Paper ID #38053“You’re just not what they’re looking for”: An intersectionalcollaborative autoethnography exploring pathways toengineering design doctoral programsKaylla Cantilina Kaylla Cantilina is a doctoral candidate in Design Science at the University of Michigan, conducting interdisciplinary research specializing in the intersections of engineering and social sciences. She obtained two undergraduate B.A. degrees in Industrial Design and Political Science and completed M.S. degrees in Industrial Operations Engineering and Design Science at UofM. Her work is motivated by design as a means for social justice
11.293.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Building a Bridge for Students to Transition from High-School to Engineering CurriculumAbstract The Wright Science, Technology and Engineering Preparatory Program was initiated in 1988to develop the education in science for the youth in city public schools which are mostlycomprised of first-generation college and economically challenged students. The participatingstudents upon successful completion of the program requirements while in 10th grade areawarded full-tuition scholarship to pursue a bachelor’s degree of their choice at our university.These high-school seniors while in 12th grade attend a series of workshops designed to aidstudents in having a
curriculum.This provided a unique type of feedback that most teachers had not received before. In July2009, this PD program was piloted with 12 pre-engineering/technology high school teachersusing the Engineering in Health Care module. This module was chosen because of its provensuccess and available student learning data compiled from previous years. All of the teachers who attended the PD program last summer plan to implement theHealth Care module in their respective class rooms during the 2009-2010 school year. Studentlearning data will be collected and compared to past years data to quantify the success of the PDprogram.BackgroundINSPIRES Curriculum The INSPIRES curriculum, funded by the National Science Foundation, has beendeveloped and
students whoself-reported a disability to the study did not report to their instructors or school.Digital note-taking has been increasingly implemented and studied in higher education for itspotential to further develop universal design for learning (UDL) techniques to benefit all students[3]. Accessibility for SWD with such technology is recognized as a best practice [3–6].Engineering education researchers have previously reported that SWD preferred searchablelecture video with transcriptions for the content delivery compared with students withoutdisabilities (SWOD) [4]. Furthermore, reported student interviews in the past showed all studentsin a course benefited from multiple modalities of content delivery in online learning [3–5].However
Johnstown. Prior to joining University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown, Dr. Parks worked for over seven years at the Alcoa Technical Center focusing on development and commercialization of sustainable wastewater treatment and solid waste reuse technologies. She also served as a member of the Alcoa Foundation Board of Direc- tors, providing environmental expertise to support the Foundation’s focus areas of Environment, Empow- erment, and Education, as well as her experience with science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education for women. Prior to joining Alcoa in 2008, Dr. Parks worked for approximately seven years as a consultant to government agencies, municipalities, and industrial clients performing water
haveadvanced more specific definitions of Making, such as: • “build[ing] or adapt[ing] objects by hand, for the simple pleasure of figuring out how things work”12; or • “a class of activities focused on designing, building, modifying and/or repurposing material objects, for playful or useful ends, oriented toward making a ‘product’ of some sort that can be used, interacted with, or demonstrated”13; or • “creative production in art, science and engineering where people of all ages blend digital and physical technologies to explore ideas, learn technical skills, and create new products”14.These broad definitions, and many others found in the Maker literature, seek to balance the needfor identifying boundaries around a
attending an International Summer Energy School. 2. Teacher attitudes toward science and engineering will improve as a result of experiencing problem-based learning (PBL) and engineering design with constraint activities as learners and teachers will subsequently use design and PBL pedagogies in their classrooms. 3. Teachers will more fully appreciate relationships that tie science fundamentals to technology applications and economic development, and become more forceful and convincing advocates for sustainable energy practices and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education.RET participating teachers (n=23) engaged in cutting-edge engineering research at West
Paper ID #6213Development of a Summer High School Research ProgramDr. Arif Sirinterlikci, Robert Morris University Arif Sirinterlikci is a professor of engineering at Robert Morris University. Besides advising Co-Op, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering students, he also serves as the Interim Head of the Engineering Department and Director of Engineering Laboratories. Sirinterlikci has been active in ASEE with K- 12/Pre-college, Manufacturing, Mechanical Engineering, and Engineering Technology Divisions.Miss Selin Frances Sirinterlikci Selin Sirinterlikci is a graduating senior from Moon Area High School in Moon
Basics of Technology Introduction to CADNeedless to say, it will take some time to gain enough statistical data to be able to measure thesuccess of these curricular changes, but we are hopeful that they will make a significantcontribution to the study success of our students.References: 1. E. Bratschitsch, A. Millward-Sadler: Praxis-Oriented Engineering Education in Vehicle Technology Studies - Challenges and Solutions, Proceedings of ASEE Conference & Exposition, Louisville, June 20th - 23rd 2010 2. Q. Li, H. Swaminathan, and J. Tang, Development of a Classification System for Engineering Student Characteristics Affecting College Enrollment and Retention. Journal of Engineering Education, October 2009, Vol. 98
. Introduction In higher education, a growing body of research focused on diversity and equity hasexplored the educational benefits of an inclusive learning environment [1]. As it relates tograduate education in engineering, attention has similarly been paid to creating inclusive learningenvironments and supporting the full participation of students. In a report titled “Graduate STEMEducation for the 21st Century”, the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine(NASEM) mentioned that, in an ideal STEM (science, technology, engineering, andmathematics) graduate education system, “Students from all backgrounds would fully participateand achieve their greatest potential during their educational experience through
(Division I) 2021-2022 Outstanding Research Publication Award.Dr. Erica M. McGreevy, University of Pittsburgh Teaching Associate Professor Department of Biological SciencesDr. Eric Trevor McChesney, University of Pittsburgh Eric McChesney (he/him) is a Postdoctoral Scholar for Psychosocial Interventions at Scale with the Learn- ing Research and Development center at the University of Pittsburgh. His work focuses on the develop- ment of robust, transferrable psychosocial interventions that improve the outcomes of and environments experienced by women, people of color, and other historically-marginalized students pursuing degrees in Science, Engineering, Mathematics, and Technology (STEM).Kevin R. Binning, University of
Paper ID #38011Enhancing Professional Interdisciplinary Engineering SkillsThrough the Application of Unmanned Aircraft Systems toSolve Real-World Remote Sensing MissionsMichael C. Hatfield (Associate Director of Science & Education, AlaskaCenter for Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration)Haley NelsonBrian C HolstTad J Nelson © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Enhancing Professional Interdisciplinary Engineering Skills Through the Application of Unmanned Aircraft Systems to Solve Real-World Remote Sensing Missions Michael Hatfield, Haley Nelson, Brian Holst
. E. Orr, Eds. New York: Cornell University Press, 1997, pp. 210-229.[15] P. M. Leonardi, M. H. Jackson, and A. Diwan, “The enactment-externalization dialectic: Rationalization and the persistence of counterproductive technology design practices in student engineering,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 52, no. 2., pp. 400-420. Apr. 2009. [Online]. Available doi:10.5465/amj.2009.37315471[16] T. Becher, and P. R. Trolwer, “Disciplinary socialization,” in Academic Tribes and Territories, Suffolk, UK: St. Edmundsbury Press, 2001, pp. 47-54.[17] K. J. B. Anderson, S. S. Courter, T. McGlamery, T. M. Nathans-Kelly, and C. G. Nicometo, “Understanding engineering work and identity: A cross-case analysis of engineers within six
Paper ID #37228Qualitative Engineering Education Researchers and ourRelationships with Data: Exploring our Epistemologies andValues as a CommunityNadia Kellam Dr. Nadia Kellam (she/they) is Associate Professor of Engineering within The Polytechnic School of the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University (ASU). She is a faculty in the Engineering Education Systems and Design (EESD) PhD program and currently advises three doctoral students. Dr. Kellam is an engineering education researcher and a mechanical engineer. She is also deputy editor of the Journal of Engineering Education and co-chair of
Paper ID #37146Board 285: Exploring Impacts of Socially Engaged Engineering Training:What Do Students’ Attend to in Scenario-Based Interviews?Ms. Kelley E Dugan, University of Michigan Kelley E. Dugan is an (incoming) Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Her research aims to understand and support complex sociotech- nical problem solving in engineering, which can often be framed as engineering design problems. They focus on how social dimensions can be recognized and integrated into problem solving processes by studying student and practicing engineers
Paper ID #33175Negotiating Belongingness: A Longitudinal Narrative Inquiry of a LatinaFirst-generation College Student’s Experience in the Engineering CultureDr. Dina Verd´ın, Arizona State University Dina Verd´ın, PhD is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education Systems and Design in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. She graduated from San Jos´e State University with a BS in Industrial Systems Engineering and from Purdue University with an MS in Industrial En- gineering and PhD in Engineering Education. Her research broadly focuses on broadening participation in engineering by
management. Tanya taught mathematics at the Denver School of Science and Technology, the highest performing high school in Denver Public Schools. She is a PhD candidate in the School of Education at University of Colorado Boulder studying Learning Sciences and Human Development. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 “SHE’S WALKING INTO LIKE SYSTEMS DYNAMICS. WHAT IS SHE DOING HERE?” A NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF A LATINA ENGINEERIntroductionA narrative analysis provides a subjective analytical view of the world from the narrator’sreconstruction of events and presents an interpretation and understanding of these events toothers
College of Engineering Exceptional Early Career Teaching Award.Dr. Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno Adam Kirn is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at University of Nevada, Reno. His research focuses on the interactions between engineering cultures, student motivation, and learning ex- periences. His projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs, and attitudes towards becoming engineers, their problem-solving processes, and cultural fit. His education includes a B.S. in Biomed- ical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, a M.S. in Bioengineering, and a Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education from Clemson University. American
Transformations Institute (EETI) in the College of Engineering. The Engineering Education Transformations Institute at UGA is an innovative approach that fuses high quality engineering education research with systematic educational innovation to transform the educational practices and cultures of engineering. Dr. Walther’s research group, the Collab- orative Lounge for Understanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER), is a dynamic interdisciplinary team that brings together professors, graduate, and undergraduate students from engineering, art, educational psychology, and social work in the context of fundamental educational research. Dr. Walther’s research program spans interpretive research
ScienceFoundation, National Academy of Engineering, American Society for Engineering Education,and the United States government, among others.After a substantial review process that took several years and several committees of high rankingmembers from academia and industry, the National Academy of Engineering in its EducatingThe Engineer of 2020 report1 recommended in 2005 that engineering education establishmentsseek to achieve the following: 1. Pursue a student-centered approach to undergraduate engineering education. 2. Increase the value in engineering education research to better understand how students learn. 3. Develop new standards for faculty qualifications. 4. Help promote engineering and technological literacy among the
. Dr. Eddy received her doctorate in Applied Cognitive Psychology and has spent her career focused on ap- plying the principles of learning and cognition to evaluation of educational programs. Her work includes published articles and client technical reports as President of Cobblestone Applied Research & Evalu- ation, Inc. and a faculty member at Claremont Graduate University. Work at Cobblestone focuses on advancing the numbers of underrepresented minority students in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) fields. Dr. Eddy has conducted evaluation or applied research studies on numerous university projects including clients programs funded by the National Science Foundation; U.S. Depart- ment
evolve her prior research on social and cultural capital away from a ”normative” state that requires students to conform to the main- stream institution of engineering education. In addition to research, she is deeply interested in STEM education policy, and held a Science and Technology Policy Fellowship with the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2012-2013. Dr. Martin has held a variety of national leader- ship positions during her decade-long involvement in ASEE and Women in Engineering ProActive Net- work (WEPAN). In 2016, she won the ASEE Educational Research and Methods Division Distinguished Service award. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017
Paper ID #21613Lessons Learned from a Chemical Engineering REU: The Importance ofTraining Graduate Students Who are Supervising REU StudentsJoseph C. Tise, Pennsylvania State University Joseph Tise is a doctoral candidate in the Educational Psychology program at Penn State University. His research interests include self-regulated learning, measurement, and connecting educational research to practice.Ms. Kirsten Susan Hochstedt, Pennsylvania State University Kirsten Hochstedt is a graduate assistant at Penn State Student Affairs Research and Assessment. She received her M.S. in Educational Psychology with an emphasis in
. Following military service, Michael obtained a Bachelor of Sci- ence in Engineering degree from Arizona State University, graduating in 2013. His research and service interests include veterans in engineering, veterans with service-connected disability, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and human sex trafficking.Dr. Nadia N. Kellam, Arizona State University Dr. Nadia Kellam is Associate Professor in the Polytechnic Engineering Program at Arizona State Uni- versity. Prior to this position, she was an Associate Professor at the University of Georgia, where she was co-director of the interdisciplinary engineering education research Collaborative Lounge for Un- derstanding Society and Technology through Educational
AC 2008-544: EMPLOYING SOCRATIC PEDAGOGY TO IMPROVEENGINEERING STUDENTS’ CRITICAL REASONING SKILLS: TEACHING BYASKING INSTEAD OF BY TELLINGMichael Golanbari, University of the Pacific Michael Golanbari received the Ph.D. degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of California, Davis, in 1999. From 2000 to 2003 he was a communications systems engineer on the technical staff of Alantro Communications Corporation and Texas Instruments (TI) Corporation, Santa Rosa, California. At Alantro and TI, he worked on wireless local area network (WLAN) transceiver design and development (IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n, WiFi). Since 2003 he has been on the faculty of the Department of
given purpose (i.e.,evaluation)2. Within the context of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET),the lowest levels in any learning hierarchy model are incompatible with required ABET programoutcomes. According to ABET1, three of the required 11 ABET student outcomes include 1) theability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (i.e., ABET studentoutcome [a]), 2) the ability to design and conduct experiments (i.e., ABET student outcome [b]),and 3) the ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (i.e., ABET studentoutcome [e]). It is important that engineering faculty of all disciplines continuously push theenvelope and work to elevate student learning and comprehension so that
Paper ID #9083Introducing an Instructional Model for ”Flipped Engineering Classrooms”-Part (II): How Do Group Discussions Foster Meaningful Learning?Dr. Jia-Ling Lin, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Dr. Jia-Ling Lin is a research scientist in the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathemat- ics) Education Center at the University of Minnesota Twin Cities. Her research is centered in areas of teaching and learning in engineering and physics. In particular, she focuses on establishing and examin- ing instructional models that facilitate problem solving and deep learning in physics and engineering for
The NSF-ADVANCE Program and the Recruitment and Retention of Women Engineering Faculty at New Mexico State University Lisa M. Frehill, Ph. D. New Mexico State UniversityRecruitment and retention of women engineering faculty has become an increasingly importantissue as baby boomers hired in the 1970s and early 1980s have begun to retire. In general,higher education has difficulty competing with the lucrative salaries, benefits, and workingconditions offered by industry, which is especially the case with engineering. Concern for theprofessorate has led to a number of programmatic efforts at the National Science Foundation(NSF) to improve access to the
science, math, and engineering courses do not adequately address the rapidchanges that these students face in their industrial careers. Specifically in engineering, theAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET)— which is the only agencyresponsible for accreditation of education programs leading to degrees in engineering — hasrecently published new standards which increases the focus on students’ ability to perform real-world job tasks (PRISM, 1997).Augustine (Augustine, 1997) tells us that ABET is correctly responding to fundamental changesin the engineering profession that push us to accredit programs on more than simplyprofieciencies in traditional engineering skills. Because of these changes, todays engineer mustbe able to
Paper ID #43880Evaluation of LLMs and Other Machine Learning Methods in the Analysis ofQualitative Survey Responses for Accessible Engineering Education ResearchXiuhao Ding, University of Illinois at Urbana - ChampaignMeghana Gopannagari, University of Illinois at Urbana - ChampaignKang Sun, University of Illinois at Urbana - ChampaignAlan Tao, University of Illinois at Urbana - ChampaignDelu Louis ZhaoSujit Varadhan, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Sujit Varadhan is a Junior at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign majoring in Computer Science. He is an undergraduate research assistant as well as a frontend