, committeesmust comprehensively understand the test and its purpose to make fair and informed decisions. Ashift towards a more holistic approach to admissions can help to create a more equitable andaccessible graduate school application process, but engineering program leaders must considerhow such a shift will affect other aspects of the admissions process, such as the resourcesrequired. An institution cannot suddenly shift to a holistic evaluation approach and expect thesame number of faculty or staff to handle the higher workload effectively.We plan to use the results of this study to design a more comprehensive survey that can capturethe perspectives of a wider breadth of faculty at our institution and other institutions. As moreinstitutions adapt to
, she felt the project was properly planned, and resulted in a textbook that can be extremelyuseful for students. She believes that incorporating student examples gives the students a chanceto develop and solve their own problems, which helps in the learning process. The opportunity tohave their work included in a textbook also incentivizes the students to want to participate and dotheir best work for the submissions. She recognizes that there is a range in the complexity andquality of submitted problems, but they are all useful to convey content. She encourages professorsto incorporate OERs and self-generated problems as it is financially economical for students andbeneficial for their learning.Student Researcher BStudent researcher B
).[3] U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development andOffice of the Under Secretary, “Advancing Diversity and Inclusion In Higher Education,” 2016.[4] American Society for Engineering Education, “Profiles of Engineering and EngineeringTechnology,” American Society of Engineering Education, Washington, DC, 2021.[5] Q. Ketchum, “Indigenizing ASABE: Why We Should, and How We Can,” ResourceMagazine, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 19–22, 2021.[6] G. S. May and D. E. Chubin, “A Retrospective on Undergraduate Engineering Success forUnderrepresented Minority Students,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 92, no. 1, pp.27–39, 2003, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00735.x.[7] A. Rattan, K. Savani, M. Komarraju, M. M
need.ResultsSixteen students, 15 first year students and one junior enrolled in the course. Student majorswere widely distributed as shown in Table 1.Number of students Major7 Engineering (civil, electrical, material science, mechanical, nuclear)5 Biology1 Computer Science1 Fashion and Textile Management1 Physics1 PsychologyTable 1: Breakdown of plans of academic study for students enrolled in the courseStudents were given a pre and post survey at the beginning and end of the course. Surveyquestions were divided into three broad categories, self-evaluation of prior knowledge, opinionson the importance of the interaction of
higher for the project report to satisfy theexpectations. The percentage of students receiving 70% or higher grades was calculated. Thepercentages of >90%, >80%, >70%, and <60% were considered exceeding, meeting, minimallymeeting, and not meeting expectations, respectively. Minimally meeting and not meetingexpectations required changes made or plans to do something different in the future, closing theloop for continuous improvement. The assessment for the selected outcome showed that 83% ofthe students received a grade of 70% or higher; therefore, the outcome was met.Students in the Microfabrication course were challenged with the theory and lab experiences.This hands-on course is not common at the undergraduate level. The course was
iteratively “engineer” withoutdoing the prerequisite planning, designing, or calculating that would be necessary in subtractivemanufacturing. It was clear that numerous students were printing, realizing they made amistake, then re-printing. While 3D printing is useful for rapid prototyping, it does not replacerobustness of mechanical design. Moving forward, we felt that this could be addressed byincluding some more direct information on the relative benefits and weakness of additive vs.subtractive manufacturing as well as mandating that certain components be machined insteadof printed.Anecdotally, many students told us that this project was cool and that they were excited towork on it. At our focus group over the summer, we will attempt to gain
of all committee members toindicate their approval. The final report should be submitted by the last day of the semester.The instructor may include the final report in their dossier for the annual review process andadopt the suggestions provided by the committee to improve their teaching practice in the future.The faculty member provides to the committee a written reflection report on the peerobservations including how they plan to make use of the suggestions/recommendations.The committee members review them for the next class visit and verify if the committeerecommendations are adopted by the instructor.Assessment Objectives and MethodologyThis work seeks to assess faculty perceptions of the efficacy of peer observation procedures
Plans and Support for COVID-19 Risk Mitigation MeasuresAmong Parents and Guardians,” Acad Pediatr, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 684–693, May 2021, doi:10.1016/j.acap.2020.11.017.[8] D. J. Deming, C. Goldin, L. F. Katz, and N. Yuchtman, “Can online learning bend thehigher education cost curve?,” American Economic Review, vol. 105, no. 5, pp. 496–501, May2015, doi: 10.1257/AER.P20151024.[9] S. W. Hemelt and K. M. Stange, “Why the move to online instruction won’t reducecollege costs,” Brookings, 2020. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/brown-center-chalkboard/2020/07/28/why-the-move-to-online-instruction-wont-reduce-college-costs/(accessed Jan. 17, 2023).[10] S. Hubler, “As Colleges Move Classes Online, Families Rebel Against the Cost,” TheNew York Times
, no. 4, pp. 335–361, 2006.[16] A. Collins, J. S. Brown, and S. E. Newman, “Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics,” in Knowing, learning, and instruction. Routledge, 2018, pp. 453–494.[17] M. I. Campbell and K. J. Schmidt, “Polaris: An undergraduate online portfolio system that encourages personal reflection and career planning,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 21, no. 5, p. 931, 2005.[18] B. Sattler, D. Kilgore, and J. Turns, “I have never spent time to think about what i have gained from my projects: Linking portfolio development and life-long learning,” in 2010 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 2010, pp. T3H–1.[19] A. Thompson, B
emphasize peer interactions,reinforcing the sense of empowerment-through-community as the LMP. (For a brief introductionto some of these methods, we recommend Ericson [20].) Moreover, we believe the programiteration process through which the program is continuously formed and reformed throughstudent feedback enhances student self-efficacy and empowerment. While our current program issmall, making our conclusions difficult to generalize to larger populations, the evidence providedhere provides a step toward understanding and developing best practices for peer mentorshipprograms. We recommend that institutions who may wish to implement similar programs withtheir STEM students involve the participants in the planning and implementation of
structural,process, and interpersonal dynamics that were resulting in different outcomes and experiencesfor participants in our workshops. In addition to enhancing inclusion for DHH participants, weacknowledged that slowing down and giving time for all participants to engage with theinformation presented in the slides and discussion would likely lead to better engagement andunderstanding for all.For the fall 2022 workshops, the leadership team continued to refine their thinking about howbest to support activities with mixed-hearing status groups. In alignment with our strategic goalsto ensure each campus team was making progress on their campus self-assessment andorganizational action plans, we moved towards longer campus-specific breakout rooms
basic calculus and/or physicscourses plan to continue their studies in math or physics beyond those courses. Most of thesestudents only sign up for beginning calculus and/or physics classes to satisfy general educationrequirements or to finish the prerequisites for further study [9].We argue that students' struggles with learning and comprehending numerous subjects andconcepts in these courses may be one factor in their lack of interest in these courses. The majorgoal of this study is to find a calculus-based solution so that students may comprehend the ideaand use of calculus in a circumstance or problem from real life. More precisely, we wanted todetermine how students comprehend and use concepts such as problem-solving (e.g., Hooke's law
grading approach, the author faced many obstacles andchallenges, which required extra thought and planning for the future semesters. For instance,many students procrastinated and only came for reassessments at the end of the semester,causing long lines outside the office during office hours. This was a heavy burden for theinstructor and left insufficient time for providing individualized feedback, which was the purposeof the office hour reassessments. The unlimited number of attempts did not sufficiently motivatestudents to perform better on their first tries. It also generated an excessive amount of grading.The author needs to reevaluate the number of reassessments allowed and encourage students toreflect and review before
engagements in remotemeetings, instructors can stimulate engagement by asking questions regularly and by increasingthe rate of class discussions and activities. Finally, to further support the outcomes of this studyand as future work, the author plans to expand the research and consider more offerings of Course2 to increase the sample size.References[1] A. Hassan, A. Dallal, and M. Zaghloul, “A survey-based study of students’ perspective on different remote teaching styles during COVID-19,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2021.[2] A. Dallal, M. Zaghloul, and A. Hassan, “New Instructors Perspectives on Remote Teaching Methods,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2021.[3] C. Carrillo and M. A. Flores, “COVID-19 and
to find innovative solutions in the problem space? 3 What excited you about the concept of edible entertainment? Did the project meet your expectations and why so? 4 Did the project structure and design process help you achieve the objective of: 1. Co-creating authentic experiences 2. Addressing food equity issues/taste diversity in additive manufacturing 5 What are the skills you learnt in this project that you plan to apply in your own professional practice and/or discipline of study? 6 Additional FeedbackA qualitative analysis of the survey responses led to the following discussion:Students were able to define, differentiate and appreciate the concepts of food equity, safety
that includes an essay. Thestudents are not reviewed on their academics, but on their motivation to become an engineer andtheir active participation in the Engineering LLC. This means the program focuses on the wholestudent, not just their academics. Essay Prompts in Application Why are you interested in an engineering degree, and what are your plans once you earn that engineering degree? What lessons have you personally learned from Engineering Concepts Institute and/or the Engineering LLC program?Program ElementsThe Educating Engineering Students Innovatively program, which spans the fall and springsemesters of
stimulate thought about theunique challenges encountered by Black students when navigating their engineeringenvironments. Furthermore, to maximize the impact of the work, we plan to partner with and leverage theexpertise of ethno-theater experts from academic cluster. If we wish to elevate the counternarratives ofpeople of color in ways that challenge the perpetuation of systemic racism, we must continue to find theseams of research and art to fully explore the true potential for impact. This work is a steppingstonetoward that goal.Most importantly, ethno-drama as a non-traditional mode of dissemination has the potential for morecritical engagement beyond academia. Microaggression, role negotiation, hypervisibility vs invisibilityand other
-basedinteractions. However, digital tools have been a good ally for community building andteamwork activities. Students were engaged with the activities in the classroom that includedguest lecture speakers, group discussions, and active participation toward a specific topic duringthe semester. However, data on Canvas shows that all students actively took part in creatingvideos, forum discussions, surveys online, and online group projects when they were asked touse digital tools. As their instructors, we could see their positive participation in digital and in-person modalities planned to increase classroom community and teamwork.We learned that while technology often gets blamed for reducing in person interactions, it canalso be used to facilitate them
: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-020-02468-0[22] L. S. Sadler et al., “Community-university partnerships in community-based research,” vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 463–469, 2012, doi: 10.1353/cpr.2012.0053.[23] S. E. Curwood and M. Mackeigan, “Building Effective Community-University Partnerships: Are Universities Truly Ready?” American Psychological Association (APA), 2011.[24] R. E. Pizarro, “Challenges of implementing sustainable urban design plans through community– university partnerships: lessons from Colombia, China, and Germany,” vol. 17, pp. 48–56, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.11.005. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343515001402[25] N. O. Jelks, T. L. Hawthorne, D. Dai, C. H. Fuller
choose to hide or show/run when they are ready to check their work. Setting up alive script as an unfilled template can also allow live scripts to be used as homeworkassignments.ConclusionThis work has described the use of the MATLAB Live Editor for the creation of live scripts foruse as virtual activities and laboratories to improve student engagement and learning. Severalexamples were provided and the author’s experience in piloting activities over the past two yearshas been shared. The author plans to continue developing interactive materials for use in theircourses with a further goal to formally assess their impacts on student learning. In addition to thewebsite provided by the author sharing the live script activities they have developed
discovery in a variety offields such as urban planning, environmental monitoring, and natural resource management.Large-volume 3D data in the forms of point clouds, meshes, or other representations, can becollected through sensors such as LiDAR and depth cameras. To take advantage of the benefitsarising from the use of large-volume 3D data, traditional surveying techniques are more oftenintegrated with the emerging state-of-the-art geospatial technology and 3D data analytics,offering a powerful toolset for S/G professionals to capture and analyze highly detailed andaccurate geospatial data. Recently, there has been a significant increase in the use of large-volume 3D data for various industrial purposes (e.g., product design, quality control
1. Introduction Morgan State University has received a grant of about 1.6 million dollars from BASE 11, a nonprofit 501 c3 STEMcompany whose mission is to provide access and awareness to women and minorities to pursue and succeed in careers in theareas of the Next Frontier Industries such as Aerospace, Life Sciences, Cyber Security, Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality,Data Analytics, Technology education, Advanced Manufacturing, and Autonomous Systems. BASE 11 plans to achieve thisgoal with their Next Frontier hands-on programs and events, mentoring programs, and additional resources and experiencesthat allow students the opportunity to learn from trained professionals in their respective fields. This funding will aid MorganState in
digitalstorytelling. In my classroom, I encouraged my students to use digital storytelling tocommunicate their findings and seek feedback on their engineering designs. The process ofredesigning curriculum gives engineering educators a space to critically reflect on how the taskpositions students in relation to their teacher and interrogate whether this snapshot of the learningenvironment and instructional planning is conducive to a liberatory education.Using a technology integration tool like a Google Document (Google Doc) can fall anywherefrom substitution to redefinition on the SAMR framework. One way to determine whether it is asubstitution, augmentation, modification, or redefinition is to decide the level of Bloom’s Proceedings of
or mindset with which individuals may approach problemswithin a specific domain” rather than something more related to innovation or the various otherconstructs described in the literature. Additionally, as we plan to use this survey to assess STEMstudents of multiple majors throughout their course of study, the exclusion of domain-basedknowledge as a component of AE is important - individuals may be adaptive and employadaptive approaches to problem solving without displaying strong content knowledge and thus,we can consider the adaptiveness of students at various levels of education as they progresswithin their program.Methodology and Survey DetailsAt Stevens, all first-year students are required to complete a number of subject pool
leaders inour group, but that's just more because they're already skilled with certain aspects, like CAD(Computer Aided Design).” The focus group participants identified that equal contribution of work performed by allteam members was key in keeping their teamwork projects in orbit, but they seemed to strugglewith implementing this in their own groups. They all agreed their teams had a plan to split theproject workload up, but so far some team members did not complete their parts. Participantsalso felt there was too much work to equally split between all of the team members. Otherimportant characteristics for successful teamwork mentioned in this discussion were efficiency,accuracy, and precision. The third focus group rounded off
( ) (5) 𝑠 It can be shown that the power reaches a maximum when ∆𝑃 = ∆𝜋/2.The Norwegian energy company Statkraft had operated a PRO pilot plan in 2009, but in 2013 theplant was shut down due to membrane fouling and high maintance costs [6].Fig 4. Artist impression of pilot PRO plant, constracted by Statkraft [15] In depth review of the above-mentioned techniques, along with examples of the benchtopundergraduate research experiments with PRO and RED conducted at Wentworth by two differentgroups of Electromechanical Engineering students, and a graduate level research experiment withmixing entropy battery (MEB) conducted at Northeastern will be given in this paper to illustratethe need for curriculum revision
students indicated that this approach didhelp them to draw free-body diagrams and to have a better understanding of how to draw free-body diagrams because all five types of free-body diagrams were systematically described and 10explained. We just implemented this approach last year and plan to continue this approach inour engineering statics course and will collect more feedback and comparison data in the future.5. REFERENCES[1]. Van, D. (2004, June), Designing A Mechanical Breadboard For Effective Teaching Of Engineering Statics Paper presented at 2004 Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.18260/1-2—12811[2]. Anand, S. (2005, June), Teaching Statics To Civil Engineering Students Paper
Source of Learning and Development, David A. Kolb states that “learning isthe process whereby knowledge is created through the transformation of experience” [11]. Heproposed an Experiential Learning Cycle (ELC) consisting of the following four processes: (i)active experimentation (planning and trying out what is learned); (ii) concrete experience (doingand having the experience); (iii) reflective observation (reviewing and reflecting on theexperience); (iv) abstract conceptualization (concluding and learning from the experience).Abdulwahed and Nagy applied this cycle directly to learning in a laboratory setting [12]. Theytested the effectiveness of the ELC by adding various elements to their educational laboratorythat corresponded with each
undergraduate students at a Civil Engineering program. It aims to improve theresearch competencies of civil engineering students through immersing the students in differenttypes of research exercises. The activities have been exploratory, experimental and theoretical.The focus of the new approach is on developing soft skills, gaining practical and hands-on skills,research management and planning, and presenting the results in an optimum manner. Sixundergraduate students from two departments were involved in various components of a researchproject related to the post-tensioned concrete structures. The core project started in a companyspecialized in post-tensioning industry.Initially, the learning objective was to gain a deep understanding of the
. This project helped reinforce problem-solving in engineering and helped expand our minds on another software that is possibly applicable to a future career. 3. Through this experiment, we have gained insight on how the design process works, how long we can expect our prints to take, and some of the challenges we can expect to confront.Students also comment on self-efficacy, we learned from the 3D printing assignment is that tomake a successful print you have to understand the structural needs of your design and possibleweak points. As we continue offering this course, we will develop new projects and modules to deliverto the students. We also plan to collect and publish more formal assessment data with a