implementation of Engineering Criteria 2000 , two especially important criteria are: Criterion 2. Program Educational Objectives Each engineering program for which an institution seeks accreditation or reaccreditation must have in place (a) detailed published educational objectives that are consistent with the mission of the institution and these criteria (b) a process based on the needs of the program’s various constituencies in which the objectives are determined and periodically evaluated (c) a curriculum and process that ensures the achievement of these objectives (d) a system of ongoing evaluation that demonstrates achievement of these objectives and
tolerances becoming almost an afterthought.Although most engineering students are taught materials science as a fundamental science course,the curriculum downstream does not foster the incorporation of these principles into thesystematic selection of the most appropriate material for a certain shape and function, or thecriterion-based selection of the optimal manufacturing process. Tighter integration between theintroductory materials courses and the downstream design and manufacturing courses is just partof the solution. With the advances in materials and manufacturing technology, a plethora ofmaterials and processes has evolved. Undergraduate courses in design and manufacturing cannotprovide detailed coverage of all materials and processes, and
estimates as an importantand underutilized concept in K-12 education 2.Reference Points An understanding of the reasonableness of estimates is an invaluable metacognitive toolwhen a student is attempting to generate his or her own original estimates. Such understandingis referred to in the present work as a knowledge component (KC) and this is certainly amultifaceted one, referred to in related literature as an integrative KC 11, meaning one that iscomposed of smaller KCs. In order to assess the reasonableness of an estimate, it helps to havean understanding of related values. For example, for a student to estimate the dimensions of hisor her gas tank, it may be helpful for that student to think of related volume measures that mightbe more
curriculum that is responsive and respectful [41]. One aimof the writing examples to be described is to do just that.The sections that follow will help to connect the dots between the use of writing activities in twodifferent introductory physics classes and their use in enhancing their respective learningcommunities. First, an overview of the two introductory courses and the student populationsthey serve will be shared. Some additional techniques used at the beginning of the term in eachclass will also be shared as they help to set the stage for the writing activities; and, to help createa respectful and inclusive learning community starting on the very first day of class.Overview of Physics Classes and Their Student Clientele Pre-CovidTwo
for Engineering Education, 2021 Paper ID #33551Dr. Luciana R. Barroso, Texas A&M University Luciana R. Barroso, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor of Structural Engineering in the Department of Civil Engineering, in the Dwight Look College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. Luciana has been with Texas A&M University since 1999, and in that time has taught multiple different courses ranging from the freshman to graduate levels. She has been active in academic program and curriculum devel- opment from the department level to the university level, where she served as co-chair of the Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP
-5) engineering curriculum that has been completely imbedded into all grade levels at DL Jamerson Elementary, an 800 student public school in St. Petersburg, Florida. He is also the co-author of several ASEE Conference Proceeding papers.Marie A. Boyette, FLATE Marie Boyette is the Associate Director of FLATE at Hillsborough Community College. Her B.A. in Communication, M.A. in Adult Education, and Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction, Adult Educa- tion/Measurement and Research are from the University of South Florida. Her research interests are in STEM curriculum development and student outcomes as well as in career and technical education and training
). 1 Fall 2024 ASEE Middle Atlantic Section ConferenceDespite these technological breakthroughs, many undergraduate thermal system design courses still focusprimarily on basic heat transfer and classical benchmark problems. This mismatch between what is taught,and the emerging technologies, highlights the need for curriculum updates. In addition, students often lackhands-on design experience and accessibility to commercial-grade thermal design software tools that enablethem to tackle complex, real-world problems. These skills are vital as students transition into theirprofessional careers.This paper proposes an improvement to an existing thermal system design course taught in the departmentof mechanical engineering
of the Latin American and Caribbean Consortium of Engineering Institutions (LACCEI). In LACCEI 2010, our students were selected as the recipients of 2 nd and 3rd place achievements award of the LACCEI poster competition.Internship programs and industry involvementInternship program is a key part of an engineering curriculum to prepare students for the workplace. Forpast several years, our students were involved with both summer and during-year internship programswith top engineering companies such as Sikorsky, Northrop Grumman Corporation, Lockheed Martin,RCM-Tech, Rockwell Collins, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and MTA. In summer 2011, twoof our Mechatronics Engineering students participated in a NASA internship program at
fosters an inclusive, supportive educational environment designed toretain diverse talent in mechanical engineering.Introduction:Retention and recruitment remain pivotal challenges within engineering education, particularly inmechanical engineering, which often experiences lower retention rates than other engineeringdisciplines. The demanding curriculum requires mastery of core subjects, especiallymathematics, chemistry, and physics, within the first year, and early academic success in thesesubjects is strongly correlated with long-term retention and degree completion [1], [2].Misplacement into inappropriate courses can impede student progress, undermining bothacademic outcomes and persistence.Mechanical engineering programs typically rely on
ABET assessment purposes. Specifically, we consider the question:To what degree can MEAs and E-MEAs impact the professional skills? Page 22.836.3MethodologyWe have conducted a series of experiments in the industrial engineering curriculum at a largepublic university. First, in the fall of 2009, two sections of an introductory EngineeringEconomy course were taught by the same instructor. The instructor incorporated three E-MEAsthroughout the semester in one section that consisted primarily of industrial engineering studentsand had a total enrollment of 49 students (experimental group). The second section consistedprimarily of civil engineering
offers a Masterof Science degree in Cybersecurity and Information Assurance (MS-CSIA). Hands-on labs are acore component of the MS-CSIA curriculum. Providing students with labs that utilize theapplication tools and techniques used by industry can be expensive. The MS-CSIA programdeveloped a set of labs utilizing the open source Network Security Monitoring tool SecurityOnion along with publicly available network traffic captures with malware to create a set ofchallenging and realistic labs.Security OnionSecurity Onion is an open source Network Security Monitoring (NSM) suite of applications usedto provide full context and visibility into network traffic[1]. Network Security Monitoring isbased on the collection, analysis, and escalation of
of Faculty Development and is held once each year prior to the fall term. The goals ofthe program are to provide a comprehensive orientation to the institution and the teaching andresearch goals of AFIT. The orientation provides information regarding institutional resources aswell as support and guidance to help integrate and acclimate new faculty. Barlow and Antoniou[2] propose “ensuring that new staff have access to the information and facilities they need fromthe start in order to reduce frustration and enable them to develop confidence and begin to feel incontrol from an early stage” helps to acclimate new “lecturing staff” into the Institute and theirroles.The orientation is designed to also foster a sense of competence, collegiality
Engineering Education, Shuman is the Founding Editor of Advances in Engineering Education. He has published widely in engineering education literature, and is co-author of Engineering Ethics: Balancing Cost, Schedule and Risk - Lessons Learned from the Space Shuttle (Cambridge University Press). He received his Ph.D. from the Johns Hopkins University in Operations Research and a B.S.E.E. from the University of Cincinnati. Dr. Shuman is an ASEE Fellow.Dr. Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh Dr. Mary Besterfield-Sacre is the Nickolas A. DeCecco Professor in Industrial Engineering at the Uni- versity of Pittsburgh. She is the Director for the Engineering Education Research Center (EERC) in the Swanson
artificialintelligence and technology. Given these impacts on society and considering that computing andengineering continue to merge as advanced technologies are developed, a need has beenestablished for ethical reasoning in technical curricula [3- 6]. Previous work presented acollaborative lesson plan that integrated science fiction and principles of ethical engineeringdesign in an introductory engineering computing course [7], which could be used and adapted byengineering and computer science faculty.Given established needs to diversify the technical and engineering workforce as well asinitiatives to mitigate biases in algorithms and technology, the need for diversity, equity, andinclusion in computing education [8 - 9] and engineering education [10,11] have
science courses and their mathematics level was at algebra 1 orlower. It would be years before these underprepared undergraduates would be eligible to taketheir first introduction to engineering course. The lack of academic preparation for theseincoming first-year engineering students presented a formidable problem.We searched for a solution where we could connect directly with the K-12 students. It had toresult in the K-12 students being motivated to complete chemistry, physics, and trigonometry inhigh school. It had to develop the self-efficacy required to continue to pursue a challengingSTEM curriculum. At the university, we had to find a way for Alaska Native and AmericanIndian students to survive and then excel. We needed to develop an
issues is an integral partof the implementation of the methodology. Implementing a more complete application of Kolb’slearning cycle by adding active learning exercises to the traditional lecture format was themotivation for the new exercises. LEARNING OBJECTIVES FOR ACTIVE LEARNING EXERCISES Fortunately, the four-quarter credit hour SPC course in the IME department at OSU consistedof one, two-hour laboratory in addition to three, one-hour lectures. The two-hour laboratory wasnot well utilized. The exercises were not synchronized with the lecture and students workedindividually to complete assigned exercises. The laboratory time was completely restructured tolink directly with the lecture material. The active learning format
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationStudents start by taking an intensive course in applications of computers to engineering. In thiscourse they learn how to use the computer to solve engineering problems. The course involves aproject selected by the student, combining computer languages, databases, data acquisition, andspreadsheets.Computer modeling is an integral part of the program. Students start with a visualization courseand two courses in computer-aided design, followed by a course in 3-D modeling. These coursesinclude the most common CADD software packages: MicroStation, AutoCAD, and 3D Studio1.The latest version of software is always used in these courses.There are two courses in structural analysis, the first one
Engineering Studies, and Executive Committee Member of the International Society for Ethics Across the Curriculum. Dr. Zhu’s research interests include global and international engineering education, engineering ethics, engineering cultures, and ethics and policy of computing technologies and robotics.Dr. Scott Streiner, University of Pittsburgh Scott Streiner is an Assistant Professor in the Industrial Engineering Department, teaches in the First-Year Engineering Program and works in the Engineering Education Research Center (EERC) in the Swanson School of Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. Scott has received funding through NSF to conduct research on the impact of game-based learning on the development of
A&M University. His research interests include integration of supply chain management with new product development decisions, distributor service portfolio optimization, pricing optimization, supply chain risk analysis, lean and six sigma, and large scale optimization. He has authored 30 refereed articles in leading supply chain and operations management journals, and 35 peer reviewed conference proceedings articles in these areas. He has B.S. in ME, and both M.S. and Ph.D. in IE. He is a member of ASEE, INFORMS, and a senior member of IIE.Dr. Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University Dr. Michael D. Johnson is an associate professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and In- dustrial Distribution
, especially in thefield of industry 4.0, but it has been applied also to other industry fields such as healthcare andconstruction [1-3]. The concept expresses the blending of virtual and real worlds to predictsystems behaviors based on data driven virtual products and verification [1], [4]. Programming isan important part of the digital twin concept [5].In fact, programming has becoming more relevant in our lives as we live in an immersive digitalage and is often associated to algorithmic thinking, which is not only a skill related to computersbut becomes something more general that can be applied to other fields [6], [7].Often, the class curriculum stays behind, despite different initiatives are suggested forimplementation such as the USA initiative
2015.1,2 Research and development in nanotechnology is likely to changecompletely the design, analysis, and manufacturing for a wide range of engineering products.Nanotechnology, however, is still mostly a topic for graduate schools whereas undergraduateprograms that focus on nanotechnology remain sporadic.3 Our NSF-NUE award will builda multidisciplinary, cross-campus educational program that integrates nanotechnology to theundergraduate curricula in science and engineering. Our educational program in nanotechnologywill also reach out to high school (K9-K12) and graduate students.In the development of an educational program for introducing nanotechnology to undergraduate(UG) students majoring in STEM at the New Jersey Institute of Technology
Paper ID #13280Engineering Rome: Assessing Outcomes from a Study Abroad Program De-signed to Overcome Barriers to ParticipationDr. Steve Muench P.E., University of Washington Steve Muench is an Associate Professor in the University of Washington’s Department of Civil and Envi- ronmental Engineering. His interests include sustainability, construction, roads, pavements, web tools and education. He is a licensed professional engineer in Washington State. Before his academic career, Steve spent 2 years as a transportation design engineer and 7 years as a U.S. Navy submarine officer. Steve lives in Seattle but likes neither
Session #: 3249 GIS and Undergraduate Engineering Recruitment, An Exploratory Study at DeVry University, Pomona. Alan Price DeVry University, Pomona, CA.AbstractEnrollment in undergraduate engineering programs in the United States (U.S.) has declined overthe past two decades. Studies have shown that the number of bachelor’s graduates inengineering has declined since 1985, while the number of ABET accredited engineeringprograms has increased by approximately one-third during the same time period. This suggestsgreater competition among new and old
Curriculum Committee. He has developed and taught the microprocessor designcourse since the middle 1970’s. He is working on an NSF CRCD grant on real-time embedded systems. Dr. Lenhertedits the IEEE Test Technology Technical Council Newsletter for IEEE Design and Test of Computers.ANDREW RYSAndrew Rys is Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Kansas State University. He serves as Chair ofthe Electrical Engineering Curriculum Committee. Dr. Rys has been teaching courses in electronics, optoelectronics,integrated circuit design, and solid-state electronic devices. His current research interests are mainly concerned withelectrical characterization of wide bandgap semiconductors. Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering
systems engineering concepts through experiential learning opportunities. • Provide multidisciplinary design opportunities in interesting and challenging areas. • Design, build, and test subsystems that are integrated into a larger project. • Ensure that the EAC/ABET EC2000 design, multidisciplinary teamwork, and communication outcomes are satisfied.This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes the large-scale systems engineeringprojects either completed or still under development at the University of North Dakota, utilizinga student labor force comprised primarily of electrical and mechanical engineering students.Seven brief case studies are presented in Section 2, with an analysis of their sustainability andscalability
-based course supplement to the complete delivery of courses online. The choices that facultymay consider range from simply posting a syllabus to creating web-based content to enhanceclassroom instruction to full online delivery. While the primary focus of web-based delivery has been in the development of standaloneweb-based distance education courses, more faculty are beginning to use the web to supplementand enhance classroom instruction, creating “hybrid courses.” The authors have chosen to supplement a traditional face-to-face on-campus CNC (ComputerNumerical Control) course with an online component. WebCT-based CNC materials weredeveloped in Spring 2002 and started being implemented in Fall 2002. The materials arecurrently used in a
, project management,interpersonal skills, leadership, marketing skills, and life-long learning skills. While teamworkhas long been considered an integral part of a design program, not all universities, includingours, offer multidisciplinary courses or courses that expose students to “concurrent design work”methodology.1 The practice of these more recently recognized methodologies trains students toperform parallel and integrated tasks in the design process and to practice importantinterpersonal communication with colleagues in other disciplines.The second-year multidisciplinary engineering design course described in this paper broughtmultidisciplinary design education back to a The Petroleum Institute of Abu Dhabi, UAE.Although the original model
responsibility.Although this research focuses on an unwritten syllabus, some of these skills are listed in syllabithroughout engineering curriculum. For the most part, though, traditional engineering coursesfocus on learning objectives for the technical skills, with potentially only some of the soft skillsoutlined. The classic list of soft skills is found at careerbuilder.com (Lorenz8). This list startswith a strong work ethic and positive attitude, which are challenging to teach. The moreteachable skills include good communication skills, time management, problem solving skills,and teamwork skills. Shuman, et al9 have a long list of skills, but some of the top skills arelistening, decision making, problem solving, communication and time management
learning.Marion Usselman, Georgia Institute of Technology Marion Usselman, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Marion C. Usselman is a Senior Research Scientist at the Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics and Computing (CEISMC) at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Marion received her B.A. in biophysics from the University of California, San Diego, and her Ph.D. in biophysics from Johns Hopkins University. She focuses on K-12 educational reform, university-K-12 partnerships, and equity issues in education.Thomas Morley, Georgia Institute of Technology Thomas Morley, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Morley, is a CEISMC Professor of Mathematics at Georgia Tech
# within the object-oriented software developmentenvironment Visual Studio 2017. The software is organized in several subroutines, whichcomprise the numerical solution of the torsional pendulum’s equation of motion, the readoutand illustration of the results and the visualization of the motion of Pohl’s wheel.For the numerical integration of Equation (16) different numerical methods with varyingorders of the truncation error have been implemented. By default the fourth-order Runge-Kutta (RK4) method is offered, but the user can choose by mouse click the explicit Eulermethod, Heun’s method, or a second-order Runge-Kutta (RK2) method. Thus, different ordersof accuracy can be tested and compared for the same time step size, an additional benefitwhen