engineering program needed to fitinto that liberal arts model. That meant cultivating the core aspects of the liberal arts model,especially a whole-person approach to collegiate development, a reflective framework forstudents to grow as learners and people, and the ability and desire to be a lifelong learner.Engineering is traditionally a professional degree, thus there was initial wariness about the abilityfor the new program to integrate into the greater college. The pilot engineering science degreeprimarily drew on existing classes and was a subset of the physics department. The revised BAand new BS require more new classes and provide a professional degree. This evolution causedconcern among other faculty members who had concerns that the degrees
theauthors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] B. Wang, C. Wu, L. Kang, G. Reniers, and L. Huang, "Work safety in China’s thirteenthfive-year plan period (2016–2020): status, new challenges, and future tasks," Saf. Sci., vol. 104,no. 4, pp. 164-178, 2018[2] "Chapter 5: Indicators for Monitoring Undergraduate STEM Education," National ResearchCouncil. [Online]. Available: https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/6369/chapter/5.[3] International Energy Agency, "Energy Efficiency 2020: Industry," 2020. [Online]. Available:https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-efficiency-2020/industry.[4] Occupational Safety and Health Administration, "Personal Protective Equipment," OSHA,[Online]. Available: https
, Available: https://eduq.info/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11515/37397/stommel-how-to-ungrade- 2018.pdf?sequence=2.[31] A. Kohn, (2012). The Case Against Grades, The Education Digest; Ann Arbor, vol. 77, no. 5, Prakken Publications, Inc., Ann Arbor, United States, Ann Arbor, pp. 8–16.[32] Dosmar, E., and Williams, J.M. (2022). Student reflections on learning as the basis for course grades. ASEE Annual Meetings, Minneapolis, MN June 2022.[33] Casem, M. L. (2006). Active learning is not enough. Journal of College Science Teaching, 35(6), 52.[34] Ko, M.E. (2021). Revolutionizing grading: implications on power, agency, and equity. ASEE Annual Meetings, 2021. Paper ID 33692.[35] Deardorff, A. S., Moore, J. A., McCormick, C., Koles, P. G
theirwork.Pedagogical approaches for teaching sustainability in civil engineeringSustainability concepts can be incorporated into civil engineering education through curriculumchanges to the course content, involving students in research on sustainability-related topics,collaborating with industry partners to allow students gain exposure and work on real-worldprojects, and pedagogical approaches such as project-based learning, problem-based learning,and case studies. Gutierrez-Bucheli et al. (2022) suggested teaching sustainability using project-based approaches that reflect the culture and context of the students to enable them to frame theirunderstanding of sustainability. Vemury et al. (2018) also found that problem and project-basedapproaches using real
legitimacy among their colleagues and influence the twistedperceptions before arriving at the STEM threshold.Women of Color Faculty As women of Color emerge inspirit through the academic doorway and nestle into facultypositions, it is important to understand the journey. Some challenges women of Color facultyundergo ominously reflect on their days as students. Previous studies outline issues ofinsufficient cultural representation in the curriculum [7], stereotyping, isolation, faltering DEI(diversity, equity, and inclusion) policies and practices, tokenism, and false impressions ofacademic achievement [7]. The splendor of academic potential expeditiously dissipates as theimpenetrable fog of inequity surrounds and persists, overshadowing their
theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure.” Psychological bulletin, vol. 133, no. 1, p. 65, 2007.[28] P. Steel, T. Brothen, and C. Wambach, “Procrastination and personality, performance, and mood,” Personality and individual differences, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 95–106, 2001.[29] A. Rotenstein, H. Z. Davis, and L. Tatum, “Early birds versus just-in-timers: the effect of procrastination on academic performance of accounting students,” Journal of Accounting Education, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 223–232, 2009.[30] C. Ott, B. McCane, and N. Meek, “Mastery learning in cs1-an invitation to procrastinate?: Reflecting on six years of mastery learning,” in Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in
do engineering, self-confidence in their own ability tosuccessfully pursue an engineering degree, and how many declare and persist in an engineeringmajor. Full development of assessment methods, both qualitative and quantitative, is currentlyunderway.DisclaimerThe views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect theofficial policy or position of the United States Air Force Academy, the Air Force, theDepartment of Defense, or the U.S. Government.References[1] Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, “Diversity, Equity & Inclusion.” https://www.abet.org/about-abet/diversity-equity-and-inclusion/ (accessed Apr. 1, 2023).[2] National Science and Technology Council, “Charting a
students’ response to a survey question asking how close they came tomatching the published drag coefficient. As is apparent from the chart, only a few got close tothe published value. This was an expected result. It was also the principle intention of theassignment. This question was asked not only to measure how close the students got, but also tohave them reflect on their work and the nature of simulation as a better qualitative thanquantitative tool. Figure 8: Student responses to “Within what percentage were you able to get the CFD drag coefficient to the published value?”Student FeedbackStudents were required to answer a short survey as part of their project deliverables. Thestudents were aware the survey was not
using principal axis factoring as ourextraction method to account for a non-normal distribution of data [28], as is expected withsurvey data. We chose an oblique rotation method (promax), as this is appropriate in educationaland social science surveys in which some correlation between factors is both anticipated anduseful [29, 30]. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) [31] measure of sampling adequacy was 0.78,which met the recommendation of ≥ .70 [32] and Bartlett's test of sphericity was significant, p .40 or < -.40); this loading indicates which questions group together as a latentfactor. These factors are retained if they have a Cronbach’s alpha ≥ .70; the factors can then benamed by researchers to reflect the latent construct measured. The
to reflect on the class andprovide feedback. It is used as a participation activity. This survey starts as follows: “Your insights into your learning in this course can help me see our course from your side of the desk. Please respond to any three of the statements below (more if you’d like). I will use them as I plan for my courses next semester.” Then students are given the option to choose to answer three out of the six listed questions.Given this option, most students tend to answer in more detail when elaborating their answers. Asummary of student feedback in the end of spring 2022 on these questions are given below: Question 1: “This course most helped my learning of the content when … because …” 77.3
should take (e.g., over email, in person, online chat,etc.), what additional training may be helpful for the faculty and peer mentors to be effectivementors to this population of students, and generally what aspects of the mentoring experience ismost impactful for the students. We plan to use these results to improve the existing scholarshipprogram and to share effective strategies with the engineering community on how to motivateand support engineering transfer students.AcknowledgmentThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant #1742627. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the
work, which was the construction of the curriculum map, itcan be observed that the discussion between coordinators throughout the formative process and theway in which coordinators had space to analyze the programs they coordinate allowed for the mapsnot to be discrepantin terms of the areas to be assessed. Although there is no definition in theliterature about how many areas should be assessed, it can be observed in this process that mapswere created that reveal the coordinators' appropriation of thecore points of the curriculum and thespecific competences of each area.Furthermore, it also allowed the closest programs to also havemaps that reflect this proximity. It is thus observed the importance, for the implementation of a learning
presentation anddistilled into a poster presentation. These presentations allow for reflection on how the projecthas developed over the course of the semester, reiterating the importance of holisticconsideration in design decision-making. Students have the opportunity to present theirsemester’s work and improve their communication skills through an open poster session for thedepartment, and received feedback from faculty, undergraduate and graduate students external tothe course.Student Feedback and Course OutcomesThis restructured Sustainable Materials Design course has been delivered for two years, withimprovements in course content, structure, and assignments towards SDG-centered projectsbased on student feedback. Additionally, students were given
participants to confirm that ourinterpretations of the data were consistent with their lived experiences and perceptions. Our aimwas to enhance the credibility and trustworthiness of the research findings by ensuring that theyaccurately reflect the participants’ perspectives. Five of the seven participants responded to ourrequest and informed us that the experiences and perceptions we reported were accuratelycaptured and documented. Two participants did not respond to us.ParticipantsThe study participants were seven international graduate students majoring in Sciences andEngineering. All seven participants were older than 18 years of age. They were pursuinggraduate studies at public research universities in the US at the time of data collection. Six
-tests to measureoverall learning levels was not feasible. Furthermore, these would necessarily have to beconducted via an online form, which, in turn, would cast doubt on the reliability of the results asit would not be possible to guarantee that student answers fully reflect their accurate knowledgelevels.AcknowledgmentsThe authors want to acknowledge the leadership and financial support of the School ofEngineering of Universidad Andres Bello, Chile. We also thank the Educational and AcademicInnovation Unit (UNIDA) for mentoring and guidance in developing scientific articles in highereducation research.In addition, the authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of Writing Lab, Institutefor the Future of Education, Tecnologico de
refer to the culminative findings for all students on a givenassessment as it relates to the course learning outcome(s) which are a critical tool in evaluatinghow well the necessary material within a course is being delivered to and received by thestudents. Both student and course level assessments should be considered when evaluating theimpact of changes made within a course. These types of assessments will be the focus of thispaper as a means to measuring students’ ability to consciously assess their competence in realtime during exams. Instructor level assessments refer to those performed by students at the endof the semester. While these are vital to course improvement they do not always reflect studentunderstanding and for that reason are
analytics to understand the learning pathways of novice programmers,” Journal of the Learning Sciences vol. 22, no. 4, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.836655. (Accessed Feb. 12, 2022).[17] Ozobot. “OzoBlockly.” Ozobot.com. https://ozobot.com/create/ozoblockly. (Accessed Feb. 12, 2022).AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant #1741910. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.
wellfor future classes leading to the award of a degree. Different course instructors have differentstyles of teaching and are reflected on what students learn and understand after taking aparticular course. It is up to the individual instructor to determine who passed and who failed acourse based on some general guidelines provided in the course outline. A few of the publishedliterature [4-12] have extensively documented the difficulty students face in thermodynamicsclasses. One would assume that as the science of energy, and since energy is used in everydayactivities, students of thermodynamics would embrace the subject matter and do well in a classon the subject matter. Among the recommendations [10] for improving the situation are the useof
Kaczala, , Eccles, 2005). Stage 1 associates the codes discovered in stage 0with the four subjective task value (STV) categories outlined by Eccles: (a) accomplishment, (b)intrinsic, (c) utility, and (d) relative cost. The definition of Attainment is how an individual'sview of a task reflects their sense of self. Intrinsic value, also known as interest value, is theenjoyment individuals have while performing a task. Utility value is described as a student'sview of the future involvement of a particular task, and relative cost is the cost associated withengaging in a particular task, as measured by time, effort, or psychological aspects. Table 1: Coding scheme at stage-0 TotalCategory Code
. Inaddition, due to the nature of rocket combustion, sampling rates must be upwards of 1000 Hznear the combustion chamber to reduce the effects of aliasing (2). For measuring the pressures on the combustion chamber as well as the tanks, straingauges were examined as a possible choice. Strain gauges provide an effective way to measurepressure using hoop stress (3). It should be noted that this measurement is a derivedmeasurement, however the benefits of a strain gauge’s non-intrusiveness far make up for anydownsides at this stage of development at RPL.Data Acquisition System Design Goals The main goal of the DAQ is to be quickly set up and applied to many different prototypedesigns. The selection of sensors reflects this as the only
curriculum includes 10 modules including the following topics: 1) surfacesand solids of revolution; 2) combining solid objects; 3) isometric drawings and coded plans; 4)orthographic drawings; 5) orthographic projections of inclined and curved surfaces; 6) flatpatterns; 7) rotation of objects about a single axis; 8) rotation of objects about two or more axes;9) object reflections and symmetry; and 10) cutting planes and cross sections. Longitudinalstudies have shown the efficacy of the curriculum [10], [11], [12]. While the National Science Board’s Vision 2030 suggests that increasing “STEM skills andopportunities for all Americans” [16] is essential for addressing the labor gap for technicalworkers in STEM fields, one group noticeably missing
gateway course and reportedstudents’ experience. Students who have completed the prep course have a lower DFW rate(5.6%) in the gateway course compared to recent rates of all students in the gateway course(34.1%) and report high levels of satisfaction (4.8 out of 5) with the course and experience.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation, specifically theS-STEM program of the Division of Undergraduate Education (DUE), under Grant No. 1642508.Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] T.J. Freeborn, S. Burkett, D. McCallum, E. Steele, S
forms.Since the Mid-Outcomes survey was administered right after the VBL module, it is not a surprisethat experimental, computing, and communication (graphical) outcomes rose noticeably from thePre-Outcome experiences. Also, the last four outcomes (7, 8, 9, 10) seem to decrease linearly ingoing from the Pre- to Mid- to Post-Outcomes surveys. These latter outcomes (teamwork, life-long learning, professional issues, and societal issues) are softer engineering skills that were notaddressed in the course, and the student’s reflected this fact with their rankings. Outcomes Survey 5.00 4.50 4.00 3.50
tunnel are the only lights used. The position of the lights minimizes themaximum amount of reflection of the lights on the exterior of the wind tunnel, allowingthe camera setup to capture the true color in the images under the same conditions forboth calibration and experimentation.A Variac controller and fan are set at a speed to pull air through the test section while anupstream mesh heater provides as a constant heat source. As air flows through the testsection, the arc welder heats a stainless steel mesh which evenly distributes energy intothe air. As the surface heats, the liquid crystal changes color. Once the plate reaches41°C (as measured by the surface thermocouple), the upper limit for the particular crystalused, the heater and fan are
bracket is thin relative to its otherdimensions. In the case of the beam, the thickness was on the same order as the otherbeam dimensions. Conveying this type of modeling sensitivity to a student using FEA isa challenge.Discussion The following points reflect this mechanical design teacher’s experience withsomeone who does calculations and FEA studies without due consideration of thereasonableness of the estimated stress response. 1) A person should always interpret the results of calculations or simulations forreasonableness. It is not unusual to find engineering students substitute numbers intoequations without questioning the reasonableness of the “solution”. One commoncharacteristic of this situation is inconsistency in the units of
1students initial design abilities, better strategies can be developed to provide scaffolding asappropriate design skills are taught throughout the program.Background Engineering design is an important aspect of any engineering or engineering technologyprogram. Design is what engineers do, and hence the training should reflect this. Traditionally,design experiences have been relegated to senior year capstone experiences. Recently however,an increase in the number of design experiences in the freshman year, sometimes referred to ascornerstone design experiences, are being introduced into curricula. These design-focusedcourses have taken the form of project-based courses where the structure of the course focusesaround the design of a single or
much enjoyed the guest lectures; it was one of the few times that I learned about how the course material was actually being used in industry. Also, I think the flipped classroom worked well for this course as with programming, questions tend to arise when you are working on an activity rather than learning the syntax. • The guest lectures and seeing industry applications of Python in chemical engineering are very enjoyable. I was doubtful about the structure where videos were posted for watching outside of class and activities were given during class time, but upon reflection I think it was probably the best way to learn the material. • Flipped classroom and in class assignments that we can ask for help
the on-line approach, both asynchronous and synchronous deliveryoptions were available to accommodate the range of activities undertaken, including readings,teacher contributions to discussion, and completion of assignments by teachers. Discussionforums allowed teachers to share content, ideas, instructional strategies, and alternativeperspectives. As part of the project, teachers implemented and maintained electronic portfolios,that included lesson plans and samples of student work, especially those for “observed classes”either by videotape, through the web, or live. Teachers were also asked to reflect upon theirimplementation of the lesson plans, describing successes and problem areas that occurred duringthe implementation. At an
projects funded by the SBIR program reflect societal significance of the missions of theaforementioned participating agencies. Every year, each participating federal agency compiles,ranks, down selects, and publishes a list of desired STEM-based innovations that are alignedwith its societally significant mission but which are not commercially available. Each agencyalso publishes instructions on how to apply for SBIR funding, how applications are evaluated,abstracts of previous awards (the proposals themselves are confidential), and award statistics.The number of solicited innovations, called “topics” in SBIR parlance, has increased from 842 in2011 to over two thousand in 2018 (United States Small Business Administration, 2021). Eachtopic includes
of the phenomenon understudy, and to transfer the findings beyond the bounds of the study to individuals in similar situations(Moustakas, 1994).The research was guided by the following two central research questions: (1) What are the ways inwhich engineering faculty conceptualize STEM identity?(2) How do engineering faculty promote theSTEM identity of undergraduate women in the classroom?Collins’ BSSI Model (2018) was used as the conceptual framework for this study. Four componentscomprise Collins’ BSSI model: reflective identity, competence/ability, values/interest, andassimilation The model assumes an asset-based approach to STEM talent development for studentsand suggests that identity is intersectional, dynamic, developmental, and