engineering laboratories with accessavailable to all faculty and students, mainly for classroom use. Many electrical/computerengineering leading industries use MATLAB and its toolboxes.Waves on Transmission LinesIn a transmission lines first approach towards teaching electromagnetics, students are first (a) (b) Figure 1: MATLAB movie snapshots taken (a) just before and (b) just after wave is incident on the load. The incident wave is blue and reflected wave is red. Page 15.509.4exposed to wave behavior on transmission lines
4Cultural Dimensions of International Business, 2005, Prentice Hall) are also integrated.G. Hofstede studied questionnaires received from employees at IBM branches across the world and useddata from 40 countries in order to define a suite of national cultural indices (Geert Hofstede, Culturesand Organizations: Software of the Mind, 2010). Hofstede initially defined four bipolar dimensions andlater added an additional two dimensions. According to Hofstede, the four fundamental “mental(software) programs” we assimilate early in life are a function of our cultural environment and consist offour primary cultural dimensions: (1) Power Distance; (2) Individualism; (3) Masculinity; (4)Uncertainty avoidance. The (PDI) reflects how equally power is
Session 1763 An Examination of Vendor-Based Curricula in Higher and Further Education in Western Australia G. Murphy, G. Kohli, D. Veal and S. P. Maj Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, AustraliaAbstractVendor-based curricula are becoming increasingly prevalent in two-year college (Technicaland Further Education (TAFE) courses and in University programs in Western Australia.This reflects a world-wide trend in the provision of such programs; for example, in October2003 Cisco Systems reported that there were over half a million students enrolled in CiscoNetworking Academies in 150
being “hard hat” and highly technical in nature; a perception which is at odds with the realities of the world of engineering practice, where the application of broad knowledge and an understanding of the human dimension of engineering enterprise is required. These realities are not generally reflected by the engineering curricula at Australia universities. In many schools there is an excessive emphasis on highly technical matters in engineering curricula, which excludes not only greater technical diversity but also the skills and knowledge of human affairs necessary in engineering practice. An analysis shows that despite many recommendations in Australia for a greater emphasis on social sciences and humanities in
writing material they had at their disposal. At the time, itmade sense to lecture, as a basic requirement for learning is having access to the knowledge andit was the only way to do so. Since those days, not only has printing technology evolved, but newmedia have emerged; understanding of cognitive processes has progressed, learning theorieshave been developed and tested, new methods and tools have been created. Yet, practices used inmost of our engineering faculties and schools do not reflect this wealth of knowledge.One of these practices concerns the way we go about creating a new course or even a newcurriculum. This paper presents the concept of instructional engineering (IE), in emergence forthe last 40 years in the field of education. The
LLM, like ChatGPT, into educational settings has the potential to enhancemotivation and self-efficacy among students1, but excess use of these resources can yield adverseeffects. Students' cognitive skills rely on their self-efficiency and self-motivation. Studies haveshown that the lower their motivation and self-efficacy to acquire cognitive skills, the higher theiravoidance of tasks. In contrast, those with higher motivation, self-efficacy, and self-motivation arelikely to engage with tasks using their knowledge and expand their borders7. LLMs could restrictstudents from reflecting on their learning process; instead, students might overlook their strengthsand areas for improvement. LLMs could suppress the development of a growth mindset8
recommendations for increasing the quality of teaching. The results of the survey arediscussed.Literature ReviewHigher education, just like any other organization, requires leaders. The most suitable leaders inhigher education tend to be the academics that come up the ranks. Most of these leaders havebackgrounds in research and teaching. Betof [1] argues that leaders as teachers help stimulatelearning and development, strengthens the organizational structure and communications,promotes positive changes, and reduces costs by leveraging top talent. Bowan [2] asserts thatleadership is a key element in meeting the needs of the engineering profession in an era ofheightened global competition. Urbanski et al [3] present the reflections on teachers as
. The questions rangedfrom making a meme to describing a difficult or intuitive concept. Despite the opportunity forextra credit and the unique prompts, the participation rate was only 59% of the possiblesubmissions, and no clear trend was observed between the participation of high- or low-performing students.KeywordsFlipped classroom, active learning, metacognition, reflection.1 IntroductionReflection [1-3] is crucial for fostering metacognition, supporting effective learning, academicsuccess, and lifelong learning beyond college. It is not only about absorbing information but alsoabout actively thinking about one's thinking. By engaging in metacognitive practices, studentscan set learning goals, evaluate their understanding of course material
having information come to them through memory, imagination, theory, andhunches (intuitive); students who prefer receiving information through physical demonstration,figures, and pictures (visual) or through words and mathematical expressions (verbal); studentswho process information actively through hands-on experiences (active) and those who reflect oninformation (reflective); and students who learn in step-by-step logical progression (sequential)and those who get the message all at once without seeing the connections (global). Estes et al.2revealed that traditional lecture-style engineering courses tend to teach toward the intuitive,verbal, reflective, and sequential learner. In contrast, recent work by Felder and Spurlin3 suggeststhat many
between steps,essentially learning in “leaps.” Comics in relation are inherently tailored to sequential learners aseach panel within a comic follows a very specific order for the reader to follow along. Whilst it ispossible to grasp the big picture of a comic, much of the understanding and storytelling aspectsare done through the connections between panels.Sensing learners prefer learning facts and concepts as opposed to intuitive learners who preferabstract relationships and concepts. Finally, active learners prefer application of concepts learnedwhereas reflective learners ponder questions surrounding issues at hand. Essentially, activelearners like very hands-on work whilst reflective learners prefer thinking alone about the problemfirst
resources.In addition to fulfilling the course requirements for the STEM education Ph.D. curriculum, thisseries of meetings helps build community among the students and faculty members. It providesan opportunity to share insights and experiences while having faculty members present to helpguide processes and discussions. A goal is to create a strong foundation of collaboration that willtranscend the course and continue beyond its requirements. As students progress in theirrespective research, this course can provide a venue to continually give back to the program.This paper will provide a reflection on the experience of three STEM education Ph.D. studentswho participated in the redesigned seminar course. STEM education students who participated inthe
involves active teaching pedagogy, which many educators may be unfamiliarwith and hesitant to adopt. The increasing popularity of engineering design courses inundergraduate programs reflects a broader response to industry demands and calls foreducational reform from education and professional organizations [3]-[5].The pedagogical goals of incorporating making and design activities into the curriculum aremultifaceted. These activities aim to enhance problem-solving skills, foster creativity, andencourage teamwork among students. Engineering design courses, particularly senior capstoneprojects, provide students with opportunities to apply their knowledge of the engineering designprocess to create discipline-related artifacts. Freshman design courses
Boomer is a graduate student completing his master’s degree in aerospace engineering at the University of Michigan. His focus in engineering education research has been towards bridging the gap between the undergraduate engineering curriculum and engineering industry practice.Cindy Wheaton, University of MichiganDr. Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan Aaron W. Johnson (he/him) is an Assistant Professor in the Aerospace Engineering Department and a Core Faculty member of the Engineering Education Research Program at the University of Michigan. His lab’s design-based research focuses on how to re-contextualize engineering science engineering courses to better reflect and prepare students for the reality of ill-defined
urgent call to action. To encourage thrive to learn and delve intoaction, a gamified reflective and immersive process would be more sought by learners instead ofreviewing the definition of goals and their description without any tangible practice. To do so, TheYork University SDG Uphold (YU-SDG-UP) app was designed to immerse students into a worldof those scenarios, where their responses are recorded and graded on an impact scale. This providesan interactive approach which is certain to influence the user’s understanding of the SDG, andtheir attitude towards a sustainable, inclusive, diverse, and equitable future. This is accomplishedthrough developing a mobile application hosting a virtual world with a global health score, wherethe user
his memorable adage from around 450 BC: “Tell me, andI will forget. Show me, and I may remember. Involve me, and I will understand.” In more recenttimes, David Kolb defined the concept of Experiential Learning Theory (ELT)2 using twocontinuum axes: active experimentation–reflective observation and abstract conceptualization–concrete experience. The result was a matrix of four learning types: converger (activeexperimentation–abstract conceptualization), accommodator (active experimentation–concreteexperience), assimilator (reflective observation–abstract conceptualization), and diverger(reflective observation–concrete experience). Each of four learning types consists ofexperimentation, experience, or reflection as an active component of the
FROM THE “DATABASE” TO “DATA” COURSES Tatiana Malyuta tmalyuta@citytech.cuny.edu NYC College of Technology 300 Jay Street Brooklyn, NY 11201 Abstract: The paper discusses different roles of data in today’s applications, Information Systems (IS) and the Web, the new approaches and data technologies that support these roles, and the necessity to reflect these issues in the curricula of computer majors. Databases remain the most important topics of data courses, which have to be updated with coverage of the tremendous advances in database technology that
the question categories and relevantthemes were devised. Structural coding aided a thematic analysis of responses (Guest,MacQueen, & Namey, 2011) using the following text segmentations: teacher preparation,educational technologies, and student learning outcomes. Teacher responses have beenanonymized and replaced with a numeric identification code. Rather than provide broadlygeneralizable conclusions, our findings are useful within the decision-making contexts ofcurriculum design and development (Flagg, 2013).FindingsFollowing a teacher workshop and classroom implementation of the E2 curriculum, weadministered an exit survey to participating teachers (n=4). This section summarizes thefindings. First, teacher reflections support the
constructed only of parts that can beeaten. Student teams were formed within each learning community. These teams were taught asimple brainstorming technique, and utilized this technique to generate ideas for how to buildtheir scale. They then built the scale outside of the learning community meeting time, andbrought it to a large group meeting where all groups competed to see which scale could mostaccurately measure a small weight (several grams). Students were asked to reflect on how theirteams function on this task, how they contributed to the team, and how they could improve theirperformance on teams.Another engineering-related activity was to have students consider engineering ethics. Thisactivity was structured as an “academic controversy.” An
water filters were functioning. Theteam explained the process for using presence/absence water tests and recording test results. It was clearthat water quality testing was an extremely unfamiliar process, and the board members had manyquestions. This training meeting was one of the longest, and even after a full day of construction it lastedwell into the evening. However, it was also one of the most important meetings of the trip. Thediscussions that resulted from board member questions produced a collaborative atmosphere in whichthere was little boundary between the project team and the water board.ReflectionThe following is a reflection from Veronica Chouinard (Mechanical Engineering, Tufts ’03) leader “Establishing a water board is
threshold for verifying that an outcome has been achieved (versus in-class discussions which take more time with fewer participants); o discussion boards allow students to “gather their thoughts”, and even facts, before making a comment (versus in-class fumbling and opinionating); o discussion boards allow time for reflection – students reflecting for a few days on what they posted versus what their peers posted (versus what they do and don’t remember from class to class); o instructors have a permanent and easy to review log of the discussion for assessment and their own reflection on (versus an audio or video tape of class).A student’s success in the course meant that the student was successful in
his memorable adage from around 450 BC: “Tell me, andI will forget. Show me, and I may remember. Involve me, and I will understand.” In more recenttimes, David Kolb defined the concept of Experiential Learning Theory (ELT)2 using twocontinuum axes: active experimentation–reflective observation and abstract conceptualization–concrete experience. The result was a matrix of four learning types: converger (activeexperimentation–abstract conceptualization), accommodator (active experimentation–concreteexperience), assimilator (reflective observation–abstract conceptualization), and diverger(reflective observation–concrete experience). Each of four learning types consists ofexperimentation, experience, or reflection as an active component of the
-Briggs Type Indicator (McCaulley, 1990), 2) Kolb learning style model (Kolb, 1984; Stice,1987), 3) Herrman Brain Dominance Model (Herrmann, 1990; Lumsdaine and Lumsdaine,1995), 4) Felder-Silverman learning style model (Felder and Silverman, 1988; Felder, 1993),and 5) Gregorc’s Learning Style Delineator (Gregorc, 1982,1985; Schmidt and Javenkoski.2000).The Felder-Silverman model represents a student learning styles on four scales, eachrepresenting a dimension pertaining to how the students perceive and process information.Students are rated by their preferences to be: (1) active or reflective learners, (2) sensing orintuitive learners, (3) visual or verbal learners, and (4) sequential or global learners. Note thatthese scales do not truly
grade.Thus, it is desirable to develop a method which could be used to more accurately reflect the truecontribution of each student within a group.The instructors tried using several methods to determine the distribution of effort within theteams including merit pay (a form of extra credit based on peer evaluations), team journals(where teams self report the distribution of effort), and computerized team evaluations (e.g.CATME, which won the 2009 Engineering Pathways Premier Software award). All of thesemethods can be used by the instructor to redistribute the group grade based on individual effort.In this research, an automated method of adjusting the group grade is proposed and tested.The new method was developed to adjust grades within each group
the process of learning and how learning isexperience based. By adhering to ELT in instructional design for CAD, GIS and other softwareintensive courses, classroom approaches can be crafted to keep the software in its proper place asa tool. ELT provides a unified context for understanding the relationship between the abstract“hypothesis” and the concrete result of the button pushing. Kolb’s conceptualization of these isshown in Figure 1. Zull refers to the components of Kolb’s ELT as the “four fundamental pillarsof education: gathering, reflecting, creating, and testing. [3]” Irrespective of which instructional design model or process one might prefer, at somepoint learning objectives are defined and then a specific activity is
Practical Wisdom (phronesis) is the integrated virtue, developed through experience and critical reflection, which enables us to perceive, know, desire and act with good sense. This includes discerning, deliberative action in situations where virtues collide. Flourishing Individuals and Society Figure 1: Adapted from The Jubilee Framework of the Building Blocks of Character [15].In the context of engineering education, a few publications have previously leveraged the JubileeFramework [3], [4], [30] – [31]. These character virtues can be mapped to the seven ABETstudent outcomes further clarifying their applicability in engineering (Table 1). Multiple virtuesmay map to multiple ABET outcomes and there is room
end ofthe course. This work-in-progress study explores the range of ways undergraduate studentsattended to sociotechnical dimensions in a first-year engineering computing course, by analyzingwritten reflection responses to readings focused on the racially biased outcomes of a ubiquitousmedical technology, the pulse oximeter. These initial findings add to a growing body of literatureon including sociotechnical topics within undergraduate courses, and will help informpedagogical approaches to support students in developing sociotechnical ways of thinking withinengineering.Conceptual Framework for Developing Sociotechnical LiteracyThis work-in-progress study is focused on a first-year computing course that has been redesignedto incorporate
foundation.Over the course of this project, we have explored the complexities of teaching and learningsociotechnical thinking in three undergraduate classes located in three departments at twouniversities. Two of the classes are design-focused in the first and second years of engineeringcurricula and the third is an upper-division engineering science core course (see details in“Courses”). Our mixed-methods study attempted to measure sociotechnical thinking via a survey([5], [14], [15]). It also used qualitative data from student focus groups, faculty reflection logsand student work to examine the manner in which sociotechnical thinking influences students’development of their identities as engineers [16], explored the interconnection between
engage with students preparing to transfer.In addition, in year 4 program leadership transitioned due to a new role at new university and morestudents support requests of leadership at both the two-year college and the four-year transferuniversity than originally anticipated. This has resulted in reflection on the program administrationand the people and structures that sustain it. This poster will include summaries of scholaractivities, transition in and impact on program leadership, program evaluation results, and researchfindings from the first cohort of students that have transferred and completed a full year at theirnew institution.IntroductionThe Engineering Scholar Program (ESP) project aims to increase the graduation and persistenceof
, many institutions increasedofferings of diversity trainings for faculty and staff. But whether those diversity trainings wereeffective is up for debate, with evidence pointing to some promising initiatives but fewinstitutional changes that disrupt racism [13]–[15] and some well-intentioned trainingsexacerbating the problem of bias [16]. In turn, many campuses moved to embracing student-centered pedagogies. Tools and resources, such as the “Advancing Inclusion and Anti-Racism inthe College Classroom: A rubric and resource guide for instructors” [17] and “Toward anantiracist engineering classroom for 2020 and beyond: A starter kit,” [18] were developed to helpfaculty reflect on their identity and positionality, consider their students’ lived
. Thisdata suggests that topics students spent more hands-on time with resulted in better performance.IntroductionAccording to the Bureau of Labor and Statistics, the average person has 10 jobs by the age of 40[1]. This can be seen in Engineering and also reflected in what Engineering graduates are doingfive and ten years post degree[2], [3] . Further, nearly 25% of the Best Performing CEOs startedwith a B.S. in Engineering [4]. Industry continues to ask for more well-rounded competencies ofnew Engineers. The T-shaped engineer combines a depth of engineering technical knowledgewith broad knowledge across domains such as business, communications, entrepreneurship, andethics [2], [5]. Fostering 21st century skills ensures Engineers are equipped to