just as interested in howstudents have integrated and interpreted all the concepts in relation to the problem and to theother new concepts. To use a metaphor of sorts, we are interested in the topography of theirlearning rather than a fixed snapshot of parts. We want to see a landscape of all the informationthey have gleaned from their own and the research of others in the group. We want to see thecomplexity of the relationships across concept types. We want to understand how their newknowledge is anchored in the problem and integrated so as to reflect relationships and linkages.For this reason we have used concept maps as the data collection instrument because they forcestudents to link concepts and articulate the ways that those concepts
campus is also a decisive factor and issues such as accommodating education and family (childcare). The elimination of harassment, sexism, and discrimination will have a positive impact on the retention of women who have chosen to be engineers. Active participation of woman is also desired to make sure that their perspectives and needs are adequately reflected in the governance of the profession. The Page 7.985.6"Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society of Engineering Education" women
might be: 1) alter the data as your bossrequests, 2) alter the data, but write a memo to keep in your file that expresses your disagreementwith this request, 3) refuse your boss’s request, 4) refuse your boss’s request and go to yourboss’s superior to report his unethical behavior. The simple form of a decision matrix (withoutweights) that might aid in analysis of this case is shown in Table 2. In ranking each alternativewith respect to cultural appropriateness one might consider the corporate culture of theemploying company. The scores in the table might reflect that in this company data are notalways taken that seriously and loyalty to an immediate superior is highly valued. Transparencymight include the idea of honesty and the issue of
students pick their own. This enables theinstructor to assure that the teams reflect greater student diversity. Alternatively, teamsmay be randomly assigned or picked based upon certain experience factors such ascomputer skills, drafting experience, and proficiency with tools. Ultimately, each methodof forming teams has pros and cons; therefore some teams will be more functional thanothers.Within the first few class lessons, students are given a brief introduction to the designprocess. Our coverage of design is limited to brainstorming, research and development,analysis of alternative designs, sketching, and the written report. The teams are requiredto maintain meeting logs that include attendance, meeting minutes, and workassignments. Typically
engineeringeconomy course may want to consider incorporating a multimedia case study that reflects thecomplexity of economic decisions in a real-world environment.BackgroundMercer University offers an ABET-accredited BSE degree with biomedical, computer, electrical,environmental, industrial, and mechanical engineering specializations. A course in engineeringeconomy has been part of the required BSE curriculum ever since Mercer University establisheda School of Engineering. For many years, the course was taught at the junior level and includedstandard engineering economy topics. The transformation of the Engineering Economy coursebegan with a two-year-long curriculum renewal effort instigated by the transition from thequarter system to the semester system
help shape the class, and take ownership of it, the ten students enrolled in theseminar effectively invented their class culture. Active participation in discussion reflectedmultiple points of view, insight, and catalyzed more discussion-centered classes. Theparticipation factor, coupled with the difficulty of predicting how long certain class discussionsmight go, demonstrated a clear need for a semester-long seminar for greater flexibility. Theirwritten assignments reflected points of view that often magnified the reading at hand,demonstrating the importance of every reader to the topic under review—a format thatcapitalizes on each student’s “eyes” so that all benefit from one another’s discoveries. Theiractive engagement in the seminar helps
semester.Table 1 presents the Degree Program Objectives for current and proposed degree programs.Objectives for the biology, chemistry, and mathematics degrees reflect several degree options.Table 2 presents Degree Program Outcomes for each degree. The degree program outcomesfocus on components of the curriculum. The common objectives, or signature, of the academicdegree programs administered by the School are that all graduates have a(n):Ø Ability to function on multidisciplinary teams.Ø Understanding of professional and ethical responsibility.Ø Ability to communicate effectively.Ø Knowledge and skills derived from a liberal arts education.Ø Recognition of the need to engagement in life-long learning.Ø Understanding of leadership and
semester, they would record 98 logins, assuming a 7-day week. The survey allowed formultiple choices on this question; variable phrasing was allowed. In those 10 cases wherestudents picked two login rates, the lower rate was included in the opinion and is shown inFigure 2. A possible explanation for the students’ impression is that the students may have beenbiased by the login activity at the time of the survey; these data may not reflect a consistentbehavior for the semester. 60 Server Number of Students 50 Student Opinion 40 30 20
– Strongly Disagree (question/statement is absolutely false), 2- Disagree (question/statement isabsolutely false), 3 – Uncertain (question/statement is correct, but I have no particular opinion on it), 4 –Agree (question/statement accurately reflect how I feel), 5 – Strongly Agree (question/statement understatesmy opinion, please comment).Number of students responding:13Number of students in the class: 16 Frequency of responsesI. Summary 1 2 3 4 5 AVERAGE1. The MET CS Department of BU should aggressively develop this training offering
a context in which the normal rules do not apply. (Mulder’s use of the wordwhammy reflects other definitions of this slang term; according to the Oxford EnglishDictionary, it was first used by Al Capp in the comic strip “Li’l Abner” in which one characterthreatened to put a hex or to invoke supernatural powers by putting the “whammy” on anothercharacter.) Hence, in talking about the Whammy Line, we want to signal to the students that weare leaving the realm where normal rules apply. Unlike Mulder, we don’t invoke supernaturalforces, but we do want to students to be aware that things may not be as orderly and sensible asthey might wish.To develop the Whammy Line as a tool for moral imagination, we propose to the students thattechnologies can
foracceptable computer-based educational tools. Students were highly critical when smallitems did not conform to expectations; for example, dissatisfaction was expressed whenevery navigation icon did not appeared in the exactly the same location on every screen. When evaluating feedback on specific questions, we were initially puzzled by thestudents’ responses. However, we soon saw the pattern: students wanted figures withevery question. This is likely a desire to understand the physical context and conceptualstructure of the system. Upon reflection, we certainly found this to be a reasonablerequest whose implementation has greatly improved the quality of the educationalmaterials. Why didn’t we do this in the beginning? We have found that
decreasing number of top-5department appearances is not observed as “overall” rank degrades.The present work seeks to circumvent the confounding nature of these issues in two ways. First,by comparing departmental “reputation” rankings by academics with college “reputation”rankings by academics, rather than comparing them with “overall”, formula-driven rankings, wecan eliminate data value and formula bias. 16 By doing so, we reflect back to academics theirperceptions regarding the quality of various programs, not those of the formulas chosen by anon-academic journalist. Second, by accepting that the number of top-5 reputation departments(or some weighted value of this number with the weight based on department rank) may, indeed
7.540.2 Conference & Exposition. Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationThe impetus for reframing this course derived from a systems perspective. The MMSEprogram (by name and definition) focuses on systems approaches to manufacturing. Thiscourse was intended to reflect that systems approach in the realm of design excellence.The majority of students in the MMSE program are engineers working in design,manufacturing and related areas of Minnesota’s manufacturing industry. The companiesthey represent are noted for excellent products and success in their markets. For St.Thomas to offer a course in “Excellence in Product Design”, it had to be somethingbeyond what these engineers
students are much better suited to construction and testing tasks, following thedirections of the engineers.The two students (one from UALR, one from Hendrix) who succeeded in the course werenot Freshmen. The UALR student was a Sophomore level transfer from the EngineeringTechnology program. The Hendrix student was a senior in Physics. These students weremature, possessed some relevant skills, and were confident enough to attempt tasks andlearn from their mistakes.The FIRST competition starts in January, shortly before the beginning of the Springsemester. Freshmen do not have time to develop engineering skills before they need toapply them. Further, the Freshmen engineering students reflected the national trend forincoming students. 9 They were
work together in the class. Page 7.1087.4The allotted tasks can either be given as an individual exercise or as a group exercise Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American So ciety for Engineering Educationdepending on the purpose of the exercise. However, the main benefit of placing the studentsin groups is to encourage peer instruction, to enhance discussion and to provide a supportiveenvironment in the pursuit of improved learning. The importance of this to our teachingmethodology is reflected in the redesign of our teaching rooms
. Page 7.1153.9 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationBibliography1.Hedrick, Maintaining Quality and Student Enthusiasm in a Freshman Engineering Course. ASEE 2001 Annual Conference Proceedings.2.Wilk, Traver, LaPlant, Hedrick, Keat, & Wicks. A Freshman Engineering Course Which Introduces Engineering Design and Engineering Fundamentals in the Context of a Unifying Theme. ASEE 2001 Annual Conference Proceedings.3.Johnson, Johnson, Smith. Active learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom, Interaction Book Company. 19914.Frye, Reflections. Educause Review January/February
modes of learning(concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization, and activeexperimentation). He shows that existing tools are suited to some modes and not others, and that Page 7.1302.1some learning modes are poorly supported.There is growing agreement that group-based, collaborative learning approaches are moreeffective than traditional lecture-based instruction5. In addition, team-based collaboration hasbecome a central element of the workplace as well. Broadly, collaboration involves a group ofpeople working toward a common goal. Effective collaboration involves several key activities,including6: · Cognitive
within the context of two carefullycrafted IT concentration areas. The BS IT program will fill a niche that hasresulted from the rapidly expanding body of knowledge that lies between existingdisciplines such as CS and DMIS.IV.1. BS IT CurriculumThe BS IT curriculum reflects the latest advances in the IT field, includinginterdisciplinary and global approaches where appropriate. An acceptable level ofcompetency in IT can be achieved within the constraints of the 120 semestercredit hours of class work and projects. This number of credits meets GeorgeMason University requirements as well as the existing Commonwealth of Virginiaguidelines for undergraduate degrees. Table 1 below provides the semester-by-semester curriculum for the BS IT major
Session 3220 Expanding the Undergraduate Laboratory Experience Using Web Technology Sven K. Esche, Dennis J. Hromin Stevens Institute of TechnologyAbstractStevens Institute of Technology is currently implementing a new undergraduate engineeringcurriculum. This curriculum reflects the recent nationwide trend towards enhancement oftraditional lecture-based courses with a design spine and a laboratory experience that propagatesthrough the entire educational program. In the course of the curriculum development, it wasrecognized that the
transition. One major component is a series of mentoring courses that the entering studentcan select for the first semester. These courses are designed to help the freshman make thismajor transition. This paper will discuss the purpose of the mentors, the ENGR0081 SeminarCourse concept, the mentor selection process, and the topics covered in the mentoring sessions.IntroductionNumerous studies document the importance of interaction with the freshman students duringtheir first semester [1 - 9]. This concept is nothing new, as reflected in the fact that mostcolleges have an orientation program for entering students. One component we use at theUniversity of Pittsburgh is getting the involvement of parents and other family members in theprocesses and
day to calculus instruction. The need for calculus is reinforced asthey spend the rest of the day working with engineers who are using these math skills to solveproblems that create better products.Another company that has developed a successful program for recruiting more minorities isUnited Technologies Corporation. UTC encourages engineers to mentor local high schoolstudents. The mentors work with students on various research projects. They provide theleadership, direction, and guidance necessary to foster a successful research project. Many ofthese volunteer mentors are alumni of the local high school. They state that their motivationfor involvement is to create a future workforce that reflects the diversity that they would like tosee
time students reach their junior or senior year, they should already haveinformation skills. This, of course, is an entirely appropriate assumption but, as discussed earlierin this paper, it does not reflect the reality of the situation that exists in colleges and universitiestoday. The main drawback to course-integrated instruction is that, despite its relevance to classwork, students don’t seem to retain what they learn. This view is based on a great deal ofanecdotal evidence accumulated from personal experience working with students over the yearsand getting a sense of what they know. In the fall 2000 semester, we decided to investigate thematter further by conducting an informal survey among NC State University undergraduates, adiscussion
changes in major (thus allowing the institution to easily study the patterns of student major changes over v time.) It cannot be overemphasized that all data should be reported by gender and race. Due to ABET and other assessment efforts, there is increasing emphasis placed on alumni reflections on their educational experiences. In 1998 Georgia Tech already had established a 5-year post-graduation Alumni Survey. Like the institutional data collection process, the redesign of this survey has been affected by the increased awareness on campus of diversity issues. As such, the Alumni Survey now includes questions related to campus climate and equity. vNew Initiatives Georgia Tech is aggressively
enough topreserve a strong sense of community and manageable class sizes, yet large enough to allow avariety of course offerings.Since its inception in 1893, Queen’s Faculty of Applied Science has graduated more than 21,000engineers, many of whom have distinguished themselves nationally and internationally. Thefaculty provides instruction to more than 2,100 undergraduate students each year in 10engineering disciplines.Over the ensuing years, there have been many changes, particularly in the Faculty of AppliedScience. In recent years the Faculty has had to reflect on the path forward for the variousprograms in the faculty. It was realized that Queen’s has some major strengths that we couldbuild upon, such as a long-standing tradition of
directory “webtest2” at the site: http://comp.uark.edu/~icjong/webtest2/the source program of this HTML file, written to display just two tests as shown in Fig. 1, canreadily be created and is illustrated as follows: test.htmlInteractive Web-Based TestsInteractive Web-Based TestsTest 1: Practice TestThis test uses radio-button menu for choosing answers. Click here to take the test.Test 2: Some Elementary Concepts in StaticsThis test uses radio-button menu for choosing answers. Click here to take the test.The above HTML file does reflect that both of the files testrad.cgi and test#.dat are presentlysaved in the sub-directory webtest2 under the user directory ~icjong in the
single bar magnet down a tube through one coil and examining the inducedemf on an oscilloscope. The experiment then progresses to two magnets and two coils withvarying spacings amongst themselves. The reflective sensor is utilized for determining speed.An analytical model for this device is beyond the scope of the course, even beyond the scope ofundergraduate engineering, thus students see the value of empirical evidence and the role ofexperiment in design. Students discover that the ‘best’ output results when the coil spacing andmagnet spacing are matched.4.3 Strain GagesStrain gages are of the resistive type commonly used for measuring strain, force, and pressure.The strain gage consist of a thin film of conducting material applied to a film
, 10, 11, 12, 13 . Research shows thatsuch approach can accommodate multiple learning styles and personalities 14 . Some engineeringprograms have been almost totally revised to allow room for learning through doing, that is bycreating educational environment that closer reflects real-world engineering practice 15 .Two Engineering Technology programs at CCSU, Manufacturing and Mechanical, require coursein manufacturing process planning. The course has traditionally covered technical aspects ofvarious manufacturing processes and technical aspects of planning a part making process (a clearlydefined technical goal). Based on the author’s current experience with industrial projects, severalvery important aspects of engineering work had to be
-analysis andaligning one’s intent with positive micro-messaging, engineering educators may begin theirjourney towards creating positive classroom environments for women and other marginalizedgroups. By effectively using micro-affirmations, clearly delineating parameters of acceptablebehavior (e.g., rendering micro-inequities visible), and making a conscious effort to view theeducational environment through the eyes of non-privileged groups, engineering faculty andmentors will make a great impact for all students, especially women. The power and effect ofchanging one’s language and subtle behaviors cannot be emphasized enough.A further step would be to move beyond individual reflection and behavioral changes to begindiscussing issues of privilege
Caribbean countries, and Venezuela worked toward convertingincandescent to fluorescent lighting, and other countries including the UK and Canada have sinceadopted a phase-out of inefficient incandescent lighting14. This global issue was addressed at the2007 IESNA/Cooper Teachers of Lighting Workshop by an international cohort of lightingeducators. This consortium considered methods of incorporating energy efficient lightingmethodology into relevant coursework, transforming traditional lighting design education. Asthese legislative directives are recent and continually evolving, architectural and interior designcurricula must stay abreast of developments to reflect emerging issues in lighting technology.It is pertinent for students to understand
theengineering fields so our students are engaged and excited about their chosen field of study byseeing and discussing the end product of the industry‟s efforts.Collaborating with engineering success coursesIn reflecting on the Freshman Career Exploration Evening, it occurs to us that the event seems tohave taken place in a vacuum with little actual and deliberate ties to other experiences that our Page 22.768.10engineering freshmen encounter. With this in mind, the Engineering Career Center is developinga multifaceted freshman career exploration curriculum that will be plugged into the engineeringsuccess courses starting the fall of 2011. The Freshman