. Zhang, H. Wiedmann, and X. Feng, “Simulating Industry: A Holistic Approach for Bridging the Gap between Engineering Education and Industry. Part I: A Conceptual Framework and Methodology*,” Tempus, Stroud, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom, 2015.[5] S. S. Rosa, D. M. F. Prazeres, A. M. Azevedo, and M. P. C. Marques, “mRNA vaccines manufacturing: Challenges and bottlenecks,” Vaccine, vol. 39, no. 16, pp. 2190–2200, Apr. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.038.[6] T. W. Simpson and J. R. R. A. Martins, “Multidisciplinary Design Optimization for Complex Engineered Systems: Report From a National Science Foundation Workshop,” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 133, no. 10, Sep. 2011
challenging yearfor summer programming, the 2021 virtual cohort proved a unique opportunity to pilotDISTINCTION overall, but also to learn of methods that could reach students in future cohortsthat might be limited due to programmatic funding constraints associated with the cost ofresidential summer programs.References[1] London, J. S., Lee, W. C., Watford, B. A., Ash, C. H., Holloman, T., Pee, C. M., &Hampton, C. (2022). Climbing uphill: Toward a common agenda for the advancement of BlackAmericans in engineering. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering,28(3).[2] Understanding and Offsetting Financial Barriers for Black Students in Science,Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.17226/26576.[3] T. K. Holloman
had trouble figuring out this section from 1.05 and am still confused about it. I know that 0 indicated a positive sign but I didn't know how and where to place 0's and 1's on the chart. But I believe after you get the smallest values, you then convert it to decimal format for the final answer. 2. Meme 2024 ASEE Southeastern Section Conference3. Tweet “Most of the Newton-Raphson method was easy, but the questions where we had to geometrically find where the tangent intersects the x- axis take a while. There's a lot of room for error; it can be so annoying
Coordinate in a point that Anchoring a Suitable Coordinate captures the system symmetry will be tremendously helpful for 3 System the students in the simplification of the model used to describe the hydrodynamics. This characterization may be inferred by studying the Characterizing the Type of Flow 4 characteristics of the flow in the system and the direction/s this inside the Control Domain flow goes and it will allow students to make decisions, properly
Success T1 T2 T3 Average First to Third Attempt 74% 82% 56% 70% Figure 2: Percentage Increase in Success Between the First and the Third Attempts (within Excel Approximations)Figure 2 shows the improvement percentage success for T1 to be 74%, 82% for T2, but only 56%in T3. T3’s improvement is nonetheless, relatively lower because a lot of students realized theypassed the course by the first attempt of T3, or got the grade they sought and were satisfied thatthey did not continue to improve their grade anymore. Also, some students worked
(tetrafluoroethylene): A Virtuous Cycleof Wear Reduction and Tribochemical Accumulation", The Journal of Phyical Chemistry C 2021,125, 19417−194276. Hasan Muhandes, Ádám Kalácska, László Székely , Róbert Keresztes and Gábor Kalácska,"Abrasive Sensitivity of Engineering Polymers and a Bio-Composite under Di_erent AbrasiveConditions", Materials 2020, 13, 52397. A.P. Harsha, "An investigation on low stress abrasive wear characteristics of high performanceengineering thermoplastic polymers", Wear 271 (2011) 942– 9518. R. Tarodiya, A. Levy, "Erosion of polymers and polymer composites surfaces by particles",Advanced Powder Technology 32 (2021) 3149–31599. S. Soleimani, J. Sukumaran, A. Kumcu, P. De Baets, W. Philips, "Quantifying abrasion andmicro-pits in polymer
-9.[9] K. L. Dickson and M. D. Miller, "Authorized crib cards do not improve exam performance," Teaching of Psychology, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 230-233, 2005.[10] B. G. Johnson and C. S. Sargent, "Impact of formulas, language and instruction on student performance on cost-volume-profit problems," Accounting Education, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 22-41, 2014.[11] N. Mathew, "Student preferences and performance: A comparison of open-book, closed book, and cheat sheet exam types," 2012 NCUR, 2012.[12] D. Visco, S. Swaminathan, L. Zagumny, and H. Anthony, "Interpreting Student Constructed Study Guides," in 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, 2007, pp. 12.955. 1-12.955. 10
distributed to the students inboth sections. Questions addressed students’ familiarity and experiences with Generative AI andtheir opinions about its use in academic and professional settings, as well as its overall risks andbenefits. In Class 1, 59 students responded, and in Class 2, 34 students responded to the survey.The responses were anonymous; the instructors only categorized responses by section. Figures1–6 below show the two sections’ responses to the first 6 questions.Figure 1. Rate your familiarity with Generative AIComparing the two classes’ responses, the most significant differences are in the responses“never used” and “not very familiar.” In Class 2 (no instruction), over a third of the studentschose “never used” (34%), while Class 1’s
investigation into fuzzing within our environment. Weaim to incorporate different types of fuzzers that impact PCG elements of the game (i.e., storygeneration, content generation), the interface, and the overall gameplay itself. Our goal is todiscover potential problems within our environment while minimizing the amount of requiredtest cases generated. Another direction for research is in search-based testing, or usingevolutionary computation-based techniques for generating test cases. Last, we intend to continuedeveloping the game itself for use in outreach activities and further research endeavors.AcknowledgementsFinancial support for this project was provided by RISE (www.gvsu.edu/rise), which is fundedby a National Science Foundation S-STEM award
Strength/Weight Experiment 1 2 3 Average S/N STD 1 37.94 39.08 39.73 38.92 31.80 0.74 2 33.54 38.93 29.75 34.08 30.49 3.77 3 19.17 20.19 19.02 19.46 25.77 0.52 4 21.59 21.50 21.16 21.42 26.62 0.19 5 28.30 28.34 12.47 23.03 25.26 7.47 6 29.00 27.08 28.81 28.30 29.02 0.86 7 12.54 15.22 15.46 14.41 23.05
shown in Figure 3. The more most likely consist of addressing the weaknesses outlined inspread out each command is trained in the graphic, the more the previous section. 4 TABLE II TABLE III S OFTWARE T ESTS AND R ESULTS H ARDWARE T ESTS AND R ESULTS Test Name Test Description Test Result Test Name Test Description Test Result Navigational Checks the
studentsand faculty members. Similar resources are limited or even impossible to find or adopt.Thus, we have become motivated to invest our time and resources into developing a seriesof open sourced educational comics as virtual educational resources for teaching futureready thriving skills, such as emotional intelligence and ethical leadership.References Andreotti, V., Stein, S., Ahenakew, C., & Hunt, D. (2015). Mapping interpretations of decolonization in the context of higher education. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 4(1), 21-40. https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/des/article/view/22168/18470 Badenhorst, C., Moloney, C., & Rosales, J. (2020). New Literacies for Engineering Students
on groupprojects for which they are graded. Based on this small sampling, it appears students areexpected to know and use teamwork skills without much formal or sustained instruction.Textbooks: A quick survey of technical writing textbooks suggests that Technical Writinginstructors cover teamwork as a separate skill, taught in a class session or two and sometimessupported by a group project. Experience also suggests that few Engineering instructors devotesignificant time to discussion of teamwork. In 1997, Burnett’s Technical Communication, 4thed.’s chapter on teamwork provided helpful checklists but a single collaborative activity andassignments that were stand-alone vs integrated into course activities. [6] In 2010, Tebeaux and
petroleum engineering and industrial engineer may take these courses abroad. However, thecourses will not be approved for mechanical engineering students to take abroad. Facultymembers have been very supportive of accepting the international courses as electives and onedepartment is looking to revise the curriculum to create an ideal semester for the students to goabroad, should they choose to use the semester long exchange as their method of accomplishingthe international requirement. The WCOE will be working with the other engineeringdepartments and degree programs to rework their 4-year curriculum plan to identify the idealsemester(s) students should participate in a semester-long study abroad experience.6. Finding ways to make programs as cost
thinking skills during the activity, as well asgive feedback about the activity to provide insight on how to improve design activities in thefuture. As demonstrated by the results of the assessment described, design-based activitiesprovide students with the opportunity to develop and demonstrate their innovative thinkingskills.References1. Atkinson, R. and S. Andes. The Atlantic Century: Benchmarking EU and US Innovation Competitiveness. 2009 [cited 2013; Available from: http://www.itif.org/publications/atlantic-century-benchmarking-eu-and-us- innovation-and-competitiveness.2. Lechletier, J., America's Growing Innovation Gap, in Wall Street Journal. 2009, Dow Jones and Company: New York, NY.3. Pappas, E. Cognitive Processes Instruction in
of the faculty member’s role in the larger college organization inwhich s/he operates. Prepare Funding Proposals Build and Manage Grant/Project Teams Facilitate Meetings and Activities with Various Internal & External Team Members Perform Formal & Informal Leadership Roles and Responsibilities Prepare Various Communication Documents, Reports and Materials Maintain Positive Working Relationships with Internal and External Project/Grant Faculty, Staff, Administrators and Industry Partners Recruit Students, Faculty, Administrators, Staff Members, and External partners for Grant/Project Activities Perform Increasingly Complex Budget & Financial Management Responsibilities Develop a Positive Work
include a review of published technicalliterature. The MS projects described herein utilized local, state, and national design codes ormanuals. The partnership based projects provide students with more code experience and moreagency/client interactions than MS project from other sources.Figure 6. Maximum live load envelope along entire span of bridge. Maximum moment is 1253kip-ft at support 2, minimum moment is -1312 kip-ft at 231.65 ft.Finally, there is a learning outcome to provide the ability to provide solution(s) to a real-worldcivil engineering problem in one of the following four recognized major civil engineering areas:environmental and water resources engineering, geotechnical engineering, structural engineering,and transportation
] Hsinchun Chen, Mihail C. Roco, Jaebong Son, Shan Jiang, Catherine A. Larson, and Qiang Gao. Globalnanotechnology development from 1991 to 2012: patents, scientific publications, and effect of NSF funding. Journalof Nanoparticle Research, 15(9), September 2013.[5] S Wansom, TO Mason, and MC Hersam. A rubric for post-secondary degree programs in nanoscience andnanotechnology. International Journal, January 2009.[6] N Chopra and RG Reddy. Undergraduate Education in Nanotechnology and Nanoscience. JOM Journal of theMinerals, January 2012.[7] Roberto Cingolani. The road ahead. Nature Nanotechnology, 8(11):792–793, November 2013.[8] KS Martirosyan and D Litvinov. NanoScience Concentration Program for science, engineering and technologycurricula. (IEEE
professional expertise: Toward measurement of expert performance and design of optimal learning environments 412 (pp. 405–431). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 3. Velegol, S.B., Zappe, S. E., Mahoney, E. (2013) The Evolution of a Flipped Classroom: Evidence Based Recommendations. Advances in Engineering Education. Accepted. 4. Leicht, R., Zappe, S. E., Messner, J., & Litzinger, T. (2012). Employing the Classroom Flip to move “Lecture” out of the Classroom. Journal of Applications and Practices in Engineering Education. 3(1): 19-31. Page 24.953.10Appendix A: Focus Group QuestionsHello, I am_____ the facilitator for
Education. Engineering in K-12 education : understanding the status and improving the prospects. (National Academies Press, 2009).2. Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M. & Rogers, C. Advancing Engineering Education in P-12 Classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education 97, 369–387 (2008).3. Hester, K. & Cunningham, C. Engineering is elementary: An engineering and technology curriculum for children. in Proceedings of 2007 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition (2007).4. Bottoms, G. & Anthony, K. Project Lead the Way: A Pre-engineering Curriculum that Works. (Southern Regional Education Board, 2005).5. International Technology and Engineering Educators Association. Engineering byDesign. (2011). at 6. FIRST. USFIRST.org. Vision and
]. Douglas, J., Iversen, E., and Kalyandurg, C., “Engineering in the K-12 Classroom – An Analysis of Current Practice and Guidelines for the Future" http://www.asee.org/documents/conferences/k12/WorkshopDocuments/Engineering_in_t he_K-12_Classroom.pdf[2]. Ying Tang, Sachin Shetty, Kauser Jahan, John Henry, and S. Keith Hargrove, “Sustain City – A Cyberinfrastructure-Enabled Game System for Science and Engineering Design,” Journal of Computational Science Education, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2012, pp. 57-6[3]. Chris Franzwa, Ying Tang, Aaron Johnson, “Serious Game Design: Motivating Students through a Balance of Fun and Learning," Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Games
Paper ID #10147Student-led Mentoring Program Fostering Retention of Female Undergradu-ate Students in STEM FieldsDr. Raquel Perez-Castillejos, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. Raquel Perez-Castillejos is an assistant professor of Biomedical Engineering at the New Jersey Insti- tute of Technology (NJIT). Her research (www.tissuemodels.net) focuses on the development of tools for cell and tissue biology using micro- and nanotechnologies. Raquel obtained her Ph.D. with the National Center of Microelectronics in Barcelona. She was a postdoctoral fellow at the Laboratory of Miniaturized Systems (Univ. S˜ao Paulo, Brasil
Motorsports Program.” Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE IL/IN Section Conference, Indianapolis, IN, March 2007.2. Hylton, P. & Otoupal, W. (2014). “Engineers Can Interact in a Liberal Arts World.” Proceedings of the 2014 ASEE National Conference, Indianapolis, IN, June, 2014.3. Hylton, P, Raymond, S. & Otoupal, W. (2012). “Constructing a Collegiate Motorsports Engineering Program.” Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, October 2012, Seattle, WA.4. Lynch, D. & Russell, J. (2009). “Experiential Learning in Engineering Practice.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 135(1). Doi 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2009)135:1(31
and evidence to arrive at a conclusion. Any special circumstances encountered during the lab experiment should be discussed as relevant to the lab topic. V. Synthesis (20 pts): Demonstrate Synthesis of the lab topic by describing how the results of the lab experiment can be used to design a safe and productive workplace.VI. Lab Specific (10 pts): Provide raw data sheet(s) and specific analysis as required by lab experiment discussion.VII. Spelling, Grammar, Neatness (10 pts)3. Method: Using Feedback for ImprovementThere is no doubt that feedback is required for continuous improvement. Three different methodsof feedback are utilized for the enhancement of the course. Formative assessment through amidterm student
, T., Kirkpatrick, A. T. (2012). AC 2012-4832: ASME’S VISION 2030’S IMPORT FOR MECHANICAL. ASEE 2012 Conference Proceedings (p. 10). San Antonio: ASEE. 6. Dieter, G.E. and Schmidt L.C. (2012). Engineering Design, 5th ed., McGraw-Hill Book Co. 7. Hallgrimsson, B. (2012). A Model for Every Purpose: a Study on Traditional Versus Digital Model-Making Methods for Industrial Designers. Retrieved from www.idsa.org/sites/default/files/A%20Model%20for%20Every%20Purpose.pdf. 8. Evans, M. (2002).The Integration of Rapid Prototyping within Industrial Design Practice. PhD diss., Loughborough University. 9. Jones,T.S., Richey R.C. (2000).Rapid Prototyping Methodology in Action: a Developmental Study
Julian, and Chika Eke.Thanks to Dr. Joseph Hoffbeck, Dr. Ken Lulay, and Dr. Tammy VanDerGrift for thoughtfulinsights and discussion about this work.The survey methods described in this paper were reviewed and approved as exempt by the Univer-sity of Portland IRB committee.References1 W B Stouffer, Jeffrey S Russell, and Michael G Oliva. Making The Strange Familiar : Creativity and the Future of Engineering Education. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, number Torrance 1963, page Session #1615, 2004.2 Kazem Kazerounian and Stephany Foley. Barriers to Creativity in Engineering Education: A Study of Instructors and Students Perceptions. Journal of Mechanical Design, 129(7):761, July
. These linkages with business and industry enhance ouruniversity’s ability to provide an education that meets the needs of the job market, and aidsstudents in their pursuit of successful careers. During their first academic term, all TiPi scholarsare required to take an existing non-credit course in which they learn to prepare resumes, cover Page 24.1274.6letters, practice interviewing, and become familiar with the services of OCE to conduct the jobsearch for their first co-operative employment experience.A brochure on the TiPi Scholarship Program was designed and produced in-house describing theprogram, scholar selection process and criteria, S
tours of support facilities upon arrival.References [1] University Strategic Plan TBD reference will be provided after blind review. [2] Haas, C., McElholm, L., Renfro, S., Herkenham, E., Marshall, M., Alley, M. (2013). Engineering ambassador network: Establishment of successful ambassador engineering programs at four UTC Partner Schools. Proceedings of the 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, January 23 – 26, 2013, paper Page 24.1308.8 ID#7461. [3] Pike, G. and Kuh, G. (2005). A typology of student engagement for American colleges and universities. Research in Higher Education, 46, 185 – 209.[4
activities, inparticular, increased rigor of the course by promoting higher levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy.References cited:1. Felder, R.M. and Silverman, L.K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education [Electronic Version]. Engr. Education, 78(7), 674-681.2. Estes, A. C., Welch, R. W., and Ressler, S. J. (2005). The ExCEEd teaching model. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 131(4), 218-222.3. Felder, R. M., and Spurlin, J. (2005). Applications, Reliability and Validity of the Index of Learning Styles. Int. J. Engng Ed. Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 103-112, 2005.4. Campbell, M. (1999). “Oh, now I get it!” Proceedings of the 1999 American Society of Engineering Education Annual
draft papers from the instructor.References1. American Society of Civil Engineers, (2008). Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century,Preparing the Civil Engineer for the Future, Second Edition, ASCE Press, Reston, VA.2. Nelson, S. (2003). “Engineering and Technology Student Perceptions of Collaborative Writing Practices,” IEEETransactions on Professional Communications, Vol. 46, No. 4, 265-276.3. FitzPatrick, K. A. (2004). “An Investigative Laboratory Course in Human Physiology Using ComputerTechnology and Collaborative Writing,” Adv Physiol Educ, 28: 112-119.4. Gragson, D. E. and Hagen, J. P. (2010). “Developing Technical Writing Skills in the Physical ChemistryLaboratory: A Progressive Approach Employing Peer Review,” Journal