network.Experimental ResultsThe wired BMS system was tested with a 12-cell pack. MATLAB was used to connect to theParent BMS Module and preform various read and write operations. The BMS was initialized topreform voltage measurements on each individual cell and the voltage of the block. Testing wasperformed on all four packs simultaneously. All voltages were confirmed by multi-meter. Balancingwas tested and confirmed working with the packs. The Wireless BMS uses a parent childarchitecture. First a request for cell information is made from the parent to the child pack. Theparent now waits for a response. The child communicates with the BMS chip and relays the datarequests back to the parent. This keeps wireless activity at a minimum since the children only
engineering ethics, peer-to-peer learning in the design process has helped her identify the effective approaches to educate engineering students, in order to meet the demands of their profession. She will be starting her PhD in the fall of 2015 at The University of Oklahoma.Dr. Diana Bairaktarova, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK Dr. Diana Bairaktarova is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Practice in the College of Engineering at University of Oklahoma. Through real-world engineering applications, Dr. Bairaktarova’s experiential learning research spans from engineering to psychology to learning sciences, as she uncovers how indi- vidual performance is influenced by aptitudes, spatial skills, personal interests and
. Administering a peerevaluation tool is essential since much of the course grade will depend on the groupproject. CATME45, 46 is an easy-to-use online tool that collects and analyzes self and peerevaluations of team members’ contributions. Ideally some type of peer evaluationinstrument is administered with each major deliverable, and team members receivefeedback on their individual performance compared to the group average. Any lowperforming students should be identified by the instructor, and the team should meet withthe instructor to discuss the issue so that it can be addressed early. Instructors might alsoconsider a mechanism that reflects in individual contribution; for example, students couldbe required to keep a design notebook47 or submit their
. He has published 16 papers in peer-reviewed journals, 28 papers in peer-reviewed conference proceedings, and given 12 technical presentations on various topics including: additive manufacturing, mechatronics, biomechanics, and engineering education. He currently teaches the Engineered Systems In Society, Mechanical Engineering Professional Practice, and Capstone Design I and II courses. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Exploring the Impact of Study Sheets on Students' Performance in an Engineered Systems in Society CourseAbstractThe purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of study sheets on second-year engineeringstudents' performance in an
. With all of the media hype, it is easy to lose sight as towhat Java is, and why it is so interesting. For many people, Java is simply a way to add “flash” tootherwise static WWW pages. However, what is truly exciting about Java is that, for the first time,it is possible to write highly interactive, graphical applications which are platform-independentand can be transported across the WWW. These features, combined with the availability andpervasiveness of the Internet and WWW, make Java an attractive tool for developing anddistributing educational software.BackgroundTo understand the potential benefits of Java for educational software development, it is necessaryto understand some of Java’s main features. First of all, Java is a general purpose
response statements and open responsequestions. This survey contained items about teams, various aspects of changing teammembers frequently, Super Tetris® team project, team projects, and the course format.Once the students completed the survey, they were invited to discuss the items with oneto two of their nearest peers. After a short peer discussion, most of the time was devotedto a facilitated discussion around items in the survey to help clarify responses to surveyitems and for students to elaborate on their responses. The facilitator of the discussionwas not the instructor of the course.Survey ResultsThere were 46 students enrolled in the course. Of the 46 students, 11 volunteered toparticipate in the small group analysis.Choice Response
investigate the development of technology in civil, mechanical,chemical, and electrical engineering in the context of historical case studies. As part of thecourse, students working in groups prepare and present an engineering history case study. Thestudents, working in groups of 3 to 5, write technical papers and present their results on the lastday of class. This allows the student groups to develop and demonstrate their communicationskills as well as their mastery of the course concepts. The student projects provide otherbenefits. Projects that are done well can be incorporated into future offerings of the course. Anexample is how the development and eventual decline of the Ohio canal system influenced thegrowth of the state’s economy, and how the
expanding the inventory ofavailable electrical components and changing the intended client of the device.In the future, we will more formally assess the success of each design experience using thefollowing criteria: 1) percentage of teams that complete successful prototypes, 2) number ofstudents in each team contributing to work (as measured by peer review), 3) student satisfaction(self-reported), and 4) quality of student feedback to other teams. We will also perform aqualitative analysis of the responses to reflective questions teams will answer about the designexperience as part of the lab write-ups.
approximately 700 grant proposals, including co-writing, editing and serving as the Program Manager for 9 awarded STEM educa- tion grants totaling more than $14M. She has collaborated with University offices, faculty and staff in the facilitation of recruitment strategies to increase the quality and quantity of undergraduate and graduate enrollment in STEM programs. Ms. Ward now manages the fundraising and grant writing for CAS- TLE and ExPERTS programs, including assisting with hiring and overseeing awarded projects as well as coordinating program evaluation.Dr. Adam K Fontecchio, Drexel University Dr. Adam Fontecchio is a Professor in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at Drexel University, and is the
variants of learning modules thatfacilitate STEM ethics learning for the diverse students in the classroom. This research drawsupon 264 surveys and student-writing samples from students across four institutions, specificallyNotre Dame, St. Mary’s College, Xavier University-Louisiana, and University of Virginia. Theaim of this initial research is to explore the heterogeneity of students in STEM classrooms, whiledemonstrating that STEM students can be described more holistically when personality and othernon-demographic characteristics are recognized as important attributes in a learner-centeredenvironment. This paper supports the notion that, prior to the start of instruction, the mosteffective instructors will critically review and consider a
Paper ID #22886Work in Progress: Transforming a CourseDr. Polly R. Piergiovanni, Lafayette College Polly R. Piergiovanni is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Lafayette College. Besides chemical engineering courses, she teaches an engineering course to nonengineering students. Her current research interests include critical thinking evident in student writing and assessing learning in experiential learning activities. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Work in Progress: Transforming a CourseThird year students at Lafayette College enroll in an Applied Fluid Dynamics and
, undergraduate engineering education should form the basis for a lifetime of learning.And, a little later: Writing can help achieve these goals in unique ways, and we argue that most courses should incorporate writing in some fashion.“Writing” may be too limited a word; “communication” better covers the range of skillswhich can serve engineers well to avoid obsolescence and to maintain a technicalcompetitive edge. Page 8.1059.5Paul L. Ross UW-Madison 5 Teaching Communication Skills OnlineD. The Virtues of the “Classroom” for Engaged ParticipantsThe virtues of the real “classroom” encourage engagement and participation by
be too complex for a student to understand andneed to be augmented by faculty. Writing tutorials of this nature is very time intensive;splitting up the work among collaborating faculty can ease this burden.Even though industrial support and collaborative effort greatly facilitate the ability todevelop and maintain VLSI design and fabrication curriculum, many tenure andpromotion processes tend to emphasize scholarly activity in the form of publications andgrant dollars over teaching activities5 (such as lab development).Another problem is some tenure and promotion committees tend to “bean count” firstauthor publications even though some have recognized that this can lead to faculty notcollaborating.6 (Meaning: It is easier to determine if a
Session 2793 The Style Guide as an Instruction Tool for Structured Programming Scott D. Baldwin Oklahoma State UniversityAbstractStructured programming skills are a must for anyone writing computer software. This paper willpresent to the reader the concept of the style guide as a tool for insuring structured programmingskills are developed by both novice and experienced programmers.A style guide is normally a written document, either hard copy or on-line, that provides rules forformatting, documenting, variable naming and other important skills that are required forinsuring
(Fall & Spring term) Computing and information technology Writing and communication Summer term Ethics in science and technology Entrepreneurship and management of innovation Start of the senior thesis Second year Information systems technology track: Telecommunication networking (Fall & Spring term) Information and network security Relational databases System integration Alternative energy Biotechnology
A&M University in 2002. His research involves Computer Graphics, Virtual Learning/Training Environments, Scientific Visualization, and Computer Network Security. Page 15.737.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Infusing Tablet PCs and Interactive Learning Technology into Computer Science Education to Enhance Student LearningAbstractStudents from the digital age are visual and active learners who prefer strong interaction withtheir peers and instructors. Traditional lecturing styles are insufficient in grasping the attention ofthese students and in supporting their learning needs. Tablet
engaged in any scholarly activities that allow him orher to peer review technical papers or publications of other students in the Ph.D. program. Thisissue deserves attention. One of the primary goals of a Ph.D. program is to prepare a graduatestudent to conduct an independent research study and more importantly, to conduct researchwork on his her own upon graduation and publish research papers in technical journals orconference proceedings. Publications in technical journals require that the work be peeredreviewed. So, why does a student have to complete his or her dissertation before he or she learnshow to write a successful technical journal?Fourth, as noted before the format for the traditional Ph.D. dissertations does not require thestudent’s
is insufficient to address Latinx student needs, especially atHSIs[10], [11], [12]. A 2017 paper [13] outlines a literature review of innovations and interventionsthat intend to improve the outcomes for areas of study based in mathematics. The pedagogicalapproaches discussed in the reviewed literature included active learning, hands-on projects,mentoring programs, use of technology, one-to-one help, and peer study groups. The paper notedthat there is relatively little literature on rigorous evaluations of the interventions. There is a need todevise innovative math remediation methods that are more engaging, effective, and less costly tostudents. In this National Science Foundation funded project, engineering and math faculty from thelarge R1
American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Novel Approach to Conducting Labs in an Introduction to Thermodynamics CourseAbstractThis paper describes an easily implementable new approach to thermodynamics laboratoryinstruction that directly addresses ABET Criterion b) an ability to design and conductexperiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data. In a traditional lab, students conductpreconfigured experiments based on established procedures. They then gather, analyze andinterpret data, and write reports. However, little is done to train engineering graduates to designexperiments for a specific purpose and without a prescribed procedure. However, engineeringprofessionals are frequently tasked with
classAbstract: A redesigned engineering math sequence was implemented from fall 2016 to spring2020, and the study focused on data collected during fall 2018 and spring 2019 from a singleclass with a sample size of 25. The results of the study suggest that the redesigned sequencepositively impacted students' material mastery, communication, collaboration, andmetacognition. Although the sample size was small, and the results were not statisticallysignificant, it was found that students' view of math and perception of their preparedness mayplay a role in their participation and how they interact with the material, with peers, and with theinstructor and TAs.Keywords: engineering math, Calculus, active learning, redesignIntroductionCore curriculum for
activities, and abbreviated social media arguments. However, upon graduation engineersneed to be able to interact and synthesize non-interactive sources like codes and design guides.Innovative practicing engineers are critical thinkers, actively synthesizing knowledge,constructively developing new solutions, and interactively engaging with various stakeholders.Engineering students will require coaching and teaching to develop their understanding the way © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023innovative engineers of all generations have: through reading, note-taking, problems solving,peer-interaction, and mentoring4. Engineering educators have a role in training students to usethese methods. Yet, many students are
Paper ID #37330Improving Engineering Transfer Student Onboarding andRetention through Scholarship and ProgrammaticInterventionsLesley Strawderman (Associate Professor)Mahnas Jean Mohammadi-Aragh Dr. M. Jean Mohammadi-Aragh is an associate professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Mississippi State University. Dr. Mohammadi-Aragh investigates the use of digital systems to measure and support engineering education. Current projects include leveraging writing to support programming skill development, using 3D weather visualizations to develop computational thinking skills for K-12 students
quality control measure following the “hands on” practical review of laboratorytechnicians mentioned above. In general the peer review process will help assure quality of thetextbook as well as providing legitimacy to the technical writings presented in the manuscript,something that is sometimes missing in OER content.After the peer review process is complete the manuscript in BETA version will be used as thetextbook for the laboratory portion of the soil mechanics course at City Tech for one semester.During the semester students will be encouraged to reflect, seek out and highlight errors,omissions, and provide general feedback on the manuscript before the final version is released tothe general public. 3. BudgetThe effort to produce a high
, 2006 MENTOR: Motivating ENgineers Through Organized RelationshipsIntroductionIn the fall semester of 2005 the First Year Engineering Program at North Carolina StateUniversity initiated a new and exciting mentoring program for all ~1200 of our first-semesterengineering students. MENTOR (Motivating ENgineers Through Organized Relationships) is aground breaking program in terms of its size and scope, whose aim is to increase student successin engineering through early connections to a positive peer network. The successes of mentoringprograms is widely documented in the literature, and indeed in the college of engineering at NCState we have two very successful mentoring programs aimed at women and minorities. Themotivation for initiating the
slides Journal Communication topics - writing skills, other speaking styles Week 3 The problem with Power Point... EA sample talk. Reflective Journal EA Purpose - TED Talks- Audiences Critique Session Week 4 Training-Content: Story & Engaging the Practice (Workshop) Reflective Journal Audience Organization & Analogies Week 5 Training-Visual Aids: Assertions Practice - Slides Reflective Journal Supporting Evidence Feedback Week 6 Training-Elocution: Poise & Elocution PRESENT 2 Presentation Training
, 2016). Peer debriefing will include fellowstudent researchers, faculty advisors, and peer-faculty group meetings. Peer debriefing works torelate one’s research conclusion to a peer more distant from the data to explore alternativeconclusions that may have been overlooked. Built-in probing interview questions and/orrespondent validation, in which the participant is asked to elaborate or confirm their position, isanother way to mitigate misconnections (Maxwell, 2013). In unforeseen situations wheretraditional knowledge may conflict with the research, community, traditional, and culturalsensitivities will be respected and supported.Memo writing is serving to track the analysis process which would support repeatability andprovide additional
Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering (BSEE) degree.The main objective of the ECE Scholars program was to increase the number of electricalengineering students graduating from Seattle University and entering the engineeringworkforce. Seattle ECE scholars received financial, academic, professional development, andcommunity building support to ensure their successful progression toward the BSEE degree.Student support services included peer tutoring, informal study partners, industry mentorshipprogram, professional development seminars, and social activities.In this paper, we discuss both the qualitative and quantitative results of this grant. We reporton the academic achievement of the scholars and their career choices after graduation. We
, Louisiana State University Adrienne Steele has over 15 years experience in STEM education. Currently, Adrienne works at Louisiana State University, managing all aspects of the STEP project that consists of a large-scale peer mentoring program in the College of Engineering. Previously, she founded and coordinated the Scope-On-A-Rope Outreach Program (SOAR) in the Department of Biological Sciences, where she worked for 10 years. Prior to her positions at LSU, Adrienne was the Science Education Curator at the Louisiana Art and Science Museum in Baton Rouge. Adrienne has a Master of Science degree in zoology from LSU, where she studied in the Museum of Natural Science collections, and an Education Specialist Certification in
and others that are not as successful. Projects thatincorporate small wins throughout the semester typically have better outcomes as students aremore engaged in the project from the start and build momentum as they progress toward the finalproject deliverables. An example of a project that works well in this regard is using data toidentify relevant metrics and using these metrics to create a tool. A Fall 2014 project involvedanalyzing the elements of customer payment tendencies that ultimately impact cash-on-hand.This required distinct phases that helped keep the team engaged in the project.Conversely, projects that require teams to conduct research among industry peers or competitorsare typically not successful. QUEST students do not have
, subject to areview of academic progress and financial eligibility. Some students were offered less than twoyears of support due to limited availability of project funds near the end of a grant period, and asmall number of students left the program.Activities. All S-STEM program activities were run or coordinated through the CoE’s EventsOffice with assistance from the Diversity Programs Office (DPO). The mission of the DPO is toprovide academic and non-academic support to increase enrollment, retention, and graduationamong under-represented minorities and women, but DPO services are available to all CoEstudents. The DPO collaborates with the university’s Learning Resource Center (LRC) toprovide academic support services and essay writing support