inorganicmaterials as altering the band gap energy of these materials through chemical means is ratherchallenging. Therefore, significant effort has been placed in designing, synthesizing, andimplementing quantum dot semiconductors in photovoltaic applications. This has led to acombination of computational design investigations by physicists, advanced synthetic proceduresby chemists, and fabrication and testing of quantum dot solar cells by engineers. As such,significant progress has been made with respect to achieving relatively high power conversionefficiency values at the laboratory scale. However, the ability to scale the production of quantumdot semiconductors and the potential toxicity (e.g., adverse effects felt by the fabricationengineers and
student success inengineering by removing the first-year bottleneck associated with the traditional freshmancalculus sequence.The first-year engineering math course, Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applications,included lecture and collaborative laboratory and recitation components. The course addressesonly the math topics used in core engineering courses such as physics, engineering mechanics,electric circuits and computer programming sequences. Using an application-oriented, hands-onproblem-based learning approach, it replaced traditional math prerequisite requirements for theaforementioned core courses in order for students to advance in the curriculum without firstcompleting a traditional first-year calculus sequence. This structure
parallel with this project-based design course. In the theoreticalcourse, students learn the technical concepts about sensors, actuators and communicationprotocols using an embedded platform and C programming.Since students must make use of the laboratory facilities and fabrication tools (Appendix E), bythe time they have been enrolled in this course, they already have attended some lectures aboutlaboratory safety procedures and standards in previous courses.Course methodology and promoted skillsAs mentioned before, it is important for the students to be already familiarized with electroniccircuits, some tools and programming in such a way that allows them to have the lead in aproject of their own. For this course, sessions are a mix between
promote integration of robotics in middle school science and math education. For her doctoral research, she conducts mechatronics and robotics research in the Mechatronics, Controls, and Robotics Laboratory at NYU.Dr. Sheila Borges Rajguru, NYU Tandon School of Engineering Dr. Sheila Borges Rajguru is the Assistant Director of the Center for K-12 STEM Education, NYU Tan- don School of Engineering. As the Center’s STEAM educator and researcher she works with engineers and faculty to provide professional development to K-12 STEM teachers with a focus on social justice. She is currently Co-Principal Investigator on two NSF-grants that provide robotics/mechatronics PD to science, math, and technology teachers. In addition
learned. In an online environment that is asynchronous, learnersdo not have the constraints of time and place. By leveraging online technologies, studentlearning should be designed with transfer of same information to all learners. For the freshmanstudent, online learning is most suitable for factual type learning or less challenging learningactivities [12].F2F would be recommended for intensively challenging, high-benefit learning activities. Forexample, the hands-on laboratory experiments in EE110 solidify key concepts learned from themultimedia content: online videos, text readings, assigned homework and frequent onlinequizzes. Through peer collaboration, students can help each other work through the labs as wellas learning how to troubleshoot
of Technology (Mexico, 1996). Dr. Torres Garibay has taught several courses and laboratories at both Klamath Falls and Portland-Metro campuses, and served in various administrative positions, including department chair and program director.Jessica Kerby, Oregon Institute of Technology First year graduate student in the Renewable Energy Engineering program at the Oregon Institute of Technology. Previous Master of Science in Physics from the University of Cincinnati, Ohio.Mr. Andrew Powers Minigan, The Right Question Institute Andrew P. Minigan is the Right Question Institute’s (RQI) Director of Strategy. He facilitates active learn- ing experiences for educators, faculty, researchers, and students in both K-12 and
currently does research at the Dynamical Systems Laboratory of NYU-Poly in the area of robotic fish controlled by iPhone/iPad devices.Dr. Vikram Kapila, Polytechnic Institute of New York University Vikram Kapila is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at NYU-Poly, where he directs an NSF funded Web-Enabled Mechatronics and Process Control Remote Laboratory, an NSF funded Research Experience for Teachers Site in Mechatronics, and an NSF funded GK-12 Fellows project. He has held visiting posi- tions with the Air Force Research Laboratories in Dayton, OH. His research interests are in K-12 STEM education, mechatronics, robotics, and linear/nonlinear control for diverse engineering applications. Un- der Research Experience
NSFsponsored Industry University Cooperative Research Center: The Repair of Buildings and Bridges with Composites, the Constructed Facilities Laboratory, the Institute for Transportation Research and Education, the Center for Transportation and the Environment, the Center for Sustainable Use of Resources, and the DHS Center of Excellence – Natural Disasters, Coastal Infrastructure and Emergency Management. Last fiscal year, research expenditures in the department exceeded $14 million. Current BSCE Curriculum The department offers three accredited undergraduate degrees: 1) Civil Engineering, 2) Construction Engineering and Management, and 3) Environmental Engineering. The BSCE has been accredited by ABET since 1936
Science on their engineering exhibits and works to improve the facilitation and design of the exhibits. Her research focuses on how science center visitors engage and tinker at engineering activities and the impacts of these open-ended tinkering activities in terms of STEM learning and engineering understanding.Dr. Alice Merner Agogino, University of California, Berkeley Alice M. Agogino is the Roscoe and Elizabeth Hughes Professor of Mechanical Engineering and affli- ated faculty at the Haas School of Business in their Operations and Information Technology Management Group. She directs the Berkeley Expert Systems Technology /Berkeley Energy and Sustainable Technolo- gies (BEST) Laboratories and is a member of the
other devices have an embedded, commercially available OS allowing different models tohave the same base OS. If development tools exist, developers should find porting anapplication to a different device using the same OS far easier than to one using a completelydifferent OS. This paper examines issues for the development of an operating systems’courselaboratory assignment using a commercial OS. The embedded system platform that is targetedfor this laboratory assignment is a H/PC device using the Microsoft Windows CE operatingsystem. Commercial developer’s tools for these platforms and environments from Microsoftare used. The primary software result of this assignment is to develop parts of an application thatare used to create a time
Cincinnati, College of Engineering. This survey used the same formatand gathered results for 10 distinct disciplines in the undergraduate program. Canale & Duwartconducted parallel studies at Northeastern University. Results from both sets of studies areconsistent. They indicate that the students’ perceptions of the learning that occurred throughcooperative education has a direct and significant impact on their development in the elevenABET attributes. Within all engineering disciplines surveyed, and without special treatment,cooperative education shows itself to be a strong partner, along with traditional academiccoursework and laboratories, in the development of these attributes in the engineering graduate.The authors propose that colleges who
method of group lab report writing proposed in this study blends individualaccountability with group ownership and collaboration. The I-in-Team submission method seeks tocreate a balance of individual work and teamwork.Methodology The test group for this study included 35 students enrolled in the ABET accredited junior-level Unit Operations Laboratory chemical engineering class at a public state university] Thesestudents were divided into 11 lab groups. The class was held in-person three sessions a week witha mix of both online submissions using Canvas and in-class physical submissions for assignments. The summarized grade distributions for assignments from the course applicable to thisstudy are provided below in Table 1. The final
Orientation-Epistemological Openness, Reflective Value Awareness, Commitment to cognitive, engineering education: a mixed methods study Values Pluralism affective of an animal tissue harvesting laboratory [33] Being- Dignity, Worth of People, & Natural Environment Empathy, Persuasiveness and Knowledge Skill- Perspective Taking, Affective Sharing, Self & Other Awareness, Mode Switching promote innovative engineering and behavioral Orientation-Reflective Value Awareness entrepreneurial skills [34] Being- Holistic Service to
AC 2011-315: MODAL ENGAGEMENTS IN PRECOLLEGE ENGINEER-ING: TRACKING MATH AND SCIENCE CONCEPTS ACROSS SYMBOLS,SKETCHES, SOFTWARE, SILICONE AND WOODMitchell J. Nathan, University of Wisconsin-Madison Mitchell J. Nathan, BSEE, PhD, is professor of Educational Psychology, with affiliate appointments in Curriculum & Instruction and Psychology at the University of Wisconsin - Madison, and a faculty fel- low at the Wisconsin Center for Education Research (WCER) and the Center on Education and Work. Dr. Nathan studies the cognitive, embodied, and social processes involved in STEM reasoning, learn- ing and teaching, especially in mathematics and engineering classrooms and in laboratory settings, using both quantitative
electricity. See the appendix for the complete project. In designing this circuit,students had to utilize physics concepts within engineering constraints. Borrowing fromprinciples of problem-based and collaborative learning, in this semi-structured project, in groups,students were expected to make a self-assessment of what they already knew, what they neededto know, and where to go to find obtain information needed to solve the problem.There are multiple expected outcomes that students can use in their design of the semi-structuredproject, but they do not have to use any particular design element or any combination of designelements. Also, because the class is not held in a laboratory with specialized equipment,students’ design decisions are limited
issuepercolates to more advanced upper-level courses where numerical techniques are inherentlyrequired to adequately describe various physical phenomena or in laboratories where datacollection hardware interfacing is paramount. In an attempt to mitigate the difficulties of learning programming logic and thereforeincreasing content interest and ultimately course performance, MATLAB Grader was employedin two different instances of the course. The first was during the Winter 2021-22 term where thebulk of the homework consisted of MATLAB Grader problems (about four to six problems perweek), but other homework problems were also assigned requiring in-person check-ins (one ortwo per week). The MATLAB Grader problems were used to build the conceptual
. The focus group questionsenabled a more in-depth discussion of the topics described in the Technology Acceptance Model(TAM), i.e. perceived usefulness and ease-of-use of the game. The students played the game in aquiet computer laboratory with section partitions around each player to limit interaction ofparticipants while playing the game. Students wore noise cancelling headsets attached to theircomputers that allowed them to hear the sounds of the game. Some of the students played gameswhere the sound was turned off. The focus group was conducted in a conference room, which wasseparate from the computer room. Several additional questions were included along with the questionnaire questions during thefocus group discussion to facilitate the
Laboratory. The othermembers of the panel were scientists and engineers from various government agencies,universities and corporations.The report’s numerous recommendations addressed every aspect of technical information fromthe writing of abstracts to the development of information handling systems; use of citationindexes, the reduction of unnecessary and duplicative publications, and the creation of a nationalnetwork of technical information centers. One of its major recommendations was to improvestudent education in information retrieval and the use of literature. Noting that some disciplines,notably chemistry, did require students to take courses on using the literature, engineers “receivevirtually no training in literature techniques, and they
enrollment course. Research should expand Hartman’s experiences withmore scholarship to understand how these influence faculty assessment decisions, such as usingtests, which our findings will begin to address. Another form of course context is the type of courses that influence the faculty’s coursedecisions. In engineering curricula, courses are typically in the form of introductory courses,fundamental engineering courses, laboratory courses, and capstone courses (Lord & Chen, 2015;Sheppard et al., 2009). Stark (2000) has argued that instructors of introductory courses tend toshape their goals of the course based on nature of the disciplines, and subsequently their courseplanning. In engineering education, however, studies on the types
education.Dr. Samuel Garcia, The University of Texas, Rio Grande Valley Dr. Samuel Garc´ıa Jr. serves as an Educator Professional Development Specialist at Kennedy Space Center. Prior to his position at Kennedy Space Center, Dr. Garc´ıa worked at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, CA. As an education specialist, Dr. Garc´ıa is deeply committed to developing STEM educational mindsets, tools, and resources and facilitate educational experiences for educators and students. Prior to working as an education specialist, Dr. Garc´ıa served as secondary school educator in Rio Grande Valley in Texas for seven years. Dr. Garc´ıa, a first-generation college student, earned both his bachelor’s and master’s degrees from the
, ˜ Schleife is a Blue Waters Assistant Professor in the Department of Materials Science and En- AndrA© gineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He obtained his Diploma and Ph.D. at Friedrich-Schiller-University in Jena, Germany for his theoDr. Cecilia Leal ˜ Leal is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering and the CecAlia Frederick Seitz Materials Research Laboratory at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign since 2012. She graduated in Industrial Chemistry from CoiProf. Dallas R. Trinkle, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Dallas R. Trinkle is an associate professor in Materials Science and Engineering at Univ. Illinois, Urbana- Champaign
mentoring, and coaching to increase the self-confidence and belongingness of first-generation college students in biomedical engineering,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 143(12), 2021.[5] G. Davis and C. Hoff, (2008, June), “Promoting Professional Development In Undergraduate Engineering Using Laboratory Team Projects: A Case Study” in 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, June, 2008, American Society for Engineering Education.[6] J.J. Mischung, J. Smithwick, K. T. Sullivan, and A. Perrenoud, “Using Skills-Based Emotional Intelligence Training to Improve Team Performance in Construction Management Programs” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington, USA, June
across the Grainger College of Engineering.Dr. Saadeddine Shehab, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Saadeddine Shehab is currently the Associate Director of Assessment and Research at the Siebel Center for Design (SCD) at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He works with a group of under- graduate and graduate SCD scholars at SCD’s Assessment and Research Laboratory to conduct research that informs and evaluates the practice of teaching and learning human-centered design in formal and in- formal learning environments. His research focuses on studying students’ collaborative problem-solving processes and the role of the teacher in facilitating these processes in STEM classrooms that feature the
-founded his company in 2003 and started manufacturing automatedheavy mechanical equipment such as road blockers, boom barriers, bollards, turnstiles, and firedoors in 2009. He emphasized the importance of standards for reliability and efficiency of themechanical products, and their compatibility with other systems. In his experience, exportquality of industrial products is achieved by following international engineering standards,which greatly increases the market value of such products. Apart from mentioning UL(Underwriters Laboratories) standards and other manufacturing standards for mechanicalequipment, electronics and fire doors, the participant also considered the workplace safetystandards critical for the physical well - being of on-site
students would be exposed to.” “I suspect that it really is then individualized depending on which laboratory an undergrad student might be working in. For that matter, a graduate student as well.” “I think the ones that I can think of explicitly would be the ethical guidelines that we agreed to become members of societies. For example, the ecological society has ethical guidelines. And being a member means I subscribe to those” “I presume then that they also become exposed to other ethical frameworks related to publications, etc.” “Other than I would say obvious ones—that are related to sacrificing animals, you know there's a whole protocol for that—that requires lots of
: http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.07355[29] N. Shah, H. Lamba, A. Beutel, and C. Faloutsos, “The many faces of link fraud,” in 2017 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), New Orleans, LA, Nov. 2017. doi: 10.1109/icdm.2017.140.[30] V. S. Subrahmanian et al., “The DARPA Twitter Bot Challenge,” arXiv [cs.SI], Jan. 20, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1601.05140[31] L.-M. Yan, S. Kang, and S. Hu, Unusual Features of the SARS-CoV-2 Genome Suggesting Sophisticated Laboratory Modification Rather Than Natural Evolution and Delineation of Its Probable Synthetic Route. 2020. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4028830.[32] J. Donovan and J. Nilsen, “Cloaked Science: The Yan Reports,” Jan. 03, 2021. https
. Second,engineering researchers can narrowly isolate experimental variables and follow uniform andwidely-accepted laboratory testing standards. The results from engineering research are well-defined and replicable, and proposed models can be validated. Unlike engineering research,EER typically includes a broad range of uncontrollable confounding variables and a lack ofspecificity and guidance in the selection of appropriate theoretical frameworks and analyticalmethods [5,6].Since engineering faculty are often the initiators of EER studies, it is logical that faculty whoalready teach engineering courses and conduct engineering research may be inclined to pursueEER opportunities. Their motivation may be to either complement their ongoing
Paper ID #36921A Qualitative Methods Primer: A Resource to Assist Engineering EducationScholars in Mentoring Traditionally Trained Engineering Faculty toEducational ResearchDr. Matthew Bahnson, Pennsylvania State University Matthew Bahnson a postdoctoral research scholar in engineering education with the Engineering Cogni- tive Research Laboratory with Dr. Catherin Berdanier at Pennsylvania State University. He completed his Ph.D. in the Applied Social and Community Psychology program in at North Carolina State University. His previous training includes a B.A. in Psychology from the University of Northern Iowa and an M.A. in
within chemically modified, biomimetic hydrogels and was awarded the Distinguished Master’s Thesis Award by the university’s graduate office for her work. After graduating, she continued her research in a tissue engineering/ biomaterials laboratory until accepting a teaching position at Marian University where she currently teaches Physics I, Physics II, Biophysics, and will soon be developing courses related to biomaterials. In addition to teaching, Tanja also plays a large role in the community outreach of the E.S. WSOE through directing events such as the Central Indi- ana Regional Science and Engineering Fair and the annual INnovation Through Engineering Residential Summer Camp. Through her efforts, Ms. Greene