Paper ID #48772BOARD # 44: WiP: Empowering TAs through Metacognitive and CommunicationSkills DevelopmentProf. Jennifer Fiegel, The University of Iowa Dr. Jennifer Fiegel is a professor of chemical and biochemical engineering at the University of Iowa. She earned her B.S. in chemical engineering from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst and her Ph.D. in chemical and biomolecular engineering from the Johns Hopkins University. She started her faculty career at the University of Iowa in 2006. During her time at Iowa, she has built a research program focused on developing better drug delivery systems to treat infections in
repeating the activity is providedfor teachers and practitioners. This paper explores the development of the “Pack for Space”activity.IntroductionEngineering outreach activities seek to increase interest in engineering as a future career [1].Outreach activities outside of school have been shown to be effective in increasing engagementin Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) [2]. Outreach activities are important asnot all schools have access to STEM coursework and after school STEM programs have beenshown to be more expensive than non-STEM programs [3]. STEM outreach involves andimpacts many different groups including the students themselves, administrators, outreachproviders, parents and guardians, universities, K-12 schools
, encouragingconstructive feedback and collaborative refinement. The STEL practices prepare students forsuccess in STEM careers, promoting resilience and adaptability in the face of evolvingworkplace technological demands. Educators can encourage students to develop skills essentialfor technological and engineering literacy, such as appropriate communication practices, criticalthinking, effective collaboration, and the ability to adapt to challenges by integrating designnotebooks into pre-college engineering education curricula.Method This work-in-progress qualitative study explores the use of physical and digitalengineering notebooks through a convenience sample of 24 students enrolled in a technology,engineering, and design education course. The course
Maryland. Prior to his academic career, Stephen was an acoustical consultant for 5 years in both London, UK and Silicon Valley, CA. His research has focused on culture and equity in engineering education, particularly undergraduate contexts, pedagogy, and student support. Through his work he aims to use critical qualitative, video-based, participatory, and ethnographic methods to look at everyday educational settings in engineering and shift them towards equity and inclusion. He also leads the Equity Research Group where he mentors graduate and undergraduate students in pursuing critical and action-oriented research.Tekla Nicholas, Florida International University ©American Society for
and the developmental networks of early career engineers working in industry inspired by her time working in industry as a mechanical design and analysis engineer.Ms. Oluwakemi Johnson, University of Michigan Oluwakemi (Oh-LOO-wah-keh-me) Johnson is a second-year PhD student in the Engineering Education Research Program at the University of Michigan. She is advised by Dr. Aaron Johnson and works as a research assistant on projects focusing on engineering judgment and open-ended modeling problems.Katelyn Churakos, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Katelyn Churakos is an undergraduate research assistant in the Department of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo. She is majoring in
Engineering Living Learning Community (LLC) is another unique programfeature to enhance community among the SEED scholars. A general description of the programand preliminary results from the students’ self-reported sense of belonging in engineering,engineering design self-efficacy, and engineering identity are presented in this paper.Description of the SEED ProgramThe main goal of the Scholars of Excellence in Engineering Design (SEED) program at TexasState University (TXST) is to support two cohorts of talented, low-income, first-time-in-college(FTIC) domestic engineering students with unmet financial need by providing them scholarships;individual mentoring by a faculty member in their chosen major; and a suite of academicenrichment, career
AG, where the NanoFrazor is developed and supported. She has many years of experience in nanofabrication, through her research and product development work throughout her career. She is enthusiastic about making nanofabrication accessible to students and researchers of many backgrounds.Brett Michael Mann, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Brett Mann is currently pursuing a Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering at Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI), with concentrations in Computer Engineering and RF Engineering. As part of his studies, Brett has worked on several projects, including a research collaboration with Heidelberg Instruments Nano AG, aimed at demystifying nanofabrication and
single institution so results may not be generalizable tocivil engineering students more broadly. Future research in this area could help to further refineour understanding of civil engineering students’ perceptions of engineering design. Conductinglongitudinal studies or similar studies of midcareer students would provide a more detailedpicture of the ways in which definitions of design change across a students’ course career. Doingso with additional attention dedicated to past and concurrent course work as well as co-op andinternship experience might help to surface and solidify connections between student responsesand educational and work experiences. Finally, the definition of engineering design in the ABETcriteria is one of several that
, greatly enriched my learning experience and made this research journey ameaningful one.ReferencesCapital One Tech. (2025, April 3). Advancing AI research: industry & academia collaborations. Capital One. https://www.capitalone.com/tech/ai/ai-research-industry-academia/Allen, L. K., & Kendeou, P. (2023). ED-AI Lit: An Interdisciplinary Framework for AI Literacy in Education. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/23727322231220339Cadaret, M. C., Hartung, P. J., Subich, L. M., & Weigold, I. K. (2016). Stereotype threat as a barrier to women entering engineering careers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 99, 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb
Co-Director of the Institute for Interdisciplinary Transition Services. In 2024, Dr. McCall received a National Science Foundation CAREER grant to identify systemic opportunities for increasing the participation of people with disabilities in engineering. Her award-winning publications have been recognized by leading engineering education research journals at both national and international levels. Dr. McCall has led several workshops promoting the inclusion of people with disabilities and other minoritized groups in STEM. She holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in civil engineering with a structural engineering emphasis.Daniel Kane, Utah State University Daniel Kane is a third-year Ph.D. student in the department of
business. Before that, he was at Dell Technologies, where he led cross functional teams developing cutting-edge hardware and automation products for large fortune 500 companies and drove technology acceleration through merger and acquisition. Glen started his career at Verizon, where he played a key role in product steering, new technology adoption, technical design and automation of global network systems.William Ray Freeman ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 WIP: Democratizing Generative AI Quiz Creation: Accelerating Assessment Development in Engineering Education John Hassell Christopher Freeze Ahmed Butt
do.It should have an action or outcome for the students to achieve. Measurable: The objectiveshould include measurable indicators of success. This means identifying how students' progressor achievement will be tracked or assessed. Achievable: The objective should be realistic andachievable, given the students' existing knowledge level and the time available for the course.Relevant: The objective should be meaningful and connected to the student's overall goals,career aspirations, or the course's long-term objectives. Time-bound: The objective should havea clear timeline or deadline, specifying when students are expected to complete or achieve theobjective.An example of a LO for an introductory class that teaches to program using MATLAB would
of the46 following four areas: academic and career advising, high school preparation, engineering structure and47 curriculum, and faculty relations[9]. This paper focuses on faculty relations because, historically, 148 universities have relegated retention issues to staff and advisors. The importance of faculty influence on49 student retention is an under-researched and under-explored area. Specifically, faculty relations can be50 shaped through specific teaching practices instructors can use to increase student retention. Research51 supports the claim that student-professor relationships are vital in promoting the success of engineering52 students [10], [11]. One
://discovery.ebsco.com/c/3czfwv/viewer/html/zqo6gscrcv (accessed Jan. 17, 2023).[7] E. A. Cech, “The intersectional privilege of white able-bodied heterosexual men in STEM,” Science Advances, vol. 8, no. 24, p. eabo1558, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abo1558.[8] E. Krutsch and V. Roderick, “STEM Day: Explore Growing Careers | U.S. Department of Labor Blog,” U.S. Department of Labor Blog, Nov. 04, 2022. https://blog.dol.gov/2022/11/04/stem-day-explore-growing-careers (accessed Feb. 05, 2023).[9] K. Gibbs, “Diversity in STEM: What It Is and Why It Matters,” Scientific American Blog Network. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/diversity-in-stem-what-it-is-and- why-it-matters/ (accessed Feb. 11, 2023).[10] CDC, “Disability Impacts
alongside traditional STEM curricula. Theseparation between STEM and creativity has drawbacks for both parties. For example, STEMprofessionals have missed opportunities of participating in design-thinking careers, and artprofessionals have missed the technical knowledge to provide innovative solutions [10]. Inaddition, STEM faculty and practitioners have suffered a disconnection from creativity andabstract thinking, while artistic community members have struggled to keep pace with thequickly advancing technological society [11].In the classroom, educators should encourage the early development of new ideas to fostercreativity and innovation with engineering design. Learning from industry partners' successstories can provide insights into practical
community. Eachsemester we selected a PESP alum, who had graduated from the university, to talk to the studentsabout her job and career plans at the Reunion party. The Reunion party occasionally featuredguests from industry.In addition to the pay for the peer leaders and PhD stipends, the only other costs involved inrunning ESP were the light suppers provided to the two workshops (approximately $200 perweek) and the cost of the end of semester reunion dinner.Admissions practices at the University of PennsylvaniaAt the University of Pennsylvania, students can begin freshman year with a declared major orthey can be undecided, which is called curriculum deferred in Penn Engineering and undeclaredin the College of Arts and Sciences. The vast majority
University. She received her M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Carnegie Mellon in 2009, and her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Brown University in 2007. Her work has focused on studying the engineering design process through cognitive studies, and extending those findings to the development of methods and tools to facilitate more effective and inspired design and innovation. Dr. Fu is a recipient of the NSF CAREER Award, the ASME Design Theory and Methodology Young Investigator Award, the ASME Atlanta Section 2015 Early Career Engineer of the Year Award, and was an Achievement Rewards For College Scientists (ARCS) Foundation Scholar.Prof. Mitchell Nathan, University of Wisconsin - Madison Mitchell J. Nathan is a
skills and collaborative and inclusive teams into the curriculum. Dr. Rivera-Jim´enez graduated from the University of Puerto Rico at Mayag¨uez with a B.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering. She earned an NSF RIEF award recognizing her effort in transitioning from a meaningful ten-year teaching faculty career into engineering education research. Before her current role, she taught STEM courses at diverse institutions such as HSI, community college, and R1 public university. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Social Responsibility Views in Science and Engineering: An Exploratory Study Among Engineering Undergraduate
differingidentities change people’s perspectives nor how to articulate that properly until late in myundergraduate career. As a white, first-generation, queer, neurodivergent woman; I am able torecognize that there are certain spaces that were built for me and others that were not. I haveworked to understand my own intersecting privileged and marginalized identities, and held a lotof anger towards institutional power structures that often fail minoritized communities. I do feelcomfortable questioning engineering culture and honestly would like to use my power andprivilege to change it to help improve the experiences of future generations of students. Aschange occurs slowly, my personal struggle involves directing my passion and energypragmatically in order
for novice engineers is to present the results in a format following the key points of an RFP. This is a good career advice. Making it easy for reviewers to identify responsive points certainly will encourage positive responses. Developing a Hypothesis – Novice engineers will need guidance to develop meaningfulhypothesis. By definition, hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon based on previousobservations. To be valid, the hypothesis must be accurately and concisely stated. It should not be anunsubstantiated wild guess. It should be possible to validate or discredit the hypothesis. This is not a simpletask for students for whom psychrometric principles are newly learned concepts. A practicum exercise
Engineering, English,Communication, Rhetoric, Theatre, Visual Art and Design, Science and Technology Studies, andEngineering Education. Our teaching responsibilities run the gamut of transdisciplinaryinstruction, including communication, science and society, professionalism, team skills,leadership and ethics, and responsibilities as an artist-in-residence, with instruction andsupervision at the undergraduate and graduate levels. Our research interests reflect theseactivities and our career stages span from graduate school to near retirement. We are united by acommon interest in how engineering students develop mindsets that enable effective humanisticpractice, and we share common values in supporting our students’ development of
projects can foster the inclusion of students with learning disabilities (Daniela and Lytras, 2019; Nanou and Karampatzakis, 2022). In the case of tertiary education, industrial-scale robots are used to prepare students for careers in industry by emphasizing aspects such as hardware, software, and human-machine interfaces (Nagai, 2001; Brell-Çokcan and Braumann, 2013). However, industrial-scale robots are expensive to purchase. In addition, there is usually some oversight over their usage due to time-sharing and to prevent damage, which prevents "free-play" by students. Some solutions to this include the use of miniature robots and the use of online labs (Mallik and Kapila, 2020; Stein and Lédeczi, 2021). Though these reduce the cost of the setups
people, but rather done by atask force that surveyed well over 3000 correspondents. These correspondents included 1470senior engineers and engineering managers, representing companies with as small as 1 employeeto as large as more than 46,800 employees, and having upwards of more than 30 years ofexperience. 42 responses were gathered from differing academic institutions, which resulted in aplenary, which further probed 85 department heads on questions relating to the survey. In a finaladdition, 635 responses from early career (0-10 years of experience,) were gathered to provide athird perspective on the strengths and weaknesses of engineering education [7].The survey presented 15 key skills and asked participants to determine which skills were
university. Hence, keeping the general educationcourses including Math and Science courses would better serve the purpose of this program.Summer 2019 marked the first term for curriculum development with six new courses developedand submitted for approval by multiple campuses, the College of Engineering, and the AcademicAffairs Office. For some of the existing courses, the steering committee negotiated withdepartments to offer separate sections for engineering technology students.II. Defining Program Objectives and Student OutcomesProgram educational objectives are the broad statements that describe the long-term career andprofessional goals that are envisioned for the graduates of the program to achieve. It is a commonmisunderstanding among
postdoc at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology before starting her academic career at Oklahoma State University (OSU), where she was an assistant professor 2014-2020 and then a tenured associate professor until January 2021 before moving to UB. Dr. Ford Versypt leads the Systems Biomedicine and Pharmaceutics Laboratory. She was the 2020-2021 Chair for the ASEE Chemical Engineering Division (CHED). Dr. Ford Versypt has been recognized with the NSF CAREER Award, ASEE CHED Ray W. Fahien Award and Joseph J. Martin Award, and AIChE CAST Division David Himmelblau Award for Innovations in Computer-Based Chemical Engineering Education. She is an Academic Trustee of Computer Aids for Chemical Engineering Corporation
working on activities in teams, with instructors and tutors providingcoaching and consultation; and (4) balanced grade weighting so that 50% is based on the teamactivities, and 50% is based on individual tests.Thus, I retained testing, but for the first time ever in my career, a significant portion of the graderewarded activities other than tests, and other than analytical abstraction. Tasks such assketching, measuring, observing, and explaining can be completed by following relatively simpledirections, often providing a ‘safe’ environment to encourage activity. Results that are not‘correct’ are not severely penalized if well documented and explained, and in fact, are often usedfor starting deeper discussions. Also, the team-based structure
University of Missouri (2006), and an M.S. in Environmental and Water Resources Engineering (2010), M.P.Aff in Public Affairs (2010), and Ph.D. in Civil Engineering (2013) from The University of Texas at Austin. She received the National Science Foundation CAREER award and the UCOWR Early Career Award for Applied Research for her research work on the energy- water nexus. She was honored with the 2015 Girl Scouts of Central Illinois Woman of Distinction Award in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics, the 2018 Rose Award for Teaching Excellence, and the 2018 AEESP Award for Outstanding Teaching in Environmental Engineering and Science. Dr. Stillwell has also been included on the List of Teachers Ranked as
in a particular field [e.g., 19]. Similarly,students’ skills development in a particular field are outlined in the curriculum and assessedagainst specific learning objectives. There are general skills (often called transferable skills) aswell as domain-specific skills. An individual’s skills proficiency can be judged by the results oftasks performed. It can be judged on the continuum from low to high.Thinking, skill, and knowledge interact with each other to control students’ career or vocationaldevelopment. But literacy can also be thought of as having three interdependent dimensions:knowledge, capabilities, and ways of thinking and decision making [e.g., 40]. Literacy, then, isbest conceptualized as including three dimensions of literacy
PU was EPU1 (post-test: I have set some long-range goals formyself), EPU6 (post-test: I have a plan for my career development), while the most ‘difficultto achieve’ item was SPU7 (pre-test: I have a life plan that makes use of my specific talents).Meanwhile, in sub-construct OR, the most ‘easiest to achieve’ items agreed by the studentswas EOR5 (pre-test: I organize the materials I will need for a job before I begin it), while themost ‘difficult to achieve’ item was SOR6 (pre-test: I am well organized). In sub-constructRP, the most ‘easiest to achieve’ items agreed by the students was ERP2 (post-test: I can tellthe moment that things start to go wrong), and the most ‘difficult to achieve’ item was SRP1(pre-test: I can recognize problems at