Institute and State University Dr. Ben Chambers is an Assistant Collegiate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, and Director of the Frith First Year Makers program. His research focuses include the interactions of non-humans with the built environment, the built environment as a tool for teaching at the nexus of biology and engineering, and creativity-based pedagogy. He earned his graduate degrees from Virginia Tech, including an M.S. Civil Infrastructure Engineering, M.S. LFS Entomology, and a Ph.D. in Environmental Design and Planning.Matthew James P.E., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Matthew James is an Associate Professor of Practice in Engineering Education at
third category “On adrive team that was one of many drive teams,” the participant pool available to survey remainslimited and has not progressed beyond collegiate achievements, because the practice of multipledrive teams is relatively new (seven years).Understanding the long term impact of organizing to support multiple drive teams on a singlecompetitive robotics team will inform how future teams may best be configured to provide thebest outcomes to participants.Acknowledgements:The authors would like to thank all FRC Teams who participated in the survey; Chief Delphi forproviding an avenue to post the survey; and FIRST NC for their excellent administration andcoordination of the District and State Events. The authors would also like to thank
experiences on diverse studentsˆa C™ atti- tudes, beliefs, and perceptions of engineering, aDr. Monica McGill, CSEdResearch.org Monica McGill is Founder and CEO of CSEdResearch.org. Her area of scholarship is computer science education research with a current focus on diversity and improving the quality of research to examine effective practices on a large scale. She oversaw the recent development of the robust K-12 CS Education Research Resource Center with manually curated data from over 1,000 article summaries and a list of over 180 instruments for evaluating STEM education.Jordan Williamson ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A Critical Examination of ASEE’s
andexploring topics, and electronic document sharing, to name a few. The devices that can beutilized for education also are shifting. Students and instructors have access to information andinstruction not only from a desktop or laptop computer, but also digital tablets, smart phones, anddedicated readers. However, the form of delivery is not as important as the design of theinstruction. Technology does not automatically improve instruction unless the instructiondelivered through the technology is designed to be better. A number of studies havedemonstrated that the technology alone does not improve students’ learning and has nosignificant impact on student achievement. Researchers insist that these studies are asking thewrong question8. They state
Arral Mariah Arral is a 4th year Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University. Her Ph.D. advisor is Dr. Kathryn Whitehead, and her thesis research focuses on lipid nanoparticle-mediated messenger RNA (mRNA) delivery. Mariah obtained her Bachelor’s degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of New Hampshire and did her Honors thesis with Dr. Jeffrey Halpern studying electrochemical biosensors. She has received multiple awards including the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (GRFP). Mariah is an openly disabled scientist and has a passion for creating equitable access to education for everyone. During her undergraduate studies, she developed an
which is a high-stake design-build-test whose themevaries from term to term. This paper describes three semesters of the course: Term 1 is Fall 2018, 1Term 2 is Spring 2019, and Term 3 is Fall 2019. The course currently underway is Spring 2020and referenced as Term 4.Students are tasked with a design-build-test of a mechanical device for the end-of-term“competition” to showcase their high-stake design project. This class employs a team of 20undergraduate teaching assistants (TAs) to help facilitate various aspects of the course and tostaff the laboratory around the clock during business hours. Two to three graduate TAs are alsoassigned to the course
at the university.Planned Next StepsContinuing to work with academic advisors across the college of engineering on approvingcommunity-engaged courses as technical electives and capstone design courses is important forimproving access to the HE program. Using the IDI as an assessment tool may help to provideinsight into the impacts of the program related to intercultural competency growth. Furtherqualitative assessment metrics are in development and planned for implementation.References[1] Jacoby, B. 2014. Service-Learning Essential: Questions, Answers and Lessons Learned,Edition 1. Jossey Bass Higher and Adult Education, A Wiley Brand.[2] Greene, H. L., & Eldridge, K., & Sours, P. J. (2019, June), Engagement in Practice
of Prof. Nick Holonyak, Jr. She worked as a member of technical staff at Lytel, Inc., following graduation. At Polaroid, she was appointed a Senior Research Group Leader, responsible for the design of laser diodes and arrays. After leaving Polaroid, she was employed at Biocontrol Technology. She moved into academia full-time in 1997 and worked at the University of Denver, West Virginia University, and Virginia Tech. She is currently the director of the University of Glasgow-University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Electronics and Electrical Engineering programme. While at Virginia Tech, she collaborated with Dr. Robert W. Hen- dricks, with assistance of a number of undergraduate students, to
globalengineers requires a shift in paradigm in their formation.In 2006, Continental Corporation funded the first scientific global engineering study conductedby eight prestigious universities around the world2. The study resulted in four recommendations: (1) A key qualification of engineering graduates must be global competence; (2) Transnational mobility for engineering students, researchers, and professionals needs to become a priority; Page 14.296.2 (3) Global engineering excellence critically depends on a partnerships, especially those that link engineering education to professional practice; and (4) Research is urgently needed
Paper ID #37445Evaluating a High School Engineering Community of Practice: ThePerspective of University Liaisons (Evaluation)Dr. Sabina Anne Schill, Florida International University Dr. Sabina Schill is a postdoctoral scholar at Florida International University working with Dr. Bruk Berhane on Engineering For US All (e4usa), a high school curriculum that aims to democratize engineer- ing. Sabina received her BS in Physics from Westminster College in Salt Lake City, UT, and her PhD in Environmental Engineering from the University of Colorado Boulder. Sabina has research interests in the areas of K-12 engineering education
granting institution (180undergraduate and graduate degree programs) located in south Florida and is designated as a“High Research Activity” university by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement forTeaching. FAU serves over 30,000 undergraduate and graduate students and ranks as the mostracially, ethnically diverse institution in Florida. The College of Engineering and ComputerScience and the Department of Computer & Electrical Engineering and Computer Science(CEECS) are located on the main campus. All the undergraduate degree programs in theCollege are accredited by the Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET).The College offers a flexible schedule of courses delivered through a variety of formats (e.g.,e-learning
-traditional students, adeeper examination of this group within graduate education research becomes critical, especiallyconsidering that only a few studies concentrate on their motivations and experiences. The resultsof these examinations can support graduate programs to make further changes to the design anddelivery of their doctoral curriculums by accounting for the unheard voices of these non-traditional students and raising awareness of their lived experiences throughout their program. In this paper, we describe the preliminary results of a collaborative autoethnographicexploration of the professional and educational experiences of two professional non-traditionaldoctoral students in engineering and computing education. We define
Paper ID #37614Summer Bridge Programming for Incoming First-YearStudents at Three Public Urban Research UniversitiesMiriam Howland Cummings (Graduate Research Assistant) Miriam is a PhD candidate in Education Research and Evaluation Methods at the University of Colorado Denver (CU Denver) and a graduate research assistant on an NSF S-STEM grant in CU Denver's College of Engineering, Design, and Computing.Maryam Darbeheshti (Faculty) Dr. Maryam Darbeheshti is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Colorado Denver. Her research interests are in multiphase fluid flow, and Engineering
order to retain more women within this field, a better understandingis needed of the female experience during the engineering design team process.Recognizing this need, the National Science Foundation's Activities for Women and Girls inScience, Engineering & Mathematics program has sponsored the Engineering Design Teams:Influence of Gender Composition on the Decision-Making Process project (EHR-9979444) at theColorado School of Mines (CSM). This project seeks to better understand the interactions thattake place between men and women during the team decision making process in the DesignEngineering Practices Introductory Course Sequence (EPICS). Design EPICS is a sequence ofrequired first and second year courses at CSM in engineering design
Management program as well as the Graduate Coordinator for the Master of Science in Technology Management - Professional Science Master’s (PSM) concentration in Construction Science and Management. With over 30 years of teaching and industry experience, Prof. Shofoluwe’s areas of teaching and research expertise include sustainable construction practices, construction project management, construction contracts administra- tion, construction safety and risk management. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in Industrial Technology (Building Construction) from NCA&T State University, a Master’s degree in Technology (Construction Management) from Pittsburg State University, and a Doctorate of Industrial Technology (Construction
problems, understanding of the design process, multidisciplinary thinking, teamcollaboration, communication and appreciation of the impact of engineering on our society.Students met once a week for fifty minutes and from the start students were assigned in teams offour. The class was designed around three modules (Design Process, Team Collaborations,Communications) and two major team projects. The design process module covered traditionalmaterial such as need statement, project scope, design requirements, design concept generationand evaluation, baseline design, milestones and schedule but also introduced students to theconcepts of human centered design. Students had the opportunity to practice these skills on twomajor projects. For team
for oneblock or neighborhood is not directly replicable at another. Sustainable housing is tied with manyother wicked problems such as issues of poverty, equitable education, resource conservation, andclimate change. As a result, any response to this wicked problem will impact the others. Withinthe participating WPSI courses, student teams were tasked to develop viable responses to thiswicked problem through staged design reviews, while being exposed to its overall complexityand interconnectedness of sustainable housing with other wicked problems.Our MotivationWPSI is organized through Engineers for a Sustainable World (ESW). As an organization, ourvision is for a world of environmental, social, and economic prosperity created and sustained
we focus on in this study is skills required for an engineering student to be innovative,what we call innovative design. We describe innovative design as the act of generating novelconcepts, processes, or designs. Innovative design is closely linked to creativity,6 using andimplementing creative ideas to develop something tangible, real, or meaningful in a societalcontext. This type of innovation may be described as incremental, leading to small changes, orradical, leading to a complete rethinking of existing practices and designs, or generating entirelynew concepts altogether.7Innovative design may be broken up into constituent components by identifying what skills ortraits are necessary for being innovative. For example, Eris (2004
professoriate, the disciplineremains primarily White (64.7%), with only 2.5% of engineering faculty identifying as Black(American Society for Engineering Education [ASEE], 2022). An intrinsic case study design(Stake, 1995) explores the keys to successful cross-race mentoring of mentees and mentorsinvolved in the Increasing Minority Presence within Academia through Continuous Training(IMPACT) mentoring program. The research question guiding this study is: What do IMPACTmentoring program mentors and mentees believe are the keys to successful cross-race mentoringin engineering academia? This study is sponsored by a National Science Foundation BroadeningParticipation in Engineering Track 3 award.The IMPACT Mentoring ProgramThe IMPACT mentoring program was
, STEM education, and ABET accreditation.Dr. Steve U. Efe, Morgan State University Dr. Steve Efe is an Assistant Professor and the Assistant Director of the Center for Advanced Transporta- tion and Infrastructure Engineering Research. He obtained his Doctor of Engineering in Civil Engineering with a major in Structural Engineering and minor in Construction from Morgan State University. He has more than 15 years of outstanding experience in practicing, teaching, and research in civil and transporta- tion engineering. He is experienced in project management, inspection and construction supervision, adaptive materials and construction techniques, high performance material testing and simulations, mate- rial modeling and
), broad education (EMPi), and contemporary civil engineering issues(EMPj), 3) student preparation for completing code compliant designs (PREP), and 4) studentconfidence to conduct engineering design (CNF). Note, the lower-case letters associated theitem categories represent the respective criteria 3 ABET learning outcomes.Table 1. Post course/project survey Item Statement/Question Rate your degree of (Task-Specific Self Concept) to perform the following tasks by recording a number from 0 to 100: 1 Conduct engineering design 2 Identify a design need 3 Research a design need 4 Develop design solutions 5 Select the best possible design 6 Construct a prototype 7 Evaluate and test a design 8
to analyze the interaction students hadwhile working in the team, to understand better their cognitive design process when faced withother lenses of expertise and developing best practices to design such challenges in the classroom.Future studies will aim to understand the interdisciplinary design process to understand theeffectiveness of student´s contribution as interdisciplinary work, and its connection to sustainabledesign traits. Furthermore, the researchers will aim to understand how to apply suchinterdisciplinary experiences into other experiences of the majors both within specific courses andbetween majors.References[1] E. J. Power y J. Handley, «A best-practice model for integrating interdisciplinarity into the higher education
Communities ofPractice (CoPs) to provide mutual support and training, and to encourage and facilitate theorganic dissemination of best practices across courses among the members of the community ofpractice. In particular, mentorship relationships within the community have provided readyavenues for the translation of best practices. In this paper, we describe and analyze the redesignof one such course in the WIDER community, highlighting how the redesign of this course wasinformed by its involvement within this larger community of practice.1. Introduction Since the 1980s the Computer Science (CS) department at The University of Illinois(UIUC) has offered a service course, “Introduction to Computing”, that was designed to servenon-CS and non
. Page 21.41.4ProjectsIn 1999 the Federal Austrian Ministry for Education and Culture published a report aboutprojects on Austrian VET schools and colleges, to “show the performance of the schools andcolleges to an interested public”20. 40 % of the 471 reviewed projects had partners from industry.Students had studied the disciplines building construction, chemistry, IT, electronic, electricalengineering, interior design, wood technology, food technology, manufacturing systemsengineering and others while doing their projects.In 2002 another review showed that in the teaching period 2001/2002 42 teaching institutionswith 1336 projects had been evaluated. 66 % of these projects had a practical impact, in 44 % ofthe project an external partner were
leadership andinitiative skills. This is illustrated in Figure 4. The larger standard deviation of 0.98 reflects morevariability in students’ perceptions of the impact of AI on these skills. Figure 4: Distribution of Responses to TE2This result is significant because it touches upon the teaching effectiveness factor of our survey.The neutral responses align with previous research suggesting that “technology supplementseducation” rather than drastically reshaping its core principles 10 . This supports the idea that whileAI is a valuable resource for automating tasks and providing support, the development of skillsinfluenced by teaching effectiveness, like leadership and initiative, still depend on the educatorthemselves. In
tocommission the development of a seminar to help prepare these new faculty for a heavy teachingload. The seminar was intended to meet the following criteria: 1) be of short duration, 2) bebased on methods supported by research, focusing on 'best practices in engineering education',and 3) be suitable for new faculty, graduate assistants and part-time faculty.The authors (holding both engineering and education degrees) received an internal grant andcollaborated with instructional designers from the university's E-learning center to develop andfacilitate the training. The purpose of this seminar is to promote the best practices, to guidefaculty and teaching assistants new to teaching in the engineering fields, to advance theirconfidence and satisfaction
website, and synchronous virtual professional development activities that canenable best practices for virtual communities of practices as described above. In particular, thefollowing research questions were posed: 1) who participates in virtual collaboration eventsaimed at facilitating collaborative learning of various BME education and professionaldevelopment topics?, and 2) what are the demographics of the participants of these events interms of title, role, and institution? Results of this study aim to elucidate whether a BME virtualcommunity of practice can break down the aforementioned professional silos through onlineasynchronous and synchronous knowledge transfer.Methods:The Biomedical Engineering Education Community (BEEC) [21] is a
, andproject development of the participants. This paper will also focus on the continued use of remote internshipsand experiential opportunities as a High Impact Practice to engage students at an urban commuter universityacross all majors.BackgroundHigh Impact Practices (HIPs) have been shown to be effective in retention, persistence, and overall studentsuccess [1-5]. These practices include activities such as undergraduate research, service learning, experientiallearning opportunities, internships, study abroad, collaborative projects and writing intensive courses. Theseactivities have been found to be very beneficial for underrepresented students. Institutional resources,curriculums and student body demographics limit the effectiveness of the
interface design, many of which are visual concepts. In order to adapt the curriculum, weused a high-resolution tactile display capable of mirroring imagery from a video display into adepth map that could be felt. This enabled the dual presentation of visual content as tactilesurface maps. Through this process, we learned several best practices in terms of how to createcontent that transfers well from one modality to another, and we also developed a number ofguidelines for creation of teaching materials like notes and assignments in a way that is morescreen-reader friendly.This paper shares key takeaways while also communicating student and teacher perspectives ondeveloping, teaching, and using more accessible materials. Our goal is to encourage
aremany factors that may contribute to this limited use of S-L in core engineering classes, includinglimited faculty and curriculum time, lack of knowledge of the pedagogy and its best practices,and challenges finding appropriate projects for specialized engineering topics. Capstone andelective classes typically have a broader focus that provides more flexibility for S-L.What is unique about this effort described in this paper is the integration of S-L into requiredcourses in the core curriculum, so that every student is exposed to the practice, either as arequired or as an optional aspect of the core class. Further, this study offers initial, inter-institutional research into benefits of S-L for engineering students specifically, a field of