’ minds and the structure in the subject matter. Metaphors,examples, and demonstrations are the elements of the bridge,” (Mckeachie, 1994). LaterMcKeachie says “From the standpoint of theory, the activity of the student, the sensorimotornature of the experience, and the individualization of laboratory instruction should contributepositively to learning.”A note about the lectures required is appropriate; Many Machine Design texts leave one or bothof these labs’ subject areas out of their coverage. Last year, one of this paper’s authors surveyedthe coverage of torsion loads by six common Machine Design Texts. He rated only three of thesix as giving complete torsional coverage, one as giving inadequate partial coverage, and two astotally inadequate
Structural Mechanics Laboratory,” Computer Applications in Engineering Education, Vol. 4 (1), pp. 9-17, 1996.6. Bonwell, C.C., “Active Learning and Learning Styles,” Active Learning Workshops Conference, USAF Academy, Co, July, 1998.7. Boyer, E. L., “Assessing Scholarship,” ASEE Prism, Vol. 4, No. 7, pp. 22-26, Mar., 1995.8. Brereton, M. F., Greeno, J., Lewis, J., Linde, C., Leifer, L., “An Exploration of Engineering Learning,” Proceeding of the ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Albuquerque, NM, Sept., 1993.9. Brickell, J.L., Porter, D.B., Reynolds, M.F., Cosgrove, R.D., “Assigning Students to Groups for Engineering Design Projects: A Comparison of Five Methods”, Journal of Engineering Education, pp.259
through a transition in higher education for thecreative development and leadership of technology which is beyond the “technology is applied science” paradigm.12As Wulf, president of the National Academy of Engineering, has pointed out, “Engineering is not applied science”— nor are creative engineers applied engineering scientists. Wulf further noted that, “Science is analytic — it strivesto understand nature, what is. Engineering is synthetic — it strives to create what can be.”13Whereas, Bush recognized that the primary responsibility for scientific progress is dependent upon that small bodyof high caliber men and women in the research universities and in the government research laboratories, whounderstand the fundamental laws of nature and are
laboratory space, documenting assessment of faculty quality and performance, and contacting employers who hirestudents from more than one program. Programs were assigned responsibilities for establishing missions, goals andoutcomes, preparing a report of what was currently being done, assessing the content of each undergraduate courseprovided by their program, determining where they could measure their students performance with respect to thedefined outcomes and implementing the first round of assessment.3.2 Obtaining baseline data for programs to get current status relative to assessmentThe surveys developed to obtain baseline data have been described in some detail in section 2.3. These surveys needto be completed for all programs in the COE, but
laboratory projects in the middle years [27]–[29].Engineering teams offer a mode for interdisciplinarity and task delegation so students can finishlarge and complicated projects within the span of a course. What is not often taught, however,are the various skills necessary in the social processes that make teaming effective:communication, delegation, and conflict resolution, to name a few [30]–[32]. The socialcircumstances in which these skills become relevant can reveal hidden epistemologies that guidethe teaming process, especially when gender differences and dynamics are considered [21].Within engineering, these epistemologies are woven into the culture of engineering learningenvironments and often the engineering field itself [18]. Therefore, we
mechanical engineering from the University of Arizona and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in mechanical engineering from the University of California, Santa Barbara. He is currently an Assistant Professor of Teaching at the University of California, Irvine in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. Prior to joining UCI, he was a Senior Member of the Technical Staff at Sandia National Laboratories and an adjunct faculty member in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of New Mexico. His broad research interests include engineering education, as well as control and optimization of nonlinear and hybrid systems with applications to power and energy systems, multi-agent systems, robotics, and
in Ghana and Kenya. Her expertiseinforms national scientific policy as a member of President Biden’s Council of Advisors onScience and Technology. Moreover, Hammond is one of only 33 people to have been elected toall three National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine [57].A third symposium speaker was Rory Cooper, Assistant Vice Chancellor and DistinguishedProfessor of Rehabilitation Science and Technology at the University of Pittsburg (Pitt); as wellas Founding Director of the Human Engineering Research Laboratories [40, pp. 66–68], [58] andwheelchair-marathon champion. Having sustained an injury during his U.S. Army service,Cooper has utilized a wheelchair since, turning unexpected challenges into opportunities toinspire
teachers and students to create understanding through conceptual modeling. She has experience in creating professional learning experiences, designing coaching systems, and developing frameworks and lessons. Her research interests include STEM education, system thinking, conceptual modeling, and coaching.Dr. Nancy Ruzycki, University of Florida Dr. Nancy Ruzycki, is the Director of Undergraduate Laboratories and Faculty Lecturer within the Department of Materials Science and Engineering at the University of Florida Herbert Wetheim College of Engineering. Her focus is on developing curriculum ba ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Examining STEMM Mentorship within Student
, several faculties have devised different mechanisms for engaging studentsat the early stage of their entry into the STEM departments. This includes pairing new studentswith their senior college mates at the laboratories to create more directed mentorship and co-research opportunities [41], thus enabling the programs to adapt to the ever-changing WOCSTEM student interests [42], [43].3.0 TheoryIn 2012 Strayhorn conducted a study to explore the experiences of Black males engaged in Blackmale initiatives. The study yielded a sense of belonging framework. To understand therelationship between campus climate and STEM culture, we utilize Strayhorn's Sense ofBelonging framework (2012). The framework explores how the context of spaces can foster asense of
Stakeholder Engagement during Engineering Design,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 760-79, 2020.[6] M. Bennett, and H. Gadlin., “Collaboration and Team Science Field Guide.” [https://www.cancer.gov/about-nci/organization/crs/research-initiatives/team-science-field- guide/collaboration-team-science-guide.pdf], 2020[7] H. Lipmanowicz, and K. McCandless, The Surprising Power of Liberating Structures. Charleston, NC: Liberating Structures Press, 2013.[8] M. Bennett, R. Maraia, and H. Gadlin, “The ‘Welcome Letter’: A Useful Tool for Laboratories and Teams,” Journal of Translational Medicine and Epidemiology, vol. 2, no. 2, 2014.[9] D. Nicol, A. Thomson, and C. Breslin, “Rethinking Feedback Practices in Higher
. Her prior work experiences include product management, consulting, tutoring, marketing, and information technology.Rachel Eve Gail Swan, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Rachel Swan is an undergraduate student at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (ERAU). Since 2022 she has been an Undergraduate Research Assistant in the ERAU Wireless Devices and Electromagnetics Laboratory (WiDE Lab). She has also been an Undergraduate Research Assistant at the ERAU Biologically Inspired Design-for-Resilience (BID4R) Lab since 2023. Her research projects and interests include hardware security for RF applications and machine learning. She is a recipient of the ERAU’s 2023 Outstanding Electrical Engineering Undergraduate
MIL-HDBK-5 Program,” Battelle’s Columbus Laboratories, AFWAL-TR-84-1423, 1984.AppendicesA1. Interview Protocol DetailsTowards the beginning of the protocol, participants were presented with Figure 3. This was toclarify the context of data that was presented in the interview—presented values arise frommultiple independent specimens, rather than repeated measurements on a single specimen. Thiswas to ensure the possibility of real variability in the data, without directly naming the concept.Figure 3. Image used to describe the presented data: independent specimens, rather than repeatedmeasurements.Figure 4. Image used to illustrate the design scenario. This structure was described as being inuniaxial tension.Immediately prior to the “error
Education, Educational Research Methods, Multidisciplinary Engineering, Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies, and Systems Engineering Divisions. He also volunteers as a Program Evaluator for ABET accreditation in the EAC and ETAC. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Leveraging Innovation and Optimizing Nurturing in STEM:Engineering identities in low-income students across their first year of college (NSF S-STEM #2130022)Leveraging Innovation and Optimizing Nurturing in STEM (NSF S-STEM #2130022, knownlocally as LION STEM Scholars) is a program developed to serve low-income undergraduateEngineering students at Penn State Berks, a regional campus of the
Paper ID #41608Board 278: Faculty and Staff Ideas and Expectations for a Culture of Wellnessin EngineeringMs. Eileen Johnson, University of Michigan Eileen Johnson received her BS and MS in Bioengineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She previously worked in tissue engineering and genetic engineering throughout her education. She is currently pursuing her PhD in Biomedical Engineering at the University of Michigan. After teaching an online laboratory class, she became interested in engineering education research. Her current research interests are in engineering student mental health & wellness
undergraduate engineeringclasses (9 unique courses). ● MAE 30A Statics and Introduction to Dynamics ● MAE 30B Dynamics and vibrations ● MAE 131A Solid Mechanics I ● MAE 131B Solid Mechanics II ● MAE 107 Computational Methods in Engineering ● MAE 8 MATLAB Programming for Engineering Analysis ● ECE 35 Introduction to Analog Design ● ECE 65 Components and Circuits Laboratory ● ECE 101 Linear Systems Fundamentals ● ECE 144 LabVIEW Programming: Design and ApplicationsSample PopulationA total of 4020 undergraduate engineering students from MAE and ECE participated in oralexams. The classes range from first-year to junior level, with class enrollment size from n=26students to n=309 students. Students were asked for
business process improvement (solving business challenges with technology solutions). His research focus are in cyber executive management, expert crowdsourcing, and decision analytics. Brian is also the Deputy Vice President for Digital Engineering Programs at Parsons Corporation.Dr. Mihai Boicu, George Mason University Mihai Boicu, Ph.D., is Assistant Professor of Information Technology at George Mason University, Associate Director of the Learning Agents Center (http://lac.gmu.edu), Co-Director of IT Entrepreneurship Laboratory (http://lite.gmu.edu) and Co-Director of ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Considering Professional Diversity as a Factor in a
category of “Into Action” highlights the students ability to begin pressure testing a ventureidea, plan the way forward, and work/learn with others to create value. This final set ofcompetencies are what engineering design and laboratory team projects work towards. ABETstudent outcome #5 [an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provideleadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meetobjectives] directly points at these same ideas of putting engineering knowledge into action. Whileit can be hard to build this environment for undergraduate engineering teams, well-constructedproject based learning opportunities might accomplish this. However, these are usually
Engineering Dr. Cory J. Prust is a Professor in the Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department at Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE). He earned his BSEE degree from MSOE in 2001 and his Ph.D. from Purdue University in 2006. Prior to joining MSOE in 2009, he was a Technical Staff member at MIT Lincoln Laboratory. He teaches courses in the signal processing, communication systems, and embedded systems areas.Elizabeth Taylor, Milwaukee School of Engineering Elizabeth Taylor is the director of the STEM Center at Milwaukee School of Engineering where she directs institutional strategy for K-12 STEM programming and outreach and oversees the operations of the Center. She advocates for the alignment of
Paper ID #41514Use of Theories in Extended Reality Educational Studies: A Systematic LiteratureReviewDr. Kimia Moozeh, Queen’s University Kimia Moozeh is a research associate at Queen’s university in Engineering Education. Her PhD dissertation at University of Toronto explored improving the learning outcomes of undergraduate laboratories. Her research interests are lab-based learning, online learning and metacognition.Dr. Paul Cameron Hungler P.Eng., Dr. Paul Hungler is an assistant professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Ingenuity Labs at Queenˆa C™s University. Prior to starting his current position, Major
,” Asia-Pac. Educ. Res., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 375–394, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s40299-020-00525-x.[10] T. Gok and O. Gok, “Peer Instruction in chemistry education: Assessment of students’ learning strategies,” Learn. Strateg., vol. 17, no. 1, 2016.[11] M. F. Golde, C. L. McCreary, and R. Koeske, “Peer Instruction in the general chemistry laboratory: Assessment of student learning,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 83, no. 5, p. 804, May 2006, doi: 10.1021/ed083p804.[12] N. Lasry, E. Mazur, and J. Watkins, “Peer Instruction: From Harvard to the two-year college,” Am. J. Phys., vol. 76, no. 11, pp. 1066–1069, Nov. 2008, doi: 10.1119/1.2978182.[13] J. Schell and E. Mazur, “Flipping the chemistry classroom with Peer
2017, pp.1-12.[6] Promoting Active Learning https://utah.instructure.com/courses/148446/pages/active-learning, [Accessed February 25, 2016].[7] M. Prince, “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 93, 2004, pp. 223-231.[8] S. Luster-Teasley, S.C. Hargrove-Leak, and C. Waters, “NSF TUES: Transforming undergraduate environmental engineering laboratories for sustainable engineering using the case studies in the sciences instructional method” Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education, Indianapolis, IN, June 2014, 10.18260/1-2– 22873.[9] V., Jungic, H. Kaur, J. Mulholland, and C. Xin, “On flipping the classroom in large first-year
engineering education: A survey of trends and needs,” JOM, vol. 61, no. 10, p. 12, Oct. 2009, doi: 10.1007/s11837-009-0142-3.[3] K. Thornton and M. Asta, “Current status and outlook of computational materials science education in the US,” Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 13, no. 2, p. R53, 2005, doi: 10.1088/0965-0393/13/2/R01.[4] National Science and Technology Council, “Materials Genome Initiative Strategic Plan,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.mgi.gov/sites/default/files/documents/MGI-2021- Strategic-Plan.pdf[5] S. P. Brophy, A. J. Magana, and A. Strachan, “Lectures and Simulation Laboratories to Improve Learners’ Conceptual Understanding,” Adv. Eng. Educ., vol. 3, no. 3, 2013, Accessed: Nov. 04, 2018
study found that being able to test the use of the robotsin actual homes versus in a laboratory setting gave useful feedback, both in areas that needimprovement and in what ways people really used the robots to assist with their ADL. For those people with lower-limb mobility issues that use power wheelchairs, one issuefacing that needs to be addressed is charging the wheelchairs’ batteries. This activity sometimesrequires manual dexterity that the disabled person does not have. Work has been done to create awireless power transfer pad that a wheelchair could simply be parked on to charge it, rather thanrequiring the wheelchair to be plugged in. This technology would increase the self-reliance ofpowered wheelchair users and make it easier
school students participated in a week-long summer camp thatfocused on electrical and computer engineering (ECE) concepts and practices. The five-daysummer camp consisted of hands-on activities, tours of different laboratories in ECE disciplines,and a group project that spanned the whole week where students built circuits using theSparkFun Inventor’s kit. During the group activity, the students were organized into eightgroups, and each group was mentored by an undergraduate mentor who facilitated thecollaborative hands-on activities. The middle school students completed validated and reliablepre and post-surveys adapted from the Student Attitudes Toward STEM (S-STEM) Survey andthe Group Work Skills Questionnaire Manual. The S-STEM survey is
University DR. JEAN KAMPE is currently department chair of Engineering Fundamentals at Michigan Techno- logical University, where she holds an associate professorship in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering. She received her Ph.D. in metallurgical engineering from Michigan Tech, M.Ch.E. in chemical engineering from the University of Delaware, and a B.S. degree in chemical engineering from Michigan Tech. She was employed as a research engineer for five years at the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, DC, and she held an associate professorship in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, working there for ten years in first-year engineering