]. [cited 2014 Dec 1]. Available from: http://www.ni.com/ultiboard/5. Welcome to Ohio Art | Ohio Art [Internet]. [cited 2015 Jan 31]. Available from: http://www.ohioart.com/6. RS-485 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia [Internet]. [cited 2014 Dec 1]. Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RS-4857. NI myRIO - National Instruments [Internet]. [cited 2014 Jan 4]. Available from: http://www.ni.com/myrio/8. iRobot: iRobot Create® Programmable Robot [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 12]. Available from: http://store.irobot.com/education-research-robots/irobot-create-programmable- robot/family.jsp?categoryId=2591511&s=A-ProductAge&gclid=CLr78f_Fo8QCFeXm7AodZjsA3g9. Adafruit RGB Matrix HAT + RTC for Raspberry Pi - Mini Kit
national anthem, or political campaign songs showing solidarity with a particular candidate. Withthe extension of the cultural identity of particular songs and the association of genres withbehaviors,24 the links between personality, values, and grouping behavior related to musicalpreference suggest that there may be a relationship between musical preference and majorchoice. The perceived cultural differences between engineering disciplines25 and the factors ofpersonal interest and social pressures on engineering discipline choice26 may also extend thisrelationship towards the choice of an engineering discipline. Therefore, we explore whether apreference for a particular musical genre(s) correlates with the selection of a particularengineering
this point no concluding remarks can be shared. The expectation is that the quantitative datacollection allows comparative insight into students’ perception of their abilities and skills prior tostarting the course and after completion of the course. Data derived from the quality assessmentof sketch exercises will reflect students’ actual performance. The conclusion will demonstrate ifstudents’ perception of their abilities and their actual performance are in correlation.Bibliographic Information 1. Trolian, T. L., & Fouts, K. S. (2011). No Child Left Behind: Implications for college student learning. About Campus, 16(3), 2-7. doi:10.1002/abc.20061
-65 Crocker, S. and King, R.C., (Eds), Piping Handbook, 5th edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967
exercises developed and implemented in this project. Further details about our evaluation methods and results can be found in the ASEE 2016 paper entitled ‘ Enhancing Student Cognition and Affect through the Creative Art of Structural and Civil Engineering ’ [9]. Figure 7: Survey results pertaining to interactive teaching methods Acknowledgements This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant no.: 1432426. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National
presented (Figure 1). The lecturer leads the students towards adiscussion around the different shapes of the vehicles. Soon the students discover the problem oftipping over backwards if there is too much power driving the rear wheels. So, how is the topfuel dragster stable? A simple force balance shows the students the point of the long nose of thedragster is to stabilize it as it applies its large torque to the wheels and accelerates. Torque,which had previously been applied to only abstract and obscure systems now answers a specificand visible question in the students’ minds. Figure 1: Comparison of power, weight, and 1-100mph speed for a Porsche 911 Turbo S and a Top Fuel Dragster, all parameters via WikipediaGearhead
, including biomaterials. She was awarded the 2012 ASEE NCS Outstanding Teacher Award, 2013 Gannon University Distinguished Faculty Award and 2013-2014 Gannon University Faculty Award for Excellence in Service-Learning. Vernaza does research in the area of alternative fuels (biodiesel), engineering education (active learning techniques), and high-strain deformation of materials. She is currently the PI of an NSF S-STEM and ADVANCE-PAID grants.Dr. Davide Piovesan, Gannon University Davide Piovesan was born in Venice, Italy on October 10 , 1978. He is currently Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering department at Gannon University and the director of the Biomedical Engi- neering Program. He received his M.S.M.E in
volunteers. We hope tobuild the university’s confidence in our work and create partnerships with departments across thecampus. In fact, other universities have experimented with different funding models includingusing tuition from Capstone Design courses and requiring student fees for use of the space.5Design thinking is an iterative process; as time passes, we hope to get the opportunity to build abigger and better space for the students. This has been an experiment in student engagement, andwe are proud to be a part of it.Bibliography 1. Kurti, S., Kurti, D.L., & Fleming, L (2014). The Philosophy of Educational Makerspaces. Teacher Librarian. 41.5, 8-11. 26 Jan. 2016. 2. Forest, R., Moore, R., Jariwala, A., et.al. (2014). “The
will be available to present at the conference. Additionally, the principal of the high school that is involved with this program has agreedto provide SAT/ACT scores and future graduation data (e.g., college major) of the participants aswell as of non-participant classes. This information will be used to measure the effectiveness ofthe program as well as the improvement year-to-year and the improvement cohort-to-cohort.References1 H. E. Dudeney and M. H. Dudeney, Puzzles and curious problems. T. Nelson and sons, ltd., 1932.2 A. B. Adcock, E. D. Demaine, M. L. Demaine, M. P. O’Brien, Reidl, F. S. Villaamil, and B. D. Sullivan, “Zig-Zag Numberlink is NP-Complete,” Journal of Information Processing, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 239–245
programming and video processing require SDK, a system that manages the buildprocess in an operating system, and supporting library integration knowledge. This requirescomputer science skills and a timeline that is beyond the scope of middle school curriculum. Thedevelopment of the vision portion of robot perception research should be implemented at seniorhigh school or college level. This process requires more than 6 weeks of research work in a K-12classroom scenario.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the Research Experiences for Teachers Programunder National Science Foundation Grant No. 1300779. Any opinions, finding, and conclusionsor recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not
Paper ID #16068Improving Scientific Writing Capability in an Undergraduate Population Us-ing a Fading Paradigm Scaffolding ApproachAmelia Spencer Lanier, University of Delaware Ameila S. Lanier is a Ph.D. candidate in the Biomechanics & Movement Science department at the Uni- versity of Delaware. She received her M.S. (2012) also in Biomechanics & Movement from the University of Delaware. She recieved her B.S. (2009) in Biomedical Engineering from Washington State University.Ashutosh Khandha, University of Delaware Ashutosh Khandha is a Ph.D. candidate in the Biomedical Engineering program at the University of
. Shelley, M. W. (2008). Frankenstein, Or, The Modern Prometheus 1818. Engage Books.2. Jordan, S. & Lande, M. (2016). Additive Innovation: Radical Collaboration in Design Thinking and Making. International Journal of Engineering Education. 32-2. May/June.3. Maker Education Initiative (n.d.). Maker Ed Resource Library. Retrieved February 1, 2016 from http://makered.org/resources/.4. The Tinkering Studio at the Exploratorium (n.d.). Scribbling Machines. Retrieved February 1, 2016 from http://tinkering.exploratorium.edu/scribbling-machines.5. Beard, B. (2016). Teaching Bioethics with Pool Noodles. Retrieved from: https://medium.com/imaginary-papers/teaching-bioethics-with-pool-noodles- ec9723baeea8#.jk87xmyyz.6. Louridas, P. (1999
engineering education-related awards, and type(s) of contributions to the field.Ultimately, 47 people were interviewed, with an emphasis on pioneers who were near retirementor had already retired. Resources limited the number of pioneers who could be interviewed andprofiled. Further, not all invited pioneers were interested or able to participate. We acknowledgethat this is just a sample of the many people who have substantially contributed to engineeringeducation and hope that this work can be expanded to include more of them.Data analysisAll 47 interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. Using qualitative analysis software(ATLAS.ti), the transcripts were coded for the contributions and impacts reported by thepioneers, drawing primarily on
greater impact in the continuous improvement efforts.References[1] Sirinterlikci, A., & Kerzmann, T. L. (2013, June), Contributions of a Mandatory Internship Course to anEngineering Curriculum Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta, Georgia.[2] Ntafos, S., & Hasenhuttl, M. (2015, June), Internships, Other Employment, and Academics Paper presented at2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, Washington.[3] Miller, M. H. (1998, June), Industry Internships as a Tool for Curriculum Development Paper presented at 1998Annual Conference, Seattle, Washington.[4] Unpublished ABET Self-Study Report, 2015.[5] http://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/E001-15-16-EAC-Criteria-03-10-15.pdf
calculating structures." Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education & Practice 139.3 244-247.6. Hsieh, S. J. (2003). “Animations and intelligent tutoring systems for programmable logic controller education.” Int. J. Eng. Educ., 19(2), 282–296.7. Cuadra, C. (2010). “Challenges in building structure engineering education.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Education and Educational Technology, World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society, Stevens Point, WI, 123–125.8. Planchard D. & M., (2013) “Engineering Design with SolidWorks”, Schroff Development Corporation.9. Valentino J., and DiZinno N., (2011) “SolidWorks for Technology and Engineering”, Industrial Press, Inc.
, "The house of quality", Harvard Business Review Vol. 66, No. 3, 1988, pp. 63-74.7. Govers, C.P.M., “What and how about quality function deployment (QFD)”, Int. J. Production Economics Vol. 46–47, 1993, pp. 575–585.8. Parker, P.E., P.D. Fleming, S. Beyerlein, D. Apple, and K. Krumsieg, “Differentiating assessment from evaluation as continuous improvement tools,” 31st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 10-13, Reno, NV, 2001.
March 2016].[5] Phoenix Contact, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.phoenixcontact.com/nanoline. [Accessed 31 January 2016].[6] Phoenix Contact, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.phoenixcontact.com/online/portal/us. [Accessed 31 January 2016].[7] J. Payne, "Future of the PLC," CFE Media, 26 August 2014. [Online]. Available: http://www.controleng.com/single-article/future-of-the-plc/a5e0a692be5b5a2f93dbe38215f770d1.html. [Accessed 7 March 2016].[8] A. R. Harriger, B. C. Harriger, M. G. Flynn and S. M. Flynn, "Attracting Minorities to ET through TECHFIT," in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA, 2015.[9] TECHFIT, "TECHFIT Testimonials," January 2016. [Online]. Available: http://techfit.tech.purdue.edu
thestudents cooperated to learn how the best conduct the experiment.3. Incremental and continual improvement: Each of the five pilots in his/her class section wasgiven the opportunity to fly the drone for at least two trials. The pilots increased their flyingspeed average from 4.3 ft/s to 4.7 ft/s from the first to the second trial. Furthermore, the standarddeviation of the time recorded decreased from 2.4 seconds to 1.2 seconds, showing incrementalimprovement of accuracy. This can be attributed to both a refinement of piloting skills and betteraccuracy of time data collection by paying closer attention to starting and stopping the watch.Those who observed the experiment and sought out error sources continually improved byidentifying patterns
solid model initially provided by the OEM (which wasmade purposefully deficient to illustrate the effect of poor modeling) and incorrectly predicted thefailed component(s). The next instructional phase was in experimental setup, nondestructivemeasurement techniques, data acquisition systems, and analysis of experimental data. This led tostudents running destructive experiments on real OEM assemblies in the lab, and discovering thattheir predictions did not match reality. We took advantage of the teaching opportunity to illustratethe effect of problem setup in meshing the solid models; students corrected and optimized theirmodel and were able to correctly predict the failed component. This exactly mirrors what happensin the OEM’s own labs.The
future?; and (2) Make asuggestion(s) for improving the course (a criticism alone is not helpful; tell your instructor howyou would fix any problem).ProcedureData from the course evaluations were collected once each semester had ended. Students in theFall 2013 course participated in the traditional version of the course while those in the Fall 2014and Spring 2015 courses participated in the flipped version. There were no differences in GPA,age, or gender between students in the traditional versus flipped courses. However, students inthe flipped sections had slightly more International students.Quantitative resultsAnalyses were run to test whether differences existed between a traditional versus flipped courseon student performance, course
Studies Vol. 17, No. 4, 2006, pp. 363-383.[2] Diefes-Dux, H.A., J.S. Zawojewski, M.A. Hjalmarson, and M.E. Cardella," A framework for analyzing feedback in a formative assessment system for mathematical modeling problems", Journal of Engineering Education Vol. 101, No. 2, 2012, pp. 375-406.[3] Jansson , D.G., and S.M. Smith," Design Fixation", Design Studies Vol. 12, No. 1, 1991, pp. 3- 11.[4] Dym C. L., Agogino A. M., Eris O., D.D. Frey, and L. Leifer," Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning", Journal of Engineering Education Vol. 94, No. 1, 2005, pp. 103-120.[5] Atman, C.J., R.S. Adams, M.E. Cardella, J. Turns, S. Mosborg, and J. Saleem," Engineering Design Processes: A Comparison of
cards. The program sent all thecards together in a package ahead of the riders, so they would receive them when they stoppedfor lodging.Social media interactions between BME CUReS REU participants and current Texas 4000 ridersThe Texas 4000 students on the bike ride post photos and notes to the Texas 4000’s websitethrough a social media aggregator. Similarly, the BME CUReS REU participants post to theREU program’s website through a blog with photos and commentary. Blog post content variesfrom reflections on research and the impact of cancer, to letters to the Texas 4000 student riders,to fun photos from local social trips. The program shares this blog and relevant postings with theTexas 4000 throughout the 10 weeks.Adoption of Texas 4000
, 284-289.[5] Feisal, L. D. and Rosa, A. J. (2005) The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education 94(1), p121-130.[6] Gibben, P., Medagoda, E and Dumble, S. (2009) Enhancement of learning in aircraft handling qualities through variable stability flight simulation. Proceedings of the 2009 AaeE Conference, Adelaide.[7] Harrap, M. J. (2007). An Airborne Laboratory for Undergraduate and Postgraduate Education, Proceedings of the 2007 AaeE Conference, Melbourne.[8] Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E., and Mainemelis, C. (2000). Experiential learning theory: previous research and new directions in R. J. Sternberg and L. F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on cognition, learnig and thinking styles
remain, as do other questions about effective implementation strategies. Following thepattern of this work in progress, we offer two illustrative research questions: How should the function of faculty development be addressed at different institutional levels, e.g., departmental, college, institutional, national, and international? How are faculty engagement with and responses to formal faculty development initiatives characterized, and how might these characteristics, patterns, etc. inform future faculty development initiatives?Bibliographic Information1. Freeman, S., et al., Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. PNAS, Proceedings of the National
of Louisville Dr. Patricia A. S. Ralston is Professor and Chair of the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the University of Louisville. She received her B.S., MEng, and PhD degrees in chemical engineering from the University of Louisville. Dr. Ralston teaches undergraduate engineering mathematics and is currently involved in educational research on the effective use of technology in engineering education, the incorpo- ration of critical thinking in undergraduate engineering education, and retention of engineering students. She leads a research group whose goal is to foster active interdisciplinary research which investigates learning and motivation and whose findings will inform the development of
/showAward?AWD_ID=1449489Cech, E. (2014). Culture of Disengagement in Engineering Education. Science, Technology & Human Values, 39(1), 42-72.Cech, E. A. (2010). Trained to Disengage? A Longitudinal Study of Social Consciousness and Public Engagement Among Engineering Students. American Society for Engineering Education.Cruz, J., & Frey, W. (2003). An Effective Strategy for Integrating Ethics Across the Curriculum in Engineering: An ABET 2000 Challenge. Science and Engineering Ethics, 9, 543-568.Deneulin, S. (2014). Wellbeing, Justice and Development Ethics. New York and London: Taylor and Francis.Dunlap, J. C. (2005). Changes in students' use of lifelong learning skills during a problem
, “Transformation of a College: From Teaching to Learning,” Presidency, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 28-31,Fall 2004. [Online]. Available: ERIC Institute of Education Sciences: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ796173. [AccessedJan. 31, 2018].[5] S. Dorado, “Institutional Entrepreneurship, Partaking, and Convening,” Organization Studies, vol. 26, issue 3,2005, pp. 385-414. . [Online]. Available: Sage journals: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0170840605050873. [AccessedJan. 31, 2018].[6] A.F. Sherwani, et al., “Life cycle assessment of solar PV based electricity generation systems: A review,”Elsevier: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 14, issue 1, January 2010, pp. 540-4.[7] V.V. Tyagi, et al., “Progress in Solar PV Technology: research and Achievement,” Elsevier
education.In Proceedings of the international convention of the association for educational communicationsand technology (pp. 430-441).[3] E. Engstrom. “Schoolhouse rock: cartoons as education.” Journal of Popular Film andTelevision. vol. 23 (3), pp. 98-104, 1995.[4] Hsin, W. J., & Cigas, J. “Short videos improve student learning in online education.” Journalof Computing Sciences in Colleges. Vol. 28(5), pp. 253-259. 2013.[5] M. Huang and K. Gramoll. Online interactive multimedia for engineering thermodynamics.In ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, June, 2004, Salt Lake City, UT.[6] S. Brown, C. Nicholas, and M. Kyte. “Evaluating the effectiveness of dynamic trafficanimations: Case study in transportation engineering education.” Journal of
. 2013.3. N. Dimitrov, K. Meadows, E. Kustra, T. Ackerson, L. Prada, N. Baker, P. Boulos, G. McIntyre, and M.K. Potter, “Assessing graduate teaching development programs for impact on future faculty.” Toronto: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario, 2013.4. T. Pinder-Grover, S. Kusano, and G. Agresar, “Work in Progress: Engineering Student Instructors, What Are Their Needs and How Can We Best Prepare Them?,” presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah., June 2018, Paper ID #23779.5. L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press, 1978.6. (n. d.). “Overview of Inclusive Teaching at Michigan.” http://crlt.umich.edu/overview-inclusive-teaching-michigan