessmentinstrument that can be used in every context does not exist. Our decision to use the IDI for ourquantitative analysis is rooted in our belief that the development of intercultural competence is aprogressive and ongoing process [2], [34], [35]. The IDI is recognized as a cross-nationallyvalidated psychometric instrument developed based upon Milton Bennett’s DMIS that spansfrom monocultural orientations to intercultural orientations to cultural differences. Theinstrument provides an indication of respondents’ predominant orientation to cultural differences,referred to as their Developmental Orientation. The IDI is well established as an instrument tomeasure student gains in intercultural
tosupport the development of self-understanding needed to make academic and personal decisions.During Fall 2018 and Fall 2019, the course enrolled 300-350 students each semester and utilizeda single lecture, single discussion session format each week. The lecture portion of the coursewas led by two faculty instructors and focused upon faculty presentations intended to introducestudents to different engineering disciplines, majors and careers, along with guestpresentations/panels intended to explore broader perspectives of engineering and the engineeringstudent experience. The discussion portion of the course, led by upper-level undergraduateengineering students, focused on the introduction of experiential learning opportunities, as wellas topics
. Traveling abroad required the projectteams to work together to accomplish their goals even as they changed throughout the trip. Theunpredictability of working in a new, foreign environment meant they had to be flexible andaccommodating to unforeseen circumstances. This required each member to contribute, worktogether, and take on responsibilities that often involved doing new things and being in situationsthey were uncomfortable.Being abroad presented personal challenges and often the more experienced project membershelped others work through these challenges. Seeing cultures with living conditions so differentfrom their own can be startling but ultimately students responded with an increased sense ofresponsibility to put their engineering
underpinning principles and ethosadhered to by engineers in research, academia, and industry. Subsequent classes were team-taughtby the MEE faculty in concert with five practicing engineers from local industry. Faculty membersshared their careers as research engineers, and practicing engineers exposed students to projectsencountered in the professional workplace.Participating engineers from industry and government were recruited from local companies throughthree techniques: personal contacts made at university-sponsored conferences and career fairs;telephone calls to local firms’ outreach coordinators; and members of the industrial advisory boardof the College of Engineering. Practicing engineers generally responded favorably to requests toshare their
research is focused on engineering education. She has over twenty years of experience in automotive manufacturing as an Engineer and Manager. She has worked directly at every phase of the design process from concept to manufacture to service. She has a B.S. in industrial engineering from Kettering University and an M.S. in applied statistics from Oakland University. Dietrich taught statistics at the University of Phoenix where she was awarded Outstanding Faculty. She is also a member of the Phi Kappa Phi and Epsilon Pi Tau honor societies. Page 25.913.1 c American Society for
form individual academic identities. In this manner,learning becomes more about the individual and less about the course.Mini-project scaffoldingThe first few mini-projects in a series are typically team-based and meant to build confidence infoundational concepts. Each subsequent project builds on the previous, culminating in studentscompleting individual mini-projects. The removal of scaffolds over time relies on the assumptionthat students are adapting to, and developing strategies for, these tasks, meaning that as theydevelop as problem solvers, they become capable of better exploring and planning within anopen-ended space. Indeed, students seem to derive a sense of personal accomplishment fromdoing this work, which may motivate and
touched me that I eventually joined not just theprogram but also the GCSP steering committee.Nestled in the suburbs of Boston., Olin is often considered to be a bubble. With fewer than 90students in each graduating class, very few cultures have strong representation in the studentbody and it can be a challenging place to expand your worldview. Many students choose to studyabroad during their junior year but for those of us who are still on campus, there aren’t manyopportunities to engage with other cultures, particularly implied in the definition of MulticulturalCompetency within the GCSP framework. Olin's GCSP steering committee, that includesstudents and faculty, made a decision that one of the ways in which we can address
analysis of Department of Energy nuclear facilities and systems. She has established an active research lab at SFSU with a diverse group of undergraduate and Master’s level students. For her engineering education research, she is interested in exploring how to use technology such as virtual reality and 3D printing to enhance student engagement. She is an active member of ASCE, ASEE, and SEAONC.Dr. Yiyi Wang, San Francisco State University Yiyi Wang is an assistant professor of civil engineering at San Francisco State University. In addition to engineering education, her research also focuses on the nexus between mapping, information technology, and transportation and has published in Accident Analysis & Prevention
estimate the competency of faculty within an institution by their individualacademic credentials, number, or amount of grants as well as the number of conferences and peerreviewed articles, citation count of each article, or the impact factor of the journal in which thearticles are published. While it certainly has its own concerns, the h-index is still the mostcommon measure of an individual researchers measure of both citation impact and productivity[4]. Next, for an individual student one may determine competence by combined information oftheir degrees, the awarding institutions, and the grade point average (GPA) for each degree [5].How can industry compare engineering graduates from different institutions in differentcountries, much less
-traditional channels, given that thesocial science students will unlikely encounter the internship information through science andengineering publications.International Winter School for Graduate StudentsThe International Winter Schools for Graduate Students (iWSG) are organized jointly by NNINand institutions in third world countries with the goal of promoting international bridge buildingand understanding by bringing together students and faculty in an intense teaching and societalexperience. Each year, 10 graduate students and faculty participate in a rigorous course in anemerging and research-intensive interdisciplinary direction that is not part of U.S. graduatecurriculums. This lasts six days and includes laboratory sections, followed by travel
cameout that some faculty members were already allowing students to use these calculators. Afterdiscussion, the faculty voted to move forward with this proposal.Next, the department sought input from other constituent groups: industrial employers throughthe department’s Industrial Advisory Board, alumni, and current students.As representatives of companies in the region who hire our students and graduates, thedepartment sought input from our Industrial Advisory Board (IAB). With the IAB, thedepartment used surveys as well as discussions in IAB meetings.The proposal was presented and discussed at an IAB meeting on April 30th, 2021. A separate setof minutes covered this part of the meeting. The question put to the IAB members was this:would
education and his M.S. in electrical and computer engineering, both from Purdue University. He received his bachelor’s in computer engineering at Harding University.Mr. Kanembe Shanachilubwa, Harding University I am an undergraduate mechanical engineering major anticipating graduation in May of 2019. I am a member of the Beyond Professional Identity research group based in Harding University located in Searcy, Arkansas. I plan to further my studies in engineering education in graduate school particularly in regards to equipping students to work in development and sustainability.Dr. Stephen Secules, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Stephen received a PhD in education at the University of
teaching portfolios designed primarily for self-reflection. Page 11.1219.9Additional resources about teaching portfolios may be found through the Carnegie Foundationfor the Advancement of Teaching9.In summary, our analysis revealed three primary reasons why institutions of higher educationencourage and support graduate students and faculty to develop and maintain teaching portfolios.These reasons include (a) for assessment – using teaching portfolios in applications for facultyjobs, or tenure and promotion; (b) as an instructional intervention – preparing graduate studentsfor faculty careers using the Preparing Future Faculty (PFF) model; or (c) as
practice, inwhich ‘design’ denotes the systematic selection and articulation of components into an overallsystem. An example may be the typical design of the components of a commercial heating andventilation system, the design of the structural members of a building, or the design of hardwareand software components for a given functionality. Although each scenario allows for a numberof acceptable designs, early-career engineers are generally acculturated into a professionalpractice environment in which a ‘right answer’ or ‘best answer’ is defined based on establisheddesign codes and standards, engineering precedent, and business practices related to maintainingprofitability of the design endeavour.Finally, many design engineers express frustration
. This is hugely significant and successful and surprising, asstudents in a projects course have lectures on prototyping, manufacturing, and other “cool”hands-on topics. For a large group of mostly 18-19 year-olds to show overwhelming interest inEngineering Ethics is a victory for the instructors.ConclusionsThis small study on ethics in a first-year engineering projects course provides insights toinstructors teaching the courses and leaves room for future exploration. One overall, broadtakeaway is that the Ethics lectures are popular and successful. The case study theme and layoutof the lectures captivates students’ interest and they are often able to make connections from themajor event to their own career as an Engineer.These Ethics lectures
remove the neutraldumping ground and require students, faculty, and advisory board members to choose a side.The institutional review board (IRB) approved the study prior to solicitation. An email was sentout to inform each focus group of the survey subject matter, the format, the approximate time tocomplete it, and provided an anonymous link employing Qualtrics. The email also disclosed thatno monetary or financial reward would be gained through participation and that participation wascompletely voluntary. Once published, the surveys remained open for 2 weeks. The goal of thestudy was to identify critical student and program needs for the space in support of an internalLearning Environment Grant and to prioritize improvements based on available
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Military-Bound and Veteran Student Views on Socially Responsible EngineeringAbstractThis research explored the perspectives of engineering students on the relationship betweenservice in the military and views of social responsibility as engineers, in particular professionalconnectedness or the obligation that an engineer has to help solve social problems or help othersusing their professional skills. Three research questions (RQs) were examined: (1) How does theprofessional connectedness of engineering students attending a military academy compare tostudents at other institutions? (2) How do engineering students with military aspirations
flexibility, inclusiveness,knowledge sharing, interdependence, networking, a safe environment, skills development,personal growth, and friendships [17]. The inclusion of professional competency workshopscoupled with a peer-to-peer mentoring framework is considered to enrich the engineeringexperience through a supportive and personalized learning environment.Objectives and scope of workThe goal of this study is to investigate an engineering education model that can help to transformthe first-year experience of engineering students and impact their career preparedness, academicmotivation, persistence, and professional competencies. The primary objective of this work-in-progress paper is to report the preliminary findings from incorporating professional
formalaccommodations fail to remove all barriers. Student interviews informed this paper’srecommendations to improve their access to education, especially when implemented together.Recommendations include both instructor- and administrative-level supports.II. METHODSA. Positionality Both authors hold engineering degrees and identify as white, disabled women. The firstauthor, whose disability affects her cognitive function, energy, and mobility, is working towardsa graduate engineering degree. This research came to fruition out of the frustration we felt afterthe first author experienced numerous barriers to accommodations and faculty support during herfirst year of graduate school. We are motivated by this experience to increase accessibility