Asee peer logo
Well-matched quotation marks can be used to demarcate phrases, and the + and - operators can be used to require or exclude words respectively
Displaying results 27361 - 27390 of 36240 in total
Conference Session
Use of Technology in Civil Engineering Courses
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Yusuf A Mehta, Rowan University; Parth Bhavsar, Rowan University; Ayman Ali, Rowan University
Tagged Divisions
Civil Engineering
below) involves incorporatingthe selected SHRP 2 products into multiple civil engineering courses offered in all four years ofthe undergraduate curriculum and in graduate courses. The approach follows a verticalintegration scheme which first introduces the SHRP 2 products to freshman undergraduatestudents and then presents relevant SHRP 2 products to the junior level classes with a briefreview session at the beginning to refresh their memory. The vertical integration scheme thenpresents relevant SHRP 2 products in senior/graduate level classes. The depth of technicalcontent of the SHRP 2 modules increases from freshman to senior/graduate levels—building onthe information provided in previous year(s). Furthermore, selected senior and graduate
Conference Session
Homework, Learning, and Problem Solving in Mechanics
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Robert O'Neill, Florida Gulf Coast University; Ashraf Badir P.E., Florida Gulf Coast University; Long Duy Nguyen P.E., Florida Gulf Coast University; Derek James Lura PhD, Florida Gulf Coast University
Tagged Divisions
Mechanics
Class period Instructor(s) N* H1 Homework Fall 2013 TR 8:00-10:45am A&B 37 H2 Homework Spring 2014 TR 8:00-10:45am A&C 32 Q1 Quizzes Fall 2014 WMF 8:00-9:50am A&C 35 Q2 Quizzes Fall 2014 MWF 11:00-12:50pm B 33 M1 ME/Quizzes Fall 2015 MWF 11:00-12:50pm B 34 M2 ME/Quizzes Fall 2015 WMF 8:00-9:50am C 27*N is the number of students included in this study based on exam scores. Students who did nottake either of the exams were excluded from the analysis.As discussed in the
Conference Session
Issues in Engineering Technology Education I
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Leroy L. Long III, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
Report by the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-stemed-report.pdf[3] U.S. News (2012, April 27). U.S. news announces first-ever national STEM convention. U.S. News. Retrieved from http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/stem-education/2012/04/27/us-news-announces-first-ever- national-stem-convention[4] Dahlstrom, E., Brooks, D. C., Grajek, S. & Reeves, J. (2015, December). ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2015 (Research Report). Louisville, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/library/resources/2015-student-and
Conference Session
Engineering Physics Technical Session 2
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ian Frommer, US Coast Guard Academy; Paul Benjamin Crilly, U.S. Coast Guard Academy
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics & Physics
Crilly, U.S. Coast Guard Academy Paul Crilly is an Professor of Electrical Engineering at the United States Coast Guard Academy. He is also an adjunct math instructor at the University of Connecticut. He received his Ph.D. from New Mexico State University, his M. S. and B.S. degrees at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, all in Electrical Engineering. He was previously an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Tennessee and was a Development Engineer at the Hewlett Packard Company. His areas of interest include laboratory development, antennas, wireless communications, signal processing, and instrumentation. c American Society for Engineering
Conference Session
First-Year Programs: Integrating Computing into the First Year
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Oziel Rios, University of Texas, Dallas; Dani Fadda, University of Texas, Dallas
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
photographs of the Freshman Design Studio are courtesy of SmithGroup.6. References[1] Bates, J. S., "A First Year Course Based on Conceptual Design," Proceedings of the ASEEAnnual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana, 2014.[2] Ambrose, S. A., Amon, C. H., "Systematic Design of a First-Year Mechanical EngineeringCourse at Carnegie Mellon University," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 86(2), 1997.[3] Knight, D. W., Carlson, L. E., Sullivan, J., "Improving Engineering Student RetentionThrough Hands-On, Team Based, First-Year Design Projects," Proceedings of the InternationalConference on Research in Engineering Education, 2007.[4] Ha, O., Fang, N., "Computer Simulation and Animation in Engineering Mechanics: ACritical Review and
Conference Session
Technical Session 13: Digital Learning
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jared Dean Mitten, Ohio State University; Andrew H. Phillips, Ohio State University; Kathleen A. Harper, Ohio State University; Richard J. Freuler, Ohio State University
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education
involved with developing and teaching laboratory content, leading the maintenance of the in-house robotics controller, and managing the development of the robotics project.Dr. Kathleen A. Harper, Ohio State University Kathleen A. Harper is a senior lecturer in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. She received her M. S. in physics and B. S. in electrical engineering and applied physics from Case Western Reserve University, and her Ph. D. in physics from The Ohio State University. She has been on the staff of Ohio State’s University Center for the Advancement of Teaching, in addition to teaching in both the physics and engineering education departments. She is currently a member of the ASEE
Conference Session
First-Year Programs: Mathematics in the First Year
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Leroy L. Long III, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Claudia Morello, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs, Mathematics
/designteach/teach/examwrappers/Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. NY:Routledge. 12Karen L. Smith Faculty Center for Teaching and Learning. (2019, February 4). What is the Scholarship of Teaching& Learning (SoTL)? Retrieved from http://www.fctl.ucf.edu/ResearchAndScholarship/SoTL/Klingbeil, N. W., and A. Bourne. (2013, June). A National Model for Engineering Mathematics Education:Longitudinal Impact at Wright State University.In Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.Klingbeil, N. W., R. E. Mercer, K. S. Rattan, M. L. Raymer, and D. B. Reynolds
Conference Session
Technical Session 3: The Best of Computers in Education
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kyle Johnsen, University of Georgia; Siddharth Savadatti, University of Georgia
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education
, “Designing and teaching courses to satisfy the ABET engineering criteria”, Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 92(1), pp. 7-25, 2003.[4] R. M. Felder et al., “The future of engineering education II. Teaching methods that work”. Chemical Engineering Education, vol. 34(1), pp. 26-39, 2000.[5] M. Srinivasan et al., “Comparing problem-based learning with case-based learning: effects of a major curricular shift at two institutions”, Academic Medicine, vol. 82(1), pp. 74-82, 2007.[6] J. E. Mills and D.F. Treagust, “Engineering education—Is problem-based or project-based learning the answer”, Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 3(2), pp. 2-16, 2003.[7] H. S. Barrows, Simulated (Standardized) Patients and Other
Conference Session
Multidisciplinary Engineering Courses
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
James Burns, Western Michigan University; Megan Hammond, Western Michigan University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Multidisciplinary Engineering
, and the sequence of topics follows that of most introductory statistics textbooks. Most chapters of the course textbook [3] are covered, but some sections are not covered at all and others are covered superficially. Table 1 provides a summarized listing of the course topics, their sequence, and the instructional emphasisTable 1 – Current Topic Coverage & Instruction EmphasisTopic Area Weeks Topic Coverage H S C Sampling methods: Random, systematic, stratified.Obtaining Data 0% 0% 100% Types of
Conference Session
Multidisciplinary Engineering Experiences
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michael A. Gennert, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Nima Lotfi, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville; James A. Mynderse, Lawrence Technological University; Monique Jethwani; Vikram Kapila, NYU’s Tandon School of Engineering
Tagged Divisions
Multidisciplinary Engineering
Community, https://www.mechatronicseducation.org/.[6] Mechatronics Education Community Workshops & Webinars, https://www.mechatronicseducation.org/events/.[7] R. Comerford, “Mecha … What?” IEEE Spectrum, Vol. 31, No. 8, pp. 46-49, 1994.[8] S. Ashley, “Getting a Hold on Mechatronics.” Mechanical Engineering Magazine, Vol. 119, No. 5, pp. 60-63, 1997.[9] D. Talbot, “10 Emerging Technologies that will Change the World: Mechatronics.” Technology Review: MIT’s Magazine of Innovation, Vol. 106, No. 1, pp. 40-41, 2003.[10] A. S. Brown, “Who Owns Mechatronics?” Mechanical Engineering Magazine, Vol. 129, No. 6, pp. 60-63, 2008.[11] M.A. Gennert, G. Tryggvason, “Robotics Engineering: A Discipline Whose Time Has
Conference Session
Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session - Ethics Decision-Making
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jonathan Beever, University of Central Florida; Laurie A. Pinkert, University of Central Florida
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
. Pollack. “Why are There Still So Few Women in Science?” The New York Time Magazine, 2013.[8] J. Haidt. The Righteous Mind. New York: Vintage, 2012.[9] J. Graham, J.Haidt, S. Koleva, M. Motyl, R. Iyer, S.P. Wojcik, P.H. Ditto. “Moral Foundations Theory: The Prgamatic Validity of Moral Pluralism.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 47, pp. 55-130.[10] J. Haidt, J Graham. 2007. “When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize.” Social Justice Research, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 98-116.[11] J.L. Napier and J.B. Luguri. “Moral Mind-Sets: Abstract Thinking Increases a Preference for “Individualizing” over “binding” Moral Foundations.” Social
Conference Session
Writers, Experts, and the Workforce in Civil Engineering
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kevin Chang P.E., University of Idaho, Moscow; Benjamin David Lutz, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University
Tagged Divisions
Civil Engineering
mitigate the potential for anyduplicative efforts by content designers.AcknowledgmentThis work has been funded by the United States Department of Transportation’s UniversityTransportation Center program through the Pacific Northwest Regional UniversityTransportation Center (PacTrans). The authors would like to acknowledge Ying Jiang,University of Washington, for her assistance with this study.References[1] Chang, K. Examining and Defining the Role of Engineering Education in theWorkplace. QScience Proceedings: 2014 Engineering Leaders Conference, 2015. 31.[2] Lipinski, M. ASCE Policy 465: The Impact of Transportation Engineering WorkforceDevelopment. ITE Journal, 2005. 12: 24-27.[3] Lockwood, S. and G. Euler. Transportation System Management and
Conference Session
Pre-College Engineering Education Division Poster Session
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Laura Bottomley, North Carolina State University; Susan Beth D'Amico, North Carolina State University; Amber L. M. Kendall, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach; Daniel Gordon Mendiola Bates, North Carolina State University; Whitney N. McCoy, North Carolina State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education
timing of activities and scaffolding would allow campers to progressto activities that require more independence and stronger understanding.The end of day closing session was modeled after the 3rd through 5th grade camps [1] and didn’tfit well in this camp. The format involved discussing the results of each of the activities doneduring the day, acknowledging the winning camper teams by bringing them up to the front of thecamp, and having the winning teams explain their design and the process they experienced inachieving their success. The end of day also included each team teacher lead recognizing certaincampers from their team that best exhibited the habits of mind that day, as well as a dining awardfor the camper(s) who exhibited commendable
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Derrick James Satterfield, University of Nevada, Reno; Jacqueline Ann Rohde, Purdue University; Miguel Rodriguez, Florida International University; Beverly Ma, University of Nevada, Reno; Jacqueline Doyle; Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Geoff Potvin, Florida International University; Lisa Benson, Clemson University; Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
. Pierrakos, T. K. Beam, J. Constantz, A. Johri, and R. Anderson, “On the development of a professional identity: Engineering persisters vs engineering switchers,” Proc. - Front. Educ. Conf. FIE, no. 2, pp. 1–6, 2009.[5] K. L. Meyers, M. W. Ohland, A. L. Pawley, S. E. Silliman, and K. A. Smith, “Factors relating to engineering identity,” Glob. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 119–131, 2012.[6] H. M. Matusovich, R. A. Streveler, and R. L. Miller, “Why do students choose engineering? A qualitative, longitudinal investigation of students’ motivational values,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 289–303, 2010.[7] K. L. Tonso, Student engineers and engineer identity: Campus engineer identities as figured world, vol. 1, no
Conference Session
Communication Across the Divisions I: Communication in Engineering Disciplines
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alyssa Catherine Taylor, University of Washington; Stephanie Pulford, Center for Engineering Learning and Teaching (CELT)
Tagged Divisions
Civil Engineering, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
of their qualitative experiences and translate that meaning intodesign. Future work will include designing a larger constellation of these communication designlearning experiences for students during their senior capstone.Bibliography1. Sheridan, K. M. Envision and Observe: Using the Studio Thinking Framework for Learning and Teaching in Digital Arts. Mind, Brain, Educ. 5, 19–26 (2011).2. Hetland, L., Winner, E., Veenema, S. & Sheridan, K. M. Studio Thinking 2: The Real Benefits Of Studio Art Education. 164 (Teachers College Press, 2013).3. Sandell, R., Education, A., Burton, J. M. & Beudert, L. What Excellent Visual Arts Teaching Looks Like. Advocacy White Pap. Art Educ. (2009).4. Percy, C. critical
Conference Session
Explorations in Mechanics Pedagogy
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
William Graves P.E., U.S. Military Academy; Young Hwan Chun, U.S. Military Academy; James Ledlie Klosky P.E., U.S. Military Academy; Brock E. Barry P.E., U.S. Military Academy
Tagged Divisions
Mechanics
., “Schemas versus mental models in human memory,” In Modelling Cognition edited by P. Morris, Wiley, NewYork, pp. 187-197, 19873. Katona, G., 1901-1981. Organizing and memorizing; studies in the psychology of learning and teaching, New York, Columbia university press, 1940.4. Davis, K., Improving Motivation and Knowledge Retention with Repeatable Low-Stakes Quizzing, Compendium of Technical Papers of the 2009 Annual Conference and Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education, Austin, Texas, June 14-17, 2009.5. Handlesman, J., D. Ebert-May, R. Beichner, P. Burns, A. Chang, R. DeHaan, J. Gentile, S. Lauffer, J. Steward, S. M. Tilghman, and W. B. Wood, “Scientific Teaching,” Science, 304 (5670), pp. 521-522, 2004.6
Conference Session
Technical Session III
Collection
2018 FYEE Conference
Authors
Jack Bringardner, New York University; Gunter W. Georgi, NYU’s Tandon School of Engineering; Victoria Bill, NYU Tandon School of Engineering
Tagged Topics
FYEE Conference Sessions
,instructional videos, and mentorship are critical to the success of open-ended projects.The next major focus of the first-year engineering program is develop a mentorship program tosupport course projects. When students propose their own ideas, it helps to have a mechanismthat finds experts to support their project. Teaching assistants with experience in the proposedareas are a valuable resource to guide students from their conceptual design to productdevelopment. Further research is needed to understand and improve the role of the mentors foreach RAD project.References [1] Walsh, D., (2004) A Freshman Design Experience Using Rapid Prototyping. In 2004 ASEE Annual Conference proceedings. [2] Meyers, K., & Conner, B. P., & Morgan, A. S
Conference Session
Technical Session VI
Collection
2018 FYEE Conference
Authors
Rod Blaine Foist, California Baptist University; Xuping Xu, California Baptist University; Timothy Gage, California Baptist University; Seth Truitt, California Baptist University; Matthias Hans Schmidt
Tagged Topics
FYEE Conference Sessions
. Electrical and Computer Engineering, Gordon & Jill Bourns[2] Sheppard, S., et al., Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of College of Engineering, California Baptist University, the Field. Jossey-Bass, 2009. Seth.Truitt@calbaptist.edu[3] Sheppard, S., et al., Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field. Jossey-Bass, 2009, Book Highlights, Matthias Schmidt Student (and IEEE student club http://archive.carnegiefoundation.org/pdfs/elibrary/elibrary_pdf_769. president), Electrical and Computer Engineering, Gordon & pdf; see Figures 1 and 2 on pages 9-10. Jill Bourns College of Engineering
Conference Session
Technical Session III
Collection
2018 FYEE Conference
Authors
Suzanne Keilson, Loyola University Maryland; Lynne C Elkes, Loyola University Maryland
Tagged Topics
FYEE Conference Sessions
question of commodities, an S-curve ofdevelopment with creative destruction, and the Ehrlich-Simon bet. The conclusion of themodule requires students to write a reflective essay where they analyze the presentations moreformally for the intended audience, author biases, and methodologies. The students are asked tofind one thing they agree with and disagree with on both sides of the debate. Current students(2017) seem to readily accept ecological concerns about consumerism and show a desire forfairness and equity. This author believes those attitudes are well established in current K-12education. This provides a nice frame, as time allows, to introduce principles from sustainabilityengineering and design, which are intended to analyze rigorously the
Collection
2019 CIEC
Authors
Nicholas Hempenius; Te-Shun Chou; Lee Toderick
[11] Joreome Buvat, Ramya Puttur, Mike Turner, and Marisa Slatter. 2017. Cybersecurity Talent the Big Gap in Cyber Protection Eight Recommendations for How Organizations Can Bridge the Cybersecurity Talent Gab. (July 2017). Retrieved June 7, 2018 from https://www.capgemini.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/the- cybersecurity-talent-gap-v8_web.pdf[12] Masas, S., Hallaq, B., and Maennel, O. 2017. Obtaining Better Metrics for Complex Serious Games Within Virtualised Simulation Environments. In European Conference on Games Based Learning. Academic Conferences International Limited, United Kingdom, Reading, 428-434.[13] National Cyber Foundation. 2016. Secure and Trustworth Cyberspace (SaTC) FY 2016 NSF Budget Request to
Conference Session
ABET Accreditation of Multidisciplinary Programs
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Robert Grondin, Arizona State University; Darryl Morrell, Arizona State University
Tagged Divisions
Multidisciplinary Engineering
elective none of which is humanities & social restricted to technical sciences)* Includes 23 hours of upper division and EGR 225, EGR 226 and EGR 235.References 1. One University in Many Places: Transitional Design to Twenty-First Century Excellence www.asu.edu/president/univdesign/OneUniversity80305.ppt 2. C. Roberts, D. Morrell, R. Grondin, C.-Y. Kuo, R. Hinks, S. Danielson, and M. Henderson, “Developing a Multidisciplinary Engineering Program at Arizona State University’s East Campus,” 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Portland, June 2005 3. Annette
Conference Session
Capstone Design I
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Katja Holtta-Otto, University Of Massachusetts-Dartmouth; Pia Helminen, Helsinki University of Technology (TKK); Kalevi Ekman, Helsinki University of Technology (TKK); Thomas Roemer, University of California-San Diego
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
University. This experience enabled usto choose the teaching principles, namely different aspects of problem based learning that bestimprove student learning and motivation. The pilot program of dispersed product developmentteams was a success and is continuing today. We highly recommend similar programs to otherschools as well.Bibliography1. Meier, M. Best practice in product design: concept outlines and experiences in project-oriented product design education. International Journal of Engineering Education. Vol 19. No 5. pp. 338–345.2. Eppinger, S. D. and Kressy, M. S. 2002. Interdisciplinary product development education at MIT and RISD. Design Management Journal. Summer 2002. pp. 58–61.3. de Graaf, E. and Kolmos, A. 2003
Conference Session
Knowing Our Students, Part 2
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ozgur Eris, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Debbie Chachra, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Helen Chen, Stanford University; Camelia Rosca, Boston College; Larry Ludlow, Boston College; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University; Krista Donaldson, Stanford University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Engineering Education (CAEE). Page 12.94.11Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography[1] Huang, G., Taddese, N., Walter, E. Entry and Persistence of Women and Minorities in College Science and Engineering Education. NCES 2000-601. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics, 2000.[2] Besterfield-Sacre, M.E., Atman, C.J., Shuman, L.J. "How freshman attitudes change in the first year," ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, vol. 1, pp
Conference Session
Engineering Management Program Management
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John Elson, National University; Shekar Viswanathan, National University; Howard Evans, National University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Management
for optimum learning? Wecall on engineering educators to continue their efforts to develop a curriculum theory for the fieldof engineering that will guide the discipline in optimizing the process of designing the bestcurriculum for the U.S. engineers of the future. References 1. Blanchard,Benjamin S. and Fabrycky, Wolter J. Systems Engineering and Analysis. 4 ed. Prentice Hall International Series in Industrial and Systems Engineering. W.J. Fabrycky and J.H. Mize. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2006. 2. Kotnour, Timothy, and John V. Farr. "Engineering Management: Past, Present, and Future." Engineering Management Journal 17, no. 1 (2005): 15-26. 3. Farr
Conference Session
Emerging Trends in Engineering Education Poster Session
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Chell Roberts, Arizona State University; Senay Purzer; Darryl Morrell; Mark Henderson, Arizona State University; Scott Danielson, Arizona State University; Nancy Cooke, Arizona State University
. Consequently, they spentmost of their time on Project Realization and the least amount of time on Alternative Solutions.The team made 16 iterations between Problem Scoping and Alternative Solution stages to clarify Page 12.89.7the problem. Figure 3 shows these iterations in a timeline. The behavior of this team is similar tothe expert designers’ behavior reported by Dwarakanath, S. and Blessing22 who found that expertdesigners entered the searching for concepts (alternative solutions) phase earlier but had morestep backs to the clarification of the task in their proceedings. Experts started by brainstormingalternative solutions and then systematically
Conference Session
FPD11 -- Multidisciplinary Experiences
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mehrube Mehrubeoglu, Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi; Lifford McLauchlan, Texas A&M University-Kingsville
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
that Group 1 received. The objectives, theory, and otherinformation have been omitted in the interest of space.“… with the CIPHER encode the following message. Also give the across R3 voltage roundedto the nearest whole number and encode the value at the end of the phraseTHE CIRCUIT PARAMETERS ARE AS FOLLOWS, R4 3, R2 6, R3 9, VS 30. R2 ANDR3 ARE IN PARALLEL AND THEIR COMBINATION IS IN SERIES WITH R4 ANDTHIS IS THEN IN SERIES WITH VS. THE VOLTAGE ACROSS R3 ISCIPHER A a) D K Z 7 V d) c) S . e) C 9 P G > <
Conference Session
Design Methodolgy
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jose Salinas, United States Military Academy; Bobby Crawford, USMA; Tony Jones, USMA
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
0% engineering and new technologies without the aid of 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 formal instruction. Engineering &Technology Goals Page 12.568.11Figure 8: End of Course Survey Data for ME450The best indication of the success of ME450’s hands-on approach to
Conference Session
Implementing the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge into Courses and Curricula
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kevin Sutterer, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; James Hanson, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; John Aidoo, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Civil Engineering
module can benefit them professionally.ReferencesABET, 2006, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs: Effective for Evaluations During the 2007-2008Accreditation Cycle,” Engineering Accreditation Commission, retrieved January 17, 2007 fromwww.abet.org/forms.shtml .ASCE, 2004, “Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century: Preparing the Civil Engineer for theFuture,” Body of Knowledge Committee of the Committee on Academic Prerequisites for Professional Practice,retrieved January 17, 2007 from www.asce.org/professional/educ/bodyofknowledge.cfm .Covey, S. R., 1989, The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People: Restoring the Character Ethic, Simon andSchuster, New York, NY, 340 p.Downing, C. G., 2001, “Essential Non-Technical
Conference Session
Developing New Instrumentation
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sean Brennan, Pennsylvania State University
Tagged Divisions
Instrumentation
. 70-73, 2004.3. B. Wayne Bequette, "A laptop-based studio course for process control," IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 25,1, pp. 45-49, 2005.4. Dennis S. Bernstein, "The Quanser DC Motor Control Trainer," IEEE Control Systems Magazine,3, pp. 90-93, 2005.5. Peter J. Gawthrop and Euan McGookin, "A LEGO-Based Control Experiment," IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 24,5, pp. 43-56, 2004.6. B.S. Heck, N.S. Clements, and A.A. Ferri, "A LEGO Experiment for Embedded Control System Design," IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 24,5, pp. 61-64, 2004.7. K.H. Lundberg, K.A. Lilienkamp, and G. Marsden, "Low-Cost Magnetic Levitation Project Kits," IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 24,5, pp. 65-69, 2004.8
Conference Session
Teaching Ethics II
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Richard Freeman, Valparaiso University; Peter Johnson, Valparaiso University; Kenneth Leitch, Valparaiso University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
301 Spring 2006 Ethics Paper Assignment Engineering Ethics Paper Due Wednesday, April 12, 2006Each person has been randomly assigned to a group. Each group has been assigned onecase. The group is to review the case, using the NCEES Model Rules of ProfessionalConduct, and at least one engineering society’s Codes of Ethics to form an opinion.The group will act as a Board of Ethical Review and develop an opinion (ruling) on theengineer’s behavior. The group will write a three to five page paper (12 pt, doublespaced, 1 inch margins) briefly describing the case, stating and answering the majorquestion(s), highlighting any additional ethical questions that may appear in the case, andstating