the new course format in acquiring those skills.Bibliography1. National Academy of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century (Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press, 2004).2. National Science Board, Moving Forward to Improve Engineering Education (Arlington, VA.: National Science Foundation, 2007).3. Gretar T. and Diran A., Re-Engineering Engineering Education for the Challenges of the 21st Century, Journal of Engineered Materials (JOM), pg. 14, (2006).4. Sheppard, S. D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A. & Sullivan, W. M., Educating Engineers: Designing the Future of the Field, (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2008).5. Howard, I. and Smith, B., Hands-on Development of Communication
the spring to present the co-roboticcourse to recruit teachers.AcknowledgmentNational Science Foundation supports this work under grant numbers 1426989 and 1453886.References[1] J. L. Irwin, J. Pearce, G. Anzolone, and D. Oppliger, “The reprap 3-D printer revolution in stem education,” in 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014.[2] S. Ziaeefard, G. Ribeiro, and N. Mahmoudian, “GUPPIE, underwater 3d printed robot a game changer in control design education,” in American Control Conference (ACC), 2015, pp. 2789–2794, July 2015.[3] N. L. States, “Next generation science standards: For states, by states,” 2013.[4] A. Bonarini and M. Romero, Robotics and Design: An Interdisciplinary Crash Course, 2013.[5] X. Zhu and J. Lin
novice designers.Design Studies. 2009; 30; 38-59.4. Smith D, Hedley P, Molloy M. Design learning: a reflective model. Design Studies. 2009; 30; 13-37.5. Chua KJ. A comparative study on first-time and experienced project-based learning students in an engineeringdesign module. European Journal of Engineering Education. 2014; 39(5); 556-572.6. Gomez-Puente S, van Eijk M, Jochems W. A sample literature review of design-based learning approaches: asearch for key characteristics. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 2013; 23; 717-732.7. Chua KJ, Yang WM, Leo HL. Enhanced and conventional project-based learning in an engineering designmodule. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 2014; 24; 437-458.8. Rasul MG
of Testing Tools in SE Courses," in the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '11)., New York, NY, USA, 2011. [8] A. P. Rovai, M. K. Ponton and M. J. Wighting, "A Comparative Analysis of Student Motivation in Traditional Classroom and E-Learning Courses," International Journal on E-Learning, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 413-432, 2007. [9] A. Goswami, G. S. Walia and S. Aburardeh, "Using a Web-Based Testing Tool Repository in Programming Course: An Empirical Study," in the 2014 International Conference on Frontiers in Education: Computer Science and Computer Enginee, 2014. [10] S. Wolfe and R. Flewitt, "New technologies, new multimodal practices and young children’s metacognitive," Cambridge Journal
. References[1] A. Taylor. Women and the city: Examining the gender impacts of violence and urbanisation. ActionAid USA, Available: http://www.actionaidusa.org, Accessed 17 October 2013.[2] A. Taylor. Women and the city 2 combating violence against women and girls in urban public spaces the role of public services. ActionAid USA, Available: http://www.actionaidusa.org, Accessed 17 October 2013.[3] US Agency for International Development, Excellence in Higher Education for Liberian Development Request for Applications 66910019, Available: http://liberia.usaid.gov/EHELD, Accessed 25 June 2013.[4] Reddivari, S., Dreyer, E. F. C., Rimer, S., & Cotel, A. (2016). Towards a global virtual community of female engineering students and professionals
programs such as S-STEM for just such students with unmet financial need. Thescholarships allow the students to work less or not at all, and to put more of their energy intoacademics. At Arizona State University, the author has led such scholarship programs with anAcademic Success and Professional Development classes for nearly 15 years. During this timeshe has continually done research on the best way to support and encourage students to do wellacademically, to graduate, and to go right on to graduate school. This research has used groundedtheory and Social Cognitive Career Theory to understand how best to recruit and retain students.Beginning with seminars, over the years, the author developed a successful two-credit AcademicSuccess and
the inside border.Figure 12 Replica of an oversized penny. Fine details in the surface of the part turned outsurprisingly well.Casting the Parts in MSOE’s FoundryFigure 13 Casting the finished parts in MSOE’s foundry.ConclusionsIn past years MSOE students did sand molding in lab but did not use the SolidCast™ simulation.The approach used was very simple and based on an accepted “rule of thumb” that thesolidification time for a riser should be at least 1.25 times the solidification time of the parts.Solidification time of each can be calculated based on Chvorinov’s rule. Solidification time t(s) = B (V/A)^2 Where V = volume of the part or riser, A = surface area of the part or riser, B = anempirical mold constant. Then, according
campus through initiatives such as the ”S” course designation and showcasing of best practices. Mrs. Ellenburg’s work on campus-level initiatives at UT has included service on the 2015 SACS Qual- ity Enhancement Plan writing team, the 2014 Carnegie Community Engagement writing team, the 2010 UT Community Engagement Task Force writing team, and coordinating author for the 2010 whitepaper ”Student Ownership, and the College Experience.” Last year she received the Chancellor’s Award for Environmental Leadership for her leadership of sustainability-focused service-learning and the SCI. Mrs. Ellenburg serves on the Board of Directors for the Educational Partnerships for Innovation in Communi- ties Network (EPIC-N), the
). Dr. Leydens won the James F. Lufkin Award for the best conference paper—on the intersections between professional communication research and social jus- tice—at the 2012 International Professional Communication Conference. In 2015, he won the Ronald S. Blicq Award for Distinction in Technical Communication Education from the Professional Communica- tion Society of the Institute for Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE). His current research focuses on rendering visible and integrating the social justice dimensions inherent in three components of the engineering curriculum—in engineering sciences, engineering design, and humanities and social science courses. That research, conducted with co-author Juan C
. Indianapolis.8. Perez-Castilleos, R, & Santhanam, P. R. (2014). Student-led Mentoring Program Fostering Retention of FemaleUndergraduate Students in STEM Fields. Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education. Indianapolis.9. Clark, J. I., Godd, S. L., Des Jardins, A. C., Foreman, C. M., Gunnink, B. W., Plumb, C., & Stocker, K. R. (2015).Peer Mentoring Program: Providing early intervention and support to improve retention and success of women inengineering, computer science, and physics. Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education. Seattle.10. Kim, D. L., Lee, Y. H., & Oh, M. S. (2012). Effect of Women in Engineering Programs on the Retention ofFemale Engineering Students. Presented at the Inaugural International
: The Industry View. The Royal Academy of Engineering, London, 2006.[12] L. H. Jamieson and J. R. Lohman, “Creating a culture for scholarly and systematic innovation in engineering education: ensuring U.S. engineering has the right people with the right talent for a global society,” Phase 1 Report, ASEE, 2009.[13] I. C. Peden, E. W. Ernst, and J.W. Prados, “Systemic engineering education reform: an action agenda,” National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C., 1995.[14] E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the selfdetermination of behavior, Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268 (2000).[15] C. F. Ratelle, F. Guay, R. J. Vallerand, S. Larose, and C. Senécal
this paper are those ofthe authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science FoundationReferences:(1) Yawson, R. M. An epistemological framework for nanoscience and nanotechnology literacy. Int J Technol Des Educ 2012, 22, 297-310.(2) Resources: Courses Browse Visually. https://nanohub.org/resources/courses (accessed May 25, 2014.(3) Veety, E. N.; Ozturk, M. C.; Escuti, M.; Muth, J.; Misra, V. In Tilte, Indianapolis, Indiana2014(4) Rodgers, K. J.; Kong, Y.; Diefes-Dux, H. A.; Madhavan, K. In Tilte2014.(5) Schlosser, P.; Trott, B.; Tomasko, D.; Clingan, P.; Allam, Y.; Merrill, J. In Tilte, Chicago, Illinois2006.(6) Abernathy, S. M.; Carruthers, B. E.; Presley, K. F.; Clingan, P. A. In Tilte, San Antonio, Texas2012.(7
, Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, TX, 2012.4. Blum, MM., Cadwell, KD., Hasenwinkel, JM. A Mechanics of Materials Outreach Activity – Reconstructing the Human Body: Biomaterials and Biomimicry. Proceedings of the 2015 ASEE Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA, 2015.5. Yen, J., Helms, M., Gibbons, S., Hinds, B., DeLuca, D., Ching, J., Gould, C., Wong, C., Hastrich, C., Zegarac, D., Eggermont, M. What Has Fins Like A Whale, Skin Like A Lizard, And Eyes Like A Moth? The Future Of Engineering, Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE Conference & Exposition, Austin, TX, 2009.6. Moore, TJ., Maruyama, K. Nature-Inspired Design: A PictureSTEM Project Curriculum Module (Curriculum Exchange
design communication. Advanced Engineering Informatics 27, 580-597 (2013).9 Neuroscience, N. Revolutionizing peer review. Nat. Neurosci 8, 10.1038 (2005).10 Vaughan, L. & Shaw, D. Web citation data for impact assessment: A comparison of four science disciplines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 56, 1075- 1087 (2005).11 Thelwall, M., Vaughan, L. & Björneborn, L. Webometrics. ARIST 39, 81-135 (2005).12 Sud, P. & Thelwall, M. Evaluating altmetrics. Scientometrics 98, 1131-1143 (2014).13 Popielarski, M. Assessing Altmetrics: Why Law Librarians (and Law Schools) Should Care About Altmetrics. AALL Spectrum 19, 28 (2014).14 Galligan, F. & Dyas-Correia, S. Altmetrics
., Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 2013: Sage Publications.4. Nonaka, I., A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, 1994. 5(1): p. 14-37.5. Brown, J.S. and P. Duguid, Knowledge and Organization: A Social-practice Perspective. Organization Science, 2001. 12(2): p. 198-213.6. Alavi, M. and D.E. Leidner, Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues. MIS Quarterly, 2001. 25(1): p. 107-136.7. Hansen, M.T. and M.R. Haas, Competing for Attention in Knowledge Markets: Electronic Document Dissemination in a Management Consulting Company. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2001: p. 1- 28.8. Moran, P. and S
student engagement and learning, Last AccessedOctober 20, 2015.14. Salas-Morera, L., Arauzo-Azofra, A., and Garcia-Hernandez, L. (2012). Analysis of Online Quizzes as aTeaching and Assessment Tool, Journal of Technology and Science Education, 2(1).15. Johnson, B. C. and Kiviniemi, M. T. (2009). The effect of online chapter quizzes on exam performance in anundergraduate social psychology course. Teaching of Psychology, 36, 33–37.16. Bonham, S. W., Deardorff, D. L. and Beichner, R. J. (2003). Comparison of student performance using weband paper-based homework in college-level physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 10, 1050–1071.17. Engelbrecht, J. and Harding, A. (2004). Combing online and paper assessment in a web-based course
Press and IEEE Computer Society Press, December 2013. 2. F. T. Anbari. Earned Value Project Management Method and Extensions. Project Management Journal, 34(4):12–23, 2003. 3. S. Augustine. Managing agile projects. Prentice Hall PTR, 2005. 4. K. Beck, M. Beedle, A. Van Bennekum, W. Cockburn, Alistair Cunningham, M. Fowler, J. Grenning, J. Highsmith, A. Hunt, and R. Jeffries. Agile Manifesto, 2001. 5. B. Bruegge, M. Reiss, and J. Schiller. Agile principles in academic education: A case study. ITNG 2009 - 6th International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations, pages 1684–1686, 2009. 6. T. Chow and D.-B. Cao. A survey study of critical success factors in agile software projects. Journal of Systems and Software, 81:961
University [Said, et al,2015]. A critical component of a national “green industries/green/energy jobs” effort is to motivatestudent communities and workforce to become proficient in STEM and associated manufacturingfields and trades, thus ensuring a 21st-century workforce. This senior design project engagesstudents in the implementation of an innovative method for improving design and measuringenergy efficiency using statistical process control. Through this project, students learn how toprovide a design method for evaluating the characteristics of green energy manufacturing. Thisstudent senior design project was in collaboration with Higginbothom Farm in New Jersey, whichis s a commercial farm that supplies restaurants, farmer’s markets, and grain
Science Foundation.References[1] Froyd, Jeffrey E., et al. "Estimates of use of research-based instructional strategies in core electrical or computerengineering courses." Education, IEEE Transactions on 56.4 (2013): 393-399.[2] Borrego, M., Cutler, S., Froyd, J., Prince, M., & Henderson, C. (2011). Faculty use of research basedinstructional strategies.[3] Prince, Michael, et al. "Use of research-based instructional strategies in core chemical engineering courses."Chemical Engineering Education 47.1 (2013): 27-37.[4] Henderson, C., Beach, A., and Finkelstein, N., Facilitating change in undergraduate stem instructional practices:An analytic review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2011. 48(8): p. 952-984.[5] Borrego
materials technology (wood) and construction studies. Dublin: Stationary Office.8. IDEO website. Accessed at https://www.ideo.com/9. Lawson, B. & Bassanino, M., et al. (2003). Intentions, practices and aspirations: Understanding learning in design. Design Studies, 24, 4, 327-339.10. Gray, P. (2012). Freedom to Learn, The Roles of Play and Curiosity as Foundations for Learning. Psychology Today. Retrieved from: www.psychologytoday.com/blog/freedom-learn/201209/children-s- freedom-has-declined-so-has-their-creativity11. Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative thinking, (3rd ed.). New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.12. Behnam, B. & Alvelos, H. (2011). Exploring the
stimulated my learning. 1 15 6 I am very satisfied with this workshop. 1 15 7 The presenter(s) was enthusiastic and pleasant. 1 15 8 The workshop was well organized. 1 15 9 I feel prepared to use this module in my class. 3 11 2 10 My students have the necessary background knowledge to complete this module
and understanding the electrical characteristics from a data sheet,etc. Using the Analog Discovery Boards, several experiments and tutorials were created, for in-class demonstration and/or lab experiments. Such an example is presented in figure 6. In thisexperiment the transfer characteristics of a CMOS logic gate used as an inverter is investigated. 1 14 1A S VCC 2 13 1B N 4B 12 3 1Y 7 4A
Colleges and Universities (2016). Recent Trends in GeneralEducation Design, Learning Outcomes, and Teaching Approaches, Association ofAmerican Colleges and Universities, Washington, DC.Barber, James. Integration of Learning: A Grounded Theory Analysis of CollegeStudents’ Learning, American Educational Research Journal, June 2012, Vol. 49, No. 3,pp. 590-617.Bloom, B. S.; Engelhart, M. D.; Furst, E. J.; Hill, W. H.; Krathwohl, D. R. (1956).Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. HandbookI: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company.Boix-Mansilla, V. (2005). Assessing student work at disciplinary crossroads. Change, 37(January/February), 14–21.Bordogna, Joseph, Fromm, Eli, and Ernst, Edward W. (2013
also extend to the mentors.ReferencesAmaral, K. E., & Vala, M. (2009). What teaching teaches: Mentoring and the performance gains of mentors. J. Chem. Educ, 86(5), 630.Collings, R., Swanson, V., & Watkins, R. (2014). The impact of peer mentoring on levels of student wellbeing, integration and retention: a controlled comparative evaluation of residential students in UK higher education. Higher Education, 68(6), 927-942.Gafney, L., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2008). Peer-led team learning: evaluation, dissemination, and institutionalization of a college level initiative (Vol. 16): Springer Science & Business Media.Hug, S., Thiry, H., & Tedford, P. (2011). Learning to love computer science: peer leaders
specifically, responses from Question 2 of the firstand second activities were qualitatively evaluated using the rubric presented in Table 4. Thisparticular question, which was repeated in both activities, prompts the students with “Whatinformation do you think you need to know to answer the driving question? List all of the factorsand/or variables that are needed and identify which ones are the most important. For eachfactor/variable listed, offer a rationale for why it is needed. For example, through whatmechanism/s does it affect strength enhancement?” The rubric was designed to gain an overviewof the general state of student understanding of nanomaterials at the nanoscale and theirrelevance in the context of cement mortar. Scores of Poor, Good
. Science Education, 78:527–554, 1994. [3] B. Chen, M. West, and C. Zilles. Do performance trends suggest wide-spread collaborative cheating on asynchronous exams? In Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning at Scale, 2017. doi: 10.1145/3051457.3051465. [4] J. A. Kulik and C.-L. C. Kulik. Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Review of Educational Research, 58:79–97, 1988. [5] K. A. Lack. Current status of research on online learning in postsecondary education. Ithaka S+R, 2013. [6] McGraw-Hill. McGraw-Hill Connect. URL http://connect.mheducation.com/. [7] H. Pashler, N. J. Cepeda, J. T. Wixted, and D. Rohrer. When does feedback facilitate learning of words? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning
be more directly comparable with Senior Exit Survey responses and FE Exam scores. 3. Expand course-based Embedded Indicator results to include sample standard deviation allowing analysis of sample variance and evaluation of standards with regard to acceptable lower distribution limits for student performance, rather than merely a comparison of a student average.References 1. Little, D. L., Quardokus Fisher, K., Brown, S. A., Koretsky, M., Bouwma-Gearhart, J., “Measuring Student Perceptions of Engineering Classroom Activities and the Use of Such Measures by STEM Faculty: The Development of the Student Class Activity and Engagement Instrument,” Proceedings of the 122nd American Society for Engineering
-study Scholar. She served as chair of S-STEP from 2013-2015 and is a current Co-PI of two National Science Foundation (NSF) funded grants: Designing Teaching: Scaling up the SIMPLE Design Framework for Interactive Teaching Development and a research initiation grant: Student-directed differ- entiated learning in college-level engineering education. Her research centers on facilitating and studying her role in faculty development self-study collaboratives. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Applying Conjecture Mapping as a Design-Based Research Method to Examine the Design and Implementation of a Teaching Development Project for
impacting them and their students (if they are, in fact, teaching inclassrooms).Just over half (51%) of the respondents indicated that they were K-12 teachers (almost one-quarter of whom had been teaching for at least 20 years), 6% indicated that they were “K-12educator[s] in an informal learning setting,” 3% “engineer[s] engaged in K-12 outreach,” and 2%“community member[s] engaged in K-12 outreach.” Another 38% of respondents identified withan “other” category, which included students, homeschool teachers, university faculty,community college instructors, as well as a self-described curriculum developer, a scienceinstructional coach, and a teacher’s aide.The users varied in how often they reported teaching TeachEngineering curriculum in
, Switzerland, Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp. v-viii.[3] C. J. Thaiss and T. M. Zawacki, Engaged Writers Dynamic Disciplines, Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook Publishers, Inc. , 2006.[4] D. Melzer, Assignments Across the Curriculum, Boulder, CO: Utah State University Press, 2014.[5] M. Eodice, A. E. Geller and N. Lerner, The Meaningful Writing Project, Boulder: Utah State University Press, 2016.[6] S. Harrington, S. Dinitz, R. Bennett, L. Davenport and K. Warrender, "Turning Stories from the Writing Center into Useful Knowledge: Writing Centers, WID Programs, and Partnerships for Change," in Writing Program and Writing Center Collaboration: Transcending Boundaries, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2017, pp. 141-160.[7] M