manufacturing. The educational programs are aimed at furthering education in engineering and engineering technology by promoting global excellence in engineering and engineering technology, developing future generations of entrepreneurially-minded engineers. This is achieved by partnering and investing in educational initiatives and programs between industry and institu- tions of higher learning. Michael has served on various advisory groups including, the editorial board of the Journal of Engineering Education, Boeing Higher Education Integration Board, American Society for Engineering Education Project Board and the National Science Foundation I-UCRC Industry University Collaborative Research Center Advisory Board. Michael
satisfaction, diversity,and learning31.Course contentDeveloping the course content involved keeping both aspects of our mission in mind: teachingengineering design as a way of knowing, a broadly relevant method for problem discovery,definition and solution; and also developing students’ professional preparation. The vocabularyof design used in the course was drawn from the IDEO/Stanford d.school version of the designprocess (Figure 1), and from the textbook developed at Harvey Mudd College32.Figure 1. Engineering design process, adapted from Stanford d.schoolCourse topics included: an introduction to the design process; case studies such as the evolutionof bridge design and the way the properties of available engineering materials informs the formand
three most important areas under ‘Intercultural Competency’ include a Cognitivedimension where students gain knowledge about the culture they are encountering; an Affectivedimension where students must become flexible to new situations and learn how to adapt and beopen minded; and finally a Behavioral dimension where students learn about critical skills suchas resourcefulness, problem-solving, and culturally-appropriate social skills.Looking at the current curriculum and why it is important to adapt to the changing world as King[8] noted “the economic realities of global competition and the arrival of ubiquitous broadbandcommunications are driving entry-level and more routine engineering jobs overseas… American
Session 1657 Implementation and Assessment of Industrial Engineering Curriculum Reform Sigurdur Olafsson, Kevin Saunders, John Jackman, Frank Peters, Sarah Ryan, Veronica Dark, and Mary Huba Iowa State UniversityAbstractWe describe a curriculum reform project that aims to improve the industrial engineeringcurriculum through a web-based learning environment that engages students in active andcollaborative learning. This environment focuses on engineering problems solving, increasedinformation technology content, and the higher order cognitive skills
]. Bandura, A., “Self-Efficacy”, in Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, 4: 71-81, V. S. Ramachudran ed., New York, Academic Press, 1994. [2]. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., Cocking, R. R. eds., How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School, Expanded Edition, National Academy Press, Washington DC, 2000. [3]. Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M. Lewis, M., Reimann, P. Glaser, R., “Self-Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems,” Cognitive Science 13, 145-182, 1989. [4]. Harding, T. S., Carpenter, D. D., Finelli, C. J., Passow, H. J., “The Influence of Academic Dishonesty on Ethical Decision-Making in the Workplace: A study of engineering students,” Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference
facultyperformance reviews, improved its quality by demanding appropriate assessment of results,attracted additional engineering professors into the arena, and increased collaborations betweenengineering professors and professors in disciplines like education and psychology."4Scholarly Activities in Engineering EducationIn Scholarship Reconsidered5, Boyer noted that mention of being “scholarly” brings to mindindividuals involved in publication of basic research. And yet he notes that the term researchonly entered the vocabulary of American higher education in 1906. Until then, scholarshipbrought to mind a variety of different forms of creative work. Boyer called for a return to abroader definition of scholarship, which included the scholarship of discovery
students body that promotesentrepreneurship in Central Florida by providing UCF students with a forum to associate withlike-minded entrepreneurial students from various disciplines. Through its bi-weekly meetingswhich feature guest speakers and other activities, UCF SES creates a network of support forUCF entrepreneurs, and provides guidance, resources and hands-on experience in the Page 9.1324.7entrepreneurial process. Throughout the year, the UCF SES offers seminars given byProceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationentrepreneurs
,learning to think critically allows students to make up their own minds. Conventional engineering Page 8.918.5education, by not questioning any application of technology, creates a values vacuum in whichProceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education Session 2692everything is sanctioned, or nothing, so that students have no basis for decision-making.Applying Liberative Pedagogies in the Engineering Classroom
Session 1302 Rocket Systems Engineering Education at the Undergraduate Level Michael J. Caylor, Ronald W. Humble United States Air Force Academy, COAbstractCadets and faculty at the U.S. Air Force Academy are designing and building a sounding rocketpowered by advanced hybrid propulsion. The eventual goal of the program is to launch a vehiclecarrying a small payload to an altitude greater than 50 miles thereby achieving "space." Senior-level cadets are developing a prototype rocket to meet these objectives as part of theirengineering curriculum. The primary objective of this capstone design project
AC 2011-1499: INTRODUCING SYSTEMS THINKING TO THE ENGI-NEER OF 2020Chris R. Rehmann, Iowa State University Chris R. Rehmann is an associate professor in the Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering at Iowa State University. He has served as assistant chair for undergraduate affairs since 2010. His teaching mainly involves hydrology, hydraulics, and environmental fluid mechanics, and his research focuses on mixing in lakes, rivers, and oceans. He has served as an associate editor of Limnology and Oceanography and the Journal of Hydraulic Engineering since 2005.Diane T. Rover, Iowa State University Diane T. Rover received the B.S. degree in computer science in 1984, and the M.S. and Ph.D
this research is emerging, it could provide a spring board to additional researchstudies. The research could include a larger sample of students from diverse schools using Page 22.1520.20distinct engineering curriculum. Different schools and different pre-engineering programs couldbe included. Undoubtedly, students from other pre-engineering curricula would have uniquelanguage, techniques, and themes. The results from this research provide a foundation for newresearch that would further elucidate students’ habits of mind and action. References1. Atman, C.J., D. Kilgore, and A. McKenna
Design Specifications (partial list)producing an operational prototypeOnce all design considerations were accounted for, final design with dimensions had beendetermined, and parts received, the engine was assembled. There were many factors that neededto be adjusted in the commissioning process. At first, the steam valve and the water sprayerwere operated manually. After basic functioning was confirmed, the engine was automatedthrough the use of solenoid valves for steam and water spray and a computer-based controlsystem. Page 25.1325.18The engine was designed with adjustability in mind. Components such as valves and
Session 2602 The Virtual Laboratory: Technology Enhancement for Engineering Education Marilyn Smith, Narayanan Komerath School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA 30332-0150AbstractThis paper continues to report on research that seeks to define the proper role of technology toenhance learning in engineering education. The first application addressed was that ofaugmenting traditional classroom lectures so that classroom and homework time becomes
study to illustrate them. Applying a Global Ethic in Engineering OrganizationsINTRODUCTIONMuch has been written about ethics in engineering. The vast majority of the early and presentday contributions in the area emanate from civil engineering, chemical engineering andbioengineering. Not surprisingly, these fields can and do have significant impact on the qualityof human life and much of the research exists because of the widely accepted values based onthe sacredness of human life. Explicit illustrations of moral dilemmas and widely acceptedsolutions readily come to mind: We do not design overpasses that collapse in earthquakes, wedo not design space shuttles that explode when it gets cold 1 and we do not experiment withhuman
summary keeps in mind that the company executive is interested in the bottom lineand does not have the time to read all the details. It has three parts: the organizational problem(OP) which briefly outlines the problem assigned, the technical tasks (TT) which providesinformation on what was done to address the problem, and the rhetorical purpose (RP) whichgives the conclusions and the recommendations. The executive summary is sometimes referredto as the industrial memo.The discussion component provides more detail on the OP, TT and RP. The discussioncomponent is written to a technical audience who are interested in the specifics such asequipment used, mathematical and engineering analysis, and drawings and graphs. Theintroduction section of the
Session 3213 1 Experiments in Learning Chemical Engineering Modeling Skills Noel Rappin, Mark Guzdial, Matthew Realff, Pete Ludovice College of Computing/School of Chemical Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA 33039-0280/Atlanta GA 30032-0100 770 894-4650 {noel,guzdial}@cc.gatech.edu /{matthew.realff,pete.ludovice}@che.gatech.eduABSTRACTCreating educational
minimum required by a standard undergraduate degree (generally120 credit hours), or as the superfluous credits relative to the student’s specific degree program atgraduation [8, 15]. In this paper, we provide a new definition of excess credit hours (introduced byus in [13]) that takes into consideration the applicability(usability) of credits towards the degreerequirements (refer to Section 3). The more commonly used definition of excess credits used sofar in this Section will be referred to as extra credits from here on in this paper. It is clear thatexcess credits are a subset of extra credits. With this in mind, our primary objective in this paperis to explain the extra credit accumulation pattern of undergraduate engineering students
supervision of Massimo Banzi [1]. The goal of this platform was to providean affordable electronic platform with a low learning curve that could be used by students in orout of a classroom [2]. In 2010, the Arduino UNO came onto the scene and sparked widespreadadoption in many universities across the world. Based on data from Google Scholar, there hasbeen an exponential growth in the number of papers with Arduino, Education, and Engineeringas keywords over the last twenty years (Fig. 1). Since modern engineering problems usually include electrical components, developing aworking understanding and comfort with microprocessors, sensors, and actuators is necessary fortoday’s mechanical engineers [3]. With this in mind, the Mechanical Engineering
AC 2011-1367: TEACHING CLIMATE SCIENCE AND POLICY TO EN-GINEERSSusan Powers, Clarkson University Susan E. Powers is the Associate Director of Sustainablity in the Institute for a Sustainable Environment and a Professor of Environmental Engineering at Clarkson University. She has coupled her research and education endeavors for several years, resulting in the creation of several classes that align with her research interests in industrial ecology and sustainability.Jan DeWaters, Clarkson UniversitySuresh Dhaniyala, Clarkson UniversityMary Margaret M. Small, EdD, Clarkson University Page 22.1376.1
understandingthat the university wanted to help the CCs with their recruitment and retention of pre-engineeringand computer science students and to assist their students with transfer only after they could gono further in their engineering studies at the CC.Representatives from ASU and MCCCD worked together for several months writing a grant forthe National Science Foundation. The primary objective of the project was to work together on aprogram to encourage more potential and actual CC students to consider engineering. The firstauthor had discovered through her research that of the engineering transfer students in Fulton,many of them had gone to a CC with no particular major in mind and had decided on engineeringor computer science after they had
AC 2011-1411: ”THE ENGINEER AS LEADER” COURSE DESIGN ANDASSESSMENTDr. Don E. Malzahn, Wichita State UniversityLawrence E. Whitman, Wichita State University Lawrence E. Whitman is the Director of Engineering Education for the College of Engineering and an Associate Professor of Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering at Wichita State University. He received B.S. and M.S. degrees from Oklahoma State University. His Ph.D. from The University of Texas at Arlington is in Industrial Engineering. He also has 10 years experience in the aerospace industry. His research interests are in enterprise engineering, engineering education and lean manufacturing.Zulma Toro-Ramos, Wichita State University Zulma Toro-Ramos serves as
,” Journal of Engineering Education, 94 (1), Jan. 2005, p.147-164.4. Felder RM and Brent R, “The ABCs of Engineering Education: ABET, Bloom’s Taxonomy, Cooperative Learning, and so on,” Proceedings ASEE Conference, 2004, Session 1375.5. Bransford JD et al, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, National Academy Press, Washington DC, 2003.6. Lohmann JR, Editor, Journal of Engineering Education Special Issue: The Art and Science of Engineering Education Research, Jan. 2005.7. Bloom BS, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives 1. Cognitive Domain, Longman Press, NY, 1984.8. Dym CI and Little P, Engineering Design: A Project-Based Introduction, J. Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2nd Edition, 2004.9
Page 10.673.8 the concomitant charade of teaching evaluations, (2) the single-minded outsourcing of almost every conceivable aspect of Higher Ed Inc., (3) the selling off of academic space Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering Education as the campus becomes commercialized: Georgia Tech put McDonald’s golden arches on the floor of its coliseum, Columbia University lent its name to a for-profit company of- fering distance learning classes over the Internet, The University of California accepted a research grant from a pharmaceutical company to research new drugs and
Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education5. APWA (1981). Public Works Management Trends and Developments. American Public Works Association, Chicago.6. ASCE (2001). Policy Statement 465, http://www.asce.org/news/policy_details.cfm?hdlid=157. Beder, S. (1999). “Beyond Technicalities: Expanding Engineering Thinking.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 125(1), 12-16.8. Bergeron, H.E. (2001). “A Perspective on the Need to Give an Introduction to Engineering Management to All Engineering Students.” Leadership and Management in Engineering, 1(1), 26-29.9. Bloom, A. (1987). The Closing of the American Mind. Simon and
PedagogyA recently piloted multi-disciplinary introduction to engineering course features not only asampling of engineering majors, disciplines, and sub disciplines, but also aims to develop themindsets and skills of well-rounded engineering students. Three faculty members from threeunique engineering disciplines taught the course in a round-robin format; small cohorts ofstudents rotated through one-month modules with each faculty. Modules focused on introducingthe opportunities associated with each engineering major offered at the college and began toform the habits of mind and communication associated with all engineering disciplines.Furthermore, the faculty brought their own liberal arts interests in philosophy, science-fiction,theology, and
Paper ID #8773Promoting Undergraduate Research in the Electrical Engineering Curricu-lumProf. David Hoe, The University of Texas at Tyler David H. K. Hoe did his undergraduate and graduate studies at the University of Toronto. His professional experience includes positions at General Electric’s Research and Development Center as a Staff Engineer and at the University of Texas at Arlington as a Research Associate and Adjunct Professor. He assumed his present position as an Assistant Professor in the Electrical Engineering Department at the University of Texas at Tyler in August 2008. He teaches classes in Computer
. 2000;34(1):16–25.4. National Science Foundation. Introduction to the IGERT program. 2013. Available at: www.nsf.gov/crssprgm/igert/intro.jsp.5. Bransford JD, Brown AL, Cocking RR, eds. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. National Academy Press; 2000.6. Jamieson L, Lohmann JR. Innovation with impact: Creating a Culture for Scholarly and Systematic Innovation in Engineering Education. Washington, DC; 2012.7. Jamieson L, Lohmann J. Creating a Culture for Scholarly and Systematic Innovation in Engineering Education. Washington, DC; 2009.8. Lemke J. Cognition, context, and learning: A social semiotic perspective. In: Kirshner D, Whitson J, eds. Situated Cognition: Social, Semiotic, and
[11]; therefore, students shouldlearn to notice and reflect on the structure, function, and behavior of a process, a device, or anatural phenomena [7]Teamwork Page 24.1155.5Teamwork is central to the work of engineers, as the development of most solutions requiresmultiple people with diverse expertise, perspectives, and skillsets. Engineers collaborate withprofessionals across disciplines gathering multiple perspectives to garner the most effectivedesign solutions [19]. Promoting engineering habits of mind, which includes collaboration [6],has been proposed as one of the three principles to guide engineering education design anddelivery in
acclimation to proficiency.Educational Researcher, 32(8), 10-14.[9] Bransford, J. (Ed.). (2000). How people learn brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded ed.). Washington,D.C.: National Academy Press.[10] Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition andInstruction, 8 (4), 292-332.[11] Denzine, G. (2007, June). Five misconceptions about engineering students' motivation that affect theteaching and learning process. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education, Honolulu,Hawaii.[12] Smith, K. A. (1999, October 28-29, 1999). Cooperative learning and the new paradigm for engineeringeducation. Paper presented at the ABET Annual Meeting, Baltimore, MD.[13] Vergara, C. E
Paper ID #6117Mentoring Engineering Students: Realities, Challenges, and RewardsDr. Waddah Akili, Iowa State University Waddah Akili is an academician and a civil engineering consultant in Ames, Iowa. Has published in various fields including: geotechnical engineering, foundations, and pavement materials & design. He has been involved with contemporary engineering education issues, addressing a wide range of topics of interest and relevance to engineering institutions and practicing engineers, in the U.S. and abroad