Engineering from Lehigh University. Dr. Lenox served for over 28 years as a commissioned officer in the U.S Army Field Artillery in a variety of leadership positions in the U.S., Europe, and East Asia. He retired at the rank of Colonel. During his military career, Dr. Lenox spent 15 years on the engi- neering faculty of USMA – including five years as the Director of the Civil Engineering Division. Upon his retirement from the U.S. Army in 1998, he joined the staff of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). In his position as educational staff leader of ASCE, he managed several new educational initia- tives – collectively labeled as Project ExCEEd (Excellence in Civil Engineering Education). As ASCE’s Executive Vice
. ”Sustainable design based thinking, beyond the past environmental focus has unlimited potential in solving social, ethical and economic problems in society.” Dan is currently earning his PhD at Coventry University in the UK, through his research of his thesis entitled ”Differentiation by Design R . A native of Chicago, Dan attended St. Xavier University, earning a Bachelors Degree in Biology, with a minor in Chemistry. Upon graduating, Dan embarked on a career in the chemical and plastics industry where he applied his science education, and natural ability in engineering and leadership to a fast track business career. While serving in roles of increasing responsibility in the rapidly globalizing marketplace of the 1980
Paper ID #17315Teaching Students How to Create Innovative Design Solutions Within a Prod-uct Development ContextDr. Darren C. Olson, Central Washington University Dr. Olson teaches at Central Washington University, where he is the coordinator of the M.S. program in Engineering Technology. He earned a Ph.D. in Technology Management from Indiana State University, specializing in Quality Systems. He also earned an M.Ed. from Bowling Green State University in Career and Technology Education, and a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Brigham Young University. His interests are related to innovative problem solving, technology
innovations and research-based instructional strategies, 1, 2, 3, 4yet most engineering faculty continue to rely on traditional methods of delivery in their courses. Over a decade ago, Felder et al.5 explained that the gap between the current state ofknowledge and the practice results are due to the perception and reality that good teaching is notvalued in terms of career advancement. The authors made a compelling case for the need to cre-ate a positive campus climate for good teaching. Further research has shown that many facultywho attempt to implement research-based instructional practices (RBIS) stop using them whenthey encounter challenges or barriers.2 These include lack of class time, lack of instructor time,lack of rewards or recognition
as soon as they begin their academic careers andthe UoG staff can introduce its pedagogical approach to the students as well as to the UESTC staffinvolved in the Joint School. It has also meant that UoG teaching and administration staff havebeen actively involved in the day-to-day evolution of the Joint School from the day the JointSchool opened. With the enrollment of the second cohort of students, the Joint School has a totalof 379 students and 24 academic and administrative staff members – 21 employed by UESTC and3 employed by UoG.Advertisements of the UoG staff positions to support the UoG-UESTC Joint School were posted Page
involved in providing engineeringservices to communities who are in needs. Firstly, the benefit is for the community that is servedby students, and secondly, students are encouraged to connect and reflect how their educationconnects to their professional career. Through the experience students feel better about theiractions and understand the need and therefore the impact engineers have on a community. Thisencourages them to learn more about their chosen profession, and feel more confident about theirachievements. Also, students have a chance to practice and apply what they learn in class in areal project where they are exposed to the results of their design. The positive side of the servicelearning is at the end, the students are giving back to
Program approaches its 20th anniversary, retrospection, insight, and application of lessonslearned to formulate a vision of the future are appropriate. The past and current directors of theProgram have gathered together to create a joint retrospective. This retrospective is stronglyinfluenced by the authors personal experiences both in and outside of the classroom, paperspublished by the collective authors through the years, extensive reviews of current student Page 26.633.2learning through pre/post course surveys6 and discussions with graduates that considered boththe career impact of the Program as well as views of the strengths and areas where
by peers and superiors, • anxiety regarding external motivators of grades, pay and future career opportunities, • anxiety regarding criticism of one’s mastery, • acceptance or rejection of critical comments that may improve the project results and team success. The net result of the interacting emotions may be anything from a meltdown of the engineer’s confidence (and concomitant drop in innovation-related competencies) to a team experience that improves the product, learns about the product/customer domain and builds team esprit de corps (and builds innovation-related competencies of individuals). These outcomes depend on many things including the dynamics of the design review and tone and content of
for academicreasons, in a manner consistent with the stated academic standards and policies of the school. Inthose cases, we use the date their graduation was expected before expulsion.We examine interior metrics derived from the master dataset as follows. We used the actual orexpected graduation data, plus our data of when we were in contact with students, to establish thesemester of first contact. This parameter establishes when in their academic career they firstneeded our help. We also compile academic outcome data by cohort, in order to examine howdifferent cohorts respond to the services we provided under the two different organizationalmodels described here. We examine the data by both gender and race. Finally, we parse the databy
in the U.S., Europe, and East Asia. He retired at the rank of Colonel. During his military career, Dr. Lenox spent 15 years on the engineering faculty of USMA – including five years as the Director of the Civil Engineering Di- vision. Upon his retirement from the U.S. Army in 1998, he joined the staff of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). In his position as educational staff leader of ASCE, he managed several new educational initiatives – collectively labeled as Project ExCEEd (Excellence in Civil Engineering Education). As ASCE’s Executive Vice President, Dr. Lenox led several educational and professional career-development projects for the civil engineering profession – with the overall objective of
University. She received her BS in Chemical Engineer- ing in 2014 and was involved in the Connections Chemistry Review program for over 5 years. Kristen is currently pursuing her Master’s Degree in Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Tech, while working full time as an engineer in the Edison Engineering Development Program at GE Power & Water.Dr. Paul A. DiMilla, Northeastern University Paul A. DiMilla is an Associate Academic Specialist in Chemistry & Chemical Biology and Chemi- cal Engineering at Northeastern University. During his academic career at Carnegie Mellon University, Boston University, and Olin College he has been the recipient of the first Whitaker Young Investigator Award from the BMES, a Searle
Reflectionsn (instructors) = 4 and n (students) =140 INTEREST/ATTAINMENT VALUE Agree Disagree motivated me to do well in the course 59% 41% was an effective way to increase engagement 79% 20% helped me better understand my own learning 69% 31% increased my level of responsibility 59% 41%UTILITY VALUE Agree Disagreewill be of value after graduation 81% 19%was useful in career and/or
paper has focused on the pedagogical implications of us-ing the PAC to teach engineers to think like intrepreneurs. The short-term value of teaching withthe PAC is to highlight how decisions are made in the complex and rapidly changing environmentwithin a company. The long-term value is to develop habits of mind and action that will enablethem to make impactful contributions throughout their careers.8 AcknowledgementsThe author would like to thank the members of the Bucknell Biomedical Engineering Department,The Small Business Development Center at Bucknell University, Chris Sullivan, Charles Kim andSteve Shooter for their helpful conversations and comments.References [1] Henry Petroski, Henry Petroski, and Henry Petroski. To engineer is
sometimes when I'm like I can't believe I suck at math, like why?” (1stinterview), “I guess career-wise maybe so I'm not very strong at math” (2nd interview), and thefollowing passage from the 3rd interview: I realized, like, one: I sucked at (ooh… gosh...). Um, you're probably gonna be sick of hearing me talk after this!... S: No no... R: 1- I suck at math. S: Ok... Page 26.1582.6 R: I don't suck, I was, was pretty weak at math. I didn't have natural. My sister has a lot more aptitude for learning math.The repetition of this theme, in both 1st and 2nd person speech, suggests that this is a
interest in pursuing in college and as a career. But there is adichotomy - mathematics is a precise science, and any problem solving engineering paradigmprovides an optimal (or near optimal) solution. Anyone with an engineering perspective learns toappreciate this and continue to combine the two skills advantageously. However, not all studentssignificantly develop this skill when learning math in their curriculum as they may not see theconnection between the theoretical concepts in the subject and the practical problems associatedwith STEM fields. This lack of a connection could negatively affect the students’ performanceand interest in STEM. Our initial focus was to develop the robot as a tool for problem solving 1-3.We also made sure that it is
continuesto develop expertise.We now turn to Coral and her lack of a shift toward greater access to programming. In Coral’spre interview, she already expressed a strong sense of what career she wants to pursue. Shedescribed wanting to be a mechanical engineer and having attended other camps related toengineering. Coral also identifies herself as a builder, and on her school’s robotics team, shefeels more competent building rather than programming. To her, a lack of background orcoursework in programming prevents her from taking on a programming role, and she says shewould be able to program after taking a formal class.By the mid-camp interview, we don't see much of a shift in access. She describes the Arduinocomponent as “brushing up on skills” and
departure for making better informed decisions about the allocation of resources, educationalprogramming and support systems for first-generation Latina students in STEM professions. Thisresearch can begin discussion on the formulation of best practices about how to improveretention, achievement, undergraduate graduation rates, and career preparation of first-generationLatinas in engineering. This research may elucidates some of the reasons why Latinas chooseengineering in college and why they continue in engineering using Achievement Goal Theory(AGT) as the theoretical framework. Page 26.1291.8Research QuestionsIn this paper, we used the lens of
of numerous awards and honors, including the National Science Foundation’s most prestigious, Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) award. She is a Fellow of the American So- ciety of Engineering Education, holds membership in a number of organizations and presently serves on the National Advisory Board of the National Society of Black Engineers. Page 26.1304.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Reaching Out to the Masses: Building Literacy About Engineering Amongst Non-Engineering StudentsEngineering literacy gained initial
havebroadened. The prototyping, teamwork, communication, and data-analysis skills that studentshave gained early in the curriculum have also greatly increased the value of our freshmen tofaculty research programs and others who hire our students as interns.Introduction Intellectual creativity, experimentation and active inquiry are at the heart of a rewardingengineering career, but often this fact is obscured during the early years of a chemical Page 26.1337.2engineering education. Teaching methods that promote such qualities in the classroom may notonly be more authentic; they have been shown to correspond with significant gains in studentlearning
in physical science.Dr. Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette enay Purzer is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education. She is the recipient of a 2012 NSF CAREER award, which examines how engineering students approach innovation. She serves on the editorial boards of Science Education and the Journal of Pre-College Engineering Educa- tion (JPEER). She received a B.S.E with distinction in Engineering in 2009 and a B.S. degree in Physics Education in 1999. Her M.A. and Ph.D. degrees are in Science Education from Arizona State University earned in 2002 and 2008, respectively
engineering disciplines, butnot very many recently that are specific to aerospace. How can engineering educationresearchers leverage research tools from other disciplines to conduct research in an aerospacecontext? Engineering education researchers apply research to link professional practice toclassroom practice in order to keep the classroom up-to-date or even anticipate the knowledgeand skills that engineers will need to be successful in their careers. Engineering educationresearchers also investigate how students learn, from preschool years all the way through lifelonglearning as adults. Because the uniqueness of the learner and context of learning influence eachother, researchers must pay attention to the learner, the content, and the
. Over his career Mr. Orlando focused on integrated circuit design for advanced electronics systems using the state of the art commercial design environments. Currently, Mr. Orlando is the lead for the Integrated Microelectronics Research Facility.Dr. Farid T. Khafizov, University of Texas, Dallas Farid Khafizov received a Master of Science degree from the University of Kazan in Kazan, Russia, and a Ph.D. degree in mathematics from the University of North Texas, in Denton, Texas, U.S.A. In 1996 he joined Nortel Networks, assuming various functional roles including management and technical leader- ship positions in wireless system research, design, and business development. In 2007 he began working at Huawei, where he
. Requiring students torevise writing in response to specific feedback may motivate them to pay attention to feedbackand apply it to improve their writing, especially when they consider the written productimportant to their career success. Feedback delivered within the context of professional work isespecially salient to students. Some research has found that participation in engineering designprojects provides opportunities for coaching and mentoring in professional skills, including 1teamwork and communication [10]. Researchers concluded that feedback on professional skillshelped students become enculturated into the community of engineering practice.Clearly, the acquisition of writing skills is an
curriculum in her classroom. She continued working on STEM research, specifically prob- lem scoping for young children, at Purdue University in the summer of 2017.Dr. Tamara J. Moore, Purdue University, West Lafayette Tamara J. Moore, Ph.D., is a Professor in the School of Engineering Education and Director of STEM Integration in the INSPIRE Institute at Purdue University. Dr. Moore’s research is centered on the integra- tion of STEM concepts in K-12 and postsecondary classrooms in order to help students make connections among the STEM disciplines and achieve deep understanding. Her work focuses on defining STEM inte- gration and investigating its power for student learning. Tamara Moore received an NSF Early CAREER award
: Did your above bin selection change from the bin selection made as a team in class? (A) Yes, (B) No, (C) Other - If yes, describe how your second bin selection was different from that made in class. If no, describe why it did not change. - Q4: If a friend or someone else who contributed to your trash bag asked you about the class on Friday, October 6 (the date module was implemented in class), what would you say? - Q5: How do you think this “Bring in Your Trash” activity could be improved? - Q6: What factors do you think you will consider as you make choices about materials in your future career as an engineer
Computer Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University and his B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Cincinnati. His research and teaching interests include wearable computing, electronic textiles, and interdisciplinary design teams for pervasive computing. In 2006 he was selected for the National Science Foundation’s Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) for his research in e-textile-based wearable computing.Dr. Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co-directs the Vir- ginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communication in engineering design
from multiple assessors directly tied to the established criteria. Studentswere then given time to reflect upon, and then address, the comments received through theconceptualization and experimentation stages of the Cycle.In closing, the development of the cornerstone project described here has had an overall positiveimpact, as students appreciated being “given a chance to solve a real world, open ended problemthrough our coding which will be useful in both our college careers and our careers later in life.”Those interested in implementing a similar project at their institution are welcomed to contact theauthors for additional information.References1. D. A. Kolb, Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development
workshops and collaborative writing.Prof. Eva Chi, University of New Mexico Eva Chi is an Associate Professor in the Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering Department at the University of New Mexico. The research in her lab is focused on understanding the dynamics and structures of macromolecular assemblies including proteins, polymers, and lipid membranes. Undergrad- uates, graduate students, and postdoctoral scholars are trained in a multidisciplinary environment, utilizing modern methodologies to address important problems at the interface between chemistry, physics, engi- neering, and biology preparing the trainees for careers in academe, national laboratories, and industry. In addition to research, she