than moving on without addressing knowledge gaps. ● Developing and instructing additional training in active learning teaching methods for departmental teaching assistants, initially as a discrete course, and then incorporated as a mandatory training courses for student employees in Bioengineering. ● Using ‘scaffolding’, using instructional plans to lead the students from what they already know, such as using prompts, questioning, or cue cards [33], to form a deeper understanding of new material [34] with a fading level of instructor support. ● Implementing ‘exit tickets’, an end of class short task to reflect on learning, such as students noting what was most valuable, and what they are still confused
sectors to implement sustainability as part of building plan- ning, design, construction, and operations. As a LEED Accredited Professional, Annie brings the latest in green building methods, technologies, and best practices to the classroom. Her specific areas of interest include metrics of sustainability for built facilities, green building materials and systems, cost modeling to support sustainability implementation, and in situ performance of sustainable facility technologies.Dr. Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., University of Florida Denise R. Simmons, Ph.D., PE, LEED-AP, is an associate professor in the Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering in the Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering at the University of Florida
3Table 1Participant Demographic Information Pseudonym Race/Ethnicity PhD Completion Status Degree Field Becky European American/White Completed Engineering Giselle Hispanic/LatinX Did not complete Biological Sciences Tiara Black/African American, Completed Mathematics European American/White Angela Black/African American Did not complete Engineering Erin European American/White Did not complete Physical Sciences Nadia European American/White Did not complete EngineeringAnalysis Plans A constant-comparative
and Their Impacts on StudentsA growing strand of scholarly dialogue in higher education explores connections betweenstudents’ emotional experiences with pressures and stress, and student achievement andretention. Relevant studies identify general academic pressures including parental expectations,grades, test taking, time pressures, and future plans [19] as well as those unique to engineeringstudents, such as family pressure to study the major [20]. Some studies specifically focus onstudent stress [21, 22] and impacts on students’ mental health [19, 23].Students often experience anxiety due to the stress of these expectations as well as fear of failureto fulfill them [24]. In the context of a study of psychological distress in college
. The time dedicatedto the Lecture Style (LS) approach during the semester was 815 minutes (43.3%), CollaborativeLearning (CL) 443 minutes (23.6%), Gamification (GA) 155 (8.3%), Problem-Based Learning(PBL) 310 (16.5%) and Social Interaction (SI) 152 (8.1%). The class times in the table werecomputed based on the number of slides presented during class, the lesson plan for each class andthe class sessions dedicated to discussing the project and solving in-class problems. LS consistedmainly of the instructor presenting the basic concepts underlying specific topics in each course.For example, a basic concept in each of the classes is as follows: SE1 - the process of performingrequirements elicitation; and FST - the approach used to generate test
into reauthoring what it means to be an engineer in thecontext of a first-year engineering design course. We begin by describing the institutionalcontext of the course.Context of First-Year Engineering Design CourseThe course that occupies the focus of the present paper is known locally as Introduction toEngineering and is offered in the fall semester at Harding—a private, non-profit, religiouslyaffiliated, teaching-focused university. It is a required course in the degree plans for fiveengineering majors that are offered at the university: biomedical, civil, computer, electrical, andmechanical. Typically, students are enrolled in the first-year engineering design course in theirfirst year of undergraduate. Almost all of the enrolled students
findingsfrom previous work with GE students, in particular a study conducted by Hutchison-Green et al.[2] Using data collected from the NSF funded project “A Mixed-Methods Study of the Effects ofFirst-Year Project Pedagogies on the Retention and Career Plans of Women in Engineering,” [5],[6] this secondary analysis of data was conducted to answer the research question, How doengineering students from a declared first-year matriculation structure develop engineering self-efficacy, through first-level and pattern coding methods [7].Perceptions of self-efficacy are formed by four sources: mastery experience, vicarious experience,social persuasions, and somatic and emotional state [8]. The most influential of these sources ismastery experience – the
profession thataffects every aspect of modern life [1]. Reinforcing this sense of responsibility throughout thecurriculum helps increase students’ awareness and judgment, which supports their ethicaldecision-making in practice [33]. One student in Fluid Mechanics noted that the intervention“show[ed] how broad of an impact the technology we might be working on in the future canhave on the country and the world sometimes.” The hydraulic fracturing activity helped thisstudent understand the potential implications of his future career and this was an importantoutcome since he planned to pursue employment in the oil industry.The narrow technical focus of individual courses in the engineering curriculum can obscureconnections between, and implications of
. Dr. Loshbaugh taught in CSM's EPICS program, for which she developed extensive course and faculty-support materials, and designed and implemented a leadership course and overseas summer field session. She has recently been appointed to develop a diversity plan for CSM, and has experience in international education, corporate training and coaching, and academic editing.Brittany Claar, Colorado School of Mines Heidi G. Loshbaugh is an Assistant Research Professor in the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education at Colorado School of Mines. She is also the Associate Director for CSM's Center for Engineering Education. Within the CAEE, Dr. Loshbaugh has been responsible for
arerelatively difficult teaching goals. This paper proposes that it may be possible toaccomplish these goals by combining the use of traditional lectures with active andcollaborative learning and with the Socratic Method of directive questioning/reasoning,in which the instructor poses a problem and asks a series of directive, probing questions,to help students follow a particular approach to solving the problem.The directed questions contain useful information to assist students in (a) understandingthe problem, (b) devising a plan to solve the problem, (c) carrying out the plan, and,finally, (d) reviewing/extending the problem. In the last step [step (d)], students areencouraged to reflect and look back at the implications of the problem solution, what
12.900.10hour or so of operation, when the pool temperature is close to the containment air temperature.During this period, the simulation matches the experimental data almost exactly (especially whenthe small losses in the primary loop are treated), and the result is independent of the heat transfercoefficient used during the simulation. For longer run times, however, using the correct heattransfer coefficient is essential as shown in Fig. 8. Unfortunately, experimental data were notavailable for comparison here since the actual pool is not usually allowed to get much above atemperature of 95 F. However, plans are currently underway to modify plant conditionssomewhat so that a more significant surface loss component can be measured with reasonablepool
within engineeringeducation, with a strong emphasis on ecological as well as economic sustainability. For exampleParsons16 was engaged in developing a handbook for U.S. engineering students planning to workin developing countries. Emphasis was placed on listening to the community. For a review ofappropriate technology courses that involve a service learning component see Sandekian et al.17A strong model for service learning and appropriate technology is the ETHOS program at theUniversity of Dayton. The program connects students with service learning opportunities indeveloping countries, and offers a course which includes language and cultural preparation aswell as readings in appropriate technology to prepare students.18 Explicit recognition is
. Approaches to Materials Science learning Materials science and engineering has grown considerably from its roots in experimentalmetallurgy and, recently, the main research breakthroughs have been driven by advances incomputational methods32. Thornton and Asta32 recently conducted a comprehensive survey about the state ofcomputational Materials Science in undergraduate and graduate courses at the 20 leadingprograms in the United States. While many universities are creating or planning to createComputational Materials Science courses, one striking conclusion from their work is that theprevailing mindset in most of those institutions is that one should learn modeling after learningthe science. In other words, computer modeling is regarded
11.1046.16 ‚ Introduction of braces at each story ‚ Introduction of base isolation systemSystem and Loading Definition:A typical elevation and floor plan are shown in Figures 1 and 2 respectively. You are onlyinterested in the performance of the structure in the North-South direction.Member Sizes Columns: North/South Story Section I (in4) 1st W14x159 1900 2nd W14x132 1530 3rd W14x132
professional growth and innovativepractices for Indiana teachers. We envision facilitating a “community of practice” (CoP) thatextends across the state, helping teachers from one end of Indiana to the other to share ideas,collaborate on projects, disseminate best practices, and network expertise.Our CoP features go beyond threaded discussion “forums” or asynchronous “chat rooms.” Forexample, groups of teachers working on a project can reserve their own PRISM “meeting room”– either short- or long-term. Within this private web-workspace, members can set meeting times,post agendas, update calendars, collect data, vote on issues, use a shared whiteboard, and storematerials. We welcome planning committees from within school districts or across
: "It's a skill thateveryone has to learn. How to get things done through others." As participants commented onthis part of their development, they listed skills and experience of: supervision, working withothers to coordinate tasks, motivating others, encouraging others, working to solve colleague'spersonal problems, personnel development. Each participant identified human relation skills andhuman interaction skills being expanded during the transition from a formal education world totheir professional career. There was no difference between technical and general managementparticipants in their responses concerning people skills.Project Management. Within this category, the various skills of scheduling, directing, planning,budgeting, organizing
carefully plantheir courses. A male student (IE, upper division) commented, “Plan out your entire collegecareer… You need to take it and figure out if it is do-able…”Aspects of this advice include beingaware of intermittent course offerings, seeking professor and course recommendations fromupper division students in the major, taking courses at a local community college, and payingcareful attention to discipline-specific foundational courses. Get course advising very early and an idea of recurrence very early. One of the reasons it took me five years, one issue is because I was out of the rotation for the course schedule so I had to wait for these courses to come around so I just take other fillers at a time. (male, ECE
principles that the students are expected to learn and use for mapping theserelationships and assessment results. A House of Quality (HOQ) format [20] is used to keeptrack of industry, ABET, institution, program and course goals (Figure 2). The House of Qualityis a design tool used by industry to create a conceptual map of customer and engineeringrequirements and is used for planning and communication. In the Design Clinic, the HOQmatrix is used to illustrate the relationship between and across learning outcomes, trackassessments, identify areas for improvement, and create action plans.As a general rule, the definitions become more specific as you move from left to right. Forexample, cultural objectives are the important— and often undisclosed
(Question 4). A separate study is planned for freshman to be executedduring the fall 2013 semester. Students were asked about their parents’ educational achievementlevel and results are shown in Figure 2 (Question 5). 40% Percentage of Participatats 30% 20% 10% 0% My mother and father At least one of my One of my parents is a Both of my parents are have never attended parents attended college graduate. college graduates. college. college, but
about where they come from, what their plans and Help answer their questions helping them achieve them” (factors that help) students “As far as MEAs, there is a huge dis-connect from a classroom” (factors that Help regarding MEAs hinder) Page 23.588.5IV. ResultsIn this section, the first results reported are the frequencies of times that G/UTAs discuss theirvarious responsibilities along with their general perceptions of their positions. The three maintopics that both GTAs and UTAs discussed are training, grading, and helping students
rapid progress in renewable energyutilization, there is a great need for trained professionals with adequate knowledge in this area tobe able to plan, design and operate RES systems, and perform analytic evaluation of their impacton power systems to which they are connected1-5. On the other hand, electric power systems,electric transmission and distribution systems are undergoing rapid changes due to deregulation,the penetration of dispersed and distributed energy resources (DER), renewable energygeneration and power electronics technologies, and the adoption of efficient computation,communications and control mechanisms. Due to these facts together with the interest of keepingstudents abreast of the current scientific and technological
, andbecause high school Computer Science programs are on a decline, a significant time wasspent to help the participants create an action plan to incorporate computational thinking intheir respective school. The K-12 educators need to be exposed to the excitement and power Page 23.812.6of computer science and computational thinking. There were goals established in order toachieve this. The first goal was for the teachers, administrators, and students to understand thediscipline computer science. The second goal was to promote K-12 computing curriculum.The third goal was to encourage the teachers to incorporate the computational thinkingconcepts into
. Page 23.828.4DescriptionThe course used in this study is Control Systems in the Mechanical Engineering program. TheControl Systems course is taught over 10-weeks as a four-credit quarter-long course required ofall senior mechanical engineering majors and is the students’ first exposure to control systemsconcepts in the curriculum. Prerequisite courses include Dynamic Systems and NumericalMethods. The course covers traditional controls topics including root locus, Bode plots, Nyquistplots, PID and lead/lag controller, see Table 1. Table 1. Control System Course Content (Planned)Topic DescriptionLadder Logic Design of simple discrete control logic using
about the purpose of supplemental material given? Questions · Did the participants clarify what questions they were supposed to answer? · Did the participants have a plan of action to answer the questions that they identified? Points of View · Did the participants ask whether there were other relevant viewpoints that should be considered? · Did the participants ask about the viewpoints expressed in
thecommissions are “enabled and appointed by the Board.” ASCE was unconvinced by thisargument, because the issue at hand was about establishing policies and procedures, notconducting accreditation activities.At the meeting, ASCE’s Board members went forward with their two planned motions regardingapproval authority for the APPM, and both were approved. From ASCE’s perspective, thisdecision affirmed the Board’s sole responsibility for approving ABET policies and procedures.Program NamingWithout question, the most complex and controversial accreditation policy issue faced by theASCE task committee has been program naming. At the heart of this issue is paragraphII.E.4.c.(2) of the APPM: “If a program name implies specialization(s) for which ProgramCriteria
areevaluated by some form of a final report. In the traditional civil engineering curriculum, undergraduate students take courses withboth lecture and laboratory formats. While the lecture courses provide the opportunity forstudents to absorb new information, the purpose of a laboratory is to expose students to thephysical problems associated with a course and reinforce course content. The traditional type oflaboratory has well-planned experiments, typically containing step-by-step guides leading thestudents through each experiment. Generally in groups of four or five, students in-turn conductthe experiment, regurgitate the results, and prepare a laboratory report, arguably fulfilling ABETstudent outcome (b) “an ability to design and conduct
Skill Building Academic Advising √ graduate from middle Research Planning/ Summer Academic Enrichment √ school with algebra 1 Initiation successfully completed. Tutoring
technologyto commercial publishers and via professional societies.Regarding the need for professional development, the report “Use of Technology to StrengthenK-12 Education in the United States”28 states that the substantial investment in hardware,software and infrastucture recommended by the Panel would be wasted if K-12 teachers are notprovided with the preparation and support they need to effectively integrate informationtechnologies into their teaching. The Panel also believes that the teachers should be provided notonly with ongoing mentoring and consultative support but also with the time required tofamiliarize themselves with available software and content, to incorporate technology into theirlesson plans, and to discuss technology use with
currently works as a Research Associate and Deputy Director at the Murdough Center for Engineering Professionalism (MCEP) and National Institute for Engineering Ethics (NIEE) at Texas Tech University. He oversees the day to day operations of the center’s distance learning courses for both engineering students and practicing engineers. Additionally, he provides lectures on ethical theory and other topics in an on-campus engineering ethics course. Burgess was also a member of the Ethics in the Curriculum Task Force for Texas Tech’s Quality Enhancement Plan. The Quality Enhancement Plan was a crucial component of Texas Tech’s accreditation with the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools. A theme throughout these roles