establishing relationships among the students and betweenstudents and faculty.12 In most cases, this entry-level course will be the only engineering coursethat the students will take until they are sophomores or juniors since the first two years of mostengineering curricula are taken up with calculus, humanities and basic science courses. Many of the successful entry-level engineering courses include some form of experientiallearning. Experiential learning has been identified as an effective way to help engineeringstudents develop both technical skills and non-technical skills such as oral and writtencommunication, project management, leadership, the ability to work on multi-disciplinary teams,a good understanding engineering ethics and
Negotiating Comfort in Difference: Making the Case for Interdisciplinary Collaboration April A. Kedrowicz University of Utah/College of EngineeringAbstractThe face of engineering education is changing. Engineering students’ education not onlyemphasizes technical skills learned through math, science, and computer technology, but inmany cases, also has a leadership focus, manifested through an emphasis on oral communication,writing, teamwork, and ethics. In response to the growing demand for engineers to occupypositions of leadership in organizations upon graduation, engineering educators have had torethink the approach taken to
Session 3161 Service-Learning in CHE Senior Design Lisa G. Bullard, Patti H. Clayton, and Steven W. Peretti North Carolina State University ABET 2000 Criterion 3 explicitly states that engineering graduates must have “anunderstanding of professional and ethical responsibility,” “an ability to communicateeffectively,” and “the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineeringsolutions in a global and societal context.” Service-learning is the approach we chose to enhanceour students’ capacities in these areas. For the past two years, senior projects containing
Session 1661The Whammy Line as a Tool for Fostering Moral Imagination Rosanne L. Welker, W. Bernard Carlson University of VirginiaA central goal of engineering ethics instruction should be to help students develop their moralimaginations. According to Patricia Werhane, moral imagination refers to the ability ofprofessionals to imagine a variety of outcomes for their decisions. Werhane emphasizes that ifone is unable to imagine different scenarios, then one cannot assess the risk or apply a frameworkfor moral reasoning (such as utilitarianism, Kantian duty ethics, Lockean rights ethics, orAristotelian virtue ethics).1 However, we have
developed on separate (and not interrelated) topics.The eight modules were chosen such that half were more theoretical, and half were moreadvanced. Sliced differently, half were on an introductory level, and half advanced.Finally half were natural candidates for acoustic demonstrations, the other half not. Eachof the eight modules is a unique combination of those three dimensions see Table 1below.Volunteers were recruited from the undergraduate population in the engineering faculty,and were asked to sign a consent form, approved by the University’s Ethics ReviewBoard. The recruitment lecture explained the purpose and method of the experiment, andcontained a sample module. During the following four weeks, a rigid presentationschedule was followed
descending order from most important to leastimportant. This table is ordered by the responses of Bachelor degree alumni in descending order.It is felt that this group (being the largest responding sample) would provide the best response of“skill importance” to their career. However, responses are similar between all groups. Theareas of greatest importance are problem solving, accomplishing tasks within the organization,teamwork, oral communications, professional ethics, writing skills, and use of personalcomputer tools. Page 3.229.3 (3) Table 3: Most Important
archives from the Three Mile Island,Chernobyl, Apollo 13, Challenger, and Exxon Valdez cases, and other resources such as thediscussion of the Challenger case maintained at the World Wide Web Ethics Center forEngineering and Science located at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Documentaryvideos, obtained from PBS and various broadcast and cable channels, include footage of thedisasters and/or their aftermaths for all of the major case studies considered in the course as wellas such cases as a ship explosion that leveled downtown Texas City, Texas, Three Mile Island,Apollo 13, and a gas leak which occurred at a Union Carbide plant in Institute, West Virginia.Students are also required to screen the feature film, Apollo 13.Students are
appropriate department to ensure sound work ethics and academic integrity,while offering the student an opportunity to assume greater responsibility. The Construction Management Department of the College of Engineering has offeredstudent internships for over 10 years. During this period (ended in 1996), over 130 constructionmanagement and/or engineering students have participated in a one-semester internship with 73different employers in both the private and the public sectors. Of those 130 students, 32(approximately 25%) continued their internship for a second semester, with 23 (approximately70%) returning to the same employer. A small number of students (less than 10%) have
a technological activity, and not one that engages inconversation about the impact of new (and, indeed ‘old’) technologies on society. It may beassumed that these can be safely left to the lawyers, government, and by no means least,parents. Questions of child suicide, for example, allegedly caused by social media, and othersimilar behavioural problems have not been matters for TELPhE or ASEE although they havea powerful impact on the mind. That is, before matters of the ethics of design of such systemsare considered. My friends in the Ethics Division will forgive me if I say this is not just amatter for them or TELPhE but ASEE as whole. Last year’s developments in AI with theintroduction of ChatboxGPT surely make this clear.The problems
designed to foster a more inclusive and socially consciousengineering identity, highlighting the importance of ethical considerations in engineeringpractices. This integration is crucial for preparing future engineers to address complex real-worldproblems that span beyond technical solutions.The existing computing course (Introduction to Computing for Engineering, typically taken bymost engineering students in the spring semester of their first-year) historically was focused onteaching the technical concepts of coding and an introduction to data science (data manipulation,visualization, and interpretation). The experimental redesign of the course involves incorporatingjustice-based activities that encourage students to analyze ethically complex
assessment results show a very strong correlation between student satisfaction measured bythe survey and active experience in the classroom. The assessment of the course by students hasled to increased hands-on projects, multimedia technology usage, computer simulations, andassignments linked more closely to real-world applications.I. IntroductionES 107, Introduction to Engineering, is a three semester-hour course introducing students toengineering disciplines, professional practice and ethics, creative problem solving, basic computerskills, team skills, and technical presentations. The course is required for all freshman engineeringstudents and a majority of non-engineering majors at the University of New Haven take it as ascientific
professional, ethical and social responsibilities,j. a respect for diversity and a knowledge of contemporary professional, societal and global issues, andk. a commitment to quality, timeliness, and continuous improvement.The general criteria apply to all ET programs at both associate and baccalaureate degree levels.For programs in different particular disciplines, additional outcomes, specific to the disciplineand degree level are listed. The program criteria for “Civil Engineering Technology andSimilarly Named Programs” are, for example, listed as follows2: OutcomesAssociate degree programs must demonstrate that graduates are capable of: a. utilizing graphic techniques to produce engineering
results highlight national and gender differences in students’ perception of theirdevelopment in ABET-related skills. The American students rated themselves higher increativity, teamwork, ethics, facility with tools of engineering practice, and in recognizing globalimpact. The Korean students assessed their skills higher in design, problem solving, andcommunication skills. There was no statistically significant difference in leadership or analyticalskills. However, in spite of apparent national differences, the students follow similar genderpatterns. The men were more confident in technical and analytical skills, while the women weremore confident in communication and teamwork skills. As such, both cultures could benefit frominterventions that
together onto a printed circuit board. In modern digital systems design, softwarecode describes the functionality of each chip. The code for these chips is available(usually for purchase) so multiple chips can be fabricated in one chip (called a System-on-a-Chip). Our digital systems design course incorporates this concept. Students learnto integrate 3rd-party modules into their own digital designs and are encouraged to useany free modules they find on the internet. However, every module must be documentedand cited correctly for good engineering ethics. Students may use modules developed byother students in previous semesters as long as proper documentation is included.Since previous laboratory work is available to next semester students, the
-learning) program. Thiscourse spanned the winter and summer semesters and included language preparation, culturalimmersion and appropriate technology readings and a six to sixteen week summer service-learning experience doing technical or engineering related work in a developing country. Theoverall goals of this course were to provide undergraduate engineering students with anopportunity to prepare for, choose and then participate in an international technical serviceplacement to enable them to experience another culture, apply the knowledge gained in othercourses to solve unique engineering problems, gain a greater understanding of appropriatetechnology and contemporary issues related to global development, engineering ethics, programmanagement
knowledge about the roles of engineers, the engineering method,ethics, teamwork, and detailed information about each of the engineering majors offered in theCollege of Engineering (CoE) of the host institution. The course is offered as part of a largerinitiative seeking to improve success indicators among low-income students. This paperprovides details about the course structure, implementation context, metrics, and resultsmeasured via descriptive statistics among participant students. The results of a longitudinalimplementation, suggest that early provision of career information and awareness can impactthe engineering retention and persistence of students and their interest in their chosen majors,particularly in educational settings where students
,supplementary learning, over reliance concerns, ethical concerns, detachment from traditionallearning, and lack of critical thinking development. The evolution from GPT from version 3.0, to3.5, to 4.0, which involves a significant improvement in language processing capabilities andscope of knowledge resulting in more nuanced context-awareness, including text and imageprompts, will also be considered in this study. By drawing from student assignment samples,class discussions, and user feedback, a comprehensive overview of the challenges, benefits, andthe pedagogical implications of ChatGPT in this first-year course will also be discussed. As theChatGPT technology evolves, a balanced approach that harnesses the potential of this technologywhile
research experience withthe International Building Code (IBC) wind load provisions, analysis of existing structuresfor wind loads, determining shortcomings (if any) of the analyzed structures, and designingupgrades and retrofits for the structures for complying with the building code provisions.Potential ethical issues arising out of deliberately or negligently using faulty design, inferiormaterial selection and/or sub-standard construction practice, and the effect of such practiceon wind integrity of structures were also covered.A total of 12 comprehensive classroom lectures were given to the participating teachers onthe RET project on Extreme Winds. A description of the various types of extreme winds andtheir effects on structures were shown
coaches must love what they do. This is often in the context of small ornonexistence monetary compensations, but even if compensated, good coaches communicate theirpassion for the game. This is also true when an instructor is coordinating PBL. PBL often requires extrawork and coordination when dealing with students in such an intense activity. The instructor of thisengineering design course often communicates the love for the teaching profession and the joy in thesuccess of the students. This kind of passion is contagious to students.Ethical BehaviorCoaches must model ethical behavior on and off the court. Good coaches reward good attitudes byathletes and would never want to win if it includes any unethical behavior. This is true in
, diversity, equity, and inclusion, Asian American Studies, Critical Mixed Race Studies, engineering ethics, and pop culture.Dr. Qin Zhu, Virginia Tech Dr. Zhu is Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education and Affiliate Faculty in the Department of Science, Technology & Society and the Center for Human-Computer Interaction at Vir- ginia Tech. Dr. Zhu is also serving as Associate Editor for Science and Engineering Ethics, Associate Editor for Studies in Engineering Education, Editor for International Perspectives at the Online Ethics Center for Engineering and Science, and Executive Committee Member of the International Society for Ethics Across the Curriculum. Dr. Zhu’s research interests include
v) an engineering code of ethics to ethical dilemmas b) Solution of complex engineering problems in at least four specialty areas appropriate to civil engineering c) Conduct of experiments in at least two civil engineering contexts and reporting of results d) Explanation of: i) concepts and principles in project management and engineering economics ii) professional attitudes and responsibilities of a civil engineer, including licensure and safety 2) Faculty The program must demonstrate that faculty teaching courses that are primarily design in
– Attitudes 4. 2025 ME PedagogyThese boards were focused on the graduate of 2029 as this would be the first class that would beeducated at our university completely in the semester system. Then, two of the working groupmembers used a qualitative content approach to code these responses [10], [11]. Table 1displays the categories that emerged.Table 1. Results of initial Jamboard ideas about curriculum Page Category Example comments ME Graduate of Ethics Environmental ethics, legal system as related to 2029 – engineering decisions, robotics ethics Knowledge Overarching ways of Sustainable development, sociotechnical thinking
workshops onsuch topics as “developing leadership philosophy,” “cultural competency,” “leading,micromanaging, and mentoring,” and “ethics, pragmatism, and risk-taking,” among others.Members also engage in outreach projects and are provided with individualized assessments 2geared to the career and personal goals of each. Participation in the program provides myriadbenefits to members, including mentoring from industry representatives and UConn Engineeringleaders, resume building, exclusive JLLA-related grants and fellowships, faculty social hours(providing interdisciplinary networking), and a professional community through which memberscan make
—Criminal Justice a. CRIJ 1301: Intro to Crim Justice b. CRIJ 3316: Crime Investigation & Proof 4. Legal and Ethical Principles—Business a. INFS 3308: Bus Info Infra b. BLAW 333:7 Bus Law I c. Corporate and Ethical Principles—Business d. INFS 4312: E-Commerce Design (Elective) e. INFS 4330: Business Intelligence (Elective) f. INFS 4391: Information Security (Elective) g. INFS 4397: Health Computer Information Systems (Elective) Figure 2. Cyber Security Degree/Flow ChartFig. 2 shows the details of the degree. It has a total of 120 hours with 50 advanced hours (core,technical electives, and support courses). As we can see, the degree is a balanced
-based modeling of physical phenomena when the datais a combination of actual field measurements and data that is generated through mathematical equationslike Hybrid Models, and Physics-Informed Neural Network, based on AI-Ethics (Mohaghegh 2021), itbecomes clear that the developed AI-model is not based on reality of AI rather it includes assumptions,interpretations, simplifications, preconceived notions, and biases.In this study, authors do not intend to explain the architecture or mathematics of neural networks as theycan be found in depth in several articles. However, it is intended to show a workflow that honors theoriginal definitions of AI&ML and follows AI-Ethics by not including assumptions, interpretations,simplifications
presentation slides completed bystudent groups within the three eligible chemical engineering sections. We measured studentachievement of three learning outcomes, referred to as Criterion 1, 2, and 3, by customizing arubric previously developed for evaluating undergraduate research assignments [16]. Criterion 1,“Evaluate Information Sources Critically,” measures students’ ability to select a variety ofappropriate information sources as part of their projects. Criterion 2, “Use InformationEffectively,” measures students’ ability to synthesize multiple information sources within theirpresentations, as well as their use of in-text citations to bolster their claims with evidence.Criterion 3, “Use Information Ethically,” measures students’ ability to
education through teaching methods, policies, and culture change.Dr. Andrew O. Brightman, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Andrew O. Brightman serves as Assistant Head for Academic Affairs and Associate Professor of Engi- neering Practice in the Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering. His research background is in cellular biochemistry, tissue engineering, and engineering ethics. He is committed to developing effective ped- agogies for ethical reasoning and engineering design and for increasing the diversity and inclusion of engineering education.Prof. Patrice Marie Buzzanell, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Patrice M. Buzzanell is Professor and Chair of the Department of Communication at the
the course as a technical elective towards my degree, but not seeking a BME minor 4. If your major is NOT Biomedical Engineering, please state your primary major. If your major is Biomedical Engineering, please type “N/A”. (Free response) 5. At the end of this course, how do I rate my ability to: a. Define complex biomedical engineering problems and their critical features. i. Poor, Fair, Good, Excellent, N/A b. Develop and evaluate hypotheses framing complex biomedical engineering problems. i. Poor, Fair, Good, Excellent, N/A c. Identify appropriate safety and ethical issues relevant to biomedical engineering problems
biases, to have accurate understandings of other cultural world views, and to display attitudes of curiosity, openness, and empathy; 6. To recognize ethical issues when presented in a complex, multilayered (grey) context, to analyze cross-relationships among the issues, and to evaluate ethical perspectives and concepts, including his or her own.These six essential learning outcomes and student objectives are a subset from the LEAPInitiative (Liberal Education and America’s Promise) on General Education developed by theAssociation of American Colleges and Universities [2]. The specifics of the entire Strand ModelGeneral Education are beyond the scope of this paper. However, all strands begin with aFreshman Seminar and
public policy and appreciative of the sustainabilityof projects. A summary of the attributes of the ideal engineering that resulted from the brain-storming session follows: Ability to communicate orally and in written form in a manner appropriate for the in- tended audience. Understanding of local government operations and decision making– planning, engi- neering, financing, politics, procurement, education of public, etc. Ability to evaluate projects from a holistic perspective – environmental, ethical, aes- thetic, political, historical, social impact, technical needs, costs. Awareness of sustainability issues of projects. Ability to use engineering judgment - evaluation of reasonableness of answers