course at Seattle University, for two consecutive years. Laboratorycomponents in the course utilize the MRK+Line robotics kit, based on the DIGILENT chipKITPro MX4 development board, which uses a Microchip PIC32MX microcontroller, based on theMIPS architecture. Hardware and Software platforms used exclusively for the IoT projects willbe introduced in the following section.ImplementationIoT-based activities for the Embedded Systems course were planned and implemented for twoquarters; fall 2017 and fall 2018. This course is required for students pursuing a BS in ElectricalEngineering with a Computer Engineering Specialization at Seattle University, and an electivefor students in the Electrical Engineering program. The course is open to both
difficult to adequately evaluate these programs. In order to evaluate andassess new experiments and projects, prior to introducing them in our curriculum, we use summerprograms with different students to develop content and test learning objectives. We introduce thenew topics to a cohort of students of diverse cultural background from local and internationalstudents. Our methodology is similar for the curricular development of each program (Figure 1)and consists of four main and distinct stages: (1) planning and administrative preparation, (2)content development and small-scale testing, (3) deployment and daily student assessment, (4)reflections, modifications and adjustments for a final course implementation. [6
uncomfortable misconceptionthat learners are dependent, and in order to participate in a learning activity, they must assume adependent role [6]. This defensive stance can be exacerbated when the learners are faced withunfamiliar technology such as a distance education learning environment [7], [8]. Since adultsare self-directed, this misconception must be overcome by treating the adults with respect byenvironmental considerations such as comfortable and adult-appropriate learning spaces, as wellas behavioral considerations such as the instructor treating the learners as partners rather thandependent learners [6]. An active role in planning the learning experience and a criticalevaluation of what they need to learn also enables the learners to exercise
, and groundwaterresources”; explanations of how science and engineering practices are utilized to remedy thesechallenges; and discussion of evidence that this uneven distribution is “the result of past andcurrent geoscience processes.” The consortium sought to “design a method for monitoring andminimizing a human impact on the environment” using scientific principles based on theobjective MS-ESS 3-3 [11].This on-campus event was facilitated by the education leaders, Student Leadership Councils, andevaluation teams from CBBG, QESST, NEWT, and NCI-SW. Seven faculty members, fifteengraduate students, and one former RET intern collaborated in the planning process for theoutreach event. The identified NGSS performance expectations were shared with
with professional language challengeswere possible to explain within the first two weeks via email along. That situation greatly changedafter DTU students visited Purdue University and for the first time the students met face-to face.After the first 1.5-2 hour meeting many questions were answered and more detailed planning ofthe project was started. During that meeting at the SATT and the presentation of the large enginetest cell, the DTU students were able to understand Purdue students’ expectation for the project.Next, the very important step was to explain to the Purdue students what kind of competenciesDTU students have and the possibilities they have to solve their problems. The whole project isvery complex and can be divided into several
. Teams build as many vehiclesas possible during the build period. The sale price of a completed vehicle varies in time,monotonically decreasing to a point where it is not profitable by the end of the simulation period.This reflects the effect of commoditization in mass markets [21]. Additionally, quality defectsresult in an additional financial penalty. Figure 7. Sport vehicle variant. Figure 8. Utility (left) and family (right) variants without intentionally planned commonality. Figure 9. Redesigned sport, utility, and family variants with a common product platform.The second round represents a paradigm of production with variety where each team receivestwo additional product variants similar to
involves planning, modeling, simulation, building, andtesting prototypes.Success in an engineering career largely depends on a thorough understanding of engineeringdesign processes. Two of the key outcomes of engineering education are: to prepare engineeringstudents to identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems, and to apply engineeringdesign to produce solutions [1]. Traditional assessment methods including exams, quizzes, andhomework assignments are primarily designed to measure the effectiveness of engineeringcurriculum in skill development. However, having the skills alone does not ensure that studentswill be successful through the engineering program, as well as in their future careers. An importantelement of success is to
computed. This is accomplished bytrajectory planning. This profile needs to be defined in a way to avoid or reduce the mechanicalvibration and stress on components and actuators, as well as to reduce overshoot response andexcessive position error during motion. This is accomplished by electronic cams. The inversekinetic analysis, which includes masses, center-of-mass locations, and mass moments of inertia,is used to generate the required actuator torque / force for the motion profile, and results in aspeed / torque-force diagram on which to base actuator selection. The chosen actuator nowbecomes part of the system, and, with the updated system, a control system, with feedback andfeedforward control, is designed, which then results in a new speed
. other paths may lead to(ABET-2) finding the solution. Creating Value Capstone Milestones BenchmarkSolving Problems Not only develops a logical, Having selected from among Considers and rejects less Only a single approach is consistent plan to solve problem, alternatives, develops a acceptable approaches to considered and is used to(ABET-1/2) but recognizes consequences of logical, consistent plan to solving problem. solve
advisorThe second segment of the administered survey targeted the implementation of the IBIEE modelcomponents to recruit students. In this regard, two open-ended questions were utilized to inquireabout the disposition from the faculty advisor to proactively identify and recruit engineeringstudents into the research group. The questions posed on the survey were the following: 1. Prior to receiving an invitation to participate in research, did you have a good relationship with the instructor? 2. Did at any point prior to receiving an invitation to participate in research, did the instructor ask you about your short or long-term plans?In the process of performing undergraduate research, the faculty member serves as
and parallel concepts. Student progress against the planned timeline willallow us to obtain a measure of the student learning in simulation modeling and parallel programming. Wehope to complete these works by next year.CONCLUSIONIn this work, we parallelized the sampling step of the SMC algorithm and were able to achieve up to 25%speedup in the runtime when using a machine with 8 cores. Currently, the convenience of converting aserial program to parallel and availability of multicore machines makes it quite sensible that the firstapproach to make any algorithm efficient is to take advantage of parallel computing. In the future, we planto run experiments in multi-cluster machines. We also plan to consider modifying the algorithm so that itcan
dynamic viewing on footage instructor’s face experience 30 minutes of preparation No additional Time time to plan video No additional time; preparation time; face- Commitment content and learning face-to-face lecture to-face lecture was for Instructor objectives and 11-20 was recorded recorded
lost. It is not reasonable to expect the studentsto develop a new business idea and undertake the venture during just one semester. As such, thefocus should be on what the students learn, rather than what they produce. Shifting focus to theprocess instead of the output also affects what is graded, e.g. instead of grading the business plan,the process should be graded [5].The goal of this paper is to present pedagogical approaches to help with the above objectives. Thecase studies presented here have been designed with junior/senior electrical engineering studentsin mind, but can be applied to other disciplines or levels with proper modifications.Project ApproachThe pedagogical approaches proposed here are intended to help students achieve
. Level 1 entry modules introduce the students to the basics ofprototyping boards, their usages, coding, and understanding. Multiple sensors are introduced atthis level with full descriptions of the circuits, the voltage, amperage, and power requirements.Time is spent educating the students on deciphering the sensor datasheets. Level 2 modules(modules 4-5) involve less detailed instruction sets with references to Level 1 circuit diagrams,constraints and procedures. In level 2 modules students need to plan an experiment anddetermine the necessary procedure to complete the experiment and attain the learning objectivesof the module. The level 3 module (module 6) required the student to read technical specificationsheets for the sensors and actuators
Board, and c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Paper ID #28973Curling Club; and served on the Human Services Planning Council, United Way, Chamber of Commerce,and Capital Fund Drive Boards of Directors. Erdman has lectured on leadership topics at Penn State andRPI. He served as a recruiter (25 years) for GE and Lockheed Martin, on the Penn State College of Engi-neering Advisory Council, an Alumni Advisory Board, and as the President of the College of EngineeringAlumni Society. Affiliations include Fellow of ASME, member of ASEE, AIAA, the Penn State AlumniAssociation, Centre County Chapter Board of Directors
to being comprehensive, the search must betransparent and reproducible; it is common to have the search strategy for a systematic reviewundergo peer review by another librarian before searching is carried out. This emphasis onquality search has led to the adoption of a variety of librarian roles in the execution of asystematic review. A 2018 scoping review [19] identified eighteen roles filled by librarians insystematic reviews. In addition to the expected roles of searching, source selection, andevaluation, the authors also documented librarians acting in planning, question formulation andpeer review roles. The roles described are not mutually exclusive; often a librarian will take onseveral of these roles as part of a given systematic
assess how students feel about the course project experience, as well as whether thisteaching practice is effective and achieves the projected benefits. We acknowledge that theassessment data collected in this work are subjective data based upon students’ perceptions aboutthe project experience. Other assessment measures such as grades of exams would be moreobjective. We plan to include students’ grades in our future data collection and assessment.Assessment Data Collection:Each student who took EE210 in fall 2018 and fall 2019 was asked to respond to ten questionswith each question having five possible answers. Each answer was mapped to a numerical value,specifically, 1-strongly disagree, 2-disagree, 3- no opinion, 4-agree, 5-strongly agree.The
Office to keep WPSstudents engaged with WPI. For the HS students who complete WRAMP, they will also get $500towards any summer program at the university and may become a WPS Summer Scholar thatcan attend a summer program for free each year. In regards to WRAMP being a recruitmentstrategy for WPI, 8 out of the 13 WRAMP high school women that are old enough to apply tocollege did so (which is a 60% yield and surpasses national averages). Two of them wereadmitted, but did not enroll. One stated it was due to financial reasons. We are investigating howwe might provide more support for WRAMP and WPS high school students to be accepted toWPI. Many of the WRAMP participants have yet to graduate from high school and we plan totrack them if they apply to
initial solution concepts as well as to the final design. (FEAS) Feasibility Assessing and passing judgment on a possible or planned solution to the problem. (EVAL) Evaluation Comparing and contrasting two or more solutions to the problem on a particular dimension such as strength or cost. (DEC) Decision Selecting one idea or solution to the problem from among those considered. (COM) Communication Communicating elements of the design in writing, or with oral reports to parties. (OTH) Other None of the above codesTwo other variables included in
. This exposed our students tocollaborators among different fields, with their own terminology, goals, work methods andpractical approaches. Our paper reports on the initial experiment during the Fall 2019 term,involving two sections of an Artificial Intelligence class and one section of a Deep Learningclass. We are planning to continue this collaboration in the future.Keywords: Collaborative Learning, Interdisciplinary, Inter-Class teamwork 1. IntroductionStudents at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo (Cal Poly) are exposed topractical, hands-on educational activities throughout their course of studies, reflected by theuniversity’s “Learn by Doing” motto. In the Computer Science, Software Engineering andComputer
Associate Professor in the Department of Computer Graphics Technology at Purdue University in West Lafayette, IN. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020Design Activity Worksheets for Developing Research QuestionsAbstractDeveloping good research questions is a skill that develops over time and is often difficult forstudents. More often than not, it is up to the student to determine what to research. Where do Istart? What do I look for? Is this a good research question? These are just a few of the questionsstudents ask and should ask in the early stages of their research process. This work describes aprogressive plan for developing research questions using a series of four design activityworksheets to
potentialdesign solution and what they plan to build in order to test the questions. Mockups should bequickly fabricated using simple and readily-available materials. Students conduct user testingsessions to gain feedback on their mockups, which is used to further refine and evolve theirpotential solutions.Performance testing of key functional aspects of their designs help students to determinequantitative values (specifications) that will meet the identified needs. Performance testscombine engineering analysis and experimental testing to learn the range of values for eachparameter that will result in the design solution working as specified.Building a Working PrototypeStudents will have settled on an optimal design solution near the end of the term. A
et al., “Curriculum Guidelines for Graduate Degree Programs in Software Engineering,” ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2009.[4] A. Pyster et al., “Graduate Reference Curriculum for Systems Engineering (GRCSETM),” 2012.[5] US News, “The 10 Best Colleges for Engineering.” [Online]. Available: https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/engineering-doctorate. [Accessed: 17-Mar- 2018].[6] “The 10 Best Colleges for Engineering.” [Online]. Available: https://www.usnews.com/best- colleges/rankings/engineering-overall. [Accessed: 17-Mar-2018].[7] Stanford University, “Mathematics and Statistics Courses 2017-18 | Undergraduate Handbook.” [Online]. Available: https://ughb.stanford.edu/courses-and-planning/approved- courses/mathematics
course.IntroductionAs universities strive to graduate engineering students who can make an impact on society,engineering leadership programs have become more prominent. The National Academy ofEngineering [1] as well as various engineering professional societies highlight the importance ofleadership skills in engineering [2-6]. This trend is reinforced by the newly approved ABETCriteria for the 2019-20 review cycle that includes “the ability to function effectively on a teamwhose members together provide leadership … establish goals, plans tasks, and meet objectives”[7]. With these ABET changes come questions about how to assess leadership. Because theconversation among educators on developing leadership in engineering students is growing, thisresearch seeks to
redesigned to include active learning techniques but will not utilize the flippedmethodology in order to establish a proper baseline of student knowledge. IET 22400 - Produciton Planning and Control Course Assessment Tool – Instructor and Student Course Objective Assessment Semester: Spring 17 Instructor: Course Embedded Assessment of Student Performance Student Evaluation (% ) Supported Program Educational Outcome
written-oralcommunication were also the key components of that experience.In general, the transformation took three school years, starting from 2013 to 2016. Inthe 3 transformation rounds, it has established a practical framework to share withengineering educators. The goal of this case study is to illustrate how initial plan ofcapstone transformation containing only partial perspective has been challenged.Through various self-improvement mechanisms (illustrated in Figure 1), challengeshave been overcome and the capstone course gradually evolved towardcomprehension and optimization from 2013 to 2016.Figure 1: The evolution process (rounds 0-3) in Dynamic Control System capstone transformation from2013 to 2016 in the current case study. The
and issomething that should be addressed in future work before more conclusions can be drawn. Thisanalysis did show an increase in the target variance and a decrease in the rater variance similar tothe experimental group, but no direct comparison can be made until a larger control sample isanalyzed.LimitationsThere are some important limitations of this study that must be addressed. We are currentlyworking to obtain and analyze a larger control group to better understand the differences betweenthe control group and the experimental group. In addition, this particular control group only didtwo peer evaluations that we had access to rather than the three evaluations performed in theexperimental section. This was not the plan during the planning
the appendix.Alternate Labs vs. Traditional LabsTraditional Lab (Control Group)The traditional course plan for the Embedded Systems lab is a structured approach to designingand constructing a motor controller with a speed feedback control system. Each week, the students 2complete a lab assignment that involves implementing and familiarizing themselves with a newmodule within the microcontroller or constructing and interfacing a new circuit with the micro-controller. As the semester progresses, these individual assignments are combined to create a fullsystem. The final project consists of a DC motor, motor driver circuit, motor feedback circuit,push-button keypad, and STM32L100RC microcontroller
engineering projects. The PeugeotCenter, as an entity within the college, has completed over fifty humanitarian engineering projectsthrough its fourteen year lifespan. The partnership with the Peugeot Center provides theopportunity for students to work on real-world humanitarian projects that may be fullyimplemented at a later date by the Peugeot Center. The partnership with E4C provides facultywith human-centered tools and techniques used in the course as well as the five-step engineeringdesign process (Plan – Learn – Design – Realize – Sustain). Until this course, the five-stepengineering design process produced by E4C had not been utilized in a freshman engineeringcourse anywhere. Until fall 2017, the Introduction to Engineering course at Lipscomb
mathematics level they shouldbegin their studies with.Strong Student OutreachIn order to help first year students placed into either MATH108 or MATH110 better understandwhat their placement test means for their respective degree plans, our university spent a greatdeal of time and effort developing and implementing marketing strategies. On receipt of thestudent’s deposit, an electronic and regular mail outreach campaign was triggered informing thestudent about the placement test, how to register for it, if they did not already have advanceplacement or transfer credits. At open house events and admitted student day, advisors presentedthe importance of mathematics for STEM majors, the impact on graduation timeline and whatoptions are available to