is currently pursuing a PhD in Engineering Education at USU. She is Principal Investigator for Online Learning Forums for Improved Engineering Student Outcomes in Calculus, a research project funded by the NSF TUES program. Her research interests include engineering student learning, distance engineering education, and alternative pathways to engineering education.Mr. Ted Campbell, Utah State University Ted Campbell is a Lecturer in the Department of Mathematics and Statistics at Utah State University (USU). He teaches undergraduate mathematics and statistics courses via synchronous broadcast to stu- dents at the USU regional campuses. Ted has a bachelor’s degree in materials engineering from the University of
government agencies. In 2010, Dr. Lambrinidou co-conceived the graduate level engineering ethics course ”Engi- neering Ethics and the Public,” which she has been co-teaching to students in engineering and science. She is co-Principal Investigator on a National Science Foundation (NSF) research and education project developing an ethnographic approach to engineering ethics education. Page 26.322.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Canons against Cannons? Social Justice and the Engineering Ethics ImaginaryAbstractWhat if social
satisfaction; it affects the outcome1,8,9,10. Softwarespecialists DeMarco and Lister argue that project results are due less to technical issues and moreto ones related to teamwork11 ctd. in 12: If the project goes down the tubes it will be non-technical, human interaction problems that do it in. The team will fail to bind, or the developers will fail to gain rapport with users, or people with fight interminably over meaningless methodological issues.Team performance depends on the ability of its individuals to perform with others manycognitively demanding tasks: teams think, plan, design, decide, perceive, and evenremember3. Central to the performance of these tasks at the team level is communication.As a result of industry
students, ideally helping students connectwhat they are learning to their future goals. This information also can lead to recommendationsfor future survey questions that more fully capture the range of students’ actual perceptions,worries, hopes, and plans about their futures.IntroductionThe National Center for Engineering Pathways to Innovation (Epicenter) was launched in 2011on the premise that it is becoming more necessary for engineering students to learn skills relatingto innovation and entrepreneurship (I&E). The work of Epicenter aims to strengthenentrepreneurship education for engineers and expand understanding of how I&E learningenvironments influence students. As part of the Epicenter research projects collectively known
do you spend with organized extracurricular activities (sports, clubs, professional organizations)? • How many hours a week to do spend with work commitments (i.e., part-time job/work-study)? • If you have an assignment or project due in 2 weeks, how far in advance do you usually start? • If you have an exam in 2 weeks, how far in advance do you usually start studying?A group of questions also addressed questions of how students seek help, including in class,through classmates, or through other means. Students have numerous ways to get information,especially with videos and tutorials being posted online for free. These questions helpedinvestigators to better understand what students do more frequently. • How
-yearintervention project designed to enhance writing in engineering and STEM. The examplesdescribe reflective, writing-to-learn activities for first-year orientation courses; scaffoldedapproaches for laboratory and problem-based-learning classes; and directed peer review andresponse to reviewer comments in middle- and upper-level courses. The paper concludes byaddressing the vital role STEM faculty play in socializing their students into ways of thinking,being, and writing in their disciplines and demonstrates how a process orientation to writinginstruction can help faculty achieve that goal.Section I: IntroductionThe Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) has identified effectivecommunication as a key criterion of engineering
Social Psychology. Prior to joining UOEEE, she supported the research and program evaluation efforts of Maricopa County Adult Proba- tion Department, coordinated and executed the research and program evaluation for a large Department of Justice Second Chance Act grant. These efforts included monitoring, assessing, and evaluating the impacts of program outcomes. Since joining the UOEEE in 2015, Dr. Cook-Davis has led research and evaluation activities for over 50 separate grant-funded programs or initiatives funded by the National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Education, U.S. Department of State, U.S. Department of Agri- culture, National Institutes of Health, and The Kern Family Foundation. These projects
activities with science concepts, students can learn and apply scientificprinciples as they strive to design, build, modify, and test a device (an artifact). Design became atopic of discussion in science education in 1993 when the American Association for theAdvancement of Science (AAAS) published Benchmarks for Scientific Literacy 1. The AAASstated that while design projects are common in the elementary grades, that all students should Page 13.1139.3become familiar with design and technology projects in order to engage in problem-solving inreal-world contexts.The National Research Council (NRC)2 followed suit in 1996 with its own recommendations
example of such attempts is a research project in Finland which is “aimed at developing andimplementing a new structure for engineering education (EE) and for EE institutions.” 4 Indescribing the project. Lehto 4 says, The new EE model developed in Finland is based on the definition of the competence requirements for the modern engineer working in the global environment. These requirements can be summarized as the capability to do efficient engineering work (in a selected engineering field) by using modern concrete and abstract tools within the global economical, environmental, legal, and human constraints. This level of professional competence can only be achieved through a life-long process of learning and
UP projects who serve over 70,000 middle and high school students.Goal 3: Build on the professional development of public school STEM teachers-especially teachers of low-income and ethnic minority students, by providing engineering workshops that include hands-on activities to take back to the classroom. This was accomplished by inviting Texas Middle School Aerospace Scholars (MAS) and the NSF TAMU E3 Teacher Summer Research Program participants.Discover Engineering Conference PartnersSpace Engineering InstituteThe Space Engineering Institute (SEI) is credited for being the primary organizer of the DiscoverEngineering conference. In order to understand the cause of the conference it is worth explainingSEI’s
learningprocesses and Christy et al.9 deigned portfolios to identity the motivation for choosing Page 11.1000.6engineering. These purposes show that a particular portfolio program could have multiplepurposes depending on the educators’ focuses and interests.ContentGiven the different purposes for using portfolios, it is unsurprising that the portfolios alsocontained different types of content. The materials in the portfolios included diverse artifactsthat were created by students, such as students’ exams, assignments, project reports, andhomework. In addition to those artifacts, students were often required to write an entry ornarrative for each artifact or
must perform an annual assessment. Theprimary reason for this assessment is to demonstrate the learning community is meeting its statedoutcomes. There are three general reasons to assess any project or program- to improve theprogram or project; to inform stakeholders whether the program, or project, is achieving it’sgoals; or to prove a program, or project is meeting, or has met its intended goals. [6]Traditionally, the evaluation in EELC is done via different tools. For the material at hand theevaluation has been done by homework, quizzes, tests, and laboratory reports. In addition tothat, one-on-one interviews are conducted, with each student, twice during the term and wouldidentify weakness and strengths for each student. The interview
for theinstructors and to provide an interactive learning environment outside the lecture period for thestudents. Using ViTAS, students will be able to submit the homework assignments online, toengage in anonymous homework review, and to discuss with their peers. The idea of studentsgrading the homework assignments of their peers is very beneficial, because during the processof grading other’s homework, the students get the opportunity to learn/review their ownwork/mistakes. Also, the instructors finalize all grades and post them on the website to confirmthe students’ learning activities. In particular, this project focuses on the Agile systemdevelopment process, which is a group of system development methodologies based on iterative
effectivemeans to promote such intellectual growth3,4,5.Learner-centered instructional methods encompass a wide range of approaches that includeactive and collaborative learning, problem-based learning, and project-based learning6.Incorporating student-centered learning into the classroom can improve student learning6,7; canimprove student attitudes5,6; can be of particular benefit to those students whose personalitytypes and preferred learning styles impair their performance in traditional educationalenvironment8; and can improve students’ ability to solve open-ended problems9.While learner-centered methods hold the promise of improved education they do have a cost.The methods require educators to make time for the learner-centered activities and so
educational area symbolized by the vowel in STEMremain ill-defined in the educational standards that teachers and administrators use as they planthe day to day classroom experience. As a result, engineering can still be viewed as only a careeror as a way to incorporate building projects in after school programs or when time allows. Thereis a temptation to define engineering simply as an approach to solving problems with nospecialized knowledge or to define it as the various fields of study that college and universityprograms offer. The state of North Carolina has chosen to take a different view and to define theknowledge and skills associated with engineering from kindergarten through high school for allstudents, similar to the way that mathematics
experience in secondary education. Seventy-six percent of the participants hadtaught more than 10 years, with 12% teaching between 5 and 10 years, 11% teaching between 3 Page 23.505.6and 5 years, and 1% had taught less than 3 years. The teachers who attended the Manhattanworkshop represented 21 school districts across the state. Education disciplines represented andthe numbers of teachers in each were (a) physical science – 13, (b) biological science – 10, (c)mathematics – 12, (d) gifted education – 3, (e) counselors – 2, and (f) Project Lead The Way – 1.The Overland Park workshop participants represented 12 school districts, mainly in thenortheastern
development of empirical testing methods using similitude-based approaches. This approach provides significant potential for increasing the efficiency of the design process through a reduction in required full-scale testing and an expansion of the projected performance profiles using empirically-based prediction techniques. Wood’s research also includes the development of robotic ground and air vehicle systems using innovative conceptual design techniques for current technology implementations, as well as futuristic projections, applied in the framework of a senior capstone design course. Page 25.752.2
AC 2012-4880: MEASURING ENGINEERING STUDENTS’ CONTEXTUALCOMPETENCEDr. Hyun Kyoung Ro, Carnegie Mellon University Hyun Kyoung Ro is a Research Designer and Analyst in the Institutional Research and Analysis at Carnegie Mellon University.Dr. Lisa R. Lattuca, University of MichiganDr. Dan Merson, Pennsylvania State University Dan Merson is a Postdoctoral Fellow for the Center for the Study of Higher Education and the College Student Affairs program at Penn State. He received his Ph.D. in higher education from Penn State in the summer of 2011. While at Penn State, he primarily worked on the NCAA-funded Student-Athlete Climate Study (SACS), a nation-wide project to assess student-athlete’s perceptions and experiences
Hearsay Man on next project heard that motorX design A passed≠ The two situations are similar but not the sameExhibit 1. T. T. Woodson’s example of Evidence from Legal and Engineering Viewpoints. In Woodson, T. T. (1966) Introduction toEngineering Design. McGraw Hill, New York p 46. Page 15.1.4Nevertheless, it is clear that there is not only a substantial case for curriculum reformalong the lines promoted above but a widespread demand for it all levels of theengineering community. If, however, change is to
engineering studies. Such assessment results can provide the basis for thedevelopment and revamping of effective activities designed to meet program objectives andmissions.This paper reports the development and early results of a survey undertaken as part of theNational Science Foundation-funded Assessing Women in Engineering (AWE) project. Theinstrument is designed to measure undergraduate women students’ self-efficacy in studyingengineering. Self-efficacy is “belief in one’s capabilities to organize and execute the sources ofaction necessary to manage prospective situations" 2. Prior work from Blaisdell3 has shown thatfeelings of efficaciousness can be an important predictor in the success of women studyingengineering. In our project, we developed
beginningengineers, they may recognize a need to reason, make decisions, and act as engineers, such asdeveloping an optimal solution for their client. In this light, when students’ framing reflectsengineers’ framing, they may demonstrate NGSS performance expectations, not because it iswhat their teacher is assigning them to do, but because the practices and ideas serve them in Page 24.498.6solving a complex engineering problem.Research aimThis study is part of a larger NSF funded project at Tufts University geared towards integratingengineering and literacy in elementary classrooms. Over the last three years, our research teamhas collaborated with teachers
for Engineering and Technology Education (NCETE) Fellow at Utah State University while pursuing a Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction. After graduation he completed a one year appointment with the Center as a postdoctoral researcher.Prof. Kurt Henry Becker, Utah State University - Engineering Education Kurt Becker is a Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University and the current director for the Center for Engineering Education Research (CEER) which examines innovative and effective engineering education practices as well as classroom technologies that advance learning and teaching in engineering. He is also working on a National Science Foundation (NSF) funded project exploring
techniques using current technology implementations, as well as futuristic projections. Dr Wood also publishes re- search on advances in the methodology for creative electromechanical systems design.Dr. Kathy Schmidt Jackson, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Kathy Jackson is a senior research associate at Pennsylvania State University’s Schreyer Institute for Teaching Excellence. In this position, she promotes Penn State’s commitment to enriching teachingnand learning. Dr. Jackson works in all aspects of education including faculty development, instructional design, engineering education, learner support, and evaluation.Prof. Rachelle Kisst Hackett, University of the PacificElla R Sargent, University of the
Students in Undergraduate Biomedical Engineering Research ExperiencesAbstract This study investigated a Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU) program at aMidwest research university that had two community college student participants in the summerof 2012. In the 10-week summer program, under the supervision of a faculty member, thecommunity college students were paired with a graduate student and an experiencedundergraduate researcher to work on a biomedical engineering research project. The researchquestion of this study was, “What do community college students’ gain from an undergraduateresearch experience?” As this was the first year community college students participated in theREU, a case study approach was used
multi-media, group exercises,Internet exercises, and group lab projects to enhance and support direct instruction. Educatorscan enhance student learning by conducting lectures in a friendly manner, so that nobody feelsstress or is afraid to ask a question. No learning can take place in a tense environment.IV. Technology, Society and Culture Objectives and MethodologiesStudents at DeVry University are given the challenge and opportunity to guide and direct theirtechnological knowledge into responsible awareness and choices for local/global solutions ofproblems and 21st Century urgent issues. All DeVry students must pass a senior-level inter-disciplinary capstone Humanities course entitled “Technology, Society and Culture”. Thiscourse challenges
,participation in a virtual design experience, or extensive study abroad opportunity. While thetraditional study abroad experience has centered on an immersion type program, we propose thata global studies experience can be equally valuable, and, if designed appropriately, may be morevaluable to the engineering student.We describe a ten-week global studies experience that we have designed and taught forengineering and business students as part of the summer Semester at Sea Program. In particular,we describe how an engineering topic - manufacturing and the global supply chain - can best bestudied if classroom work is combined with truly multidisciplinary team projects and well-designed field visits at each country on the itinerary. Further, if
materials that bring real-world issues into classrooms. He has won awards for research and teaching excellence from the Society for Information Management, NEEDS, Decision Sciences Institute, American Society for Engineering Education, American Society for Mechanical Engineering, International Network for Engineering Education & Research, and the Project Management Institute. He is the editor-in-chief of the Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education and the managing editor of the Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research. He can be contacted at sankacs@auburn.edu. Page 22.833.1
Project - First and foremost, the new tool should have a requirement for actually building and delivering a complete robotic system. The feeling of accomplishment that comes from actually producing a working device using technology Page 22.991.3 is essential in a recruiting tool. Low-Cost - It was determined that since this was a recruiting tool, the EET/TET program (or their sponsors) should be responsible for associated costs. Thus, while the robotic platforms for competitions such as FIRST and BEST can easily cost in excess of $1000, this tool needed to have a per platform cost of less than $100. Emphasis on
engineering education. Page 22.1004.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Learning in Context: Recognizing Challenges and Rewards of Engineering Curriculum ReformAbstractThis paper examines the learning experiences of engineering faculty from four institutions asthey engaged in the first stages of a yearlong curriculum reform project. Focus group discussionsprovided insights of the personal and institutional challenges and rewards of curriculumdevelopment, the implications of which are described in detail.BackgroundOver the past few decades there has been a renewal in engineering
. Thisportfolio series was a research project and was not associated with a course. As such, theparticipants were paid, and the facilitator made no judgments or assessments of the participants’work. We refer readers wanting more details about this intervention to several articles describingprevious work that we have done using this methodology.5-8ParticipantsThe five participants whose portfolio content and survey responses we analyzed in this studychose to make preparedness portfolios that focused entirely on communication. This was thelargest number of participants choosing any one particular competency, a statistic that supportsthe idea that students know communication to be an important competency for their futures aspracticing engineers. All five of