Doing L Listening to instructor/taking notes, etc. AnQ Student answering a question posed by the instructor with the rest of the class listening SQ Student asks a question WC Engaged in whole class discussion by offering explanations, opinion, judgment, etc Ind Individual thinking/problem solving. CG Discuss clicker question in groups of 2 or more students WG Working in groups on worksheet activity OG Other assigned group activity, such as responding to instructor question Prd Making a prediction about the outcome of demo or experiment SP Presentation by student(s) TQ Test or quiz W Waiting O Other – explain in comments Instructor is Doing Lec Lecturing RtW Real-time writing on board, doc. projector, etc
. This opens the door to thinking more broadly aboutoffering remote lab opportunities to students who may not have access to an in-person lab at theirinstitution. It’s possible to learn everything you need to without the brick and mortar type of labsthat we have grown accustomed to.References[1] Shivam, S., Wagoner, K., 2020, “How Well do Remote Labs Work? A Case study atPrinceton University” Physics Education arXiv:2008.04499 [physics.ed-ph][2] Sabancu, A., Sullivan, J., 2020, “A Project Based Online Experimentation Course,” 2020ASEE Annual Conference, Paper ID 30635[3] Starks, J., Hendrickson, F., Hadi, F., Traum, M. 2017, “Miniaturized Inexpensive Hands-OnFluid Mechanics Laboratory Kits for Remote Online Learning,” 2017 ASEE Annual Conference
educationresearch [13]. Figure 1 leverages this model to show how the engineering and labor theory ofchange fits into this study of engineering graduate students engaging in a strike. The modelconnects Mejia et al.’s critical consciousness model [17], which engages Freire’s principles ofcritical pedagogy [18], with Hassan’s model of learning-assessment interactions [19]. “Mejia etal.’s model is represented in the center of this model, showing relationships between theory,action, reflection, and concepts of scholarship, praxis, concientização, and liberation that resultfrom their overlap. Hassan’s model of learning-assessment interactions is overlaid, with theoverlap taking the form of reflection as an assessment method and action as a learning method”[13
project. The survey is included inthe appendix. This survey was given to both the traditional face-to-face section as well as the i e ec i a d a S de -test was performed to compare the results between sections.Table 2 shows the results for each question on this survey including the averages and p-valuesfrom a t-test. Question Online Mean Traditional P-value Mean 1 4.56 4.38 0.5053 2 4.56 4.08 0.1226 3 4.67 4.15 0.1032 4 4.56 4.31 0.4109
Engineering Education 2015 Annual Conference and Exhibition, Seattle, WA, June 14- 17, 2015.[5] R. L. Shapiro, E. O. Wisniewski, E. Kaeli, T. B. Cole, P. A. DiMilla, and R. Reisberg, “Role of gender and use of supplemental instruction in a required freshman chemistry course by engineering students on their course grades and subsequent academic success,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education 2016 Annual Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, LA, June 26-29 2016.[6] B. J. Priem, C. Ghio, H. Boyce, S. A. Morris, E. Kaeli, T. B. Cole, P. A. DiMilla, and R. Reisberg, “A longitudinal study of the effects of pre-college preparation and use of supplemental instruction during the first year on GPA and
vn ≈ vth = = 350 m s−1 (4) mArFor the electron density, we assumed the electrons to be an ideal gas at standard pressure and theaforementioned estimated temperature of 35 eV = 4.1 × 105 K. This corresponds to a numberdensity of 1.8 × 1022 m−3 . This was on a similar order of magnitude to electron densitiesdescribed in Goebel. 5The ionization rate could be determined only through empirical tables. We found one such tablepublished by Chung et al. 8 The closest temperature tabulated was 32 eV, with a correspondingionization rate of 3.112 × 10−14 m3 s−1 .With these values in place, the mean free path came out to λ = 630 nm. Given that this is muchsmaller than the
that 74% of students in L01 and 81%of students in L02/L03 participated in writing the makeup quizzes. Table 1: Quiz and Make Up Quiz Results for L01 (Mechanical Engineering Students) Quiz 1 Quiz 2 Quiz 3* Quiz 4 Quiz 5 Quiz 6 Kinematics Relative Kinetics Kinematic Kinetics Impulse and Subject Tested of Particles- motion of of s of rigid of rigid momentum Curvilinear particles particles bodies bodies Overall Class Average, First
require to be proficient intechnological literacy? That is a central issue of this discussion.As a matter of policy in the 1980’s governments seem to have taken the view that it is amatter of the economic good that students should study technology in schools [15], and by1992 a World Council of Associations for Technology Education had been founded. Theconference proceedings associated with the founding of this organization, had the title“Technological Literacy, Competence and Innovation in Human Resource Development”[16].Yet, in this extensive report there are only two papers that mention technological literacy[17; 18]. Both authors are American; one, Michael Dyrenfurth is a member of ASEE. Hisdefinition was,“Technological literacy is a concept
development goals Plan (UN, 2018), The Santander(Colombia) Development Action Plan (Plan de Desarrollo Departamental 2016) and the Future ofJobs (World Economic Forum 2016). Also, various interviews with: government advisors, regionalentrepreneurs, and the Executive Director of the Cluster of Information Technology Industries ofSantander – Colombia, were considered as a reference in order to identify the challenge´s subject.Main findings related to work with experts is shown in Table 2. Interviews were held on a semi-struc-tured basis, and they lasted 1 hour on average. The questions included: (a) In the current context,what is your opinion regarding the competences of young engineers? Do they match the marketneeds? (b) As things are now, do you
author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF. The ideas we present here are part of a much larger thought process (Authors, 2021, in progress) in which we are thinking about the ways in which we use quantitative methods in engineering education, and how they might be better realigned or reformed to achieve the same diversity and equity outcomes we feel are more readily achieved by qualitative methods at the time. Our treatment and presentation of demographic data variables here represent a starting point. 1 The “doing” of engineering education is full of many delicate power
team and client. Other attitude(s): __________________Part 2. Click and drag the items below to rank them (1 = most dominant, 2 = next, etc.)I want to learn and grow expertise through the project.I want to work as a team in developing a design solution.I want to accomplish work that shows my abilities to others.It important to me that I fulfill my obligations to team and client.The attitude assessment is administered once at the beginning of the project and once at the endof the project. The initial distribution of attitudes and final distribution provides evidence ofstudent motivational attitude changes as affected by their project experiences.Behavior. The motivational behavior instrument is distributed second in the students
Colleges in the Evolving STEM Education Landscape: Summary of a Summit. S. Olson and J.B. Labov, Rapporteurs. Planning Committee on Evolving Relationships and Dynamics Between Two- and Four-Year Colleges, and Universities. Board on Higher Education and Workforce, Division on Policy and Global Affairs. Board on Life Sciences, Division on Earth and Life Studies. Board on Science Education, Teacher Advisory Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Engineering Education Program Office, National Academy of Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. California Community
Academy of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington D.C., USA: National Academic (2004).[5] Bruhn, Russel E. and Judy Camp. "Capstone Course Creates Useful Business Products and Corporate Ready Students." Inroads 36.2 (2004): 87-92. Online. 21 April 2012. .[6] Howe, S. and Wilbarger, J., 2005 National Survey of Engineering Capstone Design Courses. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, Chicago, IL, 2006.[7] Frank, M. P., & Amin, K. E., & Okoli, O. I., & Jung, S., & Van Engelen, R. A., & Shih, C. (2014, June),Expanding and Improving the Integration of Multidisciplinary Projects in a Capstone Senior Design Course
. Freeman S, Eddy SL, McDonough M, et al. Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science,Engineering, and Mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2014;111(23):8410-8415.8. Johnson D, Johnson R, Smith K. Cooperative Leraning Returns to College: What Evidence is there that it Works?Change. 1998;30(4):26-35.9. Bowen CW. A Quantitative Literature Review of Cooperative Learning Effects on High School and CollegeChemistry Achievement. Journal of Chemical Education. 2000;77(1):116.10. Alfieri L, Brooks PJ, Aldrich NJ, Tenenbaum HR. Does Discovery-Based Instruction Enhance Learning?Journal of Educational Psychology. 2011;103(1):1-18.11. Felder RM, Brent R. The ABC's of engineering education: ABET, bloom's taxonomy
significantly more time to explore programming and manufactur-ing. In addition, the student(s) should be able to implement assembly design modifications rela-tively quickly or test several designs during the course of the semester. The only fabricated com-ponent of this CNC machine is the modular block itself. All other components can be readilypurchased in bulk from a retailor thus reducing the cost for organizations that plan to use this inthe classroom. The remainder of this section discusses the design, development and manufactureof the modular block.The modular block (figure 3 a-f) is designed as a two-part symmetric clamshell. Each part iscomprised of an internal face (figure 3 a-c) and an external face (figure 3 d-f). The internal faceof the
-emphasizing social and economicpillars. Furthermore, most instruction on sustainability, as reported in the literature, appears tofocus on teaching the engineering student to be an engineer who practices sustainabledevelopment rather than a consumer who has a role in sustainable practice. In part, thisemphasis on the engineer's role in sustainability is a result of the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET)'s mandate that engineering undergraduates complete theirdegrees having achieved student outcome (c): “...an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability
J.A. Mejia, “Conversations about diversity: Institutional barriers for underrepresented engineering students,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 211-218, 2016.[6] D. MacPhee, S. Farro and S. S. Canetto, “Academic self-efficacy and performance of underrepresented STEM majors: Gender, ethnic, and social class patterns,” Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 347-369, 2013.[7] T.J. Yosso, “Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth,” Race Ethnicity and Education, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 69-91, March 2005.[8] S.L. Dika and J.P. Martin, “Bridge to persistence: Interactions with educators as social capital for Latina
, attracting more domestic and foreign students. Li (2016) argues that Chineseengineering ethics faces a dual task: on the one hand, like developed countries, China’s rapidprogress in S&T research has raised critical ethical concerns centered on new technologies (suchas gene editing, artificial intelligence, etc.) that need to be confronted due to the domestic andinternational pressure; On the other hand, China is facing a complex transition from tradition tomodernity which is different from the Western experience. Neither the traditional ethical 3 principle such as Confucianism nor the Western ones is suitable for guiding Chinese engineers tothink
and finalize the document.Assessment HistoryThe assessment of proposals and reports has evolved significantly over the past two decades.During the first few years of the program, the proposals and reports were reviewed by the faculty Page 26.1747.3advisor alone. The advisor gave feedback to the team on areas to improve. The designcoordinator reviewed all proposals for consistency and major flaws. No rubric was available forassessment. Course grades were subjective and decided by the faculty advisor and the designcoordinator.In early 1990’s the engineering department faculty members developed a document with the helpof an English department
su at al rro nk er l un di ng s Figure 3: Interpretation of Midwest Floods Problem codesThe aggregate percentages of statements within the design detail and design context areas of thecoding scheme are shown in Table 5. Design detail refers to the
researchers at his/herschool and championing a set of research instruments to be used across schools. In this capacity,each principal co-investigator oversaw the development, training, data processing and dataanalysis related to their instrument(s) for all campuses. The Urban Private University served aschampion for structured interviews, the Large Public University for the ethnographic tools andengineering design tasks, the Suburban Private University for survey instruments, and theTechnical Public Institution for academic transcript information.Monthly conference calls and periodic face-to-face meetings facilitated the work of the APSleadership team
Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, & Institute of Medicine, Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006.8. National Research Council. National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996.9. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Science for all Americans, New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.10. Russell, S. H., & Hancock, M. P., Evaluation of the research experiences for teachers (ret) program: 2001-2006 (SRI Project P13392). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International, 2007, July.11. Averett, S