water, water footprint, water-in-energy) X X to develop MATLAB function to solve for water footprint (MCC ONLY) X X to graph and compare the results from different online water footprint tools (ASU ONLY) X to contrast differences between online water footprint tools and justify which tool(s) account most realistically account for virtual water footprints (ASU ONLY) X XWater-for-energy
Newman fromthe Department of Chemistry at IUPUI for their contribution in teaching and supervisingresearch projects in nanotechnology for students pursuing this track. The development of thetrack was supported by National Science Foundation–Nanotechnology Undergraduate Education(NUE) grant 1042110.References:1. Zheng W., Shih H. R., Lozano K., Pei J. S., Kiefer K., and Ma X., “A Practical Approach to Integrating Nanotechnology Education and Research into Civil Engineering Undergraduate Curriculum,” J. Nano. Educ., vol. 1, pp. 22-33, 2009.2. Mehta B. R., “Nano Education at Indian Institutes of Technology: A Status Report,” J. Nano. Educ., vol. 1, pp. 106-108, 2009.3. Certificate in Nanotechnology and Nanoscience, George Mason
willingness of the student interviewees to participate and for theiropenness and honesty with the researchers about their views and beliefs.Bibliography1. NAE, Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century, Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.2. ABET, "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs Effective for Evaluation During the 2009-2010 Accredidation Cycle," ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission, 2008.3. ASCE, "Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century: Preparing the Civil Engineer for the Future, 2nd Edition," ASCE, 2008.4. AAEE, "Environmental Engineering Body of Knowledge," American Academy of Environmental Engineers, 2009.5. R. S. Weiss, Learning from Strangers
1157070. The first author greatly appreciates the Texas A&M University AerospaceREU Program and mentors for their support and the activities provided in making this researchexperience an opportunity for continuous learning.Bibliography 1. Barbarino, S., Bilgen, O., Ajaj, R. M., Friswell, M. I., and Inman, D. J. 2011. “A Review of Morphing Aircraft,” Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 22: 823–877. 2. Bertacchini, O.W. 2009. “Characterization and modeling of transformation induced fatigue of shape memory alloy actuators,” Doctor of Philosophy dissertation, Texas A&M University. 3. Bierögel, C., Grellmann, W., Fahnert, T., and Lach R. 2006. “Material parameters for the evaluation of PA
. Balderrama, A. Should your boss be your Facebook friend? - CNN.com. CNN at 11. Krippendorf, K. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. (Sage, 2003).12. Neuendorf, K. The content analysis guidebook. (Sage Publications, 2002).13. Hatmaker, T. 3 easy tools for crafting a great-looking personal webpage. Read/Write Web at 14. Henry, A. How can I sell my skills beyond a boring resume? Lifehacker at 15. Stemler, S. An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 7, http:––PAREonline.net–getvn.asp?v=7&n=1716. cross-tab Online Reputation in a Connected World. microsoft.com (2009).at 17. Enge, E., Spencer, S., Fishkin, R. & Stricchiola, J. The art of SEO: Mastering search engine
Coulomb’s law to electric point charge situations.” (p. 16). Again,similar to the performance of the experimental group from Maloney et al.’s study, our responsesshowed answer choice C as the second favored choice. Besides the fewer correct responsesobtained in this question compared to the previous item, correct answer option B wasconclusively the response with the highest percentage of correct answers.Lastly, question 3 showed an increase in incorrect responses. Authors relate this issue as“confusion on both the effect of the magnitude of the charge and the distance of separation” (p.16). Answer choice D predominantly obtained the highest percentages of correct answers with a50% in the pretest and 45% in the posttest. Contrary of the previous two
Management Executive, 1988, 2(2): 127-132 12. Russell, Jeffrey S., W. B. Stouffer, (2005), "Survey of the national civil engineering curriculum", Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 131(2): 118-128 13. Toor, S., Ofori, G., Leadership versus Management: How are they different and why? Leadership and Management in Engineering, 8(2), April, 2008 14. Yoder, B.L., (2012), "Engineering by the Numbers." American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC. http://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/collegeprofiles/2011-profile-engineering- statistics.pdf
Skills: Theory and Practice. New York Garland Pub. (Inc, 1992).13. Willingham, D. T. Critical Thinking: Why Is It So Hard to Teach? Arts Educ. Policy Rev. 109, 21–32 (2008).14. Facione, P. A. Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Research Findings and Recommendations. (1990). at Page 24.121.815. Facione, P. A. Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Millbrae CA Calif. Acad. Press Retrieved April 1, 2004 (2011).16. Norris, S. P. Synthesis of research on critical thinking. Educ. Leadersh. 42, 40–45 (1985).17. Norris, S. P. The
. Birdsong. Research in the Undergraduate Environment, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, 2006.2. P. Jansson, R. P. Ramachandran, J. L. Schmalzel and S. A. Mandayam, “Creating an Agile ECE Learning Environment Through Engineering Clinics”, IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 455-462, August 2010.3. S. Davis, M. Frankle, R. P. Ramachandran, K. D. Dahm and R. Polikar, “A Freshman Level Module in Biometric Systems”, accepted in IEEE Int. Symp. on Circuits and Systems, Beijing, China, May 19-23, 2013.4. B. Y. Smolenski and R. P. Ramachandran, “Usable Speech Processing: A Filterless Approach in the Presence of Interference”, IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine, Special Issue on Speaker
Coordinator Conference and completion of Student Evaluation Form)Following grading scale is observed for each course: (94 - 100%, A), (90- 93%, A-), (87- 89%,B+), (83- 86%, B), (80- 82%, B-), (77- 79%, C+), (70- 76%,C), (60 -69, D), (0 -59, F)During the course of the internship, the student must develop and maintain a weekly journal, toserve as a tool for recording learning experiences5. The journal should also include log of thestudent's activities and a collection of thoughts and insights gained from the activities. Thejournal may contain any on-the-job issues or problems and related solutions or courses of actiontaken. A final report is also mandatory. This is above and beyond the weekly journal. The formatand topic(s) of the final report is
make informed decisions about engineering. The suggested follow-‐on study is needed to verify that, indeed, this informed decision making does improve both retention and graduation rates. References [1] ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission, Criteria For Accrediting Engineering Programs, ABET, Baltimore, MD. 2011. [2] Astin, A. W., & Astin, H. S., “Final report: Undergraduate science education: The impact of different college environments on the educational pipeline in the sciences.” Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute, Graduate School of Education, UCLA, 1992. [3] Committee on Engineering Education, Educating the
Sensor Networks with NetworkLifetime Requirement, MobiHoc, May 2004[28] EMA enclosure standards, http://www.nema.org/prod/be/enclosures/.[29] J.H.Reisert, "Antenna Selection and Specification Made Easy," Astron Wireless Technologies, Inc.,Technical Library, http://www.astronwireless.com/antsel.htm[30] S.W. Arms, C.P.Townsend, D.L. Churchill, J.H.Galbreath,S.W. Mundell. “Power Management forEnergy Harvesting Wireless Sensors,” SPIE Int’l Symposium on Smart Structures & Smart Materials, SanDiego, CA, March 2005, pp.1-9.[31] D. Rakhmatov and S. Vrudhula, Energy Management for Battery-Powered Embedded Systems,ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing systems, 2, August 2003[32] System Level Lab Manual of WSN based Sensing and Data Visualization on
connections break and become open.Bibliography 1 Northrup, S., Moriarty, J., Vallee, G., Presz, W., “A Successful Interdisciplinary Engineering Design Experience.” Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Annual Conference, June 20 – 23, 2003, Nashville, TN. 2 eac-criteria-2013-2014.pdf, downloaded on January 6, 2012 from www.abet.org 3 D. H. Stamatis, Failure Mode and Effect Analysis, FMEA from Theory to Execution, 2 nd Edition, ASQ Quality Press, Milwaukee, WI, June 2003. 4 McDermott, R.E., Mikulak, R.J., & Beauregard, M.R., The Basics of FMEA, 2nd Edition, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group LLC, New York, NY, 2008. 5 Amberkar, S., Czerny, B.J., D’Ambrosio, J.G., Demerly, J.D., & Murray, B.T., A Comprehensive
, 2010.6. Science and Engineering Indicators 2012. National Science Board, 2012.7. Rising Above The Gathering Storm. National Academy of Sciences. 2007.8. Alexander, B.B., J.A. Foertsch, and S. Daffinrud, Spend a Summer with a Scientist program: An evaluation of program outcomes and the essential elements of success. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, LEAD Center, 1998.9. Russell, S., Evaluation of NSF Support for Undergraduate Research Opportunities, Draft Synthesis Report. SRI International, 1100 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 2800, Arlington, VA 22209-3915, 2006.10. Russell, S.H., M.P. Hancock, and J. McCullough, Benefits of Undergraduate Research Experiences. Science, 2007. 316: p. 548-549.11. Alexander, B.B., et al
the community, and 3) enabling students to practice autonomy and personalresponsibility in directing their own learning.Servant-Leadership is a leadership paradigm established by Robert Greenleaf in the 1970’s thatemphasizes power sharing in decision making processes. It also encourages leaders to servethose they manage by gently guiding and propelling them toward high achievement andaccomplishment while promoting their growth and self-efficacy. Servant-Leadership advocates ahierarchical structure different from the classical top-down management pyramid often seen inindustry and academia. In industry, management rests at the top of the structure supported byworkers, and in academia, teachers are authority figures with control over content
. Carletta, J., Bayles T.M., Kalveram, K., Khorbotly, S., Macnab, C., Nazhandali, L., Rice, J., Smith, J.A., Turner, L.E., Williams, S. and L. Wyard-Scott, “Special Session – Real World Engineering Projects: Discovery-Based Curriculum Modules for First-Year Students”, Paper published in the Proceedings of the 39th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference; presented in session T1A, San Antonio, TX, October, 2009. 3. Bayles, T.M., “Introduction to Engineering Design: An Emphasis on Communication”, Paper AC-2009-1482 published in the 2009 ASEE proceedings and presentation in the Freshman Programs Division, San Antonio, TX, June 2009. 4. https://academicskills.anu.edu.au/resources/handouts/writing-reflective-marker
chemicals and biological agents as well as safety procedures for injuries,fires, and other problems. Some students also had attended department-specific safety programs- usually in the first year of their graduate programs. To upgrade all students skills, the leadoperator(s) of each piece of major equipment led a short workshop on using that peice ofequipment. Students attending the workshops were enthusiastic about the training. As shown inTable 1, Question 1, students ranked their base knowledge of operating the laboratory equipmentrelatively high (5.9 out of 8), but still felt that the workshops significantly improved their skills. Table 1. Evaluation of 2011-2012 Program, Part 1 Question
Page 23.154.3contain the item in y. Properties of association rules may be expressed in terms of differentdefined measures. The support count of an itemset is the number of transactions that contain theitemset. We denote the number of elements in an itemset x by |x|. Then the support of itemset x is σ ( x) = {t i | x ∈ t i , t i ∈ T } .The support of a rule x→ y, is the proportion of transactions that contain the itemsets in the rule.This is the support count of the union of the antecedent and the consequent divided by the totalnumber of transactions as in Equation 1. σ ( x ∪ y) s( x → y
Cognition: Theory, Research and Applications1992, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.4. Lane, D., N. Seery, and S. Gordon, The Intermediate Role of the Visuo-Spatial Sketchpad in Developing Sketching Expertise, in EDGD 66th Midyear Meeting2012: Galveston, TX. p. 79-91.5. Reisberg, D. and F. Heuer, Visuospatial Images, in The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking, P. Shah and A. Miyake, Editors. 2005, Cambridge University Press: New York.6. Fish, J. and S. Scrivener, Amplifying the Mind's Eye: Sketching and Visual Cognition. Leonardo, 1990. 23(1): p. 117-126.7. Humphreys, G.W. and V. Bruce, Visual Cognition: Computational, Experimental and Neuropsychological Perspectives1989, London
, electrical and building codes) are available online or in theCollege library and are accessible to the student work crews during the class meeting. Thesubmittals required the use of a digital drawing package to prepare sketches, simple explorationof building codes and manufacturers’ and vendors’ specifications and group work planning andcommunication including safety considerations.The Lab 4 safety plan required the following planning: • Assign a responsible person for administering the safety plan – primarily to make sure all workers wear safety protection and someone is always monitoring the work and work area during the installation process. • A plan to control movement thru work areas – identify a responsible person(s) to
awareness of the ethical implications . . . woven throughout myfield.” Another said that the ethical component “made me think about what I was working on inan entirely different light.” A third said that the ethics project “make[s] you think not only as anengineer but makes you look at the profession from a wider view and . . . see how your workcould affect other people.”Students were also asked to rate the degree to which it was useful for them to learn about the“How People Learn” model, which is unique to the VaNTH summer program compared tosummer programs in traditional labs. Eight students said that it was “very” or “somewhat”useful, with the average answer being 2.9. One said that the “weekly HPL discussion group atMIT . . . [was] particularly
between four and seven characters as a numbering convention for reinforcing steel. The numbering convention on the construction plan sheets begins with the first letter of the structural element, e.g. if the rebar is going to be used in an abutment then the first character will be the letter A. Likewise, if the structural element is a pier the first letter will be P. The following list illustrates typical beginning letters: Abutment / Wingwalls = A Pier = P Deck (Slab) = S Diaphragms = D Parapets and End Posts = EP The next character in the reinforcing bar numbering convention is the size of the rebar to be used at that location
Session 2366 PROCEED: A Department-Wide Curriculum Reform Initiative in Project-Centered Education Philip S. Schmidt and Joseph J. Beaman Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Texas at AustinAbstractThe Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin has undertaken amajor curriculum reform effort entitled PROCEED, an acronym for Project-Centered Education.The strategic objectives of PROCEED are: (1) to strengthen our students’ understanding offundamental engineering theory by continuously tying it
with the need to increase production volumes andto make inroads elsewhere. Also, in the mid-1970’s, when the inability of a French or Germanconsumer of British equipment to fit his 13mm nut on a British ½ in. bolt was enough reason toreject British equipment and buy elsewhere, it became clear to the British engineer thatmetrication was the way to go.Another equally important reality of global interdependence is the need for the unfettered butregulated movement of professional expertise across national borders (Ramos1, Van Damme2,Jones3). To accomplish this, there is the need to equip engineering students with the knowledgeof how the profession is practiced in other countries in preparation for their future participation inglobal practice. To
Session 2586 The Verizon Next Step Program: A Look Back and a Look Ahead Gary J. Mullett Next Step New England Curriculum Coordinator – Electronics William S. Mullett Next Step New England Curriculum Coordinator – PhysicsI. OverviewThe innovative Verizon NextStep Program is a unique industry/education collaboration thatprovides Verizon employees with the opportunity to earn an associate in applied science degree(A.A.S.) in telecommunications technology during their regular workweek. Started in the State ofNew York in 1995 by the
ready to load within 30 seconds 6. Failure load predicted within 15% or 1 lb 7. Bridge supports two, 12-ounce can of soda 8. A golf ball can traverse the bridge deck 9. Bridge provides minimum warning of 5 s 10. Bridge is visually appealing Summation of Criteria 0.125 Load[lb ] Bridge[ oz] { ∑ (crit.) + 3 * ∑ (imp.) + 1 * ∑ Grade = 5 * } (des
Machine Element s & Senior Design Page 8.249.5 Table 1. Course outline for Kinematics and Dynamics of Machines coursemechanical devices including gears, cams, and differentials, and continue on to general 1DOF co-planar mechanism modeling and analysis using a “dyad” based approach. The point being thatthere is barely enough classroom time to cover the desired technical content, much less time toteach the use of appropriate math and engineering software.The approach taken in this course to deal with the lack of classroom time incorporates the use of“screen capture with audio” AVI tutorials, along with a variety of interactive
2 50.0 20.534 90 178.0 88.314 67.78 4 U 0 283.0 14 2 103.5 31.112 430 251.4 98.899 67.79 3 J 0 236.9 24 1 96.4 29.566 180 211.6 95.913 66.35 8 S 0 250.0 32 1 98.4 31.061 404 238.2 98.292 67.23 6 I 0 283.6 24 2 103.6 32.143 100 268.2 99.372 67.23 7 AA 0 419.2 10 2 124.4 37.936 571 600.0 100.000 62.06 11 Z 0 151.7 24 2 83.3 25.147 200 175.5 87.416 62.27 10 L 79.5 59.5
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education5. Gerbec, D.E., D.N. Skillman, and S. Conrad (1994) “The Implementation of Design Projects in a Freshman ‘Introduction to Engineering’ Course,” Proceedings 1994 American Society for Engineering Education, Edmonton, Canada, page 2325.6. MSNBC (1997) ”The Site,” Comments made by invited guest and commentator on 2 July 1997.7. Nelson, James K., David H. Reilly, and Russell H. Brown (1998) “Teaching Engineering to Cyber Children,” Proceedings of the 1998 ASEE Southeastern Section Meeting, American Society for Engineering Education, Orlando, FL.8. Kaha, C. W. (1990) “Learning Environments for the Twenty-First Century. Educational Horizons, Fall Ed., pp. 45-49.9. Embretson, S
the uncertainty.Recap of Error Propagation Analysis. The basic idea in error propagation analysis (EPA) is therecognition of direct and indirect measurements. An indirect measurement is calculated from adirect measurement. Assume that m independent direct measurements, the set of wi s below,contribute to an indirect measurement, z. The measurement formula is then merely the functionused to calculate the z, z = z (w1 , w2 ,⋅ ⋅ ⋅ wm ) (10)The operational concepts of EPA are incorporated in two equations. The first addresses how theuncertainty in the indirect measurement z (i. e., the dependent variable) is caused by theuncertainty in some more directly measured variable, w (i. e., an