and major Design Stem development of required courses as seen in Figure 6.Freshmen starting in Fall 2011 were the first to see the Computer Aided Design, MechanicalDesign I, and Mechanical Design II (ME 170, ME 370 and ME 371, respectively) improvements.The freshmen starting in Fall 2014 were the first class to see an integrated hands-on designsequence in all four years since Design for Manufacturability (ME 270) was first introduced tosophomores in Fall 2015. It should be noted that the four-year retention does not includestudents who transferred to other majors, and students who took longer than four years tograduate. While many factors influence student retention, the increase in retention is nonethelesspositive and reflects one of the
physicallydemanding for both the students and him – he was lecturing for almost five hours twice a weekand the students were expected to pay attention for an inordinate amount of time, but given verylittle time to absorb the material and practice problem solving. While there were clear learningobstacles to overcome in the class, it was even more challenging for part-time students who wereeither working to support themselves financially or doing an internship. Consider the followingtwo anonymous comments from students of the Summer 2015 class, which are reflective of someof the difficulties faced by the students: 1. Less homework. It’s impossible to finish if you work and have other priorities in life. 2. The difficulty of the class. The home works were
(SVE)experiences. The attendees self-organized into two tables. They were asked to “identify anddiscuss common challenges veteran and military students face” to address the followingquestions: • How can ASEE build early awareness of engineering technology, engineering technologist, and engineering pathways? • How can ASEE ensure academic recognition for prior military work experience? • How can ASEE provide seamless support from government agencies, academic institutions, and industry?Each participant silently reflected and wrote their ideas as they related to the prompts on stickynotes. At the end of the session, the session leaders reorganized the notes into initiativecategories, as applicable. As
]need to implement a rigorous system of evaluation of their pedagogical assessments through theuse of a measurement model that makes such demands on the data. To that end, theimplementation of Rasch measurement models will provide robust validation for the measures ofstudent learning outcomes, which in turn can improve course curricula by accurately targetingdomains and transferable skillsets critical to the development of this generation’s chemicalengineers.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.DUE 1712186. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the
in this material are those ofthe authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Thework was initiated through a STEM Collaborative grant awarded by the Leona M. and Harry B.Helmsley Charitable Trust. Development of the freshman engineering course was also supportedby the Boeing Company and by a STEM grant from the Office of Naval Research (ContractNumber N00014-15-1-2434). The authors are also grateful for support from the Provost’s Officefor the FYrE program, and to Professor Monika Kress of the Department of Physics andAstronomy at San José State University, who provided insight on her pre-physics coursedevelopment. Finally, the contributions of the entire FYrE faculty and staff team, notably DebbieWon
”. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57(1), 2010, p. 23.[17] S. Porter & P. Umbach, “College major choice: An analysis of person–environment fit”. Research in higher education, 47(4), 2006, pp. 429-449.[18] J. Holland, Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Psychological Assessment Resources, 1997.[19] K. Rask & J. Tiefenthaler, “The role of grade sensitivity in explaining the gender imbalance in undergraduate economics”. Economics of Education Review, 27(6), 2008, pp. 676-687.[20] M. Anderson & J. Swazey, “Reflections on the graduate student experience: An overview”. New directions for higher education, 1998(101), 3-13.[21] G. Malaney, “Why
14/15 ME 2/6 4/7(A) Prototyping tool usage: Department-specific tool use in EE projects increasedsignificantly from before-PIDS at 5.7 (SD 2.5) to after-PIDS at 9.6 (SD 2.6); t(9) = 3.63, p =0.003 (Figure 1). Department-specific tool use among ME projects experienced a small, butsignificant increase from 6.8 (SD 2.0) to 8.9, (SD 2.1); t(17) = 2.45, p = .012 (Figure 1). Figure 1. Tool usage among department-specific projects.Within EE, the increase in tool use reflects an increase in both the number of tools used by eachteam and the proficiency of tool use. All tools were used by a larger percentage of teams after thedesign studio; the largest gains were made among
failure, and seek out growth opportunities.Similarly, Cutts, et. al18, conducted a study in their introductory programming course at theUniversity of Glasgow. Students in the course received one or more of three tools designed to be“mindset interventions,” i.e., to help students shift from a fixed to a growth mindset. The firsttool was a series of workshops taught by the tutors, guiding the students in reflecting on theirexperiences so far in the course and how they fit into a fixed or growth mindset. The second toolwas a handout listing resources, tools, and tips successful computing students frequently use toget unstuck. This handout would be referenced by the tutors whenever they helped a student,guiding them towards a recognition that they
@usafa.edu Lt Col Cory Cooper, Ph.D. cory.cooper@usafa.edu Capt Kalyn Tung, M.S. kalyn.tung@usafa.eduDisclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect theofficial policy or position of the United States Air Force Academy, the Air Force, the Department ofDefense, or the U.S. Government. Distribution A. Approved for public release, USAFA-DF-2018-96:distribution unlimited.References[1] ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2018-2019,” 2017. [Online]. Available:http://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/E001-18-19-EAC-Criteria-11-29-17-FINAL_updated1218.pdf. [Accessed: Jan 18, 2018].[2] Scott, B., and J. Bartolomei. "US Air Force Academy Launches
a differentperspective of how a student’s URM identity could affect their progress towards degree completion. Finally,it provides institutions with recommendations on how to improve their support for students towards doctoraldegree completion. Acknowledgements This research was supported by the National Science Foundation under Award No. 1723314. Anyopinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authorsand do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. References [1] M. Sana, “Immigrants and natives in US science and engineering occupations, 1994–2006,” Demography, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 801–820, 2010. [2] “Engage to Excel: Producing One
thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF. The authorsacknowledge the larger research study team including Amy Arnolds for her help with intercoderwork. We also thank our study participants and partner school liaisons.References[1] C. Amelink, and E. G. Creamer, “Gender differences in elements of the undergraduate experience that influence satisfaction with the engineering major and the intent to pursue engineering as a career,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 81-92, 2010.[2] S. Sheppard, S. Gilmartin, H. L. Chen, K. Donaldson, G. Lichtenstein, O. Eris, M. Lande, and G. Toye, “Exploring the engineering student experience: Findings from the Academic Pathways
theadvantage of one of the largest and most diverse populations of learners in the state of Florida. TheBC and PBSC student populations reflect the socioeconomic and ethnic diversity of the SouthFlorida area, with a majority of the enrolled students hailing from minority backgrounds.The articulation program has intended to build a sustainable and growing pipeline of studentsenrolling in Computer Engineering and Computer Science majors. The implementation of theprogram has centered on student success. As we prepared the program, we asked, “What dostudents need to successfully decide/get into college?” In addition to the reducing the worryabout how they would pay for College, we recognized that students need support in terms ofmentoring and advising
identified as Asian, Hispanic or White. As stated previously this may reflect thestudents’ willingness to participate in engineering’s culture, although at this time no conclusiveevidence, and presents a clear arena for future work.Out-degreeHaving established that social structure was receptive to diverse interactions, we tested to see if aparticular racial group was more socially active than their peers. The descriptive statistics (Table3) suggest that out-degree behavior is highly volatile (large standard deviations and range),positively skewed and extremely leptokurtic. KW testing (H(5) = 5.6179, p = .3452) concludesthat out-degree values are not dependent on the students’ racial/ ethnicity identification. Table 3: Descriptive statistics for
preferred if the report was due before the exam, so we all get a chance to really think and analyze the process. The math would be good practice for the exam as well. The demonstration was confusing at first, but I feel like struggling my way through it really helped me understand the concepts. It was helpful to be required to solve these equations and calculate actual values. It was, however, do to inconsistent data, unhelpful to get values that were no reflective of reality. Yes, the hands on nature of directly seeing the effects of the energy balance helped me understand the equation visually and mentally. It helped me in setting up a problem to solve for the friction of the system. I believe I could have
student development and transfer into engineering.Participants were recruited from the 2013 to 2016 cohorts through a recruitment email explainingthe purpose of the study. Two focus groups of six participants each were conducted, lastingapproximately 75 minutes each. Focus group participants provided their consent for recordingthe session. Following an introduction, overview of the study, and completion of the IRB consentforms, the focus group facilitator engaged the students in a series of discussion questions andactivities, encouraging students to reflect on and share about their experiences in the FYSEprogram. After the sessions, the recordings were transcribed and reviewed by the researchers.Transcriptions and notes were then coded for
approaches with technical engineering skills. This requires anenhanced curriculum with a focus on student teamwork, a greater consideration of social context,improved communication with diverse constituents, and reflection on an ethical understanding oftheir decisions and solutions. Effective faculty members need to mirror these values and skills intheir instruction and mentoring. Efforts have begun to reimagine the “engineering canon” whichrequires a shift from positioning engineering as a purely technical endeavor to framing it associo-technical. We are developing a new General Engineering program that incorporates thisperspective [30]. In addition, we are developing modules that emphasize the sociotechnicalnature of engineering for traditional
students were coming in with proficiency with the Parallax BOE-Bot.Additionally, the Arduino provided more functionality. Thus, changing to the Arduino allowedfor advances to the projects being conducted in the classes. Also, choosing to use the Arduinorequired the curriculum developers to design a chassis to make the microcontroller mobile for theENGR 120 robot challenge. This chassis construction added more fabrication opportunities forthe students to experience.When the Arduino was implemented in the curriculum in 2011, updates were made to coursematerials to reflect the new microcontroller. However, since that time six years ago, the coursehas not undergone a major update. Viewing curriculum as a living document, faculty atLouisiana Tech
Style Model [16, 17]. Sensing learners (concrete, practical, vs. Intuitive learners (conceptual, innovative, oriented toward facts and procedures) oriented toward theories and meanings); Visual learners (prefer visual vs. Verbal learners (prefer written and representations of presented material) spoken explanations); Inductive learners (prefer presentations that vs. Deductive learners (prefer presentations proceed from the specific to the general) that go from the general to the specific); Active learners (learn by trying things out, vs. Reflective learners (learn by thinking working with others) things
apprenticeships, capstone design projects, andinternships, are offered as part of the ADVANCE model. The ultimate goal of the degreepathway model that ADVANCE offers is to ensure that students are prepared for post-baccalaureate employment and success in the workplace. ADVANCE seeks to ensure that whatstudents learn and experience in their educational journey reflects workforce realities. Mappeddegree pathways that integrate industry-defined credentials and standards will leave noambiguity for students regarding desired workforce competencies. By building in immersiveexperiential learning opportunities, students will better understand workplace expectations andprepare to transition successfully upon graduation.As ADVANCE students progress through their
committees, and on the NSF ENG division’s Advisory Committee. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 CRITICAL GPA AND STANDARDIZED TEST SCORE ADMISSION THRESHOLDSAbstract: We must increasingly engage and capitalize on the contributions of people frombackgrounds underrepresented in engineering, especially women and people of color, if we are toeducate enough engineers to meet demand and propel our nation’s competitiveness through anengineering workforce reflective of our nation’s diversity. This study focuses on broadeningpathways into engineering, expanding both the diversity and size of the engineering studentpopulation. We hypothesized that engineering colleges’ over-reliance on standardized test
about the Black experience, reflecting the unfairexpectation that Black students serve as experts in discussions of culture and ethnicity [20].As our study focuses on students who attended PWIs, future research should explore theexperiences of Black student veterans who attend historically black colleges and universities(HBCUs) as prior research indicates that such institutions provide a supportive environment forBlack students in general [19] and BSVs in particular [37]. Further research will also exploreother aspects of BSVE identity, such as family relationships and religion not included here.AcknowledgementThis work is supported by the National Science Foundation through Awards 1428512 and1428646. The opinions herein are solely the authors
contributing to the students’belongingness to their academic unit; however, they were regarded as meaningful interactions with advisors.Students did not perceive such psychological and emotional support as the responsibilities of their advisors,as Farzad mentioned, “I understand what support is, so I'm not looking for beautiful words from [myadvisor]”. This contributes to the impact of student expectations on their perceived quality of interactionsand reflects the previously reported limited interactions with advisors [13].Theme 5. Unease being “friends” with peers This theme includes student perceived challenges in socialization that result in a lower possibilityof being socially accepted and included in a community, i.e., feeling or lacking
to pre-class actives, in-class activities are much more flexible. Some commonindividual activities include polling (e.g., iClickers), gaming (e.g., Kahoot), concept maps,individual problem solving, one-minute paper/reflection, and so on. Some examples of groupactivities are think-pair-share, group problem solving, in-class projects, opinion line-up, sticky-note clustering, fishbowl, cumulative brainstorming, crowdsourcing, etc.. More details of in-classactive learning activities can be found in33. In addition to the basic components and structures, knowing the advantages and challenges offlipped classroom teaching is also helpful for instructors to maximize the positive effects andreduce the negative effects on students’ learning. This
potential stakeholders for a new product or service3 Business value creation is the company owner’s concern4 Business risk assessment is the business manager’s responsibility5 I like to learn about entrepreneurship Every time I fail a task, I reflect on why I failed so that I can learn how to do better6 in the future7 I understand why a monopolistic market is usually not favorable to consumers8 I consider how multiple changes affect each other9 I am confident in leading a team to work on a project10 I have had exposure to entrepreneurship concepts before entering college I have the ability to anticipate technical developments by interpreting surrounding11 social trends12 When I see a piece of machinery, I always
design of the VR teachingmodule to be more immersive and visualized. The current VR module is a semi self-paced tutorial.Concurrent research (Phase III) is being conducted to investigate how well students understand thequeuing theory concept using this updated VR teaching module versus traditional classroomlecture. Data is currently being collected using a different set of students with the same conceptualquiz but taught the topic in a traditional classroom manner (control group). Afterwards, we plan toprovide a comparative analysis of both approaches, control group versus experimental group anddisseminate the results.. The sections discussed below only reflects how well the students performusing the VR training module (experimental group
asked simply do you know any engineers and if so who. More thanhalf (56%) reported not knowing any engineers. These results are interesting, because the stateof Michigan as a whole has one of the largest per-capita populations of engineers in the country.Yet, the greater Lansing metropolitan area is a bit of an exception to that trend, with very fewtechnology based employers. That is reflected in this data, with only 14 students reporting thattheir parents are engineers. The majority of those responding that they knew an engineer tendedto cite a more distant relationship both in terms of bloodline and geography.Many of the survey questions focused on student perceptions of what do engineers do, and whatdoes it take to become an engineer. These
for the academic year 2017/18, withapproximately 125,000 students in Year 1. Considering the impending increase, taking 125, 000as the population size, a sample size of 383 is needed to achieve a 95% confidence level with a5% confidence interval. Data collection in the project reported on in this paper is currently stillongoing with the aim of collecting data from 400 Irish 3rd Year students and 400 Swedish Year 9students. The results reported in this paper reflect the current stage of data collection (ntotal = 513)and come from five random Irish schools and five random Swedish schools. Participants fromIreland (nIreland = 302) had a mean age of 14.63 (SD = 0.54) and comprised of 136 males, 149females, 9 participants who identified as other
manager’s blog [20]reported US$3.98 per LoC for a traditional programming design team that he personally servedas the design architect and manager. Several other studies [19] report software development costsranging from $5-100 per LoC. Lines of Code written per student 2500 2000 1500 LoC 1000 500 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 YearFigure 2: Average student output for a semester-long effort for 2007-2019Changes in the course’s design requirements are reflected in Figure 2. For example, the designrequirements changed only
’ pre- and post SBST and PRVT:R test scores to further understandhow students’ strategies may be related to improvement in score performance and developmentin spatial skills over the course of the semester. The latter can help make informed decisionsabout which of these strategies to reinforce in future iterations of the course.ReferencesAdams, R., Punnakanta, P., Atman, C. J., & Lewis, C. D. (2002). Comparing Design Team Self- Reports with Actual Performance: Cross-Validating Assessment Instruments. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.Adams, R. S., Turns, J., & Atman, C. J. (2003). Educating effective engineering designers: The role of reflective practice. Design Studies, 24(3), 275–294
Civil Engineering Capstone Design which exposesthe senior engineering students to real-world design challenges reflects experiences students willface as professionals, benefiting those who plan to pursue engineering careers after graduation.Exposing students to both the UN Sustainable Development Goals and the Envision RatingSystem aligns with both the ASCE BOK and ABET criteria requiring engineers to understandthe importance of sustainability within their designs. The Capstone Design projects examinedwithin this study are all infrastructure projects which did not address all of the UN SustainableDevelopment Goals, but they did address eight out of the seventeen. With the addition of theEnvision Rating System students learned to think beyond