. Theseinclude online quizzes before class and a large library of external links that are used forresources. A sample of the first two weeks are displayed in Figure 1. Notice that the plan isdivided into inside and outside class activities, all of which are thoughtfully designed to addmeaning and content to the course. These activities (a) get students ready or prepared forclass, (b) give them opportunities to practice—with prompt feedback via the Wileyplusplatform—doing whatever it is you want them to learn to do, and (c) allow them to reflect ontheir learning. The objective is to produce a sequence of activities that build on each other. Oneparticular activity was the construction of a poster and presentation of a real life failure event,sample of
AC 2009-651: DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SCORING RUBRICS FORTECHNICAL COURSES IN TWO-YEAR COLLEGESFarzin Heidari, Texas A&M University, Kingsville Page 14.412.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Design and Implementation of Scoring Rubrics for Technical Courses in Two-Year CollegesAbstract:The process of assessment is to measure student performance. Instructors need to make sure thatthe assignments are scored as objectively as possible when evaluating a project. A rubric helpsto set clear expectations and defines the quality of work for a given project. Descriptive scoringschemes have become a common method for evaluating
, uncertainty analysis, inverse heat transfer, radiation heat transfer, applied math, theoretical and applied control systems, piezoelectric sensors, electrical power system generation and distribution, and redundant measurement systems.B. Hodge, Mississippi State University B. K. Hodge is Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Mississippi State University (MSU) where he serves as the TVA Professor of Energy Systems and the Environment and is a Giles Distinguished Professor and a Grisham Master Teacher. He is a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers and an Associate Fellow of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
protection scheme may beinstalled. As an essential part of this laboratory, a real-time monitoring and control systemmust be developed with the capability of controlling all protection and switching devices.Users of this remote lab will simply be web clients with a variable-permission protocol formonitoring and/or control of different parts of the system. Continuously updated experimentscan be designed, tested and made available for use by clients.Sample Laboratory ActivitiesThe following activities may be performed remotely via virtual user interfaces:1. Transformer Performance a. Record one set of instantaneous values for the input and output voltages and current in addition to their phase relationships. b. Knowing predetermined values of
(N=10)participating in an NSF-funded Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) program at alarge research university. Positive learning outcomes gains pertained to communication skills,validation of career path, experimentation skills, valuing cross-disciplinary expertise and lifelonglearning, and gaining confidence in working independently. Low ranked learning outcomespertained to (a) leadership skills, (b) project management skills, (c) understanding ethical issues,and (d) identifying problems. Further, qualitative data analysis revealed that undergraduateresearchers faced a number of challenges and frustrations pertinent to (a) scheduling, (b) timemanagement, (c) running experiments with limited familiarity to instruments and
, won a National Science Foundation Research Initiation Award in 1990, the 1992 IEEE Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Myril B. Reed Best Paper Award, and the Georgia Tech Outstanding Thesis Advisor Award in 2003. He has graduated twenty three PhD students from his research group and has six U.S. patents awarded. He has published more than 120 articles in technical Journals and Proceedings, and articles on his work have appeared in several trade publications. Dr. Brooke is a senior member of the IEEE.Philip Ethier, Duke University Philip D. Ethier received the B.S.E.E. Degree from Duke University in 2009. He has been instrumental in the development of the RF development board
this model? b. How good are those assumptions? c. How can you test those assumptions? d. Is this an upper or lower estimate? 7) Estimate the final temperature a. What assumptions went into this model? b. How good are those assumptions? c. How can you test those assumptions? d. Is this an upper or lower estimate? 8) How much work was done during the process a. What assumptions went into this model? b. How good are those assumptions? Page 14.881.5 c. How can you test those assumptions? d. Is this an upper or lower estimate? 9) Upon completion
Engineer in the Real World”Key words: “project-based learning,” “international,” “assessment”IntroductionThe quotation in the title of this paper is a student’s statement about the future impact of hisproject-abroad experience in South Africa. Indeed, study-abroad and project-abroad experiencesare increasingly viewed as important for engineering students’ careers. Assessing the studentlearning outcomes of such programs can benefit (a) the students, as they engage in self-reflectionand communication about their experience, (b) the study-abroad program itself, for continualimprovement, and (c) the engineering education community at large, as it seeks effectivemethods and models for preparing engineers for their work. To
and statements can vary among the campuses, therecords for the titles in the union catalog need to be consistent and display the shared printlocation. Cooperation and input among NRLF staff, the UC Berkeley systems department, andthe California Digital Library was vital for allowing this to happen with a minimum of delay.Below are two examples of records from the union catalog that reflect combined UC Berkeleyand UC Davis contributions.IEEE Micro holdings and MARC 852 field display in the Melvyl union catalog:NRLF UC Shared Print-1 Circ status University of California Libraries - Building Use Only v.1(Feb 1981)-24(2004), 26(2006)-27(2007)852 |a GLAD |b UL01 |j XXX Shared Print-1 |3 v.1
StrumKenny, Chair, University of Stony Brook. Reinventing Undergraduate Education: Three YearsAfter the Boyer Report, 2002.[15] National Science Foundation, “Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement,”www.nsf.gov, NSF 03-558, 2003.[16] B. Moskal, D. Lasich, N. Middleton, “Improving the Retention of Women and Minoritiesthrough Research Experience, Mentoring and Financial Assistance,” Proceedings of theAmerican Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, session 1392, pp. 1-11, 2001.[17] D. Niemeier, R. Boulanger, P. Bayly, S. Schmid, K. Muraleetharan, and A. Barros,“Integration of engineering education and research: perspectives from the NSF civil andmechanical systems 1998 CAREER workshop,” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 199-202
. Elastic materials: students will explore the connection between thespring constant and Young’s modulus. Particulate nature of matter: By modeling a solid as smallmasses connected by springs, calculate the interatomic spring constant using Young’s modulusand estimated atomic spacing. (Interestingly, the stiffness of the interatomic bond for typicalmetals is comparable to the stiffness of springs that the students use in the Hooke’s law activity.)Distinguish proportionality from linear relationships, that is, recognize the significance of theintercept. (b) Quadratic relationships. Investigate the energy stored in a spring. Connect torelated systems in students’ experiences.Oscillating systems. Investigate sinusoidal functions, both mathematically
Jeanne Christman is an Assistant Professor in the department of Electrical, Computer and Telecommunications Engineering Technology at the Rochester Institute of Technology. She is currently the Program Chair for the Computer Engineering Technology Program. Christman received her B. S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Clarkson University and her M. S. in Computer Science from the University of Texas at Dallas. Christman is the coordinator for the Engineering Girl Scout Badge workshop at RIT. She also tracks retention data for the female students in the Engineering Technology departments.Teresa Wolcott, Rochester Institute of Technology Teresa Wolcott has a Bachelor of Science degree in
portionsof the course that center on hypothetical and scientific reasoning. Students explore thefour stages of hypothetical method: a. occurrence of a problem, b. formulating ahypothesis, c. drawing implications from the hypothesis and c. testing the hypothesis. Anexample discussed in length is the historic theory of Spontaneous Generation. What arethe roots of the theory? How was the original hypothesis investigated and finallydisconfirmed? Students are also introduced to accepted differences in science andsuperstition and the three underlying principles that must hold true if an event is held tobe “science.” These principles are: evidentiary support, objectivity and integrity all whichare vital concepts for designing and or conducting experiments
. Theproject is a good example of what one can come-up with using the multiple NXT LEGOsets rather than using simply one NXT kit, and it is worth trying out as a starting projectfor freshmen students in engineering schools at the university level [7] . Figure 4.1 (a) and (b) multi- NXT Ball Grabber robot UND design team4.2. Phase II – Promoting programming and circuitry concepts4.2.1 – Building programming experience Page 14.4.6 6 There are several items that should interest educators here – first, the entirecustomized LabView program is completely
AC 2009-2519: MODELING, RAPID PROTOTYPING, CASTING, CNCPRODUCING, AND COMPARING THE MECHANICAL PROPERTIESRichard Griffin, Texas A&M University, QatarReza Rowshan, Texas A&M University, Qatar Page 14.882.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Comparing the Mechanical Properties for an Al Alloy in the Cast and Wrought Condition using the Identical Solid Model Dr. Richard B. Griffin and Dr. Reza Rowshan Mechanical Engineering Texas A&M University at Qatar Doha, QatarAbstractJunior level mechanical engineering students
for Engineering and Technology Education. Research in Engineering and Technology Education. Retrieved Jan 2008 from http://ncete.org/flash/research/Report%20_Yong-Duncan_.pdf23. Goodman, I., Cunninghan, C. (2002). Final report of the women’s experiences in college and engineering (WECE) project. Retrieved September 16, 2005, from http://www. grginc.com/WECE_FINAL_REPORT.pdf24. Heyman, G., Martyna, B., & Bhatia, S. (2002). Gender and achievement-related beliefs among engineering students. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. (8)1, 41-53.25. Astin, A., & Oseguera, L. (2005). Pre-college and institutional influences on degree attainment. In A. Seidman (Ed.), College student
carboncomposites. The proposed course will be useful in securing high tech jobs particularly where thereengineering skills are essential. Page 14.815.4Bibliography1. Daniel I. M.; Ishai Ori; 1994, “Engineering Mechanics of Composite Materials”, Oxford University Press2. Strong A. B.; 1989, “Fundamentals of Composite Manufacturing: Materials, Methods, and Applications”, Society of Manufacturing Engineers3. Kelkar Ajit D., Bolick Ronnie, Krishnan Vijay, and Craft William J., “Professional Development and Awareness Building For Teachers in the Area of Advanced Materials”; 2006 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Chicago, June 2006
Name AffiliationDr. Eyad H Abed University of Maryland Dr. Shield B Lin Prairie View A&M UniversityDean Ilesanmi Adesida University of Illinois at Dr. Michael Lovell University of Pittsburgh Nano-CEMMSDr. William A Baeslack The Ohio State University Mr. Matthew Meyer North Carolina Community College SystemsDr. Ragu Venkataramanan Purdue University Dean Habib P Southern University
contrast is builtaround collaboration. E-learning 2.0 assumes that knowledge is socially constructed. Advocatesof social learning claim that one of the best ways to learn something is to teach it to others.ELearning can provide major benefits for the organizations and individuals involved: ̇ Virtual environment allows some reduction of paper usage. ̇ Reduction of the costs of higher education. ̇ The time to update content as well as their correction is very low. ̇ The perception of the learner is a livelier interaction and a richer content.Blended learningBlended learning (b-learning) has allowed a new way of convergence between distance, on-lineand on-class education. The convergence is going through the mixed educational modelinvolving
weir at two differentunknown pump settings. Then they were asked to find the flow rate in the channel andcompare among the weirs. Page 14.58.3Figure 2. One cubic foot desktop learning module with open channel ontop. (a) (b) (c)Figure 3. (a) Underflow weir and hydraulic jump (b) 45o V-notch weir (c) rectangular Page 14.58.4weir.Assessment Methods:Concepts inventories were prepared according to the instructor’s choice of conceptualquestions. Two slightly different sets of questions
Assessment Criterion 2 by Bridge Design Project (Supporting Evidence) Outcomes a-k Pratt bridge truss, Warren truss, HoweRecognize different types of trusses b,f roof truss, Fink roof truss Axial tension, bending, and axialIdentify forces in structures
formatted’, to comments that were highly specific, such assuggesting a different equation representation of a concept.Web-based Resources RatingsThe second method of assessment was a student survey that gathers feedback fromstudents after each administration of the course. The survey7 consists of 18 items thataddress four major domains: 1) Content Factors, 2) Learning Factors, 3) UsabilityFactors, and 4) Technological Factors (see Appendix B). A four-point scale is utilized onthe survey, ranging from ‘Poor’ (value = 1) to ‘Excellent’ (value = 4) and wasadministered to students over eight semesters of delivery of the course, from the spring of2004 to the summer of 2008. Classes ranged in size from 19 (Spring 2004) to 60(Summer 2007).The first domain
the new paradigm, advisors have a scheduled meeting at the same time each week for eachproject team they are advising. This meeting time is built into the faculty member’s scheduleand is documented on his/her door card. At each meeting, advisors review the group’s Ganttchart3 (once it has been developed), and review each student’s design log book. The meeting isdocumented on the Faculty Advisor Meeting Log Sheet (Appendix B), including items discussedas well as outstanding issues and action items.Another major element of the new paradigm is the Faculty Advisor Approvals Form(Appendix C). There are numerous milestones throughout the course, and it was felt that thefaculty advisor should have approval authority of major milestones before the
. Figure 3: Current density as a function of electrode gap. (a) (b) Figure 4: Effect of frequency on machined feature sizes. Page 14.524.7 3,500,000 3,000,000 Closed Loop 24 Vpp 2,500,000 MRR (µm3/ sec) Open Loop 24 Vpp 2,000,000 Theory
the grading has a large weight on weekly assignments and the final project,including reports. Finally, as we employ some active learning techniques, we give points forparticipation and team work by using an online collaboration tool called Ubiquitous Presenterfrom UCSD11.Module List1. Introduction. Basic outline of course. Relationship between human body functions, signals and communications. a. Course policies and outline b. Modern Biomedical environment. c. Chain Human --> Signals --> Sensors --> Acquisition --> Preprocessing --> Communications --> Storage and Processing. d. Principles of networking2. Systems 1: Principles of operating systems, installation and VMware. a. Allocation
chosen field; (5) Increase students’ interest and knowledgeregarding graduate education; (6) Encourage minority engineering undergraduates to attendgraduate school and increase the number who receive graduate degrees.Current metrics to measure success of the TREX program include the following: (1) Increasedapplicant pool to TREX; (2) Student Research Plans, Progress Reports, & Final Reports; (3)Student evaluations; (4) Faculty evaluations; (5) Matriculation of TREX participants (a.)Graduated from Cockrell School of Engineering, (b.) Entering workforce, (c.) Entering graduateschool.Since 1992, TREX has produced valuable research opportunities during the academic year for
percentage of students who passed each course, and theaverage grade point achieved in each course. Note that a grade of C or better is required toadvance to the next MATH course at the UofA, and withdrawals are not included in grade pointaverages. Average A B C D F W Total % Passing Grade Point GNEG 1111 194 56 31 14 21 19 335 88% 3.2 MATH 1203 0 1 5 1 4 5 16 38% 1.3 MATH 1285 15 20 13 10 9 5 72 67% 2.3 MATH 2554 12 34 32 18 19
-k.Criteria and expected measuresOur program’s ABET outcomes at the outset of our information literacy mapping process wereas shown in Table 1, with mappings to ABET’s a-k as indicated:Table 1: Smith College and ABET Outcomes Picker Engineering Program Outcome ABET Criterion 3 Outcomes (a-k)1. Conceptual Analysis: a conceptual understanding of a. an ability to apply knowledge of engineering science fundamentals mathematics, science, and engineering2. Mathematical Analysis: the ability to quantitatively analyze b. an ability to design and conduct experiments, a component, process, or system using theoretical as well as to analyze and
(1929–1982) Carlo Castigliano (1847–1884) Eugene C. Figg (1936–2002) Friedrich Engesser (1848–1931) Charles H. Thornton (b. 1940) Robert Maillart (1872–1940) Ray W. Clough (b. 1920)Figure 1 - Suggested famous structural engineersThurston(3) notes that only a small percentage of groups presented a satisfactory visualdemonstration. In order to increase the number of groups that satisfactorily fulfill thedemonstration requirements, students are shown a PowerPoint(7) presentation of past vis-ual demonstrations with examples of excellent and sub-par demonstrations. This presen-tation is shown to the students during the first week of class with the intent of giving thestudents a better understanding of the expected
. Page 14.413.6Sensor Installation:Mounting devices (see Figure 8) were designed with SolidWorks® to attach the two pieces (one slidingpiece and one fixed) of the linear displacement sensor to the plunger and the syringe case, respectively.An “L”-shaped bracket holds the sliding bar of the displacement sensor and attaches it to the plunger(Figure 8 (b)); a sheath device holds the fixed part of the displacement sensor to the syringe case (Figure8 (a)). The force sensor is glued to the upper surface of the L-shaped device (see Figure 8 (c)). Force (b) (a) (c