racial and ethnic groups: Indicator 24: STEM degrees. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/raceindicators/indicator_reg.asp[3] Adams, P., Delgado Solorzano, X., Lo, W., Gattis, C., & Popp, J. (2020, June). Closing the STEM Labor Gap through a Path to Graduation for Low Income, Rural Students. Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Online. 10.18260/1-2—34291[4] Gattis, C., Delgado Solorzano, X., Nix, D., Popp, J., Cleary, M., Lo, W., Hill, B., & Adams, P. (2019, June). Work in Progress: A Path to Graduation: Helping First-Year Low Income, Rural STEM Students Succeed. Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. 10.18260
Awareness and Adoption Rates in U.S. Engineering Departments,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 185–207, 2010, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01056.x.[11] T. L. Derting, D. Ebert-May, T. P. Henkel, J. M. Maher, B. Arnold, and H. A. Passmore, “Assessing faculty professional development in STEM higher education: Sustainability of outcomes,” Sci. Adv., vol. 2, no. 3, p. e1501422, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1501422.
, 2015[6] U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development,Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning; A Meta-Analysis and Review ofOnline Learning Studies. Washington, D.C., 2010.[7] J. L. Hess, & L. G. Kisselburgh, & C. B. Zoltowski, A. O. & Brightman, “The Developmentof Ethical Reasoning: A Comparison of Online versus Hybrid Delivery Modes of EthicsInstruction” Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans,Louisiana. 10.18260/p.26125, 2016[8] K. E. Holbert, “Comparison of Traditional Face-to-Face and Online Student Performance inTwo Online-Delivered Engineering Technical Electives” Paper presented at 2017 PacificSouthwest Section Meeting, Tempe
/2020.10.12.336230.[18] J. D. Dworkin, K. A. Linn, E. G. Teich, P. Zurn, R. T. Shinohara, and D. S. Bassett, “The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists,” Nature neuroscience, vol. 23, no. 8, Art. no. 8, 2020.[19] J. M. Fulvio, I. Akinnola, and B. R. Postle, “Gender (Im)balance in Citation Practices in Cognitive Neuroscience,” J Cogn Neurosci, vol. 33, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01643.[20] P. Chatterjee and R. M. Werner, “Gender disparity in citations in high-impact journal articles,” JAMA Network Open, vol. 4, no. 7, Art. no. 7, 2021.[21] P. Zurn, E. G. Teich, S. C. Simon, J. Z. Kim, and D. S. Bassett, “Supporting academic equity in physics through citation diversity,” Commun Phys
for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2021.[5] C. Bishop-Clark and B. Dietz-Uhler, Engaging in the scholarship of teaching and learning: A guide to the process, and how to develop a project from start to finish. Stylus Publishing, LLC, 2012.[6] L. Bosman, N. Duval-Couetil, and K. Jarr, "Mentoring Engineering Educators with an Entrepreneurial Mindset–Focused SOTL Professional Development Experience," in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022.[7] L. Bosman and K. Shirey, "Using Bio-Inspired Design and STEAM to Teach the Entrepreneurial Mindset to Engineers," in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022.[8] Bosman and Fernhaber, Teaching the Entrepreneurial
. 185-207, 2010.6. M. Devendorf, K. Lewis, T. W. Simpson, T. W. Stone, R. B. Stone, and W. C. Regil, "Evaluating the use of digital product repositories to enhance product dissection activities in the classroom," Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 9, 2010.7. Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education, R.M. Felder, L.K. Silverman, Engineering Education, 78(7), April 1988, pp 674-681.8. T. Gamdi and M. Watson, “BYOE: Advancing Petroleum Engineering Undergraduate Education Using Visualization Labs,” ASEE 2022 Annual Conference, 2022.Appendix A. Go-Kart Drivetrain for Fuel Consumption Calculation Off-Road Go Cart DrivetrainYou are building an off road go cart and the engine is connected to the
, E. Russell, Jr. Johnston and Brian Self (2015). Vector Mechanics for Engineers: Dynamics, 11th Ed. McGraw-Hill Education, P.O. Box 182605, Columbus, OH 43218, https://www.mheducation.com 12. Yunus A. Çengel, Michael A. Boles and Mehmet Kanoğlu (2019). Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach, 9th, Ed. McGraw-Hill Education, P.O. Box 182605, Columbus, OH 43218, https://www.mheducation.com 13. CANVAS LMS, website https://www.canvaslms.com, accessed on October, 15th, 2022. 14. Chen, B., West, M. and Zilles, C, (2018). “How much randomization is needed to deter collaborative cheating on asynchronous exams?” , Proceedings of the Fifth Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale, Article
: https://www.bls.gov/ooh/architecture-and- engineering/home.htm [Accessed February 1, 2023].[16] E. Ginzberg, S.W. Ginzberg, S. Axelrod, and J.L. Herma. “Occupational choice: An approach to a general theory”, New York: Columbia University Press, 1951.[17] L. V. Potts, A. Schmidt and R. Hale, “The great outdoors: Assisting student career choice in geomatics”, Surveying and Land Information Science, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 71-81, 2010.[18] G. Nugent, B. Barker, G. Welch, N. Grandgenett, C. Wu and C. Nelson, “A model of factors contributing to STEM learning and career orientation”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 1067-1088, 2015.[19] A. S. Kazi and A. Akhlaq, “Factors Affecting Students' Career Choice
://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fj42BvNDaFg[6]. D. Brandt and R. Kriegel, "Sacred cows make the best burgers," NY, USA: Warner Books, 1996.[7]. R.M. Marra and B. Bogue, "Women engineering students' self efficacy--a longitudinal multi-institution study,"Women in Engineering ProActive Network, 2006.[8]. T. Schmader, M. Johns, and M. Barquissau, "The costs of accepting gender differences: The role of stereotypeendorsement in women's experience in the math domain," Sex roles 50, no. 11, 2004, P.P. 835-850.[9]. L.K. Fiss, and D. Slade, "Reflecting on Culture in an Immersion Experience: How to Prepare Students for theUnexpected," presented in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022.BiographiesSARAH (YIN YIN) TAN is a research assistant professor in the
Publications, Inc, 2012.[17] E. Zerbe, G. M. Sallai, K. Shanachilubwa, and C. G. P. Berdanier, “Engineering graduate students' critical events as catalysts of attrition,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 868– 888, 2022.[18] B. A. Burt, “Toward a theory of engineering professional intentions: The role of research group experiences,” American Education Research Journal, vol. 56, ed. 2, pp. 289-332, 2019.[19] B. N. Böke, D. J. Mills, J. Mettler, and N. L. Heath, “Stress and coping patterns of university students,” Journal of College Student Development, vol. 60, ed. 1, pp. 85-103, 2019.[20] F. . D., Ampaw and A. J. Jaeger, “Completing the three stages of doctoral education: An event
numbers but also the mode of materialdelivery: in the middle of Spring 2020, all the CST classes were moved online. It has been reportedthat an “online learning environment can be effective but presents additional challenges withregard to academic integrity compared to in-person education” [4] [5]. Table 4 contains thestatistics regarding the CS1, CS2, and CS3 grades: how many students passed the class, how manystudents failed the class, how many students withdrew from the class, and what is the averagegrade. To compute the average grade across all the students who passed the class, we use thestandard letter grade to number conversion shown below: A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- D+ D
]. Landreman’s et al. [5] critical consciousness model in Figure 1 echoes Freire’s ideologiesbut moves from theory to action in two distinct phases. In phase one, four themes emerge inraising awareness critically: (a) “exposure to diversity”, (b) “critical incidents”, (c) “self-reflection”, and the (d) “aha moment” [5, p. 281]. Our exposure geographically or interactionswith people of diverse communities serves as the initial stage of raising awareness. Theconvergence of multifaceted dimensions of cultural identity prompts the realization of socialstratifications encircling race and gender, bias, and stereotypes [5]. Not including an invitationto reflect upon our position and how it is situated in society, culture, communities, and more in asocially
answers.During these visits, we had the opportunity to talk and interact with professionals involvedin the design and construction. We talk to the structural engineers design team and askedquestions as; a)what software you used to make the bridge model, b) how do you evaluatethe tension in the cables in the different stages of the bridge, construction, release offormwork, cable tensioning and short and long time use behaviour, c) how do you evaluatethe mobile loads (trucks and vehicles) acting over the bridge, and a lot more of these typeof questions. We also talk to construction workers such as welders, we asked them a) howcan you perform a quality job 180 ft above ground, b)how can you assure the quality inyour welded connections, c)what is the most
Paper ID #37342Talking Tech: How Language Variety in Engineering Curriculum InstructionCan Ease Delivery and Engage StudentsIngrid Scheel, Oregon State University Ingrid Scheel is a Project Instructor at Oregon State University. She works to teach from an integrated sociotechnical perspective in engineering science and design courses. Her focus is systems engineering and program management. Scheel has experience in small business strategic planning and risk assessment, designing and deploying fiber optic sensors and sensing systems, prototype development, instrumentation, data acquisition and analysis, and reporting
, andZimmerman outlines lesson ideas for AI and design thinking and project-based learning for STEM(Zimmerman 2018). Introductory AI books have been introduced at the middle and high schoollevel (Enz 2019a,b; Klepeis 2019b,a). In addition, there has been focus on teacher professionaldevelopment through workshops incorporating AI concepts into STEM classes for high schoolstudents (Lee and Perret, 2022).The primary challenge of introducing AI into K-12 levels is that few teachers have professionaltraining and experience to deliver such a curriculum. Most teachers will not have taken AI coursein their undergraduate/graduate training. Further, while there may be opportunities to introduce AIinto computer science education, integrating into core science
Paper ID #38939Character Development in the Engineering Classroom: An Exploratory,Mixed-Methods Investigation of Student Perspectives on CultivatingCharacterDr. Jessica Koehler, Wake Forest University Dr. Jessica Koehler is a Visiting Scholar of Leadership and Character for the Wake Forest Department of Engineering supporting with the development and assessment of character and ethics education in the engineering program.Dr. Olga Pierrakos, Wake Forest University Dr. Olga Pierrakos is Founding Chair and Professor of the new Department of Engineering at Wake Forest University - a private, liberal arts, research
Paper ID #37514Undergraduate students are the ”secret sauce” to help research programsbe successfulDr. Kenneth W. Van Treuren, Baylor University KEN VAN TREUREN is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Baylor Univer- sity and serves as the Associate Dean in the School of Engineering and Computer Science. He received his B. S. in Aeronautical Engineering from the USAF Academy in 1977 and his M. S. in Engineering from Princeton University in 1978. He completed his DPhil in Engineering Sciences at the University of Oxford, United Kingdom in 1994. He then taught at the USAF Academy until his military
Paper ID #38914Music, Coding, and Equity: An Exploration of Student and TeacherExperiences in Decoding Messaging and Discussing Equity with the ”YourVoice Is Power” CurriculumDr. Sunni Haag Newton, Georgia Institute of Technology Sunni Newton is currently a Senior Research Scientist at the Georgia Institute of Technology in the Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC). Her research focuses on assessing the implementation and outcomes of educatiRoxanne Moore, Georgia Institute of Technology Roxanne Moore is currently a Research Engineer at Georgia Tech with appointments in the school of
Thinking in Engineering Timeline(b) Design Tools 1 Timeline(c) Design Tools 2 TimelineFigure 2. Course-specific data collection timelines were developed for (a) IDTE, (b) DT1, and(c) DT2. The study survey was administered to the participants following the completion ofvarious assignments that incorporated the fabrication methods covered in the survey.2.4. Data AnalysisStatistical analysis was performed using JMP 17.0.0 (JMP Statistical Discovery LLC, Cary, NC).A p-value of 0.05 was considered to be significant for all tests. For tests that analyzed databetween/across courses, the third timepoint of DT2 was grouped with the fourth timepoint ofIDTE and DT1, as the data for these timepoints were collected at the end of the semester for eachcourse
investigatethe relationship between project performance and peer mentor rating.References[1] C. Gattis, B. Hill, and A. Lachowsky, “A Successful Engineering Peer Mentoring Program.”Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2007.[2] B.D. McPheron, “Work-In-Progress: Applying Peer Mentorship in a First Year EngineeringCourse to Improve Student Learning and Retention Outcomes.” Proceedings of the 2022 ASEEIL-IN Section Conference, 2022.[3] S.I. Donaldson, E.A. Ensher, and E.J. Grant-Vallone, “Longitudinal examination ofmentoring relationships on organizational commitment and citizenship behavior.” Journal ofCareer Development, 26(4): 233-249.[4] E.C. Voyles., R.K. Kowalchuk., J.W. Nicklow., R. Ricks, “Residential Peer Mentoring
-assessment-esema[9] R. Reck, K. Ansell, J. TerBush, C. Schmitz, J. Popovics, and H. Golecki, “Development of a Community of Practice for Rethinking Best Practices in Post-COVID Experiential Learning,” presented at the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Aug. 2022. Accessed: Feb. 13, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/development-of-a- community-of-practice-for-rethinking-best-practices-in-post-covid-experiential-learning[10] D. B. McCoach, R. K. Gable, and J. P. Madura, Instrument Development in the Affective Domain: School and Corporate Applications. New York, NY: Springer, 2013. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-7135-6.
Content Access, Virtual On line. 10.18260/1-2—35493[6] Cuiffi, J. D., & Wang, H., & Heim, J., & Anthony, B. W., & Kim, S., & Kim, D. D. (2021, July), Factory 4.0 Toolkit for Smart Manufacturing Training Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. https://peer.asee.org/37176[7] Ekong, J., & Chauhan, V., & Osedeme, J., & Niknam, S., & nguyen, R. (2022, August), A framework for Industry 4.0 workforce training through project-based and experiential learning approaches Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. https://peer.asee.org/40637[8] Kibira, D., Brundage, M. P., Feng, S., & Morris, K. C. (2017). Procedure for
, said thefollowing (paraphrased): The creation of ERASe was the single most valuable piece of my college experience. For me and my peers, college is a time to learn about yourself in a way that parallels academic studies. Engineering students face intense workloads; they cannot meet their full potential without proper time and stress management resources. Problem solving and creativity are core needs when studying engineering, and a healthy mindset is necessary to succeed.Student B, one of the first student members and second president of ERASe, stated that beforeERASe, she felt very alone in struggling. “Since no one really talks about mental health and how school specifically can affect
and PartialDifferential Equations (P2), and Probability and Statistics (P3). There is very little overlap inthe concepts taught in the three topics and hence, traditionally the course is taught by threeteachers in parallel during the year. P1 and P2 are both taught in the autumn term only whileP3 is taught in both autumn and spring terms. The course has several non-graded and gradedassignments during the year and a summative final exam in May [40]. The course notes areusually presented as three separate PDF files with differences in formatting. This study aimedto develop a uniform course book and explore the following key questions: a) What factors affect students’ level of engagement with a learning resource? b) How is students
Paper ID #38846Teaching Strategies in Industrial Engineering Programs in Brazil:Benchmarking in North American UniversitiesLaura Visintainer LermanMr. Italo Rodeghiero Neto, Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul PhD candidate in Industrial Engineering from the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Brazil. Master of Industrial Engineering from UFRGS (2020). His research mainly spans engineering education, ergonomics, human factors, and accessibility.Joana Siqueira de Souza, Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do SulDr. Maria Auxiliadora Cannarozzo Tinoco, Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul Maria A. Cannarozzo
Paper ID #36693Story-Driven Learning in Biomedical Engineering: Quantifying Empathy inthe Context of Prompts and PerceptionsDr. Stephanie Jill Lunn, Florida International University Stephanie Lunn is an Assistant Professor in the School of Universal Computing, Construction, and En- gineering Education (SUCCEED) and the STEM Transformation Institute at Florida International Uni- versity (FIU). She also has a secondary appointment in the Knight Foundation School of Computing and Information Sciences (KFSCIS). Previously, Dr. Lunn served as a postdoctoral fellow in the Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at
; Wittrock, M. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Complete edition). New York: Longman. 3. Boudhraaa, S., Dortaa, T., Milovanovic, J. and Pierinia, D. (2021). Co-ideation critique unfolded: an exploratory study of a codesign studio ‘crit’ based on the students’ experience CODESIGN VOL. 17, NO. 2, 119–138 https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2019.1572765 4. Fasli, M. and Hassanpour, B. (2017). Rotational critique system as a method of culture change in an architecture design studio: urban design studio as case study. Innovations in Education & Teaching International. Vol. 54 Issue 3, p194-205. 12p. 5. Gunday G., Gozde, C; and
at a level not seensince the Vietnam War era. Most of these veterans use the Post-9/11 GI Bill, an educationalassistance plan for eligible veterans, but many more programs are available to veterans andactive duty military members. This paper presents an overview of many of these educationassistance programs available to this growing population. With no end date for the Post-9/11 GIBill and the demand for engineering degrees in an increasingly technical job market, largenumbers of veterans will continue to enroll in higher education institutions. Likewise, active dutymilitary members will be part of the engineering education landscape to support the currentdemand for technical expertise in the military. Every student has different needs and
education,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 2012.[3] ASEE, “The Green report - Engineering education for a changing world,” 1994. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.12681/eadd/1834[4] ASEE, “Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering: Phase 1: Synthesizing and Integrating Industry Perspectives,” American Society for Engineering Education, Arlington, VA, 2013.[5] S. M. Katz, “The entry-level engineer: Problems in transition from student to professional,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 171–174, 1993.[6] S. A. Male, M. B. Bush, and E. S. Chapman, “Identification of competencies required by engineers graduating in Australia,” in Proceedings of the 2009 AaeE Conference, Adelaide, Australia, 2009
rate has increased steadily to 100% in Fall 2020, when the national pass rateshowed a plateau. After that, both the students' pass rate and national pass rate declined but ourstudents' pass rate is consistently higher than the national rate with a magnitude of at least 9%.From Fall 2018 to Fall 2022, about 45% of ME 416 students took the FE Exam.Appendix A shows the time history of students' performance in each topic area tested in the FEexam in Mechanical Engineering. Overall, students' performance in all areas is strong as all ofthem either met or partially met the expected achievement levels (details for one semester in fall2020 is presented in Appendix B). It proved the feasibility of our SDLMs across the wholespectrum of topics after