people who motivated you to engineering fields?Question 4-9 What do you think about the most effective assessment method(s) to verify student learning during the camp?Question 4-10 What do you think about the most effective team forming method(s)?Question 4-11 Can you state a unique YESTexas camp feature different than other usual summer camps? Page 15.154.5Improvements in camp application and participant selection. The application form wasimproved to comply with the requirements of the external funding agency and to enhance theselection process. Demographic, educational and career
for the greatly shortened version (C to G).At C, speed is vC (use VC for ease of entry into the spreadsheet).1. For each segment of the sled run, create a Free Body Diagram (FBD). Forces to be considered include weight (mg), normal force (n), friction force (fk = µkn), and resistive force (R (=0.5DρAv2)). The “segments” are CD, DE, EF, and FG. For CD, use an s, y coordinate system: s along the direction of motion and y perpendicularly up from the surface of the sled run. For the curved sections, use an s, r coordinate system, with s along the direction of motion and r radially outward from the center of curvature.2. Use the FBDs to derive – for each segment - algebraic expressions for n, fk, R, and centripetal acceleration; and an
limit choices ultimately determine the performance of thecontrol chart. In this paper, we will demonstrate how with some basic knowledge of geometric,normal, and chi-square random variables, a student can learn to construct X-bar and S controlcharts that will have specified properties in terms of performance. In evaluating control charts,one is usually concerned with the false alarm rate (how frequently does the chart erroneouslysignal if the monitored process is on target?) and the detection rate (how quickly does the chartsignal if the monitored process is not on target?). Using the simple tools proposed in this paper,the designer of a control chart can determine the sample size and control limits required toestablish a desired false alarm
Re ?/ u dt 8v dv C Re ?/ D v/g dt 8vEquation (12) subject to initial conditions below: x ( 0) ? 0 y ( 0) ? 0 (13) u(0) ? V0 cos s v (0) ? V0 sin sMake the system of non-linear, time dependent, ordinary differential equations, whichdescribes the flight of the golf ball. In equation (13) V0 is the launching speed
W orkshop Assessment by Participants Dem onstration Classes Labs 2,3,4: Practice Classes S-5: Learning O bjectives S-8: Interpersonal Rapport S-6: Organizing a Class Lab 1: O bjectives S-2: Priciples of Teaching Activity S-1: Learning to Teach S-7: Speaking & W riting S-4: Learning Styles S-10: Teaching with Technology S-9: Classroom Assessm ent S-8: Q uestioning S-3: Teaching Assessm ent Ice-Breaker Reception S-11
systems areas including the design andanalysis of such systems; (o) a knowledge of contemporary analytical, computational, andexperimental practices; (p) a competence in experimental design, data collection, and dataanalysis; (q) a competence in the use of computational tools; (r) a knowledge of chemistry; and(s) knowledge of calculus-based physics.Under the criteria (a-s), Mechanical Engineering Faculties at AAMU are being challenged torevise the course content, depth and perspectives of the engineering curriculum. To ensure thequality of the outcome based mechanical engineering program, faculties adopted a systemapproach, denoted by the acronym SEAARK for instruction and teaching. SEAARK stands forKnowledge, Repetition, Application, Analysis
todefense/reversal, minimization, acceptance, and adaptation.11 Other studies have employed theMiville-Guzman Universality-Diversity Scale—Short form (MGUDS-S), which uses affective,behavioral, and cognitive subscales to measure an individual’s openness to and appreciation ofcultural diversity.12 This paper, on the other hand, opens up a new line of research by exploringwhether Cultural Intelligence (CQ) may serve as yet another useful instrument for assessingvarious aspects of cross-cultural competence among engineering students and professionals.Cultural IntelligenceResearch based on the Cultural Intelligence (CQ) framework has proliferated in recent years.13However, it has attracted relatively little attention in the engineering education
elements are present in a sample. Page 25.1061.4 Figure 3. Schematic illustrating SEM operation. An additional spectroscopic measurement in the bottom-up fabrication lab includes UV-VIS spectroscopy. In these measurements, a spectrophotometer (Figure 4) sends electromagneticradiation in the visible spectrum through a sample (I0)11. This radiation passes through thesample (IT) reaching a detector that generates a signal indicating the wavelength(s) of lightabsorbed by the sample or the percent of light transmitted through the sample11
& Exposition Copyright , American Society for Engineering Educationthen the equations of motion become d 2w i (∆x )4 = [ w i −2 − 4 w i −1 + 6 w i − 4 w i +1 + w i+2 ] + f (x i , τ) (13) dτ2 EINow define velocities as vi = dwi/dτ and the column vectors w = [w1 w2 . . .w8]T andv = [v1 v2 . . . v8]T so the resulting state variable matrix form is d w 0 I w ( ∆x ) 2 0 = + dτ v - S 0 v EI f
) Golf Club Lab 0 .2 d e v ice channe ls s am p le s s a m pl ing ra te 1 2 :3 4 0 9 6 .0 0 1 0 2 4 .0 0 0 .1 windo w l o w cuto ff hig h cuto ff filte r ty p e N o ne L o wp a 1 0 .0 0 5 0 .0 0 0 .0 lo g / line a r di s pla y unit F ilte
Appendix B (Planning the Construction Plan - IPRs)Figure 4. Table of Contents of the Final Manual Page 3.5.4 4 P la n n in g P ro c e s s F a c ilita tin g P ro c e s s e s Q u a lity P la n n in g Q u a lity M a n a g e m e n t P la n C h e c k lis ts O rg a n iz a tio n a l P la n n in g R e s p o n s ib ilitie s (A c c o u n ta b ility M
science calculations and design considerations. We hypothesize that theprocess of reflection and iteration inherent to hackathon competitions will strengthen theparticipant groups’ perceived EJ skills. Finally, engineering leadership (EL) skills relate to theleadership style(s) used by individuals to lead groups of engineers to achieve a common goal. Aneffective leader exercises influence at interpersonal, team, and organizational levels, whilesimultaneously building strong relationships. We hypothesize that in the absence of a well-structured project, the need to delegate tasks among team members and develop solutionsquickly will increase the perceived EL abilities of participant groups.To frame this study, we will use the Buck Institute of
sponsor; Team behavior and tools (D&S 4.2-4.5, 4.8) 2 • Syllabus, Engr. Notebooks, Report Format, Presentation Guidelines; Background, Literature Review, Personnel, References; Allocate mfg. positions 3 • Engineering Design (D&S 1.1, 1.2, 1.4) Training • Problem Introduction by sponsors begins • Gathering Information (D&S 5.1, 5.4, 5.6, 5.9) 4 • Problem Statement – Brainstorm (Instructor/Students) • Concept Generation (D&S 6.5-6.7) 5 • Team Assignments; Description of Design, Simulation, Design Methodology, Schedule • Decision Making and Concept Selection (D&S 7.3, 7.5, 7.6) 6 • Feasibility Study, Optimization
gas and electricity later. Page 23.948.3Table 1: Measured parameters (time, Amperage, and power) at every 5C water temperatureincreaseTemperature Readings (°C ) Time Elapsed (s) Cumulative Time (s) Amperage (A) Power (W) 30 0 0 43 9331 40 1190 1190 41.5 9005.5 45 194 1384 42 9114
understand the reasons/rules 6. Disagree behind my* suggestion 7. Strongly disagree. *the tutor’s *the tutor’s 2. To what extent do you agree to the following statements 7-level scale: about student(s) interest in your* suggestions about: 1. Strongly agree a) Grammar 2. Agree b) Style 3. Somewhat agree c) Content 4. Neither agree nor disagree d) Format 5. Somewhat disagree e) Citations
/25016.[4] National Research Council, U.S. Fostering Flexibility in the Engineering Workforce. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 1990. doi: https://doi.org/10.17226/1602.[5] National Academy of Engineering, U. S. The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2004. doi: https://doi.org/10.17226/10999.[6] Y. H. Ahn, R. P. Annie, and H. Kwon, “Key competencies for US construction graduates: Industry perspective,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 123-130, 2012. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943- 5541.0000089.[7] J. McMcMasters and L. Matsch, “Desired attributes of an
Academe and Industry - Where Is the Disconnect? Dr. William R. Peterson Assistant Professor Department of Technology Management College of Technology and Innovation Arizona State University Technology Center 6075 S. WMS Campus Loop W Mesa, AZ 85212 480-727-1582 (office) 480-727-1684 (fax) AbstractIndustry still reports that the new engineering
articulate their assumptions regarding the purpose(s)of engineering education, the role of sustainability in the engineering curriculum, and therelationship between sustainability and the “ethics” and “environmental awareness” criteriaposed by the engineers’ accreditation agency (ABET 2005). Specifically, electronic dialogicjournals will be created that allow select engineering faculty to share their pedagogical ideology,to explore the relationship between the technological content that they teach and the objectivesand outcomes required by ABET, and to articulate the methods and goals they have for shapingour students’ philosophical perspectives as regards sustainability.Word count: 199
STUDENT LEARNING THROUGH CONTINUOUS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Tom C. Roberts, P.E., Shagun Sharma Kansas State UniversityIntroductionFrom Fall 1995 to Spring 2013, more than 2,650 students completed a one hour Personal & ProfessionalDevelopment course in the College of Engineering at Kansas State University. The course originatedfrom a late 1980’s series of Saturday morning professional development workshops designed for key stu-dent leaders. The workshops were combined into an elective one hour course (DEN 275) named“STARS” in the early 1990’s. Enrollments were low (10 to 15 students per semester) and decreasedwhen the university changed from semester to hourly
response receivedRECONNECTDELAY = 0 # Reconnect delay# Tank Fill Simulation ConstantsWATER_HEIGHT_ADDR = 0x0000PUMP_SPEED_ADDR = 0x0001SET_POINT_ADDR = 0x0002TANK_DIAMETER = 0.25 # Diameter of tank (m)TANK_HEIGHT = 0.3 # Height of tank (m)TAU = 25 # Time constant of out flow of tank (s)MAX_IN_FLOW = 0.5 # Maximum input flow rate to tank (kg/s)TIME_STEP = 0.1 # Simulation time step (s)PLC_MAX_PUMP_SPEED = 10000 # Maximum pump speed (PLC)PLC_MAX_WATER_HEIGHT = 10000 # Maximum water height (PLC)class App(tk.Tk):def __init__(self):tk.Tk.__init__(self)# Attributesself.adapter = Noneself.client = Noneself.t = None# App Windowself.title(’Tank Fill Modbus’)self.exiting = Falseself.log = tk.Text(self, state=’disabled’, width=80, height=24, wrap=’char
utilizedteaching methods that were customized to how people learn most efficiently. Analysis ofVariance (ANOVA) and Pearson‟s correlation were used to study the relationship betweencontent knowledge, self efficacy, cognitive level, and critical thinking level.It was found that critical thinking and self efficacy scores are positively correlated with eachother, but neither is correlated with the student‟s course grade. In addition students who statedthat they believed they would earn an „A‟ in the first year course performed significantly betterin critical thinking. Critical thinking and self efficacy scores did not have a correlation withoverall course grades, which suggests that course grades may not be the best method for definingthe quality of a
C C C C N C A A A C A C C C Student 2 C C C C C C C C C C C C A C A A Student 3 C C C C C C C C C C C C A A C A Student 4 N S C C C C A C C C C C C C S A Student 5 N C A A C C C C C C C C C C C A Student 6 C C C C C C C C C C C C A A C A Student 7 C C C C C C C C C C C C A C A A Student 8 C S C C C C N C A C C A A A A A Student 9 C C C C C C C C C C C C S C C A Student 10
impactsand sustainability, a module pre- and post-test will be performed. The tests will include wordcloud creation to ascertain common themes, as well as developing a bipolar scaling methodquestionnaire (Likert scale) to determine changes in understanding of LCA methods, uses, andimpact on engineering design. To further enhance student learning, better integration of broaderimpacts into group project requirements, with the LCA module as background material, is alsoanticipated.Sources:[1] NSPE “NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers; Code III,2d” National Society of ProfessionalEngineers. 2023 < https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics>[2] Burnley, S., Waglang, S., Longhurst, P., “Using life cycle assessment in environmentalengineering
] 1 Biology and Engineering [54] 1 Total 39* This particular publication included Electrical, Computer, Mechanical, and Civil Engineering,Civil Engineering Technology, and Modeling and Simulation Majors.NSF EffortsTo understand more about the amount of student retention efforts, the authors analyzedinformation publicly available in National Science Foundation NSF website [72], [73].Specifically, we selected two areas of funding: Scholarships in STEM network (S-STEM-Net)[73] and Broadening Participation in Engineering BPE [72]. To narrow the analysis, the criteriaused to define the starting point in our research, included the grant’s awards that had a “Startday” of January of 2020. That means work
necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.References[1] C. Singleton, C. DeBeck, J. Chung, D. McMillen, S. Craig, S. Moore, C. Hammond, J. Dwyer, M. Frydrych, O. Villadsen, R. Emerson, G.-V. Jorudan, V. Onut, S. Carruthers, A. Laurie, M. Alvarez, S. Wuttke, G. Prassions, J. Zorabedian, M. Mayne, L. Kessem, I. Gallagher and A. Eitan, "X-Force Threat Intelligence Index 2022," IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, 2022.[2] S. M. Loo and L. Babinkostova, "Cyber-Physical Systems Security Introductory Course for STEM Students," ASEE 2020 Annual Conference, 2020.[3] J. Ekong, V. Chauhan, J. Osedeme, S. Niknam and R. Nguyen, "A framework for Industry 4.0 workforce training through project-based and experiential learning approaches," ASEE Annual
low value of authors contributed to the design of the experiment as well ascontact angle from TPU (p < 0.05) suggests that the TPU films manuscript writing.are much more hydrophobic than the glass surface. Water absorption determines the amount of water uptake Referencesin a material over a period of time. Higher water absorption [1] S.-F. Chou, S. Gunaseelan, M.H.H. Kiellani, V.V.K.rate may lead to a change in surface hydrophobicity and faster Thottempudi, P. Neuenschwander, H. Nie, A review
. Brophy, “Comparing the Attributes, Activities, and Performance of Divergent, Convergent, and Combination Thinkers,” Creat. Res. J., vol. 13, no. 3–4, pp. 439–455, Oct. 2001.[4] C. Nigel, “Design cognition: Results from protocol and other empirical studies of design activity,” Des. Knowing Learn. Cogn. Des. Educ., vol. 7, pp. 9–103, 2001.[5] S. Zenios et al., Biodesign: The Process of Innovating Medical Technologies, 1 edition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2009.[6] P. Rowe, Design thinking. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987.[7] D. G. Jansson and S. M. Smith, “Design fixation,” Des. Stud., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 3–11, 1991.[8] S. Isaksen and J. Gaulin, “A Reexamination of Brainstorming Research: Implications
, Oct. 1994.[5] H. H. Garrison and S. A. Gerbi, "Education and employment patters of US Ph.D.'s in the biomedical sciences," The FASEB Journal, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 139-148, Feb. 1998.[6] G. M. Pion, The early career progress of NRSA predoctoral trainees and fellows. Bethesda, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, 2001.[7] G. Pion and I.-P. Martin, "Bridging postdoctoral training and a faculty position: Initial outcomes of the Burroughs Wellcome Fund Career Awards in the biomedical sciences," Academic Medicine, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 177-186, Feb. 2003.[8] R. St Clair, T. Hutto, C. MacBeth, W. Newstetter, N. A. McCarty, and J. Melkers, "The "new normal
analytic techniques areexcellent. However, while the analysis is appropriate for undergraduates, many of theapplications are focused on higher-level structural design. There are two, much older, referencesonline that offer a more focused undergraduate presentation, the 1906 “Text Book on GraphicalStatics” 4, a thesis for the “Degree of Civil Engineer” (M.S.) from the University of Illinois, byCharles Wesley Malcom and the “Graphical Analysis, A textbook on Graphic Statics"5, byWilliam S. Wolfe, 1921. Both books look more at forces and equilibrium than design, makingthem more appropriate for topics in Statics for undergraduate mechanical and civil engineeringstudents. Additionally, a detailed explanation and illustrations of force and funicular
and concurrentinstructional groups will serve as the independent variables; while the dependent variables areengineering concept knowledge, FEA skills scores, and subjective cognitive load scores.Pre-Test: FEA Software Skill and Engineering Concepts Students will first complete a pre-test to identify their baseline FEA software skills andknowledge of FEM. Figure 1 shows an example of a sample pre-test question where thedeflection values need to be determined for an axially loaded steel plate, by means of FEM andFEA software utilizing beam elements.6 Figure 1. Pre-test sample question.6 Reprinted from Finite element analysis: theory and application with ANSYS, (p. 33), S., Moaveni, 2015, Pearson.Group 1: Simultaneous