below) involves incorporatingthe selected SHRP 2 products into multiple civil engineering courses offered in all four years ofthe undergraduate curriculum and in graduate courses. The approach follows a verticalintegration scheme which first introduces the SHRP 2 products to freshman undergraduatestudents and then presents relevant SHRP 2 products to the junior level classes with a briefreview session at the beginning to refresh their memory. The vertical integration scheme thenpresents relevant SHRP 2 products in senior/graduate level classes. The depth of technicalcontent of the SHRP 2 modules increases from freshman to senior/graduate levels—building onthe information provided in previous year(s). Furthermore, selected senior and graduate
Class period Instructor(s) N* H1 Homework Fall 2013 TR 8:00-10:45am A&B 37 H2 Homework Spring 2014 TR 8:00-10:45am A&C 32 Q1 Quizzes Fall 2014 WMF 8:00-9:50am A&C 35 Q2 Quizzes Fall 2014 MWF 11:00-12:50pm B 33 M1 ME/Quizzes Fall 2015 MWF 11:00-12:50pm B 34 M2 ME/Quizzes Fall 2015 WMF 8:00-9:50am C 27*N is the number of students included in this study based on exam scores. Students who did nottake either of the exams were excluded from the analysis.As discussed in the
Report by the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-stemed-report.pdf[3] U.S. News (2012, April 27). U.S. news announces first-ever national STEM convention. U.S. News. Retrieved from http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/stem-education/2012/04/27/us-news-announces-first-ever- national-stem-convention[4] Dahlstrom, E., Brooks, D. C., Grajek, S. & Reeves, J. (2015, December). ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2015 (Research Report). Louisville, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/library/resources/2015-student-and
Crilly, U.S. Coast Guard Academy Paul Crilly is an Professor of Electrical Engineering at the United States Coast Guard Academy. He is also an adjunct math instructor at the University of Connecticut. He received his Ph.D. from New Mexico State University, his M. S. and B.S. degrees at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, all in Electrical Engineering. He was previously an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Tennessee and was a Development Engineer at the Hewlett Packard Company. His areas of interest include laboratory development, antennas, wireless communications, signal processing, and instrumentation. c American Society for Engineering
photographs of the Freshman Design Studio are courtesy of SmithGroup.6. References[1] Bates, J. S., "A First Year Course Based on Conceptual Design," Proceedings of the ASEEAnnual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana, 2014.[2] Ambrose, S. A., Amon, C. H., "Systematic Design of a First-Year Mechanical EngineeringCourse at Carnegie Mellon University," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 86(2), 1997.[3] Knight, D. W., Carlson, L. E., Sullivan, J., "Improving Engineering Student RetentionThrough Hands-On, Team Based, First-Year Design Projects," Proceedings of the InternationalConference on Research in Engineering Education, 2007.[4] Ha, O., Fang, N., "Computer Simulation and Animation in Engineering Mechanics: ACritical Review and
involved with developing and teaching laboratory content, leading the maintenance of the in-house robotics controller, and managing the development of the robotics project.Dr. Kathleen A. Harper, Ohio State University Kathleen A. Harper is a senior lecturer in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. She received her M. S. in physics and B. S. in electrical engineering and applied physics from Case Western Reserve University, and her Ph. D. in physics from The Ohio State University. She has been on the staff of Ohio State’s University Center for the Advancement of Teaching, in addition to teaching in both the physics and engineering education departments. She is currently a member of the ASEE
/designteach/teach/examwrappers/Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. NY:Routledge. 12Karen L. Smith Faculty Center for Teaching and Learning. (2019, February 4). What is the Scholarship of Teaching& Learning (SoTL)? Retrieved from http://www.fctl.ucf.edu/ResearchAndScholarship/SoTL/Klingbeil, N. W., and A. Bourne. (2013, June). A National Model for Engineering Mathematics Education:Longitudinal Impact at Wright State University.In Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.Klingbeil, N. W., R. E. Mercer, K. S. Rattan, M. L. Raymer, and D. B. Reynolds
, “Designing and teaching courses to satisfy the ABET engineering criteria”, Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 92(1), pp. 7-25, 2003.[4] R. M. Felder et al., “The future of engineering education II. Teaching methods that work”. Chemical Engineering Education, vol. 34(1), pp. 26-39, 2000.[5] M. Srinivasan et al., “Comparing problem-based learning with case-based learning: effects of a major curricular shift at two institutions”, Academic Medicine, vol. 82(1), pp. 74-82, 2007.[6] J. E. Mills and D.F. Treagust, “Engineering education—Is problem-based or project-based learning the answer”, Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 3(2), pp. 2-16, 2003.[7] H. S. Barrows, Simulated (Standardized) Patients and Other
, and the sequence of topics follows that of most introductory statistics textbooks. Most chapters of the course textbook [3] are covered, but some sections are not covered at all and others are covered superficially. Table 1 provides a summarized listing of the course topics, their sequence, and the instructional emphasisTable 1 – Current Topic Coverage & Instruction EmphasisTopic Area Weeks Topic Coverage H S C Sampling methods: Random, systematic, stratified.Obtaining Data 0% 0% 100% Types of
Community, https://www.mechatronicseducation.org/.[6] Mechatronics Education Community Workshops & Webinars, https://www.mechatronicseducation.org/events/.[7] R. Comerford, “Mecha … What?” IEEE Spectrum, Vol. 31, No. 8, pp. 46-49, 1994.[8] S. Ashley, “Getting a Hold on Mechatronics.” Mechanical Engineering Magazine, Vol. 119, No. 5, pp. 60-63, 1997.[9] D. Talbot, “10 Emerging Technologies that will Change the World: Mechatronics.” Technology Review: MIT’s Magazine of Innovation, Vol. 106, No. 1, pp. 40-41, 2003.[10] A. S. Brown, “Who Owns Mechatronics?” Mechanical Engineering Magazine, Vol. 129, No. 6, pp. 60-63, 2008.[11] M.A. Gennert, G. Tryggvason, “Robotics Engineering: A Discipline Whose Time Has
. Pollack. “Why are There Still So Few Women in Science?” The New York Time Magazine, 2013.[8] J. Haidt. The Righteous Mind. New York: Vintage, 2012.[9] J. Graham, J.Haidt, S. Koleva, M. Motyl, R. Iyer, S.P. Wojcik, P.H. Ditto. “Moral Foundations Theory: The Prgamatic Validity of Moral Pluralism.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 47, pp. 55-130.[10] J. Haidt, J Graham. 2007. “When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize.” Social Justice Research, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 98-116.[11] J.L. Napier and J.B. Luguri. “Moral Mind-Sets: Abstract Thinking Increases a Preference for “Individualizing” over “binding” Moral Foundations.” Social
mitigate the potential for anyduplicative efforts by content designers.AcknowledgmentThis work has been funded by the United States Department of Transportation’s UniversityTransportation Center program through the Pacific Northwest Regional UniversityTransportation Center (PacTrans). The authors would like to acknowledge Ying Jiang,University of Washington, for her assistance with this study.References[1] Chang, K. Examining and Defining the Role of Engineering Education in theWorkplace. QScience Proceedings: 2014 Engineering Leaders Conference, 2015. 31.[2] Lipinski, M. ASCE Policy 465: The Impact of Transportation Engineering WorkforceDevelopment. ITE Journal, 2005. 12: 24-27.[3] Lockwood, S. and G. Euler. Transportation System Management and
timing of activities and scaffolding would allow campers to progressto activities that require more independence and stronger understanding.The end of day closing session was modeled after the 3rd through 5th grade camps [1] and didn’tfit well in this camp. The format involved discussing the results of each of the activities doneduring the day, acknowledging the winning camper teams by bringing them up to the front of thecamp, and having the winning teams explain their design and the process they experienced inachieving their success. The end of day also included each team teacher lead recognizing certaincampers from their team that best exhibited the habits of mind that day, as well as a dining awardfor the camper(s) who exhibited commendable
. Pierrakos, T. K. Beam, J. Constantz, A. Johri, and R. Anderson, “On the development of a professional identity: Engineering persisters vs engineering switchers,” Proc. - Front. Educ. Conf. FIE, no. 2, pp. 1–6, 2009.[5] K. L. Meyers, M. W. Ohland, A. L. Pawley, S. E. Silliman, and K. A. Smith, “Factors relating to engineering identity,” Glob. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 119–131, 2012.[6] H. M. Matusovich, R. A. Streveler, and R. L. Miller, “Why do students choose engineering? A qualitative, longitudinal investigation of students’ motivational values,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 289–303, 2010.[7] K. L. Tonso, Student engineers and engineer identity: Campus engineer identities as figured world, vol. 1, no
of their qualitative experiences and translate that meaning intodesign. Future work will include designing a larger constellation of these communication designlearning experiences for students during their senior capstone.Bibliography1. Sheridan, K. M. Envision and Observe: Using the Studio Thinking Framework for Learning and Teaching in Digital Arts. Mind, Brain, Educ. 5, 19–26 (2011).2. Hetland, L., Winner, E., Veenema, S. & Sheridan, K. M. Studio Thinking 2: The Real Benefits Of Studio Art Education. 164 (Teachers College Press, 2013).3. Sandell, R., Education, A., Burton, J. M. & Beudert, L. What Excellent Visual Arts Teaching Looks Like. Advocacy White Pap. Art Educ. (2009).4. Percy, C. critical
., “Schemas versus mental models in human memory,” In Modelling Cognition edited by P. Morris, Wiley, NewYork, pp. 187-197, 19873. Katona, G., 1901-1981. Organizing and memorizing; studies in the psychology of learning and teaching, New York, Columbia university press, 1940.4. Davis, K., Improving Motivation and Knowledge Retention with Repeatable Low-Stakes Quizzing, Compendium of Technical Papers of the 2009 Annual Conference and Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education, Austin, Texas, June 14-17, 2009.5. Handlesman, J., D. Ebert-May, R. Beichner, P. Burns, A. Chang, R. DeHaan, J. Gentile, S. Lauffer, J. Steward, S. M. Tilghman, and W. B. Wood, “Scientific Teaching,” Science, 304 (5670), pp. 521-522, 2004.6
,instructional videos, and mentorship are critical to the success of open-ended projects.The next major focus of the first-year engineering program is develop a mentorship program tosupport course projects. When students propose their own ideas, it helps to have a mechanismthat finds experts to support their project. Teaching assistants with experience in the proposedareas are a valuable resource to guide students from their conceptual design to productdevelopment. Further research is needed to understand and improve the role of the mentors foreach RAD project.References [1] Walsh, D., (2004) A Freshman Design Experience Using Rapid Prototyping. In 2004 ASEE Annual Conference proceedings. [2] Meyers, K., & Conner, B. P., & Morgan, A. S
. Electrical and Computer Engineering, Gordon & Jill Bourns[2] Sheppard, S., et al., Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of College of Engineering, California Baptist University, the Field. Jossey-Bass, 2009. Seth.Truitt@calbaptist.edu[3] Sheppard, S., et al., Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field. Jossey-Bass, 2009, Book Highlights, Matthias Schmidt Student (and IEEE student club http://archive.carnegiefoundation.org/pdfs/elibrary/elibrary_pdf_769. president), Electrical and Computer Engineering, Gordon & pdf; see Figures 1 and 2 on pages 9-10. Jill Bourns College of Engineering
question of commodities, an S-curve ofdevelopment with creative destruction, and the Ehrlich-Simon bet. The conclusion of themodule requires students to write a reflective essay where they analyze the presentations moreformally for the intended audience, author biases, and methodologies. The students are asked tofind one thing they agree with and disagree with on both sides of the debate. Current students(2017) seem to readily accept ecological concerns about consumerism and show a desire forfairness and equity. This author believes those attitudes are well established in current K-12education. This provides a nice frame, as time allows, to introduce principles from sustainabilityengineering and design, which are intended to analyze rigorously the
[11] Joreome Buvat, Ramya Puttur, Mike Turner, and Marisa Slatter. 2017. Cybersecurity Talent the Big Gap in Cyber Protection Eight Recommendations for How Organizations Can Bridge the Cybersecurity Talent Gab. (July 2017). Retrieved June 7, 2018 from https://www.capgemini.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/the- cybersecurity-talent-gap-v8_web.pdf[12] Masas, S., Hallaq, B., and Maennel, O. 2017. Obtaining Better Metrics for Complex Serious Games Within Virtualised Simulation Environments. In European Conference on Games Based Learning. Academic Conferences International Limited, United Kingdom, Reading, 428-434.[13] National Cyber Foundation. 2016. Secure and Trustworth Cyberspace (SaTC) FY 2016 NSF Budget Request to
elective none of which is humanities & social restricted to technical sciences)* Includes 23 hours of upper division and EGR 225, EGR 226 and EGR 235.References 1. One University in Many Places: Transitional Design to Twenty-First Century Excellence www.asu.edu/president/univdesign/OneUniversity80305.ppt 2. C. Roberts, D. Morrell, R. Grondin, C.-Y. Kuo, R. Hinks, S. Danielson, and M. Henderson, “Developing a Multidisciplinary Engineering Program at Arizona State University’s East Campus,” 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Portland, June 2005 3. Annette
University. This experience enabled usto choose the teaching principles, namely different aspects of problem based learning that bestimprove student learning and motivation. The pilot program of dispersed product developmentteams was a success and is continuing today. We highly recommend similar programs to otherschools as well.Bibliography1. Meier, M. Best practice in product design: concept outlines and experiences in project-oriented product design education. International Journal of Engineering Education. Vol 19. No 5. pp. 338–345.2. Eppinger, S. D. and Kressy, M. S. 2002. Interdisciplinary product development education at MIT and RISD. Design Management Journal. Summer 2002. pp. 58–61.3. de Graaf, E. and Kolmos, A. 2003
Engineering Education (CAEE). Page 12.94.11Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography[1] Huang, G., Taddese, N., Walter, E. Entry and Persistence of Women and Minorities in College Science and Engineering Education. NCES 2000-601. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics, 2000.[2] Besterfield-Sacre, M.E., Atman, C.J., Shuman, L.J. "How freshman attitudes change in the first year," ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, vol. 1, pp
for optimum learning? Wecall on engineering educators to continue their efforts to develop a curriculum theory for the fieldof engineering that will guide the discipline in optimizing the process of designing the bestcurriculum for the U.S. engineers of the future. References 1. Blanchard,Benjamin S. and Fabrycky, Wolter J. Systems Engineering and Analysis. 4 ed. Prentice Hall International Series in Industrial and Systems Engineering. W.J. Fabrycky and J.H. Mize. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2006. 2. Kotnour, Timothy, and John V. Farr. "Engineering Management: Past, Present, and Future." Engineering Management Journal 17, no. 1 (2005): 15-26. 3. Farr
. Consequently, they spentmost of their time on Project Realization and the least amount of time on Alternative Solutions.The team made 16 iterations between Problem Scoping and Alternative Solution stages to clarify Page 12.89.7the problem. Figure 3 shows these iterations in a timeline. The behavior of this team is similar tothe expert designers’ behavior reported by Dwarakanath, S. and Blessing22 who found that expertdesigners entered the searching for concepts (alternative solutions) phase earlier but had morestep backs to the clarification of the task in their proceedings. Experts started by brainstormingalternative solutions and then systematically
that Group 1 received. The objectives, theory, and otherinformation have been omitted in the interest of space.“… with the CIPHER encode the following message. Also give the across R3 voltage roundedto the nearest whole number and encode the value at the end of the phraseTHE CIRCUIT PARAMETERS ARE AS FOLLOWS, R4 3, R2 6, R3 9, VS 30. R2 ANDR3 ARE IN PARALLEL AND THEIR COMBINATION IS IN SERIES WITH R4 ANDTHIS IS THEN IN SERIES WITH VS. THE VOLTAGE ACROSS R3 ISCIPHER A a) D K Z 7 V d) c) S . e) C 9 P G > <
0% engineering and new technologies without the aid of 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 formal instruction. Engineering &Technology Goals Page 12.568.11Figure 8: End of Course Survey Data for ME450The best indication of the success of ME450’s hands-on approach to
module can benefit them professionally.ReferencesABET, 2006, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs: Effective for Evaluations During the 2007-2008Accreditation Cycle,” Engineering Accreditation Commission, retrieved January 17, 2007 fromwww.abet.org/forms.shtml .ASCE, 2004, “Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century: Preparing the Civil Engineer for theFuture,” Body of Knowledge Committee of the Committee on Academic Prerequisites for Professional Practice,retrieved January 17, 2007 from www.asce.org/professional/educ/bodyofknowledge.cfm .Covey, S. R., 1989, The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People: Restoring the Character Ethic, Simon andSchuster, New York, NY, 340 p.Downing, C. G., 2001, “Essential Non-Technical
. 70-73, 2004.3. B. Wayne Bequette, "A laptop-based studio course for process control," IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 25,1, pp. 45-49, 2005.4. Dennis S. Bernstein, "The Quanser DC Motor Control Trainer," IEEE Control Systems Magazine,3, pp. 90-93, 2005.5. Peter J. Gawthrop and Euan McGookin, "A LEGO-Based Control Experiment," IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 24,5, pp. 43-56, 2004.6. B.S. Heck, N.S. Clements, and A.A. Ferri, "A LEGO Experiment for Embedded Control System Design," IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 24,5, pp. 61-64, 2004.7. K.H. Lundberg, K.A. Lilienkamp, and G. Marsden, "Low-Cost Magnetic Levitation Project Kits," IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 24,5, pp. 65-69, 2004.8
301 Spring 2006 Ethics Paper Assignment Engineering Ethics Paper Due Wednesday, April 12, 2006Each person has been randomly assigned to a group. Each group has been assigned onecase. The group is to review the case, using the NCEES Model Rules of ProfessionalConduct, and at least one engineering society’s Codes of Ethics to form an opinion.The group will act as a Board of Ethical Review and develop an opinion (ruling) on theengineer’s behavior. The group will write a three to five page paper (12 pt, doublespaced, 1 inch margins) briefly describing the case, stating and answering the majorquestion(s), highlighting any additional ethical questions that may appear in the case, andstating