Conference Session

AERO 1: Rocketry and Space Education

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Juhyun Kim, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Timothy Plomin, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Heather Ruth Arnett, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Luisa-Maria Rosu, I-STEM, (Illinois Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics) Education Initiative; Joshua Rovey, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace Division (AERO)

, assumptions in their model, and how realrockets and rocket scientists might address these issues.Early plans for this activity shifted too much responsibility onto students and teachers to learnnew material. The first iteration had little scaffolding and only a short video that presented theactivity. There were plans to have options for both python and spreadsheet plotting, but at highschool PD events teachers explained that they, as well as the students, need more practice andexperience in both software. Even with limited experience in spreadsheet software, teachersexpressed excitement during the demonstration of the plotting in Google Sheets activity. Sincereceiving this feedback, the course was adjusted to include extra tutorial videos for the

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division (WIED) Technical Session 6

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering Division (WIED)

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 6

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Masoumeh Farhadi Nia, University of Massachusetts, Lowell; Grace E. Callen; Gayatri Aroskar, University of Massachusetts, Lowell; Justin An, University of the District of Columbia; Kavitha Chandra, University of Massachusetts, Lowell; Charles Thompson, Ph.D., University of Massachusetts, Lowell; Kelilah Wolkowicz, University of Massachusetts, Lowell; Max Denis, University of the District of Columbia

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

papers that summarized the main idea or argument in that section. Revisiting our message box • Identified and defined the problem to be addressed in the paper. • Defined our audience. • Organized our thoughts to address the problem and create a solution. • Implemented the planned solution to fulfill our goal to solve the defined problem. • Discussed benefits of the defined solution to the problem. Improving our message and • Continued to improve upon the message box from previous workshops by those of other teams comparing our message box to

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE) Technical Session 6: Engineering in the Home

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peter N. Knox, University of Vermont; Amber Simpson, State University of New York at Binghamton; Adam V. Maltese, Indiana University-Bloomington

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

moments.Increased Awareness of Parent Reactions to Child EmotionsOne primary theme that emerged amongst participating parents was an awareness of themselvesand their methods of handling frustration or set-back. This recognition often occurred throughobserving their children’s frustration or failure and reflecting on their approach oracknowledgement of it. Children’s frustration was often readily perceived by parents andsubsequently understood or supported as a natural or even beneficial component to learning. Inacknowledging their children’s frustrations and moments when things did not go according tooriginal plans (i.e., failures), many parents chose to model tactics for working through it orsuggested ways that children might move beyond frustration.One

Conference Session

Committee on Educational Policy Presents: Pillars of Our Curriculum

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laura Gutierrez-Bucheli, Monash University; Alan Reid, Monash University; Gillian Kidman, Monash University; Julia Lamborn, P.E., Monash University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL)

carried out a solid waste management planning activity for a population. We had to estimate the mass of waste per capita and then by population, and the distance to the nearest landfill was considered, cost of transportation, and recycling use. We chose the population. (Student A, Colombian University)Focusing less on the design of sanitation facilities, students had to work in a ‘real-life’ contextto diagnose the current conditions and, based on that, propose solutions to ensure an adequateand sufficient supply of services, considering cultural and contextual variables. One educatorexplained: The students realise that there are populations with sanitary units but do not treat wastewater or do not have sanitary

Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division (IND) Technical Session 3

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ekaterina Koromyslova, South Dakota State University; Carrie Steinlicht, South Dakota State University; Miriam Kanini Peter

Tagged Divisions

Industrial Engineering Division (IND)

Collection

2022 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

sunil Dehipawala, City University of New York, Queensborough Community College; Dimitrios S. Kokkinos, City University of New York, Queensborough Community College; Rex Taibu; George Tremberger Jr; Tak Cheung

resources for multiple internet accesses and private physics informationservices. Our university is planning to purchase the McGraw Hill Publishing Proctoriotechnology. Student Government Newspapers articles were up in arms with objections,consistent with more anxiety. The student cheating and plagiarism issues in online coursesduring the COVID challenge could be alleviated using the divergent thinking exercises describedabove. The asking of a graphic solution is less likely to be found on pay-for-answer websitessuch as Chegg.com, and the asking of a graphic solution would then be more likely to preventplagiarism. While grading is a legal contractual obligation, the assessment at second priority is aprofessional obligation. Exercises with full

Conference Session

PCEE Session 12: STEM, Technology, and Engineering Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ryan Brown, Illinois State University; Allison Antink-Meyer, Illinois State University

world how similarities Analyze the rate of Conduct research Develop a plan that around them guides and differences technological to inform incorporates technological among scientific, development and intentional knowledge from development and mathematics, predict future inventions and science, engineering design engineering, and diffusion and innovations mathematics, and technological adoption of new other

Conference Session

LEES 7: Experiments in Experiential and Project-Based Learning

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joanna Burchfield, University of South Florida; Olukemi Akintewe, University of South Florida; Jamie Chilton, University of South Florida

more substantial engagements, such as in the aforementioned Economicscourse, would be most beneficial to students. Such “checkpoints” could be structured as guestlectures and/or course modules that focus on specific communication competencies that fit intothe structures and lesson plans of existing engineering courses. For example, courses that useteamwork could import teamwork specific modules Dr. Olukemi Akintewe is the Director of theFoundations of Engineering Lab course, which is required for all first-year engineering students.Drs. Akintewe and Burchfield collaborated to investigate how students might be impacted by ashort, targeted lecture on intercultural communication and teamwork prior to being assigned totheir course project teams

Conference Session

EMD Technical Session 1: Captstone, Ethics, and Statistical Methods

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Jaurez, National University; Ben Radhakrishnan, National University; Nelson Altamirano, National University

the product realization process (i.e. implementation tomeet the product requirements for the customer) ending with delivery to the customer. Themanagement processes include key activities such as planning, decision analysis, and technicaldata management which are key to the current research. Figure 1 - System Engineering Technical and Management Processes for Defense Systems ( DAG - Defence Acquisition Guidebook) [4].University of Berkeley, CA, further expanded the V-diagram life cycle timeline model with amore detailed definition of both decomposition and integration sections as shown in Figure 2below [5]. Figure 2 – Detailed Phases of Systems Engineering [5]Among the Cross-Cutting activities noted

Conference Session

CIT Division Technical Session #1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sam Siewert, California State University, Chico; Rishab Shah, University of Colorado Boulder

can attempthard problems early. Based on their challenge experienced, it is believed that they will learnevaluative and creative service design concepts earlier. To assess whether this is true, we plan tonot only rely up final course feedback, but also a mid-course survey. The survey questions willuse a Likert scale to solicit feedback from students. While the survey is not fully developed, hereare examples in consideration. Table 1. Mid-Course Student Sentiment Regrading RTES Simulation I have found that simulation-based workloads where I must apply fixed priority RM policy have helped me to think critically about service design and apply RMA. # students polled

Conference Session

Research Frameworks for Identity and Equity: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 9

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alicia Washington, Duke University

with, and learn from others; thinkcritically about the topics in the context of their positionality, and interrogate the impacts of thesetopics on both their identities and others’.Course implementationThe course was piloted in the fall 2020 semester and was offered in the subsequent spring 2021and fall 2021 semesters. While initially planned as an in-person course, university restrictionsdue to the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in fully remote implementations in the first twosemesters (2020-2021 academic year). Creating a remote course required several considerations.First, class lectures were held via Zoom. However, the university Zoom license did not includeclosed captioning in the 2020-2021 academic year, which meant that students needing it

Conference Session

PCEE Session 13: Equity in P-12 Engineering Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christine Cunningham, Pennsylvania State University; Gregory Kelly, Pennsylvania State University

ideas and make a plan, they are invited tomanipulate materials swatches, gesture, draw, and talk with their partner to share their ideas anddecide on a plan. YES materials are also designed to promote language development. Drawingfrom best practices for language learners, all units provide visual scaffolds, have studentsgenerate language in group discussion, and provide tips for educators about strategies that canenhance students’ communicative abilities.Engineering IdentityTaken together, socially engaged engineering, authentic engineering practices, and asset-basedpedagogies, foster educational experiences that can lead to improved learning of disciplinaryknowledge and an engineering identity and mindset. Figure 1 shows how these three

Conference Session

PCEE Session 13: Equity in P-12 Engineering Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah Lilly, University of Virginia; Anne McAlister, University of Virginia; Jennifer Chiu, University of Virginia

curricula have the potential to engage students, teachers playa critical role in the kinds of opportunities that are afforded to students. Teachers may useengineering curricular materials as planned by the designers or make customizations to fit thespecific contexts of their students (e.g., Guzey et al., 2017; Van Haneghan et al., 2015). Forexample, teachers can make instructional decisions to bring in and value their students’ culturesand ideas within engineering projects (Wilson-Lopez & Garlick, 2017). In this way, teachersnecessarily filter the ways that engineering curricular materials are implemented in theirclassrooms (e.g., Lilly, Chiu, et al., 2021; Remillard, 1999).However, teachers, and specifically elementary teachers, can face

Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sanaz Motamedi, University of Florida; Mckenzie Landrum, University of Florida; Tara Ippolito, University of Florida; Austin Hayes

previous experience with RStudio, 8.57% hadminor experience, and only 1.43% had significant experience. Furthermore, 91.43% of studentshad no internship experience applying the topics taught in this course, but 64.29% plan to in thefuture or during their career.Course Overview The course we decided to focus on for this study is an introductory applications-basedstatistics course. It is a foundational statistics course that includes heavy theoretical concepts aswell as the use of the software RStudio. The class meets three times a week. Two of the sessionsare 100 minutes long, while the third session is 50 minutes long. Of the weekly class time,approximately four hours are spent on instruction and approximately one hour is reserved for a

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 10: Best of First-Year Programs Division

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Victor Garcia; Peter Golding, University of Texas at El Paso; Diane Golding, University of Texas at El Paso; Irma Torres-Catanach; Nora Cuvelier, University of Texas at El Paso; Crystal Cholewa; Karla Ayala Mendoza

the impacts that the Covid-19 pandemic, in particular the social isolation and requirement ofvirtual instruction, was having on students’ academic and emotional well-being. The successfulimplementation outcomes of the new curriculum design were well appreciated by thecorresponding engineering department, who supported the initiative to create a new introductoryengineering course under the degree plan of the Engineering Leadership and Education department.Objectives and Scope of WorkThis paper aims to present the outcomes from the first implementation of a new curriculum design,which was recently adopted for an introductory engineering course to increase the self-empowerment of first-year undergraduate students at a Hispanic Serving

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy - Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin

learners to managetensions inherent in their environment. Because most students already live in such environmentsteaching definable or enumerable outcomes makes less sense than helping student to bemetacognitive and reflective how they manage and relate with technology.IntroductionThis paper uses technological literacy as a foil, to reflect back a vision of technology andengineering education that can lay claim to be better than what currently exists. Making a claimto be better sets up several conditions on the claimant – to identify what needs to be improvedand why; to craft a credible plan explaining why the situation will be improved in some specificway; and that any change will not have unpredicted negative consequences, particularly forgroups

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 11: Program Descriptions and Learning Analytics

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laura Cruz Castro, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Tiantian Li, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Leyla Ciner; Kerrie Douglas, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Christopher Brinton, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

# Objects # Objects Section 1 Section 2 Career Refers to videos, plans of studies, and external links 69 69exploration that were designed to help students explore the different engineering disciplines.Assessment Refers to any traditional grading object, such as 48 41 quizzes, homework, and activities for extra credit for which the students receive a grade. This category was left out from the modeling, as it was directly related to the learning outcome.Miscellaneous Refers to links or content objects related to

Conference Session

Intersections of Identity and Student Experiences: Equity, Culture & Social Justice Technical Session 10

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jerry Yang, Stanford University; Crystal Nattoo

interested inapplying to Stanford an opportunity to strengthen their graduate school applications and speak toprofessors they may be interested in working with. I got involved in planning both the 2020 and2021 installments of the program – in 2020, it was able to go international for the first time sinceit was entirely virtual due to the pandemic. I think programs like SERGE reduce the intimidationbarrier of applying to Stanford and increase confidence in students who might be experiencingimposter syndrome despite being very accomplished. Helping plan these events made me evenmore sure of my place in building up the next generation

Conference Session

ERM: Design!

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohamed Jalal, University of Ottawa; Hanan Anis, University of Ottawa

each student with a peer rating average score that rangesfrom 0 to 5. The tool generates a report that presents students with anonymous feedback fromtheir peers. Students then use this report in developing an action plan to improve on theirstrengths and weaknesses. A team debrief session is held during one of the lab sessions.Project Ownership Scale:Students’ feelings of intellectual and emotional project ownership were measured using A 16-item Likert style survey was developed based on Hanauer et al. 2-year study (D. I. Hanauer et al.,2012). The survey consists of two subscales: the cognitive ownership subscale, a 10-item five-point scale that assess the degree to which students feel they have intellectual ownership overtheir work & the

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 5: Design and Robotics

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Megan Hammond, University of Indianapolis; Joan Martinez, University of Indianapolis; Elizabeth Ziff

control interface relies on personal experiences, then theindividuals in the room hold great responsibility to cultivate a diverse experience directory.Stereotypes and biases within the design will stem from the designers. The students have crackedthe conversation that users have different experiences and knowledge, but now we need to exposethem to how designing incorporates societal considerations as well.Pilot Conversations: Social Dimension of Design Future/Next StepsA curriculum is being developed by a joint collaboration between the School of Engineering andDepartment of Sociology at our institution to drive the conversation of social and educationalinfluences in human-centered design biases. Our plan is to create a pedagogical tool to

Conference Session

Imagining the Research Agenda for ASEE LEAD

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Meagan Kendall, University of Texas at El Paso; Meg Handley, Pennsylvania State University; Brian Novoselich, United States Military Academy; Matthew Dabkowski

Engineering Education and a Technical Program Chair for the Frontiers in Education Conference 2022.Brian J Novoselich (Lieutenant Colonel) (United States Military Academy) Brian J. Novoselich, Ph.D., P.E., is an active duty army officer, associate professor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, and the director of strategic plans and assessment (G5) for the United States Military Academy (USMA) at West Point. He earned his Ph.D. in engineering education at Virginia Tech in 2016. He holds Master’s and Bachelor’s degrees in mechanical engineering from The University of Texas at Austin and USMA respectively. His research interests include capstone design teaching and assessment, undergraduate engineering student

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathryn Johnson, Colorado School of Mines; Jenifer Blacklock, University of Colorado Boulder; Stephanie Claussen, San Francisco State University; Jon Leydens, Colorado School of Mines; Barbara Moskal, Colorado School of Mines; Janet Tsai, University of Colorado Boulder; Natalie Plata, Colorado School of Mines

’ liminal identities areshaped in both traditional and sociotechnical engineering education settings. We believesociotechnical integration is an important topic for the future of engineering education becauseof its potential to improve engineering practice as well as potential implications for diversity andinclusion at both the student and faculty level. We continue to analyze the very rich data we wereable to collect and plan more publications in the future. For example, we are currently exploringwhat the diverse student perspectives on sociotechnical thinking observed in our focus groupstells about what engineering educators should do, accentuate, or avoid when trying to teach tothat range of perspectives. We would be excited to discuss

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chelsea Lyles, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Lisa McNair, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Thomas Koonce, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Emily Burns, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Annie Patrick, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

transcripts from a series of interviews conducted as part of a podcastseries, Engineering Visibility (https://icat.vt.edu/projects/red/podcast.html). The podcast wascreated to highlight the experiences and voices of students, faculty, staff, and administratorswithin an ECE department that may not have previously been at the forefront of the department.The podcast was planned as a limited series podcast to highlight several identities and concernswithin the ECE department from a departmental climate and culture study. Episodes featuredstudents, alumni, academic advisors, and administrative leaders discussing a variety of topics. Adescription of the episodes from which participants agreed to have their interviews be part of thisresearch study are

Collection

2023 Rocky Mountain Section Conference

Authors

Ben Weihrauch

Conference Session

Cooperative and Experiential Education Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrea Castillo, University of California, Irvine; Brianna McIntyre, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Allison Godwin, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

examined the factors influencing students’ access to work-integratedlearning experiences (WILs; i.e., internships and co-operative education). Several studies haveexamined how WILs enrich students’ academic and career development. Yet, fewer studiesexamine the considerations associated with who participates in WILs and how these types ofexperiences shape students’ beliefs about themselves as engineers or their career plans afterparticipation. This study examines the narratives of 25 students who did and did not participatein WILs to understand why students choose to participate in WILs, the considerations andchallenges to participating in WILs, and the impact of WILs on students’ identity development.This research used an adapted framework of

Conference Session

Community Engagement Division Technical Session 3- Multi- and Inter-disciplinary, Collaboration, and Engagement in Practice

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Justin Meyer; Laura Weiss; Meris Longmeier; Sathya Gopalakrishnan, The Ohio State University; Donnelley Hayde; Mingqi Cai, The Ohio State University

their cohort to develop a “convergent” presentation that leveraged all of the researchers’ expertise in an informal learning setting for adultsFor the cohorts described in this paper (one organized around the theme of Movement and oneorganized around the theme of Elements), the informal learning settings for their individualpresentations, hackathon challenges, and convergent presentations were virtual. However,because these settings had analog counterparts that the project team used prior to the COVID-19pandemic, the planning and execution of the five activities listed above were largely the same forthe researchers. The major changes these cohorts experienced related to accessibilityconsiderations, technical differences in how audiences

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 11

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Glenda T. Kelly, Duke University; Joshua Granek, Duke University; Claudia K. Gunsch, Duke University; Joseph L. Graves Jr., North Carolina A&T State University; David Singleton, Duke University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

Paper ID #40196Advances in Graduate Training in Integrative Bioinformatics forInvestigating and Engineering Microbiomes (IBIEM)Dr. Glenda T. Kelly, Duke University Glenda Kelly is Director of Evaluation and Assessment for the National Science Foundation Engineering Research Center for Precision Microbiome Engineering (PreMiEr), Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University. She previously served as Associate Director for Assessment and Outreach for the Center for the Environmental Implications of NanoTechnology (CEINT), Duke. For both Centers she designed the overall evaluation plan and collaborated with

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kelley E Dugan, University of Michigan; Erika Mosyjowski, University of Michigan; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Conference Session

Inclusive Leadership: A Panel Discussion

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Volpe, University of Florida; Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., University of Florida; Sara Valentina Rojas

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division (LEAD)

development throughout undergraduateprograms in engineering. The 2022-2023 ABET accreditation criteria for engineeringencompasses a need for students to develop technical skills (e.g., basic principles of engineering,science, and mathematics; analyzing and interpreting data; and drawing conclusions based ondata) while simultaneously developing professional and leadership skills (e.g., planning tasks,establishing goals, teamwork, cultivating inclusive environments, leading a team, ethics,responsibility, critical thinking, and thinking about the big picture in terms of economic,environmental, social and global impacts) [2]. There is an increasing demand from theengineering industry and employers for engineers entering the workforce to be equipped