Asee peer logo
Well-matched quotation marks can be used to demarcate phrases, and the + and - operators can be used to require or exclude words respectively
Displaying results 25231 - 25260 of 36275 in total
Conference Session
Value Added Collection Management
Collection
2003 Annual Conference
Authors
Karen Grigg
Session 2541The Evolution of the Patent and Trademark Depository Library and the Role of the Patent and Trademark Librarian in the Digital Age Karen S. Grigg North Carolina State University LibrariesAbstractThis paper discusses effective methods of delivering patent and trademark referenceassistance that support the university and library’s mission of time- and location-independent service. The North Carolina State University Libraries is the sole Patent andTrademark Depository Library (PTDL) in the state of North Carolina and, as such,supports a diverse and geographically scattered clientele
Conference Session
Product and Venture Creation Curriculum
Collection
2003 Annual Conference
Authors
Richard Brown; Michael McCorquodale
Session 1654 Academic and Professional Resources for Student-Led Technology Ventures Michael S. McCorquodale and Richard B. Brown Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Center for Wireless Integrated Microsystems University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2122AbstractStudent researchers face daunting challenges when attempting to commercialize technology thatthey have developed. Engineering students typically lack an overall understanding of the com
Conference Session
Current Issues in Information Technology
Collection
2003 Annual Conference
Authors
Chetan Sankar; P.K. Raju
Session 2558 Educating Engineers for the Information Age P.K. Raju, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Chetan S. Sankar, Department of Management Auburn University, AL 36849 Abstract Information technology, which is rapidly becoming one of the fundamentals of engineering,will soon be embedded in virtually every new product and process. In order to take fulladvantage of the wide range of new possibilities that are becoming available, the design ofproducts, systems, and services will require
Conference Session
Issues in Computer Education
Collection
2003 Annual Conference
Authors
Jerome Eric Luczaj; Chia Han
how the system outcome data are collected and analyzed. Section 5 providesconcluding remarks.2. Overview of classroom teaching and learningThe most common learning environment in schools is the scenario of one instructor/teacher (T)and many students (S) in classroom. The teacher teaches in a predominantly one-waycommunication fashion and, due to time and spatial constraints of the classroom, students learnpassively. Although this may be a most economic way of education in a large educationalsystem, it is not short of problems - lack of motivation, apathy, disinterest, inattention, andfrustration abound in both teacher and students. Many teachers blame the students and manystudents feel that they have learned nothing at all and fall ‘through
Conference Session
Issues in Computer Education
Collection
2003 Annual Conference
Authors
M. Sharma
-driven and theoretical material, but has good practical applications • requires students to shift their fundamental intuitions • deals with ideal and practical problems • deals with complex problems • involves approximations/assumptions and/or empirical questions • has design implicationsReferences[1] Taraban, R., E. E. Anderson, et al. (2002), Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for EngineeringEducation Annual Conference & Exposition.[2] Bhatia, S. R. Chemical Engineering Education, 2002, 310-315.[3] Anderson, E., M. P. Sharma, et al. (2002), Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for EngineeringEducation Annual Conference & Exposition.[4] Sharma, M. P. and G. Fetter (2001), Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for
Conference Session
ASEE Multimedia Session
Collection
2003 Annual Conference
Authors
Arne Weigold; M. P. Sharma; Edward Anderson; Roman Taraban
. This method excludesimportant factors that are part of situated learning—i.e., learning in real classrooms—where students define their own conditions of learning, set personal goals, and applylearning strategies on an individual basis. A contribution of the research here is that itcommunicates a sense of how student s use software implemented in a real course. In thediscussion, we ask how the present findings can be used to improve the effectiveness ofthe CD.An Interactive CD for Introductory ThermodynamicsE. E. Anderson (see authors) authored the CD used in this study. It was designed to goalong with the book Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach, 4th ed., by Cengel and
Conference Session
K-12 and Pre-college Engineering Poster Session
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cheryl Farmer, UTeachEngineering; David T. Allen, University of Texas, Austin; Leema Kuhn Berland, University of Texas, Austin; Richard H. Crawford, University of Texas, Austin; Lisa Guerra, NASA
Tagged Divisions
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
integrating content and process learning in the design of inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 355-385. 10. Guerra, L., Allen, D., Berland, L., Crawford, R., and Farmer, C. (2012). A Unique Approach to Characterizing the Engineering Design Process. American Society for Engineering Education: accepted for publication in annual conference proceedings. Page 25.533.19 11. Guerra, L., Christian, J., and Fowler, W. (2009). Space Systems Engineering: A NASA-Sponsored Approach for Aerospace Undergraduates. American Society for Engineering Education: AC 2009-768.12. Hamos, J., Kemnitzer, S
Conference Session
Stakeholder Perspectives on Community Engagement in Engineering Education
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder; Kurt Paterson P.E., Michigan Technological University; Chris Swan, Tufts University; John J. Duffy, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University; Nathan E. Canney, University of Colorado Boulder
Tagged Divisions
Community Engagement Division
, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography1. Swan, C.W., J.J. Duffy, K. Paterson, A. Bielefeldt, O. Pierrakos. 2011. The EFELTS Project – EngineeringFaculty Engagement in Learning Through Service. American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) AnnualConference Proceedings. Paper AC 2011-1324.2. Eyler, J., D. Giles. 1999. Where’s the Learning in Service-Learning? Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.3. Coyle, E. J., L. H. Jamieson and W.C. Oakes, EPICS: Engineering Projects in Community Service, InternationalJournal of Engineering Education, 21 (1), 2005, pp. 139-150.4. Duffy, J., E. Tsang, S. Lord. 2000. Service-Learning in
Conference Session
Retention of Women Students II
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kerry Meyers, University of Notre Dame; Catherine F. Pieronek, University of Notre Dame; Leo H. McWilliams, University of Notre Dame
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
25.556.16References: 1. M. Ohland, S. Sheppard, G. Lichtenstein, O. Eris, D. Chachra, and R. A. Layton, Persistence, engagement, and migration in engineering programs, Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 2008. 2. K. Smith, S. Sheppard, D. Johnson, and R. Johnson. Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices. Journal of Engineering Education. January 2005, pg. 1-15. 3. R. Felder and R. Brent. Understanding Student
Conference Session
Thermodynamics, Fluids, and Heat Transfer
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kyle A. Watson, University of the Pacific; Ashland O. Brown, University of the Pacific; Rachelle Kisst Hackett, University of the Pacific; Alexis Pham, University of the Pacific
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
both of these problems (i.e., numerical methods in two-dimensional heat conduction and transient heat conduction through semi-infinite mediums) have traditionally been challenging for students and an objective of the FE learning modules is to provide an alternative insight for students that will ideally make these topics easier to understand. The problems for each learning module are summarized in Figs. 1 and 2. The steady-state problem (Fig. 1) was adopted from an exercise at the end of Chapter 4 (“Two-Dimensional, Steady-State Conduction”) of Incropera et al.’s textbook6, while the transient, semi-infinite medium problem (Fig. 2) was adopted from an exercise at the end of Chapter 4 (“Transient Heat Conduction
Conference Session
Curricular Innovations in College-Industry Partnerships
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Thomas F. Wolff P.E., Michigan State University; Carmellia Davis-King, Michigan State University; Timothy J. Hinds, Michigan State University; Daina Briedis, Michigan State University
Tagged Divisions
College Industry Partnerships
fall of 2011 yielded someintriguing results regarding the co-curricular programming. Data showed that students wantedmore co-curricular programming that provided hands on experiences; they also wanted moreinformal presentations with personal interactions with the presenter(s), and more programs thatinvolved recent engineering alumni. They wanted presenters who could relate to them giventheir limited exposure to the field of engineering and their lack of professional experience. Byincorporating the feedback from our students, we are able to provide more consistent informalinteractions with students. We do this in the form of recent alumni programs, town hallmeetings, more frequent academic advising, and more meaningful personal
Conference Session
Tricks of the Trade
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ana T. Torres-Ayala, University of South Florida; Geoffrey L. Herman, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Tagged Divisions
Student
Educational Psychology, 25(1), 92–104.6. Ibid, p.957. Ibid, p.958. Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., and Norman, M. K. (2010). How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching. San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.9. Elliot, A. J. & Covington, M. V. (2001). Approach and Avoidance Motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 13 (2), 73–92.10. Elliot, A. J. & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72 (1), 218-232.11. Weiner, B. (2004). Attribution theory revisited: Transforming cultural plurality into theoretical unity. In McInerney, D. M., & Van Etten, S. (Eds.), Big theories revisited (pp 13
Conference Session
Service as an Element of Education
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Angie Martiza Bautista-Chavez, Rice University; Allison Nicole Garza, Rice University; Stephanie M. Herkes, Rice University; Nicholas W. McClendon, Rice University; Aaron Layne Sharpe, Rice University; Brent C. Houchens, Rice University; Kurt Jonathan Kienast, Rice University
Tagged Divisions
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
ofApplied Behavioral Science, 27, 269-284.Elis, S. J. (1978, Spring). American traditions of volunteerism and service-learning: The twentieth century,Synergist, pp. 3-39.Esmond, J. (2001). Count me in! 501 ideas on recruiting volunteers. Perth: NewseasonEsmond, J. and Dunlop P.. 2004. Developing the Volunteer Motivation Inventory to Assess the UnderlyingMotivational Drives of Volunteers in Western Australia.Fitch, R. T. (1987). Characteristics and motivations of college students volunteering for community service. Journalof College Student Personnel, 28, 424-431.Frisch, M.B., & Gerrard, M. (1981). Natural helping systems: Red Cross volunteers. American Journal ofCommunity Psychology, 9, 567-579.Gillespie, D.F., & King, A.E.O. (1985
Conference Session
Design in Freshman and Sophomore Courses
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Robert L. Nagel, James Madison University; Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University; Jacquelyn Kay Nagel, James Madison University; Eric C Pappas, James Madison University
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
N MeanApply knowledge of mathematics, 0 0 2 35 9 46 4.15science, and engineeringDesign and conduct experiments, as 0 2 4 30 10 46 4.04well as to analyze and interpret dataDesign a system, component, orprocess to meet desired needs withinrealistic constraints such as economic, 0 0 2 25 19 46 4.37environmental, social, political,ethical, health and safety,manufacturability, and sustainabilityFunction on multidisciplinary team(s) 1 1 6 26 12 46
Conference Session
Curricular Issues in Computer-oriented Programs
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Naser El-Bathy P.E., North Carolina A&T State University; Clay Samuel Gloster Jr., North Carolina A&T State University; Ghassan M. Azar; Cameron Seay, North Carolina A&T State Univeristy; Mohammed K. El-Bathy, Lawrence Technological University; Ibraheem A. Kateeb, North Carolina A&T State University; Rajeev K. Agrawal, North Carolina A&T State University; Aiman Ghassan Baset
Tagged Divisions
Computing & Information Technology
, Massachusetts: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2008.[19] N. Chaiyarataiia, A. M. S . Zalzala. Recent developments in evolutionary and genetic algorithms: theory and Page 25.1012.15 applications. Genetic Algorithms in Engineering Systems: Innovations and Applications. GALESIA 97. Second International Conference On (Conf. Publ. No. 446), pp. 270 – 277, 1997.[20] D. E. Rowley, D. G. Rhoades. The cognitive jogthrough: a fast-paced user interface evaluation procedure. CHI '92 Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, New York, 1992.[21] D. Pinelle, C. Gutwin. Groupware
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship and Design
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kevin Dahm, Rowan University; William Riddell, Rowan University; Tom Merrill, Rowan University; Leigh Weiss, Rowan University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
, J. Courtney, K. Dahm, J. Everett, C. Gabler, R. Harvey, L. Head, D. Hutto, H. Zhang, “Setting theMultidisciplinary Scene: Engineering Design and Communication in the ‘Hoistinator’ Project”, ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition, June 2005, Portland, OR.6. S. Bakrania, W. Riddell, K. Dahm and L. Weiss, “Wind Turbines for Teaching Parametric Design,” ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition, June 2009, Austin, TX.7. W. Riddell, M. Simone, S. Farrell, P.M. Jansson, “Communication in a Project Based Learning Design Course,”Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference, June, 2008, Pittsburgh, PA.8. S. Wilson, K. Blauth, W. Riddell and P. Jansson, “RFID Technology for Universally Accessible Doors in PublicBuildings,” The International Journal of
Conference Session
Attracting Young MINDS in Engineering - Part I
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Quintin Hughes, University of Oklahoma; Randa Shehab, University of Oklahoma
Tagged Divisions
Minorities in Engineering
in the U.S.,Black and Hispanic Americans represented 2.5 million (under 10.8 %) while White and AsianAmericans represented 19.6 million (nearly 87%). These percentages illustrate the vast disparitybetween the representation of White and Asian Americans and underrepresented minority groupsin the science and engineering workforce. The engineering workforce has an even more disparaterepresentation of underrepresented minorities with African American and Hispanic Americanscomprising only 4.7% of engineers, while White and Asian Americans represent 95%. NationalScience Board studies encourage the government’s leading science and engineering (S&E)organizations to consider under-represented groups as un-tapped resources with enormouspotential
Conference Session
Innovations in Civil Engineering Education II
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kristen Sanford Bernhardt, Lafayette College; Steven Beyerlein, University of Idaho; Andrea Bill, University of Wisconsin; Shashi Nambisan, Iowa State University; Ida van Schalkwyk, Oregon State University; Rod Turochy, Auburn University; Rhonda Young, Texas Christian University
Tagged Divisions
Civil Engineering
, Washington, D.C., pp 57-64.9. Handy, S, L. Weston, J. Song, K. Maria, and D. Lane, (2002), Education of Transportation Planning Professionals. Transportation Research Record No. 1812, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp 151-160.10. Krizek, K. and D. Levinson (2005). Teaching Integrated Land Use-Transportation Planning: Topics, Readings, Strategies. Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 24, pp 304-316.11. Zhou, J. and S. Soot (2006). Nationwide Survey of Transportation Planning Courses: Introduction, Findings, and Recommendations. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1956, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp 175-18312. Zhou, J. and L. Schweitzer (2009
Conference Session
Contemporary Issues in Engineering Ethics
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Seamus Freyne, Manhattan College; J.Patrick Abulencia, Manhattan College; Powell Draper, Manhattan College
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
toucheseveryone and to think critically about what they do on the job.Bibliography                                                                                                                1 Harris, Jr., C. E., Davis, M., Pritchard, M. S., Rabins, M. J., “Engineering Ethics: What? Why? How? And When?” Journal of Engineering Education, ASEE, 4/19962 Abraham, S., Knies, A. D., Kukral, K. L., and Willis, T. E., “Experiences in Discussing Ethics with Undergraduate Engineers,” Journal of Engineering Education, ASEE, 10/19973 Freyne, S. F. and Hale, W. M., “A Preliminary Survey of Engineering Ethics Courses Nationwide,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 20094 Hole, L. D., Radebaugh, D. W., and Soschinske, K. A
Conference Session
Improving Mechanics & Structural Modeling Courses
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Vincent Sabatini, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Ryle Maxson, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Darris White, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Jack McKisson, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; William Haupfear, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
AC 2010-1331: THE HYREV PROPULSION SYSTEM: A B20 POWER-SPLITEXTENDED RANGE ELECTRIC VEHICLE FOR THE ECOCAR CHALLENGEVincent Sabatini, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Vincent Sabatini is a second year graduate Mechanical Engineering student at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. He graduated from Embry-Riddle with an B. S. in Mechanical Engineering, with a focus in Robotics and High Performance Vehicles. He is currently the Team Leader for ERAU's EcoCAR Team, the EcoEagles.Ryle Maxson, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Ryle Maxson is a second year graduate Mechanical Engineering student at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. He graduated from Embry-Riddle with an B. S. in Aerospace
Conference Session
Curriculum Innovation & Assessment
Collection
2005 Annual Conference
Authors
Jo Howze; Jefferey Froyd; Kristi Shryock; Arun Srinivasa
described above and increase theinterests of Track B and C faculty members in the first-year engineering courses. In a completeimplementation, students in different sections of the first-year engineering courses may be doingdifferent projects, all of which meet the above specifications. Hopefully, a stream of projects cancontinue to be generated.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.0336591. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.Bibliographic Information1. Caso, R., Clark, C., Froyd, J.E., Inam, A., Kenimer, A.L., Morgan, J.R., and
Conference Session
Best Zone Paper Competition
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
James Hanson, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Patrick Brophy, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Council of Sections
Engineering, Inc.; MMS-A/E; Skidmore,Owings & Merrill LLP; Spencer Engineering, Inc.; Thorton-Thomasetti Group; andWalter P. Moore and Associates, Inc. The authors are very grateful to the Office ofInstitutional Research, Planning, and Assessment at Rose-Hulman for their assistancein developing and administering the surveys. The authors would also like to thankProfessor Mark Yoder from the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department atRose-Hulman for assistance with the Electrical Engineering examples.References1. Puri, P. S. (Moderator) “Computer Misuse – Are We Dealing with a Time Bomb?”, Forensic Engineering: Proceedings of the First Congress, Task Committee on Avoiding Failures Caused by Computer Misuse, Forensic Engineering Division
Conference Session
Innovation in ECET Programs
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Luciano Boglione, University of Massachusetts, Lowell
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
· Wave equation in the frequency domain · Propagation constant k 3. The boundary conditions · Incident and reflected waves · Changing reference system (x = l − d) · Reflection coefficient Γ 4. The scattering matrix S · Scattering matrix S of a transmission line · Obtaining Sij (general case) · The Smith chart 5. Practical transmission lines · Ideal vs. real transmission line · Microstrip line · Introduction to
Conference Session
Lean Manufacturing and Integration
Collection
2005 Annual Conference
Authors
Patricio Torres; Matthew Stephens
that moves between provider and the user. Jacobs (2003) presents a formula to calculatethe number of Kanban card sets: Each container represents the minimum production lot size to be manufactured. Hence, the number of containers controls the amount of work-in-process inventory in the system. The number of kanban card sets is determined by the formula: k = expected demand during lead time + safety stock size of the container k = DL (1+S) . C Page 10.730.7 ( p. 432).Proceedings of the 2005 American Society
Conference Session
Aerospace Technical Session
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michele Dischino, Central Connecticut State University; Nidal Al-Masoud, Central Connecticut State University; Peter Baumann, Central Connecticut State University; Viatcheslav Naoumov, Central Connecticut State University; Zdzislaw Kremens, Central Connecticut State University
Tagged Divisions
Aerospace
minority program. Southern Economic Journal, 2005. 72(1): p. 78-97.15. S Russell, M Hancock, and J McCullough, The Pipeline: Benefits of Undergraduate Research Opportunities. Science 316 (5824):548 549, 2007. 316(5824): p. 548-549.16. M Summers and F Hrabowski, Preparing minority scientists and engineers. Science 2006. 311(5769): p. 1870- 1871.17. Office of Research-Labor Market Information, Connecticut Careers in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). 2008, Connecticut Department of Labor.18. Office of Research-Labor Market Information Connecticut Forecast: Occupational Projections: 2006-16. Accessed March 14, 2010, http://www1.ctdol.state.ct.us/lmi/forecast2006-2016/ctforecast.asp.19. S
Conference Session
Research on the First Year I
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rhonda Kowalchuk, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale; Tarnisha Green, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale; Robert Ricks, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale; John Nicklow, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
TestMeasure df t-test p-value Mean diff Cohen’s d2007 Algebra 20 3.62 .0017 10.91 0.52 Trigonometry 20 4.26 .0004 12.10 0.902008 Algebra 11 5.43 .0002 15.50 1.03 Trigonometry 11 4.58 .0008 15.66 1.26Note. Mean diff = Mean difference (post – pre); X post − X pre s 2post + s 2pre Cohen’s d = where s p = sp 2 Page 15.536.7Math Course PlacementTo further assess the Summer Bridge Program with regards
Conference Session
Case Studies, Engineering Education and Outcome Assessment Around the Globe
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Robert Todd, Brigham Young University; Randy Lewis, Brigham Young University; Jim Nelson, Brigham Young University; Brent Nelson, Brigham Young University; Michael Miles, Brigham Young University
Tagged Divisions
International
has greatly benefited from hiring employees that participated in an international experience. 6. International experiences enhance a prospective employee’s abilities in… Leadership. Teamwork. Innovation. Global Awareness. Character Development. Technical Competence. Motivation/Career Goals. Other:My company hires in the following area(s):___ Chemical Engineering ___ Industrial Design___ Civil and Environmental Engineering ___ Information Technology___ Construction Management ___ Manufacturing___ Electrical and Computer Engineering ___ Mechanical Engineering
Conference Session
Innovative Courses/Pedagogies in Liberal Education II
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Katherine Wikoff, Milwaukee School of Engineering
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education
, he does without rather than make amistake.It is hard to accept seemingly pointless learning, especially in a field that values linearaccrual of knowledge. But as Jobs says, you can’t connect the dots looking forward.Informal, self-directed learning may lead nowhere—or, it may lead to true innovation, asin the design of the Macintosh. If innovation is what we want from a “thinking society,”rather than mere competence, then the challenge for engineering education is to fosterstudents’ ability to engage in lifelong learning in the absence of an immediate payoff interms of grades, certification, or other resume-enhancing qualification. REFERENCES[1] Jobs, S. (2005). Commencement address delivered at
Conference Session
Aerospace Technical Session
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kerri Phillips, West Virginia University; Giampiero Campa, The MathWorks, Inc.; Srikanth Gururajan, West Virginia University; Marcello Napolitano, West Virginia University
Tagged Divisions
Aerospace
Pitch Rate 30 ) g 20 e d( α, 10 ) c e 0 s g/ e d( -10 q ), g -20 e d( iH -30 -40 -50 478.5 479 479.5 480 480.5 481 481.5 482 482.5 483 483.5 Time (sec) Figure 7: Flight Data Segment used for Parameter Identification15A
Conference Session
Build Diversity in Engineering Graduate Programs
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Abhijit Nagchaudhuri, University of Maryland, Eastern Shore; Terry Teays, Johns Hopkins University; Mary Bowden, University of Maryland at College Park; Guangming Chen, Morgan State University; Richard Henry, Johns Hopkins University
Tagged Divisions
Minorities in Engineering
, andMr. Darren Taillie (all from UMCP) did a splendid job over the summer; their efforts are alsogratefully acknowledged.Bibliography1. Birdsong, C., and Schuster, P., “Research in the Undergraduate Environment”, Proceedings of 2006 Annual Conference and Exposition of American Society for Engineering Education, June, 2006, Chicago, Illinois, USA.2. Eisenman. S., and List, G., “The Undergraduate Research Advantage : The Split Perspective” Proceedings of 2004 Annual Conference and Exposition of American Society for Engineering Education, June, 2004, Salt lake City, Utah, USA. Page 15.245.143. Peten, G., Sawhney, A