nanotechnology fabrication. The virtual SEMis located in a room designated for measurement which also includes a virtual light microscope.Other rooms include a photolithography room, an etching room, and a room for thin filmdeposition. This paper focuses on the SEM module of the VR project.2.0 RationalThe goal of the SEM module is to enable students to become familiar with the features,capabilities, and controls of the SEM in a cost effective, safe, and interactive environment, priorto, or in the place of, using a real SEM. Benefits of using the VR SEM are listed below.Cost effectiveThe VR SEM can negate costs associated with SEM education in the following ways: • Reduces the high energy and material costs of running the SEM continually during
used to troubleshoot the fictitious Arduino blink exercise while he actively modeled his troubleshooting procedure to the unique problem students approached him with. Most of these instructional interventions had durations of under ten minutes and frequently occurred after students attempted to solve the problem on their own for some period of time. These interactions occurred throughout the entirety of the prototyping process with no obvious phase of the project where these episodes were most frequent. With that said, these episodes most often revolved around electronics and programming faults. In our observations, Holmes put in considerable effort to be prepared to help students with the flaws they would likely encounter within
efforts on Mathematics Socialization and identity amongst pre-service elementary teachers, an effort at understanding the reasons for lack of interest in the subject with a view to proffer solution and engender/motivate interest amongst this group that will eventually reflect in their classroom practices. She is currently a Graduate Assistant with UIC Engage, a commu- nity focused project that provides help for less-privileged students from K-8 in mathematics, reading and writing. She continues to work as a substitute teacher occasionally to keep abreast with current practices within the school system. Her work as a Research Assistant for the BEST program has turned out to be one of her best experiences as a
mathematics; however, underrepresentationof African Americans and Hispanics in mathematics persists (10) (11). Gender variation has beenmarked in computing baccalaureate and doctorate attainment and employment with minorities showingeven greater disparities (12).Recognizing the workforce and diversity needs and the importance of apprenticeship internshipexperiences (13), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) Computing Sciences and SustainableHorizons Institute (SHI) partnered in a project aimed at building sustainable pathways that promoteresearch partnerships leading to an increase in the breadth and quality of the Computing Sciencesworkforce. LBNL recognizes the need to nurture a strong and diverse workforce and foster inclusionaryand inter
persistence rates. Ms. Boyd received her B.S. in Engineering Science from the University of Virginia in 2014.Miss Raeven Carmelita WatersMiss Yasmine Yunus Sikder,Ms. Ashley R Taylor, Virginia Tech Ashley Taylor is a doctoral candidate in engineering education at Virginia Polytechnic and State Univer- sity, where she also serves as a program assistant for the Center for Enhancement of Engineering Diversity and an advisor for international senior design projects in the Department of Mechanical Engineering. Ash- ley received her MS in Mechanical Engineering, MPH in Public Health Education, and BS in Mechanical Engineering from Virginia Tech. Her research interests include access to higher education, broadening participation
Engineering Fundamentals Outcomes ASCE05 Materials Science ASCE06 Engineering Mechanics ASCE07 Experimental Methods and Data Analysis ASCE08 Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Technical Outcomes ASCE09 Project Management ASCE10 Engineering Economics ASCE11 Risk and Uncertainty ASCE12 Breadth in Civil Engineering Areas ASCE13 Design
interest students to attend graduate school afterdegree completion. REU participants are matched with a Primary Investigator (PI) and GraduateMentor as well as a project based on students’ interests.To produce Engineers of 2020, this REU Program integrated aspirations of the National Societyof Engineers from the early 2000s. The select stated objectives were to “produce engineers withtechnical competence and a broader array of professional skills,” improve “retention of studentsand broader participation of women and [underrepresented] minorities” (URM), enable smoothtransitions between community colleges and four-year universities, and “introduceinterdisciplinary learning in the undergraduate environment” [2]. The year 2020 is no longer adistant
aspects.Through this NSF funded project, the authors are exploring a new strategy of teaching S&Rconcepts to civil engineering students. The goal is to permeate the S&R concepts into the CEcurriculum by injecting content into existing curriculum from freshman to senior years. Toachieve this goal, the research team selected twelve courses that range from freshmen to senioryears from the current Boise State Civil Engineering curriculum to introduce S&R concepts viaactive learning modules designed to help students understand the underlying philosophies ofS&R and their importance to civil infrastructure. Eight of the twelve courses are required courseswhile the remaining four are senior electives. This paper details the procedures followed
students in the United Statesare prepared for a pathway to STEM degrees in college. In addition to new engineering activities addedto science class, various types of dual credit engineering courses for high school students are offeredalong with plans for an Advanced Placement (AP) introduction to engineering course in the comingyears. Dual credit introduction to engineering courses, like the NSF-funded Engineering For US All(E4USA) project, are poised to offer high school students rigorous engineering content and theopportunity for college credit [2].1.1 Background- ENGR 102 HS dual credit programENGR 102 HS is one such dual credit engineering course that is modeled after the introduction coursefor engineering majors at the University of Arizona
attend lectures in person on any given day.In addition to watching lectures, students complete one project-based homework assignmenteach week. These assignments involve reading, writing, solving and reasoning about a mini-project like single problem in MATLAB which are expected to be difficult. Due to theirdifficulty, students are able to collaborate with other students, attend office hours, and access theinternet for help throughout the week.The other course resources offered are standard among any introductory programming course:practice exams, office hours, and some additional content on the course’s online page. Thestructure of the exams is also fairly standard. About half of the exam involves solving problemsby writing out programmatic
Paper ID #29123Extending Faculty Development through a Sustainable Community of Prac-ticeSarah Hoyt, Arizona State University Sarah Hoyt is currently the Education Project Manager for the NSF-funded JTFD Engineering faculty development program. Her educational background includes two Master’s degrees from Grand Canyon University in Curriculum and Instruction and Education Administration. Her areas of interest are in student inclusion programs and creating faculty development that ultimately boost engagement and per- formance in students from lower SES backgrounds. Prior to her role as project manager, Sarah worked as
Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology (CRESMET), and an evaluator for several NSF projects. His first research strand concentrates on the relationship between educational policy and STEM education. His second research strand focuses on studying STEM classroom interactions and subsequent effects on student understanding. He is a co- developer of the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP) and his work has been cited more than 2800 times and he has been published in multiple peer-reviewed journals such as Science Education and the Journal of Research in Science Teaching.Lydia Ross, Arizona State University Dr. Lydia Ross is a clinical assistant professor in the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College
dilemma andpossible solutions [27]. Likewise, Jones [28] believes that to bring awareness to key ethicalissues, these issues should be discussed in every computer course throughout the curriculum.Jones[28] suggests that it is important that students learn the technical aspects of the computertopic and the ethical issues related to that topic. Like Quinn [26], Jones [28] suggests the use ofethics-related projects tailored to the computer topic covered. Chowdhury [29] also agrees withQuinn [26], Metcalf et al. [27], and Jones [28], and suggests embedding ethical and moral issuesthroughout the computer curriculum. Chowdhury [29] recommends the use of role-play, drama,simulation, educational games, debates, discussions, projects, group work and other
BS degree in electrical engineering (1975) from California State University, Sacramento, and his MS (1980) and DE (1983) degrees in industrial engineering from Texas A&M University. His educa- tion and research interests include project management, innovation and entrepreneurship, and embedded product/system development. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Professional Development Activities for SecondarySTEM Teachers and Students’ Engineering Content Knowledge and AttitudesAbstractTo promote an integrated Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology (STEM) educationin K-12 school levels and cultivate STEM literacy in the society, there is a growing interest
asked to recordtheir personality profile on the survey. The survey had two main questions requiring students torank their interest level and strength in topics discussed in the course. Projects in the courseemphasize different engineering disciplines while developing students’ professional skills inteamwork, technical communication and problem solving, along with creativity,entrepreneurship and sustainability. The course is described in detail and the survey instrument isreproduced in Reference [1]. Students rank ordered the topics from the one that appealed to themthe most (#1) to the one that appealed to them the least (#7). They also ranked a list of nineattributes related to topics covered in the course from the one in which they were the
Autonomous People Mover Alex Avery, Joe Hudden, David Ruan, Eric Schulken, Cody Smith, Jessica VanGiesen, Michael Zielinski, Ray Ptucha Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA of majors work in groups to complete projects over the course ABSTRACT of two semesters. The class structure dictates that the firstMost automobile forecasters predict that by the mid-2020’s semester be devoted to design, research, and planning, whileautonomous driving will transform the automobile market. the second semester is to be
meet theirneeds. To date, we have piloted the first two of the minor’s approximately six courses. The firstis a variation on the existing Computer Science I course required for majors but restricted to non-majors. Both versions of the course use the Python language and cover the same programmingcontent, but with the non-majors assigned projects with relevance to non-CS disciplines. We usethe same student assessment measures of homework, projects, and examinations for bothcourses. After four semesters, results show that non-CS majors perform comparably to majors.Students also express increased interest in computing and satisfaction with being part of a non-CS major cohort.The second course was piloted in fall 2019. It is a new course intended
boards. The designers of the course experimented withthe addition of virtual components. Hence a pilot project was initiated to create a virtualenvironment within which students could access and interact with the course content. A virtualcampus environment was created with buildings, trees, birds, walking paths, grass, and othercampus-like attributes. Students represent themselves with an avatar and are free to enter abuilding related to a specific course module and select and enter doors labeled for interactiveactivities. Upon entering, they engage in the selected activity. At that point use of the technologyhas led them to an experience with the social science content. Technical fluency and a betterunderstanding of society are outcomes that
formulation,efficient application of software features, and communication of their findings in a report format.An effective pedagogy is developed to assist students with problem formulation while enforcinganalytical skills and guiding writing reports. I have utilized pedagogy tools such as handoutswith specific guidelines and extensive examples, in-class discussions, homework assignments,and a final project to enforce report writing and analytical thinking. Moreover, I stress theimportance of analyzing the software’s solutions further to obtain more useful information.Though writing a “Report to a Manager” has been an element of my OR courses since 1999, thenew approach has evolved in the last three years. This new approach is aimed at
strong leaders who served as rector (AAU) or chancellor(VIT) for approximately 25 years and both leaders had strong support from the faculty and staff.Sven Casperson was the rector at Aalborg University which focused upon project basededucation and AAU became the world leader in that type of educational system. GovindasamyViswanathan was founder and chancellor of VIT University and focused upon assuring quality inthe education system. Previous papers have presented the Aalborg Educational system1,2,3 andthis paper will focus on VIT University.VIT University Background The keys to the success of VIT University have been the leadership of Mr. Viswanathanand his commitment to quality at the university. His BS and MS degrees were in
State University Stephen J. Krause is Professor in the School of Materials in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. His teaching responsibilities are in the areas of bridging engineering and education, design and selection of materials, general materials engineering, polymer science, and characterization of materials. His research interests are in innovative education in engineering and K-12 engineering outreach. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory for assessing fundamental knowledge of students in introductory materials engineering classes. Most recently, he has been working on Project Pathways, an NSF supported Math Science Partnership, in developing
contextual knowing.Preliminary student feedback has been fairly mixed with many students feeling morecomfortable with the traditional passive and prescriptive approach whereas other studentswere very positive and indicated that the new approach has been responsible for their decisionto continue with their enrolment in engineering.IntroductionThe transformation of professional engineering workplace discourse from one of highlypositivist technical in nature to one of social practice has been predicted as an evolutionaryprocess of the professionalization project. Verblen2 saw that the rise of technocracy will leadto the engineering profession becoming the guardian of community welfare by ensuring thatindustry and the economy are kept away from chaos
productivity dose not increase in a linear manner with increased number of workers. The Page 12.444.2game’s results show the effect of increasing group size on productivity and many similaritiesof construction work.MotivationMany construction students struggle with the concepts and ideas of construction. This iscomplicated by the fact that it is very difficult to expose them to actual construction operationsbecause of the lack of an appropriate project, distance to projects, class size and time neededfor the visit. Many students gain valuable experience during internships and coops.However this experience may not always be applicable to the current
. Mechanics B B B B 7. Experiments B B B B M/30 8. Problem recognition and solving B B B M/30 9. Design B B B B B E 10. Sustainability B B B E 11. Contemp. Issues & hist. perspectives B B B E 12. Risk and uncertainty B B B E 13. Project management B B B E 14. Breadth in civil engineering areas B B B B 15. Technical specialization
shouldquality visual-based learning material in technology education have to be effective andefficient in transmitting information for grades 7-12? RQ2: What are the indicators of thelearner’s characteristics that impact the selection of visual-based learning material intechnology education for grades 7-12? The quality indicators were determined by consensusreached by a panel of 21 educational experts randomly selected from participants in two NSFfunded projects that piloted and field-tested visual learning material in technology educationcourses. The two funded projects were VisTE and TECH-Know. In the first round, the panelwas provided with examples of quality indicators. The example indicators in the first roundinstrument derived from the literature
solving has not been understood orembraced. As a foundational course, difficulties here can impact student academic confidenceresulting in a diminished sense of self-efficacy that is particularly problematic when amplified bygender and under-represented (URM) minorities issues. And such faltering so early in the majorcan cause a student to leave engineering.While difficulties in the course arise for several reasons, our project seeks to address the problemof context. Our hypothesis is that women and minorities particularly, and students generally, aremore likely to do well in statics when the problems are placed in the context of real worldusefulness. An approach to teaching that effectively scaffolds students' efforts at model buildingand
andimprovement in the technical content of subsequent projects. Students began to see theconnections between the public concerns and opinions, and their role as engineers in the design,development or manufacture of a product. The possibilities for media examples are endless andprovide students and faculty with a wide range of ideas to promote interest, motivation and alearning opportunity for today’s engineering student.IntroductionDo we take the material of a product for granted, or do we look at a product and remember whatit used to be made of? Do we ever stop to think about what our daily lives would be like ifscientists hadn’t explored the properties of silicon or polymers? Do we realize materials and theimportance of materials selection touches our
diagrams,to determine optimal-state locations for a two-feed distillation column construction, andto design a two-column distillation process to produce anhydrous alcohol from fermentedbeer. In the senior year, MATLAB was incorporated into the process modeling andcontrols course (ChE 432). In this course MATLAB use was straightforward in suchapplications as symbolic solution of ordinary differential equations, plotting, invertingfunctions to and from the Laplace domain, finding roots of polynomials, creating andusing transfer function models, generating dynamic system responses, and plotting rootlocus diagrams.In the second year of the project, integration was expanded to include CHE 201, thematerial and energy balances course. Here students were
either traditionalIndustrial Engineering Departments or Management Schools. While it has components incommon with both, these key features make it unique. TIM is focused on enhanced profitabilityand growth of firms through: ‚ The fusion of Knowledge Management (using information systems) with more traditionally-taught Operations and Strategy. ‚ Faculty and students with a deep understanding of technology obtained an engineering education and background. ‚ Active engagement with Silicon Valley firms through research, consulting and course projects and internships (amplified through our Silicon Valley presence).Other distinctive features of TIM are: ‚ The emphasis on integration of management science and expertise
authorization toapprove expenditures? How are donations being collected and directed to the appropriateuniversity account? It is important that the budget be closely monitored and that those who havecommitted to donate follow through. Two alternative sample budgets for sectional meetingslisting projected and actual budgets are shown in Table 4 and 5. The first includes indirectexpenses (30% overhead charged) based on contracting for services with other universitydepartments (i.e., continuing education). In the second budget part-time staff (e.g., students) arepaid in addition to those supported by the University.Tables 7 and 8 provide more recent examples of budgets for organizing a sectional meeting. Acomparison of Tables 4 and 5 with Tables 6 and 7