action to transform the world, andreflection plays an important role in deep learning [6, 7]. Taken all together, this course sought toemploy context-rich, interdisciplinary, and reflective approaches to engineering education.Example Course on Sustainable MaterialsThe curricular design for Sustainable Materials is one answer to how to put the (social andenvironmental) ‘context’ into context-rich engineering problems. A curricular overview is presented inTable B1 (Appendix B), including the four units of the course and the summative assignments for eachunit. Units 1 and 4 provide scaffolding and reflection (i.e. the “context richness”) for the engineeringwork done in Units 2 and 3. Unit 1: Towards a Collective Definition of ‘Sustainability’ in
ableism among faculty and staff,” Disabilities, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 178–203, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.3390/disabilities2020014.[7] B. Blaser, C. Bennett, R. E. Ladner, S. E. Burgstahler, and J. Mankoff, “Perspectives of Women with Disabilities in Computing,” in Cracking the Digital Ceiling: Women in Computing Around the World, C. Frieze and J. L. Quesenberry, Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019, pp. 159–182.[8] T. Titchkosky, E. Cagulada, M. DeWelles, and E. Gold, Disappearing: Encounters in Disability Studies. Toronto, ON, CA: Canadian Scholars, 2022.[9] E. E. Andrews, A. J. Forber-Pratt, L. R. Mona, E. M. Lund, C. R. Pilarski, and R. Balter, “#saytheword: A disability culture commentary on the
, and J.-C. Liang, “Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education,” Comput. Educ., vol. 62, pp. 41–49, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024.[7] S. Cai, X. Wang, and F.-K. Chiang, “A case study of Augmented Reality simulation system application in a chemistry course,” Comput. Hum. Behav., vol. 37, pp. 31–40, Aug. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.018.[8] M. Constan and N. Ciubotaru, “Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality in Education,” Virtual Real. Educ., pp. 1–12, 2017.[9] S. K. Gogula, S. D. Gogula, and C. Puranam, “Augmented Reality in Enhancing Qualitative Education,” Int. J. Comput. Appl., vol. 132, no. 14, pp. 41–45, Dec. 2015.[10] J. Byrnes and B. A. Wasik, “Picture This
some groups ofpeople over others. Below, we describe each argument and analyze what common narratives thestudents are pushing back against by using that argument.A note on the missing AI-human comparison: There are two common arguments for using AIinstead of humans for hiring: (a) that humans are biased, while computers do not see physicalcharacteristics, so must not be biased, and (b) that machines can do this process more efficiently,at a much larger scale than humans can do manually. In both groups’ discussions, we see nods toreasoning (b) (turns 1.2 and 2.2), but neither of the recorded discussions nor any of these sevenstudents’ written pre-responses mention hiring done by humans. However, both groups mentionexamples, like the practice of
, Eds.Neuroscience, 6th ed., Oxford University Press, 2018[8] M. Walker, Why we sleep: unlocking the power of sleep and dreams, Scribner, New York. 2018[9] J. G. Jenkins and K. M. Dallenbach, “Oblivescence during sleep and waking,” American Journal ofPsychology, 35(4), 605-612, 1924.[10] B. L. Smarr and A. E. Schirmer, “3.2 million real-world learning management system logins revealthe majority of students experience social jet lag correlated with decreased performance,”Scientific Reports, 8, 4793, 2018, doi:10.1038/s41598-018-23044-8.[11] S. Blakemore, “The social brain in adolescence,” Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 9, 267-277, April2008.[12] C. Sandi, “Stress and cognition,” Cognitive Science, 4, 245-261, May/June 2013.[13] C. Sandi, “Stress, cognitive
that is meaningful and attractive to minority engineers.AcknowledgmentsIn part, we would like to thank NSF, ASEE eFellows program for funding to conduct this workalong with PRE-CCAP project funding by DOE/NNSA grant no. DE-NA0004051. We wouldlike to personally thank Dr. Boesl and the other members of the PRE-CAPP team at FloridaInternational University along with the students in the REDES research group for their continuedsupport in our work with PRE-CCAP.ReferencesBriscoe, J. P., & Hall, D. T. (2006). The interplay of boundaryless and protean careers:Combinations and implications. Journal of vocational behavior, 69(1), 4-18.Brunhaver, S. R., Jesiek, B. K., Korte, R. F., & Strong, A. C. (2021). The Early Career Years ofEngineering
-Friedmann, G. Sonnert, P. M. Sadler, and Z. Hazari, "Out-of-school time science activities and their association with career interest in STEM," International Journal of Science Education, Part B, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 63-79, 2012/03/01 2012, doi: 10.1080/21548455.2011.629455.[2] R. George, "A cross‐domain analysis of change in students’ attitudes toward science and attitudes about the utility of science," International Journal of Science Education, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 571-589, 2006/05/12 2006, doi: 10.1080/09500690500338755. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings[3] (September 2021). Best practices for diversity and
Burnin’! Agency, Identity, and Science Learning,” Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 187–229, Apr. 2010, doi: 10.1080/10508400903530044.[13] C. I. Damşa, P. A. Kirschner, J. E. B. Andriessen, G. Erkens, and P. H. M. Sins, “Shared Epistemic Agency: An Empirical Study of an Emergent Construct,” Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 143–186, Apr. 2010, doi: 10.1080/10508401003708381.[14] A. Pickering, The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, & Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1995.[15] V. Svihla, N. Kellam, and S. Davis, “The Consequential Agency of Faculty Seeking to Make Departmental Change,” in American Society of Engineering Education Conference
Integrity Code(MIC)) and confirmation.Exercise 4: WPA3 AES Mode CMAC MIC Verification of the EAPOL-M2 using WPA KCKIn WPA3 (with IEEE 802.11w being mandatory), the MIC is computed using the WPA Key Con-firmation Key (KCK) in the case of the EAPOL-M2 unicast frame (see Figure 8). Figure 8: AES Mode CMAC MIC Verification with KCK in WPA3 EAPOL-M2 [26].The students are to identify the EAPOL-M2 message in a 4-way handshake that is captured byWireshark. The MIC value of the EAPOL-M2 becomes the wTarget. The payload to be used forcomputing the MIC value should have the MIC string replaced with zeros. The KCK is extractedfrom the logs. The students are to compute the cTarget using the Python script (AES-128 MODECMAC implementation) provided in B.2.1
-centered cubic crystal structure: a) A hard-sphere unit cell representation, b) A reduced sphere unit cell, and c) An aggregate of many atoms [1]The materials science course at our school has a physical lab related to this topic. In this lab,ping-pong balls are used to represent atoms, and adhesive is used to connect them together basedon the definitions of a given crystal structure. This lab significantly helped students to developspatial skills and an understanding of typical crystal structures. Based on observations anddiscussions over the past several years, it was found that some students still had difficulty 1understanding the basic concepts of typical crystal structures. We
, on the opposite side as the safety tie. This line marked the lap joint area forbioadhesive testing (Figure 1A). Students applied a constant volume of either of the bioadhesivesto the lap joint area, then adhered two chamois together at the lap joint. To vary the drying time,students briefly applied heat using a hairdryer, then let samples dry at room temperature for up to30 min.Figure 1. Representative bioadhesive testing procedure and student data demonstratingsuccessful adhesion of chamois leather strips and lap-shear mechanical testing. (A) Leatherchamois strips with plastic safety ties. (B) Example of lap-shear mechanical testing procedureusing a luggage scale to measure force. (C) Graph of average force to failure for
Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings, Virtual Conference, jul. 2021, p. 36877, doi: 10.18260/1-2--36877 [Online]. Available in: http://peer.asee.org/36877.[8] R. M. Marra, K. A. Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, “Leaving Engineering: A Multi-Year Single Institution Study”, Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, n.o 1, pp. 6-27, ene. 2012, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00039.x. [Online]. Available in: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00039.x.[9] K. L. Lewis, J. G. Stout, S. J. Pollock, N. D. Finkelstein, and T. A. Ito, “Fitting in or opting out: A review of key social-psychological factors influencing a sense of belonging for women in physics”, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 12, n.o 2, p
. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 495-527. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883- 9026(99)00054-3Audretsch, D. B. (2014). From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 313-321.Baldini, N., Grimaldi, R., & Sobrero, M. (2007). To patent or not to patent? A survey of Italian inventors on motivations, incentives, and obstacles to university patenting. Scientometrics, 70(2), 333-354.Balven, R., Fenters, V., Siegel, D. S., & Waldman, D. (2018). Academic entrepreneurship: The roles of identity, motivation, championing, education, work-life balance, and organizational justice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1), 21
Paper ID #38168What Do Engineering and Other STEM Faculty Need? Exploring the Nu-ancesof Psychological NeedsDr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson is a professor of electrical engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. Her research interests in engineering education focus on the role of self-efficacy, belonging, and other non- cognitive aspects of the student experience on eDr. Jennifer J. VanAntwerp, Calvin University Jennifer J. VanAntwerp is a Professor of Engineering at Calvin University in Grand Rapids, Michigan. She earned an M.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University
the students listed had a LinkedIn business profile page. Using eachcompany profile, the company industry classification was also noted in Excel. Each companyself-identifies their industry on their LinkedIn profile page. This provides an objective method ofcategorizing the company industry, even when a company services multiple industries. Examplesof a company’s self-identified industry on LinkedIn are below. Figure 3(a)-(c) are examples ofautomotive industry company profiles. Figure 3: LinkedIn Profiles of (a) General Motors [22], (b) Gestamp [23], (c) Toyo Tires [24]Companies whose industry classification was “Motor Vehicle Manufacturing” or “Motor VehicleParts Manufacturing” or “Automotive” were lumped together to become the more
, “Service-learning and disaster recovery: Implications for government, communities, and colleges,” in Community engagement in higher education, Online-Ausg.in Pittsburgh Studies in Comparative and International Education. Rotterdam: SensePublishers, 2015, pp. 41–49.[12] T. Sescon, “Service Learning as a Response to Disasters and Social Development,” Japan Social Innovation Journal, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 64–71, 2012.[13] B. Steiner and R. Sands, “Responding to a Natural Disaster With Service Learning,” Family Medicine, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 645–649, 2000.[14] A. Solinska-Nowak et al., “An overview of serious games for disaster risk management – Prospects and limitations for informing actions to arrest increasing
engineering programs and which program activities or students' experiences havecontributed to the development of students’ stakeholder awareness. For example, it will be worth studyingthe impact of internships and/or extracurricular activities on such stakeholder awareness. In the same way,using the rubric for assessing its effectiveness when assessing students’ systems thinking while addressingdifferent scenarios or design projects, such as capstone design projects. 7REFERENCES[1] J. R. Grohs, G. R. Kirk, M. M. Soledad, and D. B. Knight, “Assessing systems thinking: A tool to measure complex reasoning through ill-structured problems
that chose to take the optional extra credit quiz across all sections andsemesters are treated equally by being separated into three groups based on their overall grade inthe class: Group 1 (A- or above), Group 2 (B- to B+), and Group 3 (C+ and below). For eachsemester, we calculated the average quiz score across groups, and compared the results andtrends visually as shown in Figure 1. Figure 1: Average quiz score of the three groups in each semesterIn Figure 1, we observed that students in Group 1 consistently scored higher on the quiz than theother two groups, except in Fall 2020 where they scored slightly lower than Group 2. However,the average quiz score for Group 1 was always an A (above 90%) across the four
scope of aproblem—a skill highly desired for its potential in innovation and entrepreneurship—fills a uniquecurricular gap. The survey of learning experiences showed statistically significant differencesbetween pre- and post-course scores in self-efficacies, which suggests that students sawimprovement in the ratings of their learning in five target areas: (A) background research skills,(B) critical thinking and ideation, (C) project management and teamwork, (D) technicalcommunication skills, and (E) interest in medical engineering.1. Introduction Current engineering education has well-established curricula that covers domain knowledge,mathematic skills, and engineering tools. Although education content and format have evolved,the general
several categories, which were subsequently analyzed and labeled as thematic learning processes [25] (see Tables 1 and 2 in the Appendices).• Developing memos: We created memos to further analyze and describe the themes and begin answering the research questions of what the participants learned and how they learned. These memos were the basis for the presentation of the findings in the next section.Findings 1: Student Learning Experiences in the Educational EcosystemFrom the analysis of the students’ interviews, we identified five main themes characterizing thelearning processes in their university engineering studies: (a) Learning the science andapplication of engineering; (b) Learning beyond engineering; (c) Learning the
, adapting the methodology to the students’ preferences andmeasuring its impact in the development of competences related to Six Sigma.AcknowledgementThe authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of Writing Lab, Institute for theFuture of Education, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico, in the production of this work.References[1] R. A. Munro, G. Ramu, and D. J. Zrymiak, The Certified Six Sigma Green Belt Handbook, 2nd edition. 2015.[2] ASQ, “Save Your Company a Fortune,” ASQ Six Sigma Business Solutions, 2009.[3] M. Kharub, B. Ruchitha, S. Hariharan, and N. Shanmukha Vamsi, “Profit enhancement for small, medium scale enterprises using Lean Six Sigma,” Mater Today Proc, vol. 56, pp. 2591–2595, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016
Paper ID #39319Board 2A: WIP:Opportunities in Cultural Dimensions between Architectureand Civil Engineering students in EcuadorDaniel Cartuchevictor R viteriDr. Miguel Andres Guerra, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ MiguelAndres is an Assistant Professor in the Polytechnic College of Science and Engineering at Uni- versidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ. He holds a BS in Civil Engineering from USFQ, a M.Sc. in Civil Engineering in Construction Engineering and Project Management from Iowa State University, a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering with emphasis in Sustainable Construction from Virginia Tech, and two Grad- uate
Ove Student Student Student Student Student m Project title rall A B C D E 1 Smart blind 4 4 4 4 4 X 2 Smart clock 3.8 3.8 3.8 3 3.8 3.8 3 Smart lock 4 4 4 X X X 4 Coin sorter 3.95 3.8 4 4 4 X 5 Smart pet feeder 3.93 4 4 3.8 X X 6 Smart bottle
Paper ID #39165Impact of critical narrative on students’ abilities to recognize ethicaldilemmas in engineering workDr. Jeff R. Brown, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach Jeff Brown is a professor of civil engineering at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Daytona Beach, FL. His research interests include ethics and professional formation in engineering education, service learning, and structural health monitoring of reinforced concrete structures. Dr. Brown received his PhD in structural engineering from the University of Florida in 2005.Chad Rohrbacher, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona
Paper ID #37161Student perspectives on engineering design, decision-making,adaptability, and support in capstone designMs. Shruti Misra, University of Washington I am a graduate student in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. My research interest is broadly focused on studying innovation in university-industry partnerships. I am interesting in various ways that universitiesDr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson is a professor of electrical engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. Her research interests in engineering education focus on the role of self
Paper ID #39701Examining an Equity-Focused Collective Impacted Project through the Lensof Alliance Members’ Prior ExperiencesRebecca Zarch, SageFox Consulting Group Rebecca Zarch is an evaluator and a director of SageFox Consulting Group. She has spent almost 20 years evaluating and researching STEM education projects from K-12 through graduate programs.Dr. Monica McGill, CSEdResearch.org Monica McGill is President & CEO of CSEdResearch.org. Her area of scholarship is K-12 computer science and cybersecurity education research with a current focus on diversity and improving the quality of research
beliefs about math, English, science, and social studies. Other research interests of hers include the formation of career aspirations, the school- to-work transition, and the differential participation in science, technology, engineering, and math fields based on social identity groups such as gender and Racial/Ethnic identity.Dr. Nathalie Duval-Couetil, Purdue University at West Lafayette Nathalie Duval-Couetil is the Director of the Certificate in Entrepreneurship and Innovation Program, Associate Director of the Burton D. Morgan Center, and a Professor in the Department of Technology Leadership and Innovation at Purdue University. She is ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023
0 4.3% 4.0% 10.2% 8.6% 2 or more 15.0% 0 6.0% 5.9% 6.1% Wh 75.0% 87.0% 60.0% 56.4% 59.6%1 F=Female; M=Male; As=Asian; B/AA=Black/African American; Hisp/Lat=Hispanic/Latino;Intr=International; 2 or more=2 or more races; Wh=White.In Fall 2019 (green bars, Figure 1), the Urban STEM PLTL section performed significantlybetter than any other section type, including the other learning community, with a DFW rate of0% – that is, every student in the PLTL section passed Calculus 1 with a grade of C- or higher.Students in other recitation sections (with or without learning community) fared better
Equity,” Harv. Educ. Rev., vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 206–232, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.17763/0017-8055.86.2.206.[5] B. M. K. Hagerty, J. Lynch-Sauer, K. L. Patusky, M. Bouwsema, and P. Collier, “Sense of belonging: A vital mental health concept,” Arch. Psychiatr. Nurs., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 172– 177, Jun. 1992, doi: 10.1016/0883-9417(92)90028-H.[6] M. E. Andrews, Borrego Maura, and Boklage Audrey, “Self-efficacy and belonging: the impact of a university makerspace,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1186/s40594-021-00285-0.[7] S. Hotchkiss, K. Talley, M. Londa, and A. Talley, “Do I Belong in a Makerspace?: Investigating Student Belonging and Non-verbal Cues in a University Makerspace,” in 2019 ASEE Annual
.[6] C. R. Østergaard, B. Timmermans and K. Kristinsson, "Does a different view create something new? The effect of employee diversity on innovation," Elsevier, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 500-509, 2010.[7] S. A. R. Vakil, "The racial politics of STEM education in the USA: interrogations and explorations," Race Ethnicity and Education, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 449-458, 2019.[8] L. L. Martins and F. J. Milliken, "Searching for Common Threads: Understanding the Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Groups," The Academy of Management, vol. 21, no. 2, p. 402433, 1996.[9] Engineering, National Academy of, Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering Education to the New Century, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press