the Makerspace incompliance with state, federal, and NJIT regulations. The protocols put in place were directlyinfluenced by both the CDC guidelines [3-4] at the time of writing (August 2020), as well asNJIT’s COVID protocols for students, faculty, and staff in laboratory spaces [5]. In the creationof this protocol, the floor plan of the space and the user experience at each “station” wasconsidered. General behavioral rules were put into place for all individuals in the space that wereinformed by both CDC COVID-19 guidelines and NJIT’s COVID-19 protocols. The entirety ofthe NJIT Makerspace COVID protocol was determined via a sequential, hierarchical process,where: • The NJIT campus and laboratory-wide protocol and the CDC guidelines were
riskier or more time-intensive or expensive experimental situations.We certainly see value in the rich interactions that can occur in face-to-face experiments, and ourresults suggest future studies could investigate combinations of simulations and experiments. Forinstance, in future versions, we plan to study whether the simulations are more helpful as pre-labor post-lab activities that deliberately complement and extend the face-to-face experiments byexpanding the opportunity structure, providing them with greater agency to make decisions thatare consequential to their experimentation and interpretation, and attendant learning.Our study extends prior work on framing agency [17], suggesting that it is not bound only toengineering design settings
ofminterms (1-producing input terms) and maxterms (0-producing input terms). PETGUI providesa view of the minterms and maxterms of the function in a traditional KMAP view, howeverreduction steps of the KMAP are not integrated directly into the interface currently (planned forfuture work). Figure 3 shows the KMAP of the circuit function in Figure 1 as an example andillustrates how the minterm information (010, 100, 101) could be reduced into smaller forms(prime and essential prime implicants) with don’t care conditions (010, 10X). In practice,students could use the KMAP view as a basis to apply reductions and then check work usingessential prime implicants. Through third-party tool integration such as ABC and Espresso,PETGUI can also produce several
affiliatedwith National Public Radio.The report’s preface states that the intent of the document “centers on an effort to envision thefuture and to use that knowledge to attempt to predict the roles that engineers will play in thefuture.” The charge presented to the committee by the National Academy of Engineering’sCommittee on Engineering Education reads as follows:“1. Development of a vision for engineering and the work of the engineer in 2020.2. Examine engineering education and ask, ‘what it needs to do to prepare engineers for thefuture.’”The committee hosted a workshop during the fall of 2002. A strategic planning consultantmoderated the workshop and guided the 35 participants through four detailed scenarios. Thescenario-based discussion was used
objective of this course is to provide project-based learning (PBL) andintroduce these students to major projects in Civil, Mechanical, Electrical, and ComputerEngineering projects so that they can make an informed decision about their major. The PBL is anactive learning method that aims to engage students in acquiring knowledge and skills throughreal-world experiences and well-planned project activities in engineering disciplines. The coursecomprises four team-based unique projects related to Civil, Mechanical, Electrical, and ComputerEngineering. The project involves using a variety of engineering tools like AutoCAD, Multisim,and Arduino platforms. For the first time, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the hands-on project-based EGGN-100 course was
systematic research based on carefully designed survey questions for theexperimental and control groups are desired and planned for the future work. This sectionprovides more discussions and suggestions for future work.The initial development requires a major investment for successful implementation. The creationof accessible material and pre-recorded videos require considerable time and effort of theinstructor. An organized online course webpage is desirable to function as a course hub,accessible to instructors, TAs, and students. In the end, the whole re-design procedure took oneyear; planning meeting and workshop in Spring 2020, actual courseware preparation in Summer2020, and course administration in Fall 2020. This procedure was a group effort
make these projects seem more real andpurposeful to students.2 Despite struggling and expressing frustration with the open nature of theseprojects3,4, students involved in these open-ended projects reported greater enjoyment, increasedinterest, and increased learning through the open-ended projects4-9. In contrast, students who chosefrom a few strictly planned (predefined) projects expressed more dissatisfaction with their projectchoice than those completing open-ended projects8. This increased level of interest may havelongitudinal benefits, as students participating in open-ended projects have been shown to expressgreater interest in participating in new projects in the future8.First-year open ended design projects often include some form of
and thought-provoking curriculums for the engineering department at UC San Diego. My master’s degree background is aimed towards the field of medical technology, where I am able to work in a design laboratory that specializes in researching and developing medical devices. I plan to continue my education to obtain a Ph.D., directing my impact on engineering education and translational research at UC San Diego.Mr. Edward I Lan, University of California, San Diego Edward Lan earned his B.S in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California, San Diego in 2017. He moved on to work in the aerospace industry at Applied Composites San Diego (Formerly San Diego Composite) directly after graduating, developing new
) early accessto research in the field, (ii) active learning in the classroom to conduct scientific thinking withtheir peers, and (iii) participating in learning communities [6] / study groups to benefit from peerlearning and community building.Lichtenstein et al. [7] found that when students find the learning environment to be academicallysupportive and encouraging, they are more likely to respond with a stronger commitment to theiracademic pursuit and degree completion. Wilson et al. [8] include “academic advising,interventions, and individualized development plans” from faculty advisors as one of the keyfactors that helps students in STEM fields build confidence and stay in the major. Cromley etal. [9] discuss similar themes in their work on
researchers on the REDPAR team; in the third year of their RED grant, each teamis invited to participate in a follow-up focus group. Focus group discussions are conducted viavideo conference and/or telephone call and last for approximately 60 minutes each. This paperutilizes data from the second and third cohorts of RED teams’ baseline focus group discussions(n=12) and follow-up focus groups (n=13). The focus groups ranged in size from 2 to 10participants, with an average of 5 participants. Baseline focus groups were designed to gatherinformation on the initial stages of their change projects while follow-up focus groups discussedimplementation of their plans, adaptations that were made, and the skills utilized to createchange.Focus group transcripts
and undergraduate research experiences inform and influence college students’ career decisions and future plans. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, June 24-27.44. Trenor, J. M., Yu, S. L., Waight, C. L., Zerda, K. S., & Sha, T. L. (2008). The relations of ethnicity to female engineering students' educational experiences and college and career plans in an ethnically diverse learning environment. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(4), 449-465.45. Herkert, J. R. (2005). Ways of thinking about and teaching ethical problem solving: Microethics and macroethics in engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(3), 373-385.46. Cameron, K. S., &
specifically in search of courseimprovements. In that sense, whether a student preferred or learned more from the online orhands-on versions is not really a relevant question. In a very real sense, the results were that weran the course at all, especially during Spring 2020 when we were forced online halfway throughthe semester. Success! Given that, what are the lessons learned that we are sharing with thecommunity? Here is a summary of our qualitative recommendations as takeaways gleaned fromthis design intervention:1. Plan for pandemics. The first is obvious, but must be said. Given insufficient notice, takingany course online will be difficult, but the challenges with a hands-on design lab are particularlycomplex. It is possible that other
, sustainable infrastructure development, and material model development. He had been actively involved in planning, designing, supervising, and constructing many civil engineering projects, such as roads, storm drain systems, a $70 million water supply scheme which is comprised of treatment works, hydraulic mains, access roads, and auxiliary civil works. He had developed and opti- mized many highway design schemes and models. For example, his portfolio includes a cost-effective pavement design procedure based on a mechanistic approach, in contrast to popular empirical procedures. In addition, he had been equally engaged in the study of capacity loss and maintenance implications of local and state roads (a World Bank
immersive virtual reality approach can be used in caseswhere students need to experience surveying practices in higher detail and higher degree offidelity (e.g., complex terrains and city environments). Hopefully, further development of virtualreality hardware can reduce their cost, making accessible to wider audience. In other hand,enhanced 3D semantic virtual world information in the game-based tool will have promisingresult.Future work will focus on further developing the two software to include additional surveyingscenarios, functions, instruments, and environments. In addition, we plan in implementing bothsoftware to the same group of students, which will allow us to gain additional insights in thesynergies between game-based and immersive
valued in this story was… Willingness to Experiment, Grit and Perseverance, Planning and Efficiency Internal alignment/ Alignment with The experience I shared influenced my Confidence, Purpose, Belonging others sense of… Openness/ Reflectiveness Any decisions that were made in this Intuition, Self-Reflection, Feedback from story were influenced by… others Flexibility Thinking about the future, this story Embrace risk, Be willing to adapt, Rely on encourages me to… familiar ways of
, they lack control.[19] A high score in this index means that people feelthreatened by ambiguous or unknown conditions, while a low score shows that people do not getaltered by uncertainty and are not averse to taking risks. VSM comprehensive scores for the USMainland and PR are 46 and 38, respectively, with a mean score of 91.67.[19] Therefore, bothcountries show tendencies of pragmatic societies, where people can make their plans but do notget altered or anxious if their plans change. Furthermore, community members do not averse totake risks and embrace change and new ideas without problems.Our study showed a score of 43.09 for MSU versus a score of 0.17 for UPRM. Therefore, bothstudent populations are very pragmatic; thus, they can embrace
their eventual job choice and the process that lead them to that choice. The JobSearch Survey, distributed to Fellows 3-6 months after graduation, is focused on collecting datarelated to the following: a) how Fellow’s experience in their doctoral program influenced theircareer plans and decisions; b) how their experience as a Fellow in the H-AGEP program influencetheir career plans and decisions; c) what career options did they initially consider, did their careergoals change over time and if so, what factors influenced changes to those career decisions; andd) were academic careers at community colleges a consideration in those decisions. Three Fellowshave completed this survey so far, and we anticipate providing a richer analysis of the data
sizesbetween the different treatment groups. However, we still anticipate a slightly higher intent toremain in engineering for students in the improv intervention condition than students in either ofthe other two conditions.3.3.5 Retention in engineeringThe final outcome of interest is retention in engineering. We do not plan on measuring long-termretention in engineering. However, given the preceding outcomes and their connections to self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and interest in engineering, we expect that a student’s decision toremain in the field of engineering will be influenced indirectly by psychological safety and senseof belonging and directly by expectations of success and intent to remain in engineering.3.4 Potential moderating and
, because I'm not like a full-fledged engineer or anything. I did collect some dataand organize it for them. I also did a lot of plan production where the project was alreadydesigned but I would label it, set up the sheets, do the cross sections for the roads and other taskssimilar to that. I could tell the work I was doing actually mattered, it was not just assigned to meto occupy my time. My internship definitely improved my performance in engineering abilitiesjust because it really kind of helped show me the level of work that engineering has to be at -likethe level of detail and precision, how carefully everything gets done. I also learned a lot aboutengineering in general, the process of how a project develops and the quality of work that
key role in economic development on Long Island and in Stony Brook’s role as a co-manager of Brookhaven National Laboratory. McInnis most recently served as the executive vice president and provost for the University of Texas at Austin, a top public research university serving more than 50,000 students, where she acted as chief academic officer, led strategic planning for the university’s academic mission, and made significant advancements in equity, diversity, and inclusion initiatives. Prior to that, she American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Paper ID
laboratory, includingrenewable energy, environment, and manufacturing. The approach draws from studies of scientificcollaboration, student learning outcomes, and social network analysis. The lessons learned fromthis round of assessments will be used to improve the collaborative project.IntroductionThe primary aim of this paper is to present an online learning community for improvingcompetitiveness in the global green energy manufacturing environment, and for educating andtraining students who will form the future work force in the US manufacturing industry.“Globalization” is one of the main trends contemporary business organizations. Globallydistributed design, analysis, planning, manufacturing, and quality assurance facilities providecompetitive
. [16].Recommendations The variables that impact a project's complexity and successful prototype completionchange throughout the development life cycle. Complexity is an important issue at the beginningof the project when establishing features and requirements but becomes less prominent as theproject progresses. Complexity only becomes a constant problem when subjects do not clearlystate an appropriate work plan. Motivation and mindset are team-independent variables to assessbefore forming a team. These are variables inherent to an individual. Management should assessthese individual aspects before forming teams and determine the needs of each individual tomaintain a high level of motivation and an appropriate mindset throughout the
,stakeholders and the general public” in the post-survey. Two students did not include thecommunity as the stakeholder who approves of a company’s operations, and four more chose notto try to define the SLO in the pre-survey.All seventeen students had an advanced definition of SLO by the end of the course. One goodexample of advancing understanding is Student 231, whose pre-course definition did not includethe community at all, “A license that a business has to obtain to operate.” By the end of thecourse, they defined the SLO as “a verbal contract between a company and the community inwhich it plans to operate, allowing the company to conduct its business in that place.”Q10: How does a company best know it has a social license to operate?In responding
Engineeringcoordinated with the technical staff of the office of information technology to build a supportstructure for faculty members not experienced with online courses. Instructors were requested torevise their course syllabi and provide students with updated instructions related to participation,assignments deadlines, rescheduled exams, and established options for replacement of in-classexams and quizzes. The initial plan was to allow the institution to develop safe methods ofinstruction, so that the students, faculty, and staff can resume operation on campus. However, due tothe rapid spread of COVID-19 and the sharp increase in the number of infections, the universityabandoned the plan for resuming face-to-face instruction for the second half of the
some of the positive aspectsand what could be improved. The setup is well suited for the pandemic when all classes had tobe held remotely. There is work planned to gather more extensive feedback from students tofurther study the learning impact of this course.The author of this paper will be very glad to share the resources (PowerPoint slide deck,worksheets, experiment writeup, quizzes, projects, instructions videos etc.) developed with anyfaculty that wants to adopt the course on their university. (Please contactrungun.nathan@yahoo.com).References1. Arsenault, J., et al. “Integration of sensors into secondary school classrooms” in Frontiers in Education, 2005. FIE '05. Proceedings 35th Annual Conference. 2005.2. Mahonen, P., E. Meshkova
library and information science education in response to the rising demand for data professionals[7]. Chu et al (2017) proposed that iSchools should make contributions based on the traditional andmodern advantages of data science-related fields, such as information organization and access,information management, information preservation, and information science research. Experts candiscuss and establish a more precise definition, scope and data flow of data science. Compile a listof fundamental principles, skills, and toolsets necessary for data scientists to help current and futureinformation experts assess their level and find courses and programs that suit their level, interests,and career plans. In order to improve the quality and
concrete, while his engineering education research interests focus on experiential learning at both the university and K-12 levels. Dr. Carroll is the chair of ACI Com- mittee S802 - Teaching Methods and Educational Materials and he has been formally engaged in K-12 engineering education for nearly ten years.Dr. Matthew D. Lovell P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Matthew Lovell is an Associate Professor in the Civil Engineering Department at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, and he currently serves as the Interim Senior Director of Institutional Research, Plan- ning, and Assessment office. He is also serving as the director of the Making Academic Change Happen (MACH) program. He received his Ph.D. from Purdue
presents an evidence-based study on adesign review’s ability to (1) enhance learning opportunities for engineering students, (2)improve the effectiveness of a team whose members are of different engineering sub-disciplines,(3) improve the ability to communicate clearly and effectively with a range of audiences, and (4)improve the ability to solve complex engineering problems. In this context, complex engineeringproblems can be defined as “complex, ill-formed, and open-ended problems which fostersflexible thinking and supports intrinsic motivation” [1]. Additional outcomes of the studyincluded identifying plans for future design review iterations. This study encompasses thegeneration, implementation, and analysis of the design review process in
ActiveExperimentation and Concrete Experience [2]. Also, developing and conducting experimentsare part of the ABET accreditation outcomes, which can most effectively be addressed throughdirect, hands-on experimentation [3]. Furthermore, some research has shown that online-onlycourses can suffer from a lack of application-based learning, particularly for laboratory skills [4].In the Summer term of 2020 at The University of Pittsburgh, Mechanical Measurements 2, asenior-level undergraduate mechanical engineering course focusing on experimental methodsand data analysis, was taught fully online instead of in-person. The goals of this course are toteach students about ABET outcomes 1-3, 5, and 6: experimental planning and design,interpreting data by selecting
accommodate projects with local industry partners inaddition to student prints. Projects with industry partners were given top priority, which meantthat sometimes students had to wait weeks to get a part printed, and sometimes it was difficult orimpossible for the students to find a time to meet with the staff at Innovation Commons toobserve the setup of their designs and ask questions about the machines. The development ofthis course was planned in conjunction with the staff at Innovation Commons; however, theincreased workload on their staff and the increased usage of their machines quicky becauseburdensome. This format was also incredibly time consuming for the instructors running thecourse. The instructors found themselves spending many hours in