courses in science and/ormathematics thus further preparing them for careers in the science, technology, engineering andmath (STEM) related college degree programs3. As a result, there was a 25% drop inundergraduate enrollment reported during 1982-2000 period4. In the same study, it was notedthat over 800,000 students graduated from high schools in 2000; however, only 7,200 of thesestudents graduated with an engineering degree from a four-year institution 4. To furtheraccentuate the problem, the numbers of students in STEM related disciplines in underrepresentedgroups such as women, Hispanics, and African-Americans were at an even greater deficit asthey appear to select careers in programs such as the social sciences or complete their
factors2. Resources applied to reducing the pipeline leaks can have adramatic impact on the diversity and the effectiveness of the future STEM workforce3. Inaddition to low income and ethnic minority students, pre-college students hailing fromrural areas often have less access to the types of programming and mentoring which opentheir eyes to STEM career options4.This paper describes both an easily scalable program model to bring middle and highschool young women onto campus and the evolution of that program. By comparing theinitial iteration of the program with its current state, lessons are distilled in the hopes thatother programs will be able to reduce their learning curve.The Initial ProgramThroughout the evolution of the program, the goal was
Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationWhatever the correctness of that debate of how full or empty the glass of opportunities is, globalcareer competition is a fact and will increase in intensity6. In a real sense, global careercompetition is prototypical of the problems created by globalization. The simple facts are thatknowledge favors those who seek it and that knowledge is readily available to virtuallyeveryone. Thus, engineering design will follow the historic path of manufacturing from westernnations to global markets. A process of world-wide employment equalization appears to be underway that includes the migration of highly skilled jobs.Global career
career awareness.• The center will help to establish an early awareness of an engineering career path - especially critical to populations that are underrepresented in engineering.• The center will lead in learner-centered, hands-on, engineering activities with K-12 students.Engineering Programs in DeliveryThe center’s objectives are being met through various programs being delivered tostudents in grades K-12 and their current and future teachers. In a mobile roboticsprogram utilizing Legos and “Not Quite C” programming, an engineering course wascreated which provides technological literacy, hands-on learning activities, and fieldexperiences for future teachers. “Toying With Technology1,2,” as this program is titled,brings these hands
influenced the College of Page 6.582.1 “Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education”Engineering’s pedagogical issues by focussing on our major missions that were outlined by thefirst members of the student chapter in the mission statement: … [The University of Michigan American Society for Engineering Education Student Chapter] provides services to prepare interested graduate students better in their pursuit of careers in academia; to provide undergraduate students with a better
committed to increasing the number of young women pursuing science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) careers. Paige has 18 years of experience recruiting and retaining diverse populations in engineering. She earned her B.S. in Engineering Science and Mechanics (1992) and her M.S. (1998) and Ph.D. (2004) in Industrial and Systems Engineering from Virginia Tech.Bevlee A. Watford, Virginia Tech Bevlee A. Watford is the interim department head of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She is also director of the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity. She is a fellow of ASEE.Gregory M. Wilkins, Ph.D., Morgan State University Dr. Gregory M. Wilkins is a member of the faculty of the Department of
including 3 in medical school, 1 in dentalschool, 1 in law school, 4 working on PhDs and 13 working toward masters or havingcompleted masters degrees. Seventeen (22%) of the college graduates are working asprofessional engineers, architects or computer scientists. This article discusses themethods used to develop a very valuable and meaningful community outreach programthat continues to achieve its goal of helping improve the pipeline of students deciding tostudy STEM in college and going onto STEM careers. Page 25.358.2 IntroductionGeneration Y, Millennial Generation, or Generation Next are terms used to describe
AC 2012-4183: ALIGNING FLORIDA’S MANUFACTURING PROGRAMSWITH EXTERNAL STANDARDS: CLOSING THE LOOPSDr. Marilyn Barger, Hillsborough Community College Marilyn Barger is the Principal Investigator and Executive Director of FLATE, the Florida Regional Cen- ter of Advanced Technological Education, funded by the National Science Foundation and housed at Hillsborough Community College in Tampa, Fla., since 2004. FLATE serves the state of Florida and its region and is involved in outreach and recruitment of students into technical career pathways, curriculum development and reform for secondary and post-secondary Career and Technical Education programs, and professional development for technical teachers and faculty focused
, including interview skills training can be quite helpful to students.This paper discusses a particular strategy, the STAR method, used in a chemical engineeringlaboratory course to prepare students for answering almost any behavioral interview question.The behavioral type of interview question is the type most often used in many engineeringcompanies. The paper describes use of the STAR interview response, in-class activities, practiceusing sample questions, and an interview chart assignment. Finally, students’ assessment of themethod and interview chart is presented through the results of a survey.Some may question why professors from a school with a strong career center should even botherto offer interview instruction. Proponents of providing in
essential components and growth opportunities of thefoundation - manufacturing and innovation - of an economy.There are many indicators of the decline of manufacturing in the US, most of them economic.One troubling indicator is the persistent lack of interest in careers in this field, particularly at thecollegiate and post-graduate level. While there are continual calls for better labor force trainingand government programs to support the same, there are actually disincentives for promisingyoung professionals to enter this field. Societal perception and industry needs seem to runcounter to one another. We propose that the MEngM can serve as one example of a newnational model for professional manufacturing engineering education. It can profoundly
womenand men, the needs of women (and many men) for supportive and nurturing relationships in themidst of a highly competitive educational system. Mentoring strategies that fit more readilywith a female cultural worldview, according to well-accepted theories on the sociology ofgender, are peer-, multiple- and collective mentorships. Mentoring of women must alsoacknowledge the socially-constructed dynamics of gender that affect cross-gender relationshipsand respond to the special ways in which women must often balance career and familyrelationships. Successful mentoring of women rests on, and can help create, a caring communityin which women (and men) have equal access to all educational resources including thoserelevant to their psychosocial as
the end of each work period.Students are hopefully trained as leaders, but they also must be treated as followers and givendirections that will cause them to secure answers to questions that revolve around their experiencewithin industry. If students are left to aimlessly wander during their work experience, they willmost likely fail to see some of the important elements of working in their chosen professions duringtheir college or university careers. They also may find that the information for which they are askedto share when they return to their respective schools may have been lost or never even thoughtabout during their experience. It is important to lay sufficient groundwork for the students beforethey move into the industrial settings
futurecareers, and (2) serves as a platform through which the undergraduate experience of all studentsin the program is enhanced. The approach involves complementary engagement of a technicaladvisor, a course instructor, a course facilitator, and an industry sponsor. The technical advisorensures that the project synthesizes and applies technical knowledge (e.g., engineering design,software, analysis, prototyping, testing, project management, etc.) as taught in the sophomoreand junior years. The course instructor is responsible for overall guidance, scheduling,assignments, team set-up and coordination, and assessment. The course facilitator incorporatesspecialty seminars, networking events, outreach, site visits, and career opportunities offeredwithin
disciplines [2]. Engineering curriculums typically well-incorporate fundamentalinstruction through required introductory applied mathematics, physics, chemistry, computerscience, and engineering design coursework. However, exposure to multiple disciplines is oftenoverlooked in the process of developing engineering curriculums [3-5]. Given that majorselection is typically done in students’ first and second years [6-11], sufficient exposure toresearch, career/internship, alumni/professional experiences, and ethical/social insights isespecially important early in college. This will enable students to better choose majors/careersthat align with their interests and aptitudes [12-13]. Engineers stand to acquire many benefitsfrom an interdisciplinary
Paper ID #43933Board 328: Lessons Learned from First-time, First-year Startup of ASESS-STEM ProgramDr. Dick Apronti, Angelo State University Dick Apronti is an associate professor at Angelo State University. He teaches transportation engineering courses, engineering graphics, and plane surveying. His research interests are in transportation safety and planning.Dr. William A Kitch P.E., Angelo State University Dr. Kitch is Professor and Chair of the David L. Hirschfeld Department of Engineering at Angelo State University. Before starting his academic career he spent 24 years as a practicing engineer in both the public
a fulltime practicing professional engineer.Constant turnover in the position was difficult to handle and an adjunct could not expand thecourse into a program. In 2006, the author began to teach the class and initiated a majorcollaborative effort with practitioners in the state in order to 1) improve land development designeducation, including increasing student awareness of land development design as a career path,and 2) increase student – practitioner interaction. The Land Development Design Initiative(LDDI) involves more than 70 engineering and land development firms and directly involvesindustry professionals in teaching, mentoring, curriculum development, and promoting landdevelopment to undergraduate students.Strategic planning for
Carolyn Labun is a Senior Instructor in the School of Engineer at the Okanagan campus of the University of British Columbia. Page 22.685.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Education-Engineering Collaborative Research Project Exploding Stereotypes: Care and Collaboration in EngineeringOverview and AimsResearch has found that students in schools often hold stereotypes of STEM (Science,Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) subjects and careers: they view them as male-dominated, individualistic8 and uncaring. They are perceived to marginalize women.6 Thesestereotypes
AC 2011-1758: FRONTIERS OF ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGI-NEERING: AN INTRODUCTORY FIRST YEAR COURSEJohn A. Orr, Worcester Polytechnic Institute John A. Orr is Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Worcester Polytechnic Institute and served as Provost of WPI from 2007 through June, 2010. Prior to this he held the position of Dean of Undergraduate Studies. He served as head of the Electrical and Computer Engineering department from 1988 to 2003. Dr. Orr received the BS and PhD degrees in Electrical Engineering from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, and the MS degree in Electrical Engineering from Stanford University. He began his professional career at Bell Laboratories and joined the faculty
). Page 22.277.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Benefits and Challenges of Go!: An Innovative Online Publication to Attract Teens to TransportationAbstractThis paper discusses benefits and challenges of creating, supporting, and promoting a unique freeonline publication called Go! designed to attract middle and high school students to educationalopportunities and careers in transportation.In addition to workforce development, Go! also serves as a valuable resource for supporting andenhancing informal STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) education.Go!’s value lies in its online presence and informative STEM articles that foster
schools in the Greater Los Angeles Area haveparticipated in SECOP. By working with community organizations we have reachedhighly motivated students who are close to our university geographically. Thesecommunity organizations are valuable sources of inspired students who have supportivefamilies who are very eager to have their children participate in a summer program fortwo weeks.SECOP focuses on introducing students to science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) careers and improving students’ content knowledge in these topicareas. The goal of SECOP is to address the shortage of African American, Latino andNative American and female students studying STEM at college level by introducingstudents to pre-engineering and advanced
engineers,faculty, and undergraduate and graduate students throughout the week. Topics of discussion notonly include general engineering questions, but also issues specific to females pursuing careersin engineering. At the end of camp, the girls present what they learned and demonstrate theirrobots to their parents, teachers, and peer participants. To date, over 125 girls representing a broad spectrum of ethnic and socio-economicbackgrounds have completed the program. To provide continued support, guidance, and contactwith other GRADE campers, faculty and guests throughout the girls’ academic careers, allGRADE Camp participants are encouraged to use a dedicated and secure GRADE CampCommunities of Practice website. Efforts are ongoing to track
academic departmentsacross two colleges, and the Enrollment Management and Career Services Division at RIT. Allof the programs in the five participating departments are ABET-accredited, and require studentsto obtain one year of industry co-op experience before graduation. The MEET Scholars programbuilds upon our excellent infrastructure for mentoring students, and involves our mandatorycooperative education program – both of which help students address their financial needs andfacilitate placement in the high technology workforce. RIT has an exceptional record inengineering student placement in industry after graduation and an excellent record for bothretaining and graduating upper-division transfer students.IntroductionIn September of 2004 the
. Page 7.1023.1 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright ã 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationI. IntroductionNative American (NA) population is highly underrepresented in mat hematics, science, andengineering (MSE) professions. North Dakota has a sizeable NA population in its fiveReservations. Though there are five Tribally Controlled Community Colleges in the Statestriving hard to create higher education opportunities for N A students, there is concern with thelow numbers of students who attempt MSE careers. There is a significant need to address theacademic preparation of Native American high school students in mathematics and science
Session #2559 Promoting Manufacturing Engineering Technology Programs at the High School and Middle School Levels Using CAD Radha Balamuralikrishna & Clifford R. Mirman Northern Illinois University DeKalb, IL 60115, USA Email: bala@ceet.niu.edu, mirman@ceet.niu.eduOverviewIn an earlier publication, the authors presented a set of ideas advocating the use of computer-aided design (CAD) to inspire middle and high school students consider a career in engineeringtechnology through study at a higher educational
Paper ID #44895Role of Engineering Ethics Case Studies and Student LearningMiss Caprice Abigail Pramana, State University of New York, Canton Abigail Pramana is a student-athlete pursuing her bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering at SUNY Canton. Abigail’s passion and interest in engineering are rooted in her acceptance to Aviation Career and Technical High School, where she gained an educational background in airframe and powerplant. Since pursuing an Aircraft Maintenance Technician License, Abigail’s diligence and interest in Engineering and its surrounding ethics have grown. Abigail is a devoted member of the
basedon excellence in teaching. All three of these individuals are faculty at R1 institutions and havereceived recognition for their innovative teaching in terms of awards and media attention.Pseudonyms have been assigned to protect confidentiality. The three individuals are at distinctcareer stages – an early-career assistant professor, a mid-career associate professor, and a late-career full professor. Pseudonyms are prefaced with e, m, and l respectively to indicate early-,mid-, and late- career stages. The questions in the interview were designed to elicit the stories Page 23.1145.3of how they came to adopt and evolve their teaching and to
success by firstworking in such positions in professional and discipline societies as well as understanding theimpacts for early career faculty.Michigan State University was funded through the NSF ADVANCE program for an InstitutionalTransformation Grant. One of the components of this ADVANCE grant focused on women’sleadership. This leadership project had an overarching goal of understanding what factorsmotivated women faculty to become leaders. Within this overarching goal, the women’sleadership team also wanted to better understand the roles their disciplinary/professionalsocieties played in leadership development and advancement.As a beginning step to meet these goals, the women’s leadership team needed to first understandhow women participated
emerged calledEngaging Youth through Engineering or EYE. The goal of EYE was and still is to engage areayouth in grades 4-9 in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) academics andcareers by providing students with a coordinated continuum of curricular and extra-curricularexperiences that use real life engineering design challenges as a “hook.” Once “hooked,” andwith careful guidance and support of “adult influencers” (teachers, counselors, parents, andbusiness volunteers), the theory of action is that youth will become motivated and choose to takethe high school mathematics and science coursework needed in preparation for STEM post-secondary study and careers, but not required by the district or the state.The EYE curriculum at
, otherassets can be used to leverage resources available to forge careers in engineering [2]. Studentsstudying engineering in the borderlands experience additional hardships when navigating highereducation, as they manage tensions across disciplinary expertise, culture, language, as well asphysical borders of state and nation [3]. In this work in progress paper for the EQUITY group inASEE, we offer counternarratives of student experiences as possible resources for social justicework in local departmental contexts. The questions that we pose in our session are: A) How can constructed counternarratives of student experiences guide departmental dialog about equity and inclusion? B) How can faculty and staff serve as co-conspirators in the
or career preparation and placement. The studentcommunity is cultivated through academic monitoring, mentoring, professional developmentand community building activities. Two kinds of mentoring relationships are encouraged; peermentoring between the graduate and undergraduate students and hierarchical mentoring betweenfaculty and graduate students to support community building, encourage academic excellenceand increase career preparation. The program involves two cohorts of approximately 11undergraduates each and five cohorts of about four graduate students each. In addition tofinancial need and citizenship criteria, other selection factors include academic performance,motivation, and calculus I enrollment (undergraduates).This paper will