Asee peer logo
Well-matched quotation marks can be used to demarcate phrases, and the + and - operators can be used to require or exclude words respectively
Displaying results 2311 - 2340 of 3607 in total
Conference Session
NSF Grantees: Student Learning 3
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Denise Wilson, University of Washington
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Paper ID #31756The Role of Teaching Assistants and Faculty in Student EngagementDr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson is a professor of electrical engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. Her research interests in engineering education focus on the role of self-efficacy, belonging, and other non- cognitive aspects of the student experience on engagement, success, and persistence and on effective methods for teaching global issues such as those pertaining to sustainability. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020
Conference Session
Student Division Technical 4: Student Experience & Competencies
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Hamidreza Taimoory, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; David Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Walter Lee, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
STEM,” J. Negro Educ., pp. 491–504, 2011.[41] R. Maccabe and T. D. Fonseca, “‘Lightbulb’ moments in higher education: peer-to-peer support in engineering education,” Mentor. Tutoring Partnersh. Learn., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 453–470, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1080/13611267.2021.1952393.[42] S. Ayllón, Á. Alsina, and J. Colomer, “Teachers’ involvement and students’ self-efficacy: Keys to achievement in higher education,” PLoS One, vol. 14, no. 5, p. e0216865, May 2019, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216865.[43] W. Boles and K. Whelan, “Barriers to student success in engineering education,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 368–381, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2016.1189879.[44] J. Malm, L. Bryngfors, and
Conference Session
Student Assessments and Tests
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Chinedu Alexander Emeka; Craig Zilles, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Matthew West, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Geoffrey L. Herman, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Timothy Bretl, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
, “The development and validation of a new multidimensional test anxiety scale (mtas),” European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2020.[23] R. Driscoll, “Westside test anxiety scale validation.” Online submission, 2007.[24] J. Taylor and F. P. Deane, “Development of a short form of the test anxiety inventory (tai),” The Journal of General Psychology, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 127–136, 2002.[25] C. D. Spielberger, “Manual for the state-trait anxietry, inventory,” Consulting Psychologist, 1970.[26] E. S. Cerino, “Relationships between academic motivation, self-efficacy, and academic procrastination.” Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, vol. 19, no. 4, 2014.[27] P. Steel, “The nature of procrastination: a meta-analytic and
Conference Session
Academic Success and Retention
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Olusola Adesope, Washington State University; Oluwafemi J. Sunday, Washington State University; Ebenezer Rotimi Ewumi, Washington State University; Angela Minichiello P.E., Utah State University; Muhammad Asghar P.E., Utah State University; Candis S. Claiborn, Washington State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
ofpractices that would result in the maximum attainment of academic success for students fromvarious backgrounds and among different levels of their study program (i.e., first-year or seniorstudents). Additionally, these engagement practices' voluntary nature means that students fromminority demographic groups might not participate, and they are more at risk of dropping out ofan engineering program. However, studies have shown that participation in HIEP improves E/CSHIEP participation could be a predictor of academic success [5]. The combination of severalengagement academic practices, and experience would increase the general knowledge within amajor, improves competence (self-efficacy), social interactions, and job opportunities [1
Conference Session
WEDNESDAY PLENARY: Featuring Best Zone and PIC Papers & Corporate Member Council Keynote Speaker, Sponsored by EngineeringCAS
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Chao Wang, Arizona State University
Tagged Topics
Corporate Member Council
ofmotivations, resulting in more optimal learning outcomes, when three basic psychological needsare satisfied: autonomy, a sense of choice and control; relatedness, a sense of positive andsupportive connections to others; and competence, a sense of mastery and self-efficacy [18].In a real-world setting, individuals express multiple forms of motivation to varying degrees inany given activity, instead of appearing as either autonomous/internalized orcontrolled/externalized. Examining the learner’s motivation across the whole continuum ofamotivation, external regulation, identified regulation and intrinsic motivation, i.e.,characterizing it into a motivational response profile [19-21], can provide diagnostic informationand practical insights into course
Collection
2018 ASEE Zone IV Conference
Authors
Ryan Yedinak, Cañada College; Oskar Granados, Canada College; Vincent Vu Thanh Tran, San Jose State University; Moises Arturo Vieyra, Canada College; Alec William Maxwell, San Francisco State University; Amelito G Enriquez, Canada College; Wenshen Pong P.E., San Francisco State University; Cheng Chen, San Francisco State University; Kwok Siong Teh, San Francisco State University; Xiaorong Zhang, San Francisco State University; Hamid Mahmoodi, San Francisco State University; Hao Jiang, San Francisco State University; Zhaoshuo Jiang P.E., San Francisco State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
to use acoustic sensors for non-contact, non-destructive structural health monitoring.After learning basic theory through a series of training workshops, the students performedexperimental testing with various configurations of an array of microphone sensors on a single-degree-of-freedom structure excited by an earthquake simulator. With the acquired data, severalpost-processing algorithms are proposed to extract the useful information and eliminateunwanted signals.In addition to the surveys, the participants were invited to participate in a 30-minute conversationabout their summer internship experience to examine the internships’ impact on interviewees interms of: i) engineering self-efficacy and commitment to engineering as a career; ii
Conference Session
Tricks of the Trade II
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Srikanth Tadepalli, University of Texas, Austin; Cameron Booth, University of Texas, Austin; Mitchell Pryor
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
response to assigned tasks: minimumtime, optimum efficiency, peak effective experience, early assessment, open escape routes andproximity to reward.Chu et. al.9 introduce the concept of active procrastinators where students deliberately workunder pressure and produce similar output as non-procrastinators. The authors provide empiricalevidence suggesting active procrastinators do considerably better than passive procrastinators interms of time use, self-efficacy belief, extrinsic motivation, stress-coping strategies, have higherGPA's and lead less stressful lives than passive procrastinators.The literature has shed light on various concerns that affect procrastination and how we perceiveits negative impact on student learning. However, no metrics
Conference Session
The Best of First-year Programs Division
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Chao Wang, Arizona State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
punishment avoidance.SDT also postulates that individuals will adopt more internalized/autonomous forms ofmotivations, resulting in more optimal learning outcomes, when three basic psychological needsare satisfied: autonomy, a sense of choice and control; relatedness, a sense of positive andsupportive connections to others; and competence, a sense of mastery and self-efficacy [18].In a real-world setting, individuals express multiple forms of motivation to varying degrees inany given activity, instead of appearing as either autonomous/internalized orcontrolled/externalized. Examining the learner’s motivation across the whole continuum ofamotivation, external regulation, identified regulation and intrinsic motivation, i.e.,characterizing it into a
Conference Session
ERM: Conceptualizations of Engineering and Engineering Education
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nikita Dawe, University of Toronto; Lisa Romkey, University of Toronto; Amy Bilton; Kimia Moozeh, University of Toronto
to self-efficacy (confident). Together,these represent a lifelong learning orientation. Although the original TLO tool was developed foruse by students in specific undergraduate courses [10], it is grounded in rich theory and builds oninstruments that have been modified for the workplace (e.g. [29]) and thus seems applicable toour work.5.1.2 Career EnablersAs described, a recurring theme in our data was “the benefits of lifelong learning formultidisciplinary work and innovation.” Engineering education literature focuses on the role oflifelong learning in keeping skillsets up-to-date in response to technological change [7] but this istypically conceptualized in relation to a disciplinary knowledge base. In addition to this role, weidentified
Conference Session
Multidisciplinary Course Efforts
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ravi T. Shankar, Florida Atlantic University; Teresa J. Sakraida, Florida Atlantic University, Christine E. Lynn College of Nursing; Francis Xavier McAfee, Florida Atlantic University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Multidisciplinary Engineering
for success and the value they attach to the available options. Simply put, theEccles’ theory suggests that choices to engage in activities are shaped by competence and valuebeliefs. Competence is about acquiring skills and applying them. Competence beliefs have beenstudied more widely than value beliefs among K-12 and engineering students. They are mostlybased on the self-efficacy theory (Bandura, 1997). Self-efficacy is enhanced by positivefeedback, better performance, and social comparisons. Value beliefs, on the other hand, have notbeen that well studied. Whereas competency beliefs look at a person’s ability to engage in anactivity, value beliefs consider the desire and/or importance of engaging in the activity.The value system refers to
Conference Session
Student Motivation, Identity, and Resilience
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Brianna Benedict McIntyre, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Kayla R. Maxey, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Dina Verdin, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
: ConflictingFeminisms and Self-determination, and The Nature of Engineering: Authoring DisciplinaryNarratives. Within the “Vulnerability and Strength Regarding Math” narrative, the Emiliaexercised her agency by pursuing engineering as a career choice, despite her low mathematics self-efficacy, discouraging conversations with family members, and rigor culture that suggested thatstudents must excel in mathematics to be a good engineer. In addition to rejecting the “culturalmotif” associated with engineering, the student also made a conscious effort to network withprofessional engineers to understand what aspects of engineering required math. The studentdemonstrated their agency by asking questions and taking action to resist the dominant narrativeof what it
Conference Session
Instructional and Learning Assessment in Chemical Engineering
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico; Abhaya K. Datye, University of New Mexico; Jamie R Gomez, University of New Mexico; Victor Law, Program of Organization, Information, and Learning Sciences at University of New Mexico; Sophia Bowers, University of New Mexico
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
Process: An Expert Study of Advanced Practicing Professionals, in Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2005, ASEE: Portland, OR. p. 1-27.55. Carberry, A.R., H.S. Lee, and M.W. Ohland, Measuring engineering design selfefficacy. Journal of Engineering Education, 2010. 99(1): p. 71-79.56. Nocito-Gobel, J., et al., Are Attitudes Toward Engineering Influenced by a Project-Based Introductory Course, in Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: The Changing Landscape of Engineering and Technology Education in a Global World. 2005, ASEE: Portland, OR. p. 693-706.57. Sheppard, S., et al., Exploring the Engineering Student Experience: Findings from the Academic Pathways of People
Conference Session
Teacher and Counselor Professional Development
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Stephen O'Brien, The College of New Jersey
Tagged Divisions
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
, coupled with high anxiety and low self-efficacy can lead to low teachereffectiveness and lack of interest from the K-5 students. At our institution, The College ofNew Jersey (TCNJ), it was felt that the Department of Technological Studies, housed withinthe School of Engineering, was well positioned to provide a unique K-5 academic major bycombining the T&E with the M&S components of STEM, resulting in a program breadth thatmatches well the breadth of skills needed by a highly skilled K-5 teacher.Such a program was established at TCNJ in 1998 and is formally referred to as the Math-Science-Technology or MST program. The program has substantial requirements in allSTEM areas, and takes a truly integrated-STEM approach. To the authors
Conference Session
CIT Division Technical Session #2
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Robin Hensel, West Virginia University; Katerina Goseva-Popstojanova, West Virginia University
example, focusingon how that learning will be evaluated for a grade [7]. These pre-graduation professionaldevelopment opportunities promote occupational socialization by creating environments inwhich students engage directly with practicing professionals and learn the expectations and worknorms of the cybersecurity profession [8]. Differences between the participation of ACCESSscholars and other cybersecurity students in these professional development opportunities arepresented.Expected persistence and academic success can be measured in multiple ways considering theeffects of motivation, self-efficacy, grit, and achievement. This work uses GPA to measureacademic success and grit and its sub-scores to predict expected persistence.3.0 MethodologyA
Conference Session
ERM: Let's Talk about Tests! (Tests Part 1)
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nelson Granja, Universidad San Francisco de Quito; Miguel Andrés Guerra, Universidad San Francisco de Quito; Vanessa Guerra, University of Virginia
,” in 2000 Annual Conference, 2000, pp. 5–469.[20] R. O. Mines, “The Impact of Testing Frequency and Final Exams on Student Performance,” p. 8, 2014.[21] K. Gannon, “What Is the Purpose of Final Exams, Anyway?,” p. 4, 2018.[22] C. Armitage, “Extended time limits on university examinations,” pp. vii; 55 leaves ; 30 cm., 1999, doi: 10.11575/PRISM/18065.[23] G. O’Sullivan, “The relationship between hope, eustress, self-efficacy, and life satisfaction among undergraduates,” Soc. Indic. Res., vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 155–172, 2011.[24] F. Gonçalves, D. Carneiro, P. Novais, and J. Pêgo, “EUStress: A Human Behaviour Analysis System for Monitoring and Assessing Stress During Exams,” in Intelligent Distributed
Conference Session
Student Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Bala Vignesh Sundaram, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Nadia N. Kellam, Arizona State University; Shawn S. Jordan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student
search of profound empathy in learning relationships: understanding the mathematics of moral learning environments,” J. Moral Educ., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 79–99, Mar. 2010, doi: 10.1080/03057240903528717.[13] M. Goroshit and M. Hen, “Does Emotional Self-efficacy Predict Teachers’ Self-efficacy and Empathy?,” J. Educ. Train. Stud., vol. 2, no. 3, Art. no. 3, May 2014, doi: 10.11114/jets.v2i3.359.[14] S. N. S. Hassan, N. M. Ishak, and M. Bokhari, “Impacts of emotional intelligence (EQ) on work values of high school teachers,” Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 30, no. 0, pp. 1688– 1692, 2011.[15] I. Narinasamy and W. H. W. Mamat, “Caring teacher in developing empathy in moral education,” MOJES Malays. Online J. Educ. Sci
Conference Session
Teaching In and Through Design, Maker Spaces, and Open-ended Problems
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Amit Shashikant Jariwala, Georgia Institute of Technology; Nicholas Greenfield, Georgia Institute of Technology; Emily Orton, Georgia Institute of Technology; Rohan Banerjee, Georgia Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Computational Data Analysis. Interested in industrial automation, product design, high volume manufac- turing, and renewable energy. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Design of a comprehensive system to benchmark makerspacesAbstractMakerspace, a term coined in the early 2000s by MAKE Magazine, is an umbrella term for manyorganizations that share a common goal; to support creative self-efficacy. Makerspaces can beunderstood as the 21st-century evolution of libraries - communities allowing members withshared interests to collaborate on developing ideas while socializing the financial burden ofequipment access and upkeep. A makerspace can look very different
Conference Session
CoNECD Session : Day 2 Slot 1 Technical Session 1
Collection
2021 CoNECD
Authors
Taylor Lightner, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Monica E. Cardella, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Natali Huggins, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Cynthia Hampton, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Walter C. Lee, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; David B. Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity
; Singh, Granville & Dika 2002), with motivation and interest impactingmathematics and science achievement (Singh, Granville & Dika 2002; Eccles & Jacobs 1986). Itis essential, then, to consider what opportunities elementary-aged children have to develop theirbeliefs, interests, and self-efficacy related to STEM.To address the minoritization of underrepresented groups, including girls, many initiatives andinterventions have been developed through STEM programs. For elementary-aged children,these types of programs often take shape as targeted out-of-school programs. Out-of-schoolsettings represent critical opportunities for learning and broadening participation in STEM aschildren spend more than 80% of their waking hours in out-of
Collection
ASEE 2021 Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference
Authors
Monikka M. Mann, Texas Tech University; George Tan, Texas Tech University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
collaborativelearning led to higher levels of student engagement, self-efficacy and desire to complete a STEM majorwhile lowering the sense of competition among the students [33]. This means that cooperative learningcan encourage student academic performance during instructional activities. This means thatcooperative learning can encourage student academic performance during instructional activities. Inaddition to self-efficacy, collaborative learning has positive impacts on student knowledge buildingand ultimately (possibly most importantly) improved course grades [34]. This study, conducted on agroup of 513 students, 16% of whom were female, showed through the use of multivariate analysis Proceedings of the 2021 ASEE Gulf-Southwest
Conference Session
Work-in-Progress Oral Session
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Louis Reis, Louisiana Tech University; Katie A. Evans, Louisiana Tech University; Dexter Cahoy, Louisiana Tech University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
students who did not submit homework (in either format)for that specific quiz topic were removed for the statistical analysis.To assess student perceptions regarding the use of WeBWorK in the course, online pre- and post-course surveys were sent to the students. Both pre- and post-course surveys asked for studentopinions regarding their identity and self-efficacy as engineering students. The post-coursesurvey also had questions measuring the level of agreement to various statements regarding theuse of WeBWorK as a homework delivery system and their experiences with it.Statistical Analysis of Quiz ScoresA binomial generalized linear mixed effect model was used to analyze the data mainly becauseof the variability between baseline student
Conference Session
Capstone Pedgagogy
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Stephen Andrew Wilkerson P.E., York College of Pennsylvania; Stephen Andrew Gadsden, University of Guelph; Elyse Hill
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
capstone design. In themeantime PBO has proven beneficial for this particular capstone design project. Students willbegin delivering data to the farmers for consideration this season.References[1] Zimmerman, Barry J. "Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Anoverview." Educational psychologist 25.1 (1990): 3-17.[2] Pintrich, Paul R., and Elisabeth V. De Groot. "Motivational and self-regulated learningcomponents of classroom academic performance." Journal of educational psychology 82.1(1990): 33.[3] Schunk, Dale H. "Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning." Educationalpsychologist 25.1 (1990): 71-86.[4] Wilkerson, S. A., A. D. Gadsden, and S. A. Gadsden. "An unmanned aerial system for thedetection of crops with
Conference Session
Teamwork and Student Learning in Design
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Marnie V. Jamieson, University of Alberta; John M. Shaw, University of Alberta
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
and team performance. Appraisers’perceptions of potential aversive consequences to them as a result of giving negative as well aspositive feedback (Napier & Latham, 1986) can also impact the ratings given. Whether or notappraisers are in a low self-efficacy or high self-efficacy environment may impact the behaviourof the appraiser as they determine if the appraisal is going to make a difference to their courseoutcome. “Students are, however, willing to penalize peers who do not contribute but often failto differentiate between higher levels of effort.” (Pond, Rehan, &Wade, 1995) At times,instructors require deeper insight into the team environment in order to mentor the team and tounderstand the peer ratings.CATME tools provide
Conference Session
Pre-College: Perceptions and Attitudes on the Pathway to Engineering (2)
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Avneet Hira, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Salsabil Mahmed Salah, FACElab Purdue, Uprise academy; Claudia N. Hurt, FACElab Purdue; Morgan M. Hynes, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education Division
” within an individual. The intellectual “equipment” is comprised of the learner’sknowledge and beliefs, whereas the value-based equipment are solely driven by the learners’personal goals and interests. Also, Deci 10 proposes that learners’ interests motivate them toparticipate in learning activities. According to Atkinson and Wickens 11 this motivation toengage in learning is a function of learners selecting activities that pique their interests, and alsopersisting and making efforts to accomplish goals they find interesting. Further, activities thatcater to students’ interests have also been claimed to be related with self-efficacy, educationalchoices, and career outcomes 12–14. The role of interests and the humanistic nature of
Conference Session
Diversity and Global Experiences
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jamie Gomez, University of New Mexico; Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
, not unlike distillation. Byunderstanding these specific experiences, we can make chemical engineering more relatable tothe students who are least likely to persist.This approach has been shown to be effective in engineering education. For instance, Mejiaidentified Latinx high school students’ funds of knowledge tied to the engineering design process[2], [41], [42], [43]. He found that students were able to build on their everyday experiences toaddress community problems. He also showed that students used professional skills, such ascommunication, collaboration and project management to reach design solutions. This approachalso enhanced students’ self-efficacy [44]. Our own work has built on this approach, finding thatdiverse undergraduate
Conference Session
FOCUS ON EXHIBITS: Welcome Reception & NEW THIS YEAR! 2018 Best Division Paper Nominee Poster Session Sponsored by Engineering Unleashed
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jamie Gomez, University of New Mexico
Tagged Topics
ASEE Headquarters
students’ self-efficacy [44]. Our own work has built on this approach, finding thatdiverse undergraduate students bring engineering assets from their everyday experiences [1-3].Like funds of knowledge, asset-based approaches aim to meet students where they are, valuingtheir experiences and engaging them as co-constructors of their expertise [45].In this study, we extend prior research on asset-based approaches by investigating how to helpstudents see professional skills as assets they and their teammates bring.MethodsWe used the design-based research (DBR) approach to developing and testing our theory thathaving students view their teammates from a strengths-based stance and critically consider theircollective team strengths and gaps would help
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Poster Session
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Magdalini Z. Lagoudas, Texas A&M University; Kristi J. Shryock, Texas A&M University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
advancement of engineering education. CAEE-TR-10-02. 2010, Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education: Seattle, WA, USA.7. Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M., Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences, 1997, Boulder, CO,USA: Westview Press.8. Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., & Bogue, B., Women engineering students and self-efficacy: A multi-year, multi-institution study of women engineering student self-efficacy, Journal of Engineering Education, 2009, Vol. 98, No. 1, pp. 27-38.9. Lord, S. M., Layton, R. A., & Ohland, M. W., Trajectories of electrical engineering and computer engineering students by race and gender, IEEE Transactions on Education, 2011, Vol. 54, No. 4, pp. 610
Conference Session
Environmental Engineering Pedagogy and Innovation
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Walter McDonald, Virginia Tech; Daniel S Brogan, Virginia Tech; Vinod K. Lohani, Virginia Tech; Randel L. Dymond, Virginia Tech
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Environmental Engineering
succeeding, belief in one’sability to succeed and setting goals to achieve. Self-efficacy theory was used by Kamarainen etal.48 in their augmented reality lab. Interest can be assessed using Hidi and Renninger’s49 four-phase model of interest, which increases from fleeting situational interest to long-terminternalized interest. Bloom’s affective taxonomy28 is another important scale of measuringinterest in a topic. Finally, caring contains two major components, i.e. students’ personalinteractions with faculty and students’ perceived level of caring by faculty50.4.0 Experimental Design A mixed methods approach was chosen for the study because it allows for the mostcomplete answer to the research questions through the combination of
Conference Session
New ECE Courses
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Constance D. Hendrix, USAF Academy; Danial J. Neebel PE, US Air Force Academy; Ryan Jay Silva, U.S. Air Force Academy
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
and 4 seek to build intuition and curiosity in the students by providing a broadoverview of EE and CpE. These three goals work together to pique the students’ interest enoughto continue in the major. Conversations with advanced students in the major indicate that a fewwere frustrated by the lack of detail in the first course. Their comments indicate a hunger thatwill be fed as they move through the rest of the major.Another strong motivator for students choosing engineering as a career path is self-efficacy orthe belief in one’s ability to perform a task within a specific domain. If a student believes she orhe will succeed, then success is more likely. Jones and others [7] have shown there is a stronglink between self-efficacy and persistence
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 7
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kate Youmans, Colorado School of Mines
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
anindividualistic culture, plays a critical role in the attrition of students in STEM fields [9]. Further,to support the success of marginalized students, advocates call for changes to address large-scalecultural issues that can lead to academic burnout and emotional exhaustion [1,6].To address these challenges, several studies explored the value of student-professor relationshipsin fostering supportive learning environments. Work by Micari & Pazos [10] found that studentswho had a positive relationship with faculty earned higher grades and were more confident intheir ability to succeed in academically rigorous courses. Vogt [3] explored the impact offaculty-student interactions on students’ self-efficacy, academic confidence, and critical
Conference Session
Pedagogy and Instructional Practices
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rohini N. Abhyankar, Penn State University, State College; Sarah E. Zappe, Penn State University; Stephanie Cutler, Penn State University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
disciplines, CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(3), ar46, 2020.[18] C. S. Dweck, “Mindset: The new psychology of success,” Random House, 2006.[19] R. W. Hass, J. Katz-Buonincontro, and R. Reiter-Palmon, “Disentangling creative mindsets from creative self- efficacy and creative identity: Do people hold fixed and growth theories of creativity?” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(4), 436, 2016.[20] K. Schumann, J. Zaki, and C.S. Dweck, “Addressing the empathy deficit: beliefs about the malleability of empathy predict effortful responses when empathy is challenging,” Journal of Personality and social psychology, 107(3), 475, 2014.[21] Q. Cutts, E. Cutts, S. Draper, P. O'Donnell, and P. Saffrey