) • Connectivity Problems (17 Voices) • Challenges and Obstacles of Virtuality (15 Voices) • Difficulties with Specific Content (9 Voices) • Personal Factors (6 Voices)Student statements about obstacles to learning during the course reflect an uneven adaptation tovirtual teaching. Challenges are associated with connectivity and understanding specific topics such asmathematics and circuit laws.3) What changes to the course could improve your learning? When analyzing the answers to thisquestion, the following emerging constructs can be seen (71 student voices) • Suggestions to Improve interaction (43 voices) • Request for More Practices and Activities (37 Voices) • Recommendations to Improve Communication (20 Voices)Below is a
questionnaire refers to emotions you may experience as part of this class (EGR 210 - Electric Circuits). It is divided into three sections: (a) your emotions related specifically to testing in this course, (b) your emotions related to Circuits class in general, and (c) your experience as part of the larger Engineering program. Please reflect on your experiences during this semester as you answer the questions below.* Required Unique Identifier 1. Copy and paste the unique identifier you received in your email: *Emotions during Electric Circuits testing and examsAttending college classes can create different feelings. This part of the questionnaire refers specifically to emotionsyou may experience during exams in EGR 210 - Electric Circuits. Before
limitation is mostlikely due to the FPGA’s ability to connect two ALMs during the routing process, where a wirewith a width larger than 1120 cannot be connected between two ALMs. The data we report onlygoes up to a maximum bit-width of 1024, so this limitation is not reflected in our graphs. Also,the Goldschmidt divider has a smaller range than the other dividers because it was not able tosynthesize above a width of 244. This is due to the limited number of DSP blocks.4.1 AreaThe FPGA used in these tests is the 5CGXFC9E7F35C8 from the Cyclone V line. This FPGA ischosen due to its large amount of available ALMs and DSP blocks. The maximum ALMs that ourFPGA has in this study is 113,560. Very few dividers in this study approached this maximumnumber of
standard deviation and the number of participants for each semester. The Likert-scale used in the surveyconcepts across various ranged from "Excellent" (5) to "Poor" (1), enabling participants to rateinstructional delivery formats. The their perceptions regarding the effectiveness of the take-home kits ormodules' effectiveness is widely desk-scale modules in aiding their understanding of theoretical concepts underlying physicochemical phenomena and unit operations.acknowledged among students,reflected in small standarddeviations. Emphasizing the importance of face-to-face components in blended learning, thesemodules received high
to improve student teamwork experience and academic performance in circuits analysis course Proceedings of the 129th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition, 2022 https://peer.asee.org/40873[34] *S. Claussen, V. Dave. “Reflection and metacognition in an introductory circuits course,” Proceedings of the 124th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, 2017. https://peer.asee.org/28788[35] *B. H. Ferri, D. M. Majerich, N. V. Parrish, A. A. Ferri. “Use of a MOOC platform to blend a linear circuits course for non-majors,” Proceedings of the 121st American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and
results from the preceding analysis,including further interpretation of the results, and propose some possible explanations.Beginning with demographic variables, Asian students reported stronger beliefs in the value ofcollaborative learning compared to white students. This may reflect cultural differences inlearning styles, or the value placed on group harmony and collective effort. Additionally,Mechanical Engineering (ME) and Industrial Engineering (IE) students showed lowercollaborative learning beliefs compared to their counterparts in Electrical and ComputerEngineering (ECE). These findings suggest that there may be disciplinary differences in thevalue and integration of collaborative learning in different degree programs.Turning to other
gender choice of “Other”was excluded due to the limited number of degrees awarded, reported only for 2019. Our“Native” category reflects combining the racial reporting options of “American Indian/AlaskaNative” and “Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander.” Similarly, our “Multi” category reflectscombining “Foreign,” “Multiracial,” and “Unknown.” Other racial categories are used asreported by ASEE (e.g., “Asian,” “Black,” “Hispanic,” and “White”). Procedurally, the data was first downloaded into a CSV file. A self-generated Jupyter filewas created to clean the data and create the tidy format [21] XLSX files needed by Tableau forcreating the infographics [11]. Once the charts were styled with shapes, colors, and categorieschosen for visual
-learning systems [21]. To assess students’learning styles, this study used the Visual, Aural, Read/Write, or Kinesthetic (VARK) learningstyles inventory which is a questionnaire consists of 16 items used to assess the respondent’slearning style [21]. The study also used the Dixion scale to measure students’ engagement usingthe adaptive or non-adaptive e-learning system; this scale includes the factors of skills,participation/interaction, performance, and emotion [21]. This study found that students wholearned through the adaptive system learned more, reflected by their engagement scale responsesand overall course outcomes. While this study does not model the relationship between students’learning styles and intentions to use, has a small sample
incorporated into the class to help students toaddress these questions. The lab experimentation provided students with a hands-on opportunity to assess the biological impact of various biomaterials. Through thisexperiment, students gained practical skills in experimental design, data analysis,and interpretation, fostering a deeper understanding of biomaterials beyondtheoretical concepts. The inclusion of ethical considerations in the biomaterialcurriculum was addressed through a debate. This encouraged students to reflect onthe societal implications of biomaterials research, fostering a sense of responsibilityand ethical awareness among future practitioners.The study employed both qualitative and quantitative assessment methods,including pre- and post
self-advocacy processes. A brief reflective assignment that asks allstudents to consider personal assets and challenges that they are facing in their collegiatejourneys might be beneficial. The FYED course already introduces students to social styles, andthis information is often used in teaming. The instructional team could consider whether thisexercise could be modified to introduce other diversity characteristics and specifically addressneurodivergence and potentially mental health issues. The faculty development series forinstructors could also introduce topics related to ND and encourage faculty to integrate UDLprinciples.AppendixSurvey items to measure teamwork experiences during the semester (response options): Rate your experience on
disciplines.This collaborative approach reflects the team's dedication to merging diverse skill sets for thesuccessful realization of their electric vehicle project. As students mentioned, “Our team iscomposed of students from various departments across HKU, each contributing their expertise tothe project. We have ME students dedicated to the mechanical design of our race car, EEstudents focused on the electrical aspects, and CS and EE students working on the controlsystem. Additionally, our team also includes Medical and Engineering students who form ourSim Racing Team, while Art, Science, and Business students handle sponsorship and publicrelation matters.”Recognizing the fact that fabricating a fully functional racing car is beyond the scope and
specific skills and experiences that can inspire them andopen doors to various career paths. In engineering programs, research is an excellent way ofproviding project-based learning opportunities to students while working toward meaningfulgoals that have the potential to change society for the better.In this paper, we describe the efforts of a team of undergraduate mechanical engineering studentsin creating and demonstrating an experimental silicone venous valve model and flow controlsystem for use in future scientific research aimed at ultimately reducing the impact of awidespread but often unseen disease. We describe the experimental test systems and reflect onstudent learning from this project. In order to understand on a basic level the need
cases are any indication, capitalism serves as a breeding ground for those who aspireto great wealth. “Greed is good” preaches a ruthless Gordon Gecko in the 1987 film Wall Street[71], reflecting a world view of exploitation, cheating—whatever it takes to make heaps ofmoney and feed an individual’s self-interest. Harris and Blanck certainly, and with no apparentmoral qualms, engaged in worker exploitation, as did U.S. Steel. Our own times are marked bythe emergence of the “uber-rich,” such as Elon Musk (net worth: $264 billion) and Jeff Bezos(net worth: $152 billion) [72]. While some, such as Warren Buffet and Bill Gates, liberallycontribute to social causes, others simply take the money and run.While greed is surely associated with capitalism
voluntarily participate in the external assessment, the ethical researchprinciple of Justice was upheld. US and foreign nationals, men, and women, and participation ofvarious racial and religious traditions, illustrate the inclusive nature of the study. Thus, all hadbenefited from the SME assessment. Moreover, since the certification exams were always heldon campus at the study institution the concept of convenience was secured.2.3.7 Data management plan. From the collected data, we performed a survey for those studentswho participated in the professional society exam (external assessment). This survey was briefbut related to the two of the three categories we have devised, namely, BOK and assessmentdelivery. For the BOK category, the reflection
explicitly emphasized in any of the approaches discussed above, yet it hasbeen argued they remain essential for fostering a successful semiconductor manufacturingenvironment [23]. How the approaches are embedded in the respective cultures, be it learningculture or a general one, for example, is an important element to examine whether thesemiconductor workforce preparation could succeed or not.Finally, this study should prompt a more in-depth reflection on the definition of the “talentshortage” in the semiconductor industry, and how HEIs policy follows and responds. Do theprograms discussed above solely seek to train high-level engineers, or does it encompass abroader spectrum, such as engineering technicians? If the latter is the case, how can we
, platform, software or any or all of them. In more detail:IaaS: Cloud Infrastructure as a Service (sometimes called Hardware as a Service). This is where the computing is done in real or more often virtual machines; if the latter they use a hypervisor (Xen, KVM) under a coordinating system. You could have images in a virtual machine image library, raw (block) and file-based storage, firewalls, load balancers, IP addresses, virtual local area nets and software bundles. Cloud providers typically bill IaaS services on a utility computing basis, that is, cost will reflect the amount of resources allocated and consumed.SaaS: Software as a Service. Seldom including tenancy (such as VMs). SaaS includes the use
if you tell us! We value your input, and want to find out your opinions regarding the library, its resources, and the services we provide. You should be able to complete this survey in 5-10 minutes. You do not need to reveal your identity. Please answer each question by marking in the box next to the choice which you feel best reflects your opinion. Feel free to add any additional comments or observations in the space provided. General Information 1. Are you? KSU Faculty/Staff KSU Student Reciprocal borrower (SAVTS, KWU, etc.) Community user 2. How often do you visit the KSU-Salina Library? 3 to 4 times a week or more
reflections on trip and final*Set course expectations (coordinated *Facilitate students’ hands on activity projectswith ES and MS school curriculum), communication to *Oversee, coordinate finalinclude scientific research on a chosen grade school/middle video conference withtopic, interactions with elementary school partners partners’ PP presentationsschool aged students, other course *Provide expertise for to share what was learnedrequirements all participants as *Post-trip visit to grade*Provide model for deliverables needed school/middle school(activities, games, computersimulations
a get out clause, then they'll use it, right? So they say, oh, no, [we have] nothing to do with those [graduate students]. That's those guys. Then I say, yeah, that is true. And… then you can't use faculty resources, right? Because… we don't have a lot of resources anyway.” (Professor 9, Donnybrook)This sentiment is reflected in other studies that note it is often unclear what departments areresponsible for specific aspects of graduate student services within universities [16, 17].Recommendations and ConclusionsThere were a number of recommendations that arose from the opinions offered by faculty andstudents during their interviews. In terms of addressing the admission processes, while fourprofessors mentioned that they
adjustment. Broadly speaking, students’ college success depends on two factors, i.e., students’background and their preparation at entry level, and university factors. Different types of university programstend to in take students who are different at the beginning level. The successes of the university programs maynot necessary reflect the differential impact of these programs, but simply the differences in the characteristicsof the entering students in these different programs. Therefore, if a study is to exam the success of a universityprogram, then students’ entry factors need to be partialed out as covariates. Typical examples applied covariateadjustment are given in Astin and Astin (1992); French, et. al., (2005).Longitudinal data analysis
prepare them forreal-world industry experience, or perhaps for engineering Capstone programs. Indeed, recentresearch makes this argument, that college engineering Capstone programs would be even moresuccessful if students were exposed to project-based learning earlier in their schooling.18Despite the ambiguity that often occurs in open-ended, project-based assignments, we learnedfrom students and our reflections that instructors should do the following to minimizeambiguities: • Provide a clear time-line of expected deliverables and due dates. • Provide grading criteria up front. • Make available numerous examples of each deliverable. • And provide regular, substantive feedback throughout the process
participated in, werecompared between engineers and non-engineers in an effort to investigate whether engineeringand non-engineering students show differential rates of participation in Tech to Teaching. Thiscount of semesters in which students participated reflects a count of any semesters in which theyparticipated in one or more Tech to Teaching activities. The activity count is a count of the totalnumber of distinct Tech to Teaching activities in which they participated. Page 22.32.21 Figure 10. Count of semesters in which students participated – all Tech to Teaching students
useexperimental data to validate or rejecttheir hypotheses. In the assignment as Figure 1: Raw (R) and hardboiled (B) eggs after 24well, higher-level questions that hours of incubation in water (1), syrup (2) and energyelevate the critical thinking skills of drink (3).the students were given. For example,students were asked to explain why boiled and raw eggs behaved differently in transportingsolutions (Figure 1)? Answers should have reflected on the concepts of permeability and proteindenaturation at elevated temperatures. In their assignment too, students were asked to quantifythe diffusion across the cellular membrane as well as the ionic strength concentration of the innerenvironment of the egg using Fick’s law. Based on their
challenge the status quo.Primary Traits: A passing submission for this criterion must: 1. Describe the situation or current mode of operation (status quo) and perceived constraints. 2. Present one or more questions that challenge the status quo. 3. Explain how each question is a challenge to the status quo.Potential Artifacts: reflective essay, blog, journal, presentationAdditional Information: 1. Common approaches to this type of questioning include asking “Why?”, “Why not?”, and “What if?” For example, “Why is program accreditation done every six years?” 2. It can be helpful to imagine an opposing situation or viewpoint. For example, “What if program accreditation was done by employers rather than agencies
), with little effort required, is developedthrough practice. The Instructional Implications section of this paper presents ideas on how thisknowledge can be developed for thermodynamics.Conditional Knowledge Conditional knowledge refers to students’ knowledge of the situations in which particulardeclarative or procedural knowledge should be applied.4,31 This knowledge reflects the students’awareness of when, where, and why other knowledge should be used, and this awarenessunderlies cognitive control during problem solving. That is, a student who knows the conditionsunder which some other particular knowledge should be used is positioned to recognize thoseconditions when they are encountered and, consequently, select the appropriate
speak out about science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32 (1), 3-27.[8] American Association of University Women Educational Foundation. (2000). Tech-Savvy: Educating girls in Page 15.735.15 the new computer age. Washington, DC: Author.[9] American Association of University Women Educational Foundation. (2004). Under the Microscope: A decade of gender equity projects in the sciences. Washington, DC: Author.[10] Resnick, M. & Silverman, B. (2005). Some reflections on designing construction kits for kids. Proceedings of Interaction Design and Children conference, Boulder, CO.[11