sustainability module into first-year courses for civil and environmental engineering students. J. Profes. Iss. Eng. Edu. Pract., 137, pp. 78–8510. Stolk J. 2015. Can Disciplinary Integration Promote Students’ Lifelong Learning Attitudes and Skills in Project-Based Engineering Courses? International Journal Of Engineering Education ·11. Aktas, C., Whelan, R., Stoffer H., Todd, E., Kern, C. 2015. Developing a University-Wide Course on Sustainability: a Critical Evaluation of Planning and Implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production 106, 216- 22112. Oswald Beiler, M. and Evans, J. (2014). "Teaching Sustainability Topics to Attract and Inspire the Next Generation of Civil Engineers." J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract
. Figure 8: Survey Results.Future WorkCurrently, the review modules on Mathematics of Engineering and Microprocessor are beingclass-tested in their respective undergraduate courses at the School of Electrical and ElectronicEngineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.The next phase of the development of OnTEn website is to add more engineering contents. Tothis end, we have visited a number of universities in several countries and plan to continue thevisits to several other universities. The universities visited so far are the University of SouthernCalifornia, Los Angeles, California (USA); University of California, Davis, California (USA);California State University, Northridge, California (USA); Chinese University of Hong Kong(Hong
classroom (located at the second floor of the building).When the two groups were separated, their means of communication changed. They decided to use an instantmessenger to communicate throughout the workday but often found it difficult to understand one another. Toremedy the problem, the two groups set designated times for video chat meetings before lunch and beforeeach workday ended. After encountering some difficulties with this method, a leader was elected in eachgroup and the leaders were allowed to meet in person at the end of each workday to discuss the progressmade that-day and plans for the following day. The forced separation also introduced technical difficulties.Although the requirement for the project was identified and documented
time the course is taught.They also have the option of using a different software that they are comfortable with and haveaccess to. One of the groups opted to use HyperMesh and OptiStruct as they were planning onusing that software to design bridges for the SAMPE student bridge contest. Students getintroduced to the composites workbench in the surfacing class with CATIA and strengthen theirknowledge about how models are designed using orthotropic materials. Two lectures are setaside to instruct the students with the FEA laboratory. Examples of a model setup and thedisplacement results obtained by one of the student groups for flexural testing are given below(Figures 1 & 2.) Figure 1. CATIA model of flexural test using Figure 2. FEA
applicable to trying to explain their career plans.The SCCT model has 4 core variables: self-efficacy beliefs, outcome expectations, interests, andgoals. In a study of 579 male and female college students (sophomores) in Spain, there were “nostatistically significant differences in outcome expectations or goals.”15 This was based onquestions related to a students’ appreciation for an engineering degree positively influencingtheir professional career, and on the extent of their academic plans. The students were also askedabout their level of confidence in earning high marks on courses with basic requirements forengineering majors, and on their interest in engineering related activities such as solvingmathematical problems. The answers indicate that
expertise include process modeling, simulation, and process control.Dr. Thomas Tretter, University of Louisville Thomas Tretter is professor of science education and director of the Gheens Science Hall & Rauch Plan- etarium at the University of Louisville. His scholarship includes collaborative efforts with science and engineering faculty targeting retention of STEM majors in entry-level STEM courses. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 The Step-outs to Stars Engineering Retention FrameworkAbstract This research paper, grounded in Expectancy-Value Theory, investigates the relationshipbetween interest, first semester GPA and first year retention in engineering
focus on 32 of the student responses since one ofthe students did not respond to this study’s key questions. All student survey questionswill be referenced by using SQ#, where SQ indicates it is a question from the studentsurvey and # being replaced by the referred question number. SQ2: University of Arkansas Student ID Number SQ4: Gender SQ5: Ethnicity SQ6: Race SQ7: What degree plan are you most interested in? SQ8: Please indicate if you experienced any of the following activities prior to coming to the U of A (check all that apply)? SQ14: What is your perception of current job opportunities for industrial engineering (7 point Likert scale – very bad to very good
time? following job or work activities in the first five - Ask a lot of questions years after you graduate? - Generate new ideas by observing the - Searching out new technologies, processes, world techniques, and/or product ideas - Experiment as a way to understand - Generating creative ideas how things work - Promoting and championing ideas to others - Actively search for new ideas through - Investigating and securing resources experimenting needed to implement new ideas - Build a large network of contacts with - Developing adequate plans and
Paper ID #16487Preliminary Analysis of Spatial Ability Improvement within an EngineeringMechanics Course: StaticsSteven David Wood, Utah State University - Engineering Education Steven Wood is a junior in the Civil Engineering program. After finishing his BS he plans on completing a MS in Civil Engineering. In addition to studies, he is a teacher’s assistant and he teaches a recitation class for the Statics course. His Interests in the field of engineering are public transportation, specifically in rapid and heavy rail systems. His research interests include spatial ability, learning styles, and gender differences in
”) Relationship between engineers and the public (e.g., “Cross Disciplinary”, “Collaborative”) Engineers social footprint over time (e.g., “Increasing”) 4 Societal problems/issues in need of engineering solutions (e.g., “Physical Infrastructure Stresses”)A fuller discussion of emerging themes and their prevalence in engineering documents will beready for inclusion in the poster as part of this session.The research plan moving forward includes interviews with engineering students, faculty, andprofessionals, drawing upon the themes discovered in the professional documents analysis andfrom the theoretical foundation in social imaginaries
activities related to3D printing as common elements of the engineering design process in general, and rapidprototyping in particular. ABS and PLA 3D-printing materials were regarded as environmentallyresponsible products. Community involvement and appreciation of the sustainability efforts inthe department’s 3D-printing lab were unintended positive results.With further improvements of the desktop recycling system, new opportunities may arise. Forexample, the sustainable 3D-printing lab may accept 3D-printed recyclable materials from othereducational institutions in the area. Also, commercial applications could be developed to helprecycling efforts in 3D-printing shops and makerspaces. Further research is planned to includerecyclability
and accompanying program schedule animations, slideshows based on unique Everyone plays each team’s exergame needs of their schools 6-Sat Each team presents afterschool implementation plans, anticipated issues TECHFIT graduationTeachers are provided with a 230-page, lab-based workbook that includes lessons over the PDclassroom content. In addition to step-by-step, illustrated instructions, each lesson maps thecontent to state and national standards for grades 6-8. This feature allows teachers to integratesome of what
research on team learning processes in engineering student project teams. Additionally, she has co-developed a framework for measuring and interpreting an array of team dynamics. An online assessment tool has been created based on this framework which allows teams to diagnose and improve the ”health” of their team. She is passionate about her area of research and plans to continue conducting research on factors that contribute to effective teamwork.Ms. Genevieve Hoffart, University of Calgary Genevieve is a first year M.Sc. student under the supervision of Dr. Thomas O’Neill at the University of Calgary focusing on at team dynamics, training, and communication. She has been working with the Schulich School of
program. Ourcareful planning has supported the success of the program and preparation of our students.Our biggest concern now is how to support this program once funding from CIRM ends. Whilethere are potential workarounds for the cost of running our laboratory courses, our largest costsare associated with the stipend our students receive during their 9-month internship. Studentscurrently receive a stipend of $2,652 a month for their internship. For 10 students, this costamounts to $238,680 for the duration of their internship. From discussions with our AdvisoryCommittee, this is a necessary component of the internship portion of our program. We arecurrently looking at various alternatives to support the continuation of the program as it
is acomponent where soft skills were developed12. The project was an open-ended problem whereteam members had to think about safety and functionality, and at the same time team membersdeveloped and applied skills on teamwork, project planning, economics, and communication7.The key difference was the domain where the students had to develop their project, the projectwas not a typical application of what they have learned in their coursework, but at the same timethis project presented the opportunity to illustrate a common situation that students will be facedonce they apply (and get) a technical job. It brings to light one of the message that are usuallyoffered in design courses where open-ended and different application domains are
educationprofessionals to improve delivery and assessment is ongoing, and processes to promotetransferability of research findings are under development.References: 1. American Society for Mechanical Engineering web site, accessed May 6, 2014: “Washington Policy Report May 2013.” 2. FEDERAL SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS (STEM) EDUCATION 5-YEAR STR ATEGIC PLAN, A Report from the Committee on STEM Education National Science and Technology Council, May 2013 3. National Academy of Engineering (2014), Making a World of Difference, National Academies Press. 4. National Academy of Engineering, Grand Challenges for Engineering, www.engineeringchallenges.org, updated 9/2013. 5. Johnson, Steven (2012). Future Perfect
should be subjected to further structural analysisto provide insight on each of these other forms of validity.Using data collected from design thinking students, future analysis is planned to compare thegroup design decision results to constructs known to negatively impact decision making, such aswithin group conflict, to illuminate discriminant validity. Outcomes of effective decisionmaking, such as high quality decisions and satisfaction with the decision, will also be used toshow criterion validity and see if the instrument is useful for predicting future attitudes.Positive student perceptions of effective decision making are necessary antecedents for actuallyusing a good decision making process. However, another concern for validity is the
gaps rather than simply correcting errors in the students’ approach. The team must have itsdesign approved (typically after a revision) before they are allowed to run experiments in thevirtual laboratory.The team then undergoes the process of iterative experimental design by planning experiments,analyzing data, developing models, and identifying strategies. This process is punctuated by aTeam Update Meeting (TUM) with the team and the instructor, which has a similar structure tothe first meeting. Finally, the team submits a process recipe (or multiple recipes for multiplereactors) for release to high volume manufacturing and presents an oral and written report. Afterthe ten-minute oral presentation, an interactive questioning process between
Understands/works within the culture of the group Work Culture Respects diversity Recognizes political/social implications of actions Manages projects and/or other resources effectively Sets goals and prioritizes Organization Planning Manages several tasks at once Allocates time to meet deadlines Professional attitude toward work assigned Quality of work produced Evaluation of Work Habits
Healthcurriculum.To date, 28 ENGR 102 HSteachers have receivedtraining on some or all four ofthe GC DELI hybrid units.Ten of those 28 ENGR 102HS teachers have used all orsome portions of the GCDELI hybrid units with theirstudents over the two years the program has been Figure 2. Teachers at the 2013 ENGR implemented and a total of 21 102 HS summer workshop design and build a biomechanical hand prototype teachers have plans for using straws, string, duct tape, and implementation during the rubber gloves. This activity is part of the added material for the GC DELI AY 2014-15. Engineering Better Human Health
Paper ID #12159Green Chocolate? - Investigating the Sustainable Development of ChocolateManufacturing in a Laboratory-Based Undergraduate Engineering CourseProf. Alexander Vincent Struck Jannini, Rowan University Alexander Struck Jannini is an adjunct professor at Rowan University. His previous work has been focused on incorporating aspects of pharmaceutical engineering into the undergraduate curriculum. Alex plans on continuing his education and receiving a Ph.D. in chemical engineering. His areas of interest are drug delivery and drug loading characteristics of dissolvable thin films.Dr. Mary Staehle, Rowan University
instructor and TA, project management and plan significance of project, hands-onexperience, and team work, which positively contribute to project success. On the contrary,various de-motivating factors considered as barriers for the project contain the following, suchas heavy workload, time management, simulation instability, team communication, hardwareinsufficiency, and difficulty in debugging, illustrated in Figure 9. Amongst these factors,difficulty in debugging, and team communication are two of the highest difficulty that need tobe improved and overcome [10]. Page 26.831.12 Figure 7 Self-assessment comparison of fellow students and
. For evaluating their performance we designed assessmentsusing pre-test and post-test questions with the same questions about continuity and pressure drop,with the pre-test being taken at the beginning of the semester and the post-test just before thesemester’s end. After the implementation we did in the chemical engineering class, we designeda new system to mimic neuronal membranes, planned for demonstration in a bioengineeringclass. This system involves fluid flow from a reservoir through tubing past a dual ionophore Ion Page 26.837.2Selective Electrode (di-ISE) / reference electrode system with flow returning to a reservoir. Wereport on both
various strategies employed to mitigate those costs. In a further analysis, the utilityseen by returners was analyzed inductively, and it was found that there were three types of utilityvalue: plans to pursue an academic career, the wish to advance in an existing career path, and thewish to re-direct an industry career path into a different area of industry.9 Page 26.859.3Ongoing research efforts are contrasting them with direct-pathway students, those who do nottake a break of any significant length between undergraduate and graduate study, and examiningthe ways in which the two groups are similar and different.10,11 However, these research
perceived little value in exit tickets, which are generally designed to develop criticalmetacognitive skills and improved self-efficacy.These challenges are neither new nor unique to the current course. In fact, these are topics wellknown and widely discussed in the educational literature.13,15 It is the plan in future POGILimplementations to move the course towards a mastery driven rather than performance drivenassessment strategy. Specifically, the goal will be to reduce reliance on a few high stakes examby instead providing multiple paths, activities, and opportunities for students build self-efficacyand demonstrate mastery of the stated learning objectives. This approach is particularly attractivein a large format classroom, where managing make
for “conducting a market analysis.” Theengineering students started out unsure of their ability to conduct a market analysis, probablyeven inflating their confidence beyond what they should have reported. But the project forcedthem to plan and execute such a market analysis, attempting them to think beyond what theythought was a good idea, and consider what their prospective customers would think – indeed, ifthe product would sell, or if their customers would pay more for the proposed improvements indesign and sustainability.Students also grew in their confidence to creatively solve problems. They saw that, when theyforced themselves to contemplate a problem for an extended time and from a number of different
Page 26.918.3 Faculty observation of the freshman students as well as both solicited and unsolicited student comments suggest that thegoal of building community was achieved. Faculty observed that students were more engaged and willing to ask questions inclass, spent more time talking and working with other students outside of class, and generally seemed to have formed a cohortthat included all of their classmates. Students demonstrated a higher level of interest in the program, with more than half thestudents asking faculty for help with outside projects. Students expressed enthusiasm for the student club and asked the student mentors to include more advanced projects. Asoriginally planned, projects were based on simple discrete
manufacturing competitiveness and understand how to create competitive advantage through manufacturing planning, strategy and control.M4. Graduates are able to design manufacturing systems through the analysis, synthesis, and control of manufacturing operations using statistical and calculus based methods, simulation, and information technology.M5. Graduates have had laboratory experiences which enable them to measure manufacturing process variables and make technical inferences about the process.Only M2 and M3 were employed during the assessment process. However, this portion of the Page 24.1354.9assessment needs to be improved by including measures
side-to-side balance? With these preliminary questions, the students would have adirection for what they are measuring and need to figure out how. A second improvement wouldbe to further stress the importance of controlling variables that you are not directly measuring.This would include the way each subject performs the test, how the data is recorded, etc. It is notexpected that a perfect experiment will be run and not controlling some things actually teachesthe students the importance of doing so, but these were items that the students in the pilotsemester specifically mentioned. Making sure future students try to control at least one of thesevariables would illustrate how you need a structured plan and still demonstrate howenvironmental
characteristics, self-assessments of selected learning outcomes,and future career plans. The survey also queried students‟ perceptions of classroom practices,out-of-class interactions with faculty, and extracurricular experiences. Chairs were askedquestions about their curriculum, educational support programs, and promotion and tenurepractices. Faculty members responded to questions (similar to those posed to chairs) about theirprograms. Faculty members also reported on the emphasis they give to the attributes specified inthe National Academy‟s “E2020” report, the teaching practices they employ in a course theyteach regularly, and on their level of agreement with the goals of the NAE report. Associatedeans of undergraduate engineering responded to