follows [3]: 1. The Cloud Provider signs VM with its own private key. 2. The Cloud Provider sends the signed VM to the Verification Engine. 3. The Cloud Provider sends the public key to the Cloud Consumer. 4. The Cloud Consumer sends the public key to the Verification Engine. 5. The Verification Engine verifies the authentication of VM template. Figure 2. VM template authentication using digital signaturesThe potential issues of this approach are: a) The Cloud Provider needs to protect private key from unauthorized use and disclosure. b) The Cloud Provider needs to provide its own public key in a trusted way to each Cloud Consumer. c) The Cloud Consumer needs to protect private key from
, D. R. Brodeur, and K. Edström, Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach, 2nd Ed. Springer International Publishing, 2014.[6] P. Phyllis, “Proposal to add a Minor in Engineering Leadership Development,” Maryland, 2007.[7] R. J. Schuhmann, “Engineering Leadership Education – The Search for Definition and a Curricular Approach,” J. STEM Education, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 61–69, 2010.[8] NSPE, “NSPE Position Statement No . 1752 — Engineering Education Outcomes,” National Society of Professional Engineers, 2010. [Online]. Available: http://www.nspe.org/sites/default/files/resources/GR downloadables/Engineering_Education_Outcomes.pdf. [Accessed: 01-Dec-2014].[9] R. Graham, E. Crawley, B. R. Mendelsohn, W. Paper, B. M. Gordon, M
information in order to reachvalid conclusions” 1 and is similar to the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET) criteria b. Likewise, problem analysis is defined by the CEAB as the “ability to useappropriate knowledge and skills to identify, formulate, analyze, and solve complex engineeringproblems in order to reach substantiated conclusions”1 and is similar to ABET criteria e. Theresearch team sought to answer the following questions: 1. What are the specific skills/behaviours/attitudes that are important for assessing investigation? 2. What are the specific skills/behaviours/attitudes that are important for assessing problem analysis?This study is part of a larger research project which seeks to develop non-discipline
events. The result was robotteams with four members designing/redesigning more complex robots and doing more testing.Organization of the EventsThe detailed competition guidelines are provided in Appendix B. The six events made varied useof different capabilities. Line sensing was essential for the Lane Follower and Line Followerevents. Each of these events required a different set of programming logic to excel. Carefulmechanical design was required for the Tug of War, Cross Country, and Hill Climb events.Teams that chose to participate in multiple events had the added challenge of satisfying multipleobjectives. Knowledge of electrical interfacing and programming was recognized by theRhythmic gymnastics event. Event 1 - Lane Follower
” educationefforts, “to investigate empirically the ways in which college students bring knowledgeand experiences together so that educators can better understand undergraduate studentlearning and more intentionally promote the integration of learning.” Barber identifiedthree distinct types of integration of learning: (a) connection, the discovery of a similaritybetween ideas that themselves remain distinctive; (b) application, the use of knowledgefrom one context in another; and (c) synthesis, the creation of new knowledge bycombining insights.What have been the driving forces behind these interdisciplinary and integrativeinitiatives? At the beginning of the 20th century, a traditional liberal arts educationtypically included courses in sciences, social
Appendix B: Expectationsfor Working with Collaborators and Need Experts).Examples of Accessible Design ProjectsHere we describe three example projects: Climbing Higher, e-NABLE Device and Research, andWild Thing Challenge and show examples of student-built prototypes (Fig. 1). To supportprototyping and best practices, students have access to a makerspace and are mentored by facultyand an independent design consultant. • Climbing Higher. Accessible climbing wall for adults with cognitive disabilities, in collaboration with Outdoors for All, a national organization that provides accessible recreational activities [17]. The team designed thermochromatic holds that change color when held by a climber in order to track progress
illustrate the difference between contextual problems and those lacking context,consider a potential mechanics of materials problem: A shaft is subjected to the torque shown. Find A the shear stress developed in the shaft and the angle of twist at point A relative to point B. B Figure 1 A basic torsional shear stress problem in mechanics of materialsThe problem does not tell the students anything about the source of the torque, the likely use ofthe shaft, or anything else that might allow then to place some context on why it might bevaluable to know the shear stress or angle of twist. Even if the
Mass transfer lab (brewing coffee; factorial design)7 Connections to future courses Mass transfer lab, continuedThe most important feature of this half of the course is the structure of the laboratoryassignments. The laboratory prompts are kept to about ½ page in length, introducing a problemor concept and tasking students to develop a hypothesis, design and conduct an experiment,analyze data, and discuss the implication of the results. A sample assignment is provided inAppendix B. Each design group meets with the course instructor once a week outside of class fora 15-minute meeting to discuss the previous and upcoming lab and address group dynamicsconcerns. (7)A group
assignments are important to learning.Students rated their agreement with this statement at 4.8/5. Thus, the laboratory instilled anunderstanding of the importance of hands-on learning in the students.In Figure 3(b) student assessment of the effectiveness of laboratory exercises in achieving theiracademic goals is shown. This data is a composite response from a number of statementsincluding: S5) The Rocket lab increased my belief that testing and revision are important. S6) The statistics lab increased my understanding of statistics. S7) The circuit and temperature lab helped me better understand electrical circuit testing equipment. S8) The Drill/Tool Dissection lab increased my understanding of the relationship
Session 3620 Job Scheduling in Cluster Computing: A Student Project Hassan Rajaei, Mohammad B. Dadfar Department of Computer Science Bowling Green State University Bowling Green, Ohio 43403 Phone: (419)372-2337 Fax: (419)372-8061 {rajaei, dadfar}@cs.bgsu.eduAbstractCluster computing has become widespread by utilizing COTS (Commercial-Off-The-Shelf) PCs,a high-speed network, and Linux operating system. This simple configuration of multiprocessorsystem can
problems issues Course Learning Objectives A B C D E F G H I J K Level 1: Knowledge 1.1 Design Methods & Processes X X X X X
course of the semester. Each major step in the construction of the device is devolvedinto a self-contained module which provides a hands-on tool for the teaching of nanoscalemechanics concepts. a) b) Figure 2. Side (a) and top (b) views of the microfluidic device constructed and tested during the course(before membrane formation). The surface modified silver coated portion of the substrate can be seen in the bottom half of image (b).This lab was inspired by the research on “virtual walls” in microfluidic devices by Beebe andMoore10,11 as well as the educational nanotechnology laboratories created by the University ofWisconsin
. TORGteam leaders are identified, responsibilities of each team member aredefined, etc.)Budget/Schedule - If appropriate, a project budget and schedule are clearly B/Sdescribed using appropriate tools (e.g. Gantt chart, spreadsheet, etc.) Page 25.223.4 Table 1 Performance Criteria for Oral Presentationsperformance criterion, to range from 0 to 3, which can be assigned by the course instructor basedon the importance of that criterion to the particular project. The rating given for eachperformance criterion is multiplied by the weighting factor, and then the weighted scores aresummed over all the criteria to
, based upon two years of working with the Research Page 7.343.8 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationSupport Group at Purdue University, that such groups can have a positive effect not only uponthe attrition rate of doctoral students at Purdue, but upon attrition rates nationwide.Bibliography1. Lovitts, B. E. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.2. Bowen, W. G., & Rudenstine, N. L
Origins of Young Adult Environmental Behavior. Psychological science, 29(5), 679-687.[22] Lawton, J., (2019). Poverty a problem in St. Lawrence County; 29% of kids live below poverty line. North Country This week, Monday, April 22, 2019. Accessed 9/20,2020 at https://www.northcountrynow.com/b U.S.iness/poverty-problem-st-lawrence-county-29-kids-live- below-povert-line- 0257011#:~:text=A%20family%20of%20three%20earning%20%2421%2C330%20or%20less%20is %20considered%20impoverished.&text=According%20to%20a%20report%20from%20the%20St.,C ounty%20residents%20live%20in%20poverty.[23] SERC (Science Education Resource Center; nd). Why use the Campus as a Living Laboratory? Pedagogy in Action, the SERC portal for Educators
change.Dr. Abhik Roy, West Virginia University Abhik Roy is a professor educational psychology in the Department of Learning Sciences & Human Development (https://lshd.wvu.edu/) within the College of Education & Human Services at West Virginia University. Dr. Roy holds a Ph.D. in Program Evaluation with expertise in data science, visualization, and social network analysis and is an evaluator on multiple federal grants spanning both the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health. He currently conducts research in (a) the use of machine learning to evaluate programs, (b) using predictive networks to assess change, and (c) deep learning architectures for text classification
through Service basedLearning. Proceedings of the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference, Seattle, WA.10) Camacho, M. M., & Lord, S. M. (2011, October). " Microaggressions" inengineering education: Climate for Asian, Latina and White women. In Frontiers inEducation Conference (FIE), 2011 (pp. S3H‐1). IEEE.11) Davies, A., Ramsay, J., Lindfield, H., & Couperthwaite, J. (2005). Building learningcommunities: foundations for good practice. British Journal of EducationalTechnology, 36, 615–628.12) Seron, C., Silbey, S.S., Cech, E., and Rubineau, B. (2015). Persistence is Cultural:Professional Socialization and the Reproduction of Sex Segregation. Work andOccupations, 43(2), 178-214.13) Klingbeil, N.W., High, K.A, Keller, M.W., White, I.M., Brummel, B.J
Paper ID #16964Leadership in Practice: A Model for Building Strong Academic Foundationsin a Residential Learning CommunityMs. Noel Kathleen Hennessey, The University of Arizona Noel Hennessey is the Coordinator for Outreach, Recruitment and Retention in the College of Engineer- ing at the University of Arizona. She is responsible for first-year experience through residential education, student development and retention, and designing outreach activities and events for undergraduate recruit- ment. Noel earned a Master of Arts degree in Higher Education from the University of Arizona in 2015 and is currently pursuing a
. , http://www-cdr.stanford.edu/images/Dissection/dissphil.pdf4. Brown, A. and Ollis, D. , “Team Teaching: A Freshman Engineering Rhetoric and Laboratory”, ASEE proceedings, 19965. Brown, A., Luyendyk, S. and Ollis, D.F., “Implementing an English and Engineering Collaboration,” in Liberal Education in Twenty-First Century Engineering: Responses to ABET/EC2000 Criteria, (eds: Ollis, D.S., Neeley, K.A., and Luegenbiehl, H.C., Peter Lang Publishers, New York, NY, pp. 270-279.6. Kennedy, A., Ollis, D., and Brent, R, , “Cross-College Collaboration to Enhance Spanish Instruction and Learning,” Proceedings of ASEE Annual conference, 2005.7. Laffitte, B., Ollis, D., and Brent, R.,, “Cross-College Collaboration of Engineering with Industrial
of Computing Sciences in Colleges, pp. 274-284, 2005.18. Holly Patterson-McNeill and Carol L. Binkerd, “Resources for Using Lego Mindstorms,” Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, pp. 48-55, 2001.19. Pamela B. Lawhead et al., “A Road Map for Teaching Introductory Programming Using LEGO Mindstorms Robots,” in ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, vol. 35, New York, 2003, pp. 191-201.20. Madeleine Schep and Nieves McNulty, “Use of Lego Mindstorm Kits in Introductory Programming Classes: A Tutorial,” Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, pp. 323-327, 2002.21. Myles F. McNally, “Walking the Grid: Robotics in CS2,” in ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 165 Proceedings of the 8th Austalian conference on Computing education
Various Sizes,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 565–589, 2012.[10] S. W. Rogers and R. K. Goktas, “Exploring Engineering Graduate Student Research Proficiency with Student Surveys,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 263– 278, 2010.[11] J. P. Kotter, Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press, 2012.[12] J. A. Gambatese, A. A. Karakhan, and D. R. Simmons, “Development of a Workforce Sustainability Model for Construction,” The Center for Construction Research and Training, 2019.[13] T. M. Evans, L. Bira, J. B. Gastelum, L. T. Weiss, and N. L. Vanderford, “Evidence for a mental health crisis in graduate education,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 282– 284, 2018
Paper ID #13086A Concise Antennas Course based on a Single Semester of ElectromagneticsPreparationDr. Steven S. Holland, Milwaukee School of Engineering Steven S. Holland (M ’13) was born in Chicago, IL, in 1984. He received the B.S. degree in electrical engineering from the Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE), Milwaukee, WI, in 2006, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical and computer engineering from the University of Massachusetts Amherst, in 2008 and 2011 respectively. From 2006 to 2011, he was a Research Assistant working in the Antennas and Propagation Laboratory (APLab), Department of Electrical and Computer
Paper ID #11883Using a Blended Learning Format to Extend the Influence of a TechnologicalLiteracy CourseDr. William R Loendorf, Eastern Washington University William R. Loendorf is a Full Professor, Emeritus of Engineering & Design at Eastern Washington Uni- versity. He obtained his B.Sc. in Engineering Science at the University of Wisconsin - Parkside, M.S. in Electrical Engineering at Colorado State University, M.B.A. at the Lake Forest Graduate School of Management, and Ph.D. in Engineering Management at Walden University. He holds a Professional En- gineer license and has 30 years of industrial experience as an
examination of volitional personality change,” Journal of Research in Personality, vol 85, 2020.[16] A. Hira, C. Beebe, K. R. Maxey, and M. M. Hynes, “ “But, what do you want me to teach?”: Best practices for teaching in educational makerspaces (RTP),” in Proceedings, 2018 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2018, Salt Lake City, UT.[17] B. S. Robinson, N. Hawkins, J. Lewis, and J. C. Foreman, “Creation, development, and delivery of a new interactive first-year introduction to engineering course,” in Proceedings, 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2019, Tampa, FL.
cross walking techniques continue to help us make progress while providing us withthe flexibility to adapt to rapid changes in the volatile environment.Bibliography1. M. Bakia, “The Cost of Computers in Classrooms: Data from Developing Countries.” Mimeograph, Page 13.39.14Washington: The World Bank. 2000.2. E. Brewer, M. Demmer, B. Du, M. Ho, M. Kam, S. Nedevschi, J. Pal, R. Patra, S. Surana, K. Fall, “The Case forTechnology in Developing Regions,” IEEE Computer Society, June 2005.3. A. Cawthera, “Computers in Secondary Schools in Developing Countries: Costs and Other Issues” (2001)http://www.dfid.gov.uk/Pubs/files/computersinsecschoolsedpaper43
evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.6. Patton, M.Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.7. Agresti, A., & Finlay, B. Statistical methods for the social sciences (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.8. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research (2 ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Page 24.21.16
. (See the Appendix for an example controllerimplementation).7. Student SurveyOne of the primary goals of our class was to introduce students to the potential pitfalls faced wheninterfacing with hardware, via autonomous controller design and implementation. The design of aneffective and robust controller essentially involves two stages: a) develop an algorithm that can solve theproblem at hand, and b) augment this algorithm with “safety” checks that cope with sensor/effectornoise, and subroutines that either avoid or recover from potentially dangerous situations (e.g. gettingstuck against a wall). Even the simplest control problem posed to the students required them to dealwith the “imperfections” inherent in the hardware. For most students
ratio one means a student successfully completes courses on thevery first attempt. It provides a comparison measure for those students repeating classes Page 25.732.13multiple times for earning a (D)FW where only grades of A,B or C are acceptable tomove on. Student grades were tracked through second calculus and the second physics –the engineering preparatory courses. Based on placement, students may take up to 4math classes in completing the first two years of the curriculum: college algebra, collegetrigonometry, a combined algebra/trigonometry course, calculus I and calculus III. Forphysics, students could start in either Physics 1100 or
. Page 15.77.16References1. Lynn, L. and Salzman, H. “The ‘New’ Globalization of Engineering: How the Offshoring of Advanced Engineering Affects Competitiveness and Development”, 21st European Group for Organizational Studies (EGOS) Colloquium: “Unlocking Organizations”, Berlin, June 2005.2. Newberry, B. “Engineering globalization: Oxymoron or opportunity?”, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, Vol. 24, Issue 3, Fall 2005, 8-15.3. Lohmann, J.R., Rollins, H.A., and Hoey, J.J. “Defining, developing, and assessing global competence in engineers”, European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 31, No. 1, March 2006, 119-131.4. Anderson, A. “Preparing engineering students to work in a global environment to co
Design Projects Addressed by Student Design Teams, Journalof Engineering Education, January, 2001, pp. 69-74.6 See reference #17 Miller, R. H. and B. M. Olds, A Model Curriculum for a Capstone Course in Multidisciplinary EngineeringDesign, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 83, No. 4, 1994, pp. 311-316.8 Farr, John V., Marc A. Lee, Richard A. Metro and James P. Sutton, Using a Systematic Engineering DesignProcess to Conduct Undergraduate Engineering Management Capstone Processes, Journal of EngineeringEducation, April, 2001, pp. 193-197. Page 9.350.16 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education