University Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning.[35] Simmons, D. R. & Ye, Y., Hunsu, N. J. & Adesope, O. O. (2017). Development of a Survey to Explore Out-of-Class Engagement of Engineering Students. International Journal of Engineering Education, 33(4), 1213-1221.[36] Lashari, T. A., Alias, M., Akasah, Z. A., & Kesot, m. J. (2012). An Affective-Cognitive Teaching and Learning Framework in Engineering Education. ASEAN. Journal of Engineering Education, 1(1), 11-24.[37] Simmons, D. R. & Yu, R. (2015). Conducting a Q Study to Refine and Develop New Measures of Engineering Student Co-Curricular Involvement. Research in Engineering Education Symposium. Dublin, Ireland.[38] Simmons, D
could serve with their scientific knowledge. They attended several volunteer board meetings and familiarized themselves with the organization and then decided to help create curriculum for the food based summer youth program that is hosted by the food bank. Kids spend time working in the community garden and then learn to prepare some of the food that they are growing. While it is cooking, they then play a game or do some other activity related to that food. The students created eight lessons plans based around different vegetables. Self-Help International - Students worked on a two part project with a local nonprofit that serves communities overseas with a variety of initiatives. In the first
] and “depoliticization” (relegation of questions of social justice and inclusion as“political,” and thus irrelevant to “real” engineering) [39, 40].This project used a mixed-methods research plan with surveys of engineering deans, faculty andstudents as well as ethnographic participant observations of a Virtual Community of Practice forLGBTQ inclusion in STEM. The surveys and ethnographic research generated new knowledgeand understanding of engineering cultures, which provided empirically grounded ways that thenext Safe Zone workshops were contoured to be most effective for engineering audiences. Theresearch findings help the members of the Virtual Community of Practice advocate moreeffectively as they try to promote LGBTQ equality in their
andtheir mentors.A wide variety of mentoring topics have been analyzed in previous studies more specific toengineering and STEM subjects, and consideration of earlier literature reinforced the potential ofour trial to contribute to the experiences of undergraduate students. Research has explored thebenefits for young women of mentoring them into STEM subjects [9], the role of mentors inraising young women’s persistence [10] and their retention in engineering disciplines at a higherlevel [11]. A positive impact on career planning in STEM disciplines has also been found forstudents with disabilities [12]. Undergraduate students can mentor other students consideringentering the industry post-school [13] as well as their undergraduate peers [14
, and the TEAMS Program at the University of Boulder. Dr. Rivale’s research uses recent advances in our understanding of how people learn to evaluate and im- prove student learning in college and K-12 engineering classrooms. Her work also focuses on improving access and equity for women and students of color in STEM fields.Hannah Smith Brooks, University of Texas, Austin Hannah Brooks is a doctoral student at the University of Texas at Austin. Her research focuses on promot- ing equitable access through collaboration and instructional design. She is also interested in improving teacher education programs in the sciences by studying how teachers plan and structure learning using various methods. She has a BA in
professors’ clarifications about theMuddiest Points directly improved their learning, showed their professors cared, andenhanced their overall relationship with their professors. The exercise was also popularamongst professors; several planned to include the exercise in their future courses. InIntroductory Materials courses, Krause and colleagues8,9 found the use of Muddiest Pointactivities informed instructors’ use of formative process feedback and improved studentattitudes, achievement and retention of course content.Most Surprised activities are rarely used in engineering, but have been used by instructorsin other fields in a way similar to Muddiest Point. In the most common form reported inthe literature, Most Surprised is posed as one question
barriers toengineering and other careers in the physical sciences continue to deter women from enteringthose careers.History textbooks are good indicators of how well social knowledge is transmitted to youngergenerations and, according to Jane Gaskell 11,12, textbooks from the first wave rarely includedreferences to women’s experiences . The early feminists attempted to initiate changes to thecurriculum in their role as teachers, setting lesson plans and writing texts to introduce students toissues relevant to life in the home and building a foundation for – or maybe driving – the secondwave of feminism 13–18. Coinciding with racial activism, the second wave was replete withmilitant affirmative action 19, which alienated some from the growing
like this were very uncommon, however. This could point to a missing link withrespect to developing a professional sense of social responsibility in engineers that could drawfrom the existing HSS influences that students reported. One student actually discussed howtheir humanities class influenced them negatively with respect to their views of engineering,saying: “Mostly the humanities, the engineering classes I took made me realize how irrelevant my major (mechanical engineering) is to making a difference in the world. I don't plan on using my major for anything in the future- planning on shifting my career path to the humanities/social sciences.”This response came from a female, senior engineering student who
individual basis, whereas the ProLab activities,laboratory exercises, and homework assignments were designed for groups of two to fourstudents.Based on the pedagogical design, the instructor had to completely redesign the detailedlecture/exercise plans for each week. The instructor’s theory presentations had to be modifiedquite drastically from the lecture slides for traditional classroom lectures to material supporting Page 26.1750.6active learning. The theoretical material was divided into three categories: simple enough forstudents’ self-study and quizzes prior to ProLab-sessions, theory/modeling techniquepresentations with short theory tasks for
discussion that her group memberswent through in arriving at their final positions and the evolution of her own thinking as the dis-cussion progressed, possibly in preparation for the final exam in the course; andd) Allowing the instructor to assess how effective the initial multiple-choice question was in en-abling the formation of heterogeneous groups as well as how effective the discussions in the groupswere in helping students develop deep understanding of the underlying concepts by looking at thesummaries of the discussions submitted by the various students in the class.We conclude with a mention of our plans for future work. We are currently implementing therevised version of the CONSIDER tool. Once it is complete, we plan to test it in a
Resistor SetC. Implementation Plan and DiscussionThe assignments have been made a permanent part of the circuit analysis laboratory in ECE atMissouri University of Science and Technology14. Student performance, student comments, andinstructor observations will be used to modify the assignments for effectiveness. In particular,the laboratory reports have been selected as measures for the department assessment planregarding ABET outcomes b) and k). For instance, the student grades on the Resistive Networksreports will address the criteria for outcome b) to organize and interpret laboratory data with agoal of having a median score on this selected assignment of 80 percent or more.This laboratory implementation provides an early basic introduction to
interrupting and talking over eachother, at three minutes they begin to build a conversation.Speaker A: How many pellets do we want to make, because she said it was like uh five grams.Speaker B: No, because we are not going to do just one pellet so we are definitely going to need controlsand stuffSpeaker A: Yeah that's trueSpeaker C: For the 0.6 it says about 1g?Speaker D: How expensive were the dopants?At six minutesSpeaker B : So should we plan to do like 3 pellets per thing so that we have uh error bars?Speaker A: Yeah that would be goodSpeaker D: Yeah I think 3 or fiveSpeaker B : Wait, point 3 or moreSpeaker D, A, B: YeahSpeaker A: So which, so whichSpeaker D: interrupting - 9 pelletsSpeaker A: 9 pellets?Speaker A, C, B: Three, three three dopants
development in the performance oftheir professional duties,”16 representing a distinct departure from the prior “rape and pillage”mentality of land developers or the planned obsolescence built into electronic gadgetry, whichhas spawned mountains of electronic waste. Again, numerous resources are available on thisvery contemporary topic, including a number located on university websites. Vanderbilt’s Centerfor Teaching, for example, includes a wealth of information on sustainability and teaching tips,along with links to other sources.17 Proceedings of the 2019 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2019, American Society for Engineering Education
studentspitfalls more than once. Building on the testing design in the learn from their challenges and failures.previous phase, the students also write a testing plan, build atest suite, and ensure that their project passes the tests. 3.3 Post-Course Survey Finalizing. Finally, with the project completed, the students For the first offering of the course, the students did a post-write their own tutorial, in the format of the tutorials used course survey using a generic course feedback form, whichthroughout the course. The goal of this tutorial is, on one hand, asks questions about the students’ satisfaction with the courseto document what the students did for
12.264.7Appendix 1: Sample AssignmentAssignment: Ballistic Expose 4 CompetitionFor this assignment, you will be entering the Ballistic Expose 4 Competition. Please review thewebsite for Call for Entries information.http://www.ballisticpublishing.com/books/expose4/In this assignment you will follow the competition guidelines and you will be graded not only onthe aesthetic and technical quality of your work, but on how well you follow the instructions forentry and other competition guidelines.The illustration must communicate a story, message or concept.Both creative and technical aspects of this project will be assessed.This project will run concurrently with other projects, so plan your time accordingly.Tue. Jan. 24 Sketches and Concept
part of NSBE’s mission: “To increase the number of … engineerswho excel academically”. The Stratus Mentoring Program utilized a systematic mentoring modelfor its operation as opposed to an informal arrangement between potential mentors and protégés(See Figure Below). Page 12.1072.6 Stratus Mentoring Program Model PLANNING STRUCTURE ASSESMENT • Planning – Recruitment & Training – Goal Setting – Weekly
comparison to be made at this time. Page 12.1532.11Indirect assessment of student learning is accomplished through online course objective surveysthat question students on their ability to complete course objectives. Overall student satisfactionwith the course and the instructor is through the end of the term course evaluations administeredby the dean’s office. Finally, the effectiveness of the hybrid component of the course is throughan online survey that questions the students about the hybrid components of the course as well asthrough informal focus groups during the last course meeting.The author is aware of the limitations of this assessment plan
model, using her academic background to solve practical problems and using her problem solving experiences to enhance her teaching. She has received an award for excellence in service learning. Professor Amel has specific expertise developing assessment plans and dissemination approaches through her work on the UST Bush Foundation Grant. She has completed pedagogical presentations and publications about international education and service learning.Camille George, University of St. Thomas Dr. George is an Assistant Professor in mechanical engineering at the University of St. Thomas. She teaches the core course in thermodynamics and has received outstanding student evaluations on her
Christopher B. Smitherman is an undergraduate honors student in mechanical engineering at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Mr. Smitherman plans to finish his B.S. degree in December 2007 and plans to pursue an MBA after graduation. He is a member of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Tau Beta Pi, and Pi Tau Sigma. Page 12.1040.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 MathCAD Functions for the Thermodynamics Properties of Moist Air, Ammonia, Propane, and R-22AbstractMathCAD functions were constructed to evaluate the thermodynamic properties of moist air,ammonia, propane
. Page 13.1048.4We use a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods to examine transfer in the contextof problem solving. The participants in this study were students enrolled in a second-semesterphysics course taken by future engineers and physicists, calculus instructors and physicsinstructors. A total of 416 students’ exam sheets were collected and reviewed. Statisticalmethods were used to analyze the quantitative data. A total of 28 students and nine instructorswere interviewed. The video and audio recordings were transcribed and analyzed in light of theaforementioned theoretical framework.A three-phase research plan was used in this study. Phase I was designed to assess horizontaltransfer of knowledge using traditional physics
novices: graduate engineersin the first few years of their career.Need for a longitudinal studyA longitudinal study of one or more cohorts of engineering graduates could provide usefulinsight on these issues.An extensive literature search revealed five recent longitudinal studies of engineeringgraduates12-16.Sheppard et al12 are undertaking an interdisciplinary longitudinal study of the engineeringstudent experience using several research approaches. As part of their study they plan to followthe transition to the workforce of some of the 48 participants as they move from “the end of theirjunior year through their first two years post-B.S. With this cohort, we will focus on the criticaltransition from undergraduate education to either the
on the last day of classes. A standardengineering report format includes a) a cover sheet, b) an abstract (executive summary), c) anintroduction (should include a statement of objectives, as well as salient information to bring thereader up to speed), d) the body of the report: methods, analysis, results, etc., e) conclusions, andf) appendices (such as: calculations, data tables, computer programs, etc.). Each group willpresent its design report orally. Each of these presentations (approx. 15 minutes) is scheduledduring the final examination week. Every group member must participate in this oralpresentation. Additionally, a design exposition is planned during the final examination week.Participation is mandatory in both of these events.6
working in groups while executing a task relative to engineering. The students were instructed to design and construct a free- standing structure to the maximum height possible while minimizing total cost. At the beginning of the activity each team was given a bag of assorted Tinker Toys which they were not allowed to open. The teams were then given 20 minutes to design and plan their structures (without using the materials), and only 3 minutes for construction.Week 2: The Engineering MethodOn October 18, a Chief Scientist of Space Systems at Northrop Grumman delivered apresentation on the engineering method. The speaker emphasized the importance of planningthroughout the entire engineering process and included
) Large Public University (LPU), a large public university in the NorthwestU.S.; and D) Suburban Private University (SPU), a medium-sized private university on the WestCoast.Including students from diverse backgrounds was a key element of the research plan. For thiscohort of students, special attention was paid to understanding how underrepresented studentsnavigate their initial years in engineering education. This was accomplished by employing over-sampling strategies for gender (male/female) and underrepresented minorities (AfricanAmericans, Native Americans, Mexican Americans, Puerto Ricans, other Latino groups) in orderto gain information about a broader range of students.This mixed method study, sponsored by the National Science Foundation
studentscombined with the challenge of participating in international programs without the risk ofdeferring graduation. In this paper, we propose a programmatic model geared specificallytowards engineering students: the short-term experiential program abroad. This model featuresan academic course which presents a technical subject within a global context, coupled with anintensive ten day to two week intensive study abroad experience that provides first-hand insightsthrough site visits to corporations and academic institutions, lectures, and planned interactionswith both international and host country students.Short-Term Experiential Program DesignExperiential education programs and short-term study abroad courses are becoming particularlycommon ways for
engaged in activities that leverage all areas of teaching, scholarship and service.One specific example is the Printery Building in Atascadero, California. The faculty memberwas the lead engineer for assessing the damage and developing the rehabilitation plan for thishistoric structure that was damaged in the 2003 San Simeon earthquake. As a result of this effort,he was able to use this project as a case study in his ARCE 448 Seismic Rehabilitation courseand he arranged several site visits for the students. The faculty member also served as facultyadvisor for undergraduate senior projects on the same topic. In addition, he serves as the Chairof the Structural Engineering Institute Design Practices Committee.A second faculty member has also
universities will necessarily have different challenges than small private colleges.Whether large or small, public or private, elite or more mainstream, each type of institution canbring something to the discussion. Therefore, when planning panel discussions andpresentations, care should be taken to include representatives from a range of institutions. Page 13.977.9Finally, much of the best engagement in a dialogue-focused workshop occurs outside of theorganized sessions; it occurs at meals, informally in the hallways, and when milling aroundbetween sessions. Thus, such a workshop should leave plenty of time for the participants to talkwith each other
the sophomore design course, studentsurveys, and student anecdotal evidence for making changes to the course content. As we moveforward with our assessment plan, an increase emphasis will be placed on how the sequence ofdesign courses meet each of the programs expected outcomes related to student mastery ofdesign. In addition to continuing the instructor’s self assessment of the sophomore designcourse, we will be surveying the capstone senior design project technical mentors on thestudents’ preparation on applying the design methodology at the beginning of their capstoneproject. (Technical mentors are either practicing engineers or faculty members depending uponthe engineering program.) This feedback will then be incorporated into the
inputs and boundary conditions1, 2. A virtualfacility can have two purposes: a) to facilitate the feasibility study of an engineering systemwhile in the planning stage, and based on the study, designers can adjust the parameters duringtheir final planning so the anticipated system can serve its purpose and b) to study the behaviorand control of a complex engineering system for educational and research purposes withoutbuilding the system. The development of these virtual facilities can involve expertise withcomplex mathematical solutions with tedious software developments and effective graphical userinterface 3. Considering the level of involvement, sometimes it is difficult for an individualinstitution to develop and maintain such