from engineering; it also attracted others from across campusencompassing such diverse disciplines as education, library science, chemistry, biology, andatmospheric science. The group’s intended purpose was to lower the activation barrier to helpinterested faculty try flipping, by sharing group knowledge and experiences. Accordingly, thelearning community was planned as a “working” community where members would learn fromeach other as they redesigned and flipped their respective course(s) and created online material.The specific goals of this learning community were to: 1) Explore pedagogy of a flippedclassroom. What do students do within and outside of a flipped class? 2) Explore technologiesavailable to support flipping a course. 3) Flip
Theassertion that many researchers make is that it is the responsibility of the entire university toassure quality student writing skills. 1,3,4Institutions that have a formalized program have grown over the last 20 years. 5 This growth hasnot been without challenges. To have a successful program institutional buy-in is critical, if it’snot supported from the top of the organization it is likely to fail. 8 Other factors that impact thesuccess of this type of program include: Possible resistance from the institution’s English department, with concerns that English competency may be developed outside of the traditional Freshman English course. 9 The belief that writing skills are developed prior to attending college. 10 Increased
health, with a particular focus on pediatric hip disorders and MRI-based methods.Dr. Juan Abell´o P.Eng., University of British Columbia, Vancouver Juan Abell´o, Ph.D., P.Eng, is an Instructor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and the Vantage One program at the University of British Columbia. His teaching interests include the integration of engineering science and design with language instruction. His technical research is in rotorcraft blade- vortex interaction (BVI) noise reduction. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Creating problem taxonomies for WeBWorK in mechanical engineeringWeBWorK is an open-source, online homework system widely used in mathematics at the
instructorused power point to present the course information. Most of the course management and classcommunication was done through blackboard, where the syllabus, assignments and lecturepresentations were all posted.According to the instructor’s syllabus for this particular ECE100 section, the course was Page 13.1289.7designed to emphasize the process of problem-solving, to prepare students to meet the generalpresentation requirements associated with technical work and to introduce them to the process ofcreating purposeful models. These skills and experiences will help them succeed with thediscipline-specific problems to come later. The course
follows then, that for students to havesustainable engineering literacy they must have knowledge about the subject, show concern forthe natural environment, and show behavior consistent with this knowledge and concern, forexample by developing technology with the ecological footprint in mind. Several studies onenvironmental behavior have found links between knowledge, attitudes, and behavior orbehavioral intentions, suggesting that as knowledge about an issue increases, so will subsequentattitudes or behaviors15.Previous studies have examined how knowledge about the environment affects environmentalattitudes or behaviors: An undergraduate course in environmental science can increase students’sense of concern for the environment and their
here: Proceedings of the 2020 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference University of New Mexico, Albuquerque Copyright 2020, c American Society for Engineering Education 3 4https://classnotes.ecs.baylor.edu/wiki/CSI 2334 Fry Spring 2019, (username: CSI2334S19, pass-word: FryMansiKuldaASEE2020). This includes the CSI 2334 Course syllabus, the CSI 2334Course calendar, and the CSI 2334 Spring 2019 Project (among other items).3 Students’ approach to the problem The students’ approach to the problem had three phases. The first entailed a preliminary ex-ploration of the
Leadership Program (GEL) is to “create an elite cadre ofengineering leaders with exceptional abilities to lead engineering teams by providing purpose,direction and motivation to influence others to achieve collective goals.”In prior papersi an overview of the complete structure of GEL has been described, including theassessment of industry’s need for improvement in engineering leadership and the current impactand consequences of poorly led engineering projects. A representative syllabus and approach tothe engineering, product development, technical and scientific content was also presented.Further, the global risk to the competitiveness of companies if this need is not addressed waspresented in 2012ii.The following sections describe themes that the
any ladders.Analytical Commentary on Insights for FacultySophie begins her narrative by highlighting both race and gender as most salient, but articulates gender asmore salient to her experience in engineering. Much of Sophie’s experience could be understood ashighlighting gendered microaggressions or other gendered cultural norms, such as mansplaining orstereotyping women as incapable. These might be seen as small, isolated incidents (i.e., the definition ofmicroaggression) but they are memorable, build up over time to have a collective impact, and affect herparticipation on her team and in the course. She has her own names for these phenomena, for example,“explaining things I never asked for” is a succinct description of mansplaining. After
engineering a residentialenvironment as well as intentional peer and faculty interaction to promote their success in thefield of engineering, has exceeded expectations in retaining undergraduate women from the firstto third year in engineering. Aspects of this community include students residing together on afloor of the co-educational hall dedicated to first-year students in engineering, access to aDouglass Peer Academic Leader (PAL) in-residence, support from a female engineering graduatestudent mentor, enrollment in the Douglass first-year course Knowledge and Power: Issues inWomen’s Leadership, and interaction with faculty from all engineering disciplines during theirlinked course Introduction to Engineering which is taught by a full-time faculty
, TX, USA Author Note:This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundationunder Grant No 1902072.Authors are listed in the order of their contribution to the manuscript.Correspondence regarding this manuscript should be sent to Magdalena G.Grohman at magdalena.grohman@unt.edu.AbstractMultiple studies report the benefits of authentic research experiences in STEMeducation. While most of them focus either on course-based research projects oron undergraduate students’ experiences, few document authentic learningexperiences unfolding in real time among and between graduate students inresearch laboratories. Therefore, we situate our study in the context of authenticresearch experiences in
), engineering education (through MasseyUniversity, New Zealand) and humanitarian engineering (through Coventry University, UK).Through its international platform, the purpose is to examine key areas where engineeringcan be harnessed to improve humanitarian and development outcomes. These areas are to:develop resource materials that are appropriate, culturally-relevant, that promote effectivepractice; deliver an international postgraduate course specifically in the area of humanitarianengineering; develop outreach programmes at all levels that encompasses pre-school throughto industrial professional development.This paper describes the initial process of the UNESCO UNITWIN’s formation followed bya description of how two of the collaborators have
believed these experiences helpedthem become well-rounded individuals. Their experiences have contributed to the developmentof skills that will be beneficial in the work world. For example, both students credited theirexperiences to improving their interpersonal skills with diverse groups, and Isabel explicitlyexpressed that meticulous time management is crucial for her to manage her course work andout-of-class activities.Curricular ContextTheme 3 - Deep learning experiences increase student engagement: When the participantswere asked to recall when they considered engineering fun, the participants provided examplesthat were tied to deep learning experiences. For this study, deep learning experiences are definedas experiences of instructional
artifacts they develop, we compared the correlation between the scores on thesesubscales of the IRI and the external evaluation of empathy rubric (EEER), a tool for determiningcomponents of empathy as described by Zaki’s framework [31].3 The Art of Telling Your Story“The Art of Telling Your Story” is a course for 3rd /4th year students in BME. The course itselfentails weekly assignments posted on Canvas, in-class sharing of stories, and student participationin the community as responses to Canvas posts and stories presented. A summary of the course,taken from the syllabus, is as follows: Why are stories and narratives important for engineers? Because great engineers are great storytellers. They capture and tell the stories of the people
willing, and even eager, to do so.The first week of the semester was spent reviewing the syllabus and the course requirements,especially the extracurricular expectations of the SLP, and introducing the SLA and CK partnersthey would be working with. The SLA GA reviewed the intention of SL and how they are thereto assist with the project. The CK rep described the school, the kiddos, and the purpose of theafter-school program. On the first day of the second week, students were expected to have readthat week’s chapter in order to be able to engage in the ensuing conversation about theinterpersonal skill topic of the week. Groups had already been self-selected, and the first groupwas expected to already be meeting to prepare their presentation.Each
iterations), ● both a descriptive and a reflective orientation (we sought to describe events and to document how the events were experienced), and ● an evolutionary perspective (in which we recognized that designs represent starting conditions that evolve over time in ways that are important to trace).The focus of the work is on the efforts of three educators who integrated micro-reflectionactivities into their weekly teaching responsibilities (specifically the teaching of studio sessions).The three educators varied in their preparation for their teaching responsibilities in the course.One of the three educators was experienced in that she had taught in the course for over a yearand had contributed to the redesigning several elements of
his work in Michigan, Taylor completed his Baccalaureate at the University of California, Irvine. As a teaching post-doctoral fellow, Taylor is heavily involved in education-based re- search efforts in the chemistry department while also serving as an instructor for the Introductory Organic Chemistry course. Page 26.1092.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Leveraging Reflection to Deepen Engineering Graduate Student Instructor Professional Development1. IntroductionPreparing graduate student instructors (GSI) to teach engineering students
this perspective comes from social studyresearch that working with real-world and narrative problems might help these students toembrace better their identity as engineers.To facilitate such collaboration, we (three faculty members from engineering and socialsciences) will teach concurrent courses for students in our disciplines, and bring our studentstogether during the semester to interact and collaborate. Each team of 4 students will beassigned a case study to discuss, collect data on, and analyze by conducting what-if analysis.Since our engineering course will be an elective course, it may attract predominantly URM andwomen students because of this case-study focus. Our desire to incorporate state-of-the-art toolsmay also facilitate the
project was an even mix between process and product, observing the students surprise at the amount of process needed to successfully launch a commercial product. The nature of the project was very interdisciplinary crossing between, software, firmware and hardware. • Credit hours and accreditation requirement: The course was two semesters for 8 credit hours. Several learning outcomes and educational objectives were documented in the course syllabus and assessment data was collected and monitored. • Outcome evaluation: Overall this was considered a “good” outcome in that the company is now selling commercial products. Reflecting on the project there was an obvious disconnect between the industry
, results, and conclusion) are highlighted to provide students with a framework fortheir final reports. Guidelines for the research paper (Appendix C) and examples of past researchreports (from the previous FIRE course) are made available to the students for reference.Additionally, a list of online resources offering tips for creating attractive and effective researchposters and academic writing guides are distributed to further aid in preparing the finaldeliverables. The research poster session is held during the last lecture session. Teams present theirsemester’s work in a 7 minute presentation, followed by 3 minutes of Q&A with the audience.Team research reports are also collected at this last meeting. In 2015, the poster session was
be permanently archived online. Authors are strongly encouraged butare not required to utilize such supporting material as animation, audio, graphics and video inaddition to text in order to best demonstrate their educational achievements. The journal includesdescriptions of innovative curricula, courses, and teaching practices both within and outside theclassroom that are clearly built upon a foundation of accepted learning science principles.Completed and documented studies are published as full articles; work in progress that showsdistinct promise of eventual success may be published as educational briefs. By focusing oneducational developments and practice, Advances in Engineering Education complements theJournal of Engineering Education
modeled by working in four sub-teams. Themeeting occurs at the semester’s mid-point, and it is three hours in length, which is set aside andscheduled in the course syllabus for lab activities. For this study, we analyzed a portion of thetranscript on the first segment of the meeting, in which team members gave presentations on eachconcept and held a question-and-answer session.A. Duration of Product PresentationsIn our examination of the audio recording and transcript of the decision meetings, we counted thetime duration of the product presentations for both Team A (Figure 4) and Team B (Figure 5). 12 10 8.00
in engineering education [65]. Noting that social justice is oftenabsent from engineering classes and curricula, Leydens and Lucena lay out a methodologies forintegrating social justice into engineering education [74]. They identify 4 spaces forimplementing change: 1) the Problem Space, which includes contextualized homeworkproblems; 2) the Course Space, which includes the course syllabus; 3) the Boundary Space,which includes programs and events that happen outside of class; and 4) the Program Space,which includes programmatic and/or curricular initiatives [74].The class that is the focus of this paper operates primarily in the Problem and Course Spaces.However, there have been some Boundary Space events, including some department activities
humanitarian thought and action 3. To learn the basic history of humanitarianismIt then provides reading assignments and a brief objective personal assessment quiz. Althoughpresently only in hardcopy format, the team member in charge of this module wants to make itavailable in a web-based format. Faculty can add it to a course syllabus, either as a requiredcomponent or as a supplement. Then it could easily become a course assignment where studentscan imagine ways in which their technical learning could be adapted or put to humanitarian use.Rather than teaching ethics as a professional code that places boundary conditions onprofessional practice, this module would attempt to stimulate idealism among students andencourage the expansion of
the reports, saying that they containedproprietary information. At the time, faculty decided to share the rubric used to evaluate studentpapers with mill supervisors so that they would have a standard by which they could rate papers,as well as an evaluation form to provide feedback on student work in the mill.In 2010, we developed a new approach to assessing these internships. Taking advantage of thecapabilities of the online course management system Desire2Learn®, students now respond to 16questions about their internship work while they are in the mills. These responses help studentsto remember activities performed during the entire internship. When they return to campus,students provide two pieces of work to satisfy academic requirements
ATLAS. This instrumentwas used in the present study to assess preferred learning strategies. An important advantage ofATLAS is that it is simple to administer and is currently the generally-accepted method formeasuring learning strategy preferences.18 Three distinct learning strategy groups wereidentified: Navigators, Problem Solvers, and Engagers.26 Navigators plan their learning andfocus on completing the necessary activities to achieve their goals. Order and structure areimportant to these learners, who tend to be logical, objective, and perfectionists. They want clearobjectives and expectations at the beginning of a course and in advance of activities, such as inan explicit and detailed syllabus and precisely defined assignments and
. Female students link engineering to problem solving,analytical thinking, innovative, creative thinking, decision making, and teamwork. Notsurprisingly, the top reason listed (75% of respondents) for their friends not choosing engineeringas their field of study was their lack of confidence in their abilities, especially in courses requiringadvanced knowledge of mathematics. Past research shows that for female students, the key driversof subject choice are how good they are at the subject (94%), the subject syllabus (92%) andwhether the subject teacher is knowledgeable (91%) while 87% believe whether the subject teacheris fun is also important. Some respondents mentioned that the female students were intimidated by the sheernumber of men
designsituations. With the conversation as a backdrop, students were then introduced to the notion of adesign rationale and asked to draft a sample design rationale as a way to introduce them to thisconcept.Case 2: Graduate multi-week projectThe journal landscape project was a multi-week project in a graduate level course entitledEmpirical Traditions in Human Centered Design and Engineering. Per the syllabus, the task was Page 22.1116.3as follows: “Working in teams of two or three, you and your teammate(s) will characterize oneyear of articles in a major journal in our field in terms of five to seven dimensions of yourchoosing and then prepare a summary of
Master of Arts Degree in Education and Human Development specializing in Educational Technology Leadership. Her work focuses on projects that measure and assess student perceptions of learning related to their experiences with engineering course innovations. She is a faculty development consultant with previous experience in instructional design and instructor of the Graduate Assistant Seminar for engineering teaching assistants.Sarah E Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Sarah Zappe is Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at Penn State. She holds a masters and a doctorate in educational psychology, where she
individual and team-level patterns that would help us address the following researchquestion: How can critique as a pedagogical strategy promote metacognition of learning andtransdisciplinarity?Setting. This study was performed at a mid-Atlantic research university in an interdisciplinaryproject-based course that encourages creative thinking and productive critiques. The class metonline during Fall semester 2020, using Zoom and other apps to meet and collaborate with peersand invited guests from the community and businesses.The course description in the syllabus states: This course is designed to lead students through the process of creative inquiry, design, and collaboration to explore the nexus of the arts, science, and design. Through
course of three calendar years. Included inthis initiative was the launch of the Mentoring Fellows Program, a student-led and faculty-advised group tasked with researching and improving mentorship at the college level. During thefirst year of the Mentoring Improvement Initiative, the fellows were tasked with focusing on therelationship between a graduate student and their committee head or primary advisor.The College of Engineering Mentoring Fellows, composed of three graduate students, twofaculty, and one staff member, prioritized analyzing existing data collected by the graduateStudent Experience in the Research University (gradSERU) online service. The fellowsrecognized that while most students stated they were content with the relationship