media can support the IT methods associated with goodm-learning such as high retention graphics, video and animation with voiceovers; and it does thisat the same time as it maintains the ubiquity of SMS-based text-only dissemination. That is,continuing education materials can be pushed out to the cell/smart phones of PEs’ registered forcourse(s) without their intervention (e.g., no browsing for information) regardless of the phonemodel, calling plan, or wireless service provider they own.In particular, this paper will discuss the following topics: 1. Existing models of university-company collaboration so as to introduce an atypical university-company collaboration in which the partnering company is a start-up which owns a
has contributed publications on women in engineering in collaboration with the College of Engineering at Pukyong National University. She is a postgraduate student at Universiti Sains Malaysia where she is pursuing her doctorate. Page 25.1036.7The Case in the USIn the 1950’s women represented less than 5% of the graduating classes in schools of law,medicine and engineering in the US. 8 During the intervening years, despite overt and covertdiscrimination, US women fought in both the courts and public opinion forums to be admittedinto schools of law and medicine (human and veterinary) without funding by the federalgovernment or professional
framework for the methods can be broadly applied to other programs.IntroductionFaculty members know that engineering employers place significant value on graduateprofessionalism. In the late 1990’s studies such as the Society of Manufacturing Engineers’“Industry Identifies Competency Gaps Among Newly Hired Engineering Graduates” 2 begancalling for increased communication and teamwork skills in engineering graduates. RecentlyNorman L. Fortenberry, Executive Director of ASEE, argued in an article in MechanicalEngineering, The Magazine of ASME, that “To operate effectively, next-generation engineerswill require a panoply of interpersonal and management skills, in addition to technicalproficiency.” He notes that the 2003 National Academy of Engineering
not. In order to determine which department wasrepresented, it was necessary to search the ETD database by the given department name (such asEDAC), determine the department(s) from which the faculty advisory committee members came,and make a departmental assignment for the ETD.Although students should be allowed to enter a free text term describing their degree, they shouldalso be required to choose a department and college from a controlled vocabulary list. Perhapsdrop down lists could be used, forcing students to choose the college and department that issuethe degree. Page 5.253.16By standardizing the department and college names, it
obligated to ensure basic scientific progress and should invest in the graduateresearch-oriented education of its future scientists. And the fourth theme was that the most effective way to advancescience and technology was to award research funds to the most capable universities in the nation, which weretherefore the “generators” of the nation’s future technology and its future scientists.2.2 Science Policy and Graduate Education for ResearchAccordingly, graduate research education, funding, research faculty, and curricula to enrich the graduate scientificresearch path were largely built into the nation’s engineering schools in the 1960’s, 70’s, and 80’s. Consequently,American engineering education has primarily followed the research-driven model
. 1010–1022, Springer, 2023. [2] M. Cook, Z. Lischer-Katz, N. Hall, J. Hardesty, J. Johnson, R. McDonald, and T. Carlisle, “Challenges and strategies for educational virtual reality: Results of an expert-led forum on 3d/vr technologies across academic institutions,” Information Technology and Libraries, vol. 38, p. 25–48, Dec. 2019. [3] S. Marshall, “Augmented reality’s application in education and training,” in Springer Handbook of Augmented Reality (A. Y. C. Nee and S. K. Ong, eds.), ch. 13, pp. 335–353, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023. [4] M. Safi and J. Chung, “Augmented reality uses and applications in aerospace and aviation,” in Springer Hand- book of Augmented Reality (A. Y. C. Nee and S. K. Ong, eds
able to: • Apply the design thinking process to identify a specific problem and develop a creative and/or innovative solution to address this problem. (Design Thinking) • Function effectively on a team. (Teamwork) • Demonstrate a knowledge of the country(ies) and culture(s) of their team members. (Global Competency)Students worked in one of three different types of teams: • IVE teams included two students from a US institution (either Bucknell or Clemson) and two from An-Najah. • US non-IVE teams included four students from Clemson University. • Palestinian non-IVE teams included four to five students from An-Najah.The reasoning for having these three different types of teams included that (a) there
defined by a sponsor or identified by the investigatorsthemselves. Overall, 37% of the participants belonged to the CD category, and 63% to the UIcategory.Participants presented a range of experiences in training doctoral students (see Fig. 1), rangingfrom 2 years to over 40 years. A majority of them fell within the category of 10-20 years ofmentoring experience (53%), followed by 35% with less than 10 years of experience.Additionally, 12% of participants possessed over 20 years of experience. This diversedistribution depicts a long-established doctoral training environment in the institution.4.2. Primary role(s) and responsibility of the faculty membersParticipants were asked to identify their primary role(s) in the doctoral training of students
-institutional collaboration space cannaturally become a live classroom where involved graduate and undergraduate students—thenext generation of engineers and engineering researchers—witness the ethical and professionalstandards in practice and accept and emulate them as the norm in the profession.AcknowledgmentThis study is supported by the U.S. Office of Naval Research under award number Grant #N00014-23-1-2260. References[1] L. Fleming, S. Mingo, and D. Chen, “Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success,” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 443–475, Sep. 2007, doi: 10.2189/asqu.52.3.443.[2] J. L. Hess, J. Ströbel, and A. O. Brightman, “The development
entrepreneurship.However, no organization or program aims to integrate entrepreneurship and STEAM withsustainability simultaneously. For instance, KEEN (The Kern Entrepreneurial EngineeringNetwork) partners with more than 50 colleges and universities across the United States. KEENfocuses on teaching undergraduate students the entrepreneurial mindset (EM) so they can createpersonal, economic, and social value through a lifetime of meaningful work.Also, in sustainability and specifically in the AEC industry, there are many governmentprograms and non-profit organizations at the local, national, and global levels, such as U.S.Green Building Council, Engineers Without Borders (Designing Sustainable Solutions), andWorld Green Council.Moreover, since the early 1990’s
Operating an Innovation Cebter to Nuture Future Engineering Innovators," in 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2024.[2] "Quick statistics 2022,"The University of Hong Kong, https://www.cpao.hku.hk/qstats/files/Archive/2022.pdf.[3] C. Keller, J. F. Prosise and P. J. Parker, "A Learner- and Equity-Centered Approach to Maker Spaces,," in Proceedings of the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2022.[4] D. M. Riley, L. D. McNair and A. S. Masters, "An Ethnography of Maker and Hacker Spaces Achieving Diverse Participation," in the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH, 2017.[5] G. Richard and S. Giri, "Inclusive collaborative learning with
can be pushed out to the cell/smart phones of PEs’ registered forcourse(s) without their intervention (e.g., no browsing for information) regardless of the phonemodel, calling plan, or wireless service provider they own.In particular, this paper will discuss the following topics: 1. Existing models of university-company collaboration so as to introduce an atypical university-company collaboration in which the partnering company is a start-up which owns a potentially potent m-outreach technology. 2. Definitions of m-learning in order to better understand the unique educational potential for engineers of the m-outreach tool upon which this university-company collaboration rests. 3. Details of the technology behind the
AC 2011-1064: TOWARDS MORE EFFECTIVE TEACHING STRATEGIESOF ITERATION AND SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT IN SPACECRAFT DE-SIGNHadi Ali, Purdue University Hadi Ali is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He holds a B.S. in Aeronautics and Astronautics from Purdue University and a B.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Jordan. He earned his Masters degree in Aeronautics and Astronautics from Purdue University majoring in aerospace systems design. He is also pursuing a Masters degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue. Hadi is a student member of AIAA, IEEE, ASME, and SAE.Robin Adams, Purdue University, West Lafayette Robin S. Adams is an Assistant Professor in
. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.5 Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: AAUW press.6 Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122.7 Lord, S. M., Brawner, C. E., Camacho, M. M., Layton, R. A., Ohland, M. W., & Wasburn, M. H., (2009). Work in
. Haller, C. R.; Gallagher, V. J.; Weldon, T. L.; Felder, R. M., Dynamics of peer education in cooperativelearning workgroups. Journal of Engineering Education 2000, 89, 285-293.6. Demetry, C.; Groccia, J. E., A comparative assessment of students' experiences in two instructional formatsof an introductory materials science course. Journal of Engineering Education 1997, 86, 203-210.7. Terenzini, P. T.; Cabrera, A. F.; Colbeck, C. L.; Parente, J. M.; Bjorklund, S. A., Collaborative learning vs.Lecture/discussion: Students' reported learning gains. Journal of Engineering Education 2001, 90, 123-130.8. Woods, D. R.; Hrymak, A. N.; Marshall, R. R.; Wood, P. E.; Crowe, C. M.; Hoffman, T. W.; Wright, J. D.;Taylor, P. A.; Woodhouse, K
.) What kind of bridge is this? Le ally What is / are the purposes(s) or function (s) of this bridge? What is the bridge
strategy, oneteam didn’t do so effectively (Team E2), and the other (Team M2) did, obtaining the highestscore overall in the competition. Analyzing Team M2’s approach in more detail may providesome insight as to the nature of effective mathematics use in design solutions for these robotcompetitions. Page 22.1246.9 Table 2: Features of the Focus Teams Students Coaches/Mentors First Move
Faculty Emailed6. Have you increased or added the use of any of the six recommendations? If Yes,please indicate which one(s).Share an encouraging or Share an encouraging orinformative message with informative message withstudents 6 86% students 2 100%Take a minute to give Take a minute to giveconstructive feedback 4 57% constructive feedback 0 0%Show that you are Show that you areapproachable 4 57% approachable 1 50%Encourage students to meet Encourage students to meetwith you during office hours 6 86% with you during office hours
United States. The Bridge, 39(3), 5-10.2. Goodland, S. (1997). Responding to perceived training needs for graduate teaching assistants. Studies in Higher Education, 22(1), 83-92.3. Salinas, M.F., Kozuh, G., & Seraphine, A. (1999). I think I can: Improving teaching self-confidence of international teaching assistants. Journal of Graduate Teaching Assistant Development, 6(3), 149-156.4. Fink, L.D. & Ambrose, S. (2005). Becoming a professional engineering educator: A new role for a new era. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 185-194.5. Shulman, L. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching; A contemporary perspective. In M. C. Witrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Teaching, 3rd ed
address 0X30D 15. ------------- 16. Read transmission data from RX FIFO at long address 0X311 17. The data read continues depends on its desired length 18. ------------- The very last action on the receiving side is to do a read on the INTSTAT register (shortaddress at 0X31) to clear the INT flag(s) and it will automatically stop the INT action from themodule to the MCU. The actual set up of the hardware of the master control unit is shown in photo 1: Amicrocontroller trainer configured as a master (a PIC16F877A MCU) control unit in associationwith a MRF24J40MA transceiver module, power supply and miscellaneous passive componentsare assembled and configured on the PIC trainer. You will note that MRF24J40MA module isplugged
were made in Indonesia, and a screen designed in Korea). It made me realize how interconnected everything is now. One of my favorite books is called “The World is Flat,” and it was at that moment that the world truly felt flat and so small. No accomplishment, advancement, product, or anything can be claimed by a single country now. Everything humanity does now is a global effort in every sense.The CURE students appreciated the universally positive work relationships that they shared withtheir PKU graduate student mentors but did not develop social relationships with them thatextended outside of the lab or their shared work. The mentors made the effort to make theirCURE colleague(s) comfortable in the labs by sharing
and prototyping. Students taking thiscourse were interested in graduate-level knowledge on the genesis, mathematics, and empiricalbasis for contemporary methods. The obvious need existed, however, to provide diverseexercises to apply the techniques, without detracting from the time needed to achieve asuccessful product. Reverse engineering showed great potential to address this need. Finally, the USAFA courses have a similar historical background and set of needs.During the early 1990’s, the USAFA design course (a sophomore-level introduction toengineering design) emphasized contemporary design methods following the mechanical designprocess described by Ullman [42]. While the general course material, including a designcompetition, and
data collected in the second phase of the study will be extremely instrumental in further Page 15.79.14understanding faculty beliefs about entrepreneurship education and how these translate intoteaching practices.AcknowledgementThe authors would like to acknowledge grant support from NSF-EEC #0835992,“Entrepreneurship Education and Its Impact on Engineering Student Outcomes: The Role ofProgram Characteristics and Faculty Beliefs.”Bibliography:1. Katz, J. A. 2003. The chronology and intellectual trajectory of American entrepreneurship education 1876- 1999. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2): 283-300.2. Ohland, M. W., Frillman, S. A
new projects, simply because they cannot pronounce your name; it keeps us from getting the recognition we deserve. (Gonzalez & Musielak, 2002)The article goes on to report: Hispanic women also are underrepresented in higher education. Of the 39,400 women employed as S&E faculty and researchers at universities in 1997, only 1,300 were Hispanic – accounting for just 3.3 percent of all female professors and less than 1 percent of the S&E faculty in the nation. (Gonzalez & Musielak, 2002)Dr. Evelyn Hammonds, a pioneer in issues related to minority women on science andengineering and a professor at Harvard University is quoted as saying that she “was surprisedthat even in 2002, these women (faculty
Project ResultsThe overall quality of the students‟ design projects was more than satisfactory. Students showedsignificant innovation and built a wide variety of designs, ranging from parabolic dishes, aconverted projection television utilizing the television‟s large Fresnel lens, a parabolic troughcomplete with rotisserie, and several simpler ovens built from various materials, includingcardboard boxes, mini-refrigerators, streetlights, toolboxes, and various other scavenged items.A wide variety of insulation materials were utilized, including shredded newspaper, carpeting,plastic bottles, Styrofoam, commercial spray foams, commercial fiberglass insulation, andscavenged clothes and blankets. In addition to the basic egg, many students made more