graduating each year is shownin Figure 7. Over the four-year period presented, the graduation rate is fairly steady.Student Scholar DataAn additional source of data came from members of the STEM Scholars Program (SSP). Membersof the program were required to fill activity reports detailing their time use and academic progress(attendance, grades, etc.) The reports contained weekly data and were submitted monthly viaemail. In addition, students filled reports describing how they spent their stipend from grant. Themonthly data was complied, analyzed, translated to semester data, and reported to the S-STEMScholarship Reporting Site (www.s-stem.org).Key findings from the activity reports [5] include:• A common theme related to financial aspects of the
race and ethnicity, which best describes you? (select all that apply) American Indian or Alaska Native Asian or Asian-American Black or African-American Hispanic, Latino, Latina, or Latinx Middle Eastern or Northern African Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander White Another option not listed here (please specify) Prefer not to answerEnd of Block: DemographicsEnd of SurveyReferences[1] S. G. Krueger and L. Ward, “Assessing Textbook Costs at a Small College,” Va. Libr., vol. 64, no. 1, p. 4, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.21061/valib.v64i1.598.[2] S. Appedu, M. Elmquist, J. Wertzberger, and S. Birch, “Inequitable Impacts of Textbook Costs at a Small
, 2021. [Online].[17] M. Vijaylakshmi, P. Baligar, K. Mallibhat, S. M. Kavale, G. Joshi, and A. Shettar. “Transition from in-person learning to technology enhanced learning in engineering education: Faculty challenges,” Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education 2021 FIE conference, Lincoln, NE, USA, Oct. 13-16, 2021. [Online].[18] A. J. Martin, H. Nejad, S. Colmar, and G. A. Liem, G. A., “Adaptability: Conceptual and empirical perspectives on responses to change, novelty and uncertainty,” Aust. J. Guid. Couns., vol. 22, no. 1, 58–81, 2012. doi: 10.1017/jgc.2012.8.[19] R. E. Ployhart and P. D. Bliese, “Individual adaptability (I-ADAPT) theory: Conceptualizing the antecedents, consequences, and measurement
abroad for students’ personal, academic, and career goals. 3. Responsible parties shall communicate the importance of understanding the social, historical, political, economic, linguistic, cultural, and environmental context(s) for each program and location. Student Learning Objectives 1. Responsible parties shall evaluate student competencies and place students in language and other courses at their level. Responsible parties shall prepare participants to navigate the cultural transition and to engage in culturally relevant, ethical, and reciprocally beneficial activities in relation to the local context. 2. Responsible parties should encourage students to consider the social, cultural
learning introductory programming in higher education,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 77–90, May 2019. [3] K. Quille and S. Bergin, “CS1: How will they do? How can we help? A decade of research and practice,” Computer Science Education, vol. 29, no. 2-3, pp. 254–282, May 2019. [4] M. Hertz, “What do “CS1” and “CS2” mean? investigating differences in the early courses,” in ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE), Mar. 2010. [5] M. C. Parker, M. Guzdial, and S. Engleman, “Replication, validation, and use of a language independent CS1 knowledge assessment,” in ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER), Aug. 2016, pp. 93–101. [6] M. S. Kirkpatrick and C
international perspective,” J. Nanoparticle Res., vol. 21, no. 11, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11051-019-4638-7.[2] L. Wright, S. D. Eigenbrode, and T. A. Martin, “Architectures of adaptive integration in large collaborative projects,” vol. 20, no. 4, 2015.[3] B. Akbar, J. Brummet, S. Flores, A. Gordon, B. Gray, and J. Murday, “Global perspectives in convergence education,” J. Nanoparticle Res., vol. 21, p. 229, 2019.[4] S. Anwar, N. A. Bascou, M. Menekse, and A. Kardgar, “A systematic review of studies on educational robotics,” J. Pre-College Eng. Educ. Res., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 19–42, 2019, doi: 10.7771/2157-9288.1223.[5] I. M. Verner, D. Cuperman, and M. Reitman, “Exploring robot connectivity and
inclusive and diverse STEM community.7. References[1] M. Riojas, S. Lysecky, and J. Rozenblit, “Educational Technologies for Precollege Engineering Education,” IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 20–37, 2012, doi: 10.1109/TLT.2011.16.[2] N. Kerimbayev, N. Beisov, А. Kovtun, N. Nurym, and A. Akramova, “Robotics in the international educational space: Integration and the experience,” Educ Inf Technol (Dordr), vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 5835–5851, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10639-020-10257-6.[3] S. Anwar, N. A. Bascou, M. Menekse, and A. Kardgar, “A systematic review of studies on educational robotics,” Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, vol. 9, no. 2. Purdue University Press
Conference, 2008.[10] A. L. Campbell, I. Direito and M. Mokhithi, “Developing growth mindsets in engineering students: a systematic literature review of interventions”, European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 503-527, 2021, DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2021.1903835[11] A.J. Elliot, H.A. McGregor, and S. Gable, “Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: a mediational analysis,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 91, no. 3), pp. 549-563, 1999.[12] P. Hsieh, , J.R. Sullivan, and N.S. Guerra, “A closer look at college students:Self-efficacy and goal orientation,” Journal of Advanced Academics, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 454–476, 2007, DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.549[13] A. Vrugt
introducing a smalllottery-based compensation for survey participation. (These amendments to the survey protocolare subject to IRB approval.) Additionally, the 360 Coaching program will continue to seekfeedback from the 360 Coaches throughout the year and respond to these by considering andimplementing improvements.References[1] S. Tantum, S. T. Santillan, L. Temiquel-McMillian, and J. Ganley, “Work-in-Progress: 360 Coaching to support whole-student advising in the first-year,” presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Minneapolis, MN, June 26–29, 2022.[2] K. Bartimote-Aufflick, A. Bridgeman, R. Walker, M. Sharma, and L. Smith, “The study, evaluation, and improvement of university student self-efficacy,” Studies in Higher
-divided into specialty groups such as structural, electrical, fabrication, procurement, etc. Thestudents were fully engaged in every aspect of the project. Those with construction experiencetook on more of the installation tasks but still participated in student teams involving structuralanalysis and solar design optimization. Advanced tools were used such as ANSYSc (forstructural) and National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)’s open-source solar optimizationtools such as HOMER, along with analytical methodologies.The final system design was a 30,720-Watt grid-tie PV system with 96 solar panels, eachgenerating 320-watts arranged in 4 sub-arrays of 24 panels each, connected to 6 invertersconverting DC (Direct Current) solar power to 3-phase 208
and satisfaction. The formative evaluation helps determinewhether project goals were met and what hampered their implementation. A summative reviewassessed this program's impact on student's professional abilities for global employment. TheGlobal Perspective Inventory [20] and Engineering Global Preparedness Index were used tocreate a survey (e.g., the belief that one can make a difference through engineering problem-solving). The evaluator used a Likert scale to poll students before and after IRES. The surveytool examined research skills and global perspective inventory professional skills. Research Skill Development - Pre v/s Post Survey Peer review and publication process Report writing and poster presentation Result
&M University Victor Ugaz is the Carolyn S. & Tommie E. Lohman ’59 Professor in Engineering Education in the Artie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering at Texas A&M University. He joined the faculty in Jan- uary 2003. His research focuses broadly on harnessing the unique characteristics of transport and flow at the microscale, with specific interests in microfluidic flows (both single-phase and nanoparticle suspen- sions), microchip gel electrophoresis, PCR thermocycling in novel convective flow devices, and construc- tion of 3D vascular flow networks for biomedical applications. Ugaz earned B.S. and M.S. degrees in Aerospace Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin, and a Ph.D. in
Vanderbilt University.Dr. Kenneth W. Van Treuren, Baylor University KEN VAN TREUREN is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Baylor Univer- sity and serves as the Associate Dean in the School of Engineering and Computer Science. He received his B. S. in Aeronautical Engineering from the USAF Academy in 1977 and his M. S. in Engineering from Princeton University in 1978. He completed his DPhil in Engineering Sciences at the University of Oxford, United Kingdom in 1994. He then taught at the USAF Academy until his military retirement. At Baylor University since 1998, he teaches courses in fluid mechanics, energy systems, propulsion sys- tems, heat transfer, and aeronautics. Research interests include
graduate students to a flipped online format found that, whileaverage performance levels remained the same, there was an increase in performance dispersionover time.These studies show that the results of implementing a flipped classroom are varied. Whileperceptions tend to be positive, the change in learning levels varies from no effect toimprovement. In this regard, it is essential to consider the impact of various factors, includingstudent education levels (secondary, undergraduate, postgraduate), the number of studentsinvolved (a small group or a large course), and the design and appropriateness of the material(s),among others. Consequently, the results largely depend on the particularities of each situation.MethodologyThe methodology applied
Director of Qeexo Week 8 - 15 Term Project (& ML Contest) Providing technical seminar and remote Q&A ▪ Topic selection - presentation sessions by engineering staff of Qeexo in ▪ Hands-on project development technical areas such as SW Installation and ▪ Final presentation Issue Resolutions.Term Project Description(s)Class term projects requested students to search for and choose project topics which could applyembedded ML to solve the relevant engineering problem(s). Term projects included three mainparts: Part I – ML Project Planning/Framing, Part II – ML Project Implementation, and Part III –Report and Presentation. Along with the course schedule, the major project
Activities Druing the COVID-19 Pandemic. Advances in Engineering Education, 2020. 8(4).[7] Benabdallah, G., et al. Remote learners, home makers: How digital fabrication was taught online during a pandemic. in Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2021.[8] Boll, S., et al., Making, together, alone: Experiences from teaching a hardware-oriented course remotely. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 2020. 19(04): p. 35-41.[9] Galaleldin, M., et al., The impact of makerspaces on engineering education. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA), 2016.[10] Vossoughi, S., P.K. Hooper, and M. Escude, Making Through the Lens of Culture and Power: Toward
-x.[9] S. Yu and C. Levesque-Bristol, “A cross-classified path analysis of the self-determination theory model on the situational, individual and classroom levels in college education,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 61, no. March, p. 101857, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101857.[10] R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 54–67, 2000, doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.[11] H. J. Cho, C. Levesque-Bristol, and M. Yough, “How autonomy-supportive learning environments promote Asian international students’ academic adjustment: a self- determination theory perspective,” Learn. Environ. Res
College of Technology)Diana Samaroo Diana Samaroo is a Professor in the Chemistry Department at NYC College of Technology in Brooklyn, New York. She has experience in curricular and program development, as well as administration as the Chairperson of the Chemistry Department for numerous years. She has mentored undergraduates under the support of Emerging and Honors Scholars program, CUNY Service Corps, Louis-Stokes for Alliance Minority Participation (LS-AMP) and the Black Male Initiative programs. She serves as co-PI on several federal grants, which include NSF S-STEM and NSF HSI-IUSE grants. With a doctoral degree in Biochemistry, Dr. Samaroo’s research interests include drug discovery, therapeutics and
The Vertical Axis is Normalized to Gravity.cycle studied in VBL II. Next, they are introduced Accleration of Whole Body CG (from GRF)to the electromygraphic (EMG) 4signal, its electrical origin, and Acceleration (m/s^2) 3its frequency characteristics. A 2spreadsheet is supplied with the 1raw EMG signals gathered in agait lab for five leg muscles
, Capstone 2. Among other assignments, a midterm presentation and report serve aspractice and a chance to iterate towards the final products, which include an executive summary,an on-line juried presentation, an in-person poster-and-pitch day, and a final report.Feedback. It is well established that constructive feedback is enormously valuable, particularlyif certain conditions are met: It should come from a respected source, it needs to be relativelyimmediate, and it should be delivered with thoughtful clarity from a “more knowledgeable other”(Salalahi, 2019). Further, the recipient(s) ought to be in a receptive and ideally solution-orientedframe of mind (Stone & Heen, 2014). Throughout the capstone experience, teams benefit fromfeedback
. criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2020-2021/. [Accessed March 2021].[3] K. B. Demoret, ""Students Teaching Engineering- Making Products for Education" (card on Engineering Unleashed website)," May 2020. [Online]. Available: https://engineeringunleashed.com/card/1489.[4] C. Kunsch, A. Jitendra and S. Sood, "The effects of peer-mediated instruction in mathematics for students with learning problems: A research synthesis," Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1-12, 2007.[5] S. Briggs, "How Peer Teaching Improves Student Learning and 10 Ways to Encourage It," informED Open Colleges, 7 June 2013. [Online]. Available: https://www.opencolleges.edu.au/informed/features/peer-teaching
. Didion, N. L. Fortenberry, and E. Cady, Colloquy on Minority Males in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. 2012, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.[3] Y. E. Pearson, Inclusion, Diversity Now Factor Into Accreditation Standards. PE Magazine, 2019.[4] NSPE Adopts New Policy on Diversity. 2017: NSPE Today.[5] Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering Phase III: Voices on Women's Participation and Retention. 2017.[6] R. Reisberg, The University Experience: Retention to Degree, in ASEE-TUEE-WIE Discussion Starter. 2015, ASEE.[7] C. Corbett, and C. Hill, Solving the Equation: The Variables for Women's Success in Engineering and Computing. 2015: AAUW[8] L. L. Long III, T. S
. Chiou, “The effect of concept mapping on students’ learning achievements and interests,” Innov. Educ. Teach. Int., vol. 45, no. 4, p. 13, Nov. 2008, doi: 10.1080/14703290802377240.[5] A. McKim and R. McKendree, “Metacognition, systems thinking, and problem-solving ability in school-based agriculture, food, and natural resources education,” Adv. Agric. Dev., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 38–47, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.37433/aad.v1i1.21.[6] W. Valley, H. Wittman, N. Jordan, S. Ahmed, and R. Galt, “An emerging signature pedagogy for sustainable food systems education,” Renew. Agric. Food Syst., vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 467–480, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1017/S1742170517000199.[7] H. S. Dhindsa, Makarimi-Kasim, and O. Roger Anderson, “Constructivist-Visual
integration of this in the Laplace domain becomes Va/s.Omega represents Va(s) multiplied by the transfer function, and this equation can be solved to determinethe response to a step function (such as a flipped switch which allows current to flow). The graph shown in Figure 6 shows a system with a step input Va and a DC motor’s resultingoutput (omega). Eventually, omega becomes a constant as steady state operation is reached, but intransient responses it is a first order system. Figure 6: Voltage represents a step function, while omega is a DC Motor’s response to that step.Stove Types Figure 7: Gas (left) and electric (right) stoves Consider two different stove types – gas and electric – as shown in
advertising”. This might require a weekly email to the team managersto remind them of their specific duties and encourage them to guide the team in their roleswithout micromanaging specific roles.On the whole, the METE format has met and exceeded initial expectations for creating astructured environment where students can practice and improve their teamworking skills.References[1] ABET (2020). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2020-2021,https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2020-2021/#GC3, accessed Sept. 9, 2020.[2] S. Sangelkar, B. Mertz, A. Bernal, and P. Cunningham. “Benchmarking Teaming InstructionAcross a Curriculum”, in Proceedings of the ASEE 2019 Annual Conference
/183778/.[6] P. J. Fadde and P. Vu, “Blended Online Learning: Benefits, Challenges, and Misconceptions,” p. 14, 2014.[7] K. Duncan, A. Kenworthy, and R. McNamara, “The Effect of Synchronous and Asynchronous Participation on Students’ Performance in Online Accounting Courses,” Account. Educ., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 431–449, Aug. 2012, doi: 10.1080/09639284.2012.673387.[8] A. A. Skylar, “A Comparison of Asynchronous Online Text-Based Lectures and Synchronous Interactive Web Conferencing Lectures,” vol. 18, no. 2, p. 16, 2009.[9] S. Hrastinski, “Asycnhronous and synchronous e-learning.” 2008.[10] L. C. Yamagata-Lynch, “Blending online asynchronous and synchronous learning,” Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn., vol. 15, no. 2
/politics/2019/05/28/gop-lawmakers-extending- university-wisconsin-tuition-freeze/1227519001/ (accessed December 2020).[8] University of Wisconsin System Board of Regents. https://www.wisconsin.edu/regents/meetingmaterials/ (accessed December 2020). Note: the annual data for the previous year typically appears in the December meeting material for the Business and Finance Committee.[9] ASEE online profiles of Colleges. https://www.asee.org/papers-and- publications/publications/college-profiles#Online_Profiles (accessed December 2020).[10] University of Wisconsin-Madison Student Enrollment. https://uwmadison.app.box.com/s/d7901sp12wp0zxclyc9hpm2wrspfxf99/file/639595697 808 (accessed December 2020).[11
. What question(s) do you still have? 4. How can you incorporate what you learned in the zoom discussion in your report for the project?Then each student had to reply to at least two peers’ posts and do one of the following tasks: 1. Give ideas for how they can answer their question(s). 2. Share some feedback to their thoughts about their project.Finally, for one of the projects, the students completed peer reviews of each other’s reports. Eachstudent read, graded and gave feedback on two other reports. The purpose of the peer reviews wasto allow the students to learn about topics they did not choose and to learn from their colleagues’reflections and change sections.Mechanical Systems Design: Module 1 DescriptionTo date, one
assisted with laboratory experiments essential for accomplishing the curricularintervention described in this study.References[1] C. J. King, “Restructuring Engineering Education: Why, How And When?,” Journal ofEngineering Education, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 1–5, Jan. 2012.[2] J. Mendoza-Garcia, I. B. Ngambeki, L. J. Behbehani, D. Evangelou, S. C. Rao, and M. F.Cox, “Defining the Knowledge and Skills that Enable Engineers to Participate in Public Policy,”in Proceedings of the 119th American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) AnnualConference & Exposition, San Antonio TX, USA, June 10-13, Paper ID 4262, 2012.[3] N. Yesiller, J. L. Hanson, A. Sohn, S. Tjan, “Emissions of Trace Gases from Landfills,” inProceedings of the 19th International
the middle school classroom, teaching math and science, and consulting with nonprofits, museums, and summer programs.Mr. Eric Steven Hall, North Carolina State University Eric S. Hall Education: • PhD (Student), Education, North Carolina State University (Expected Graduation: 2023) • M.C.E., (Master of Civil Engineering), North Carolina State University, 2011 • M.A., Business, Web- ster University, 1992 • B.A., Mathematics, Syracuse University, 1983 • B.S., Aerospace Engineering, Syracuse University, 1983 Areas of Expertise: Exposure Science; Air Pollution Monitoring; Mercury (Hg) Air Pollution Analysis; Environmental Justice; Environmental Public Health Tracking; Ultraviolet Radiation; Sustainability; Sta