videos and answer self-checked, multiple-choice132 questions on the topics covered in the videos. The in-class component of each cycle consists of133 2-hr of class time with the instructor where students work on conceptual and simple programming134 questions that do not require them to write or submit code. Instead, students answer questions135 interactively via their mobile devices or laptops and work in small groups using peer instruction136 pedagogy 20 . The students then participate in a 3-hour lab led by undergraduate Teaching137 Assistants (TAs) with a ratio of 20-30 students per 2 TAs, and consist of a multiple-choice quiz138 and solving programming exercises by writing and submitting code. In the after-class component139
discussions on thefollowing topics: • Free on-campus resources for creating videos • Importance of accessibility • Best practices in video design • Creating and measuring learning objectives for videos • Search engine optimization to boost viewership • Miscellaneous technical sessions such as editing in Camtasia Studio and improving audio qualityAdditionally, three Cal Poly Pomona faculty guest speakers shared their experiences developingvideos and using those videos to experiment with various pedagogies.FLC members received a small stipend and hardware consisting of a microphone headset,webcam, and writing pad to facilitate video production. Each FLC member was required toproduce four videos during the program and were encouraged to
to connect to moreacademic support (2); (3); (4). By providing a physical environment for students in engineeringmajors to live, our program has historically allowed students to make academic and socialconnections early in their college career, which better supports their persistence. In recent years,students in the Engineering Leadership Community have taken multiple classes in the samesections together, including a one-credit academic success course and their introductoryengineering lab. This method uses Tinto’s learning community model, helping students to makeconnections between courses with their peers (1).The additional elements of service-learning and project-based learning have brought theresidents of the Engineering Leadership
balcony. The Competition was limitedby requiring students to design alternative viable solutions and using the alternative solutionsas the Competition. Each member of the group had to investigate and design a uniqueframing plan. Finally, the Benefits were to be articulated through evaluation metrics considered in the design such as cost and constructability. An example of the written proposal is shown in Appendix 1.3.) Peer Evaluation (10%) Two rubric evaluations are conducted. Failure to complete the peer reviews by the deadline will result in zero score for the peer evaluation portion of the project. Due: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 & Friday, December 7, 20184.) Presentation (15%) Each team is to give a
welfare. The explosion of publications, research data, and othersources of information available in the digital age poses a challenge for researchers to keepabreast of current developments in their fields. The Association of College and ResearchLibraries (ACRL) outlines some of the unique aspects of information literacy as it pertains toSTEM in its Information Literacy Standards for Science and Engineering/Technology.Challenges identified include the cost of peer reviewed journals, the plethora of grey literaturesources and need to understand who is funding and publishing these works; the ofteninterdisciplinary nature of discoveries; and the need for proficiency in working with a myriad ofdifferent formats of information, often requiring
challenges students’ understanding and reinforces their knowledge.A key learning approach implemented in this method is collaboration, where students work withtheir peers to complete the required tasks, as opposed to working individually. The effectivenessof collaborative learning compared with individual learning has been established in other studies.In a meta-analysis of 168 studies, Johnson et al. [7] found that collaborative learning activitiesimproved academic achievement, quality of interpersonal interaction, improved self-esteem, andimproved perceptions of greater social support. Similarly, Springer et al. [8] found thatcollaboration improved academic achievement, student attitudes, and retention in academicprograms. The peer learning that
Pennsylvania StateUniversity. In its eighth year at the time of this writing, the online MSME program hasexperienced significant growth and over the last five years of the online MSME program hasgone from a total of ~40 students in the program to 130 students. Nearly 50 students havingearned their master’s of science degrees via the online program. This growth is in part due toexplicit theory-driven attention to pedagogy, recruitment, mentoring, and facilitated guidance.Similar to our resident students, our online students have faculty research advisors and conductmasters-level research projects. This research element makes our online MSME program unique.While there is increasingly more written about the modest growth in online engineeringeducation
toquestions such as "Who am I ?" at the beginning of the course provides the opportunity for suchpractice. We also recommend that students critique each other's concept maps. The opportunityto offer peer feedback further exposes students to the rules and expectations for conceptmapping. This scaffolding approach is expected to improve the quality of the pre- and post-evaluation of the concept maps during module implementation.Furthermore, reflective writing is a useful tool for having students reflect on their personalexperiences while surprisingly teaching students empathy. The act of looking beyond their ownexperiences to the experiences of various stakeholders appears to have created opportunities forstudents to consider broader social and
) educational technology, (3) the student’s rolein the engineering college, and (4) the professor’s role in the engineering college. Theparticipants were instructed to write 10 words or phrases that come to their mind when they thinkabout each of the questions and rank their answers in the order of importance. Following theindividual questions, ten questions were discussed in a focus group. The results of the studyshowed that when it comes to evaluation of education and teaching methods, students would liketo see more opportunities to give input in the system and be more involved as part of the creationin all levels and steps. Current literature on Excellence in Engineering Education stresses theimportance of skills and knowledge but leaves out two
III.The Freshman and Sophomore Engineering Clinics are intended to provide a foundation ofengineering skills needed for Junior/Senior Engineering Clinic. The goals of the SophomoreEngineering Clinic consist of teaching engineering design principles and technicalcommunication (technical writing in the fall, public speaking in the spring). The SophomoreEngineering Clinic is an integrated course, team-taught by Communication and Engineeringfaculty. There are two 75 minute lecture periods and one 160-minute lab period each week.Students work on design problems during lab periods, which are supervised by a team of 5-6engineering faculty representing all four Rowan engineering departments (Chemical, Civil &Environmental, Electrical & Computer
approaches undertaken since 2008, in Introductionto Engineering, to introduce freshmen engineering students to critical thinking. Also presentedare recent 2009 revisions to the components of the course, such as the reworking of the casestudies in an effort to encourage students to demonstrate critical thinking. Explicit discussionswith the students regarding the reasons for time and effort being spent on case studies and criticalthinking were also added to the course. The number of critical thinking assignments wasincreased, expanded, and further clarified from the previous year and some assignments werealso redesigned to allow for some peer reinforcement during intermediate stages. Statisticalanalysis of a pre and post assessment of critical
? Page 6.800.12 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education g. How difficult is it to move from a research-focused institution to a teaching-focused institution? What about the reverse? h. What is “peer instruction” and “collaborative learning?” How have you used these techniques in your class?5. Grant Writing – The Funding Process a. Provide an overview of the grant writing, application, review and selection process to obtain funding. b. Is it better to choose a research area and then find funding, or find out the “hot” areas are for a particular funding agency and tailor
has worked at the University of Glasgow specialising in teaching English for Academic and Specific Purposes. Anna is interested in academic development, particularly related to writing skills and graduate attributes. She has developed a keen interest in e-learning and how technologies can be used to enhance learning and teaching processes. Her special areas of interest include: effective online course and activity design, building online communities and multimodal approaches to writing and assessment. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Investigating EAST (English for Academic Study Tele-collaboration) A UK- Palestine English Language Project for Engineering and Science
Leadership Capability Spider Chart was used as a tool for feedback and self-assessment.Entering the program, supervisors and peers rate the student, and the student rates themself oneach of the capabilities, on a scale between 0 (“no competency”) and 10 (“acknowledgedmastery”). Upon completion of the program, this exercise was repeated.While change and improvement all of the 14 capabilities are collected, this paper concentrates onfive specific capabilities, targeted by exercises in the area of “developing a professionalnetwork.”5 Why networking in an engineering program?The value of developing a personal network has been a staple in leading business schools forover a generation as a method for building business relationships, sharing ideas and
utilizing experimental measurement, computational simulation, scale flight tests, andprototyping. The course design allows students to feel adequately prepared to tackle the relativelycomplex design space associated with scale model rockets as well as give them ampleopportunities to practice project management, data analysis, and technical writing skills. Using alongitudinal survey, students report that they valued such a deep design experience early in theiracademic career, felt more prepared for later courses in the curriculum, and were better able totackle future complex design challenges in their senior capstone.Introduction This paper details the design and use of as design/build fly (DBF) experience as a semester-long activity to develop
. Currently, he is an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering Department. During the last 20 years, he has been working in the areas of hierarchical multiprocessors, hierarchical networks, performance analysis of computer systems, digital signal processing, embedded systems, in-vehicle networking, performance analysis of networking protocols, secure wireless communications, and privacy protected vehicle-to-vehicle communications and simulation techniques. He has supervised a number of projects from Ford Motor Company and other local industries. He also served as a Co-PI on two NSF funded projects. He has published over 100 peer-reviewed journal and conference proceeding papers. He
members within their program of study. What made this workshop design different is the participation from each entity in the alliance and their knowledge about technology programs. The objectives for the workshops are accomplished by the following activities: 1. The students joined American Toastmasters or similar organizations which assists them with soft skills and helps them with their writing skills and public speaking. 2. Students received job training through practical lab assignments and real life applications. The students then present discoveries and are evaluated by their peers, industry, faculty, and advisory board. 3. Increase students’ technical
to support their academic and social transition to college. To achieve thesegoals, the course curriculum emphasized career exploration, collaboration with peers, writtenreflections, and diversity and global learning opportunities.We identified with Yosso’s theory of “navigational capital,” which captures the knowledge andskills of underrepresented or underprivileged students that enable them to navigate institutionsand communities where a dominant culture prevails 27. Rather than taking a deficit approach (i.e.minority students need to be fixed), this study focuses on cultivating the strengths and assets offirst-generation and URM students to guide them toward success in engineering. In addition tosupporting these students, this course and
writes that as students become active learners, they also become more sociallyengaged.16 In order for a living and learning community to be successful, it must promote the fullacademic and social integration of its students to improve their persistence.Literature ReviewThe National Study of Living and Learning Programs has found that one of the best ways toanalyze the impact of living and learning communities is to review Astin’s inputs-environments- Page 24.872.4outcomes conceptual model.17 Essentially, Astin’s model states that in order to effectivelyobserve how a college environment influences student retention (outcome), student inputs
, compared to the non-ASP student population in this course, theASP student population includes a higher percentage of first-generation college students, studentswho attended lower-resourced high schools, and minoritized students. Specifically, 42% of ASPstudents are first-generation students, compared to 6% of non-ASP students. The distribution ofmedian income for the zip code of the high school that students attended skews substantiallylower for ASP students than that of their peers. In addition, 27% of ASP students are Blackcompared to 1% of non-ASP students, and 16% of ASP students are Hispanic compared to 4% ofnon-ASP students.Given the grade differential between ASP and non-ASP sections, these data indicate thatfirst-generation students
-efficacy have been related to improved academic and career outcomes [3],especially for women in non-traditional fields such as engineering. The goal of the study is todetermine simple yet effective strategies that can be implemented in engineering classrooms toimprove self-efficacy.Seven engineering faculty members participated in a faculty learning community (FLC), asemester long program to learn about teaching strategies in each of the four areas of self-efficacy; mastery experiences (e.g., active learning, scaffolding), vicarious learning (e.g., guestlectures, peer mentors, group work), social persuasion (e.g., constructive feedback, positive self-talk), and emotional arousal (e.g., test anxiety, building rapport). The faculty then chose
institution requires we gain approval from the certifying body for theuniversity's state. All institutions in the state must evaluate the effectiveness of their UCC atregular intervals. Our teaching methods and content has evolved such that the institution's componentcourses and pedagogies of Team Teaching are vital to achieving the desired outcomes. Ourmodel is an "all in" team endeavor; our instructional team meets with all classes, and such is anenterprising dynamic, engaging faculty, staff, and near-peer teachers, working together. Modeling teamwork is a core attribution of our approach. Research-to-practice becomespractice-to-research as we learn new ways to help our students succeed while growing theirpreparedness for future success
first-year students, are particularly difficultfor students to succeed as they transitioned to college. Exam formats and expectations aredifferent than what students experienced in high school and vary from class to class. Engineeringmajors report spending a greater amount of time preparing for classes and exams [2]. Manystudents new to college report that they don’t know how to study and prepare for college exams[3], anecdotally reporting that in high school it was sufficient to simply read over notes. Mostnew students are also still building their support network of peers and may solely be studying ontheir own. Additionally, in many courses exams can comprise a significant portion of the finalgrade. Doing poorly on an exam can also have a
professional development on negotiation skills,a glimpse of the life and career of ECE faculty members, information on different types ofschools, tips on how to prepare for a successful academic position interview, and opportunitiesfor networking with over 300 department heads and 40 peers. In response to a post-workshopsurvey, students reported that they particularly valued the networking opportunities withdepartment heads and peers provided by this unique opportunity to bring students and chairstogether at the ECEDHA conference. Participants’ interest in postdoc and faculty positionsincreased after the workshop with more of an increase in interest in faculty positions. Those whoresponded to a second survey six months later reported that they
whichnetwork collaborations and communications relate to team outcomes, and understand hownetwork differences both before and after joining Pathways contribute to successful changeefforts. This research aligns with the extensive literature review that informed the design ofPathways, which emphasized the importance of a peer network in the design of an effectivefaculty development program2. Drawing upon research on community networks within acollective impact framework3,4, the authors hypothesize that the Pathways initiative, which“…involv[es] a centralized infrastructure, a dedicated staff, and a structured process that leads toa common agenda, shared measurement, continuous communication, and mutually reinforcingactivities among all participants” (p
university students.This paper details the specifics of the community, peer and faculty support that we offer at SPUto engineering student recipients of our S-STEM scholarship program funded by the NationalScience Foundation (NSF). This paper contributes to the literature by providing insights into thelived experiences of engineering transfer students. As engineering faculty and staff, we havegleaned these insights by working more closely with this group of students than we often are ableto with non-S-STEM students. We are writing to share these insights to other faculty who, likeus, do not typically have the opportunity to get to know student stories this closely. This paperalso contributes to the literature by detailing the impact of various
instructional strategy Page 12.1083.3 in a series of environmental biotechnology courses; 2. Deliver course content to learners in a variety of settings and across disciplines within a single university system; 3. Assess student learning to substantiate that the instructional methods result in increased (a) student conceptual knowledge and understanding, (b) critical thinking skills, (c) ability to seek out new information, (d) ability to work collaboratively in teams; and (e) ability to engage in productive assessment (self-assessment, peer assessment, program assessment). 4. Provide faculty with the
increase students’ attitudes towards communityservice and efficacy with engineering skills. The students in the PBSL section of the course out-gained their peers in non-service PBL sections for efficacy and awareness. The female and URMstudents in the PBSL section had the greatest gains in efficacy over the course of the semester.The non-service PBL females and majority students had the greatest gains for attitudes towardscommunity service, though it is important to note again that the PBSL students started with veryhigh attitude scores on this factor.Skyline High School’s four-year STEM curriculum focuses on higher-level thinking,communication, writing and many other 21st-century skills necessary for successful studentlearning. Students have
questions. It is a detriment to their career if a person does not ask questions. Oralcommunication skills on technical subject matter are extremely important as project updates areoften informally presented to peers at team meetings. If a project is to be presented to upperlevel management, such as the Vice President of R&D, the presenter is typically coached so thepresentation is appropriate. Cassy also mentioned that the ability to write reports is important,but the writing standard is not as high as writing a journal article. It is also important to be ableto work within various cultures because her team is located in many different areas of the world.In graduate school, Cassy felt that she had a good team environment; therefore, the
haste to complete the exercises. The clarity of text-based exercises can often be an issue. Not every student interprets instructions in the same way. Students read and interpret instructions at different speeds. This results in challenges keeping the class moving through material together. This can exacerbate a weaker student’s understanding of critical concepts as they rush in an attempt to keep pace with their peers. Instructors and TAs are often by-standers when students are working on these exercises. In many cases they are relegated to assisting students understand the instructions rather than engaging them in deepening their understanding of the concepts. This is not the best use of their time and skill