innovative and productive workforce [1]. Recognizing thisneed, significant attention and resources have been allocated in the recent past towardsincreasing female and underrepresented minority student enrollment in STEM fields, includingengineering. These efforts have resulted in a more diverse undergraduate population in USinstitutions, but overall graduation rates still do not reflect a fully diverse student body. Forinstance, women and underrepresented minorities earned only around 19% and 13% of the 2012 1bachelor degrees in engineering, a small increase from previous years [2]. Additionally, thisincrease in diversity is not uniform across disciplines; traditional engineering disciplines havemuch
by incorporating real work: real-worldrelevant assignments, ill-defined problems, sustained investigation, collaboration, and reflection.The AR Drone lab targeted all of these real work elements with its inherent real-worldimportance in technology, ill-defined experimental process, sustained investigation of errorsources, and continuous collaboration and reflection between teams. Simultaneously, it promotedthe three categories within quantitative research through this real work scenario: actualexperimental design and setup, theoretical calculations of ground speed from distance and time,and descriptive analysis of a real-world scenario.Within the “real work” learning process, it is essential to account for how the Net Generationlearns.21 The
not of the essence for the focus of this work. A detailedmethodology for similar situations of circular plates is described in literature 14,15,16,17 . It isinteresting to note that analytical accounts and approximate solutions show preponderance overexperimental data. This was realized independently by the students too and reflects in their choiceof mode of validation. Students overwhelmingly used published analytical equations to validatetheir own analytical/Mathematica work and results obtained from the Hyperworks Suite.Analytical equationsFor loaded circular plates with a central hole, for a variety of boundary conditions, analyticalequations for the maximum deflection, ymax , of the plate are described by equation 11. These arecommonly
opportunity to present the background and motivation behind the project, and the objective of the project. A brief summary of the project constraint, criteria, procedures and the results you obtained should also be presented here. Mechanics AnalysisThis section is to present the theory to calculate the maximum stress and the failure loadof the component. Material SelectionThis section should include the three candidate materials that satisfy the constraint andthe final selection. State the candidate material properties, and the final selection basedon the constraint and criteria. Discuss the result of the decision matrix. Reflect thedifference between the online data you used for
can reflect both professionally and personally; and thus can often offer experiential wisdom regarding the navigation of these two areas of life. This provision is optional and subject to the mutual interests of both faculty. 3. Miscellaneous other “lessons learned”: Additional insights may also be conveyed that would help the URM scholars achieve a fulfilling career in the engineering professoriate given more recent nuances (e.g., recently increased attention upon innovation and technology transfer in engineering academia, one of the enlisted emeriti faculty has notable expertise in “forecasting innovation pathways” for emerging technologies).In addition to periodic telecommunications, there is again a provision for the
larger variety of sources. The most typical data collection tool usedwas interviews in multiple forms—including semi-structured, one on one, and focus groups.Similarly, open-ended surveys were also used as a form of collecting qualitative participantresponses. Some unique forms of data sources were online blogs (Jafer, 2015), online forumposts and emails (Blaser, Steele, & Burgstahler, 2015), student artifacts (Gray et al., 2016), panelproceedings (Genalo et al., 2015), and reflective journals (Brewer et al., 2015). Through theseexamples, we see that in order to contribute to these divisions and the conversation on diversitywe can look beyond the conventional methods of obtaining information and incorporate noveldata sources. 4.7
of small size. Results show that astatistically significant improvement was observed in the first course of the two-coursesequence when the Diagnostic and Post-Diagnostic evaluation results were compared.Analysis of the final exam results for one course for Year 2 and Year 3 shows that there isstatistically significant improvement in performance. This change is attributed to the improvedteaching methodology presented in this paper. The views expressed in this document are those of the authorsand do not reflect the official policy or position of the UnitedStates Air Force, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. 2IntroductionFor the United
diagrammatic structures that areable to reflect ideas. Beyond its expressive visualization and communicative role the map allowsthe designer to construct a simplification and abstraction of space, manipulating image and ideain the process of exploration [31]. Like diagramming, map-making is a subtractive processimplying a fixation on one aspect of the world, be it roads, geology, or fluid current [32], [33].Through observing and marking the map, decisions are made of what is seen and what omitted.Strategic thinking is embedded in such work, an active thinking process which can serve as anexploratory design tactic.Furthermore, the designer’s engagement in two active processes of map-making, observation andannotation, add additional value. Through
and2016-2017 was that only 4% of the 2011 students rated experiments among the five leastimportant outcomes [12]. Three other outcomes were also very different in the extent to whichstudents rated them among the five least important outcomes: mechanics (35% in 2011), lifelonglearning (26% in 2011), and contemporary and historical issues (17% in 2011).RQ3. Outcome AdditionsSenior student feedback on ten potential additional BOK outcomes from the in-class exercise issummarized in Table 3. Key references that support the importance of these KSA outcomes arenoted. Only the potential outcomes assigned to the students during the in-class exercise areshown, and the list should not be considered exhaustive. The comments reflect the group of twoto three
experiential learning portion of the fermentationfundamentals previously learned in a classroom lecture. Furthermore, these key discussions mayhelp some students stay fully engaged in the laboratory and gain greater understanding than theyotherwise would sitting and waiting for the wort boil to finish.Periods of downtime during this laboratory are also crucial for individual and group reflection onthe overall fermentation process and how this exercise links to their chosen profession asenvironmental engineers. Students from each group are encouraged to communicate with theother student groups and observe and inquire regarding some of the differences across the varietyof beer flavors and types being brewed, giving them a better appreciation for the
) hierarchy of needs. We selected these two scholars’ diagrams for referencebecause they closely reflect the goals of our conceptual framework for engineering thriving. Forexample, both Norrish’s and Maslow’s diagrams are based on the theories of optimal humanfunctioning, connect several competencies studied in depth by other researchers, are measurable,and apply to educational settings. Figure 2 illustrates these two diagrams of human thriving.Figure 2. Visual representation of Positive Education, adapted from Norrish (2013) andMaslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, adapted from Maslow (1970).Next, we reviewed Norrish’s and Maslow’s justifications for their visual frameworks of humanthriving and adapted the aspects that best applied to our conceptual
traditionally-aged collegestudents who are white and cisgendered.While more quantitative data can provide essential big picture data, qualitative case studies havethe advantage of highlighting specific experiences, focusing on the particular instead of thegeneral [15]. In other words, case studies provide rich context and detail, though researchersmust be careful about generalizing what they find. In addition, assessing women’s experiencesmore quantitatively may not be possible because of the number of women present in a givenengineering program (the MSE program studied here has only 6 women out of a cohort of 22enrolled in the senior project course) and because their grades or other methods of numericalevaluation may not adequately reflect their
grades obtained in ‘A’ level examinations(as used for entry to University), was higher than students seeking entry to technologysubjects. It is not without significance that Huitching’s first publication was titled “Why sopure? (Item 27). It reflected a deeply held division in English culture. But of greatersignificance to the thesis offered here is the fact that the term “technology” is used in hismajor report (item 29), and this is taken to be synonymous with “engineering”. At the timethere were very few departments with technology in their titles in the universities but verymany departments of engineering of one kind or another. Given that schools were repeatedly asked to address the attention of the shortage ofengineers it might have been
three key features: a specializedknowledge base, self-regulation, and a commitment to public service— [1-3] elements that havebeen historically codified into a set of ethical guidelines [1, 4, 5]. While these guidelines—Professional Codes of Ethics—may help engineers appreciate what not to do [4, 5], they areinsufficiently specific to guide novice engineers through ethically ambiguous situations. As early20th century artefacts, they also tend to reproduce structural inequities embedded in the history ofthe profession, and thus fail to reflect the experiences of historically underrepresented groups ofengineers [6-14]. The Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board’s (CEAB) pairing of ethics andequity [15] demands that we look beyond the codes to
process, teachers must feel that somepromising practices and procedures are being planned. The responsibility to reassure theseteachers falls on the P-20 leader. Integrity and creditability are needed for a leader to effectchange. (Dooley, 1999). Diversity and the Impact on P-20 Education P-20 includes principles of diversity and inclusiveness and will apply tools, techniques,and methods that reflect these convictions in their decision making as a P-20 leader. Withindiversity, the goal is to include all individuals and groups wanting to participate in the P-20education development and process. P-20 educators will strive to use creative methods toengage learners. These new education learning methods will lead to an
experienceshave had a clear effect on my studies in engineering, and I expect the same may be true for myfellow veterans who have also decided to pursue undergraduate degrees in engineering. In fact,my contemplation and reflection of how experiences following my military career affected mystudies drives this very research. I have been utilizing my experiences from military service,engineering academic studies, and time working in the engineering and education industry tobetter understand the transition from active duty military member to engineering student.Ultimately, it is my hope that my experiences have offered a unique approach to this study andthereby benefit veterans seeking engineering degrees.Validity and ReliabilityDue to commonalities in our
likely to be retained [6].Effects of gender on retention and successGender influences patterns of retention and academic success in engineering programs. Inengineering majors, men typically outnumber women, as reflected in a 2017 report whichrevealed only 21.3% of bachelor’s degrees in engineering were earned by women [14]. Despitewomen earning fewer engineering degrees than men, a positive correlation between being femaleand graduation rates has been found [3]. Women frequently have been reported to be more likelythan men to earn a bachelor’s degree once enrolled, regardless of the time frame needed to earnthe degree [15] [16] [17]. The evidence, however, has not been uniform: Lord et al. [18] foundno significant difference in four-year
one. They design and build it as aprototype. Then they test and revise it to meet the needs of their client successfully. Finally,student groups present their solutions and ideas in the whole class, and they are given time forself-reflection and final revision of their models.3. Implementation of Security Modules with Model-Eliciting Activities3.1 Incorporation of Cyber Security ModulesFor each of the 9 lessons introduced in the CS 1 course, an explanation is provided of how thatlesson was incorporated into the course curriculum. Table 1 presents the lessons and the MEAproject in relation to the chapter of the textbook that is covered at the time that lesson is introduced.The book used for the course was Starting Out With Java: From Control
, and was motivatedby the obvious fact that boosting students with non-thriving behavior earlier in the semester yieldsmore time for them to make substantial adjustments for success. Specifically, identifying andboosting non-thriving students at the end of week four provides each of them with over a week tomake changes before the first exam, which accounts for 15%.The first step in this analysis was to manually calculate an adjusted final grade for each student.This adjusted grade only accounted for scores on each of the homework assignments and twoexams. This adjusted final grade reflected each students’ individual ability compared to the actualfinal grade which accounted for ≈ 50% of group project work, the discernment paper, andparticipation
mentors to create a network of support; iii) reflect on the past to learnmore about oneself and others; and iv) develop new ideas through critical thinking and questioning to becomestronger each day. In effect, EduGuide seeks to develop one’s mind-set, confidence, knowledge, skills,resilience/grit, and self-control, to enhance one’s personal development, understanding of the college culture andwhat it takes to succeed in college.The EduGuide program is used by each STEMGROW student intern throughout the summer and evaluated on theeffectiveness of both the program itself and of the mentors that act as coaches through the online platform. In thismanner, each intern can get coaching and mentoring from all the graduate, undergraduate and faculty
implementing the certification of specialty areas within the civil engineeringprofession.DisclaimerAlthough two of the authors of this paper are corresponding members of the ASCE Committeeon Preparing the Future Civil Engineer (CPFCE), we have developed this paper independently,for the purpose of contributing to the future deliberations of the CPFCE and its TCC. Thus, thispaper reflects only the authors’ personal perspectives and should not be regarded as an officialproduct of either the CPFCE or its TCC.Brief History of Credentialing in the Medical ProfessionIn considering the use of board certification as a tool for advancing the civil engineeringprofession, we begin with a brief examination of why and how credentialing was developed andimplemented
empathized with each other, and teachers’actions and language. Observations also include student notebooks which have lesson reflectionquestions as prompts for connecting lessons, empathy and real-world connections. The thirdmeans of data collection is interviews with students. Participants are asked interview questions atthe end of the program reflecting on the lessons and how they connected empathy andengineering. The interviews consist of questions such as: was there a time during the day whenyou connected with a peer or teacher and learned about how they felt about their project or thetopic at the time? If so, how did this connection affect you? and think back to a time today whenyou were faced with a challenge. What did you do to try and tackle
could have been used to simulate its real-world applications in a moreauthentic and meaningful manner. Another student reflected as below. Student 1: I was an AP Physics student. So, this wasn’t anything new to me, I guess. But just the way that it [the worksheet] was formatted - I understood the equation - but I know that some of the students had a lot of trouble, since it was a bioengineering class. A lot of kids have a lot of interest in biology, so this wasn’t probably the easiest thing for them to understand.Similarly, it can be seen that while the EV3 brick performed well up to its mandate, it was unableto provide sufficient scaffolding for students for whom the concepts were completely new. Whileat the end, all students were
and reflection in engineering learning, and student development in interdisciplinary and interprofessional spaces.Dr. Nicola W. Sochacka, University of Georgia Dr. Nicola Sochacka is the Associate Director for Research Initiation and Enablement in the Engineering Education Transformations Institute (EETI) in the College of Engineering at UGA. Supported by over 1.5M in funding, Dr. Sochacka’s research interests include systems thinking, diversity, STEAM (STEM + Art) education, and the role of empathy in engineering education and practice. Her work has been recognized through multiple best paper awards and keynote presentations at international and national conferences and workshops.Dr. Stephen Secules, Florida
N N Couple y-component Y N Y N Couple z-component Y N Y NThe last section of the worksheet prompts students to analyze how the reactions must change tomaintain equilibrium when they remove either hinge. Students explore how a reaction couplemust develop when only a single hinge is present and reflect back on how the two hinges worktogether to generate an equivalent couple in the previous configuration. They also consider anddiscuss how changing the direction of the cable tension would affect the system. Figure 5. Activity 3: Two and Three-Force
layouts. To further deepen the learning effect, we allowadjusting parameters for a subset of the layouts so that users can gain instantaneous feedback.P4: Comparison. When studying multiple related concepts, it is often helpful to compare their respective strengthsand weaknesses. For graph visualization, the primary choice lies in the selection of a particular layout to draw agiven graph. GraphVisual supports simultaneous visualization of two different graph layouts of the same data set intwo side-by-side display panels, allowing students to make easy comparison through brushing and linking (i.e., theselection made in one view is dynamically reflected in the other view). Furthermore, the two display panels reactsynchronically to interactions such