as a whole?How can resources be synergistically integrated to support such an effort? What are the majorchallenges or barriers present that must be overcome in order to create such a system?In response to these questions, they present a concept map to explore how faculty educationaldevelopment could support and greatly enhance an entire system revolving around faculty Page 15.975.4development in teaching and learning. Utilizing and reflecting upon the literature, major issuesconsidered that relate to the questions above include various roles in the higher educationengineering community; relationships between educational research, student
Procedure Experimental Group Control Group Pre-Test Heat transfer concept questions Sequential and Emergent The Nature of Science (with Processes (with reflection reflection prompts); prompts); Diffusion example with no Training Module Diffusion as an example of mention of emergent processes an emergent process (with (with reflection prompts) reflection prompts) Diffusion concept questionsTest for
team might be delayed until a second team is formed and has begun to develop its own synergy. This timing will provide students with an ability to compare differences in team structure and be able to better understand what constitutes a functioning first team. In addition, the students will be better able to apply this information to make their second team more effective. About two weeks after the second team is formed is an appropriate time to do the assessment to maximize both reflective and application processes. 3. Administer the first assessment somewhere between a half and two-thirds of the way through a project. This will provide an opportunity for each team to set goals and develop
teamwork. The teams working on these projects are diverse in major, discipline, education level, gender and ethnicity. 8. Enhance the ability of students to communicate their ideas/solutions effectively to both technical and non-technical people: Students are required to write a technical report, a reflection paper and to present their experiences and/or work to the campus community or a specific class. Furthermore, students are required to write reflections as part of the cultural immersion workshop on non-technical issues. Students are required to submit electronic weekly status reports to the ETHOS director while participating in their service-placements. In most cases, students are required to speak
classroomenvironment was restructured to support collaborative and reflective learning, and provideopportunities for students to practice skills expected in engineering practice. For example,students presented their findings, defended their positions, and debated with fellow students andfaculty instructors their conclusions; such interactions allowed development of core engineeringcompetencies. This paper provides an overview of the challenges and learning activities thatwere developed for three specific courses that have been implemented at Northwestern. Wefocus on the assessments used to measure student understanding of the scientific concepts, aswell as the development of engineering skills. Studies were conducted in the domains of bio-optics and
Emerging Technologies Large language Assessment models LLMs Clinical workflow Healthcare Technology Healthcare Services Figure 1: Research area of interest.Literature reviewThere is a growing body of literature on the useability of large language models (LLMs) inhealthcare. This expanding interest from researchers reflects the importance of this technology inthe
Investments Investments CECAS graduate students make up between 28-33% of graduate student enrollment at Clemson UniversityThe graphics on this slide show the overall trends in graduate student enrollment inengineering and computing graduate programs (domestic and international studentscombined). These graphics will reflect fluctuations and illustrated that as overallenrollment at the university has increased at a rate of ~2% graudate
,2) classroom observations and reflections with teachers, and 3) analysis of student justificationsmade during the comparative sessions. All together, these activities have prepared us forprogress in the next phase of investigation about the efficacy of learning by evaluating. Theory of Action: Why LbE? Building on our pilot work with students, our theory of action is that the experience ofcomparing example work 1) meaningfully supports students’ design thinking mindset (helpingstudents think like designers), 2) critical thinking and reasoning (helping students to make andexplain decisions), and 3) ultimately their design performance (as students apply their thinking).These three variables are critical
Engineering. Her dissertation research broadly focused on global issues related to sustainable waste management and plastic pollution. After earning her PhD 2021 from the University of Georgia, Amy developed skills in qualitative research methods in engineering education at Oregon State University. As part of this training, she used interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) to examine engineering faculty well-being and collaborated on the development of a reflective tool for researchers to build skills in semi- and unstructured interviewing. Building on her postdoctoral training, Amy aims to merge her methodological interests to pursue research questions in the nexus of engineering education, sustainable development
a burgeoning recognition of the need for DEI withinengineering [11]-[13]. The current state of DEI in the discipline is one of active evolution andcommitment. Institutions, professional societies, and industry leaders are increasinglyemphasizing the creation of more inclusive environments that attract and support a diverseworkforce. Efforts are being made to dismantle the barriers that have historically led tounderrepresentation in engineering fields. Initiatives ranging from outreach programs aimed atyoung students to institutional reforms in hiring and retention practices reflect this shift towardsa more inclusive engineering community.The relevance of DEI in engineering cannot be overstated, as the field significantly impactsevery aspect
' critical thinking and problem-solving skills.In project-based activities, participants experimented with materials to examine their light-reflective properties. This material testing informed the design of daylighting systems for modelhouses, allowing students to directly apply the EDP. Through this hands-on approach, studentssynthesized their theoretical learning with tangible engineering tasks, and embodied the role ofengineers in solving contemporary challenges.Tools and InstrumentsQuantitative InstrumentsFor the quantitative analysis, we administered structured pre- and post-intervention surveys toevaluate changes in students' self-efficacy, STEM identity, and engineering knowledge. Thesesurveys, which featured a series of items on a 5-point
projects. Thisresearch also analyzes how adult learners interactively learn, reflect, and apply their AIknowledge to examples drawn from their workplace, while improving their understanding andreadiness to implement AI technologies effectively.Our three-day workshop centered around enriching and engaging learning about AI technologies,ethics, and leadership, featuring topics like supervised learning and bias, AI strategy, andgenerative AI. Apart from discussions, the workshops incorporated hands-on learning with digitaltools, robots, problem-solving scenarios, and a capstone project. Participants were 44 leadersfrom a large government organization. Their learning was measured through pre- andpost-questionnaires on AI leadership, knowledge checks
campustransitions. We recruited from dual credit (e.g., “Running Start”) programs, incoming transfer studentsfrom local two-year institutions, and pre-major STEM students. In the course, we includedtransformational experiences and personal artifacts as a way to enhance research identity and buildcommunity. The personal artifacts were used as a tool to allow students to share an aspect of themselveswith the research class.Student worksheets and reflective essays were collected to assess identity related tasks and reflections inthe course. Students completed a survey about the class experience, with 100% of students reportingagreement that the class had a positive sense of community and collaboration.IntroductionThe transition from a two year institution to
therelease of the Framework for P-12 Engineering Learning (FPEL) developed in partnership withthe American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE & AE3, 2020) provide differentapproaches to the inclusion of engineering in K-12 settings. In order to provide more clarity onthe learning goals for engineering education, this paper uses a directed content analysis design toidentify the alignment of research and practitioner articles to the learning goals promoted in theNGSS (2013) and FPEL (2020). With a focus on formal middle school classrooms in the UnitedStates, this study addresses the following research questions: 1) What are the trends in articlesbeing published?; 2) How are the FPEL learning goals reflected in the literature?; 3) How are
selection of portfolio content; the criteria forselection; the criteria for judging merit; and evidence of student self-reflection” [1].Archbald and Newmann [2] and Paulson, Paulson, and Meyer [1] were among the firstproponents of the idea that students should be active developers and assessors of their ownportfolios, and there is general agreement in the assessment community that students musttake the lead in documenting their learning. Towards that end, most portfolio assessmentsystems provide students at minimum with a general outline or “menu” of contents(suggested and/or required entries) and the evaluative criteria that will be applied.The AP ® Studio Art portfolio assessment has served as a critical model in conceptualizinga considerably
teachingtechniques and the knowledge they seek to convey.1.0 IntroductionDesign reviews or critiques are a common pedagogy for helping learners in any disciplinedevelop and demonstrate design expertise (Dym, Agogino, Eris, Frey & Leifer, 2005; Huet,Culley, McMahon & Fortin, 2007; Goldschmidt, 2002), although their structure and content mayvary across disciplines (Adams, 2016a). Many describe the practice of moving from desk todesk explaining what is right and wrong with student work as the “bread and butter” of designtraining (Goldschmidt, Casakin, Avidan & Ronen, 2014) and a central feature of preparingprofessionals as reflective practitioners (Schön, 1993).During design reviews, students receive feedback on their design decisions and guidance
teaching styles tend to rely on thedissemination of fundamental concepts in a lecture-style format with limited learner stimulation,active and experiential learning approaches prioritize both learner engagement and reflectionthroughout and often include lesson contextualization [9], [10].Although sometimes used synonymously, active learning and experiential learning are twoseparate pillars in modern education. The most widely accepted and cited definition of activelearning is provided by Bonwell and Eison in 1991 as: “Involving students in doing things andthinking about what they are doing [6].” Millis further elaborates on this definition and adds thatit often involves reflection and doing or taking action, and often uses cooperative
engineering itself. As such, K-12 engineering educationshould emphasize this interdisciplinary nature. Finally, engineering thinking involves critical andcreative problem solving and using informed judgment to make decisions. Moreover, learners inengineering education should be independent and reflective thinkers capable of seeking out newknowledge and learning from failure in problem-solving situations. These common pedagogical features present in both frameworks are sufficientlydocumented in the literature to improve student cognitive outcomes. For instance, English andcolleagues [21] and Li and colleagues [22] emphasize the benefits of integrative approaches toSTEM education, particularly when engineering content is present in the lesson
Persona External design Course design team Course design team creator consultant (cross-disciplinary) (mostly ECE) Persona Design observations First- and second-hand First- and second-hand background and ethnography observations from observations from course personnel, course instructors, written reflections and written reflections and feedback, surveys, feedback, assignments, assignments design observations Other analysis
; KDNuggets, 2015; Koschinsky, 2015; McGregor & Banifatemi,2018; Spanache, 2020; Syngenta & AI for Good Foundation, 2017; Vieweg, 2021). The maingoal of the proposed toolkit is to create a broad and accessible framework that can be used byresearchers who do work in the fields of applied data sciences. This toolkit is intended to serve asa planning, evaluation, and reflection guide for research teams who leverage data sciencesmethods and tools in their work. Developed by the ESJ group, the toolkit provides guidance onthe development of data science research projects that moves toward more ethically and sociallyjust processes and outcomes, while generating new knowledge, opportunities, and ideas for thefield at large (Brown & Mecklenburg
student, forgiving of inexperience, and provide opportunities for the student to make important contributions within the organization. Sufficient resources (equipment, space, supervision, team members) and a role which matches the student’s capabilities are necessary for a positive experience 3. Assessment – Assessment of learning outcomes which relate to relevant workplace skills and attributes are present 4. Reflection – Quality WIL programs support critical self-reflective practices for each experienceThe work environment for coop students in the Ideas Clinic aligns well with these fourcharacteristics. The coop students are developing academic activities for their fellow students.This ensures that the work is
the classroom and what beliefs they specifically draw upon to create instructional movesfor more equitable spaces. Fifty written reflections were analyzed from LAs from twoinstitutions who taught various STEM courses, including: chemical engineering, biologicalengineering, mechanical engineering, environmental engineering, chemistry, and biology. Thesereflections detail their thoughts about a chapter in Ilana Horn’s book [7], which discusses what itmeans to be “smart” in a mathematics classroom and ways to create instructional moves thatpromote more equitable learning environments and mitigate status differences. The concept ofsocial status was originally defined by Max Weber as cultural capital or otherwise described associetal values [8
reflections on their experience in the course indicate that the seminar-studio class structure contributed to an increased appreciation for the role that social and ethicalapproaches to engineering play in professional practice.LEGO Mindstorms in the Engineering ClassroomIn their article “LEGO-based Robotics in Higher Education: 15 Years of Student Creativity,”Ethan Danahy et al. provide a survey of the role LEGO robotics products have played in collegeclassrooms over a fifteen-year period from 1998, with the introduction of the LEGO MindstormsRCX, until 2013, with the advent of the LEGO Mindstorms EV3 [1]. They argue that LEGOrobotics sets offer a productive tool for facilitating a constructivist learning experience in which“explicit connections are
most important to facilitating learning about engineering in thisintroductory design course. Then, written reflective responses examined students' qualitativedescriptions and feedback to help clarify their reasoning behind their ranking choices. Thisexploratory study sheds light into how introductory engineering design course ideation andprototyping tools could influence students’ perceptions.Introduction and MotivationStudying the design process and associated instructional activities can help educators determinewhat students perceive about the utility of the tools they have learned. Furthermore, engaging ineffective and innovative design activities, mediated by the instructor’s choice of tools to share inclass, can equip students to better
perspectives of caregiversthemselves. This study explored experiences and shifts in caregiver perceptions of shifts withinthemselves and their children through participation in an out-of-school home-based engineeringprogram. Data were derived from post-program interviews with over 20 participating caregiversfrom three years of the program. Results illuminate various experiences and shifts in caregiverself-perception and understanding of their children’s learning and development. Specifically,these shifts included enhanced self-reflection and introspection, positive shifts in caregiverinteractions with children, and observed increases in self-efficacy and complex thinking withinchildren. Findings contribute to a growing body of knowledge of family
performance. Also, student perception of the BlendFlex modelof instruction with LA support is reported.This study was reviewed and approved by the University’s Institutional Review Board.MethodsSubjects and SurveysAfter each exam, students were given an Exam Wrapper to reflect on their preparation andperformance in terms of foundation, course involvement, study habit and activities, and sourcesof error (see Appendix, Table A1 and A2). The purpose of the reflection activity is to highlighthabits that are helpful to continue and reveal some areas that could be adjusted. This reflectionhelps students plan what to do differently and better to prepare for the next exam and asksstudents what instructors or assistants can do to support their learning. Exam
our rankings.IntroductionAcademic programs are ranked using different objective and subjective metrics, providingdifferent perspectives on the quality, productivity and affordability of the programs. Programrankings are closely followed by aspiring students, universities and employed in hiring andfunding decisions. Among the many rankings of programs, U.S. News rankings have a widefollowing. U.S. News updates the ranking of graduate programs in multiple fields annually.According to the statement from U.S. News’ website 1 , they rank the graduate programs based onboth statistical data and expert assessment data. The statistical data includes both input and outputmeasures, reflecting the quality of resources into the programs and educational
tales, a more holistic approach may beachieved: one which happens to be reflected in student learning outcomes associated with ABETaccreditation of undergraduate engineering programs. In addition, by exploring ‘missingnarratives’ – voices and stories that are silenced or excluded in a given narrative – we can betterunderstand the role of ethics and values in engineering designs and technological failures. Thisapproach allows for a learning-through-questioning, problem-based approach which has aninherent multidisciplinary appeal and the ability to motivate STEM student learning whileexploring questions of social justice, diversity, sustainability and global concerns.In a broader context, technologies themselves are inseparable from the concept
incorporation of groupwork experiences into cornerstone and capstone experiences, where individual work hashistorically been typical. However, as many institutions are experimenting with alternativemodels that incorporate group work throughout a degree program, there is little understanding ofhow—or whether—students are able to develop the skills they need to work on their own. In thisstudy, we address students’ views towards collaboration and their construction of individualcompetence in a novel transdisciplinary learning environment, where group projects are typicaland individual work is highly atypical.Collaboration and Teamwork SkillsEngineering education researchers have long recognized the importance of collaboration andteamwork, reflecting the
globally focused career with the need to work withpeople from a variety of technical and diverse backgrounds. This trend has been reflected inengineering pedagogy with a rise in teaming experiences in first-year and capstone designcourses of engineering curriculum in the U.S.1 Additionally the ABET EAC Student Outcomescurrently require students to have “(d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams”2. Evenwith recently proposed changes to the following criterion, “(7) An ability to function effectivelyas a member or leader of a team that establishes goals, plans tasks, meets deadlines, and creates acollaborative and inclusive environment,” ABET Student Outcomes still emphasize the need forengineering students to be able to work in diverse