2006-2029: CAN ASSESSMENT BE A MARKETING TOOL FOR YOURPROGRAM? THE ROLES OF ASSESSMENT, STUDENT SUCCESS ANDFACULTY IN PROGRAM SUCCESSKim Nankivell, Purdue University-CalumetJana Whittington, Purdue University-CalumetJoy Colwell, Purdue University-Calumet Page 11.303.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Can Assessment be a Marketing Tool for Your Program? The Roles of Assessment, Student Success and Faculty in Program SuccessAbstractThe growth of technology in the last fifteen years has not only restructured existing degreeoptions but has also created new avenues for a quality education. Institutions have recognized theneed for marketing and promoting, but
energy crisis has encouraged a revolution inenergy use and conservation. The paradigm shift from fossil fuels to “green” energy has alsobegun to have a major impact on college science and engineering curricula. While the nationbattles to loosen the grip of fossil fuels on the economic infrastructure, institutes of highereducation struggle to attract, retrain, and graduate innovative young minds for future careers inan increasingly demanding and complex energy industry.The difficulty in preparing a sufficient number of quality scientists and engineers reflects a long-standing national trend. The number of students obtaining post-secondary engineering orengineering technology degree continues to stagnate while overall graduation rates are on
AC 2012-3929: DNA TO GO: A DO-IT-YOURSELF PCR THERMOCY-CLER LABDr. Victor M. Ugaz, Texas A&M University Victor Ugaz is an Associate Professor and Kenneth R. Hall Development Professor in the Artie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering, Dwight Look College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. He joined the faculty in Jan. 2003. His research focuses broadly on harnessing the unique characteristics of transport and flow at the microscale, with specific interests in microfluidic flows (both single-phase and nanoparticle suspensions), microchip gel electrophoresis, PCR thermocycling in novel convective flow devices, and construction of 3D vascular flow networks for biomedical applications. Ugaz earned
Paper ID #11927Development of a Programmable Integrated Switch Matrix (PrISM) throughUniversity-Industry CollaborationDr. Baha Jassemnejad, Federal Aviation Administration-CNI Airway Syatems Engineering Organization Baha Jassemnejad was a Professor of Engineering and Physics and is a senior IEEE member as well as an ABET PEV. He is working as an Electronics Engineer VI for the FAA-Chickasaw Nation Industries, a contractor for National Airway Systems Engineering Organization.Mr. Igor IlikjJonathan Ryan Adams Full time electrical engineering student, currently working on masters degree.Mr. Neil Peery, CNI Aviation Technical
jobs. One participantresponded with the following: I came to this job with kind of an open mind. I didn't really know what exactly I wanted to do after college, so I pretty much took the mentality of I was up for anything, job-wise. And this was kind of the first and best option that came around to me so I took it. I didn't really know what to expect, but from what my professors told me, just [the] engineering professional world in general is that you have to, like communicating with people that aren't engineers is a big thing and, you know, it certainly is in my job. – Jeff, Data Set 2In this quote, Jeff talks about having not really known what to expect upon started his first jobpost-graduation and
offering ofeSMART in Spring 2020, ninety-four students across multiple academic programs registered andcompeted.Another goal of the eSMART is to engage the large number of freshman engineers on theGalveston campus. With this in mind, all teams must use the Lego EV3 controller and Pythonprogramming to control their vehicle. Because our freshmen students take a Python programmingcourse in their first semester, this allows them to participate and use their newfound knowledge tosupport the team. The Lego control brick and motors were the only forms of propulsion control &power allowed for their sea-going design, not a standard choice given that these modules are notwaterproof and seaworthy.This paper describes the competition in detail, including
EM — fostering curiosity, connections and thecreation of value. An entrepreneurial mindset will allow engineers entering the workforce tocreate personal, economic, and societal value through a lifetime of meaningful work [1].This goal to teach engineers about EM is focused on transformation of the minds and hearts ofindividuals, an invitation to become co-investigators in a nationwide experiment. Facultydevelopment has become one of the four core strategies in this mission. The others includebuilding thriving communities, working with affiliate organizations, and considering emergentideas that surround higher education. Faculty development aligns with all three of the other corestrategies.One important aspect of the EU faculty development
Paper ID #33032Development of WeBWorK Prelab Problem Sets to Support Student LearningMs. Sheena Miao Ying Tan, Simon Fraser University Sheena is currently a PhD student in mathematics education at Simon Fraser University. She was pre- viously a secondary mathematics teacher in Singapore and has worked in the Ministry of Education, Singapore. She was the research assistant for the project to develop and implement WeBWorK prelab problems in the course SEE 310, to enhance students’ learning.Taco Niet Ph.D., P.Eng., School of Sustainable Energy Engineering, Simon Fraser University Taco is an Assistant Professor of Professional
Paper ID #17980Work In Progress: Methodological Considerations for Constructing Nontra-ditional Student Personas with Scenarios from Online Forum Usage Data inCalculusDr. Angela Minichiello P.E., Utah State University Angela Minichiello is an assistant professor the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State Uni- versity (USU) and a registered professional mechanical engineer. Angela earned a BSME degree from the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, a MSME degree from the Georgia Institute of Technology, and a PhD in Engineering Education from USU. Her research examines issues of access, diversity, and
to learn in an engineering senior design experience11,12,13.The objective of the study is to identify if external validators and teachingassistants are useful in identifying students’ proficiency in specific areas such asinnovation, prototyping, and design. In order to generate a comparablebenchmark, the instructor scored students using an interactive design challengewith the same metrics in mind. We hypothesize that students’ design challengescores would be similar to both external validators and teaching assistants scoreson the gamma prototype. This comparison can help determine if externalvalidators and teaching assistants can accurately assess student’s capabilities andskills in a project-based learning course. This would further
Paper ID #26999Pollution Prevention and Energy Efficiency: A Case Study for EngineeringExtension Services in the Desert SouthwestJalal Rastegary, New Mexico State UniversityDr. Patricia A. Sullivan, New Mexico State University Patricia A. Sullivan serves as Associate Dean for Outreach and Recruitment in the College of Engineering at New Mexico State University. She received her PhD in industrial engineering and has over 34 years’ experience directing statewide engineering outreach services that include technical engineering business assistance, professional development, and educational outreach programs. She is co-PI for a
, while the Civil Engineering Professional is expected to exercise responsible in chargeduties and have acquired sufficient knowledge and experience to handle complex engineeringproblems, the Civil Engineering Technologist is presumed to have adequate knowledge andexperience to address well-defined problems, and more importantly, to possess specific and in-depth knowledge within at least one specialty area, knowledge that may go beyond that of theCivil Engineering Professional. With this understanding in mind, the CET-BOK identifies 17specialty outcomes that are unique to the role of the Civil Engineering Technologist. Theseoutcomes are formulated in the cognitive domain and for the most part have assigned levels ofachievement at either
Paper ID #15418Developing Student-centered Partnerships: Professional Socialization and theTransition to IndustryMs. Glenda D Young, Virginia Tech Glenda Young is a third year PhD Candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She is from Starkville, MS where she attended Mississippi State University (MSU) and earned a Bachelor of Science in Industrial Engineering. She also earned a Masters of Industrial and Systems Engineering from Auburn University (AU). Glenda is a Gates Millennium Scholar and her research interest include academic-industry partnerships, student transitions, and broadening
Paper ID #9671Wanna Take a Survey? Exploring Tools to Increase Undergraduate StudentResponse Rates to Real-Time Experience SurveysMs. Danielle Almetria Smalls, Engineering Education Department at Virginia TechDr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Holly Matusovich (co-PI) is an Assistant Professor in Virginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. Her expertise includes motivation and related frameworks, using these frameworks broadly to study student engagement in learning
mind. Most of us have biases of which we are unaware. 5. Create equal opportunities for all students to participate in class discussions and answer questions. Beware of low ability signals such as asking women less challenging questions (Schnellmann & Gibbons, 1984). 6. Use diverse examples. In STEM this might include a variety of applications that would be meaningful to different gender identities, sexual orientations, or cultural backgrounds, or that address different societal needs. An instructor might seek opportunities to highlight contributions of LGBTQ engineers or scientists or others from minority or underrepresented groups, giving appropriate acknowledgement to the individual’s
Paper ID #30292Gender Stereotypes: Historical comparison of female students’ beliefs oncareer, marriage, and children (1935 versus 2019 populations)Dr. Suzanne Zurn-Birkhimer, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Suzanne Zurn-Birkhimer is Associate Director of the Women in Engineering Program and Associate Professor (by courtesy) in the Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences at Purdue Uni- versity. Dr. Zurn-Birkhimer conducts research and leads retention activities including administration of the undergraduate and graduate mentoring programs and the teaching of the Women
AC 2009-898: A MODEL FOR INTEGRATING ETHICS INTO AN ENGINEERINGCURRICULUMDonald McEachron, Drexel UniversitySheila Vaidya, Drexel University Interim Associate Dean for Research School of EducationStacey Ake, Drexel University Assistant Professor of Philosophy Department of English and Philosophy Page 14.60.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 A MODEL FOR ETHICS INTEGRATION INTO AN ENGINEERING CURRICULUMAbstractEthics education is currently of major concern in higher education and in engineering inparticular. There are many reasons for this, such as the seeming increase of cheating andplagiarism
Paper ID #12107History and Heritage as a Vehicle for Contemporary IssuesDr. Douglas G Schmucker, University of Utah Dr. Schmucker has 15 years experience focused on high quality teaching following the T4E, ExCEEd, and NETI teaching models. A full-time teaching professional, he focuses on practice, project, and problem- based teaching methodologies.Dr. Steven J. Burian, University of Utah Page 26.847.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 History and Heritage as a Vehicle
most: it is students’ long-term success. As Hopkins et al state, “success in some disciplines [engineering among them]depends on students possessing a cumulative body of knowledge and is thwarted by poorretention of foundational content.”1This cumulative body of knowledge is often described as knowledge structure and there is aproblem: the connections within many students’ mental knowledge structure are weak and,therefore, the structure itself is ineffective. As a structural engineer, the author became concernedwith the integrity of the structures being built in his students’ minds and realized a new designphilosophy was necessary for the courses he taught.The way students organize, or structure, what they learn is critically important. This
AC 2010-1428: INTEGRATING ETHICS CURRICULUM WITHIN ASERVICE-LEARNING DESIGN CONTEXTCraig Titus, Purdue University Craig Titus is a Ph.D. candidate in Philosophy at Purdue University and a graduate assistant for the EPICS Program, participating in the curriculum development and the research teams.Carla Zoltowski, Purdue University CARLA B. ZOLTOWSKI is Education Administrator of the EPICS Program at Purdue University. She received her BSEE and MSEE from Purdue University, and is a PhD Candidate in Engineering Education at Purdue. She has served as a lecturer in Purdue’s School of Electrical and Computer Engineering.William Oakes, Purdue University William Oakes is the Director of the
Paper ID #8897Fostering the Development of Critical Thinking in an Introduction to Chem-ical Process Engineering Design CourseMrs. Gladis Ch´avez-Torrej´on, Universidad de las Americas Puebla Gladis Ch´avez-Torrej´on is Science, Engineering, and Technology Education Ph.D. Student at Universidad de las Americas Puebla in Mexico. She teaches psychology related courses. Her research interests include critical thinking, cognitive processes, and creating effective learning environments.Mrs. Silvia Husted, Universidad de las Americas Puebla Silvia Husted is Science, Engineering, and Technology Education Ph.D. Student at
guidance anddirection for students to generate innovative ideas for their projects.Given CoE’s limited experience in entrepreneurial-minded learning (EML), CoE believes thisteaching approach proved useful tool to engage students in coming up with relevant ideas forprojects and classroom activities that create market value. CoE also believes that thecombination of embedded EML ( [1], [2], [3], [4]) activities and the system engineering processprovide a rewarding learning experience for students. CoE also believes that the system thinkingfound in the entrepreneurial concept aligns well with the system engineering approach for thelast several years in making project ideas become reality ( [5], [6] [7], [8], [9]).Accreditation Board for Engineering
the course.Many students create study aids while reviewing course material and in preparation for exams.These may include crib sheets, outlines reviewing key concepts, mind maps, or summaryparagraphs. For mathematics and engineering courses, students often prepare for exams byreworking homework problems or working review problems provided by instructors or found inold course files. The act of creating study aids or working problems can improve understandingof course material and the student’s ability to recall that information but it does not require thestudent to communicate this knowledge with others nor does it require or encourage creativity.Effective communication skills are critical for engineers and have long been a student
Fluid Power Association (NFPA) forsponsoring the presented work, and the support of fellow faculty members at Lawrence Tech fortheir willingness to use valuable class time in support of this work.References[1] L. Liu, J. Mynderse, A. Gerhart and R. Fletcher, "Embedding Problem-Based Learning and Entrepreneurially Minded Learning into Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics Courses through Fluid Power Based Modules," in Frontiers in Education Conference, Indianapolis, 2017.[2] M. Prince, "Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 223-231, 2004.[3] A. L. Gerhart and D. E. Melton, "Entrepreneurially Minded Learning: Incorporating Stakeholders, Discovery, Opportunity
Paper ID #36712Lean Practices in Academia; A Comprehensive Review and aNew Provisional ModelSimin Nasseri Dr. Simin Nasseri is a full professor in the department of Mechanical Engineering at Kennesaw State University (Former Southern Polytechnic State University). She obtained her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Sydney University, Australia, where she worked as a senior research associate. She has more than twenty five years of academic/industrial experience and has obtained many patents, and published many book-chapters, journal and conference papers. Her research areas include Rheology and
contribution of intrinsic and extrinsic spatial skills Br. J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 675 697, 2018, doi: 10.1111/bjep.12211.[27] T. Green, D. Kane, G. M. Timko, N disadvantages of a virtual/online engineering experience during COVID-19 for blind and low- Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition, Minneapolis, MN, Jun. 2022.[28] Mind Brain Educ., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 144 152, 2017, doi: 10.1111/mbe.12145.[29] Br. J. Vis. Impair., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 7 16, 2002, doi: 10.1177/026461960202000103.[30] J. Vis. Impair. Blind
field. All three of these tests were assessed with innovation,prototyping, and design in mind. Additionally, it would be important to note thatthe core of the course is developed using the entrepreneurial mindset14. This formof problem-based learning has worked with students in prior courses and fits themodel of using a prototype-based surrogate to teach engineering design8.The objective of the study was to identify if student improvement in innovation,prototyping skills, and design and the design process is affected by differentinstructors and during different time and day of the week. Identifying if classesthat are critical to student learning and performance are transferable will helpinstructors and possibly departments determine the best
Paper ID #19451Impact of Classroom Demonstrations and Surveys on Higher-level LearningMiss Namhee Kim, Texas A&M University Namhee Kim is a Ph.D. student in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Texas A&M University. She received her B.S. and M.E. in Mechanical & Control Engineering from the Handong Global Uni- versity in South Korea. Her research is focused on developing a least-squares finite element model with spectral/hp approximations to analyze the flows of non-Newtonian fluids. She is also interested in teach- ing techniques and has worked with Dr. McVay and Dr. Srinivasa at Texas A&M University
500corporations and small start-ups. Others have served in legislative and agency leadershippositons at the federal and state level. These individuals felt strongly that their engineeringeducation prepared them to assume the diverse roles they were to later play as professionals, butmost also opined that they felt unprepared when confronted with their first leadership challengesfollowing graduation. The Engineering Leadership program at the University of Kentucky wasinitiated to address this.The program was established in 2007 through the support and active involvement of L. StanleyPigman, an alumnus of the College, and with the following goals in mind: 1. Program Goal 1: To develop a pilot program in the college for the enhancement of career
patterns looking for specific evidence ofthese behaviors and saw that there were nuances to each of these levels. The students wehighlight below represent this range and some of the nuances we saw in the data. In thefollowing section, we suggest the implications that our observations can have for supportingteachers as they teach engineering, identify how to promote expert behaviors, and fosterengineering habits of mind. We also believe that our data emphasizes the need for a deeperevaluation of student’s approaches to solving authentic and realistic engineering problems. Page 26.593.4Beginning designer patterns in understanding the challenge and