Premier. EBSCO. Web. 26 Dec. 2009.3. Imperatore, C. "What You Need to Know About Web 2.0." Techniques: Connecting Education & Careers 83.9 (2009): 20-23. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 23 Dec. 2009.4. Klein, K. "Demystifying Web 2.0." BusinessWeek Online (2008): 15. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 26 Dec. 2009.5. Junco, R., & Mastrodicasa, J. M. (2007). Connecting to the Net generation: What higher education professionals need to know about today's students.6. Peacock, M. (2008, May 30). Millenials drive mobile Web 2.0 technologies. CMSWire.com. Retrieved October 15, 2009, from http://www.cmswire.com/cms/enterprise-20/millenials-drive-mobile-web-20-technologies- 002719.php7. Williams
Teacher O of District B and the twenty-two students of Teacher M of DistrictA) were combined with survey results for two other groups of students who experienced similarprograms in two other towns and a report on the results of administering the survey to the fourgroups of students was completed by an outside evaluator in April 2009. That document, entitledAnnual Evaluation Report8, states that although the student attitudes were only measured witha post-survey, data based on a 4-point Likert scale were stronger on general performancecategories and lower on engineering career-related items. Page 15.1171.11 Table XIII
careers inengineering in part because this profession is perceived to lack a connection to helping improvethe world around them4. Although serving humanity is at the heart of the engineeringprofession5, the engineering education system and infrastructure (texts, learning aids, facultydevelopment) have largely lost this core connection. Sustainability education with its holisticnature of technology that is combined with human dimension will re-establish the sense of thisconnection. There is some indication that sustainability also contributes to the increase inrecruiting and retaining traditionally underrepresented groups in engineering6.Sustainability integration may be difficult for many college and university graduates of scienceand engineering
. At the beginning of the semester did you see yourself aligned as a humanist or technologist when considering solutions to water resources challenges? Do you feel your attitudes have changed such that you might align more or less with the other group? 2. Which topic/discussion provided you the greatest insight into the other group (humanist or technologist)? 3. As a result of this course, do you feel you better understand and can articulate the position of perspectives different than yours as they relate to water resources engineering projects? 4. List one concept outside of your disciplinary major that you learned in this course. Do you feel it will be helpful for you in your future career? How so? 5
To assist with time management Time management Mandatory Tutoring To help adjust to college life To help understand concepts Professional Development To be aware of opportunities related to your major Lack of broadcasted opportunities Plethora of opportunities To gain insight on what your career will entail To have practical opportunities to apply coursework Peer Support
environmental paradigm.‖ Journal of Environmental Education. 40(1): 19-28.7. Gross, M. 2007. You, too, can be green: The case for campus commitment and action, Community College Journal. 31: 463-474.8. Inglehart, R. 1990. Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.9. Jorgenson, H. 2006. A green campus culture in Wisconsin, Techniques Connecting Education and Careers. 81(4): 23-25.10. Kalkani, E., Boussiakou, I., and Boussiakou, L. 2004. Application of educational theories in restructuring an introductory course in renewable energy engineering, European Journal of Engineering Education. 29(3): 401-413.11. Keeney, R., von Winterfeldt, D., and Eppel, T. 1990. Eliciting
Poly is given every quarter to students finishing their senior project.The exam for each major is typically offered as three different versions each drawing over 50questions from the ever-expanding bank of test questions that cover virtually all of the programoutcome areas and skills. Students are not advised to prepare for the exam, but they are notifiedthat a portion (usually 10%) of their senior project grade will be affected by their performance onthe exam. Thereby, skipping the exam or purposefully answering incorrectly (e.g., to get finishedsooner) is discouraged. Since the content tested typically spans their educational career, a score of50% or better is considered minimally acceptable from a program assessment point of view. Such
_____ c. Humanitarian efforts _____ d. Group work, team building _____ e. Grades _____ 4. Do you think power electronics will play an important role in your engineering career? a. Extremely important b. Very important c. Important d. Slightly important e. Not very importantMost course are taught using problem sets for each separate topic. Imagine that you are taking acourse that instead teaches theory and assigns problem sets based around one specific applicationof the technology from the class. For example, a course on hydraulics that teaches theory usingthe Boeing 777
most benefit in terms of using the material later in their careers and so thesesomewhat esoteric topics were removed from the course. Based on one of the author’sexperience in teaching students at Montana State over the last eight years, and in following whatmany of the EE 433 students do after graduation, the most common tasks that align withpotential content for EE 433 include RF/microwave board layout, component selection, andcircuit-level and system-level calculations. It is interesting to note that not one student hasindicated that he/she is involved with distributed filter design. In place of the lectures devotedto the theory of distributed element filter design, time in lecture was opened for discussing thefundamentals of Doppler radar
to continue to learn throughout their careers. With experience, graduates should grow Page 15.1195.2professionally from the level of a junior team member to that of a leader with responsibility forthe broad scope of a technological project. Their job duties should progress from dealing withspecific problems as part of a broader project to managing the entire project where the personmust deal with social and economic as well as purely technical issues.While the initial job function may have the graduate performing basic tasks such as calculationsand analyses where someone else makes critical judgments based on these calculations, or
created at Washington State University (WSU) in 2006 under National Science funding(DGE 0538652). The program uses culturally-relevant engineering applications in mathematicsto energize graduate students, high school teachers and students, and university faculty to reformmathematics and science education and heighten engineering career aspirations. Teachers with WSU graduate student mentors facilitate pedagogically sound, student-centered, engineering projects in which high school students create engineering solutions to localsocially-important problems while achieving classroom objectives and state mathematics andscience standards. Diverse and geographically-distant students and teachers are connected toform learning communities to
Objectives: 1. Understanding connection between the scientific content and activity scaffolds and the story. 2. Attitudes displayed towards STEM professionals and careers. 3. Attitudes towards self‐expression. The students were asked to respond to the following prompts: 1. What I learned from doing the graphic novel 2. What I did /did not like about doing the graphic novel Response 1 2 3 Connections Did not report Reported learning Reported learning awareness of the scientific scientific concepts connection information but and making the between the
. For years, technology literacy has been a topic of instruction for our undergraduatestudents, but recently we have added a technology literacy course to our masters program.Students in our masters program come to us from a variety of disciplines and experience. Manyof these students are in-service teachers. The new course will help our graduate students whopursue teaching careers meet the need to increase content in this important area.Teacher Technological Survey DevelopmentIn preliminary work, the investigators closely worked with various NCETE (National Council ofEngineering Technology Education) committee members, with ITEA personnel, and with theBoston Museum of Science, in collaboration dealing with K-12 technological literacy
inengineering enrollment. Materials will allow students with different learning preferences to studyand solve problems at their own pace in “gateway” courses.)Enhancing Liberal Studies for Engineering Students (Goal: To better expose engineeringstudents to the humanities and social sciences by providing recommendations on how studentscan maximize elective credits to gain a comprehensive understanding of the social contexts ofengineering careers.)International Engineering Development (Goal: To provide leadership training for studentsparticipating in international projects, and in particular in countries where the Engineers WithoutBorders chapter is active.)Video-Enhanced Instructional Material for Statics (Goal: To help students better understandbasic
relative to grading is placed on submitting complete, correct, andneat homework in a timely fashion. Most FEP students find that achieving a high grade in GNEG1111 and GNEG 1121 is a result of beginning assignments in a timely fashion, diligentlyfollowing directions, and taking advantage of resources available for assistance. As such, theFEP faculty and staff consider the grades in GNEG 1111 and GNEG 1121 to be accuratemeasures of the students’ work ethic.The Introduction to Engineering course sequence also provides a forum for many activitiesrelated to CoE major selection, career development (resumes, interview skills, job searchstrategies, coops and internships, etc.), academic skills development (note taking, test preparationstrategies, etc
RatingSome of the more interesting or useful anecdotal comments included using a factory buildingpowered by water, changing the theme from semester to semester (which in fact is done),showing the development of some of the software used in the projects, and having a greater“connection between the background of each project and the theme, like a continuing budgetthroughout the term”.A very successful approach has been used to connect the five projects of thermal design coursesthrough the use of a theme. In addition to increasing students’ interest and enhancing theirlearning, the themes allow the introduction of engineering activities and careers that might not benormally covered in a mechanical engineering curriculum. More details concerning
processes, the ability to identify, analyze, andsolve technical problems, and a commitment to quality, timeliness, and continuousimprovement.In Manufacturing Engineering Technology, for example, the objective of an accreditablebaccalaureate degree program in manufacturing engineering technology will preparegraduates with the technical skills necessary to enter careers in process and systemsdesign, manufacturing operations, maintenance, technical sales or service functions in amanufacturing enterprise. Graduates, in this program, must demonstrate the ability toapply the technologies of materials, manufacturing processes, tooling, automation,production operations, maintenance, quality, industrial organization and management,and statistics to the
increase as the scientificunderstanding of the students increases through their undergraduate career. In addition tocontent changes, curriculum changes will use pedagogical innovations advocated by the NSF-funded Foundation Coalition (FC), one of eight engineering education coalitions:active/cooperative learning, technology-enabled learning and student teams. Further, theprincipal investigators will use the lessons about processes of curricular change gained from theFC experiences. As a result, many engineering students will become better acquainted with thepossibilities offered by nanotechnology, and some engineering students will gain an in-depthunderstanding of nanoscale manufacturing processes.The envisioned curricular change has four
Albany. Dr.Dean holds a Ph.D. from the University of Louisville in Clinical Psychology, a Master of Public Administrationfrom IUPUI, and a Master of Electrical Engineering from the University of Louisville. He is an ASQ CertifiedQuality Engineer and a Registrar Accreditation Board Certified ISO 9000 Quality System Auditor.DONNA EVANECKYDonna Evanecky started teaching as an assistant professor for Purdue University School of Technology in 2001after an eight-year career in quality management. She teaches Organizational Behavior, Managing Change,Leadership, Entrepreneurship, Occupational Health and Safety and Team Development for the Department ofOrganizational Leadership and Supervision at the Kokomo, Indiana campus.NATHAN HARTERHarter has been an
who wish to learn more about electronics without having to digest extensive theory and math. • Gets students building circuits from the start, with little theoretical introduction. • Lets students experience early in their careers the non-idealities of real-world engineering, and demonstrates the utility of simple rule-of-thumb design. • Appears to have students complete the subject with a positive impression of engineering as a field of study. • Can be readily taught by a graduate student or an advanced undergraduate, enabling large numbers of students to take the subject without taxing a limited (and over-worked) faculty and staff.Its weaknesses include that it: • Is somewhat more time consuming than
teaching effectiveness, consistent with accepted best practices inevaluation, and reliable, and does not impose undue time demands on the faculty. If it is part of amultiple-source assessment system of the type illustrated in Figure 1, it should provide anevaluation of teaching performance with a validity acceptable by any reasonable standard, butmore extensive testing will be required to confirm that hypothesis. The protocol also provides agood basis for formative evaluation, which if implemented in the first few years of a facultymember’s career should significantly increase the likelihood that a subsequent summative reviewwill be favorable.References 1. N. Van Note Chism, Peer Review of Teaching, Bolton, MA, Anker Publishing, 1999. 2. M
becomes a professionalengineer in industry. Why not expect the student to be a professional engineer during theiracademic career? Page 9.495.4 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education Session 2468Points Emphasized in a Symbolic Formulation The authors emphasize the following points when formulating a problem symbolically for in-class and out-of-class exercises:• Definition of Variables and their
they move through their program of studies. They continue tobuild their habits of mind skills as they move through their career path. These habits of mindhave students: 1. Employ a holistic perspective by accounting for the broader system within which the problem exists. Typically one extends the problem boundary to include actors and forces associated with both natural systems and those associated with social or cultural institutions or norms. 2. Take a long-term view of the problem by seeking to understand the history of its evolution and how things might unfold in the future, given the dynamic forces in play. 3. Know what kind of outside expertise is needed and when/where to get it from those who
tremendously to new theories, applications and technologies that are still considered emergingtechnologies and are not in a textbook or course notes. In this way we stimulated students further toseek research activities based on their personal or career interests through open-ended problem solving,interdisciplinary projects, offering them a great opportunity to “try-out” at a smaller scale a “capstonetype” projects. Students enriched constantly their knowledge and they proved critical thinking andcreativity. Some of the main drawbacks pointed out by the students include the fact that since thedevices are extremely small it is difficult at times for all students to directly work hands-on with theexperiment and hence it may be better suited for an
Career Assessment, 12(2), 135–149.24 Ohland, M. W., Yuhasz, A. G., & Sill, B. L. (2013). Identifying and removing a calculus prerequisite as abottleneck in Clemson’s General Engineering curriculum. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 253–257.25 Attewell, P. A., Lavin, D. E., Domina, T., & Levey, T. (2006). New evidence on college remediation. Journal ofHigher Education, 77(5), 886–924.26 Jaggars, S.S. & Stacey, G.W. (2014). What we know about developmental education outcomes. New York, NY:Columbia University, Teachers College, Community College Research Center.27 Bahr, P. R. (2008). Does mathematics remediation work?: A comparative analysis of academic attainment amongcommunity college students. Research in Higher
classsource code is shown in figure E4.These are just a few of the representative Biomedical Instrumentation, DSP using Javaprogramming, Image processing using MATLAB laboratory modules to which students getexposed.Feedback and AssessmentContinuous examining the evolving needs of our students and employers for career-oriented highereducation programs as basis for development of additional programs is our university mission andpurpose. Agencies accrediting our programs are also increasingly focused on student outcomes andachievement. Student outcomes are the skills and abilities students are expected to demonstrate atgraduation. One of the student outcomes in our program is the ability to conduct standard tests andmeasurements; to conduct, analyze
coming together to work on the projects. During the past threeyears, California State University Los Angeles faculty team worked collaboratively to developCPBL-beyond-Classroom pedagogy that has proved to be effective to enhance student learningon commuter campuses. As an extension to CPBL, a specific PBL model developed in theauthors’ previous work to address the retention issues of minority students in theirfreshman/sophomore year [5-7], CPBL-beyond-Classroom aims at preparing senior students forprofessional careers. To address the learning needs of students on commuter campuses, the newpedagogy emphasizes on virtual collaborative learning and community inquiry in a remotefashion. Iterative classroom implementation and assessment demonstrated
#1237868. Portions of this paper were orally presented at the SEACconference (2013), the Frontiers in Education conference (2013) and the National ScienceFoundation EESE PI meeting (2013). Attendees at each of these venues provided valuablefeedback. We are also grateful for the administrative and technical support received fromHUBZero, GlobalHUB, and Eckard Groll.INTRODUCTIONEducating future engineers to effectively handle novel ethical dilemmas they may encounter intheir careers, especially those developing and implementing new technology, is a critical andrelevant challenge for a nation that is advancing science and engineering technologies at an everincreasing rate. However, the ethics education programs of most engineering colleges do
together.Engineering Engineering activities in general, which are hands-on and practical to use inActivities the classroom.Model-Eliciting Use of MEA lessons to bring real world mathematics into the classroom.Activities (MEAs)Engineering is Instructional modeling of EiE lessons.Elementary (EiE)Student Teaching engineering in interesting and meaningful ways to increaseMotivation students’ interest in engineering and to encourage students to develop confidence in learning engineering and consider future careers as engineers.Making Mistakes It is O.K. to fail at an engineering task because students can learn from theiris O.K. mistakes.Teacher An increase of
graduation training in the Railway Workshops he joined the Cement industry where he worked for ten years. He got his M.Sc. from University of Aston in 1981 and Ph.D. from City University London in 1991. He joined Brunel universityin 1995 and worked there as a senior lecturer until he left Brunel in September 2011 to join UAEU. Dr Sivaloganathan was the founding Course Director for M.Sc. in Advanced Engineering Design at Brunel.Rajesh Ganithi, UAE University Mr Rajesh Ganithi started his career in engineering with a Diploma in Tool and Die Making from NTTF, India in 1995. In the next twenty years he has gathered enormous amount of experience and exposure while working in various companies in various capacities in