. Social responsibility, v. Ethical issues, and vi. Diversity/Community values. 6. To introduce technical material not covered in coursework. Selection of Design Teams and Management. The senior class is split into independentdesign teams (typically there are 6 to 7 students per team). Teams are encouraged to operate asan engineering consulting firm. Each team is led by a project manager and a deputy projectmanager who are responsible for the deliverables. An effort is made to have at least one studentin each team from each of the specialty areas (structures, geotechnical, transportation,construction, and environmental). All students before the end of their junior year are required tocomplete an online form documenting
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 Figure 12: LSA and LDA Ten Topic Extraction for 1995-1999.The six topic extraction for the 1995-1999 also show distance learning and informationtechnology to play a role in this period. LDA extracted Distance Project Courses while LSAextracted Distance Technologies. Both methods extracted project based design as LDA extractedDistance Project Courses and LSA extracted Project Design/Computers. Traditionalengineering training was demonstrated by LDA extracting Design Courses/Assessment whileLSA extracting University Courses, Teaching Techniques, Technologies/Environment. Othertopics of interest observed were Reliability Engineering, emphasis on environment consideration,and ethics. The results are illustrated in Figure
Big Beam 8.1% 5.5 10 Mead Ethics Paper 5.4% 12 25 Timber Bridge 2.7% 10 15 EERI Student Design 2.7% 6 8 Geo Challenge 1.4% 6 6 ASC Design Build & Commercial 1.4% 7 7 ASCE Indiana Section Senior Design 1.4% 18 18 ITE Traffic Bowl 1.4% 10 10 AWWA/WEF Wastewater Design 1.4% 5 5The program head
as well as to improvethe course itself and the program curriculum as a whole. The techniques include ‚ an initial survey of achievement vs. importance of all outcomes, ‚ an individual self-assessment assignment, ‚ a project-specific statement of ABET concerns (health, safety, environmental, ethical, etc.), ‚ student assessment of team functioning, ‚ peer assessment for design reviews, ‚ an assignment to discuss current events related to professionalism and ABET concerns, ‚ a small group assessment (over the entire program curriculum), ‚ an exit survey for achievement of all outcomes, and ‚ peer assessment of project final presentations.Examples of assessment
: Designing for the Future of the Field convey it succinctly: “Becauseengineers’ work directly affects the world, engineers must be able and willing to thinkabout their ethical responsibility for the consequences of their inventions in anincreasingly interlinked world environment”5.In the centennial issue of the Journal of Engineering Education (Jan 2011), an essay onhow to engage future engineers suggests, “engineering education has a funny, maybeeven neglectful relationship to people” and there is a call to re-imagine engineeringeducation as something more “socio-technical”6. Rigorous engineering educationresearch is needed to advance fundamental understanding of the nature of today’sincreasingly socio-technical engineering work, as well as
Paper ID #9937Leadership in Multidisciplinary Project Teams: Investigating the emergentnature of leadership in an engineering education contextMegan Kenny Feister, Purdue University Megan K. Feister is a doctoral candidate in the Brian Lamb School of Communication at Purdue Uni- versity. Her research focuses on organizational identity and socialization, team communication, ethical reasoning development and assessment, and innovation and design. Megan holds a B.A. in communica- tion from Saint Louis University and a M.A. in Organizational Communication from the University of Cincinnati.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue
facts and ideas. The public for whom it is intended is generally competent to manage such discourse.” 1310. Expectation of high grades, motivationMany students have an expectation of higher grades without a corresponding effort.Students are often prepared in high school to expect high grades with little homework andmodest effort. “Grade inflation”, experienced in grades K-1214, and now shown to beevident in universities15,16,17accelerates this tendency over time. This accompanies a“consumer” mentality, which works against the idea of the university as a community oflearners. There is a lower incidence of work ethic, a lower motivation to learn, and thetendency to cheat is higher18. As a logical consequence of all these traits
and for use assenior electives. The Center for Biological and Environmental Nanotechnology (Rice) has developed anumber of interdisciplinary graduate-level science courses, including “Science Policy and Ethics;”1 newmasters programs in Nanoscale Physics, Environmental Analysis and Decision Making, and SubsurfaceGeoscience2,3; undergraduate courses such “Nanotechnology: Content and Context;” undergraduatemodules4; and modifications to existing senior and graduate-level courses5,6. While the Center forIntegrated Nanopatterning and Detection Technologies’s website7 (Northwestern) lists no courses, a Page 10.1365.2number of courses with
Research Traineeship (IGERT) program; inclusion of freshman and non-engineering students; effective inter-college participation; strong ethics component; timelyprogram evaluation; technical papers competition; and financial support to present a subsequentpaper at a regional or national meeting. Metrics of the program’s effectiveness along withstudent evaluations and comments on the program are also given.1. Introduction1.1 The NSF REU Program:The goal of the NSF REU program is “…to expand student participation in all kinds of research− whether disciplinary, interdisciplinary, or educational in focus − encompassing efforts byindividual investigators groups, centers, national facilities and others.” 1 The NSF REUprogram has two components
. To prepare students to think Christianly and act ethically in providing services to their employers, communities, churches and humanities. 4. To foster an instructional environment that promotes engineering design skills and inventive thinking. Page 9.379.5Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering From the perspective of (please check one) Community Graduate Corporation
predominantly by a highly structured, systematic method of peer evaluation thatemphasizes ethical behavior by members of the team. In the past, peer evaluation has beenavoided due to the inherent problems of students grading other students. However, the solutionprovided in this paper is fair and has been proven very successful. Peer evaluation is especiallyuseful and informative because the actual team members themselves know best the contributionsof each individual member of the team.This paper presents a brief review of suggestions for topics to improve the teaching of teamwork.The primary emphasis of the paper is to present a successful method of assessing individualcontributions to a team. The basis for implementing the teamwork and associated
Center Director. His pioneering work in the areas of biodiesel, fuel cells and other renewable strategies and technologies is widely recognized in Puerto Rico. His annual research funding is approximately $175,000 mostly from Federal Agencies (DOE, DHS) and Sloan Foundation.Prof. Efrain O’Neill-Carrillo, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagez Efran O’Neill-Carrillo is a professor of power engineering at the University of Puerto Rico, Mayagez (UPRM). He holds a Ph.D. (Arizona State), an M.S.E.E. (Purdue), and a B.S.E.E. (UPRM). His profes- sional interests include energy policy, sustainable energy, distributed generation, power quality, social and ethical implications of engineering, and technology. He has authored or co
technical and professional skills ofengineering students through the outcomes common to all engineering programs; six of eleven ofthese relate to professional skills such as communication skills, team skills, and an understandingof the societal and ethical aspects of engineering.One very difficult question facing engineering programs today is how to meet these highexpectations without increasing credit hours or overburdening students with unrealisticworkloads. Individual faculty as well must come to grips with their personal approaches tomeeting these expectations. What is described in this paper is one approach to achieving thesimultaneous development of the professional and technical skills by allowing students topractice these skills in an
research interest in engineering education. Her technical expertise is computational intelligence and digital systems. Primary engineering education work includes infusing ethics into computing courses and enhancing transferable skills through active and universal design for learning methods. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Educational Infographics, A Review PaperAbstractThis paper endeavors to inspire educators and instructional designers to more fully embraceinfographics, leveraging their unique capabilities to enrich the teaching and learning landscape andprepare students for an increasingly visual world. To inspire, this review seeks to offer a coherentframework
[1], it is paramountfor engineering education to grow into a more inclusive and innovative practice to fulfill societalneeds. While some progress has been made in introducing innovation during the first and fourthyears of undergraduate education, the middle two years, burdened with core engineering courses,have seen limited change [2]. As we re-develop these courses, integrating “innovativeentrepreneurship” in parallel with social ethics and EDI could be a great catalyst for positivechange. Literature has shown its inclusive impact on the job market [3] and the economies ofnations [4]. Education based on an entrepreneurial mindset relies on collaborations acrossdisciplines, effective group work and productive communication [5], all pillars
challenges of using this AI-based model are discussed, as well asthe ethical and social issues that arise from its implementation. Suggestions andrecommendations for future research and practice in this emerging and interdisciplinary field arerequested as this study will contribute to advancing knowledge and innovation in STEMeducation and inspire more researchers and educators to explore the potential of AI and CV inenhancing teaching and learning.Literature ReviewAs Lombardi et al [8] described, active learning is a broad term among educators. They assertedthat the existing comprehension from the literature on active learning is excessively broad andlacks precise particulars, impeding the ability to conduct effective research and enhance
Colleges of Agriculture andLife Sciences, Textiles, Management, Design, and Natural Resources). The earliest of theseprograms were founded in the mid 1980s and early 1990s in order to enable “graduates who areknowledgeable not only in technology and science, but also in human affairs.” [4] The FranklinProgram, which accepted its first “cohort” of students in 1990, is the largest and second oldest ofthe dual-degree programs. Its goal is the “integration of engineering, the humanities, and socialsciences throughout the program [to develop] the students' technical skills and ethical, historical,political, and economic insights which are so essential to the conduct of national and globalaffairs.” [5]C. Relationship of Program to Overall Mission of the
and mission. Whilethe Mission statement is valid for the institution, the Student Oriented Objectives aredefined for each of the programs within this institution. Below you can see the StudentOriented Objectives of the Computer Science and Computer Engineering Programs of theSchool of Engineering: CpE Program 1. Students will be proficient in designing hardware, software and a variety of computer-controlled engineering systems. (Program Outcomes 1,2,3,4,5) 2. Students will develop an understanding of contemporary global and societal issues, ethical considerations and communication skills, both oral and written. (Program Outcomes 8,11,12) 3. Student will develop abilities in applying mathematical and scientific
]. Specifically, graduates from an engineering program leave with the overallimpression that engineering decisions made in the real world are completely objective and without bias.General consensus in the field firmly believes that engineering and science can be separated from politicaland social concerns as long as “rigorous” engineering and scientific methods of design and inquiry arefollowed. But if we consider some recent history of engineering, we find many examples and exceptionsthat disprove this supposed neutrality rule [18-20]. From the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster [21] to theVolkswagen “Dieselgate” scandal [22] to Democratic Republic of Congo conflict minerals ethics [23] toCOVID-19 vaccinations [24], decisions regarding and perceptions of
, professionals must be able to think “outside of the box” and fully understand thesituation at hand. Third, engineering is the bridge between science and business, and assuch, students must have both a technical education and an understanding of theeconomic and management issues facing their field. And finally, a security professionalmust have a clear understanding of the legal and ethical issues that they are going to befacing and dealing with on a day to day basis.The courses in the security program are designed to provide the skill set demanded forsecurity professionals in industry today. In order to assure that this is the case, thematerial covered in our courses is constantly compared to the various independentassessment tools and certifications
engineering epistemology. Her work is inspired by Making and tinkering practices, especially those from different local knowledge systems. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Augmented Reality for Sustainable Collaborative DesignMs. Eunice KangEunice Kang is an undergraduate student at Boston College studying international studies with aconcentration in ethics and social justice as well as a minor in computer science. She is aresearch assistant in Dr. Avneet Hira’s HER lab.Dr. Shulong YanShulong Yan is a Postdoctoral Research Fellow in the Human-Centered Engineering program atBoston College. Her research focuses on
: foundation in: engineering ethical codes and identifying academic and processes of engineering creeds research career opportunities design, innovation, invention, and assessing the benefits of and entrepreneurship pursuing graduate degrees exploring ideas of identifying current methods to determine engineering career engineering research customer needs and obtaining opportunities and factors that activities at USF and best continuous feedback will influence individual practices preferences formulating short and long- enhancing technical skills by using stakeholder
Engineering Education [1]–[3]. Theseorganizations advocate for engineering programs to incorporate the development of skills such asteamwork, leadership, business management, and engineering ethics into the engineeringcurricula [1]–[3]. In addition, research has shown that opportunities for students to practiceprofessional skills significantly contribute to them being prepared for actual professional practiceupon graduation [4], [5].While engineering programs have worked to incorporate non-technical professional skills intothe already-packed curriculum, the development of these skills has also been shown to occur inother settings. Co-curricular activities such as professional societies, student organizations, andresearch opportunities offer students
Education Research (EER)AbstractThis paper reports on a project funded through the Engineering Education and Centers (EEC)Division of the National Science Foundation. The project is aimed towards buildingunderstanding in the engineering education research (EER) community about the potential valueof secondary data analysis (SDA) as well as developing guidelines for using this researchapproach. Changing the paradigm of single-use data collection will require actionable, provenpractices for effective, ethical data sharing, coupled with sufficient incentives to both share anduse existing data. To that end, this project drew together a team of experts and emergingresearchers to develop a shared understanding of SDA, and to conduct two intentional
students took the same 8-hour exam regardless of their engineering discipline [1]. After1996, while the four-hour morning portion of the exam remained the same for all applicants, adiscipline specific afternoon session was added. The FE exam went through a major overhaul in2014, including a reduction in the number of test questions and the addition of a requirement thateach examinee choose a test in one of seven engineering disciplines: chemical, civil, electricaland computer, environmental, industrial and systems, mechanical, or other disciplines [11, 12].There are still some subject areas that are common to all seven of the FE disciplines:mathematics, probability and statistics, ethics and professional practice, and engineeringeconomics [9]. As
real world environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety,constructability, and sustainability constraints. This project provided an academic enrichmentand curriculum engagement for students to apply their knowledge to benefit the community. Thispaper discusses capstone design project objectives, student learning activities, educationaloutcome assessment mapping, faculty reflections and lessons learned.IntroductionIn professional practice, engineers build successful careers out of solving open-ended problems[1]. However, the well-structured and constrained problems that engineering students tend tosolve at the early level coursework, do little to prepare them for the complexity of ambiguousand unstructured real-world problems [1
10 Center of Mass and Angular Momentum 11 Harmonic Motion Rotational Motion 12 Engineering Ethics (1) 13 Engineering Ethics (2) Harmonic Motion 14 Art & Engineering (1)Table 3 ENGR/PHYS 217 topics by week Week Lecture Lab 1 Lecture 1: Meet Your DAQ 2 Lecture 2: Intro to Arduino Intro to DAQ 3 Lecture 3: More on Arduino Intro to Arduino 4 Lecture 4: “Resistance is Futile” Arduino Display 5 Lecture 5: Data Analysis & Project Management Electric Field and Electric Potential 6 Lecture 6: CPM & some more on
. 2Third, the networks in which employees are embedded have shifted, becoming more cross-organizational and distributed in nature. This can facilitate learning and knowledge sharing,but can also create barriers for studying the many informal and formal networks that transcendconventional structures. Many of these networks also span geographic and/or culturalboundaries. Spanning these boundaries not only necessitates using various technologies forcommunication but can also involve differences in language and other communicative practices,technical training, ethical grounding, and regulatory environments. The use of social mediaplatforms like LinkedIn is also reshaping what it means to be a professional and engage intechnical work. Rather than
field of study. ethical behavior, and social responsibility. Knowledge and Scholarship: To build Aviation/Aerospace Management Technical the capacity to identify and conduct Competence: Students will demonstrate expert original research, scholarship or creative knowledge, skills, and ability in aspects of aviation endeavors. safety, sustainability, and quality management. Ethical and Responsible Research: To Analytical and Responsible Research demonstrate the ability to conduct Competence: Students will demonstrate research in an ethical and responsible competency in the application of quantitative, manner
stipulates: Student Outcome:5. An ability to understand ethical and professional responsibilities and the impact of technical and/orscientific solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts. 6. An ability to functioneffectively on teams that establish goals, plan tasks, meet deadlines, and analyze risk and uncertainty. Theobjective of this project is to develop new and refine available tools for assessing some of the soft skillsthat would fulfill ANSAC requirements. It is expected to finalize a set of tools, as outcomes, and havethem tested in the classrooms by the end of the project.Introduction and BackgroundConstruction is an interconnected process. The construction engineers and managers work cooperativelywith many