. Krivickas and J. Krivickas, “Laboratory Instruction in Engineering Education,” GlobalJournal of Engineering Education, Volume 11, No. 2, June 2007.[7] D. A. H. Samuelsen and O. H. Graven, “Remote Laboratories in Engineering Education – anOverview of Implementation and Feasibility,” 14th International Multi-Conference forEngineering, Education, and Technology: Engineering Innovations for Global sustainability, SanJose, Costa Rica, July 2016.[8] A. Yousuf, A. Wong, and D. W. Edens, “Remote Circuit Design Labs with Analog Discovery,”2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, June 2013.[9] S. Abbasi, E. M. Kim, and T. F. Schubert, “Digilent Analog Discovery and Bench-topInstruments: A Comparison,” 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &
relationships between these factorsand peer rating scores in the context of college course teamwork. We used Tandem to collectpeer rating data from 5,322 college students at a Midwest research university spanning the periodfrom 2019 to 2023. Our analysis reveals statistically significant associations between students’peer rating values and their personal factors. Female students, students with higher GPAs, orthose preferring working alone were more likely assigned higher peer ratings, while those ratingthemselves higher in extraversion and task control tended to receive lower ratings. In addition,the multiple-way interactions among personal characteristics suggest that academic performanceis more influential among these factors analyzed. These results
students use rules andstructured processes to come to the one “right” solution. While in many cases, this strategy isuseful and necessary, real life is complex, dynamic, and imprecise enough that it is unrealistic tothink that problems have only one solution. Therefore, students need to learn how to use truecreative thinking. Realizing this contemporary demand, the Accreditation Board for Engineeringand Technology (ABET) 2018-2019 criteria1 shifted the emphasis of engineering curriculum byidentifying creative problem-solving skill as a vital component for improving the future ofengineering and engineering education. Particularly, ABET 2000 Criteria1 requires visualization,cognitive model, communication, teamwork and creative problem solving.In
Affecting PhD Student Success. International journal of exercise science, 12(1), 34–45.[5] Cass, C., Kirn, A., Tsugawa, M. A., Perkins, H., Chestnut, J. N., Briggs, D. E., & Miller, B. (2017, June), Board # 18 : Improving Performance and Retention of Engineering Graduate Students through Motivation and Identity Formation Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. 10.18260/1-2--27798[6] Perkins, H., Tsugawa-Nieves, M., Bahnson, M., Satterfield, D., Parker, M., Kirn, A., & Cass, C. (2019). Motivation Profiles of engineering doctoral students and implications for persistence. 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). https://doi.org/10.1109
M.C. Richey, “The wisdom of winter is madness in May,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 156-160, 2019.[3] R.A. Cheville, “Board # 22 : Ecosystems as Analogies for Engineering Education,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017.[4] W. Lee, “Pipelines, pathways, and ecosystems: An argument for participation paradigms,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 8-12, 2019.[5] S. Lord, M. Ohland, R.A. Layton, and M. Camacho, “Beyond pipeline and pathways: Ecosystem metrics,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 32-56, 2019.[6] L. Vanasupa and L. Schlemer, “Transcending Industrial Era Paradigms: Exploring Together the Meaning of Academic Leadership for Diversity
supported to increase their motivation to choose and pursuebaccalaureate degree attainment.References[1] N. S. Board, “Higher Education in Science and Engineering,” Natl. Sci. Found., vol. 7, 2019.[2] A. Herman, “America’s STEM Crisis Threatens Our National Security,” 2019.[3] National Science Board, “Science & Engineering Indicators 2020,” High. Educ. Sci. Eng., vol. 7, pp. 1–67, 2019.[4] M. R. Anderson-Rowland and A. A. Rodriguez, “Sophomore transfers: Who are they and what support do they need?,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 122nd ASEE, no. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society, 2015.[5] X. Chen, “First-Generation Students in Postsecondary Education: A Look at Their
studies. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 The Impact of Multidisciplinary Teams on Sustainability Projects in EPICSAbstractThe Engineering Projects in Community Service (EPICS) program is a service-learning programfounded by Purdue University in 1995 and is now an active part of the Arizona State Universitycurriculum. Compared to traditional service learning, EPICS differs by implementing studentlearning through design projects with real community partners, multidisciplinary teams, industrymentors, and projects that span multiple semesters with potentially new student teams everysemester. In this work, the multidisciplinary team factor is examined due to the
the 2021 ASEE Annual Conference, Virtual, 2021.[4] A. M. Johnson, G. Ozogul, J. Reisslein, and M. Reisslein, "Evaluating an Engineering Overview Brochure for Educational Outreach to Elementary Schools."[5] P. Molina-Gaudo, S. Baldassarri, M. Villarroya-Gaudo, and E. Cerezo, "Perception and intention in relation to engineering: A gendered study based on a one-day outreach activity," IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 61-70, 2009.[6] J. Blandino and J.-M. Hardin, "Assessing the Impact of Engineering Outreach Frequency on Middle-school Students' Interest in Engineering," in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA, 2015, pp. 26.249. 1-26.249. 14.[7] C. Demetry and
Guevara, J. C. Tudón Martínez, D. Hernández Alcántara, and R. Morales-Menendez, “Active learning in engineering education. A review of fundamentals, best practices and experiences,” Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. IJIDeM, vol. 13, pp. 909–922, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s12008-019-00557-8[3] S. Olson and D. G. Riordan, “Engage to excel: producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Report to the president.,” Exec. Off. Pres., 2012, https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ed541511.[4] E. ASEE, “Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering: Phase II: Insights from tommorow’s engineers,” Wash. DC Natl. Sci. Found., 2017.[5] A. J. James, C. K. Chin, and B. R. Williams
Technology by the Numbers 2019, Washington, D.C.: American Society for Engineering Eduation, 2020.[2] L. P. Ford, J. Brennan, J. Cole, K. D. Dahm, M. V. Jamison, L. J. Landherr, D. L. Silverstein, B. K. Vaughen, M. A. Vigeant and S. W. Thiel, "How We Teach: Chemical Engineering in the First Year," in 127th ASEE Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada, 2020.[3] D. L. Silverstein and M. Vigeant, "Results of the 2010 Survey on Teaching Chemical Reaction Engineering," Chemical Engineering Education, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 31-40, 2012.[4] H. S. Fogler, Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering, Pearson, 2016.[5] H. S. Fogler, Essentials of Chemical Reaction Engineering, Pearson, 2018.[6] D. L. Silverstein and M. A. Vigeant, "How We Teach
. Nieminen, and E. Pyörälä, “How Do Tutors Intervene WhenConflicts on Knowledge Arise in Tutorial Groups?,” Advances in Health Sciences Education, vol19-3, pp. 329–345. 2014.[45] D. Pai, A. Kelkar, R.A. Layton, M. Schulz, D. Dunn, S. Owusu-Ofori and A. Duraphe, “Verticalintegration of the undergraduate learning experience,” Proceedings of the ASEE, 1998.[46] D. Fung, A Connected Curriculum for Higher Education, UCLPress, London, 2017.[47] S.M. Strachan, S. Marshall, P. Murray, E.J. Coyle, and J. Sonnenberg-Klein, “Using verticallyintegrated projects to embed research-based education for sustainable development in undergraduatecurricula,” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, vol 20-8, pp. 2019.[48] General Practice Education
and they have no resale value. Eachcourse implements the workbooks in different ways with different content to fit their particularcourse structure or instructional style. These different implementations are discussed below.Computer Applications Course The Computer Applications course at The Citadel is typically taken during sophomoreyear and focuses on teaching students computer-aided design (CAD) using SolidWorks.Workbooks were implemented into this course for the first time in Fall 2019 and is the first in-major course in the Mechanical Engineering curriculum in which students utilize a courseworkbook. This course was transitioned to a flipped classroom in Fall 2016 and the requirementfor a course textbook was removed in Fall 2017
added value. Considerations and viability,” J. Eng. Des., vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 568–589, 2016.[12] C. W. S. Scott F. Kiefer, “Benefits of Mentoring Students in Design Competitions,” in 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2011, pp. 22.278.1–22.278.9.[13] D. R. P. E, J. Blacklock, and J. M. Bach, “Letting Students Learn Through Making Mistakes: Teaching Hardware and Software Early in an Academic Career,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2015, pp. 26.1089.1–26.1089.8.[14] University of Colorado, Boulder, “Engineering Design Process,” Teach Engineering. [Online]. Available: https://www.teachengineering.org/k12engineering/designprocess. [Accessed: 27-Jan-2019].[15] Y. Haik, T. M. Shahin, and S
Results on an Innovative Homework Process,” p. 10.[11] A. Badir and R. O’Neill, “Homework Graded by Students,” in ASEE Conf. Proc., Jun. 2017, doi: 10.18260/1-2--28440.[12] Derek Breid, “Replacing Cheating with Metacognition – Reevaluating the Pedagogical Role of Homework in Foundational Engineering Courses,” Tampa, Florida, Jun. 2019, [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/33237.[13] D. G. Kay, “Large introductory computer science classes: strategies for effective course management,” ACM SIGCSE Bull., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 131–134, 1998.[14] P. G. Sokolove and G. Marbach-Ad, “The Benefits of Out-of-Class Group Study for Improving Student Performance on Exams: A Comparison of Outcomes in Active-Learning and
Pedagogy for Antiracist Social Studies Teaching,” Multicult. Perspect., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 87–94, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1080/15210960.2021.1914047.[30] V. Townsend and (Ruth) Urbanic, “Project Management Learning Takes Flight,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Indianapolis, Indiana: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2014, p. 24.1015.1-24.1015.16. doi: 10.18260/1-2--22948.[31] S. Hodge, “Transformative Learning for Knowledge: From Meaning Perspectives to Threshold Concepts,” J. Transform. Educ., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 133–153, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1177/1541344618770030.[32] K. Nicola-Richmond, G. Pépin, H. Larkin, and C. Taylor, “Threshold concepts in higher education: a synthesis of the literature relating to
," Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, FL, United States of America, June 15-19, 2019.[5] O. Oje, O. Adesope, R. M. Wong, B. J. Van Wie, and P. Dutta, "Hands-on in Engineering Classrooms: A Comparison of Online versus Face-to-Face Delivery," Proceedings of American Educational Research Association Conference, Orlando, FL, April 9-12, 2021.[6] C. Watson, J. B. Gartner, B. J. VanWie, Dutta P., O. O. Adesope, and H. Curtis, "The Effects of Prior Knowledge on Learning with Low-Cost Desktop Learning Modules," Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 26-29, 2022.[7] O. J. Ajeigbe et al., "Gender-Related Effects on Learning with Hands-On Modules in
. doi: 10.1142/9789812562241_0004 12. J. Portillo and A. Alvarado (2022). Our results and experience with an adaptive remedial course [manuscript in preparation]. 13. G. Illescas, A. Alvarado, and J. Portillo, “Active, topic-centered learning”, in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 2020. 14. P. J. Guo, J. Kim, and R. Rubin, “How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos”, in Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning @ scale conference, 2014. 15. J. Luca and C. Mcloughlin, Using online forums to support a community of learning. AACE, 2004.16. “Galileo Educational System”, Galileo.edu. [Online]. Available: https://www.galileo.edu
, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1015-1033, 2018.[9] M. Borrego and L. K. Newswander, "Definitions of Interdisciplinary Research: Toward Graduate-Level Interdisciplinary Learning Outcomes," The Review of Higher Education, pp. 61-84, 2010.[10] B. G. Hawkins and J. Eason, "Laboratory Course Development for Biomedical Signals and Systems," in ASEE Pacific Southwest Section Meeting, Los Angeles, 2019.[11] W. E. Schiesser, "Diabetes Glucose Tolerance Test," in Differential Equation Analysis in Biomedical Science and Engineering: Ordinary Differential Equation Applications with R, Hoboken, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2014, pp. 79-143.Appendix IQuestionnaire text sent to students after completing BMED 310. Abbreviations are used
received a master’s degree from Tulane University in 1989 and a doctoral degree from Duke University in 1992. He is a member of the American Society for Mechanical Engineers (ASME), American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), and, American Society for Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASABE) and is actively involved in teaching and research in the fields of (i) robotics and mechatronics, (ii) remote sensing and precision agriculture, and,(iii) biofuels and renewable energyMadhumi Mitra (Professor) Dr. Mitra is a professor of Environmental Sciences at the University of Maryland Eastern Shore. Her research areas are in Bioenergy; Bioremediation; and Biosorption studies of aquatic plants.Travis FordCharles
psychiatric conditions, most students still donot report their disabilities to their university (National Center for Education Statistics) [1]. Forexample, a recent study by Love at the University of Wisconsin found that 75% of students withdisabilities chose not to inform their instructor [2].Similarly, the University of Illinois’s 2019 Chancellor Survey found that SWDs are substantiallyunderserved [3]; 8% had indicated a disability, and 28% of them stated their disability needswere not being met. This highlights the need to further investigate which factors influence thesuccess of SWDs, especially when a large proportion of them may hesitate to disclose theirstatus.Universal Design for LearningUDL (Universal Design for Learning) is a pedagogical
Black female faculty member in the Department of Computer Science. Her professional experience also includes Winthrop University, The Aerospace Corporation, and IBM. She is a graduate of Johnson C. Smith University (B.S., ‘00) and North Carolina State University (M.S., ’02; Ph.D., ’05), becoming the first Black woman to earn a Ph.D. in computer science at the university and 2019 Computer Science Hall of Fame Inductee. She is a native of Durham, NC. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Work in Progress: A Novel Professional Development Program for Addressing Systemic Barriers to Computing Participation1
communities.Darren Wang, Stony Brook University Darren Wang is currently a freshman at Stony Brook University pursuing a B.E. degree in biomedical engineering. He was involved in the Robotics Team of John Jay High School in Wappingers Central School District, NY, as a founding member and the club president for three years (2019 - 2022) where he designed and coordinated the Dream-Think-Create (DTC) program in collaboration with faculty and students at SUNY New Paltz. The DTC program works to increase interest and prowess in engineering among highschoolers. His recent research interests include developmental biology, biological manufac- turing, and additive manufacturing.James M. Amodio, John Jay High School, Wappingers Central
write about what they learned from the process [2]. - Can a structured process of transferring knowledge and technical references between oldDetailed teaching materials on this assignment are available on the KEEN Engineering and new teams be incorporated into capstone design?Unleashed Website [3]. These references show how the project increased student interest inusing university makerspaces and fabrication facilities for hands-on personal projects, but the Design/Methodprior work did not explore student attitudes about the teaching elements of the project. Multiple approaches were taken from 2019
2018, Minneapolis, Minnesota.[11] Collins, W., Kim, J., Redden, L., & Herlong, J. (2019). “Mobile device utilization in classes by faculty of ASC-member and ACCE-accredited construction programs.” Associated Schools of Construction Annual Conference. 2019, Denver, Colorado. (Accepted for publication).[12] Cline, R., and Davis, K. (2013). “Using mobile technology in a construction management “hands-on” laboratory.” 120th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition. Atlanta, Georgia.[13] National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Task-Load Index website, accessed on 1/27/2019 at https://humansystems.arc.nasa.gov/groups/TLX/[14] Mohammadi M
machinery, piping, and structures; Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD); fluid dynamic design and analysis of turbomachinery (compressors, turbines, fans and pumps); root cause failure analysis; de- velopment of engineering software; and engineering design audits. While in industry he taught a number of professional short courses and seminars to both specialist and non-specialist audiences, and provided personalized technical and software training to industrial clients. He holds Bachelor’s, Master’s, and Doctoral Degrees from the M.I.T. Department of Aeronautics & Astronautics. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Study of Hydraulic Losses in Gravity-Driven Pipe Flow: An Exercise
future work, assessment of thesuccess of the course curriculum will be completed through qualitative analysis of studentreflections, interviews and document analysis of student work. Additionally changes in students’attitudes towards engineering and social responsibility will be assessed through quantitativeanalysis.IntroductionSocial Responsibility, Social Justice, and Ethics in Engineering EducationDeveloping engineers who are capable of understanding their social responsibility in the world isbecoming increasingly important. This has been recognized by the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology, Inc. (ABET) which, as part of their 2019 - 2020 criteria foraccrediting engineering programs, includes the following student outcome for
at the secondary and post-secondary levels.Todd M. Fernandez, Georgia Institute of Technology Todd is a lecturer in the Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology. His research interests are about engineering students beliefs about knowledge and their formation through the engineering education experience.Dr. Kali Lynn MorganDr. Paul Benkeser, Georgia Institute of Technology Paul J. Benkeser is a professor and Senior Associate Chair in the Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Tech and Emory University. He is past chair of ASEE BED and has served a number of roles for IEEE EMBS.Prof. Joseph M LeDoux, Georgia Institute of Technology Joe Le
from Mankato State University, master’s and doctorate degrees from the University of Iowa and decades of award-winning teaching and research at the University of Nebraska – Lincoln, Bonnstetter has amassed an arsenal of recognition and research, including the first recipient of the National Senior Outstanding Science Educator of the Year Award and the only secondary science prepa- ration program recognized in the national Search for Excellence in Science Education. Dr. Bonnstetter was honored with the 2019-2020 Joe Kamiya First-Person Science Award during the annual conference of the International Society of Neurofeedback and Research (ISNR). The award is named in honor of Dr. Joe Kamiya who was the first to
. [Accessed: Jan. 25, 2019]. [4] Kinnear, P., Stickel, M., Frank, B.M., Kaupp, J.A., “Early English Language Assessment to Improve First-Year Student Success,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2016, New Orleans, LA, USA, [Online]. Available: 10.18260/p.26876. [Accessed: March 20, 2019].[5] Hassall, T., Joyce, J., Bramhall, M. D., Robinson, I. M., & Arquero, J. L., “The sound of silence? A comparative study of the barriers to communication skills development in accounting and engineering students,” Industry and Higher Education, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 392-398, October 2005.[6] Britton, W. E., “The trouble with technical writing is freshman English,” Journal of Technical Writing and
, and has led the development of the project ”Systemic Transformation of Education Through Evidence-based Reforms”, which he submitted to NSF; it was approved by NSF in 2015 (NSF-DUE 1525574). He now serves as PI of this 5-year, $3,000,000 IUSE project that seeks to get faculty in a research intensive university to adopt evidence-based teaching practices, and to change the system to one that values and rewards both teaching and research, with an end result of increasing graduation rates and numbers in the STEM disciplinesDr. Robert L Potter, University of South Florida c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019